help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fritz, S.
Right arrow Articles by Mayerhofer, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fritz, S.
Right arrow Articles by Mayerhofer, A.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 86, No. 1 349-354
Copyright © 2001 by The Endocrine Society


Original Studies

Expression of Muscarinic Receptor Types in the Primate Ovary and Evidence for Nonneuronal Acetylcholine Synthesis1

S. Fritz, I. Wessler, R. Breitling, W. Rossmanith, S. R. Ojeda, G. A. Dissen, A. Amsterdam2 and A. Mayerhofer

Anatomisches Institut, Technische Universität München (S.F., A.M.), D-80802 München, Germany; Pharmakologisches Institut, Universität Mainz (I.W.), D-55101 Mainz, Germany; Institute for Mammalian Genetics, Genome Analysis Center, GSF-National Research Center for Environment and Health (R.B.), D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany; Frauenklinik, Diakonissenkrankenhaus (W.R.), 76199 Karlsruhe-Rüppurr, Germany; Division of Neuroscience, Oregon Regional Primate Research Center-Oregon Health Sciences University (S.R.O., G.A.D.), Beaverton, Oregon 97006; and Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science (A.A.), Rehovot 76100, Israel

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Artur Mayerhofer, M.D., Anatomisches Institut, Universitat München, Biedersteinerstrasse 29, D-80802 München, Germany. E-mail: mayerhofer{at}lrz.tu- muenchen.de.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The presence of muscarinic receptors (MR) in the ovary of different species has been recognized, but the identity of these receptors as well as ovarian sources of their natural ligand, acetylcholine (ACh), have not been determined. Because luteinized human granulosa cells (GC) in culture express functional MR, we have determined whether the group of the related MR subtypes, M1R, M3R, and M5R, are present in vivo in human and rhesus monkey ovaries. To this end, ribonucleic acids (RNAs) of different human and monkey ovaries as well as RNAs from human GC and monkey oocytes were reverse transcribed and subjected to PCR amplification, followed by sequencing of the amplified complementary DNAs. Results obtained showed that M1R, M3R, and M5R messenger RNAs are present in adult human and monkey ovaries; oocytes express exclusively the M3R subtype, whereas GC express M1R and M5R. To determine the ovarian source(s) of the natural ligand of these ACh receptors, we attempted to localize the enzyme responsible for its synthesis with the help of a monoclonal antibody recognizing choline acetyltransferase for immunohistochemistry. In neither human nor monkey sections did we detect immunoreactive choline acetyltransferase-positive fibers or nerve cells, but, surprisingly, GC of antral follicles showed prominent staining. To determine whether GC can produce ACh, human cultured GC derived from preovulatory follicles were analyzed using a high pressure liquid chromatography technique. The results showed that these cells contained ACh in concentrations ranging from 4.2–11.5 pmol/106 cells. Samples of a rat granulosa cell line likewise contained ACh. Thus, the ovary contains multiple MR, and GC of antral follicles are able to synthesize ACh, the ligand of MR. We propose that ACh may serve as an as yet unrecognized factor involved in the complex regulation of ovarian function in the primate, e.g. regulation of cell proliferation or progesterone production.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE NEUROTRANSMITTER acetylcholine (ACh) is widely distributed in the central and peripheral nervous systems. ACh can activate two classes of receptors, nicotinic and muscarinic receptors (MR), the latter belonging to the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors. Five genes have been described, each encoding a different receptor subtype (M1R–M5R) (1). Three subtypes, M1R, M3R, and M5R, couple through Gq/11 to activate phospholipase C, which initiates a response involving phosphatidylinositol turnover. The remaining two subtypes, M2R and M4R, inhibit adenyl cyclase activity via activation of the Gi class of G proteins. Both nicotinic and muscarinic receptors are known to mediate the diverse actions of ACh in the central nervous system as well as throughout nonnervous tissues innervated by the parasympathetic nervous system. There is accumulating evidence that in addition to acting as a classical neurotransmitter, ACh is involved in the regulation of a variety of cellular functions, including mitosis (2), differentiation (3), cell-cell contact (4), secretion (5), and immune functions (6). Moreover, ACh may be produced and exert specific actions in peripheral tissues that are not innervated by cholinergic fibers. For example, the existence of the biosynthetic enzyme choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) and of ACh itself was demonstrated in epithelial, mesothelial, endothelial, and muscle cells, cells of the immune system, and in placenta (7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14). At least some of these ACh-producing cells, including epithelial (15), endothelial (16), and immune cells (17), also express nicotinic and muscarinic receptors, suggesting that ACh may serve as a locally produced regulatory factor.

The ovary is innervated by the autonomous nervous system. However, whether the ovary receives cholinergic innervation is unclear despite earlier reports indicating the presence of immunoreactivity of the ACh-inactivating enzyme, ACh esterase, in fibers (18, 19, 20, 21). Importantly, to our knowledge the ACh-synthesizing enzyme ChAT has not been reported in the ovary. This apparent lack of direct proof of a source for ACh is puzzling in respect to several other reports indicating that ACh receptors are present in the ovary (5, 22). For example, functional muscarinic receptors were demonstrated by Batra et al. (23), who performed radioligand binding assays showing muscarinic binding sites in membrane fractions of human ovaries, ovarian tumors and tumor cell lines. Using different experimental approaches we previously demonstrated the existence of MR in luteinized human GC, isolated from human preovulatory follicles (24). GC contain M1R messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) and express functional M1R linked to the acute mobilization of intracellular Ca2+ (24, 25). Importantly, in GC cultures a cholinergic agonist, acting via M1R, as determined by concomitant incubation with pirenzepine, stimulated cell proliferation after 24 h of treatment, indicating that ACh in vitro may act as a mitogen in these ovarian cells. Despite Ca2+-mobilizing effects of the MR agonist in vitro and the presence of M1R mRNA in GC, it is unclear whether GC express MR in vivo and whether ACh mediates cell proliferation in growing follicles in vivo. For such an effect to occur, the presence of ACh would be required at sufficiently high concentrations in the ovary and in particular in the follicle. Results (23) obtained in GC cultures suggested that GC may represent a potential cellular source of ACh in the ovary. Thus, cultured GC were shown to possess immunoreactivity of the ACh-synthesizing enzyme ChAT, and they contain the vesicular ACh transporter (VAChT) (24).

The present study now demonstrates both the presence of ovarian MR (M1R, M3R, and M5R) in vivo and the local production of ACh by GC in the primate ovary.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Tissue samples

Frozen fragments of human ovaries were obtained from surgery performed on a 36-yr-old and a 46-yr-old woman at the Women’s Hospital at the University of Ulm (Ulm, Germany) and rapidly frozen on dry ice (for extraction of RNA). The study was approved by the local ethics committee, and the women gave their written consent. Additional ovarian samples had been fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin for initial histological evaluation. For the retrospective evaluation, sections (5 µm) from these blocks were cut and used for immunohistochemistry, as described below.

Monkey ovaries were obtained through the tissue distribution program at the Oregon Regional Primate Research Center (ORPRC) and were collected from animals used for unrelated studies. The care and housing of rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) at the ORPRC were previously described (26). Animal protocols and experiments were approved by the ORPRC animal care and use committee, and studies were conducted in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Ovaries and in two cases brain samples were collected from rhesus macaques at necropsy. In total, ovaries from 12 monkeys, ranging from 5 months to 17 yr of age, and two brain samples were examined. Upon collection, tissues were rapidly frozen on dry ice for extraction of RNA (9 animals) or were fixed in Bouin’s fixative for subsequent paraffin embedding and immunohistochemistry (3 animals).

Rhesus monkey oocytes were retrieved from monkeys at the ORPRC by follicle aspiration after administration of human (h) gonadotropins to promote development of multiple preovulatory follicles (27). Rhesus monkeys were treated for 7 days with a GnRH antagonist (antide, Are-Serono Group, AAT, Inc., Randolph, MA; 1 mg/kg BW, sc, once daily), which continued during sequential treatment with recombinant (r) hFSH (Gonal-F, Ares-Serono, 30 IU, im, twice daily) for 6 days followed by rhFSH and rhLH (30 IU each, im, twice daily) for 1–3 days. When ultrasonography revealed follicles of 4 mm in diameter, rhCG (1000 IU, im; Ares Serono) was given the next day to induce periovulatory events, including follicular luteinization. Follicles were aspirated from anesthetized monkeys 27 h after hCG injection (28). A total of 13 oocytes retrieved in such a fashion were pooled and used for extraction of RNA. Rat ovarian and brain sections were cut from paraffin-embedded blocks, prepared in a previous study (28), and were used for immunohistochemistry.

Human GC cell culture

Follicular fluid containing GC was derived from in vitro fertilization patients. Isolation and culture of the cells was performed as previously described (25, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33). The experimental procedure and the use of cells were approved by the local ethic committee. Cultures were kept in an incubator at a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 at 37 C. After 24 h, medium was replaced, and nonadherent cells were removed by gentle washing. Cells were harvested for RNA extraction (for subsequent RT-PCR) or for measurement of ACh as indicated below.

GFSHR-17 cell line

The culture of an immobilized rat granulosa cell line (GFSHR-17) was performed as described previously (28), and confluent cultures were harvested for measurement of ACh.

RT-PCR cloning

The sources of total RNA for RT-PCR were ovarian fragments obtained from two women (36 and 46 yr old), human ovarian first strand complementary DNA (cDNA; made from 10 female Caucasians, aged 21–70; CLONTECH Laboratories, Inc., Heidelberg, Germany), rhesus monkey ovaries from 9 animals ranging in age from 5 months to 17 yr, and monkey oocytes.

RNA was prepared using a RNA extraction kit (RNEasy, QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) or, in the case of monkey RNA, by the acid-phenol extraction method as described previously (34). We used 200 ng ovarian total RNA for RT using an 18- to 24-mer polydeoxythymidine primer (MWG Biotech, Munich, Germany) and Moloney’s murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Stratagene, Heidelberg, Germany) as previously described (24).

The PCR reactions were carried out in a PTC-200 Peltier Thermal Cycler (Biozym, Hessisch Oldendorf, Germany) using Taq polymerase (Promega Corp., Heidelberg, Germany) as previously described (35). PCR amplification consisted of 30 cycles of denaturing (94 C, 1 min), annealing (55 C, 1 min), and extension (72 C, 1 min) and a final extension step (72 C, 5 min). The PCR reaction products were separated on 2% agarose gels and visualized with ethidium bromide. For most PCR reactions we used nested primers for specific reamplification. For the nested PCR reaction the first set of primers was removed using a PCR purification kit (QIAGEN), and 1/10th of the purified PCR reaction was used for the nested PCR reaction.

For the identification of the MR subtypes the following primer combinations for first and nested PCR steps were used. The M1R-specific primers used correspond to the human M1R mRNA sequence (GenBank accession no. X15263): M1R 5'-sense primer, 5'-AGTGGTGATCAAGATGCC-3' [corresponding to nucleotides (nt) 997-1014]; M1R 3'antisense primer, 5'-TTGCAGAGTGCGTAGCAC-3' (complementary to nt 1348–1365); M1R nested 5'-sense primer, 5'-AGCTCCCCAAATACAGTC-3' (corresponding to nt 1061–1078); and M1R nested 3'-antisense primer, 5'-ACAGTCCTTGCAGAAGGT-3' (complementary to nt 1265–1282). The M3R-specific primers were designed according to the human M3R mRNA sequence (GenBank accession no. X15265): M3R 5'-sense primer, 5'-AGATTGTGCCTGCCACGC-3' (corresponding to nt 1173–1190); M3R 3'-antisense primer, 5'-AGGTGGCGTTGCACAGAG-3' (complementary to nt 1461–1478); M3R nested 5'-sense primer, 5'-CAAGTTCGCCAGCATCGC-3' (corresponding to nt 1225–1242); and M3R nested 3'-antisense primer, 5'-CATAGCAGGCAGGGTTGA-3' (complementary to nt 1443–1460). The M5R-specific primers correspond to the human M5R mRNA sequence (GenBank accession no. M80333; M5R 5'-sense primer, 5'-GCAGCTGTGACTGCTGTGGTAAGC-3' (corresponding to nt 348–371); M5R 3'-antisense primer, 5'-TTGGAGGTCAGCCAGGTCCTTGGT-3' (complementary to nt 916–940); M5R nested 5'-sense primer, 5'-GTAAGCCTGATCACCATTGTG-3' (corresponding to nt 366–386); and M5R nested 3'-antisense primer, 5'-TTTTCGGAGTACGCTTGGCCC-3' (complementary to nt 662–684). For the identification of carnitin acetyltransferase (CRAT; GenBank accession no. AA77895), a single RT-PCR amplification with primers corresponding to the human sequence [CRAT 5'-sense primer, 5'-TCCTGTTGAGTTCGAAGC-3' (corresponding to nt 33–50); CRAT 3'-antisense primer: 5'- CCCACGGTTGCCGCTGTT-3' (complementary to nt 375–392)] was performed.

The identity of PCR products obtained was confirmed by sequencing (35) using a fluorescence-based dideoxy sequencing reaction (Prism Ready Reaction Dye terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit), and AmpliTaq DNA polymerase as previously reported (24). Automated sequence analysis was performed on an ABI model 377 DNA sequencer (Perkin-Elmer Corp., Überlingen, Germany). The cDNAs were sequenced directly or after subcloning into the vector pGEMT (Promega Corp.).

Immunohistochemistry

The tissue distribution of ChAT was examined by immunohistochemistry, using a commercially available monoclonal antibody recognizing rat and human ChAT. The procedures for detection using the avidin-biotin complex were performed as previously described (24, 33), with the exception of an additional step, antigen retrieval by microwave treatment. For this purpose dewaxed tissues sections were heated in a microwave oven in 10 mmol/L citrate buffer (1.8 mmol/L citric acid, 8.2 mmol/L sodium citrate, pH 6.0) for 15 min at 800 watts and for another 15 min at 300–350 watts. Incubation with the antiserum was carried out at 4 C overnight in a humidified chamber. We used a commercial antibody (ChAT monoclonal mouse antihuman choline-acetyltransferase; Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany) at a dilution of 1:100, which produced prominent staining of neurons and processes in the brain. Biotinylated secondary antiserum (goat antirabbit IgG or goat antimouse; Camon, Wiesbaden, Germany), diluted 1:500 in PBS, containing 1% BSA and a commercial avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex kit (Vectastain, Camon) were subsequently used. The immunoreactions were visualized with 0.01% H2O2 and 0.05% diaminobenzidene solution (in 0.05 mol/L Tris-HCl, pH 7.6). Control sections were incubated in the absence of the first antibody. In addition, the antibody was replaced by nonimmune normal mouse sera (1:1000–1:5000). A Carl Zeiss (Jena, Germany) Axiovert microscope was used for examination of the staining reactions.

Measurement of ACh

ACh was measured by cationic exchange high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) combined with bioreactors and electrochemical detection, as described previously in detail (9, 36, 37). GC cultured for 3 days (three different pools of cells) or 7 days (one pool of cells) were ground in 700 µL ice-cold 15% formic acid in acetone. After incubation on ice (30 min), the supernatant was evaporated to dryness by nitrogen. The dried sample was resuspended in 700 µL HPLC mobile phase buffer (60 mmol/L phosphate buffer with 0.3 mmol/L ethylenediamine tetraacetate; pH 8.5 adjusted), and 20 µL were injected. Detection limit was 10 fmol ACh/injection in a microbore HPLC system (BAS, West Lafayette, IN). The analytical column was a 1-mm x 53-cm cation exchanger (Uni Jet, BAS). Between the analytical column and the electrochemical detector a bioreactor (Step Stik, BAS) was placed. It was packed with immobilized ACh esterase (to hydrolyze ACh) and choline oxidase (to oxidase choline originating from ACh to betain and hydrogen peroxide; hydrogen peroxide correlates with the mount of ACh and can be detected electrochemically). ACh content of each sample was measured twice and quantified by comparison with external ACh standard. The specificity of the ACh peak detected in the cell extract was further proven in most cases by using an analytical column packed with 40 U ACh esterase; this application specifically eliminates the ACh peak, whereas the choline peak remains (9).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Identification of M1R, M3R, and M5R mRNAs from human and monkey ovaries

A commercially available cDNA pooled from 10 human ovaries was subjected to PCR amplification using genespecific primers. Sequence analysis of the PCR products showed that M1R, M3R, and M5R mRNA species are contained in the human ovary (Fig. 1Go; cDNAs of 222 bp for M1R, 235 bp for M3R, and 318 bp for M5R). Performing RT-PCR on reverse transcribed mRNA isolated from ovarian samples of 1 pre- and 1 perimenopausal women (36 and 46 yr old, respectively) also identified these 3 MR subtypes (data not shown). Human GC, in contrast, expressed only M1R and M5R subtypes, but not M3R. The cDNAs coding for these 3 MR subtypes were also found in ovaries from rhesus monkeys ranging from 5 months to 17 yr of age (9 different animals in total). The results are shown for an adult (7-yr-old) animal (Fig. 1Go). We also examined RNA from rhesus monkey oocytes (13 pooled oocytes) obtained from preovulatory follicles. Although no M1R and M5R cDNAs were isolated, M3R cDNAs were readily amplified (Fig. 1Go). Sequence analysis the PCR products showed 100% sequence homology between the human (n = 2) and monkey (n = 1) M1R sequences. In contrast, sequencing of rhesus monkey cDNAs (n = 4 different samples) demonstrated that they differ in 3 bases (nt 1249, C->T; nt 1369, C->T; nt 1399, G->A) compared with the known human M3R sequence (1 sample sequenced) for the M3R. The resulting homology is 98.7% between the human and monkey M3R nucleotide sequence. The monkey sequence was submitted to GenBank (monkey M3R sequence, GenBank accession no. AF148140). These nucleotide substitutions did not alter the deduced amino acid composition of the M3R protein (human M3R sequence, GenBank accession no. X15265). Primers corresponding to sequences of the published human M5R sequence amplified a cDNA product in human GC and human ovary (2 samples). Sequence analysis showed 100% homology with the published sequence (M5R sequence, GenBank accession no. M80333). Similar RT-PCR products were obtained in rhesus monkey ovary and brain cDNAs. Sequencing of 2 individual monkey brain samples identified 3 nucleotide changes compared with the human sequence (nt 488, A->G; nt 542, C->T; nt 559, A->G). The monkey M5R sequence was submitted to GenBank (accession no. AF285237). These nucleotide substitutions did also not alter the deduced amino acid composition of the M5R protein.



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Ovarian MR gene expression. Ethidium bromide-stained 2% agarose gel with representative results of nested RT-PCR are shown for cDNA products corresponding to M1R (222 bp), M3R (235 bp), and M5R (318 bp). Note that PCR amplification of reverse transcribed human ovarian mRNA from a pool of 10 different samples showed products for M1R, M3R, and M5R. Similar results were obtained in two individual ovarian samples that probably also contained follicles in different developing stages and corpora lutea as well as oocytes (not shown). Human GC expressed only M1R and M5R, but not M3R. As in human ovary, M1R, M3R, and M5R subtypes were present in the adult rhesus monkey ovary. Rhesus monkey oocytes (pool of 13 oocytes) exclusively expressed the M3R subtype.

 
Immunohistochemical identification of ChAT in primate ovary and rat brain

In rhesus monkey ovary ChAT immunoreactivity was found in GC of healthy, large antral follicles (Fig. 2AGo). A similar location was apparent in the human (data not shown) and rat ovary (Fig. 2CGo). No staining of any other cell or cell processes or fibers was observed. As a positive control, rat brain sections as well as human adrenal samples (data not shown) were tested and showed a distinct ChAT staining of neuronal cell bodies and processes, as shown in Fig. 2DGo. Controls with nonimmune serum (Fig. 2BGo) or omission of first antibody were negative.



View larger version (114K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Immunohistochemical detection of ChAT in rhesus monkey ovary (A), rat ovary (C), and rat brain (D; ChAT-specific monoclonal antibody; 1:100). The ChAT signal was not observed in controls. An example, a control using nonimmune mouse serum (1:1000), is shown for a monkey ovary section (B). Prominent ChAT immunoreactive staining was found in large healthy antral follicles of both monkey (A) and rat (C) ovary. A brainstem section shows ChAT staining of neuronal cell bodies and processes (D). Bars, 250 µm (A), 20 µm (A, inset), 70 µm (B), 70 µm (C), and 40 µm (D).

 
ACh measurement

Detection of local ACh production in human GC (day 3 of culture) with HPLC analysis in three different samples yielded concentrations from 4.2–11.5 pmol/106 cells (Table 1Go; one example shown in Fig. 3BGo). In human GC cultured for 7 days no ACh was detected. The use of an esterase column abolished the ACh peak, but not the choline peak (Fig. 3CGo). In addition, samples of rat GC (GFSHR-17) were analyzed. A total of seven different measurements showed that ACh was apparent at a concentration of 8.2 ± 1.7 pmol/106 cells (mean ± SD). As shown for human GC, the ACh peak was verified by using an ACh esterase column. The ACh peak disappeared, proving the specificity of the measurements.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. ACh measurements in human GCs (pmol/106 cells)

 


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Detection of ACh by HPLC. HPLC chromatogram showing 1 pmol ACh standard, followed by HPLC chromatogram of human GC extract, demonstrating a peak corresponding to ACh. The identity of ACh was further proven by the cleavage of ACh by ACh esterase packed on an analytical column. Note that the column specifically eliminated the ACh peak (arrow), but not the choline peak. All figures are of identical scale, and concentrations were calculated by comparison with the signal obtained for the samples of the standard.

 
Determination of CRAT and phylogenetic study of ACh transferase

We performed RT-PCR on reverse transcribed mRNA from human GC, human ovary, and pooled human ovarian cDNA with ChAT-specific primers as reported by Misawa et al. (14), but did not obtain ChAT products (data not shown). Because other transferases, namely CRAT, are known to be able to synthesize ACh, we attempted to examine whether ovarian cells express CRAT. We readily amplified a CRAT-specific product proved by sequencing, as shown for human GC (Fig. 4Go). ChAT and CRAT are 40% identical at the amino acid level, with long continuous stretches of identical amino acids. An analysis of the phylogenetic relationship between ChAT and CRAT indicated a common ancestor with an original carnitine substrate (Fig. 5Go).



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. The gene for the acetyltransferase CRAT is expressed by GC. Amplification of reverse transcribed human GC mRNA showed a distinct CRAT product, 324 bp in length. The control (Co) shown was amplified without template.

 


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Phylogenetic tree of vertebrate acetyltransferases (CRAT/ChAT) determined by parsimony analysis (47 ). Neighbor-joining and maximum likelihood analysis yield the same tree topology (not shown). A fungal carnitine acetyltransferase is used as an out-group. Bootstrap support from 100 pseudoreplicates is indicated at the branches. (ChAT EC 2.3.1.6, CRAT EC 2.3.1.7; accession no.: human ChAT, P28329; pig ChAT, P13222; mouse ChAT, Q03059; rat ChAT, P32738; human CRAT, P43155; mouse CRAT, P47934; pigeon CRAT, P52826; Pyricularia CRAT, AAB88887).

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Previous reports suggested an involvement of the neurotransmitter ACh in the regulation of ovarian function in several species, including primates (5, 22, 23, 24, 25). The present study provides molecular evidence for the presence of M1R, M3R, and M5R subtypes in the primate ovary. A salient feature of this finding was the differential localization of the receptors. Although GC expressed M1R and M5R, M3R were detected exclusively on oocytes. Our results pinpoint GC as the producers of ACh, indicating that this ovarian neurotransmitter can act in an autocrine/paracrine fashion.

Muscarinic binding sites in plasma membrane fractions of human ovarian cells and ovarian tumor cells were described previously by Batra et al. (23) using the tritiated 1-quinuclidinyl benzilate radioligand in combination with the nicotinic and muscarinic agonist carbachol and the M1R subtype-specific antagonist pirenzepine. The researchers speculated that, based on the specificity of the ligand, the ovarian muscarinic binding correspond to MR and that they correspond mainly to the M3R subtype. Our results demonstrated the molecular identification of ovarian MR; M3Rs are present in both the monkey and human ovary and in monkey oocytes, but in addition M1R and M5R are expressed in GC of the primate ovary. At least one of these receptors, M1R, was shown previously in isolated cultured human luteinized GC (24) to be functional, as demonstrated by increased intracellular Ca2+ levels upon cholinergic stimulation (24). Moreover, activation of this MR resulted in increased cell proliferation (24). To what degree the closely related M5R, now found to be also present in GC, may contribute to these effects, is currently not known.

Since activation of M1R, M3R, and M5R in vivo requires the presence of ACh, identification of potential sources of ACh production became an important issue. Several possible sources can be envisioned, namely innervation and/or local intraovarian production by neuron-like cells (34) and/or endocrine cells. The latter possibility was supported by our recent findings in GC. Thus, we detected VAChT, the specific transporter responsible for the uptake of ACh in vesicles in cultured human GC (24). Unfortunately, the antibody used in this previous study did not allow immunohistochemical detection of VAChT in fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues available for the present study. However, using RT-PCR we amplified from human ovarian samples, a cDNA corresponding to the VAChT sequence (data not shown). The results of a previous study (24) also showed that GC possess immunoreactivity for ChAT. A specific monoclonal antibody was used for these studies which, for example, recognizes ChAT-immunoreactive neurons in the brain and peripheral neurons in the adrenal medulla (not shown). Using the same antibody, we observed that ChAT immunoreactivity was localized in the in vivo counterpart of isolated GC, namely GC of large healthy follicles in both monkey and human ovary (not shown) as well as rat ovary. The avascular GC compartment of follicles, which is also devoid of any nerve fibers, may thus be comparable with other tissues that synthesize ACh, namely placenta (14, 38) and skin (9).

To determine, whether GC indeed are able to produce ACh, we chose a direct approach, measurement of ACh production by cultured human GC and rat GC cell lines. HPLC detection of ACh unequivocally showed that human GC contain ACh, which can be cleaved by ACh cholinesterase. The same result was achieved using a rat GC cell line. Despite the presence of ACh in GC, we currently have only limited information about the ACh biosynthesis pathway in these cells. The specific ChAT immunoreactivity suggests that genuine ChAT is involved. However, several attempts to amplify ChAT by RT-PCR using published oligonucleotide primer sequences (14, 39) failed to produce ChAT cDNA in our hands (unpublished data). This may indicate that unknown splice variants of ChAT exist in the ovary (14) and/or that ACh in these cells may not be produced by ChAT, but, rather, by another structurally and functionally related ACh-synthesizing enzyme, for example an acetyltransferase such as CRAT. That CRAT enzyme is able to synthesize ACh was shown previously (40, 41, 42), and this enzyme with a 40.3% overall amino acid homology to ChAT was easily amplified in reverse transcribed mRNA of human GC in this study. The high degree of similarity between ChAT and CRAT might also explain the cross-reactivity of the antibody used. As discussed previously by Lönnerberg and Ibanez (43), who demonstrated the expression of truncated and thus nonfunctional ChAT mRNA in the testis, testicular CRAT may be responsible for ACh production in the male gonad. Clearly, the synthesizing enzyme(s) involved in ACh production in the ovary remains to be elucidated.

Regardless of the nature of the synthesizing enzyme(s), these results suggest that GC-derived ACh may act in an autocrine and paracrine fashion on several cells within the ovary that contain M1R, M5R, or M3R. Our previous in vitro results (24) using cultured human GC suggested that ACh can act as a mitogen for these cells. In cultured human GC we recently identified another consequence of MR activation, namely stimulation of the levels of steroid acute regulatory protein. As a consequence GC were more responsive to hCG after cholinergic stimulation, resulting in augmented progesterone production (44). The actions ACh may exert on oocytes remain to be determined. However, several studies have shown that activation of a G protein-coupled signal transduction system, can initiate in oocytes a series of intracellular changes leading to events required for fertilization (45, 46).

In summary, the present results and those previously reported (22, 23, 24, 25) support the concept of a novel muscarinergic regulatory system in the ovary, involving local ACh production and its actions via M1R, M3R, and M5R differentially expressed in the ovary. The functions of this proposed system in vivo is not known, but based on results from in vitro experiments (22, 23, 24, 25, 44) and the present study, we speculate that possible functions of ovarian ACh include regulation of cell proliferation in developing follicles and modulation of steroid production.


    Acknowledgments
 
We are grateful to U. Berg and F. D. Berg for the gift of human GC. We thank R. Grünert, A. Thalhammer, M. Rauchfuß, B. Zschiesche, and A. Mauermayer for technical assistance.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by grants from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Ma 1080/10–1 and 1080/12–1), Volkswagen-Stiftung, and NIH (HD-24870 and RR-00163), as well as by NICHD/NIH through cooperative agreement U54 HD18185 as part of the Specialized Cooperative Centers Program in Reproduction Research. Back

2 Incumbent of the Joyce and Ben B. Eisenberg Professional Chair of Endocrinology and Cancer Research at the Weizmann Institute of Science. Back

Received November 10, 1999.

Revised September 25, 2000.

Accepted September 29, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Hulme EC, Birdsall NJM, Buckley NJ. 1990 Muscarinic receptor subtypes. Annu Rev Toxicol. 30:633–673.[CrossRef]
  2. Grando SA, Crosby AM, Zelickson BD, Dahl MV. 1993 Agarose gel keratinocyte outgrowth system as a model of skin re-epithelization: requirement of endogenous acetylcholine for outgrowth initiation. J Invest Dermatol. 101:804–810.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Lauder JM, Schambra UB. 1999 Morphogenetic roles of acetylcholine. Environ Health Perspect. 107:65–69.
  4. Williams CL, Hayes VY, Hummel AM, Tarara JE, Halsey TJ. 1993 Regulation of E-cadherin-mediated adhesion by muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in small lung carcinoma. J Cell Biol. 121:643–654.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Luck MR. 1990 Cholinergic stimulation, through muscarinic receptors, of oxytocin and progesteron secretion from bovine granulosa cells undergoing spontaneous luteinzation in serum-free culture. Endocrinology. 126:1256–1263.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Kawashima K, Fujii T, Watanbe Y, Misawa H. 1998 Acetylcholine synthesis and muscarinic receptor subtype mRNA expression in T-lymphocytes. Life Sci. 62:1701–1705.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Wessler I, Kirkpatrick CJ, Racke K. 1998 Non-neuronal acetylcholine, a locally acting molecule, widely distributed in biological systems: expression and function in humans. Pharmacol Ther. 77:59–79.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Kawashima K, Fujii T, Watanbe Y, Misawa H. 1996 Acetylcholine synthesis and muscarinic receptors subtype mRNA expression in T-lymphocytes. Neurosci Lett. 214:171–174.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Klapproth H, Reinheimer T, Metzen J, et al. 1997 Non-neuronal acetylcholine, a signalling molecule synthesized by surface cells of rat and man. Naunyn Schmiedeberg Arch Pharmacol. 355:515–523.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Gonzalez JL, Santos-Benito FF. 1987 Synthesis of acetylcholine by endothelial cells isolated from rat brain cortex capillaries. Brain Res. 412:148–150.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Fujii T, Tshuchiya T, Yamada S, Fujimoto K, Suzuki T, Kasahara T, Kawashima K. 1996 Localization and syntheisis of acetylcholine in human leukemic T cell lines. J Neurosci Res. 44:66–72.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Grando SA, Kist DA, Qi M, Dahl MV. 1993 Human keratinocytes synthesize, secrete, and degradate acetylcholine. J Invest Dermatol. 101:32–36.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Wessler I, Kirkpatrick CJ, Racke K. 1999 The cholinergic ‘pitfall’: acetylcholine, a universal cell molecule in biological systems, including humans. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 26:198–205.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Misawa H, Matsuura J, Oda Y, Takahashi R, Daguchi T. 1997 Human choline acetyltransferase mRNAs with different 5'-region produce a 69-kDa major translation product. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 44:323–333.[Medline]
  15. Grando SA, Zelickson BD, Kist DA, et al. 1995 Keratinocyte muscarinic acetylcholine receptors: Immunolocalization and partial characterization. J Invest Dermatol. 104:95–100.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Brunner F, Kukovetz WR. 1986 Muscarinic receptors of the vascular bed: radioligand binding studies on bovine splenic veins. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 8:712–721.[Medline]
  17. Costa LG, Kaylor G, Murphy D. 1988 Muscarinic cholinergic binding sites an rat lymphocytes. Immunopharmacology. 16:139–149.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Burden HW. 1978 Ovarian innervation. In: Jones RE, ed. The vertebrate ovary. Competititve biology and evolution. New York: Plenum Press; 615–638.
  19. Bulmer D. 1965 A histochemical study of ovarian cholinesterases. Acta Anat. 62:254–265.[Medline]
  20. Jacobowitz D, Wallach EE. 1967 Histochemical and chemical studies of the autonomic innervation of the ovary. Endocrinology. 81:1132–1139.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Stjernquist M. 1996 Autonomic-endocrine interactions. Innervation of ovarian and testicular endocrine cells. In: Unsicker K, ed. Amsterdam: Harwood; 231–256.
  22. Moreley P, Tsang BK, Whitfield JF, Schwartz JL. 1992 The effect of muscarinic cholinergic agonists on intracellular calcium and progesterone production by chicken granulosa cells. Endocrinology. 130:663–670.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Batra S, Popper LD, Iosif CS. 1993 Characterization of muscarinic cholinergic receptors in human ovaries, ovarian tumours and tumour cell lines. Eur J Cancer. 29:1302–1306.[CrossRef]
  24. Fritz S, Föhr KJ, Boddien S, Berg U, Brucker C, Mayerhofer A. 1999 Functional and molecular characterization of a muscarinic receptor type and evidence for expression of choline-acetyltransferase and vesicular transporter in human granulosa cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 84:1744–1750.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Mayerhofer A, Föhr KJ, Sterzik K, Gratzl M. 1992 Carbachol increases intracellular free calcium concentrations in human granulosa-lutein cells in vitro. J Endocrinol. 135:153–159.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. VandeVoort CA, Molskness TA, Stouffer RL. 1988 Adenylate cyclase in the primate corpus luteum during chorionic gonadotropin treatment simulating early pregnancy: homologous versus heterologous desensitization. Endocrinology. 122:734–740.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Zelinski-Wooten MB, Hutchison JS, Trinchard-Lugan I, Hess DL, Wolf DP, Stouffer RL. 1997 Initiation of periovulatory events in gonadotrophinstimulated macaques with varying doses of recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin. Hum Reprod. 12:1877–1885.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Grosse J, Bulling A, Brucker C, Berg U, Amsterdam A, Mayerhofer A, Gratzl M. 2000 Synaptosome-associated protein of 25 kilodalton in oocytes and steroid-producing cells of rat and human ovary: molecular analysis and regulation by gonadotropins. Biol Reprod. 63:643–650.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Mayerhofer A, Sterzik K, Link H, Wiemann M, Gratzl M. 1993 Oxytocin increases intracellular free calcium concentrations in human granulosa-lutein cells in vitro. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 77:1209–1214.[Abstract]
  30. Mayerhofer A, Lahr G, Fröhlich U, Zienecker R, Sterzik K, Gratzl M. 1994 Expression and alternative splicing of the neural cell adhesion molecule NCAM in human granulosa cells during luteinization. FEBS Lett. 346:207–212.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Mayerhofer A, Engling R, Stecher B, Ecker A, Sterzik K, Gratzl M. 1995 Relaxin triggers calcium transients in human granulosa-lutein cells. Eur J Endocrinol. 132:507–513.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Föhr KF, Mayerhofer A, Sterzik K, Rudolf M, Rosenbusch B, Gratzl M. 1993 Concerted action of human chorionic gonadotropin and norepinephrine on intracellular free calcium in human granulosa-lutein cells: evidence for the presence of a functional alpha-adrenergic receptor. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 76:367–373.[Abstract]
  33. Mayerhofer A, Hemmings Jr HC, Snyder GL, Greengard P, Boddien S, Berg U, Brucker C. 1999 Functional dopamine-1 receptors and DARPP-32 are expressed in human ovary and granulosa luteal cells in vitro. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 84:257–264.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Mayerhofer A, Smith GD, Danilichik M, Levine JE, Wolf DP, Dissen GA, Ojeda SR. 1998 Oocytes are a source of catecholamines in the primate ovary: evidence for a novel cell-cell regulatory loop in the ovary. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 95:10990–10995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Mayerhofer A, Dissen GA, Costa ME, Ojeda SR. 1997 A role for neurotransmitters in early follicular development: induction of functional FSH receptors in newly formed follicles. Endocrinology. 138:3320–3329.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Wessler I, Bender H, Härle P, et al. 1995 Release of [3H]acetylcholine in human isolated bronchi, effect of indomethacin on muscarinic autoinhibition. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 151:1040–1046.[Abstract]
  37. Reinheimer T, Bernedo P, Klapproth H, Oelert H, Zeiske B, Racké K, Wessler I. 1996 Acetylcholine in isolated airways of rat, guinea-pig, and human: species differences in the role of airway mucosa. Am J Physiol. 270:L722–L728.
  38. Sastry BV. 1997 Human placental cholinergic system. Biochem Pharmacol. 53:1577–1586.[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Chireux MA, Le Van Thai A, Weber MJ. 1995 Human choline acetyltransferase gene: localization of alternative first exons. J Neurosci Res. 40:427–438.[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Tucek S. 1982 The synthesis of acetylcholine in skeletal muscles of the rat. J Physiol. 322:53–69.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Goodman DR, Harbison RD. 1981 Characterization of enzymatic acetylcholine synthesis by mouse brain, rat sperm, and purified carnitine acetyltransferase. Biochem Pharmacol. 30:1521–1528.[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Goodman DR, Adatski FK, Harbison RD. 1984 Evidence for the extreme overestimation of choline acetyltransferase in human sperm, human seminal plasma, and rat heart: a case of mistaking carnitine acetyltransferase for choline acetyltransferase. Chem Biol Interact. 49:39–53.[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Lönnerberg P, Ibanez CF. 1999 Novel, testis-specific mRNA transcripts encoding N-terminally truncated choline acetyltransferase. Mol Reprod Dev. 53:274–281.[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Fritz S, Grünert R, Stocco DM, Hales DB, Mayerhofer A. StAR protein is increased by muscarinic receptor activation in human luteinized granulosa cells. J Mol Cell Endocrinol. In press.
  45. Kim JH, Machaty Z, Cabot RA, Han YM, Do HJ, Prather RS. 1998 Development of pig oocytes activated by stimulation of an exogenous G protein-coupled receptor. Biol Reprod. 59:665–660.
  46. Williams CJ, Mehlmann LM, Jaffe LA, Kopf GS, Schultz RM. 1998 Evidence that Gq family proteins do not function in mouse egg fertilization. Dev Biol. 198:116–127.[Medline]
  47. Felsenstein J. 1989 PHYLIP: phylogenetic inference package (version 3.2). Cladistics. 5:164–166.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. O. Al-zi'abi, A. Bowolaksono, and K. Okuda
Survival Role of Locally Produced Acetylcholine in the Bovine Corpus Luteum
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2009; 80(4): 823 - 832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
P. Song, H. S. Sekhon, A. Lu, J. Arredondo, D. Sauer, C. Gravett, G. P. Mark, S. A. Grando, and E. R. Spindel
M3 Muscarinic Receptor Antagonists Inhibit Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Growth and Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Phosphorylation Induced by Acetylcholine Secretion
Cancer Res., April 15, 2007; 67(8): 3936 - 3944.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. Kunz, J. S. Richter, and A. Mayerhofer
The Adenosine 5'-Triphosphate-Sensitive Potassium Channel in Endocrine Cells of the Human Ovary: Role in Membrane Potential Generation and Steroidogenesis
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2006; 91(5): 1950 - 1955.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
D. Platano, M. C. Magli, A. P. Ferraretti, L. Gianaroli, and G. Aicardi
L- and T-Type Voltage-Gated Ca2+ Channels in Human Granulosa Cells: Functional Characterization and Cholinergic Regulation
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2005; 90(4): 2192 - 2197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
V. Trkulja, V. Crljen-Manestar, H. Banfic, and Z. Lackovic
Involvement of the Peripheral Cholinergic Muscarinic System in the Compensatory Ovarian Hypertrophy in the Rat
Experimental Biology and Medicine, September 1, 2004; 229(8): 793 - 805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
R. SASSON, A. DANTES, K. TAJIMA, and A. AMSTERDAM
Novel genes modulated by FSH in normal and immortalized FSH-responsive cells: new insights into the mechanism of FSH action
FASEB J, July 1, 2003; 17(10): 1256 - 1266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. Kunz, A. Thalhammer, F. D. Berg, U. Berg, D. M. Duffy, R. L. Stouffer, G. A. Dissen, S. R. Ojeda, and A. Mayerhofer
Ca2+-Activated, Large Conductance K+ Channel in the Ovary: Identification, Characterization, and Functional Involvement in Steroidogenesis
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2002; 87(12): 5566 - 5574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
R. O. Arellano, A. Martinez-Torres, and E. Garay
Ionic Currents Activated via Purinergic Receptors in the Cumulus Cell-Enclosed Mouse Oocyte
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2002; 67(3): 837 - 846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Fritz, L. Kunz, N. Dimitrijevic, R. Grunert, C. Heiss, and A. Mayerhofer
Muscarinic Receptors in Human Luteinized Granulosa Cells: Activation Blocks Gap Junctions and Induces the Transcription Factor Early Growth Response Factor-1
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2002; 87(3): 1362 - 1367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fritz, S.
Right arrow Articles by Mayerhofer, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fritz, S.
Right arrow Articles by Mayerhofer, A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals