help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Azziz, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ghazzi, M. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Azziz, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ghazzi, M. N.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 86, No. 10 5090-5091
Copyright © 2001 by The Endocrine Society


Letters to the Editor

Authors’ Response: Troglitazone Use in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Ricardo Azziz, David Ehrmann, Richard S. Legro, Randy Whitcomb, Rochelle Hanley, Anita Gmerek Fereshtian, Mary O’Keefe, Mahmoud N. Ghazzi and for the PCOS/Troglitazone Study Group

Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Medicine (R.A.), The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Department of Medicine (D.E.), The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (R.S.L.), The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania; St. Joseph Mercy Hospital (R.W.), Ann Arbor, Michigan; and Pfizer Global Research and Development (R.H., A.G.F., M.O., M.N.G.), Ann Arbor, Michigan

To the editor:

We appreciate the interest of Drs. Landman and Jacobs in our study and their queries. Firstly, the correspondents would like to know how many patients were terminated due the withdrawal of troglitazone from the market in March 2000 vs. those withdrawn for adverse outcomes. On page 1628, top paragraph, right column of the published article we note that "The principal reasons for patients not completing the study were early termination of the study by the Sponsor (range: 11.5% to 19.8%) and lack of compliance (range: 5.0% to 13.6%). The percentage of patients withdrawing from the study due to adverse events ranged from 4% to 7%, not different between treatment arms." Table 1Go provides greater detail.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Disposition of all patients entered into a multicenter, double blind, placebo-controlled trial study of troglitazone treatment in polycystic ovary syndrome

 
The correspondents state that it is unclear "at what point between wk 20 and 40" subjects were withdrawn from the study. We infer from this question that the correspondents are concerned that withdrawal prior to completion could have impacted on efficacy data. It must be noted that assessment of efficacy for hormonal and metabolic end points, as well as hirsutism score, was based on the baseline and latest follow-up value available (i.e., at 20 or 44 wk). In approximately 60% of patients, these parameters were calculated from values obtained at 0 wk and 20 wk, and in the remaining 40%, between 0 and 44 wk. The only parameter determined on a continuous basis, and for which evaluability could have terminated at any point between 12 wk and 44 wk of the study, was ovulatory function (assessed from the daily urine collections). Unfortunately, we cannot readily determine the dropout rate of patients on a per week basis to answer the correspondents’ query.

Drs. Landman and Jacobs also question whether an unwanted pregnancy should be considered an adverse outcome in this study. In fact, pregnancies were considered as adverse events, although they were reported separately in the Results section of our manuscript. We should note that the study inclusion and exclusion criteria stipulated that subjects must either have had a tubal ligation or use barrier contraceptive. In general, all studies performed in reproductive-aged women should be considered to carry the potential risk of unplanned (at least for the investigator) pregnancy. If the teratogenic risk of a drug is significant then investigators should include only patients with permanent forms of contraception (e.g., tubal ligation). However, since the FDA had classified troglitazone as pregnancy class B, we did not feel that this was a necessary exclusion.

Finally, the correspondents would like to know what the outcome of the pregnancies occurring in the study was. As noted in the report, 12 of the 17 pregnancies resulted in live births. Of these 10 were reported normal. One child whose mother received placebo was reported to have cerebral palsy, and another child whose mother received troglitazone 300 mg/d had normal cognitive function but mild growth retardation and was being followed for possible cerebral palsy. In all cases, the investigators did not feel that the pregnancies outcomes were related to the use of drug.

We appreciate the interest in this study and look forward to other investigations in this important and clinically challenging field.

Received June 21, 2001.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
G.L. Jones, J.M. Hall, A.H. Balen, and W.L. Ledger
Health-related quality of life measurement in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2008; 14(1): 15 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. S. Legro, R. Azziz, D. Ehrmann, A. G. Fereshetian, M. O'Keefe, and M. N. Ghazzi
Minimal Response of Circulating Lipids in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome to Improvement in Insulin Sensitivity with Troglitazone
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2003; 88(11): 5137 - 5144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
V. De Leo, A. la Marca, and F. Petraglia
Insulin-Lowering Agents in the Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2003; 24(5): 633 - 667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Azziz, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ghazzi, M. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Azziz, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ghazzi, M. N.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals