help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khastgir, G.
Right arrow Articles by Chow, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Khastgir, G.
Right arrow Articles by Chow, J.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 86, No. 1 289-295
Copyright © 2001 by The Endocrine Society

Original Studies

Anabolic Effect of Estrogen Replacement on Bone in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis: Histomorphometric Evidence in a Longitudinal Study1

Gautam Khastgir2, John Studd, Nigel Holland, Jamshid Alaghband-Zadeh, Simon Fox and Jade Chow

Department of Gynaecology (G.K., J.S. N.H.), Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, London SW10 9NH; Department of Chemical Pathology (J.A.-Z.), Charing Cross Hospital, London W6 8RP; and Department of Histopathology (S.F., J.C.), St. George’s Hospital Medical School, London SW17 ORE, United Kingdom

Address correspondence to: Dr. J. W. M. Chow, Department of Histopathology, St. George’s Hospital Medical School, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 ORE, United Kingdom. E-mail: j.chow{at}sghms.ac.uk


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
It is well recognized that estrogen (E2) prevents postmenopausal bone loss by suppressing bone resorption. Despite evidence that E2 may also stimulate bone formation in animals, an anabolic effect in humans is still controversial. To investigate this, we studied 22 older postmenopausal females, with a mean age of 65.4 yr and mean interval of 16.9 yr since menopause and low bone mineral density. Transcortical iliac bone biopsies were performed before and 6 yr after E2 replacement therapy (ERT) [75 mg percutaneous E2 replaced 6-monthly plus oral medroxy progesterone acetate (5 mg daily) for 10 days each calendar month]. The mean serum E2 level after 6 yr of treatment was 1077 (range, 180-2568) pmol/L. Bone mineral density improved in every patient, with a median increase of 31.4% at the lumbar spine and 15.1% at the proximal femur. Bone histomorphometry showed an increase in cancellous bone volume from 10.75% to 17.31% (P < 0.001). The wall thickness after 6 yr of E2 treatment was 38.30 µm compared with 31.20 µm before commencement of ERT (P < 0.0005), indicating net bone gain. This is the first report showing histological evidence for an increase in cancellous bone volume, together with an increase in wall thickness, in a longitudinal follow-up study of ERT in older postmenopausal women. Our results show that E2 is capable of exerting an anabolic effect in women with osteoporosis, even when started well into the menopause.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
OSTEOPOROSIS IS CHARACTERIZED by bone loss and disruption of cancellous architecture, resulting in bone fragility and increased susceptibility to fracture (1). Currently available therapies, such as estrogen, bisphosphonates, and calcitonin inhibit bone resorption and lead to moderate increases in bone density and reduction in fractures. In patients with severe osteoporosis, the ideal treatment would be one that stimulates bone formation, increases bone mass, and restores trabecular connectivity.

Despite the established role of estrogen (E2) in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, its mechanism of action on bone is still uncertain. E2 is generally considered to act by suppression of bone resorption, and whether or not E2 exerts an anabolic effect on the human skeleton remains controversial.

There is some evidence to suggest that E2 may exert an anabolic effect in bone. E2 has been shown to stimulate the differentiation and activity of osteoblasts (2, 3). E2 replacement therapy (ERT) has also been shown to increase bone formation and bone mass in animal models (4, 5). In humans, an anabolic effect of E2 before skeletal maturation has been suggested by the low peak bone mass in E2-deficient adolescent girls and in males with rare genetic syndromes of E2 deficiency (6, 7). In postmenopausal women, raised serum osteocalcin 2 weeks after E2 treatment suggests that E2 may stimulate bone formation (8).

Previous studies with ERT, mainly given orally, have failed to demonstrate an anabolic effect of E2 in postmenopausal women (9, 10, 11, 12). We have shown that the anabolic effect of E2 demonstrates dose-responsiveness in rats (5). It is, therefore, possible that a similar anabolic effect in humans may be evident with sc estradiol implants, which produce a higher circulating estradiol level and increase bone mineral density (BMD) substantially more than other routes of administration of ERT in postmenopausal women (13). The effect of estradiol implants on the BMD continues as long as the therapy is given (14) and also exhibits a positive dose response (15). It is, however, unclear whether the rise in BMD is due to new bone formation resulting in greater bone mass or due to increased mineralization of the preexisting osteoporotic bone. A recent cross-sectional study of women on long-term high-dose sc E2 implants found substantial increases in BMD (16), and histomorphometric analysis of their bone biopsies showed a nonsignificant increase in cancellous bone volume but an increase in wall thickness, raising the possibility that E2 may exert an anabolic effect in bone (17).

Because bone resorption and formation are coupled (18) and E2 suppresses bone resorption, any anabolic effect of E2 on bone formation is likely to be masked and limited. E2 also reduces the bone turnover rate and, therefore, clear evidence of a positive bone balance may take some time to develop. With the high bone turnover rate in rodents the anabolic effect of E2 on bone has been shown after short-term therapy (5). In humans, the cancellous bone surface is normally renewed completely every 2–3 yr, whereas the bone turnover period is doubled with ERT (9, 19). Hence, a minimum period of 4–6 yr is likely to be required to demonstrate a clear anabolic effect of E2 on the human skeleton.

The anabolic effect of E2 is ideal for elderly women, who are often deemed too old or their bones too osteoporotic to benefit from ERT. We, therefore, conducted a longitudinal study to evaluate the changes in cancellous bone mass, architecture, and turnover in older postmenopausal women with osteoporosis following sc estradiol implants for 6 yr. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the putative anabolic role of E2 on bone by histomorphometric analysis. The findings have significant implications for the understanding of the action of E2 and for the treatment of osteoporosis.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patient selection and follow-up

Previously untreated postmenopausal women with suspected osteoporosis were invited to participate in the study. Those who had any high risk factor for osteoporosis other than ovarian failure, previous hip fracture or replacement, suffered from medical disorders, or used any drugs known to affect calcium or bone metabolism were excluded. After an initial screening with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan, 36 women of white European origin, who had osteoporosis according to the WHO criteria (1), were selected. Their BMD either in the lumbar spine or proximal femur was more than 2.5 SD below the mean for young female adults (T score, <-2.5). The demographic features including age, parity, height, weight, body mass index (BMI) of these women were recorded. The interval since natural menopause was noted, but those who had a hysterectomy were considered menopausal from the onset of climacteric symptoms or from the time of surgery if ovaries were removed.

The study was approved by the hospital ethics committee, and informed consent was obtained from the patients before each bone biopsy. We could not obtain ethical approval and consent for a placebo/nontreatment control group in a long-term study because the preventative role of ERT in postmenopausal women with osteopororis is well established. After the initial bone biopsy all women received a 75-mg estradiol implant (Organon Laboratories Ltd., Cambridge, UK), inserted sc in the anterior abdominal wall and replaced at 6-month intervals. Those with an intact uterus were initially given oral medroxy progesterone acetate (MPA) (Upjohn Ltd., Crawley, UK), 5 mg daily for 10 days in each month to protect against endometrial hyperplasia. All women were advised to continue ERT for the long term and avoid any other treatment that alters bone metabolism, including calcium supplementation.

Three women withdrew from the study at 6 months, and five women between the first and second year, either due to side effects of ERT or with an illness unrelated to ERT. The side effects included heavy withdrawal bleeding, mastalgia, and headaches. Among those who continued on ERT, three women later developed heavy withdrawal bleeding. This was managed by increasing the dose and duration of MPA as well as reducing the dose of ERT. At the 6-yr follow-up visit, 24 women remained on long-term ERT and agreed to have another bone biopsy, which was successful in 22 women. The dose and duration of estradiol implantation in these women were: 75 mg for 6 yr (n = 19) and 75 mg for 5 yr, followed by 25 mg for the last year (n = 3). The three women in whom the dose of ERT was reduced after 5 yr to avoid heavy withdrawal bleeding were retained in the study because their serum estradiol levels were still within the premenopausal range. In 19 of these women, a second bone biopsy had been taken from the contralateral side after 1 yr of ERT (10) and the third bone biopsy was taken from the ipsilateral iliac crest as the first biopsy. The final bone biopsy was performed 2 months after the insertion of the last implant when the estradiol level was expected to peak, and serum samples were taken on the same day to measure hormone levels. The DEXA scan was repeated to measure the changes in BMD both at the lumbar spine and the proximal femur.

Bone biopsy and histomorphometry

Before each bone biopsy the patients were given two courses of tetracycline spaced 12 days apart, and the transcortical iliac crest biopsy was performed at a standard site 4 days after the second course of tetracycline. The specimens were fixed in 70% alcohol, then dehydrated through graded alcohols and embedded undecalcified in resin (London Resin Co. Ltd., Basingstoke, UK). To reduce intrasample variation in the results, sections were cut from three levels separated by 200 µm, and four nonconsecutive sections were selected for study. Seven-micrometer sections were stained with Goldner’s trichrome and toluidine blue, and 12-µm sections were prepared unstained for fluorescence microscopy. For each sample, two sections were examined with bright field illumination and two other sections under ultraviolet light using a semiautomated computer-assisted image analyzer (Osteomeasure; Osteometrics, Inc., Atlanta, GA).

We measured both static and dynamic histomorphometric parameters as defined by the American Society of Bone and Mineral Research (20) and performed strut analysis to assess cancellous bone architecture (21). Trabecular thickness, separation, and number were derived from measurements of cancellous bone area and surface assuming a parallel plate model (22): 1) cancellous bone volume (%), volume of mineralized bone and nonmineralized bone (osteoid) to total bone tissue volume; 2) trabecular thickness (µm), mean trabecular plate thickness; 3) trabecular separation (µm), mean distance between trabeculae; 4) trabecular number (no./mm2), number of trabeculae in a defined area; 5) termini (no./mm2), free ends of trabecular network in a defined area; 6) nodes (no./mm2), junction or branch points of trabecular network in a defined area; 7) terminus to node ratio; 8) wall thickness (µm), distance from the cement line to the quiescent cancellous bone surface of the completed bone packet; 9) osteoid volume (%), volume of osteoid to cancellous bone volume; 10) osteoid thickness (µm), mean osteoid thickness; 11) osteoid surface (%), osteoid-covered surface to total cancellous bone surface; 12) eroded surface (%), extent of resorption lacunae to cancellous bone surface; 13) double-labeled surface: dLS (%), extent of double-labeled surface to cancellous bone surface; 14) single-labeled surface: sLS (%), the extent of single-labeled surface to cancellous bone surface; 15) mineralizing surface: MS/BS (%), the extent of labeled (dL + 1/2sL) surface to cancellous bone surface; 16) mineral apposition rate (µm/day), mean distance between double-labeled lines divided by the labeling interval of 14 days; 17) adjusted appositional rate [AjAR = MAR 1 MS/OS (µm/day)], amount of new bone mineralized per day per unit of osteoid-covered surface; 18) bone formation rate: BFR/BS = (MS/BS 1 MAR)/100 (µm3/µm2/day x 10-2), amount of new bone mineralized per day per unit of cancellous bone surface: 19) activation frequency: AcFrq = BFR/W.Th (yr-1), frequency by which new remodeling cycles are initiated at a random location on the cancellous bone surface; 20) formation period: FP = WTh/AjAR (day), time required for an individual remodeling site to complete bone formation; and 21) Active formation period: AcFP = WTh/MAR (days), osteoblast lifespan.

Assessments were confined to the center of the cancellous bone, avoiding the transitional zone. Length measurements were made at x100, and width measurements at x400. Osteoid was measured only when it exceeded 3 µm in thickness. Four equidistant width measurements were taken for osteoid thickness and wall thickness. All resorption cavities (eroded surface) were measured. These were excavations in the bone surface that often had a scalloped contour and were measured regardless of whether they contained cells provided they were 30 µm in length. The measurements were corrected for obliquity of sections and presented in three-dimensional terms. To avoid the interobserver variation in the result, all samples were analyzed independently by one histomorphometrist (S.F.) who was blinded to the patient’s identification, their BMD results, and the time of biopsy with the treatment.

Hormone assay

Serum estradiol and FSH were measured in an automated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using the ES700 kits (Roche Diagnostics Ltd., Lewes, East Sussex, UK). The interassay precision for estradiol was 14.9%, 6.5%, and 8.0% at serum levels of 148 pmol/L, 856 pmol/L, and 2135 pmol/L, respectively. The interassay precision for FSH was 2.9%, 2.7%, and 3.0% at serum levels of 7.6 U/L, 16.7 U/L, and 46.3 U/L, respectively.

BMD

The BMD was measured at the lumbar spine and the proximal femur using a Hologic 1000 QDR DEXA scanner (Hologic, Inc., Waltham, MA). The mean coefficient of variation for the densitometer calculated with the daily use of a spinal phantom was 0.67% during the course of the study. The precision in vivo was assessed by serial scans in 10 healthy premenopausal volunteers both before pretherapy and 6 yr posttherapy BMD measurements. The coefficients of variation were 0.98% and 0.96% at the lumbar spine and 1.21% and 1.17% at the proximal femur, respectively. There were no major repairs or alterations to the DEXA scanner during the 6 yr of the study. BMD results were presented as absolute values (g/cm2) but also as the number of SD and percentages above or below the mean result of young female adults (T score) and age-matched female population (Z score). The T and Z scores enabled assessment of the severity of osteoporosis and degree of improvement with therapy.

Statistical analysis

The majority of bone histomorphometry and DEXA scan variable results were not normally distributed and, thus, presented as median with interquartile range. Similarly, the changes in these variables with therapy were measured as median difference with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and the significance was assessed by Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test. The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to analyze the relation between variables. Multiple regression analysis was performed for those histomorphometric variables that significantly changed with therapy. Pretherapy histomorphometry results and posttherapy serum estradiol levels were used as covariates to assess their individual influence on the posttherapy histomorphometry results. The models were appropriate as the residuals were normally distributed, in all cases except for osteoid volume, where the relationship between variables remained the same even after transformation.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
The results of those 22 women who had satisfactory pre- and posttreatment transcortical iliac crest biopsies after 6 yr of ERT were analyzed. At the beginning of the study their mean age was 65.4 yr (range, 55–76), and the mean interval since menopause was 16.9 yr (range, 10–27). Eighteen (82%) of them were parous with a median parity of 2 (range, 0–6), and none had been on oral contraceptive in the past. The mean height, weight, and BMI before therapy were 1.62 m (range, 1.50–1.76), 65.67 kg (range, 44–89.5), and 25.49 (range, 18.08–33.28), which changed minimally after 6 yr to 1.61 m (range, 1.50–1.76), 66.31 kg (range, 47–84), and 25.76 (range, 19.56–32.09), respectively. Twelve women have had hysterectomies, including four women who also had bilateral oophorectomy, eight women suffered from one or more osteoporotic fractures either at the spine or at the distal radius, and four women had a family history of osteoporosis. The clinical characteristics of those women who stopped ERT or did not have a repeat biopsy were similar to those who completed the study.

Table 1Go summarizes the bone histomorphometric results. The cancellous bone volume showed a significant increase with a median percentage change (95% CI) of 46.9 (12.7–94.3) after 6 yr of ERT. This was accompanied by architectural changes in cancellous bone, which included a significant increase in trabecular thickness and trabecular number, and a decrease in trabecular separation. Assessment of cancellous connectivity showed a significant decrease in the number of termini, but the increase in number of nodes and decrease in terminus to node ratio did not reach statistical significance. The increase in cancellous bone volume was accompanied by a significant increase in wall thickness with a median percentage increase (95% CI) of 18.4 (5.3–28.5). There was a trend toward increase in mineral apposition rate, adjusted appositional rate, and active formation period, but with the small numbers of patients studied, these did not reach statistical significance. Similarly, there was a nonsignificant decrease in the formation period. There was a significant decrease in osteoid volume and osteoid surface without any change in osteoid thickness and increase in eroded surface. In those women whose dose of estradiol implant was reduced to 25 mg 1 yr before biopsy, a similar trend in the results was observed but with a slightly lower degree of change than the rest, who continued on the higher dose (75 mg). The changes in histomorphometric parameters were similar whether or not these three women are included in the analysis. There were no differences in the results between women with intact uteri taking progesterone supplements and hysterectomized women on unopposed ERT.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1. Changes in bone histomorphometry with sc oestradiol replacement therapy for 6 yr

 
At the time of final bone biopsy the mean serum estradiol level was 1077 pmol/L (range, 180-2568), and serum FSH was 3.7 IU/L (range, 1–23.7). Serum estradiol levels in three women on 25-mg estradiol implants were 180, 281, and 287 pmol/L. Serum estradiol levels correlated directly with posttherapy levels of cancellous bone volume (P = 0.002; r = 0.618), trabecular number (P = 0.005; r = 0.574), and wall thickness (P = 0.046; r = 0.475), but inversely with trabecular separation (P = 0.003; r = -0.600), termini (P = 0.018; r = -0.501), and the ratio of terminus to nodes (P = 0.019; r = -0.495). None of the other histomorphometric parameters had a significant correlation with serum estradiol levels. Multiple regression analysis confirmed an independent influence of serum estradiol level on the posttherapy levels of cancellous bone volume, trabecular number, trabecular separation, and termini, without any significant effect of age, interval since menopause, BMI, or pretherapy level of the respective histomorphometric parameters (Table 2Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 2. Multiple regression analysis to identify the independent influence of serum oestradiol levels on the changes in bone histomorphometric parameters after 6 yr of sc oestradiol replacement

 
Neither age nor the interval since menopause correlated with any histomorphometric parameters either before or after therapy. Similarly, height, weight, and BMI had no relationship with pre- or posttherapy histomorphometric results. However, the changes in all structural and static parameters correlated inversely with their respective pretherapy results: cancellous bone volume (P = 0.005; r = -0.577), trabecular thickness (P = 0.002; r = -0.618), trabecular number (P < 0.001; r = -0.703), trabecular separation (P < 0.001; r = -0.801), termini (P < 0.001; r = -0.777), nodes (P = 0.004; r = -0.583), osteoid volume (P < 0.001; r = -0.775), osteoid thickness (P = 0.006; r = -0.605), osteoid surface (P = 0.002; r = -0.620), eroded surface (P = 0.001; r = -0.653), and wall thickness (P < 0.001; r = -0.763).

The BMD showed a significant improvement in every woman both at the lumbar spine and proximal femur. The median percentage rise at the lumbar spine was 31.4 (95% CI, 17.2–40.9), and that at the proximal femur was 15.1 (95% CI, 9.6–23.6). Both T and Z scores improved from osteoporotic levels before therapy to normal levels 6 yr after therapy (Table 3Go). The increase in BMD at both sites correlated directly with the changes in cancellous bone volume (lumbar spine: P = 0.02, r = 0.492; proximal femur: P = 0.041, r = 0.438), but not with any other histomorphometric parameter.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 3. Changes in BMD, T score, and Z score with sc oestradiol replacement therapy for 6 yr

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
This is the first longitudinal study providing histomorphometric evidence for an increase in cancellous bone volume, confirming the anabolic effect of ERT on human skeleton. Such a large rise cannot be explained by the expected mode of E2 action in reducing the bone turnover and remodeling space, which occupies only 6–8% of bone volume (23, 24). The increase in wall thickness indicates increased filling of the bone remodeling unit and provides evidence for an anabolic effect of ERT due to increased bone formation at a cellular level. The accompanying improvement in cancellous structure and connectivity also suggests possible improvement of the architectural changes associated with osteoporosis.

The bone loss associated with E2 deficiency is generally attributed to increased bone resorption and increased bone turnover. These processes are particularly striking in primary hyperparathyroidism, but cancellous bone is actually better preserved and increased bone volume is not uncommonly observed (25). This is because, under normal circumstances, bone formation is coupled to bone resorption and bone balance is maintained. Therefore, defective bone formation must contribute to the mechanism by which E2 deficiency bone loss occurs. A decrease in wall thickness has been observed in postmenopausal osteoporosis (26, 27). Unlike the lack of positive effect of short-term or oral ERT on wall thickness, we found that 6 yr of sc E2 implants increased wall thickness. Similar findings have recently been reported in a cross-sectional study of postmenopausal women on long-term E2 implant therapy (17). We did not measure resorption depth in this group of patients; there is no agreed method of measurement for this parameter (20, 28, 29, 30), and widely different values have been found in humans. Nevertheless, the increased wall thickness represents net bone gain at individual bone remodeling units.

This increased bone formation at a cellular level may be due to increased numbers of osteoblasts recruited to individual bone remodeling sites, increased activity or vigor of individual osteoblasts, and/or increased active lifespan of osteoblasts. The trend toward an increase in adjusted appositional rate suggests that increased activity of osteoblasts may contribute to increased bone formation and mineralization. The tendency to an increase in active formation period and a decrease in formation period suggests that the osteoblast also spends a greater proportion of its life span in an active state. A cellular mechanism for increased osteoblast life span and activity may be reduced apoptosis by E2 (31, 32). Although these effects are likely to be mediated through the estrogen receptor that is present on osteoblasts and osteocytes (33, 34), we cannot exclude the possibility that the anabolic effect may be due to activation of the androgen receptor by the relatively high doses of estrogen (35). Unfortunately, the small numbers of women studied did not confer sufficient statistical power for significance. Sample sizes of 30 and 1000 would have been required to establish a difference of 50% with a power of 80% and probability of 5% for the adjusted appositional rate and active formation period, respectively. Nevertheless, the net increase in wall thickness and cancellous bone volume strongly implicates these mechanisms, which may be substantiated in larger studies. The lack of increase in labeled bone surface and of the calculated bone formation rate reflect the suppression of bone turnover, well-recognized with E2 therapy, and, therefore, does not negate the stimulatory action that E2 may also exert on osteoblasts.

In many of these patients, the posttreatment biopsy was taken from the ipsilateral iliac crest 6 yr after the pretreatment biopsy. This time interval was chosen to allow a sufficient length of time for most of the wall packets measured to be formed under the influence of estrogen treatment. It was also considered that the 6-yr interval would minimize or obviate the effect of a regional acceleratory phenomenon or repair of a bony defect. The lack of increase of labeled bone surface or woven bone lends support to this.

Physiological and supraphysiological doses of ERT have been shown to stimulate osteoblastic recruitment, leading to increased cancellous bone volume in animal models (4, 5, 36). There is also in vitro evidence that estradiol may stimulate osteoblast differentiation and function (2, 3). The standard dose of ERT commonly used results in relatively low serum estradiol levels, only reaching that of early or mid follicular range of a normal menstrual cycle (37). This may be sufficient to suppress bone resorption but is inadequate to stimulate bone formation and, therefore, merely serves to prevent bone loss. However, the sc route used in our study ensures complete compliance and enables a much higher estradiol level to be achieved, similar to those in the mid-luteal phase, and a more physiological estradiol to estrone ratio by avoiding the hepatic first-pass effect. All patients, except those who reduced the dose of estradiol implant, had serum estradiol levels in the mid-luteal range (450 pmol/L) or above. Although the dose of E2 used was high, the side effects and dropout rate was similar to that of conventional hormone replacement therapy. The side effects of ERT, such as mastalgia and headaches, settled spontaneously in those who continued it long term. In those women with heavy withdrawal bleeding a reduction in dose solved the problem, and annual endometrial biopsies did not show hyperplasia or malignancy. However, the same dose resulted in a wide range of serum estradiol levels (15, 38), indicating a variation in the pharmacodynamics and possible cumulative effect after long-term use, which may explain differences in the skeletal response.

Previous longitudinal studies on the effect of ERT in postmenopausal women with osteopenia or osteoporosis have failed to show an anabolic effect on bone within 2 yr. All except one study used oral or transdermal ERT, which results in a lower serum estradiol level and is less effective in improving BMD (9, 10, 11, 12). The results of our current study and a recent cross-sectional study using similar sc E2 implants (17) suggest that E2 levels in the higher end of the physiological range are required for the anabolic effect of E2. Some of our patients had supraphysiological levels of E2 after 6 yr of ERT. High doses of E2 in mice and birds are known to cause a dramatic increase in bone volume (39). Although some of the new bone formation is appositional, E2 also induces de novo bone formation in these species (39). Despite absence of woven bone in any of the iliac bone biopsies, we cannot exclude the possibility that de novo new bone formation may have contributed to the substantial increase in bone volume observed in these women. The striking increase in cancellous bone volume, trabecular thickness, and connectivity is difficult to attribute to increased wall thickness alone. De novo lamellar bone formation on preexisting quiescent bone surface has been described with PTH treatment (40). Estrogen has been shown to induce osteoblast progenitors in bone marrow and lead to medullary bone formation in mice (41). Although this has not been demonstrated under physiological circumstances in humans, we cannot exclude this as a mechanism whereby high dose E2 causes new bone formation.

The increase in cancellous bone volume and wall thickness are related to estradiol levels. It is unlikely that progesterone on its own stimulated bone formation or had a synergistic effect with estrogen, because women on these supplements did not show increased bone volume or wall thickness compared with those on estrogen alone. There is currently no evidence that progesterone at the doses commonly used with hormone replacement therapy exerts an anabolic effect on bone (42). Whether long-term use of E2 is also required for the anabolic effect is unclear. It was estimated that 6 yr is required for a new steady state to be achieved, whereby nearly all bone packets measured would have been formed under the influence of E2 replacement. It would also be of interest to know if the increase in bone volume and improvement in cancellous connectivity results in increase in mechanical strength and a reduced risk of osteoporotic fractures. The lack of height loss in these women after 6 yr is encouraging, but larger studies are required for confirmation.

The pretreatment bone volume, cancellous structure and connectivity, and wall thickness results in this study are similar to published reports on postmenopausal osteoporosis (26, 27), but after 6 yr of ERT the results were similar to those in normal postmenopausal women (43). Because these parameters are expected to decline with age (44, 45, 46, 47), the positive changes shown in this study over a period of 6 yr suggests that ERT is capable of reversing the bone loss and disruption of bone architecture. The increase in cancellous bone volume is paralleled by the substantial rise in BMD, which exceeds that reported for long-term oral ERT (48, 49, 50, 51).

Unlike other studies, and our own experience with 1 yr ERT (9, 10, 11), we did not find suppression in activation frequency despite a decrease in osteoid surface. This may reflect increased activation of new bone-forming sites with long-term sc E2 after the initial suppression of bone resorption and turnover by E2. The increase in eroded surface was an unexpected finding. This may be due to mild secondary hyperparathyroidism, sometimes observed in the elderly, since these women were not on calcium supplements, or alternatively may be due to observer variation, recognized to be problematic in assessment of eroded surface.

In conclusion, we have shown that 6 yr of treatment of osteoporotic postmenopausal women with estradiol implants that produce serum estradiol levels in the mid-luteal range cause a substantial increase in bone mass, measured by bone densitometry and bone histomorphometry. One of the main drawbacks of this study is the lack of control subjects. Nevertheless, the evidence that we present in our longitudinal study, together with similar findings in a crosssectional study of women on long-term estradiol implants (17) demonstrate that E2 is capable of exerting an anabolic effect in the human skeleton. The resultant substantial increase in bone volume and restoration of cancellous bone connectivity has important implications for the role of E2 in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.


   Footnotes
 
Address requests for reprints to: Dr. J. W. W. Studd, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Road, London SW10 9NH, United Kingdom.

1 Jointly funded by research grants from Birthright/WellBeing (Research Charity of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists); Remedi (Rehabilitation and Medical Trust), and Charing Cross and Westminster Medical School Trustees. Back

2 Supported by a WellBeing Research Fellowship. Back

Received February 25, 2000.

Revised May 31, 2000.

Revised July 17, 2000.

Accepted October 18, 2000.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. World Health Organization. 1994 Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Geneva: WHO.
  2. Ernst M, Schmid C, Froesch ER. 1988 Enhanced osteoblast proliferation and collagen gene expression by estradiol. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 85:2307–2310.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Komm BS, Terpening CM, Benz DJ, et al. 1988 Estrogenic binding, receptor mRNA, and biologic response in osteoblast-like osteosarcoma cells. Science. 241:81–84.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Takano-Yamamoto T, Rodan GA. 1990 Direct effects of 17ß-estradiol on trabecular bone in ovariectomised rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 87:2172–2176.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Chow JWM, Lean JM, Chambers TJ. 1992 17ß-estradiol stimulates cancellous bone formation in female rats. Endocrinology. 130:3025–3032.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Morishima A, Grumbach MM, Simpson ER, Fisher C, Qin K. 1995 Aromatase deficiency in male and female siblings caused by a novel mutation and the physiological role of estrogens. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 80:3689–3698.[Abstract]
  7. Smith EP, Boyd J, Frank GR, et al. 1994 Estrogen resistance caused by a mutation in the estrogen-receptor gene in a man. N Engl J Med. 331:1056–1061.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Hannon R, Blumsohn A, Naylor K, Eastell R. 1998 Response of biochemical markers of bone turnover to hormone replacement therapy: impact of biological variability. J Bone Miner Res. 13:1124–1133.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Steiniche T, Hasling C, Charles P, Eriksen EF, Mosekilde L, Melsen F. 1989 A randomized study on the effects of estrogen/gestagen or high dose oral calcium on trabecular bone remodeling in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Bone. 10:313–320.[Medline]
  10. Holland EFN, Chow JWM, Studd JWW, Leather AT, Chambers TJ. 1994 Histomorphometric changes in the skeleton of postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density treated with percutaneous estradiol implants. Obstet Gynecol. 83:387–391.[Medline]
  11. Vedi S, Compston JE. 1996 The effects of long-term hormone replacement therapy on bone remodeling in postmenopausal women. Bone. 19:535–539.[Medline]
  12. Lufkin EG, Wahner HW, O’Fallon WM, et al. 1992 Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis with transdermal estrogen. Ann Intern Med. 117:1–9.
  13. Studd JWW, Savvas M, Watson N, Fogelman J, Cooper D. 1990 The relationship between plasma oestradiol and increased bone density in postmenopausal women after treatment with subcutaneous hormone implants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 163:1474–1479.[Medline]
  14. Garnett T, Studd J, Watson N, Savvas M. 1991 A cross-sectional study of the effects of long-term percutaneous hormone replacement therapy on bone density. Obstet Gynecol. 78:1002–1007.[Medline]
  15. Studd JWW, Holland EFN, Leather AT, Smith RNJ. 1994 The dose response of percutaneous oestradiol implants on the skeletons of postmenopausal women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 101:787–791.[Medline]
  16. Wahab M, Ballard P, Purdie DW, Cooper A, Willson JC. 1997 The effect of long term oestradiol implantation on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women who have undergone hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 104:728–731.[Medline]
  17. Vedi S, Purdie DW, Ballard P, Board S, Cooper AC, Compston JE. 1999 Bone remodeling and structure in postmenopausal women treated with long-term, high-dose estrogen therapy. Osteoporosis Int. 10:52–58.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Parfitt AM. 1984 The cellular basis of bone remodeling: the quantum concept reexamined in light of recent advances in the cell biology of bone. Calcif Tissue Int. 36(Suppl):S37–S45.
  19. Eriksen EF. 1986 Normal and pathological remodeling of human trabecular bone: three-dimensional reconstruction of the remodeling sequence in normals and in metabolic bone disease. Endocr Rev. 7:379–408.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Parfitt AM, Drezner MK, Glorieux FH, et al. 1987 Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature, symbols and units. Report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee. J Bone Miner Res. 2:595–610.[Medline]
  21. Mellish RWE, Ferguson-Pell MW, Cochran GVB, Lindsay R, Dempster DW. 1991 A new manual method for assessing two-dimensional cancellous bone structure: comparison between iliac crest and lumbar vertebra. J Bone Miner Res. 6:689–696.[Medline]
  22. Parfitt AM, Matthews CHE, Villeneuve AR, Kleerekoper M. 1983 Relationships between surface, volume and thickness of iliac trabecular bone in aging and in osteoporosis. J Clin Invest. 72:1396–1409.
  23. Parfitt AM. 1983 The physiological and clinical significance of bone histomorphometric data. In: Recker RR, ed. Bone histomorphometry: techniques and interpretation. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 143–223.
  24. Heaney RP. 1994 The bone-remodeling transient: implications for the interpretation of clinical studies of bone mass change. J Bone Miner Res. 9:1515–1523.[Medline]
  25. Parisien M, Silverberg SJ, Shane E, et al. 1990 The histomorphometry of bone in primary hyperparathyroidism: preseveration of cancellous bone structure. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 70:930–938.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Eriksen EF, Hodgson SF, Eastell R, Cedel SL, O’Fallon WM, Riggs BL. 1990 Cancellous bone remodeling in type I (postmenopausal) osteoporosis: quantitative assessment of rates of formation, resorption, and bone loss at tissue and cellular levels. J Bone Miner Res. 5:311–319.[Medline]
  27. Kimmel DB, Recker RR, Gallagher JC, Vaswani AS, Aloia JF. 1990 A comparison of iliac bone histomorphometric data in postmenopausal osteoporotic and normal subjects. Bone Miner. 11:217–235.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Eriksen EF, Melsen F, Mosekilde L. 1984 Reconstruction of the resorptive site in iliac trabecular bone: a kinetic model of bone resorption in 20 normal individuals. Metab Bone Dis Relat Res. 5:235–242.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Cohen-Solal ME, Shih M-S, Lundy MW, Parfitt AM. 1991 A new method for measuring cancellous bone erosion depth: application to the cellular mechanisms of bone loss in postmenopausal osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 6:1331–1338.[Medline]
  30. Garrahan NJ, Croucher PI, Compston JE. 1990 A computerised technique for the quantitative assessment of resorption cavities in trabecular bone. Bone. 11:241–245.[Medline]
  31. Tomkinson A, Gevers EF, Wit JM, Reeve J, Noble BS. 1998 The role of estrogen in the control of rat osteocyte apoptosis. J Bone Miner Res. 13:1243–1250.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Spyridopoulos I, Sullivan AB, Kearney M, Isner JM, Losordo DW. 1997 Estrogen receptor mediated inhibition of human endothelial cell apoptosis: estradiol as a survival factor. Circulation. 95:1505–1514.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Eriksen EF, Colvard DS, Berg NJ, et al. 1988 Evidence of estrogen receptors in normal human osteoblast-like cells. Science. 241:84–86.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Braidman IP, Davenport JK, Carter DH, Selby PL, Mawer EB, Freemont AJ. 1995 Preliminary in situ identification of estrogen target cells in bone. J Bone Miner Res. 10:74–80.[Medline]
  35. Luthy I, Begin D, Labrie F. 1998 Mediation by the androgen receptor of the stimulatory and anti-androgenic actions of 17ß-estradiol on the growth of androgen-sensitive Shionogi mammary carcinoma cells in culture. Endocrinology. 123:1418–1424.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Chow J, Tobias JH, Colston KW, Chambers TJ. 1992 Estrogen maintains trabecular bone volume in rats not only by suppression of bone resorption but also by stimulation of bone formation. J Clin Invest. 89:74–78.
  37. Jasonni VM, Bulletti C, Naldi S, et al. 1988 Biological and endocrine aspects of transdermal 17ß oestradiol administration in postmenopausal women. Maturitas. 10:425–432.
  38. Nassen T, Persson I, Thor L, Mallmin H, Ljunghall S, Bergstrom R. 1993 Maintained bone density at advanced ages after long term treatment with low dose oestradiol implants. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 100:454–459.[Medline]
  39. Bain SD, Bailey MC, Celino DL, Lantry MM, Edwards MW. 1993 High-dose estrogen inhibits bone resorption and stimulates bone formation in the ovariectomised mouse. J Bone Miner Res. 8:435–442.[Medline]
  40. Hodsman AB, Steer BM. 1993 Early histomorphometric changes in response to parathyroid hormone therapy in osteoporosis: evidence for de novo bone formation on quiescent cancellous surfaces. Bone. 14:523–527.[Medline]
  41. Samuels A, Perry MJ, Tobias JH. 1999 High-dose estrogen induces medullary bone formation in female mice. J Bone Miner Res. 14:178–186.[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Lindsay R. 1999 The lack of effect of progestogen on bone. J Reprod Med. 44:215–220.[Medline]
  43. Recker RR, Kimmel DB, Parfitt AM, Davies KM, Keshawarz N, Hinders S. 1988 Static and tetracycline based bone histomorphometric data from 34 normal postmenopausal females. J Bone Miner Res. 3:133–144.[Medline]
  44. Elias C, Heaney RP, Recker RR. 1985 Placebo therapy for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int. 37:6–13.[Medline]
  45. Mosekilde L. 1989 Sex differences in age-related loss of vertebral trabecular bone mass and structure-biomechanical consequences. Bone. 10:425–432.[Medline]
  46. Lips P, Courpron P, Meunier PJ. 1978 Mean wall thickness of trabecular bone packets in the human iliac crest: changes with age. Calcif Tissue Res. 26:13–17.[CrossRef][Medline]
  47. Darby AJ, Meunier PJ. 1981 Mean wall thickness and formation periods of trabecular bone packets in idiopathic osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int. 33:199–204.[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. Nielsen SP, Barenholdt O, Hermansen F, Munk-Jensen N. 1994 Magnitude and pattern of skeletal response to long term continuous and cyclical sequential oestrogen/progestin treatment. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 101:319–324.[Medline]
  49. Schneider DL, Barrett-Connor L, Morton DJ. 1997 Timing of postmenopausal estrogen for optimum bone mineral density. The Rancho Bernardo Study. J Am Med Assn. 277:543–547.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Felson DT, Zhang Y, Hannon MT, Kiel DP, Wilson PWF, Anderson JJ. 1993 The effect of post-menopausal oestrogen therapy on bone density in elderly women. N Engl J Med. 329:2–9.
  51. Eiken P, Pors Nielsen S, Kolthoff N. 1997 Effects on bone mass after eight years of hormonal replacement therapy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 104:702–707.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Menopause IntHome page
J Calleja-Agius, Y Muscat-Baron, and M P Brincat
Estrogens and the intervertebral disc
Menopause Int, September 1, 2009; 15(3): 127 - 130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
U. I. Modder, D. G. Monroe, D. G. Fraser, T. C. Spelsberg, C. J. Rosen, M. Gehin, P. Chambon, B. W. O'Malley, and S. Khosla
Skeletal Consequences of Deletion of Steroid Receptor Coactivator-2/Transcription Intermediary Factor-2
J. Biol. Chem., July 10, 2009; 284(28): 18767 - 18777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J EndocrinolHome page
J. Enriquez, A. E. Lemus, J. Chimal-Monroy, H. Arzate, G. A Garcia, B. Herrero, F. Larrea, and G. Perez-Palacios
The effects of synthetic 19-norprogestins on osteoblastic cell function are mediated by their non-phenolic reduced metabolites
J. Endocrinol., June 1, 2007; 193(3): 493 - 504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
P. Y. Liu, K. A. Hoey, K. L. Mielke, J. D. Veldhuis, and S. Khosla
A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Short-Term Graded Transdermal Estradiol in Healthy Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist-Suppressed Pre- and Postmenopausal Women: Effects on Serum Markers of Bone Turnover, Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I, and Osteoclastogenic Mediators
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2005; 90(4): 1953 - 1960.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 EndocrinologyHome page
M. J. Perry, S. Gujra, T. Whitworth, and J. H. Tobias
Tamoxifen Stimulates Cancellous Bone Formation in Long Bones of Female Mice
Endocrinology, March 1, 2005; 146(3): 1060 - 1065.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. Meier, P. Y. Liu, L. P. Ly, J. de Winter-Modzelewski, M. Jimenez, D. J. Handelsman, and M. J. Seibel
Recombinant Human Chorionic Gonadotropin But Not Dihydrotestosterone Alone Stimulates Osteoblastic Collagen Synthesis in Older Men with Partial Age-Related Androgen Deficiency
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2004; 89(6): 3033 - 3041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 EndocrinologyHome page
K. E. McDougall, M. J. Perry, R. L. Gibson, S. M. Colley, K. S. Korach, and J. H. Tobias
Estrogen Receptor-{alpha} Dependency of Estrogen's Stimulatory Action on Cancellous Bone Formation in Male Mice
Endocrinology, May 1, 2003; 144(5): 1994 - 1999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
K. E. McDougall, M. J. Perry, R. L. Gibson, J. M. Bright, S. M. Colley, J. B. Hodgin, O. Smithies, and J. H. Tobias
Estrogen-induced osteogenesis in intact female mice lacking ERbeta
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, October 1, 2002; 283(4): E817 - E823.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Endocr. Rev.Home page
B. L. Riggs, S. Khosla, and L. J. Melton III
Sex Steroids and the Construction and Conservation of the Adult Skeleton
Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2002; 23(3): 279 - 302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khastgir, G.
Right arrow Articles by Chow, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Khastgir, G.
Right arrow Articles by Chow, J.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals