help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meirhaeghe, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wareham, N. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meirhaeghe, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wareham, N. J.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 86, No. 12 5881-5887
Copyright © 2001 by The Endocrine Society


Other Original Articles

The Effect of the Gly16Arg Polymorphism of the ß2-Adrenergic Receptor Gene on Plasma Free Fatty Acid Levels Is Modulated by Physical Activity

Aline Meirhaeghe, Jian’an Luan, Paul Selberg-Franks, Susie Hennings, Jo Mitchell, David Halsall, Stephen O’Rahilly and Nicholas J. Wareham

Departments of Medicine (A.M., S.O.), Clinical Biochemistry (A.M., D.H., S.O.), and Public Health and Primary Care (J.L., P.S.-F., S.H., J.M., N.J.W.), University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 2SR, United Kingdom

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Nicholas J. Wareham, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 2SR, United Kingdom.

Abstract

The lipolytic effects of catecholamines are mediated through members of the ß2-adrenergic receptor (BAR-2) family. Previous studies have suggested that genetic variants in the BAR-2 gene may be associated with obesity in some populations. To our knowledge, no studies have directly examined the effects of this polymorphism on circulating nonesterified fatty acid (NEFA) levels. To explore this issue further, a cohort of 604 Caucasian individuals (aged 40–65 yr) was genotyped for a common polymorphism in the BAR-2 gene (Gly16Arg), and the relationships between genotype, body mass index (BMI), NEFA, and lipid levels were examined. Women bearing the Arg16 allele had higher BMI values (P < 0.01) than Gly16Gly women. Women carriers of the Arg16Arg genotype had lower fasting plasma NEFAs (P < 0.01) and greater suppression of NEFAs (P < 0.01) after an oral glucose load than women bearing the Gly16 allele. In multivariate analysis after adjustment for age, sex, and smoking status, the interaction between the BAR-2 genotype and BMI in determining fasting NEFA concentrations was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The availability of objective measures of total energy expenditure in this population permitted the further examination of interactions, particularly that between genotype and physical activity. In the population as a whole, after adjustment for confounding by age, smoking, and BMI, the effect of the Arg16Arg genotype on the suppression of NEFA levels was modified by physical activity level (P for interaction <0.05). These data suggest the existence in this population of a gene-physical activity interaction on NEFA levels.

THE ß2-ADRENERGIC RECEPTORS (BAR-2) bind the endogenous catecholamines epinephrine and norepinephrine and transfer the signals to the interior of cells via the stimulatory guanine nucleotide-binding protein, Gs (1). The three ß-adrenergic receptors (ß1-, ß2-, and ß3-), all of which are expressed in adipocytes, stimulate lipolysis, whereas the {alpha}2 receptor inhibits it. Several polymorphisms of the human BAR-2 gene have been described, including two common ones in the extracellular domain of the receptor, Gly16Arg and Gln27Glu. The BAR-2 gene contains a short open reading frame located 102 bp upstream of the receptor coding block called the 5' leader cistron, which encodes a 19-amino acid peptide that inhibits the cellular expression of the BAR-2 by obstructing the translation of its mRNA (2). A common polymorphism at the last amino acid of this 5' leader cistron, Cys19Arg, has also been reported.

Each of these three BAR-2 polymorphisms is known to be functionally relevant. When compared with the Arg16 receptor, the Gly16 receptor has been reported to undergo significantly greater down-regulation after prolonged agonist stimulation in vitro (3, 4). The receptor with the Glu27 allele does not appear to be expressed in the fully mature form on Western blots (3). The Cys19Arg polymorphism in the 5' leader cistron results in an approximately 2-fold lower expression of the BAR-2 receptor at a translational level (5).

Of note, given the role of ß-adrenergic receptors in the control of lipolysis, several studies have reported associations between polymorphisms in the BAR-2 gene and obesity (6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13). However, this association has not been detected in all studies reported to date (14, 15, 16). Other studies have reported that polymorphisms in the BAR-2 gene might influence the effects of physical activity (11) or diet (17) in the determination of body fat mass.

Although a direct functional effect of these polymorphisms on adipocyte lipolysis appears plausible, none of the previous studies have directly examined the association between these polymorphisms and in vivo measures of circulating free fatty acids. We therefore examined this association in the Ely Study, a population-based cohort study in which measures of fasting and postglucose load nonesterified fatty acid (NEFA) concentrations were available (18, 19, 20, 21). This study is also unique because physical activity has been assessed using an objective and quantitative method rather than simple self-reported behavior (22, 23, 24). The ability to detect gene-environment interactions is highly dependent not only upon the strength of the interaction, but also on the precision with which the environmental exposure is measured (25). Therefore, the detection of such interactions in this study is aided by the use of heart rate monitoring with individual calibration, a method previously validated against the gold standard techniques of doubly labeled water and whole body calorimetry (26, 27). The technique relies on the fact that there is a definable linear relationship between heart rate and oxygen consumption, and therefore energy expenditure, above a critical level (the flex heart rate) below which energy expenditure can be assumed to be equal to resting. As an objective, cheap, and noninvasive method, it is, therefore, potentially suitable for small and medium-sized epidemiological studies in which prospective assessment of energy expenditure is required (28, 29).

Materials and Methods

The Ely Study

Selection of the subjects and metabolic tests. The volunteers were all participants in the Isle of Ely Study, a continuing population-based cohort study in Ely, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom, the design of which has been described previously (19, 21). The original sample of 1122 individuals without known diabetes were recruited between 1990 and 1992 at random from a population-based sampling frame consisting of all people in Ely, aged 40–65 yr in 1990 (19). The initial response rate was 74%. Fifty-one individuals were found to have prevalent but undiagnosed diabetes (19). Between 1994 and 1997, a second examination was performed at a 4.5-yr interval in all those individuals who did not have diabetes by World Health Organization criteria at baseline (n = 1071). Twenty subjects had died in the interim, and 937 of the remaining volunteers attended the second examination (89% restudy rate) (21). These individuals constituted the sample for this particular study. Because this analysis was focused on the effects of the BAR-2 polymorphism, we excluded individuals from the analysis if they were being treated with ß-blockers at any stage in this study.

At each phase of the study, volunteers attended the clinic at 0830 h, having fasted since 2200 h the previous evening, and underwent a standard 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Blood samples were taken at fasting and 30 and 120 min after oral glucose. Plasma glucose was measured in the routine National Health Service laboratory at Addenbrooke’s Hospital using the hexokinase method and triglycerides measured using the RA 1000 (Bayer Corp., Basingstoke, UK), with a standard enzymatic method. Plasma specific insulin was determined by two-site immunometric assays with either 125I or alkaline phosphatase labels. Cross-reactivity was less than 0.2% with intact proinsulin at 400 pmol/liter and less than 1% with 32–33 split proinsulin at 400pmol/liter. Interassay coefficients of variation were 6.6% at 28.6 pmol/liter (n = 99), 4.8% at 153.1 pmol/liter (n = 102), and 6.0% at 436.7 pmol/liter (n = 99), respectively. The 30-min insulin incremental response is used in the analysis as a measure of insulin secretion, because validation studies comparing this derived measure with the 3-min insulin concentration in an iv glucose tolerance test have shown high correlations (0.55 in normoglycaemic individuals and 0.69 in those with impaired glucose tolerance (30). Plasma NEFA measurements were determined enzymatically on the basis of the activity of acyl-CoA synthetase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Lewes, Sussex). The resultant acyl-CoA is oxidized to yield hydrogen peroxide, which is measured colormetrically. NEFA concentrations were measured in time 0, 30- and 120-min samples during the OGTT in both phases of the study. NEFA area under the curve (AUC) was calculated as a measure of the overall NEFA response during the OGTT and was defined as the area under the trapezoid described by the NEFA measurements at time 0, 30 and 120 min (18, 20). The units of this measure are millimoles per liter per hour. Height and weight were measured in light clothing. Body circumferences were measured in duplicate using a metal tape. Ethical permission for the study was granted by the Cambridge Local Research Ethics Committee.

Assessment of resting and exercise oxygen consumption–heart rate relationship. The protocol for undertaking the individual calibration between heart rate and energy expenditure has been reported previously (22, 28, 29). The oxygen consumption–heart rate relationship was assessed at rest with the subject lying prone and then seated, using an oxygen analyser calibrated daily using 100% nitrogen and fresh air as standard gases. Subjects bicycled on a cycle ergometer at several different workloads to provide the slope and the intercept of the line relating energy expenditure to heart rate. Each subject cycled at 50 rpm, and the workload was progressively increased from 0 W, through 37.5, 75, and 125 W in stages each lasting 5 min. At each workload, three separate readings were made of heart rate, minute volume, and expired air oxygen concentration. The 125-W level was undertaken only if the heart rate had not reached 120 beats per minute by the end of the 5 min at 75 W. The oxygen concentration in the expired air and minute volume data were used to calculate oxygen consumption after correction for standard temperature and pressure. Energy expenditure (kilojoules per minute) was calculated at each time point as oxygen consumption (milliliters per minute) x 20.35 (31). Mean resting energy expenditure was taken as the average of the lying and sitting values. The slope and intercept of the least-squares regression line of the exercise points were calculated. Flex heart rate was calculated as the mean of the highest resting pulse rate and the lowest on exercise. This point was used in the analysis of heart rate data to discriminate between rest and exercise. Below this point, energy expenditure was assumed to be equivalent to rest. Above it, it was predicted from the slope and intercept of the regression line that was calculated during the exercise test. O2max was measured from the linear regression as predicted oxygen consumption at maximal heart rate (220 - age) and is expressed in the results per unit body weight. The volunteers wore the heart rate monitor (Polar Electro, Kempele, Finland) continuously during the waking hours over the following 4 d. Heart rate readings were directly downloaded into a computer via a serial interface, and the individual calibration data were used to predict minute energy expenditure for each person. Sleeping energy expenditure was calculated as 95% of basal metabolic rate, where this was derived from published prediction equations (32, 33). A physical activity level (PAL), which is the ratio of total energy expenditure to basal metabolic rate, was computed for each day and averaged over the 4-d period.

Genetic analyses

DNA was extracted from white blood cells. The Gly16Arg polymorphism was amplified by PCR using the following oligonucleotides: (sense) 5'-CTT CTT GCT GGC ACG CAA T-3' and (antisense) 5'-CCA GTG AAG TGA TGA AGT AGT TGG-3. The PCR was performed with 0.5 mM MgCl2 and 30 cycles of (94 C 1 min, 56 C 1 min, and 72 C 1 min), generating a 200-bp amplicon. This PCR product was digested with BsrDI at 65 C (the Gly16 allele is distinguished by two bands at 130 and 70 bp; the Arg16 allele by three bands at 22, 108, and 70 bp).

Statistical analyses

The means and SD of anthropometric and physical activity data were calculated by genotype, and comparison between genotypes was analyzed by comparison of means for recessive and dominant models separately. Comparison of the proportion of current, ex-smokers, and nonsmokers between genotype was performed by the {chi}2 test. The dataset includes repeated measures, and therefore the mean within an individual over the two repeats is a closer representation of the usual level than either value separately. We compared the adjusted means of the repeated data across individuals stratified by genotype after adjustment for age and smoking status. The adjustment was undertaken using ANOVA. Those variables that were not normally distributed were normalized by logarithmic transformation and are presented in the results as geometric means. We undertook a similar analysis including body mass index (BMI) as a covariate. These multivariate analyses were undertaken using the repeated observations in the Mixed Model procedure MIXED in SAS (SAS System for Windows, version 6.12, SAS Institute, Cary, NC). A mixed model is used to describe the variance-covariance structure of responses at successive time points and to estimate the corresponding parameters along with fixed effects. Fixed effects include factors like the genotype, and the model allows for time-dependent covariates such as BMI. Finally, we examined the possibility of an interaction between physical activity and genotype. Because the physical activity data were only collected at the second visit, this particular multivariate model included the data from the second visit only.

Results

In this population, the Arg16 allele was common (35%) and was found in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The characteristics of the participants stratified by sex and by genotype for Gly16Arg polymorphism are shown in Table 1Go. There was no statistically significant difference in BMI or waist to hip ratio (WHR) between genotypes in men. However, in women BMI was significantly greater in carriers of the Arg allele. There were no differences between genotypes in the proportion of smokers, nor in PAL or cardiorespiratory fitness. The association between genotype and various anthropometric and biochemical parameters stratified by sex is shown in Table 2Go after adjustment for age and cigarette smoking. The higher BMI in women carriers of the Arg16 allele persisted after adjustment for age and cigarette smoking status (P < 0.01 in a dominant model). However, NEFA concentrations at fasting and 30 min and NEFA AUC were all significantly lower in women who were homozygous for the Arg16 allele (P < 0.01), suggesting an interaction between genotype and obesity in determining NEFA levels. The effect on neither BMI nor NEFA concentrations was apparent in the men. Other differences between groups were only significant at the 5% level, and given the number of statistical comparisons undertaken in Table 2Go, differences at this level should be interpreted with caution. There was no interaction between overall and central obesity in determining NEFA levels. In multivariate analysis, after adjustment for age, sex, and smoking status, a significant interaction between the BAR-2 genotype and BMI was demonstrated for fasting NEFA (P < 0.05) and total NEFA AUC (P < 0.05).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Unadjusted mean anthropometric and physical activity characteristics stratified by sex and genotype for the Gly16Arg polymorphism in the BAR-2: the Ely Study (n = 604)

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Mean anthropometric, biochemical, and physical activity characteristics adjusted for age and smoking, and stratified by sex and genotype for the Gly16Arg polymorphism in the BAR-2: the Ely Study (n = 604)

 
Because the apparent effect on NEFA levels in women could be either direct or indirect via obesity, we repeated the multivariate analyses using BMI as a covariate in addition to age and smoking (Table 3Go). The previously demonstrated differences in NEFA concentrations in women by genotype were unaffected by the addition of BMI as a covariate, suggesting that the apparent association had not arisen through confounding by obesity. Because of the previously demonstrated interaction between this polymorphism and physical activity, we examined the possibility of this gene-physical activity interaction in separate multivariate models for the NEFA concentration at each time point in the OGTT, including age, BMI, sex, and smoking as covariates. In these models, the interaction term between the genotype and BMI was not significant and was not included. Table 4Go shows the regression coefficients for the different terms in these models, showing that there is a statistically significant interaction between the genotype and the PAL in determining both NEFA AUC and the 30 min NEFA concentration. Although the interaction term was not significant for the fasting NEFA, the direction of the interaction was similar, and its magnitude was comparable. The interactions are displayed graphically in Fig. 1Go, which demonstrates how at high PAL, individuals who are homozygous for the Arg16 allele have lower levels of NEFA at fasting and 30 min and total NEFA AUC. The differences between genotype are less apparent at low PAL. In an analysis stratified by sex, the interaction term was stronger in men than in women, but because men have higher values of physical activity, more of the data in the male population lies in the range where the interaction is apparent.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Mean biochemical data adjusted for age, BMI, and smoking, and stratified by sex and genotype for the Gly16Arg polymorphism in the BAR-2: the Ely Study (n = 604)

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Parameter estimates in the interaction study (recessive model) from the repeated multivariate analysis with fasting NEFA, NEFA at 30 and 120 min, and NEFA AUC as outcome variable (follow-up data only): the Ely Study (n = 604)

 


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Interaction between PAL and BAR-2 genotype on plasma NEFAs. The Ely Study (n = 604).

 
Discussion

In this study, women carriers of the Arg16 variant of the BAR-2 gene were characterized by higher BMI, but those who were homozygous for Arg16 had lower fasting plasma NEFA concentrations and lower NEFA AUC during the OGTT. Given the overall positive relationship between obesity and NEFA concentrations (20), one would have expected those with the Arg 16 allele to have higher levels. Thus, these observations initially suggested an interaction between the BAR-2 genotype and obesity, an interaction that was statistically significant when tested for in multivariate analysis. However, when physical activity was included in the models, the interaction between BAR-2 and obesity was no longer significant, whereas that between the genotype and physical activity was. Thus the differences between groups in NEFA concentrations can be explained on the basis of an interaction between the habitual level of physical activity and the BAR-2 genotype, with those who are homozygous for the Arg16 variant having lower levels of NEFA when they are more physically active.

It is difficult to explain these phenotypic characteristics with the functional data previously published on the Gly16Arg polymorphism. First, it has been shown that the receptor undergoes a greater down-regulation after prolonged agonist stimulation with the Gly16 allele (less receptor number) than the Arg16 allele (4). In accordance with this result, Martinez et al. (34) reported that children with or without asthma and Arg16Arg homozygous showed more often (five times) a positive response to the bronchodilator albuterol than Gly16Gly carriers. On the other hand, Large et al. (6) showed that adipocytes from subjects carrying the Gly16 allele displayed a 5-fold better sensitivity to terbutaline than Arg16Arg subjects, but the maximum lipolytic action was similar in both groups. More recently, it has been shown that Arg16Arg asthmatic subjects who had regularly used albuterol had a decline in the peak expiratory flow (35). This decline was not observed in asthmatic subjects with other genotypes, and this suggests that the Arg16Arg patients exhibit a tachyphylactic effect to albuterol, maybe because their receptors have not yet been down-regulated. Our study shows that Arg16Arg women have lower plasma NEFAs and greater NEFA suppression after glucose load than other women, and it may be that the catecholamine-induced lipolysis is less efficient in Arg16Arg women. However, it is impossible on the basis of the data in this study alone to determine whether the lower NEFA levels are the product of diminished release or enhanced clearance.

The univariate associations between the BAR-2 polymorphism and body weight, BMI, and plasma lipids were only seen in women. Many studies reported sex- and fat regional-related differences in lipolysis (36), and some have suggested sex differences in insulin-mediated NEFA metabolism (37). An alternative explanation for the difference between men and women is that the interaction between the Gly16Arg polymorphism and physical activity is stronger in men. We have shown in the context of the interaction between the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma}-gene and the ratio of polyunsaturated to saturated fat in the diet that interaction can obscure a main genetic effect if it is not taken into account (38). Because the interaction in this study is stronger in men than in women, it follows that the likelihood of the interaction obscuring the genetic effect would also be greater in men.

The Ely population is unique in the fact that direct measurements of free living energy expenditure have been undertaken in a large population-based cohort. This provides unprecedented opportunities for the examination of interactions between genotype and physical activity. Although a previous study had suggested an interaction between the BAR-2 locus and questionnaire-based measures of physical activity in the determination of BMI (11), we were unable to show such an interaction using the direct measures of physical activity undertaken in this study. This result is not surprising because we could not find an association between the BAR-2 polymorphism and obesity per se in the present study. However, we did find that the effect of the Gly16Arg polymorphism on NEFA levels was modulated by physical activity, with the effects of the Arg16 variant being accentuated by high PAL. The effects of physical activity on NEFA levels are complex. Acute exercise promotes lipolysis, initiating the release of energy-rich fatty acids from adipocytes (39). However, the use of NEFAs is also increased, an effect that persists for up to several days after exercise (40, 41). The chronic effects of physical activity on NEFA concentrations have been studied in small-scale studies comparing trained and untrained individuals (42), but larger studies in population-based samples have not previously been undertaken, principally because of the difficulties of assessing usual physical activity.

In summary, we have demonstrated that variation at codon 16 in the BAR-2 gene is associated with alterations in fasting and postglucose load NEFA levels and a moderate effect on body weight in women. The finding of a significant interaction between genotype and direct measurement of physical activity demonstrates the importance of considering gene-environment interaction when examining the polygenic determinants of human metabolic variation.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the staff of the St. Mary’s Street Surgery (Ely, Cambridgeshire, UK) and to H. Shannasy, S. Curran, P. Murgatroyd, and Drs. M. Hennings and A. M. Prentice for their help with the fieldwork for this study. The staff of the Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Addenbrooke’s Hospital (Cambridge, UK), led by Prof. C. N. Hales, performed the biochemical analyses.

Footnotes

This work is supported by a program grant from the Medical Research Council (MRC) of the United Kingdom (to S.O.). The Ely Study was funded by the British Diabetic Association, the Anglia and Oxford Regional Health Authority, and the MRC. A.M. is funded by the Marie Curie Association. P.S.-F. is an MRC Ph.D. student. N.J.W. is an MRC Clinician Scientist Fellow.

Abbreviations: AUC, Area under the curve; BAR-2, ß2-adrenergic receptor; BMI, body mass index; NEFA, nonesterified fatty acid; OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test; PAL, physical activity level; WHR, waist to hip ratio.

Received January 24, 2001.

Accepted August 31, 2001.

References

  1. Dohlman HG, Thorner J, Caron MG, Lefkowitz RJ 1991 Model systems for the study of seven-transmembrane-segment receptors. Annu Rev Biochem 60:653–688[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Parola AL, Kobilka BK 1994 The peptide product of a 5' leader cistron in the beta 2 adrenergic receptor mRNA inhibits receptor synthesis. J Biol Chem 269:4497–4505[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Green SA, Turki J, Innis M, Liggett SB 1994 Amino-terminal polymorphisms of the human beta 2-adrenergic receptor impart distinct agonist-promoted regulatory properties. Biochemistry 33:9414–9419[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Green SA, Turki J, Bejarano P, Hall IP, Liggett SB 1995 Influence of beta 2-adrenergic receptor genotypes on signal transduction in human airway smooth muscle cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 13:25–33[Abstract]
  5. McGraw DW, Forbes SL, Kramer LA, Liggett SB 1998 Polymorphisms of the 5' leader cistron of the human beta2-adrenergic receptor regulate receptor expression. J Clin Invest 102:1927–1932[Medline]
  6. Large V, Hellstrom L, Reynisdottir S, Lonnqvist F, Eriksson P, Lannfelt L, Arner P 1997 Human beta-2 adrenoceptor gene polymorphisms are highly frequent in obesity and associate with altered adipocyte beta-2 adrenoceptor function. J Clin Invest 100:3005–3013[Medline]
  7. Hellstrom L, Large V, Reynisdottir S, Wahrenberg H, Arner P 1999 The different effects of a Gln27Glu beta 2-adrenoceptor gene polymorphism on obesity in males and in females. J Intern Med 245:253–259[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Ishiyama-Shigemoto S, Yamada K, Yuan X, Ichikawa F, Nonaka K 1999 Association of polymorphisms in the beta2-adrenergic receptor gene with obesity, hypertriglyceridaemia, and diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 42:98–101[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Yamada K, Ishiyama-Shigemoto S, Ichikawa F, Yuan X, Koyanagi A, Koyama W, Nonaka K 1999 Polymorphism in the 5'-leader cistron of the beta2-adrenergic receptor gene associated with obesity and type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:1754–1757[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Mori Y, Kim-Motoyama H, Ito Y, Katakura T, Yasuda K, Ishiyama-Shigemoto S, Yamada K, Akanuma Y, Ohashi Y, Kimura S, Yazaki Y, Kadowaki T 1999 The Gln27Glu beta2-adrenergic receptor variant is associated with obesity due to subcutaneous fat accumulation in Japanese men. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 258:138–140[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Meirhaeghe A, Helbecque N, Cottel D, Amouyel P 1999 Beta2-adrenoceptor gene polymorphism, body weight, and physical activity. Lancet 353:896[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Meirhaeghe A, Helbecque N, Cottel D, Amouyel P 2000 Impact of polymorphisms of the human beta2-adrenoceptor gene on obesity in a French population. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 24:382–387[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Ehrenborg E, Skogsberg J, Ruotolo G, Large V, Eriksson P, Arner P, Hamsten A 2000 The Q/E27 polymorphism in the beta2-adrenoceptor gene is associated with increased body weight and dyslipoproteinaemia involving triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. J Intern Med 247:651–656[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Echwald SM, Sorensen TI, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Andersen T, Pedersen O 1998 Gln27Glu variant of the human beta2-adrenoreceptor gene is not associated with early-onset obesity in Danish men. Diabetes 47:1657–1658[Medline]
  15. Kortner B, Wolf A, Wendt D, Beisiegel U, Evans D 1999 Lack of association between a human beta-2 adrenoceptor gene polymorphism (gln27glu) and morbid obesity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 23:1099–1100[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Oberkofler H, Esterbauer H, Hell E, Krempler F, Patsch W 2000 The Gln27Glu polymorphism in the beta2-adrenergic receptor gene is not associated with morbid obesity in Austrian women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 24:388–390[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Sakane N, Yoshida T, Umekawa T, Kogure A, Kondo M 1999 Beta2-adrenoceptor gene polymorphism and obesity. Lancet 353:1976[Medline]
  18. Byrne CD, Wareham NJ, Brown DC, Clark PM, Cox LJ, Day NE, Palmer CR, Wang TW, Williams DR, Hales CN 1994 Hypertriglyceridaemia in subjects with normal and abnormal glucose tolerance: relative contributions of insulin secretion, insulin resistance and suppression of plasma non-esterified fatty acids. Diabetologia 37:889–896[Medline]
  19. Williams DR, Wareham NJ, Brown DC, Byrne CD, Clark PM, Cox BD, Cox LJ, Day NE, Hales CN, Palmer CR, Shackleton JR, Wang TWM 1995 Undiagnosed glucose intolerance in the community: the Isle of Ely Diabetes Project. Diabet Med 12:30–35[Medline]
  20. Byrne CD, Wareham NJ, Day NE, McLeish R, Williams DR, Hales CN 1995 Decreased non-esterified fatty acid suppression and features of the insulin resistance syndrome occur in a sub-group of individuals with normal glucose tolerance. Diabetologia 38:1358–1366[Medline]
  21. Wareham NJ, Byrne CD, Williams R, Day NE, Hales CN 1999 Fasting proinsulin concentrations predict the development of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 22:262–270[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Wareham NJ, Hennings SJ, Prentice AM, Day NE 1997 Feasibility of heart-rate monitoring to estimate total level and pattern of energy expenditure in a population-based epidemiological study: the Ely Young Cohort Feasibility Study 1994–5 [comments]. Br J Nutr 78:889–900[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Wareham NJ, Hennings SJ, Byrne CD, Hales CN, Prentice AM, Day NE 1998 A quantitative analysis of the relationship between habitual energy expenditure, fitness and the metabolic cardiovascular syndrome. Br J Nutr 80:235–241[Medline]
  24. Wareham NJ, Rennie KL 1998 The assessment of physical activity in individuals and populations: why try to be more precise about how physical activity is assessed? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 22(Suppl 2):S30–38
  25. Luan JA, Wong MY, Day NE, Wareham NJ 2001 Sample size determination for studies of gene-environment interaction. Int J Epidemiol 30:1035–1040[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Ceesay SM, Prentice AM, Day KC, Murgatroyd PR, Goldberg GR, Scott W, Spurr GB 1989 The use of heart rate monitoring in the estimation of energy expenditure: a validation study using indirect whole-body calorimetry. Br J Nutr 61:175–186[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Spurr GB, Prentice AM, Murgatroyd PR, Goldberg GR, Reina JC, Christman NT 1988 Energy expenditure from minute-by-minute heart-rate recording: comparison with indirect calorimetry. Am J Clin Nutr 48:552–559[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Wareham NJ, Wong MY, Day NE 2000 Glucose intolerance and physical inactivity: the relative importance of low habitual energy expenditure and cardiorespiratory fitness. Am J Epidemiol 152:132–139[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Wareham NJ, Wong MY, Hennings S, Mitchell J, Rennie K, Cruickshank K, Day NE 2000 Quantifying the association between habitual energy expenditure and blood pressure. Int J Epidemiol 29:655–660[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Phillips DI, Clark PM, Hales CN, Osmond C 1994 Understanding oral glucose tolerance: comparison of glucose or insulin measurements during the oral glucose tolerance test with specific measurements of insulin resistance and insulin secretion. Diabet Med 11:286–292[Medline]
  31. Elia M, Livesey G 1992 Energy expenditure and fuel selection in biological systems: theory and practice of calculations based on indirect calorimetry and tracer methods. World Rev Nutr Diet 70:68–131[Medline]
  32. Goldberg GR, Prentice AM, Davies HL, Murgatroyd PR 1988 Overnight and basal metabolic rates in men and women. Eur J Clin Nutr 42:137–144[Medline]
  33. James W, Schofield E 1990 Human energy requirements. Oxford, UK: Oxford Medical Publications
  34. Martinez FD, Graves PE, Baldini M, Solomon S, Erickson R 1997 Association between genetic polymorphisms of the beta2-adrenoceptor and response to albuterol in children with and without a history of wheezing. J Clin Invest 100:3184–3188[Medline]
  35. Israel E, Drazen JM, Liggett SB, Boushey HA, Cherniack RM, Chinchilli VM, Cooper DM, Fahy JV, Fish JE, Ford JG, Kraft M, Kunselman S, Lazarus SC, Lemanske RF, Martin RJ, McLean DE, Peters SP, Silverman EK, Sorkness CA, Szefler SJ, Weiss ST, Yandava CN 2000 The effect of polymorphisms of the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor on the response to regular use of albuterol in asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162:75–80[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Jensen MD 1997 Lipolysis: contribution from regional fat. Annu Rev Nutr 17:127–139[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Sumner AE, Kushner H, Tulenko TN, Falkner B, Marsh JB 1997 The relationship in African-Americans of sex differences in insulin-mediated suppression of nonesterified fatty acids to sex differences in fasting triglyceride levels. Metabolism 46:400–405[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Luan J, Browne PO, Harding AH, Halsall DJ, O’Rahilly S, Chatterjee VK, Wareham NJ 2001 Evidence for gene-nutrient interaction at the PPARgamma locus. Diabetes 50:686–689[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Ranallo RF, Rhodes EC 1998 Lipid metabolism during exercise. Sports Med 26:29–42[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Aldred HE, Hardman AE, Taylor S 1995 Influence of 12 weeks of training by brisk walking on postprandial lipemia and insulinemia in sedentary middle-aged women. Metabolism 44:390–397[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Tsetsonis NV, Hardman AE 1996 Reduction in postprandial lipemia after walking: influence of exercise intensity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 28:1235–1242[Medline]
  42. Sidossis LS, Wolfe RR, Coggan AR 1998 Regulation of fatty acid oxidation in untrained vs. trained men during exercise. Am J Physiol 274:E510–E515



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
M. Tomaszewski, F. J. Charchar, B. Lacka, U. Pesonen, W. Y.S. Wang, E. Zukowska-Szczechowska, W. Grzeszczak, and A. F. Dominiczak
Epistatic Interaction Between {beta}2-Adrenergic Receptor and Neuropeptide Y Genes Influences LDL-Cholesterol in Hypertension
Hypertension, November 1, 2004; 44(5): 689 - 694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. Dallongeville, N. Helbecque, D. Cottel, P. Amouyel, and A. Meirhaeghe
The Gly16->Arg16 and Gln27->Glu27 Polymorphisms of {beta}2-Adrenergic Receptor Are Associated with Metabolic Syndrome in Men
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2003; 88(10): 4862 - 4866.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
A. C. Pereira, M. S. Floriano, G. F.A. Mota, R. S. Cunha, F. L. Herkenhoff, J. G. Mill, and J. E. Krieger
{beta}2 Adrenoceptor Functional Gene Variants, Obesity, and Blood Pressure Level Interactions in the General Population
Hypertension, October 1, 2003; 42(4): 685 - 692.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. A. Martinez, M. S. Corbalan, A. Sanchez-Villegas, L. Forga, A. Marti, and M. A. Martinez-Gonzalez
Obesity Risk Is Associated with Carbohydrate Intake in Women Carrying the Gln27Glu {beta}2-Adrenoceptor Polymorphism
J. Nutr., August 1, 2003; 133(8): 2549 - 2554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meirhaeghe, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wareham, N. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meirhaeghe, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wareham, N. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals