| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Original Studies |
Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Psychiatry, and Center for Reproductive Sciences, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York 10032
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Michel Ferin, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 630 West 168th Street, New York, New York 10032. E-mail: mf8{at}columbia.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although the above data suggest a putative role of VEGF in folliculogenesis, direct evidence for an active role of angiogenesis, and of VEGF in particular, in the cyclic follicular growth and maturation process remains to be obtained. The present study in the rhesus monkey was designed to provide such evidence by investigating the effects of a temporary suppression of angiogenesis during the late follicular phase using anti-VEGF antibodies.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Regularly cycling female rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), weighing 48 kg, were used in this study. The animals were housed in individual cages in temperature- and light (lights on, 07301930 h)-controlled rooms. They were fed Purina monkey chow (Ralston Purina Co., St. Louis MO) twice daily and fresh fruit or vegetables. Water was available at all times. Menstruation was determined by daily vaginal swabbing. Blood samples were obtained by venipuncture (a process to which the animals had been previously habituated). The experimental protocol was approved by the animal care and use committee of Columbia University and was performed in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.
Experimental protocols
The experiment was designed to investigate in the primate the role of angiogenesis in folliculogenesis using an anti-VEGF antibody. Two normal control ovulatory cycles were documented before initiation of the experiment. In the first experimental protocols, animals (n = 7) received iv injections of anti-VEGF antibodies (0.5 mg each day) on 2 successive days in the late follicular phase, at a time when mean estradiol (E2) concentrations were 99.3 ± 5.0 (±SE; range, 74112) pg/mL. To monitor possible delayed effects of antibody treatment, the posttreatment cycle was also investigated. Daily blood samples were drawn throughout the entire period to monitor cyclicity in the control, treatment and posttreatment cycles and to determine the effects of anti-VEGF antibody treatment. After one normal ovulatory cycle was again documented, three of these monkeys received iv injections of nonspecific goat IgG (0.5 mg each day) on 2 successive days in the late follicular phase (mean E2, 97.3 ± 4.1; range, 91117 pg/mL). Daily blood samples were similarly obtained and analyzed.
Polyclonal antihuman VEGF antibody (R and D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN) was raised in goats immunized against recombinant human VEGF containing 165 amino acid residues (rhVEGF165). This VEGF-specific IgG was purified by human VEGF affinity chromatography. [According to the manufacturer, this antibody shows no cross-reactivity with human platelet-derived growth factors (hPDGF-AA, hPDGF-AB, and hPDGF-BB), hVEGF B, hVEGF C, hVEGF D, human placenta growth factor, human connective tissue growth factor, and hFlt-1, and was selected for its ability to neutralize the biological activity of rhVEGF165 and rhVEGF121.] Purified goat IgG (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) was obtained from pooled normal goat sera. Both lyophilized preparations were reconstituted in physiological saline to final concentrations of 1 mg/mL, and aliquots were stored at -70 C until use.
Assays and statistical analysis
Blood samples were centrifuged, and sera were kept at -20 C until assay. Concentrations of E2, to assess follicular maturation, and of progesterone, to evaluate luteal phase quality, were measured in daily serum samples by a chemiluminescent immunoassay using the Immulite system (Diagnostic Products, Los Angeles, CA). Interassay coefficients of variation were 11.9% and 11.1% for E2 and progesterone, respectively. To detect potential effects of the treatment on gonadotropin secretion, LH and FSH concentrations were also measured by recombinant homologous RIA (14) using reagents provided by the National Hormone and Pituitary Program. Assay sensitivity (at 95% binding) for LH and FSH was 0.01 and 0.02 ng/tube respectively. Intra- and interassay coefficients of variation were 7.0% and 13.1%, respectively, for LH and 5.0% and 6.1% for FSH.
Cycle parameters (length of the follicular and luteal phase), hormone concentrations, and integrated progesterone values during the luteal phase (as calculated by trapezoidal analysis of the areas under the daily progesterone curves) were compared in control, treatment, and posttreatment cycles. Comparisons between control and experimental cycles were made using multiple ANOVA, followed by the Tukey test. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Anti-VEGF antibody administration in the late follicular phase
significantly lengthened the follicular phase in six of seven monkeys,
from 10.0 ± 0.7 and 9.8 ± 0.7 days (mean ±
SE) in the two preceding control cycles to 17.8 ± 1.7
days in the treatment cycle. Posttreatment cycle length, however, was
similar to that in the control cycles (Table 1
). One monkey (not
included in Table 1
or Fig. 1
) did not respond to the treatment. The
follicular phase in animals receiving nonspecific goat IgG (n = 3)
was similar in length (10.7 ± 0.3 days) to that in the control
cycle (Table 1
). There were no differences in luteal phase length
between control, treatment, and posttreatment cycles (Table 1
).
|
|
After anti-VEGF antibody administration, E2
concentrations decreased from 99.3 ± 5.0 pg/mL (preinjection
control on day 0) to 63.3 ± 12.2 (day 1), 48.5 ± 8.7 (day
2; P < 0.01), and 57.6 ± 9.0 (day 3;
P < 0.05; Fig. 1
). These values contrast with the
increasing E2 concentrations observed in the same
animals during the control cycles; starting on a day of comparable
E2 concentrations (day 0: 96.1 ± 6.0),
these values increased to 125.5 ± 20.0 (day 1), 165.5 ±
24.9 (day 2), and 183.8 ± 11.0 (day 3). Figure 1
compares mean
E2 concentrations in control cycles to individual
E2 concentrations in six monkeys receiving
anti-VEGF antibody. After a variable delay in the animals receiving
anti-VEGF antibody, E2 concentrations increased
to reach a preovulatory peak. Mean preovulatory
E2 peaks were similar in control cycles
(183.8 ± 11.0 pg/mL), anti-VEGF-treated cycles (230 ±
29.8), and nonspecific IgG-treated cycles (187 ± 17.8),
respectively. All animals had a LH surge, although it was delayed in
six monkeys treated with anti-VEGF antibody. Ovulation occurred in all
animals, and although appearance of the luteal phase was delayed in
animals receiving anti-VEGF antibody, luteal function, as reflected by
integrated luteal progesterone concentrations, was comparable in the
control, treatment, and posttreatment cycles (Table 1
). Basal LH and
FSH concentrations increased in all six animals after anti-VEGF
antibody treatment compared with those in animals treated with
nonspecific IgG, although the increase was statistically significant
only for FSH (Table 2
). No effect of
nonspecific goat IgG administration on E2 or
progesterone secretion was observed.
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this specific protocol, anti-VEGF treatment was initiated in the late follicular phase, at a time when a dominant follicle has already been selected and when peripheral E2 secretion reflects the growth rate of this follicle (15, 16, 17). The facts that the treatment interrupted the characteristic rise in E2 secretion and resulted in a significant lengthening of the follicular phase directly demonstrate that in the absence of adequate VEGF stimulation, normal follicular maturation is interfered with. We interpret this impediment to normal follicular growth to be the result of a temporary interruption of local angiogenesis. In addition, these data may reflect a reduction in local vascular permeability, as experimental data suggest a role for VEGF in this process (6, 7). In either case, neutralization of VEGF activity would, among other effects, limit access to the peripheral factors needed to support follicle growth, such as, for example, the gonadotropins. It is well known that LH and FSH are required for proper E2 secretion (15, 16). Interestingly, data in the literature also suggest a role for the gonadotropins in VEGF production by the follicle. Studies with monkey granulosa cells demonstrate that not only are large amounts of gonadotropins representative of the midcycle ovulatory surge, but smaller amounts, more typical of tonic secretion, enhance local VEGF production (18, 19). A similar stimulation of VEGF is seen in PMS-stimulated rats after hCG administration (20). Furthermore, decreased VEGF messenger ribonucleic acid expression, albeit in the corpus luteum, is seen in the monkey after GnRH antagonist administration. Such data confirm the dependence of local ovarian VEGF activity on tonic gonadotropin secretion (10), and thus, it may not be surprising that VEGF activity increases in the maturing follicle in the late follicular phase. Overall, VEGF antibody treatment may not only impede angiogenesis directly, but also potentially decrease local VEGF production by modifying local vascular permeability and decreasing gonadotropin support of VEGF synthesis.
Similar effects on E2 secretion and menstrual cycle length were reported in the human and the monkey after the administration of a GnRH antagonist during the follicular phase (21, 22, 23). Although this remains to be demonstrated, such an effect of GnRH antagonist treatment on the growing follicle may well partially reflect a local decrease in available VEGF. The hormonal environments after GnRH antagonist and anti-VEGF antibody treatment, however, are quite different. Gonadotropin levels are obviously suppressed after antagonist administration (22), whereas our data show a short-term increase in FSH release after anti-VEGF antibody treatment, presumably associated with a decrease in E2 levels and the parallel decline in the negative feedback activity of the steroid.
Although the normal late follicular rise in E2 is interrupted in monkeys receiving anti-VEGF antibodies, it is unlikely that the selected maturing follicle is destroyed in this process, because some degree of E2 secretion persists. Once E2 secretion resumes, the ovulatory LH surge follows without delay in most monkeys, as it does in the normal cycle. Thus, we speculate that anti-VEGF antibody treatment interferes temporarily with normal vascularization function in the selected maturing follicle and that this follicle can be maintained for several days in a suspended state. Data obtained after a 4-day GnRH antagonist treatment in the human also support a temporary suspension of follicle growth, as monitored by ultrasonographic measurements of follicular diameter (21, 22). Such studies remain to be performed in our experimental model.
This report on the effectiveness of an anti-VEGF antibody to interfere with normal follicular development in the rhesus parallels data in the marmoset monkey showing interference with normal luteal phase function after VEGF neutralization (24). Treatment with VEGF-blocking antibodies in the luteal phase decreases endothelial cell proliferation, blocks development of the extensive capillary bed, and interferes with normal luteal function, as judged by decreasing secretion of progesterone, presumably as a result of the reduction in the microvasculature. Similar results were reported in the PMS/hCG-treated rat (25). However, because in the rodent model the long-term anti-VEGF antibody treatment was started before initiation of follicular stimulation, it is difficult to separate interference with follicular maturation from luteal inhibition by the treatment. Yet, it is important to note that in our own data from the primate, short-term neutralization of VEGF during the follicular phase does not interfere with ovulation and corpus luteum function, as demonstrated by mean integrated luteal progesterone levels similar to those in the control menstrual cycles.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that the angiogenic factor VEGF is a crucial physiological component in the process of follicular growth in the nonhuman primate. A significant delay in completion of the follicular phase occurs when VEGF activity is neutralized. Our data also indicate that the menstrual cycles that follow the treatment cycle are normal, suggesting that the inhibition of ovarian function by this antiangiogenic compound is temporary.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received June 9, 2000.
Revised October 4, 2000.
Accepted October 13, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Abramovich, A. R. Celin, F. Hernandez, M. Tesone, and F. Parborell Spatiotemporal analysis of the protein expression of angiogenic factors and their related receptors during folliculogenesis in rats with and without hormonal treatment Reproduction, February 1, 2009; 137(2): 309 - 320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Soares, R. Gomez, C. Simon, J. A. Garcia-Velasco, and A. Pellicer Targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor system to prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome Hum. Reprod. Update, April 2, 2008; (2008) dmn008v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Alvarez, I. Alonso-Muriel, G. Garcia, J. Crespo, J. Bellver, C. Simon, and A. Pellicer Implantation is apparently unaffected by the dopamine agonist Cabergoline when administered to prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women undergoing assisted reproduction treatment: a pilot study Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2007; 22(12): 3210 - 3214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.D. Taylor, H. Wilson, S.G. Hillier, S.J. Wiegand, and H.M. Fraser Effects of inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor at time of selection on follicular angiogenesis, expansion, development and atresia in the marmoset Mol. Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2007; 13(10): 729 - 736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. T. Grazul-Bilska, C. Navanukraw, M. L. Johnson, K. A. Vonnahme, S. P. Ford, L. P. Reynolds, and D. A. Redmer Vascularity and expression of angiogenic factors in bovine dominant follicles of the first follicular wave J Anim Sci, August 1, 2007; 85(8): 1914 - 1922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Sengupta, P G L Lalitkumar, A R Najwa, D S Charnock-Jones, A L Evans, A M Sharkey, S K Smith, and D Ghosh Immunoneutralization of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibits pregnancy establishment in the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) Reproduction, June 1, 2007; 133(6): 1199 - 1211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Russell and R. L. Robker Molecular mechanisms of ovulation: co-ordination through the cumulus complex Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2007; 13(3): 289 - 312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Roberts, L. K. Arbogast, C. I. Friedman, D. E. Cohn, P. T. Kaumaya, and D. R. Danforth Neutralization of Endogenous Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Depletes Primordial Follicles in the Mouse Ovary Biol Reprod, February 1, 2007; 76(2): 218 - 223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Gomez, M. Gonzalez-Izquierdo, R. C. Zimmermann, E. Novella-Maestre, I. Alonso-Muriel, J. Sanchez-Criado, J. Remohi, C. Simon, and A. Pellicer Low-Dose Dopamine Agonist Administration Blocks Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)-Mediated Vascular Hyperpermeability without Altering VEGF Receptor 2-Dependent Luteal Angiogenesis in a Rat Ovarian Hyperstimulation Model Endocrinology, November 1, 2006; 147(11): 5400 - 5411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. M. Fraser, H. Wilson, K. D. Morris, I. Swanston, and S. J. Wiegand Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Trap Suppresses Ovarian Function at All Stages of the Luteal Phase in the Macaque J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2005; 90(10): 5811 - 5818. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Xu and R. L. Stouffer Local Delivery of Angiopoietin-2 into the Preovulatory Follicle Terminates the Menstrual Cycle in Rhesus Monkeys Biol Reprod, June 1, 2005; 72(6): 1352 - 1358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Manenti, E. Riccardi, S. Marchini, E. Naumova, I. Floriani, A. Garofalo, R. Dossi, E. Marrazzo, D. Ribatti, E. Scanziani, et al. Circulating plasma vascular endothelial growth factor in mice bearing human ovarian carcinoma xenograft correlates with tumor progression and response to therapy Mol. Cancer Ther., May 1, 2005; 4(5): 715 - 725. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. M. Fraser, H. Wilson, J. S. Rudge, and S. J. Wiegand Single Injections of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Trap Block Ovulation in the Macaque and Produce a Prolonged, Dose-Related Suppression of Ovarian Function J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2005; 90(2): 1114 - 1122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.S. RUDGE, G. THURSTON, S. DAVIS, N. PAPADOPOULOS, N. GALE, S.J. WIEGAND, and G.D. YANCOPOULOS VEGF Trap as a Novel Antiangiogenic Treatment Currently in Clinical Trials for Cancer and Eye Diseases, and VelociGene(R)- based Discovery of the Next Generation of Angiogenesis Targets Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, January 1, 2005; 70(0): 411 - 418. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P D Taylor, S G Hillier, and H M Fraser Effects of GnRH antagonist treatment on follicular development and angiogenesis in the primate ovary J. Endocrinol., October 1, 2004; 183(1): 1 - 17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Ferrara Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor: Basic Science and Clinical Progress Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2004; 25(4): 581 - 611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Greenaway, K. Connor, H. G. Pedersen, B. L. Coomber, J. LaMarre, and J. Petrik Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Its Receptor, Flk-1/KDR, Are Cytoprotective in the Extravascular Compartment of the Ovarian Follicle Endocrinology, June 1, 2004; 145(6): 2896 - 2905. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Ferrara, G. Frantz, J. LeCouter, L. Dillard-Telm, T. Pham, A. Draksharapu, T. Giordano, and F. Peale Differential Expression of the Angiogenic Factor Genes Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) and Endocrine Gland-Derived VEGF in Normal and Polycystic Human Ovaries Am. J. Pathol., June 1, 2003; 162(6): 1881 - 1893. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Danforth, L. K. Arbogast, S. Ghosh, A. Dickerman, R. Rofagha, and C. I. Friedman Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Stimulates Preantral Follicle Growth in the Rat Ovary Biol Reprod, May 1, 2003; 68(5): 1736 - 1741. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Shimizu, J.-Y. Jiang, H. Sasada, and E. Sato Changes of Messenger RNA Expression of Angiogenic Factors and Related Receptors During Follicular Development in Gilts Biol Reprod, December 1, 2002; 67(6): 1846 - 1852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Zimmermann, E. Xiao, P. Bohlen, and M. Ferin Administration of Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2 Antibody in the Early Follicular Phase Delays Follicular Selection and Development in the Rhesus Monkey Endocrinology, July 1, 2002; 143(7): 2496 - 2502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Wulff, H. Wilson, S. J. Wiegand, J. S. Rudge, and H. M. Fraser Prevention of Thecal Angiogenesis, Antral Follicular Growth, and Ovulation in the Primate by Treatment with Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Trap R1R2 Endocrinology, July 1, 2002; 143(7): 2797 - 2807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. R. Nayak and R. M. Brenner Vascular Proliferation and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Expression in the Rhesus Macaque Endometrium J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2002; 87(4): 1845 - 1855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |