help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shozu, M.
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shozu, M.
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, M.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 86, No. 11 5405-5411
Copyright © 2001 by The Endocrine Society


Other Original Articles

Inhibition of in Situ Expression of Aromatase P450 in Leiomyoma of the Uterus by Leuprorelin Acetate

Makio Shozu, Hiroshi Sumitani, Tomoya Segawa, Hei-Juan Yang, Kouichi Murakami and Masaki Inoue

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa 920-0934, Japan

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Makio Shozu, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa 920-0934, Japan. E-mail: shozu{at}med.kanazawa-u.ac.jp

Abstract

We have shown that in situ estrogen synthesized in leiomyoma of the uterus plays a possible role in the promotion of leiomyoma cell growth via an autocrine/paracrine mechanism. In the present study, we demonstrated that leuprorelin acetate, a GnRH agonist widely used for treatment of uterine leiomyoma by down-regulation of pituitary-ovarian function, suppressed the expression of aromatase P450 (an estrogen synthetase) in leiomyoma cells. Given the role of in situ estrogen in leiomyoma cell growth, the inhibition of in situ estrogen synthesis may play a role in GnRH agonist-induced rapid regression of leiomyomas. Quantitative RT-PCR revealed that in women receiving no medication uterine leiomyomas express aromatase P450 mRNA at levels 20 times higher than that in the surrounding myometrium. Leuprorelin acetate treatment (1.88 mg every 4 wk, sc injection) for 12–24 wk reduced the expression of aromatase P450 mRNA in leiomyoma tissue as well as in the myometrium, to approximately one tenth of that in the myometrium of untreated women. Suppression of aromatase P450 expression was also demonstrated by Western blot analysis and aromatase activity assay of microsomal fractions prepared from leiomyomas. On the other hand, no differences in the levels of activity and mRNA of aromatase P450 were observed between leiomyoma cells obtained from women treated with and without leuprorelin acetate injections when cells were cultured ex vivo and stimulated by various combinations of stimulants such as dexamethasone + IL-1ß. The addition of various concentrations of E2 did not affect the aromatase activity of leiomyoma cells, suggesting that deprivation of circulating (ovarian) estrogen is not a cause of decreased expression of aromatase during leuprorelin acetate therapy. On the other hand, 8-d treatment with leuprorelin acetate (100 nmol/liter) reduced dexamethasone + IL-1ß-induced activity and a mRNA level of aromatase by 28% and 42%, respectively. These results indicated that leuprorelin acetate inhibits the expression of aromatase P450 in leiomyoma cells, which contributes to the rapid regression of leiomyoma during leuprorelin acetate therapy.

GnRH is a decapeptide that is produced in the hypothalamus and secreted into the portal vein to stimulate gonadotropin release from the pituitary. GnRH is now recognized as a central regulator of the hypothalamus-pituitary-gonadal axis. Recently, the expression of GnRH as well as its receptor was demonstrated in a variety of healthy and diseased extra-pituitary tissues, suggesting autocrine/paracrine roles for GnRH and its receptor at sites distal to the pituitary (1, 2). These extra-pituitary tissues are sex steroid-dependent tissues and their tumors, from such sites as the breast (3), ovary (4, 5), prostate (6), endometrium (7), and placenta (8). Cell lines that established from these tissues also express GnRH, GnRH receptors, or both (2). The physiological role of GnRH and GnRH receptor expression in these extra-pituitary tissue and cells remain to be elucidated. It is, however, widely accepted that GnRH agonists exhibit antiproliferative effects on certain human tumors of the reproductive organs and cells (9, 10, 11, 12). In vitro experiments using cell lines derived from these organs demonstrate that some of these growth inhibitory effects are due to the direct action of the GnRH agonist (7, 13, 14). GnRH agonists have already been applied to the treatment of ovarian cancers, particularly in refractory cases (15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21), and significant reduction in tumor size has been observed in one third of cases treated (10, 22).

GnRH agonists are now widely used for the treatment of leiomyoma of the uterus. In most cases, GnRH agonists decrease the size of uterine leiomyomas by 30% or more within 3–6 months of therapy (23, 24). The underlying rationale of this therapy is that GnRH agonists desensitize pituitary gonadotrophs and reduce ovarian steroids, which in turn induce a reduction in the steroid hormone-dependent growth of leiomyomas. In addition to this indirect mechanism, GnRH agonists may also exhibit direct suppression of cellular growth of leiomyomas, as in the case of malignant tumors described above. Recently, other researchers and we have provided evidence that leiomyomas overexpress aromatase P450, an estrogen synthetase, and actually synthesize sufficiently significant amounts of estrogen to promote their own cell growth (25, 26). In situ estrogen may play a role in the rapid growth of a leiomyoma over the surrounding myometrium. More recently, we found that preoperative treatment with leuprorelin acetate (LA), a GnRH agonist, markedly reduced the expression of aromatase P450 in leiomyomas. This raises the possibility that GnRH agonists inhibit aromatase P450 in leiomyoma cells to reduce production of in situ estrogen, which, in turn, reduces the growth of leiomyoma cells. Thus, suppression of in situ estrogen can be an additional mechanism of GnRH agonist-induced growth retardation of leiomyoma cells. This may also explain why leiomyomas shrink rapidly in women treated with GnRH agonist while the same tumor shows relatively slow regression after natural menopause (27).

In the present study, we demonstrate the inhibitory action of GnRH agonist on the aromatase P450 of leiomyoma cells. We also discuss the role of in situ estrogen on the cellular growth of leiomyoma cells during LA therapy as compared with that after natural menopause.

Materials and Methods

Tissue acquisition

Myometrial tissue was obtained from women at hysterectomy for uterine leiomyoma following approval from the Medical Ethics Committee of Kanazawa University (no. 067). Informed consent was obtained from all 25 patients who were randomly selected and enrolled in this study. Women with evidence of adenomyosis and/or endometriosis at the time of laparotomy were excluded. Leiomyoma specimens were taken from the leiomyomatous tissue just beneath the capsule of the nodule that showed ordinary leiomyomatous histology, with no cellular, epithelioid, bizarre, or plexiform variants. In the case of multiple nodules, leiomyoma specimens were taken from the largest nodule. LA (1.88 mg) was administered by sc injection every 4 wk for 12–24 wk before surgery. Although preoperative LA therapy (LA group) was offered to all patients, 8 of 25 patients rejected LA therapy and were, thus, assigned to the "no LA group." Consequently, differences in the size of the largest nodule (maximum diameter measured before the beginning of LA therapy) and age at laparotomy were not significant between the two groups: 7.4 ± 0.6 cm in the LA group vs. 7.3 ± 0.7 cm in the no LA group and 44.1 ± 0.9 yr old in the LA group vs. 44.9 ± 1.4 yr old in the no LA group, respectively. Durations from the initial injection to the surgery and from the last injection to surgery in the LA group were 15.4 ± 1.4 wk and 12.5 ± 1.6 d, respectively. Tissue samples were dissected immediately after surgery, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and then stored at -76 C. Surrounding myometrium was taken more than 2 cm away from the leiomyoma capsule and treated and stored similarly. Because the level of aromatase P450 mRNA expression did not statistically differ between leiomyomas obtained at the proliferative phase and those at the secretory phase, all patients without LA therapy were included in one group irrespective of the menstrual cycle.

Cell culture

Isolation and culture of smooth muscle-like cells from leiomyoma nodules (leiomyoma cells) and morphological validation of smooth muscle-like cells were performed as described previously (26). Briefly, leiomyoma tissue was minced and digested by collagenase type II (1 mg/ml; Roche, Mannheim, Germany) and deoxyribonuclease I (0.15 mg/ml; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) for 3 h at 37 C with vigorous shaking. Digests were filtrated through three layers of sterile gauze and then cultured in DMEM/F-12 medium supplemented with 10% FBS (Sigma), 100 IU/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 100 µg/ml kanamycin (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD). It took 3–8 d for the freshly isolated cells to reach confluency. The culture was maintained for no more than 4 wk. Cells in culture were confirmed to have the characteristic features of uterine muscle cells: a fusiform shape, expression of smooth muscle-specific {alpha}-actin, and estrogen responsiveness. More than 95% of cells stained positively with smooth muscle-specific {alpha}-actin ({alpha}-smooth muscle actin immunohistology kit; Sigma). All experiments on leiomyoma cells were conducted on first or second passage cells.

RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from snap-frozen tissue samples using an Ultraspec RNA isolation kit (Biotecx, Houston, TX) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA concentration was determined spectrophotometrically. Competitive RT-PCR to quantify the aromatase P450 coding sequence was conducted as described previously (26). Briefly, 1 µg total RNA was combined with a known amount of internal-standard RNA that had 107 bp of wild-type sequence deleted between exon II and III and then reverse-transcribed. The synthesized cDNA representing 25 ng total RNA was PCR-amplified using the primers Arom205 (5'- CTCCTCACTGGCCTTTTTCTC-3') and Arom203 (5'-GCCGAATCGAGAGCTGTAAT-3'). The resultant PCR products were resolved on a 1.5% agarose gel. After staining with ethidium bromide, the gel was photographed and the intensity of the signal was analyzed using the NIH Image program (version 1.61). Densitometric values were normalized to the length of the band. The ratios of the densitometric values of the target to that of the internal standard was used to calculate the amount of aromatase mRNA in a given sample. The standard curves (plots of the logarithmically transformed ratios of the target intensity to the competitor intensity against the log amount of initially added target) showed a significant linear regression over the three-log scale (0.01–24 attomol). Calculated intra-assay and interassay variabilities were 7% and 17%, respectively. Intra-assay variability was calculated as a mean of variability from four different samples assayed in triplicates, and interassay variability was calculated from the results of four independent RT-PCR assay of the same RNA aliquot. Similarly, mRNA of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (G3PDH) was quantitated to monitor the quality of total RNA samples as described elsewhere (26). The PCR primers used were G3PDH1 (5'-CTGAGAACGGGAAGCTTGTCATCAATGG-3') and G3PDH2 (5'-TGTGGTCATGAGTCCTTCCACG- ATACCA-3').

Assay for aromatase activity

The aromatase activity of primary cells was assayed by detecting the formation of tritiated water from [1ß-3H]-androstenedione (NEN Life Science Products, Boston, MA) as described (26, 28, 29). A preliminary experiment showed that aromatase activity measured by this technique increased linearly from a 4- to 12-h incubation with [1ß-3H]-androstenedione. We used a 6-h incubation for the experiment shown in Fig. 5Go and a 12-h incubation for those shown in Figs. 3Go and 4Go to evaluate the basal level of expression as precisely as possible. Aromatase activity was expressed as the rate of incorporation of tritium into water per milligram of protein per 6 or 12 h of incubation. The LA used for cell culture experiment was a kind gift from Takeda Pharmaceutical Company (Osaka, Japan).



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Effect of pretreatment with LA on activity (A), protein concentration (B), and mRNA level (C) of aromatase P450 in leiomyoma cells. A and B, Leiomyoma cells obtained from the no LA group were preincubated in the presence or absence of LA (100 nmol/liter) for 8 d. Twenty-four hours before the end of LA treatment, DEX (25 nmol/liter) + IL-1ß (1 ng/ml) was added and, aromatase activity was measured by a 6-h incubation with [1ß-3H]-androstenedione at the very end of culture. Media containing 0.5% serum was used throughout the experiment, because we had confirmed that 0.5% serum did not affect the basal level of aromatase P450 and was necessary to maintain the cell number. Media was replaced every 2 d. Protein concentrations were determined on the same samples used for measurement of aromatase activity after the removal of media. Data represent the mean ± SEM of four independent experiments. *, P < 0.05 vs. each control that was cultured with LA for the same number of days and was not stimulated with DEX + IL-1ß before aromatase assay; {dagger}, P < 0.05 vs. DEX + IL-1ß-stimulated levels in the group that was not pretreated with LA; §, P < 0.05 vs. DEX + IL-1ß-stimulated levels of the group that were pretreated with vehicle for 8 d. C, Leiomyoma cells obtained from the no LA group were plated on 9-cm wells and were treated with LA for 8 d. At the last 24 h of incubation, DEX (25 nmol/liter) + IL-1ß (1ng/ml) was added to the media as described in A and B. Cells were lysed in 1 ml Ultraspec, and total RNA was extracted. Levels of mRNA containing aromatase-coding sequence were measured by competitive RT-PCR, as described in Materials and Methods. Data from groups treated with LA for 0, 1, and 5 d were not available. Data represent the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. *, P < 0.05 vs. the control that was cultured with LA for 8 d and was not stimulated with DEX + IL-1ß before aromatase assay; §, P < 0.05 vs. the control that were pre-treated with vehicle for 8 d.

 


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Effect of various stimulants on aromatase activity in leiomyoma cells obtained from women preoperatively treated with and without LA. Aromatase activity of leiomyoma cells was measured after a 24-h incubation in the presence of PMA (8 nmol/liter), DEX (25 nmol/liter), IL-1ß (1 ng/ml), PGE2 (50 nmol/liter), or a combination thereof. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM obtained from five and four women from the no LA group and LA group, respectively.

 


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Effect of E2 on aromatase activity of leiomyoma cells obtained from women without preoperative LA therapy. Leiomyoma cells were cultured in media containing 10% of dextran-coated charcoal-treated FBS. Because glucocorticoid is essential for aromatase P450 expression in leiomyoma cells, the media was supplemented with DEX (25 nmol/liter) corresponding to the plasma level of glucocorticoid. After a 24-h incubation with various concentrations of E2, aromatase activity was measured by a 12-h incubation with [1ß-3H]-androstenedione. Media without phenol red was used throughout the experiment. Results represent the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments.

 
To measure aromatase activity of tissue samples, microsomal fractions were prepared from frozen stocks. Tissues samples (~1 g) were homogenized in 5 ml buffer containing 10 mmol/liter PBS (pH 7.4), 150 mmol/liter potassium chloride, 1 mmol/liter EDTA, 2 mmol/liter magnesium chloride, 1 mmol/liter dithiothreitol, 1 mmol/liter phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mmol/liter pepstatin, and 1x Complete (Roche) using a Polytron homonenizer (PT10–35; Kinematica AG, Littau/Luzern, Switzerland). Homogenates were centrifuged at 1,000 x g for 10 min, and the supernatant was then centrifuged for 60 min at 105,000 x g. Resultant pellets were washed twice and resusupended in 200 µl buffer containing 50 mmol/liter PBS (pH 7.4), 20% glycerol, 1 mmol/liter EDTA, and 1 mmol/liter dithiothreitol. A 500-µg sample of microsomal protein was incubated with 1 ml assay buffer containing 50 mmol/liter PBS, 10 mmol/liter NADPH, 4 mmol/liter magnesium chloride, 100 nmol/liter cold androstenedione, and 50 nmol/liter [1ß-3H]-androstenedione. The reaction was initiated by the addition of the mixture of cold and radiolabeled androstenedione at 37 C and stopped after 30 min by the addition of 1 ml 20% trichloroacetic acid. Unused [1ß-3H]-androstenedione was removed from the mixture by chloroform extraction, followed by dextran-coated charcoal adsorption as described for cell samples. Radioactivities of the water phase were measured, and aromatase activity was expressed as the rate of incorporation of tritium into water per milligram of protein per 30 min.

Western blotting

Western blotting and detection of signals were conducted as described (26). Antibody for aromatase was a kind gift from Dr. N. Harada (Fujita Health University, Nagoya, Japan).

Protein quantitation

Cells in 12-well plates were lysed in 1 ml PBS containing 0.5% SDS. Protein concentration was determined using a bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL). The protein concentrations of microsomal fractions were determined from 50-fold dilution of samples.

Statistics

All data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Differences between two groups were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test for unpaired data and the Wilcoxon signed rank test for paired data (StatView 4.0 software; SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC). The effects of LA treatment on aromatase P450 mRNA levels were assessed using a 2 x 2 ANOVA test. Statistical significance was established at the P less than 0.05 level.

Results

Suppression of aromatase P450 expression in tissue samples by preoperative LA therapy

RT-PCR analysis of tissue samples. The level of aromatase P450 mRNA was quantified by competitive RT-PCR (Fig. 1AGo). In women receiving no preoperative LA therapy (no LA group), leiomyomas expressed 20 times more aromatase P450 mRNA than the homologous myometrium did, as seen in our previous study (Fig. 1AGo, two left columns) (26). LA therapy for 12–24 wk (LA group) significantly reduced the expression of aromatase P450 mRNA in both leiomyoma and myometrium tissue (Fig. 1AGo, two right columns), to approximately one tenth of that found in the myometrium of untreated women (Fig. 1AGo, left). After LA therapy, there was no longer any difference in the levels of expression between leiomyoma and the corresponding myometrium samples (Fig. 1AGo, two right columns).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Effect of LA treatment on the expression of aromatase P450 in uterine tissue (A) and leiomyoma cells obtained from leiomyomas (B). A, Level of aromatase P450 coding sequence mRNA in uterine tissue was quantified by competitive RT-PCR, as described in Materials and Methods. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. The number of patients analyzed is given in parentheses. Differences in mRNA levels between leiomyoma and the corresponding myometrium were significant in the nontreated control (no LA group) but not significant in the LA-treated groups (LA group) (Wilcoxon signed rank test). The effect of preoperative LA therapy was statistically significant (P < 0.05, ANOVA test). B, Leiomyoma cells obtained from both the LA group and no LA group were treated with DEX (25 nmol/liter) + IL-1ß (1 ng/ml) for 24 h in serum-free media containing 0.2% BSA. The level of mRNA containing coding sequence of aromatase P450 was quantified by RT-PCR. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. The number of patients analyzed is given in parentheses. Effect of stimulants (DEX + IL-1ß) was significant (P < 0.05, ANOVA test), whereas the effects of preoperative LA therapy was not statistically significant (ANOVA test).

 
Aromatase activity and Western blot analysis of tissue samples. Suppression of aromatase P450 expression by LA therapy was also demonstrated at the protein level. Microsomal fractions were prepared from three leiomyoma samples obtained from both the LA group and no LA group. The amount of aromatase P450 protein was semiquantitated by Western blot analysis and its activity was measured by tritiated water assay. As shown in Fig. 2Go, all three leiomyoma samples from LA group showed lower protein levels as well as activity than the three samples obtained from the no LA group.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Effect of LA therapy on the level of protein and activity of aromatase P450. Three microsomal samples from the LA group and the no LA group were randomly selected and analyzed by Western blotting and tritiated water release assay. The amount of aromatase protein was expressed as densitometric value. Differences between the LA group and no LA group were statistically significant both for protein levels and aromatase activity (P < 0.05 and P < 0.05, respectively, Mann-Whitney U test).

 
Aromatase P450 expression in leiomyoma cells in culture is not altered by preoperative LA therapy

RT-PCR analysis of leiomyoma cells in culture. To examine whether LA-induced suppression of aromatase P450 is maintained in vitro, the level of aromatase P450 mRNA was quantified in cultured smooth muscle cells obtained from leiomyoma nodules (leiomyoma cells). Leiomyoma cells obtained from the LA group and those from the no LA group were incubated in the presence or absence of dexamethasone (DEX) + IL-1ß for 24 h, and then aromatase activity was measured. As shown in Fig. 1BGo, there was no difference in either the basal level of aromatase P450 expression or in the DEX + IL-1ß-induced level of aromatase P450 expression between the LA group and the no LA group. Thus, preoperative LA therapy suppressed the level of expression in tissue in vivo but had no similar prolonged effect once the cells were cultured ex vivo. Interestingly, the basal level of expression, as low as that observed in myometrial and leiomyomatous tissue of the LA group (shown in Fig. 1AGo, right), increased close to the tissue level of expression in one day of culture (Fig. 1AGo, left). This finding is compatible with the notion that leiomyoma cells maintain their ability to express aromatase P450 in response to suitable stimulants that exist in the tissues and decrease the basal level of expression when cultured ex vivo because of the removal of stimulants.

Regulation of aromatase activity in leiomyoma cells in culture.The expression of aromatase P 450 is regulated both in the myometrium and leiomyomas by various stimulants, such as phorbol myristyl acetate (PMA), IL-1ß, DEX, and PGE2 (26). To examine whether preoperative LA therapy alter the regulation of aromatase P450 in leiomyoma cells in culture, aromatase activity was determined in the presence of these stimulants. As shown in Fig. 3Go, the basal level of aromatase activity did not differ between the LA group and the no LA group. Among the stimulants tested, the combination of DEX + IL-1ß increased aromatase activity most effectively, followed by PMA alone and PGE2 + IL-1ß. Neither increases in the response to each stimulant or the basal level of expression differed between the LA group and the no LA group. Thus, aromatase activity of leiomyoma cells in vitro was not altered by preoperative LA therapy.

Deprivation of ovarian estrogen does not cause suppression of aromatase P450 in leiomyoma cells during LA therapy

Aromatase P450 might be up regulated by its product, E2 (30, 31). In other words, the lower the level of circulating (ovarian) estrogen, the lesser the amount of aromatase P450 transcripts in extragonadal cells is. If this is true, we could assume that GnRH agonist-induced suppression of circulating (ovarian) estrogen is a causal factor of decreased aromatase P450 expression in leiomyoma cells during GnRH agonist therapy. To test this possibility, we examined the effects of estrogen on the expression of aromatase P450 in leiomyoma cells. Leiomyoma cells obtained from the no LA group were treated with various concentrations of E2 for 24 h, and aromatase activity then was measured. As shown in Fig. 4Go, treatment with 100 pmol/liter to 10 nmol/liter E2 did not affect aromatase activity. This result does not support the notion that a decrease in circulating (ovarian) estrogen causes suppression of aromatase P450 expression in leiomyomas.

In vitro suppression of aromatase P450 expression in leiomyoma cells by prolonged treatment with LA

To investigate the direct actions of LA on leiomyoma cells, we treated leiomyoma cells with LA (100 nmol/liter) for 1–8 d. Twenty-four hours before the end of incubation, leiomyoma cells were treated with DEX (25 nmol/liter) + IL-1ß (1 ng/ml), and then aromatase activity was measured. The basal (nonstimulated) level of aromatase activity gradually increased by approximately 100% over 8 d of incubation (Fig. 5AGo). Conversely, the DEX + IL-1ß-induced level of aromatase activity was suppressed by preincubation with LA and the decrease reached a significant level at the eighth day of incubation in comparison to nonpreincubated control. This decrease in the DEX + IL-1ß-induced level was statistically significant even when compared with the control that were similarly preincubated for the same period (8 d) in the absence of LA. There was no significant change in cellular protein levels during the incubation period (Fig. 5BGo), suggesting that the decrease in response to the stimulants was not the result of nonspecific cell damage during culture. The decrease in aromatase activity was attributable to a reduction in the mRNA level (Fig. 5CGo).

Discussion

In our previous report, we demonstrated that leiomyoma cells express a high level of aromatase P450 and are able to synthesize estrogen to promote their own cell growth (26). In that experiment, we estimated the conversion of androgen into E in leiomyoma cells in culture and found that a physiological level of androstenedione (10 nmol/liter) promoted cell growth with a slight increase in E2 concentration in the media (10 pmol/liter), which is one order lower than that the minimum concentration of E2 necessary to induce cell growth (100 pmol/liter). Thus, in situ estrogen synthesized in leiomyoma cells appears to act in a paracrine/autocrine/intracrine manner rather than in "an endocrine manner." In premenopausal women, the amount of circulating E2 (100 pmol/liter or higher) secreted from the ovary is considerable in comparison with estrogen synthesized in situ. Thus, in situ estrogen is not likely important for the cell growth of leiomyoma cells. On the other hand, after cessation of follicular growth, in situ estrogen possibly becomes the sole source of estrogen available for leiomyoma cells in postmenopausal women. As the plasma level of androstenedione (5–10 nmol/liter) in women at early menopause is maintained at the level of or at a slightly higher level of the apparent Km of aromatase P450 to androstenedione (3 nmol/liter), a physiologically significant amount of estrogen might be synthesized in situ (26). Presumably, in situ estrogen plays a role in preventing leiomyoma cells from rapid regression, which would be viewed as the result of the complete depletion of ovarian estrogen. Actually, more than 85% of leiomyomas do not show detectable regression in the first 6 months of natural menopause in comparison with the rapid decrease in plasma E2 levels (27). In contrast to this slow regression seen in natural menopause, most leiomyomas shrink rapidly during LA therapy, loosing 30% or more volume in the first 12 wk of LA treatment (23, 24). The regression rate of leiomyoma nodules is estimated to be three times faster in women treated with GnRH agonist than that in women of the early stage of menopause (27). The present study demonstrated that therapeutic levels of LA reduced the expression of aromatase P450 in leiomyoma cells less than one twentieth, indicating that there is virtually no in situ estrogen available to prevent rapid regression during LA therapy. LA reduces the amount of both ovarian estrogen and in situ estrogen available, causing leiomyomas to show rapid and profound shrinkage. There is further evidence to support the importance of this role of in situ estrogen in leiomyoma shrinkage. Some women who show significant regression of leiomyoma during LA therapy still maintain a higher level of plasma estradiol (50–100 pmol/liter) than women at menopause do (32). Even women who continue to have significant circulating estrogen levels (150 pmol/liter or higher) and experience repetitive genital bleeding during treatment with another GnRH agonist, buserelin, show significant shrinkage of leiomyomas (33). Therefore, complete down-regulation of the ovary and hypoestrogenemia is not necessary for successful shrinkage of leiomyomas during GnRH agonist therapy. Moreover, low-dose estrogen add-back did not induce regrowth of leiomyomas during GnRH agonist therapy (34). Given these findings, the role of in situ E would be important in borderline-hypoestrogenemic conditions, and, therefore, inhibition of in situ aromatase may be beneficial for successful shrinkage during LA administration. Further study is needed to confirm this hypothesis.

In the present study, we used enzymatically isolated leiomyoma cells as a model to study the action of LA. More than 95% of cells that we used were positive for smooth muscle specific {alpha}-actin (26). However, it has been noted that myometrial cells in primary culture undergo a transformation from contractile to synthetic phenotype, losing some morphological characteristics for smooth muscle cells (35). We used only the first and the second passage cells to minimize transition from the contractile phenotype. So far, we have confirmed that the leiomyoma cells used expressed a higher level of ER mRNA and proliferated in response to E2, whereas myometrial smooth muscle cells cultivated from the normal myometrium did not show any response to E2 (26). Thus, the leiomyoma cells we used possess some features characteristic to leiomyoma cells in terms of the functional ER. We also confirmed that LA activated MAPK in these leiomyoma cells, indicating the presence of functional receptors for a GnRH agonist (data not shown). Moreover, these leiomyoma cells maintained the potential to express aromatase P450 in response to suitable stimulants. Given these features, we used the enzymatically isolated cells to study the regulation of aromatase in vitro.

The present study clearly demonstrated that preoperative LA administration reduced the expression of aromatase P450 in leiomyoma tissues. Once leiomyoma cells were isolated and cultured ex vivo in the absence of LA, there was no difference in the expression of aromatase P450 between cells obtained from the LA group and the no LA group. Conversely, isolated leiomyoma cells decreased such expression when they were cultured in the presence of LA in culture media. Although we cannot exclude the possibility that leiomyoma cells change their in vivo nature during culture, thus making our in vitro model unsuitable in the event, the most likely explanation of our findings at this time is that LA directly acts on leiomyoma cells to reduce the expression of aromatase P450, and this process is reversible. Our in vivo model may be useful to study LA action. The magnitude of suppression in the expression level was, however, smaller in the in vitro model (approximately 30% reduction) than in vivo tissues samples (more than 90% reduction). Duration of treatment with LA may explain the difference. Further study is needed to define the precise mechanism of LA action on the expression of aromatase P450.

There are at least seven different promoters for a single copy gene of aromatase P450 (CYP19) and these promoters were alternatively used in a tissue- and stimulant-specific manner. For example, the promoters PII, I.4, 1f, and I.1 of aromatase P450 were mainly used for the ovary and prostate, adipose tissues and skin fibroblasts, brain, and placenta, respectively. Each promoter possesses different regulatory cis-elements upstream and is regulated differently through these regulatory cis-elements. Thus, it is necessary to identify the promoter use of aromatase P450 in leiomyoma cells to define the possible action of LA on the transcriptional regulation of aromatase P450. Bulun et al. (25) have reported that leiomyoma tissue primarily uses promoter PII and partly promoter I.4. Judging from the many cell types that have been analyzed, to date, cAMP and PGE2 are the most potent stimulators for PII-induced transcription and the combination of DEX + IL-1ß or DEX + another cytokines for promoter I.4-induced transcription. We tested these combinations in the present study and found that DEX + IL-1ß was the most potent and that PGE2 alone was ineffective. This indicates that the promoter I.4 is the most active promoter in these leiomyoma cells. Precise promoter use in leiomyomas is currently under investigation.

Besides the deprivation of estrogen, several different mechanisms have been proposed for LA-induced regression of leiomyomas. Leiomyoma tissue and its receptors express a higher level of TGFß1 than unaffected myometrium, and women who received LA therapy had a substantially lower level of expression than untreated controls (36). Given that TGFß1 is an autocrine growth factor of leiomyomas, suppression of TGFß1 may contribute to LA-induced growth retardation of leiomyomas (37). As secretion of active form of TGFß1 from leiomyoma cells is up-regulated by estrogen, LA-induced suppression of TGFß1 may result from estrogen suppression (36, 37). Kobayashi et al. (14) proposed another mechanism, in which excessive treatment of leiomyoma cells with buserelin reduces the expression of cyclin estrogen and p33cdk2, the G1-related genes necessary for G1 to S progression and, thus, inhibits cell proliferation. In some cancer cell lines such as EFO-21 (ovarian cancer), EFO-27 (ovarian cancer), and HEC-1A (endometrial cancer), GnRH agonists activate phosphotyrosine phosphatase, which then abolishes intracellular signaling of growth factors through phosphorylation (38). In the Caov-3 cell line, another ovarian cancer cell line, prolonged activation of MAPK induced by GnRH agonist treatment causes hypophosphorylation of pRB and then suppresses G1-S transition, although the precise mechanism of hypophosphorylation of pRB is unknown (13). These possibilities remain to be tested in leiomyoma cells.

In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that LA abolished overexpression of aromatase P450 in situ probably through direct action on leiomyoma cells. As discussed above, GnRH agonist (LA) therapy would render suppression of in situ aromatase a key determinant in achieving a maximum shrinkage of leiomyomas. The importance of in situ estrogen on leiomyoma growth may justify estrogen add-back therapy, in which small amounts of estrogen are administered during GnRH agonist therapy in an attempt to prevent adverse effects of long-term deprivation of estrogen, such as hot flashes and loss of bone mass, without nullifying their therapeutic effects (34, 39, 40). Further study is required to substantiate the clinical significance of in situ estrogen on leiomyoma cell growth to validate such add-back therapy. The mechanism by which LA represses the transcription of aromatase P450 also remains to be elucidated.

Footnotes

This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research B12557136, B13470348, and C11676102 from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture, Japan.

Abbreviations: DEX, Dexamethasone; G3PDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; LA, leuprorelin acetate; PMA, phorbol myristyl acetate.

Received October 25, 2000.

Accepted April 26, 2001.

References

  1. Ortmann O, Diedrich K 1999 Pituitary and extrapituitary actions of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone and its analogues. Hum Reprod 14(Suppl 1): 194–206
  2. Palyi I, Vincze B, Lovas S, Mezo I, Pato J, Kalnay A, Turi G, Gaal D, Mihalik R, Peter I, Teplan I, Murphy R 1999 Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue conjugates with strong selective antitumor activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:2361–2366[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Baumann KH, Kiesel L, Kaufmann M, Bastert G, Runnebaum B 1993 Characterization of binding sites for a GnRH-agonist (buserelin) in human breast cancer biopsies and their distribution in relation to tumor parameters. Breast Cancer Res Treat 25:37–46[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Ohno T, Imai A, Furui T, Takahashi K, Tamaya T 1993 Presence of gonadotropin-releasing hormone and its messenger ribonucleic acid in human ovarian epithelial carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 169:605–610[Medline]
  5. Imai A, Iida K, Tamaya T 1993 Gonadotropin-releasing hormone has a biphasic action on aromatase activity through protein kinase C in granulosa cells. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud 38:50–56[Medline]
  6. Halmos G, Arencibia JM, Schally AV, Davis R, Bostwick DG 2000 High incidence of receptors for luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) and LHRH receptor gene expression in human prostate cancers. J Urol 163:623–629[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Imai A, Ohno T, Ohsuye K, Tamaya T 1994 Expression of gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor in human epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Ann Clin Biochem 31:550–555
  8. Lin LS, Roberts VJ, Yen SS 1995 Expression of human gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor gene in the placenta and its functional relationship to human chorionic gonadotropin secretion. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:580–585[Abstract]
  9. Kang SK, Choi KC, Cheng KW, Nathwani PS, Auersperg N, Leung PC 2000 Role of gonadotropin-releasing hormone as an autocrine growth factor in human ovarian surface epithelium. Endocrinology 141:72–80[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Emons G, Schulz KD 2000 Primary and salvage therapy with LH-RH analogues in ovarian cancer. Recent Results Cancer Res 153:83–94[Medline]
  11. Mesia AF, Demopoulos RI 2000 Effects of leuprolide acetate on low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:1140–1141[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Emons G, Schally AV 1994 The use of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonists and antagonists in gynaecological cancers. Hum Reprod 9:1364–1379[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Kimura A, Ohmichi M, Kurachi H, Ikegami H, Hayakawa J, Tasaka K, Kanda Y, Nishio Y, Jikihara H, Matsuura N, Murata Y 1999 Role of mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase cascade in gonadotropin-releasing hormone-induced growth inhibition of a human ovarian cancer cell line. Cancer Res 59:5133–5142[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Kobayashi Y, Zhai YL, Iinuma M, Horiuchi A, Nikaido T, Fujii S 1997 Effects of a GnRH analogue on human smooth muscle cells cultured from normal myometrial and from uterine leiomyomal tissues. Mol Hum Reprod 3:91–99[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Parmar H, Nicoll J, Stockdale A, Cassoni A, Phillips RH, Lightman SL, Schally AV 1985 Advanced ovarian carcinoma: response to the agonist D-Trp-6-LHRH [Letter]. Cancer Treat Rep 69:1341–1342[Medline]
  16. Parmar H, Rustin G, Lightman SL, Phillips RH, Hanham IW, Schally AV 1988 Response to D-Trp-6-luteinising hormone releasing hormone (Decapeptyl) microcapsules in advanced ovarian cancer. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 296:1229
  17. Parmar H, Phillips RH, Rustin G, Lightman SL, Schally AV 1988 Therapy of advanced ovarian cancer with D-Trp-6-LH-RH (decapeptyl) microcapsules. Biomed Pharmacother 42:531–538[Medline]
  18. Jager W, Wildt L, Lang N 1989 Some observations on the effect of a GnRH analog in ovarian cancer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 32:137–148[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Kavanagh JJ, Roberts W, Townsend P, Hewitt S 1989 Leuprolide acetate in the treatment of refractory or persistent epithelial ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 7:115–118[Abstract]
  20. Bruckner HW, Motwani BT 1989 Treatment of advanced refractory ovarian carcinoma with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue. Am J Obstet Gynecol 161:1216–1218[Medline]
  21. Kauppila A, Bangah M, Burger H, Martikainen H 1992 GnRH agonist analog therapy in advanced/recurrent granulosa cell tumors: further evidence of a role of inhibin in monitoring response to treatment. Gynecol Endocrinol 6: 271–274
  22. Hofstra LS, Mourits MJ, de Vries EG, Mulder NH, Willemse PH 1999 Combined treatment with goserelin and tamoxifen in patients with advanced chemotherapy resistant ovarian cancer. Anticancer Res 19:3627–3630[Medline]
  23. Adamson GD 1992 Treatment of uterine fibroids: current findings with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166:746–751[Medline]
  24. Demopoulos RI, Mesia AF 1998 Effects of leuprolide acetate on treatment of leiomyomata–clues to mechanisms of action. Adv Anat Pathol 5:129–136[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Bulun SE, Simpson ER, Word RA 1994 Expression of the CYP19 gene and its product aromatase cytochrome P450 in human uterine leiomyoma tissues and cells in culture. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 78:736–743[Abstract]
  26. Sumitani H, Shozu M, Segawa T, Murakami K, Yang H-J, Shimada K, Inoue M 2000 In situ estrogen synthesized by aromatase P450 in uterine leiomyoma cells promotes cell growth probably via an autocrine/intracrine mechanism. Endocrinology 141:3852–3861[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Kurose T, Hando T, Shiota A 1995 Clinical usefulness of GnRH agonist therapy for premenopausal women with uterine leiomyoma. Nippon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi 47:35–41[Medline]
  28. Shozu M, Zhao Y, Simpson ER 1997 Estrogen biosynthesis in THP1 cells is regulated by promoter switching of the aromatase (CYP19) gene. Endocrinology 138:5125–5135[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Shozu M, Simpson ER 1998 Aromatase expression of human osteoblast-like cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 139:117–129[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Tseng L, Mazella J, Chen GA 1987 Effect of relaxin on aromatase activity in human endometrial stromal cells. Endocrinology 120:2220–2226[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Jakob F, Homann D, Seufert J, Schneider D, Kohrle J 1995 Expression and regulation of aromatase cytochrome P450 in THP 1 human myeloid leukaemia cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 110:27–33[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Friedman AJ, Lobel SM, Rein MS, Barbieri RL 1990 Efficacy and safety considerations in women with uterine leiomyomas treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists: the estrogen threshold hypothesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 163:1114–1119[Medline]
  33. Takeuchi H, Kobori H, Kikuchi I, Sato Y, Mitsuhashi N 2000 A prospective randomized study comparing endocrinological and clinical effects of two types of GnRH agonists in cases of uterine leiomyomas or endometriosis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 26:325–331[Medline]
  34. Friedman AJ, Daly M, Juneau-Norcross M, Gleason R, Rein MS, LeBoff M 1994 Long-term medical therapy for leiomyomata uteri: a prospective, randomized study of leuprolide acetate depot plus either oestrogen-progestin or progestin "add-back" for 2 years. Hum Reprod 9:1618–1625[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Palmberg L, Thyberg J 1986 Uterine smooth muscle cells in primary culture. Alterations in fine structure, cytoskeletal organization and growth characteristics. Cell Tissue Res 246:253–262[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Dou Q, Zhao Y, Tarnuzzer RW, Rong H, Williams RS, Schultz GS, Chegini N 1996 Suppression of transforming growth factor-ß (TGF ß) and TGF ß receptor messenger ribonucleic acid and protein expression in leiomyomata in women receiving gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:3222–3230[Abstract]
  37. Chegini N, Rong H, Dou Q, Kipersztok S, Williams RS 1996 Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and GnRH receptor gene expression in human myometrium and leiomyomata and the direct action of GnRH analogs on myometrial smooth muscle cells and interaction with ovarian steroids in vitro. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:3215–3221[Abstract]
  38. Emons G, Muller V, Ortmann O, Schulz KD 1998 Effects of LHRH-analogues on mitogenic signal transduction in cancer cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 65:199–206[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Thomas EJ 1996 Add-back therapy for long-term use in dysfunctional uterine bleeding and uterine fibroids. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 103(Suppl 14):18–21
  40. Nakayama H, Yano T, Sagara Y, Kikuchi A, Ando K, Wang Y, Watanabe M, Matsumi H, Osuga Y, Momoeda M, Taketani Y 1999 Estriol add-back therapy in the long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment of uterine leiomyomata. Gynecol Endocrinol 13:382–389[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
S. E. Bulun, Z. Lin, G. Imir, S. Amin, M. Demura, B. Yilmaz, R. Martin, H. Utsunomiya, S. Thung, B. Gurates, et al.
Regulation of Aromatase Expression in Estrogen-Responsive Breast and Uterine Disease: From Bench to Treatment
Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2005; 57(3): 359 - 383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
T. Kasai, M. Shozu, K. Murakami, T. Segawa, K. Shinohara, K. Nomura, and M. Inoue
Increased Expression of Type I 17{beta}-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Enhances in Situ Production of Estradiol in Uterine Leiomyoma
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2004; 89(11): 5661 - 5668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. Shozu, K. Murakami, T. Segawa, T. Kasai, H. Ishikawa, K. Shinohara, M. Okada, and M. Inoue
Decreased Expression of Early Growth Response-1 and Its Role in Uterine Leiomyoma Growth
Cancer Res., July 1, 2004; 64(13): 4677 - 4684.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
T. Maruo, N. Ohara, J. Wang, and H. Matsuo
Sex steroidal regulation of uterine leiomyoma growth and apoptosis
Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2004; 10(3): 207 - 220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
H.-J. Yang, M. Shozu, K. Murakami, H. Sumitani, T. Segawa, T. Kasai, and M. Inoue
Spatially Heterogenous Expression of Aromatase P450 through Promoter II Is Closely Correlated with the Level of Steroidogenic Factor-1 Transcript in Endometrioma Tissues
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2002; 87(8): 3745 - 3753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Shozu, H. Sumitani, T. Segawa, H.-J. Yang, K. Murakami, T. Kasai, and M. Inoue
Overexpression of Aromatase P450 in Leiomyoma Tissue Is Driven Primarily through Promoter I.4 of the Aromatase P450 Gene (CYP19)
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2002; 87(6): 2540 - 2548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shozu, M.
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shozu, M.
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals