This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Submit a related Letter to the Editor Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints, Permissions and Rights Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Trappe, T. A. Articles by Evans, W. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Trappe, T. A. Articles by Evans, W. J.

Skeletal Muscle PGF₂and PGE₂ in Response to Eccentric Resistance Exercise: Influence of Ibuprofen and Acetaminophen

Nutrition, Metabolism, and Exercise Laboratory, Donald W. Reynolds Center on Aging, Department of Geriatrics, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, and Central Arkansas Veterans HealthCare System, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Todd Trappe, Ph.D., Nutrition, Metabolism, and Exercise Laboratory, Donald W. Reynolds Center on Aging, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 West Markham, Slot 806, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205. E-mail: trappetodda{at}uams.edu

Abstract

PGs have been shown to modulate skeletal muscle protein metabolism as well as inflammation and pain. In nonskeletal muscle tissues, the over the counter analgesic drugs ibuprofen and acetaminophen function through suppression of PG synthesis. We previously reported that ibuprofen and acetaminophen inhibit the normal increase in skeletal muscle protein synthesis after high intensity eccentric resistance exercise. The current study examined skeletal muscle PG levels in the same subjects to further investigate the mechanisms of action of these drugs in exercised skeletal muscle. Twenty-four males (25 ± 3 yr) were assigned to 3 groups that received the maximal over the counter dose of ibuprofen (1200 mg/d), acetaminophen (4000 mg/d), or a placebo after 10–14 sets of 10 eccentric repetitions at 120% of concentric 1 repetition maximum using the knee extensors. Preexercise and 24 h postexercise biopsies of the vastus lateralis revealed that the exercise-induced change in PGF₂ in the placebo group (77%) was significantly different (P < 0.05) from those in the ibuprofen (-1%) and acetaminophen (-14%) groups. However, the exercise-induced change in PGE₂ in the placebo group (64%) was only significantly different (P < 0.05) from that in the acetaminophen group (-16%). The exercise-induced changes in PGF₂ and PGE₂ were not different between the ibuprofen and acetaminophen groups. These results suggest that ibuprofen and acetaminophen have a comparable effect on suppressing the normal increase in PGF₂ in human skeletal muscle after eccentric resistance exercise, which may profoundly influence the anabolic response of muscle to this form of exercise.

Skeletal Muscle PGF₂ and PGE₂ in Response to Eccentric Resistance Exercise: Influence of Ibuprofen and Acetaminophen

CONSUMPTION OF IBUPROFEN (IBU) and acetaminophen (ACET), two common over the counter analgesics, after unaccustomed muscular exercise that causes muscle soreness is very prevalent. However, there are few data concerning the mechanisms of action of either of these drugs in humans with regard to muscle metabolism. It is believed that both of these drugs act through inhibition of PG synthesis in either the skeletal muscle or the central nervous system.

PGs are synthesized in skeletal muscle and have been shown to have profound effects on skeletal muscle protein turnover (1, 2, 3). Specifically, PGF₂ and PGE₂ increase skeletal muscle protein synthesis and degradation, respectively (1, 2, 3). PGs are also considered to be modulators of inflammation and pain (4, 5). PGE₂ has been shown to be algesic itself (5, 6) as well as to stimulate the algesic properties of several nociceptive stimuli (6).

PG synthesis is regulated at two levels: 1) by controlling the activity of several lipases (i.e. A₂, C, and D) (7, 8) that release the PG precursor aracadonic acid (AA) from membrane phospholipids, and 2) controlling the activity of PG endoperoxide GH synthase (EC 1.14.99.1; now known as cyclooxygenase), the enzyme that converts AA to PGs (9, 10, 11, 12). Cyclooxygenase is regulated by several commonly consumed analgesic drugs [e.g. ibuprofen, acetaminophen, and acetacylic acid (aspirin)] (11, 13) as well as by mechanical stimulation and stretch (14, 15). Therefore, it is likely that consumption of cyclooxygenase-inhibiting drugs would alter PG levels in tissues such as skeletal muscle. It is thought that cyclooxygenase-inhibiting drugs have varying efficacy that is tissue specific (10, 11, 16, 17, 18, 19). For example, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, such as ibuprofen, have a major effect on cyclooxygenase in the peripheral tissues (10, 11, 16, 17, 18, 19), and similar drugs, such as indomethacin and meclofenamic acid, have been shown to have significant effects in skeletal muscle in rats and rabbits (2, 20). However, it is believed that the major site of cyclooxygenase inhibition by acetaminophen is in the central nervous system, and that this drug has little peripheral effect (10, 11, 16, 17, 18, 19).

Recently, we reported the normal increase in skeletal muscle protein synthesis 24 h after high intensity eccentric resistance exercise was significantly attenuated in individuals that consumed over the counter doses of ibuprofen and acetaminophen (21). We also found that neither drug had any effect on the rating of perceived muscle soreness in the days following the exercise (21). Considering these findings and the aforementioned mechanisms of action of ibuprofen and acetaminophen in nonskeletal muscle tissue, we measured PGF₂ and PGE₂ levels in these same subjects to further investigate the mechanisms of action of these drugs in exercised skeletal muscle. Before the study we hypothesized that a group that consumed no drug (placebo) or acetaminophen would elicit larger increases in skeletal muscle PGF₂ and PGE₂ than the ibuprofen group, which would respond with a relatively blunted skeletal muscle PG response.

Experimental Subjects

Twenty-four recreationally active males were recruited and randomly assigned to three groups of eight subjects: placebo (PLA), IBU, or ACET (Table 1). All subjects were accepted into the study after giving informed consent and following a screening for any metabolic abnormalities via blood and urine analyses, and medical history questionnaire. The investigation was approved by the institutional review board of the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences.

Eccentric exercise protocol

Each subject underwent a bout of unilateral high intensity eccentric exercise with each leg 2 d after and approximately 24 h before a muscle biopsy for the measurement of PGF₂ and PGE₂. The maximal load that each subject could lift concentrically with their knee extensors was first determined, and the eccentric workload was set at 120% of the concentric maximum. The eccentric exercise consisted of 10–14 sets of 10 repetitions with 60-sec rest between sets of knee extensor exercise on a muscle dynamometer in the isotonic mode (Cybex Norm, Lumenex, Ronkonkoma, NY). The range of 10–14 sets was achieved as a result of the variation in fatigue of the muscles of each subject. When the weight was lowered in less than 0.5 sec, the subject completed that set and was deemed fatigued, and the protocol was stopped.

Drug dose and administration

Drugs were administered in double blind, placebo-controlled fashion. On the day of the eccentric exercise protocol each drug was administered in three doses (0800, 1400, and 2000 h) corresponding to the maximal over the counter daily dose (IBU, 400 mg/dose, total of 1200 mg; ACET, 1500, 1500, and 1000 mg, total of 4000 mg). The first dose was given at the start of the eccentric exercise protocol. A fourth dose was given the following morning approximately 5 h before the second muscle biopsy (see below), which corresponded to the 0800 h dose the day before. The PLA group was given the same number of pills, and they were indistinguishable from the drug doses. The times of the doses were chosen to divide the maximal over the counter dose evenly over the day and as a result of the pharmacokinetic studies that had previously been completed on these drugs (22, 23, 24).

Muscle biopsy and PG measurement

Muscle biopsies (25) were taken from the vastus lateralis 2 d before (dominant leg) and approximately 24 h after (nondominant leg) the eccentric exercise protocol. The muscle was cleansed of excess blood, connective tissue, and fat and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. The tissue was stored in liquid nitrogen (-190 C) until analysis. For the measurement of PGF₂ and PGE₂, a piece of muscle weighing approximately 60 mg wet weight was homogenized on ice for 30 sec in 10 vol ice-cold buffer containing 25 mM HEPES, 4 mM EDTA, 25 mM benzamidine, 1 µM leupeptin and pepstatin, 0.15 mM aprotinin, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride, and 10 µg/ml meclofenamic acid to prevent any further production of PGs from AA. The homogenate was acidified to pH 3.5 with 2.0 M HCl and centrifuged at 3000 x g at 4 C for 15 min. The supernatant was then applied to a column containing 200 mg octadecylsulfate (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) at 4 C. The column was washed with 10 ml distilled H₂O, followed by 10 ml ethanol and 10 ml hexane, and the eluates were discarded. The PGs were eluted from the column with 10 ml ethyl acetate and stored at -80 C. The ethyl acetate fraction was dried under N₂ gas and reconstituted with 50 µl ethanol and 950 µl Tris-buffered saline (assay buffer, catalogue no. 80010, Assay Designs, Ann Arbor, MI). Concentrations of PGF₂ and PGE₂ were determined by enzyme immunoassay (Assay Designs, Ann Arbor, MI). The efficiency of the PG extraction procedure was determined to be more than 97% after extraction, radioactive analysis, and PG concentration determination by enzyme immunoassay of [5,6,8,11,12,14,15-N-³H]PGE₂ (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Little Chalfont, UK).

Statistics

Subject characteristics (height, weight, age, and percent body fat) and percent change in PG concentration from pre- to postexercise among the groups were compared using one-way ANOVA. PG concentrations before and after exercise among the groups were compared by two-way ANOVA with repeated measures over time. When a significant interaction was obtained, a Newman-Keuls post-hoc analysis was used to determine the location of the differences. Significance was accepted at a level of P < 0.05. Data are presented as the mean ± SE.

Results

There were no differences in any of the subject characteristics among the three groups (Table 1). PGF₂ (picograms per mg wet wt) was increased (P < 0.05) in the PLA group (1.12 ± 0.15 to 1.76 ± 0.17), but was unchanged (P > 0.05) in the IBU (1.20 ± 0.12 to 1.07 ± 0.12) and ACET (1.76 ± 0.29 to 1.33 ± 0.17) groups. PGE₂ (picograms per mg wet wt) was unchanged (P > 0.05) in the PLA (4.29 ± 0.22 to 6.87 ± 0.50), IBU (4.81 ± 0.46 to 5.43 ± 0.97), and ACET (6.70 ± 0.86 to 5.08 ± 0.57) groups. Figure 1 shows the change in PGF₂ and PGE₂ from pre- to postexercise. The change in PGF₂ in the PLA group was significantly (P < 0.05) different from that in the IBU and ACET groups; however, the change from pre- to postexercise was not different (P > 0.05) between the ACET and IBU groups. The change in PGE₂ from pre- to postexercise was significantly different (P < 0.05) between the PLA and ACET groups; however, the change from pre- to postexercise was not different between PLA and IBU or between IBU and ACET groups.

View larger version (16K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Relative changes in PGF2 and PGE2 from pre- to postexercise. *, Significantly different (P < 0.05) from PLA. The change from pre- to postexercise was not different between ACET and IBU for PGF2 or PGE2.

The main findings of this study were 1) PGF₂ increases after eccentric resistance exercise; and 2) both IBU and ACET attenuate this increase. It was somewhat surprising that in addition to IBU, ACET had a profound attenuating effect on PGF₂ levels after the exercise bout compared with those in the placebo group. In fact, compared with placebo, ACET also blunted the PGE₂ response to exercise, whereas IBU did not have a significant effect. These findings were contrary to our hypothesis that ACET would have no effect in skeletal muscle, given that ACET is believed to have little effect in peripheral tissues (10, 11, 16, 17, 18, 19). However, these findings are consistent with our previous findings that both IBU and ACET block the increase in muscle protein synthesis after the same high intensity eccentric exercise bout (21). Therefore, these data seem to suggest that ACET is effective for blocking PG production in muscle, probably through a similar mechanism to that of IBU (9, 10, 12).

There are two likely explanations for our findings regarding the similarity of effect of these drugs on PG regulation in skeletal muscle. First, the dose of the drugs must be considered. The dose of the IBU and ACET used in the current study was based on FDA limitations on the maximal over the counter doses. These dose limitations are derived considering safety and efficacy and are probably unrelated to any previously examined effects on skeletal muscle. ACET is considered to be a pure analgesic and is not considered to elicit antiinflammatory activity (11, 19, 26). IBU is also considered to be a pure analgesic when taken at the dose used in the current study (i.e. 1200 mg/d) and reportedly only has antiinflammatory activity at doses above this level (11, 19, 26). It appears that maximal over the counter doses of these drugs inhibit cyclooxygenase activity in skeletal muscle in an equivalent manner.

The second possible explanation for the similar effects of the drugs used in the current study is the isoform(s) of cyclooxygenase that exists in skeletal muscle. The basis for the tissue specificity of ACET and IBU (10, 11, 16, 17, 18, 19) is related to the isoform of cyclooxygenase that is present in a given tissue. Currently, two isoforms of cyclooxygenase are known to exist in humans, cyclooxygenase 1 and 2, which are tissue specific (12, 27). To our knowledge, the isoform(s) of cyclooxygenase that is present in skeletal muscle has not been characterized. Thus, there may be an unidentified isoform of cyclooxygenase, as previously suggested (19, 28), in skeletal muscle. The reason for our initial hypothesis and our subsequent contrary findings may simply be due to the fact that no previous studies exist related to cyclooxygenase regulation and isoform distribution in human skeletal muscle. In the current study we did not directly measure cyclooxygenase activity or identify the specific isoforms of cyclooxygenase present in skeletal muscle, both of which would be helpful in interpreting our data.

In summary, these findings suggest that PGF₂ is increased in human skeletal muscle after eccentric resistance exercise. The common analgesics IBU and ACET, when consumed at maximal over the counter doses, blunt this response. This attenuated PG response may profoundly influence the anabolic response of muscle to this form of exercise. More information is needed about the isoform(s) of cyclooxygenase in human skeletal muscle and the metabolic consequences of PG blockade in skeletal muscle.

Acknowledgments

We thank the subjects for their participation and effort.

Footnotes

This work was supported by a grant from the McNeil Consumer Products Co. (to W.J.E.) and NIH Grant AG-00831 (to T.T.).

Abbreviations: AA, Aracadonic acid; ACET, acetaminophen; IBU, ibuprofen; PLA, placebo.

Received May 3, 2001.

Accepted May 31, 2001.

References

1. Palmer RM 1990 Prostaglandins and the control of muscle protein synthesis and degradation. Prostaglandins Leukotrienes Essent Fatty Acids 39:95–104[CrossRef][Medline]
2. Rodemann HP, Goldberg AL 1982 Arachidonic acid, prostaglandin E₂ and F₂ influence rates of protein turnover in skeletal and cardiac muscle. J Biol Chem 257:1632–1638[Free Full Text]
3. Vandenburgh HH, Shansky J, Solerssi R, Chromiak J 1995 Mechanical stimulation of skeletal muscle increases prostaglandin F₂ production, cyclooxygenase activity, and cell growth by a pertussis toxin sensitive mechanism. J Cell Physiol 163:285–294[CrossRef][Medline]
4. Ferreira SH 1972 Prostaglandins, aspirin-like drugs and analgesia. Nat New Biol 240:200–203[CrossRef][Medline]
5. Raja SN, Meyer RA, Campbell JN 1988 Peripheral mechanisms of somatic pain. Anesthesiology 68:571–590[Medline]
6. Evans AR, Vasko MR, Nicol GD 1999 The cAMP transduction cascade mediates the PGE2-induced inhibition of potassium currents in rat sensory neurons. J. Physiol 516):163–178
7. Irvine RF 1982 How is the level of free arachidonic acid controlled in mammalian cells? Biochem J 204:3–16[Medline]
8. Vandenburgh HH, Shansky J, Karlisch P, Solerssi RL 1993 Mechanical stimulation of skeletal muscle generates lipid-related second messengers by phospholipase activation. J Cell Physiol 155:63–71[CrossRef][Medline]
9. Vane JR 1971 Inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis as a mechanism of action for aspirin-like drugs. Nat New Biol 231:232–235[Medline]
10. Vane JR 1994 Towards a better aspirin. Nature 376:215–216[CrossRef]
11. Hersh EV, Moore PA, Ross GL 2000 Over-the-counter analgesics and antipyretics: a critical assessment. Clin Ther 22:500–548[CrossRef][Medline]
12. Vane SJ 2000 Aspirin and other anti-inflammatory drugs. Thorax 55(Suppl 2):S3–S9
13. Mitchell JA, Akarasereenont P, Thiemermann C, Flower RJ, Vane JR 1994 Selectivity of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs as inhibitors of constitutive and inducible cyclooxygenase. Pharmacology 90:11693–11697
14. Vandenburgh HH, Hatfaludy S, Karlisch P, Shansky J 1989 Skeletal muscle growth is stimulated by intermittent stretch-relaxation in tissue culture. Am J Physiol 256:C674–C682
15. Vandenburgh HH, Hatfaludy S, Sohar I, Shansky J 1990 Stretch-induced prostaglandins and protein turnover in cultured skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol 259:C232–C240
16. Bjorkman R 1995 Central antinociceptive effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and paracetamol. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 39(Suppl 103):1–44
17. Flower RJ, Vane JR 1972 Inhibition of prostaglandin synthetase in brain explains the anti-pyretic activity of paracetamol (4-acetamidophenol). Nature 240:410–411[CrossRef][Medline]
18. Tolman EL, Fuller BL, Marinan BA, Capetola RJ, Levinson SL, Rosenthale ME 1983 Tissue selectivity and variability of effects of acetaminophen on arachidonic acid metabolism. Prostaglandins Leukotrienes Med 12:347–356[CrossRef][Medline]
19. Botting RM 2000 Mechanism of action of acetaminophen: is there a cyclooxygenase 3? Clin Infect Dis 31(Suppl 5):S202–S210
20. Palmer RM, Reeds PJ, Atkinson T, Smith RH 1983 The influence of changes in tension on protein synthesis and prostaglandin release in isolated rabbit muscles. Biochem J 214:1011–1014[Medline]
21. Trappe TA, White F, Lambert CP, Hellerstein M, Evans WJ 2001 Influence of ibuprofen and acetaminophen on skeletal muscle protein synthesis following eccentric resistance exercise. FASEB J 15:A791
22. Burnham TH, Short RM, eds. 2001 Drugs, facts and comparisons. St. Louis: Facts and Comparisons
23. Albert KS, Sedman AJ, Wilkinson P, Stoll RG, Murray WJ, Wagner JG 1974 Bioavailability studies of acetaminophen and nitrofurantoin. J Clin Pharmacol 14:264–270[Abstract]
24. Lockwood GF, Albert KS, Gillespie WR, et al. 1983 Pharmacokinetics of ibuprofen in man. I. Free and total area/dose relationships. Clin Pharmacol Ther 34:97–103[Medline]
25. Bergstrom J 1962 Muscle electrolytes in man. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 14(Suppl 68):7–110
26. Bradley JD, Brandt KD, Katz BP, Kalasinski LA, Ryan SI 1991 Comparison of an antiinflammatory dose of ibuprofen, an analgesic dose of ibuprofen, and acetaminophen in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. N Engl J Med 325:87–91[Abstract]
27. Lichtenstein DR, Wolfe MM 2000 COX-2-selective NSAIDs: new and improved [Editorial]? JAMA 284:1297–1299[Free Full Text]
28. Simmons DL, Wagner D, Westover K 2000 Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, cyclooxygenase 2, and fever. Clin Infect Dis 31(Suppl 5):S211–S218

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. A. Burd, J. M. Dickinson, J. K. LeMoine, C. C. Carroll, B. E. Sullivan, J. M. Haus, B. Jemiolo, S. W. Trappe, G. M. Hughes, C. E. Sanders Jr., et al. Effect of a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor on postexercise muscle protein synthesis in humans Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, February 1, 2010; 298(2): E354 - E361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. Robinson, K. L. Hamilton, and B. F. Miller The interactions of some commonly consumed drugs with mitochondrial adaptations to exercise J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2009; 107(1): 8 - 16. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. L Novak, W. Billich, S. M. Smith, K. B. Sukhija, T. J. McLoughlin, T. A. Hornberger, and T. J. Koh COX-2 inhibitor reduces skeletal muscle hypertrophy in mice Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2009; 296(4): R1132 - R1139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. R. Mikkelsen, I. C. Helmark, M. Kjaer, and H. Langberg Prostaglandin synthesis can be inhibited locally by infusion of NSAIDS through microdialysis catheters in human skeletal muscle J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2008; 104(2): 534 - 537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. A. Trappe, C. C. Carroll, B. Jemiolo, S. W. Trappe, S. Dossing, M. Kjaer, and S. P. Magnusson Cyclooxygenase mRNA expression in human patellar tendon at rest and after exercise Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, January 1, 2008; 294(1): R192 - R199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Testa, B. Rocca, L. Spath, F. O. Ranelletti, G. Petrucci, G. Ciabattoni, F. Naro, S. Schiaffino, M. Volpe, and C. Reggiani Expression and activity of cyclooxygenase isoforms in skeletal muscles and myocardium of humans and rodents J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2007; 103(4): 1412 - 1418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. A. Bondesen, K. A. Jones, W. C. Glasgow, and G. K. Pavlath Inhibition of myoblast migration by prostacyclin is associated with enhanced cell fusion FASEB J, October 1, 2007; 21(12): 3338 - 3345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. Bamman Take two NSAIDs and call on your satellite cells in the morning J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2007; 103(2): 415 - 416. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. M. Weinheimer, B. Jemiolo, C. C. Carroll, M. P. Harber, J. M. Haus, N. A. Burd, J. K. LeMoine, S. W. Trappe, and T. A. Trappe Resistance exercise and cyclooxygenase (COX) expression in human skeletal muscle: implications for COX-inhibiting drugs and protein synthesis Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, June 1, 2007; 292(6): R2241 - R2248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Shen, V. Prisk, Y. Li, W. Foster, and J. Huard Inhibited skeletal muscle healing in cyclooxygenase-2 gene-deficient mice: the role of PGE2 and PGF2{alpha} J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2006; 101(4): 1215 - 1221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. A. Bondesen, S. T. Mills, and G. K. Pavlath The COX-2 pathway regulates growth of atrophied muscle via multiple mechanisms Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, June 1, 2006; 290(6): C1651 - C1659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A Vignaud, J Cebrian, I Martelly, J.-P Caruelle, and A Ferry Effect of anti-inflammatory and antioxidant drugs on the long-term repair of severely injured mouse skeletal muscle Exp Physiol, July 1, 2005; 90(4): 487 - 495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. J. Evans Protein Nutrition, Exercise and Aging J. Am. Coll. Nutr., December 1, 2004; 23(suppl_6): 601S - 609S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. A. Bondesen, S. T. Mills, K. M. Kegley, and G. K. Pavlath The COX-2 pathway is essential during early stages of skeletal muscle regeneration Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, August 1, 2004; 287(2): C475 - C483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Horsley and G. K. Pavlath Prostaglandin F2{alpha} stimulates growth of skeletal muscle cells via an NFATC2-dependent pathway J. Cell Biol., April 14, 2003; 161(1): 111 - 118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. A. Trappe, F. White, C. P. Lambert, D. Cesar, M. Hellerstein, and W. J. Evans Effect of ibuprofen and acetaminophen on postexercise muscle protein synthesis Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, March 1, 2002; 282(3): E551 - E556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Submit a related Letter to the Editor Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints, Permissions and Rights Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Trappe, T. A. Articles by Evans, W. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Trappe, T. A. Articles by Evans, W. J.