help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM ENDO 08
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wallace, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Strasburger, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wallace, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Strasburger, C. J.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 86, No. 1 200-206
Copyright © 2001 by The Endocrine Society


Original Studies

The Response of Molecular Isoforms of Growth Hormone to Acute Exercise in Trained Adult Males1

Jennifer D. Wallace, Ross C. Cuneo, Martin Bidlingmaier, Per Arne Lundberg, Lena Carlsson, Cesar Luiz Boguszewski, John Hay, Marie-Louise Healy, Raffaele Napoli, Rolf Dall, Thord Rosén and Christian J. Strasburger

Metabolic Research Unit, Department of Medicine, and Statistics Section, Department of Social and Preventative Medicine, University of Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hospital (J.D.W., R.C.C., J.H.), 4102 Brisbane, Australia; Neuroendocrine Unit, Department of Medicine, Innenstadt University Hospital (M.B., C.J.S.), 80336 Munich, Germany; SEMPR, Serviço do Endocrinologia e Metabologia do Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade Federal do Paraná (C.L.B.), 80060-240 Curitiba, Brazil; Research Center for Endocrinology and Metabolism, Sahlgrenska Hospital (P.A.L., L.C., T.R.), S-413 45 Gothenberg, Sweden; Department of Endocrinology, St. Thomas’s Hospital (M.-L.H.), London, United Kingdom SE1 7EH; Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Sciences, Frederico II University (R.N.), 80131 Naples, Italy; and Department of Medicine M (Endocrinology and Diabetes), Aarhus University Hospital (R.D.), 8000 Aarhus, Denmark

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Jennifer D. Wallace, Metabolic Research Unit, University of Queensland, Department of Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 4102 Brisbane, Australia. E-mail: jwallace{at}medicine.pa.uq.edu.au


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Circulating GH consists of multiple molecular isoforms, all derived from the one gene in nonpregnant humans. To assess the effect of a potent stimulus to pituitary secretion on GH isoforms, we studied 17 aerobically trained males (age, 26.9 ± 1.5 yr) in a randomized, repeat measures study of rest vs. exercise. Exercise consisted of continuous cycle ergometry at approximately 80% of predetermined maximal oxygen uptake for 20 min. Serum was assayed for total, pituitary, 22-kDa, recombinant, non-22-kDa, 20-kDa, and immunofunctional GH. All isoforms increased during, peaked at the end, and declined after exercise. At peak exercise, 22-kDa GH was the predominant isoform. After exercise, the ratios of non-22 kDa/total GH and 20-kDa GH/total GH increased and those of recombinant/pituitary GH decreased. The disappearance half-times for pituitary GH and 20-kDa GH were significantly longer than those for all other isoforms. We conclude that 1) all molecular isoforms of GH measured increased with and peaked at the end of acute exercise, with 22-kDa GH constituting the major isoform in serum during exercise; and 2) the proportion of non-22-kDa isoforms increased after exercise due in part to slower disappearance rates of 20-kDa and perhaps other non-22-kDa GH isoforms. It remains to be determined whether the various biological actions of different GH isoforms impact on postexercise homeostasis.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE HETEROGENEITY of circulating GH has been recognized since the early 1970s (1). All circulating isoforms of GH in nonpregnant human adults are derived from the GH-N gene on chromosome 17. The main circulating isoform is thought to be the 1- to 191-amino acid 22-kDa GH. Alternative splicing of exon 3 contributes a smaller, but significant, proportion of circulating GH as a 176-amino acid 20-kDa isoform, missing residues 32–46. Residues 1–43 and 44–191 comprise 5- and 17-kDa fragments, respectively, but other monomeric, dimeric, protein-bound, and chemically altered molecular isoforms have also been identified (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7).

Signal transduction conventionally follows two-site binding of the GH ligand and membrane-bound receptor dimerization. Intact 22-kDa GH possesses both receptor-binding sites and has been shown to exert growth-promoting, anabolic, lipolytic, and multiple effects on carbohydrate metabolism in humans (6, 8). Twenty-kilodalton GH, which has altered receptor binding site 1 conformation, was initially thought to be biologically inert (9), but recent studies have shown receptor binding and agonistic actions comparable to those of 22-kDa GH (10, 11). A variety of actions have been shown with other non-22-kDa GH isoforms (2, 12, 13, 14), raising the possibility of signaling mechanisms other than via the GH receptor (15).

Serum GH concentrations increase dramatically in response to acute exercise, with the response depending on the nature, duration, and relative workload of the exercise and the age, gender, and nutritional and training status of the individual (16). There are limited data on the response of isoforms other than 22-kDa GH to acute exercise (17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22). GH may be important in homeostasis during or after exercise (16), but until the response of the major molecular isoforms to exercise has been fully characterized, the contribution of differing isoforms to this process cannot be further explored.

Recombinant DNA technology has provided ample supplies of synthetic GH, permitting athletes to illegally administer GH in attempts to enhance sporting performance. Detection of exogenous GH administration may be possible by assessing alterations in the ratios of endogenous GH isoforms (23). To investigate this strategy it is first necessary to characterize the response of GH isoforms to acute exercise. To explore both the question of metabolic homeostasis and GH dope detection, we aimed to characterize the GH isoform responses to acute exercise in trained athletic males using a variety of established and novel assays.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subject selection

Selection criteria included: male gender, age between 18–40 yr , high level of habitual aerobic activity defined as at least four 30-min sessions of continuous aerobic type exercise per week, high aerobic fitness defined as maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) greater than 45 mL/kg·min, and no illnesses or medications known to impair exercise or to alter endocrine function.

Screening

A full physical examination was performed, and blood was taken for routine biochemistry, hematology, and serum testosterone, T4, and T3 determinations. Urine samples were tested to exclude glycosuria. Skinfold thicknesses were measured with a Harpenden caliper at standard sites (biceps, triceps, subscapular, abdominal, and suprailiac), and the percent body fat was calculated (24). VO2max was measured by cycle ergometry (Lode Excalibur Sport, Grunningen, Holland) and respiratory gas analysis (Medical Graphics CPX-D Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing System, Medical Graphics, Birmingham, UK) as previously described (25, 26).

Study design

All subjects provided informed consent for studies approved by Guy’s and St. Thomas’s Hospital’s ethics committee (London, UK). Subjects underwent both rest (Rest) and exercise (Ex) studies, separated by 48 h, with random assignment of the sequence (Fig. 1Go). Subjects were semirecumbent from -60 until just before 0 min, were upright from 0–30 min (chair sitting for Rest study and upright cycle ergometer for Ex study), and were semirecumbent from 30–120 min. Exercise on a cycle ergometer included two 5-min warm-up stages at 1 and 2 watts/kg and 20 min at 65% of the workload achieved at VO2max (corresponding to ~80% VO2max). Blood samples were taken at intervals from -30 to 120 min. Subjects drank 250 mL water immediately after exercise and again at 60 min to replace predicted sweat loss. During the Rest study, chair-sitting subjects were given 50 mL water at these two times to ensure uniformity of fluid ingestion.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Study protocol. Subjects (n = 17) were randomly assigned to undergo both Rest and Ex studies separated by 48 h. Subjects were semirecumbent from -30 to 0 min, were upright from 0–30 min, and were semirecumbent from 30–120 min. Exercise on a cycle ergometer included a 10-min two-stage warm-up and 20 min at 65% of the workload at VO2max (equivalent to approximately 80% VO2max).

 
Assays

Total serum GH (total GH) was assayed using a polyclonal immunoradiometric assay (Pharmacia & Upjohn, Inc., Uppsala, Sweden). The pituitary-derived GH standards provided in the immunoradiometric assay were calibrated against the First International Reference Preparation from WHO (IRP 80/505), in which 1 mg = 2.6 IU GH. The manufacturer specified that the assay had 100% cross-reactivity with 22-kDa, deamidated 22-kDa, dimeric 22-kDa, and 20-kDa GH isoforms. The within-assay coefficients of variation (CVs) were 10%, less than 5.0%, and less than 5.0%, and the between-assay CVs were 9.0%, less than 5.0%, and 7.0% at 10, 23, and 43 mU/L, respectively. The detection limit was 0.4 mU/L.

The 22-kDa GH was measured by a two-site, monoclonal antibody, time-resolved fluroimmunoassay (Delphia hGH assay, Wallac, Inc. Oy, Turku, Finland). The standard was biosynthetic rhGH calibrated against IRP 80/505. Cross-reactivity with 20-kDa GH was less than 0.001%. The intraassay CVs were 5.0%, 3.9%, 3.4%, 2.1%, and 4.1% at 0.6, 12.2, 21.5, 34.1, and 89.3 mU/L, respectively. Interassay CVs were 6.3%, 3.7%, 5.3%, 5.4%, and 4.2% at 0.05, 0.34, 1.14, 2.26, and 3.78 mU/L, respectively. The detection limit was 0.03 mU/L.

Non-22-kDa GH was measured with the 22-kDa GH exclusion assay (22-kDa GHEA) as previously described (27). The 22-kDa GH monomers and dimers were removed from serum with a specific monoclonal antibody (MCB) and magnetic beads. Non-22-kDa isoforms, including mostly 20-kDa GH and a small fraction of other monomers and fragments of GH, were detected by assaying the stripped serum with a polyclonal antibody GH immunoradiometric assay (identical to the total GH assay). The intra- and interassay CVs were less than 9% at concentrations between 82.2–94.6 mU/L, and 17% and 21.6% at concentrations of 19.2 and 20.8 mU/L, respectively. The detection limit was 0.05 mU/L.

"Pituitary" GH (Pit-GH) and "recombinant" or 22-kDa GH (rhGH) were assayed simultaneously in two sandwich-type immunoassays. The Pit-GH assay was based on mAb 1H6 and biotinylated mAb 10A7 and was permissive in recognizing preferentially pituitary GH consisting of a wide variety of molecular isoforms, including 22-kDa, 20-kDa, acidic, fragmented, and modified forms of GH. The rhGH assay used mAb 5D7 and biotinylated mAb 10A7 and preferentially recognized recombinant 22-kDa GH (23). These assays were developed to optimally recognize pituitary (IRP 80/505) and recombinant (IRP 88/624) GH, respectively. The standard for each assay was IRP 80/505. The assays were highly reproducible (intraassay CV, <5%; interassay CV, <6%). The intraassay CV for the ratio of rhGH/Pit-GH was 4.8%. The detection limits were 0.13 and 0.05 mU/L, respectively.

The 20-kDa GH was assayed with antibodies provided by Mitsui Pharmaceuticals (Tokyo, Japan) (28), with modifications. The method involved monoclonal antibody D05 and biotinylated mAb 7D5 in a solid phase fluorometric sandwich assay. The within- and between-assay CVs were 4.2% and 6.1%, respectively. The cross-reactivity with 22-kDa GH was less than 0.1%. The lower detection limit was 0.13 mU/L.

The immunofunctional GH assay (GH-IFA) detects GH isoforms possessing both receptor-binding sites, i.e. those capable of biological signaling via GH receptor dimerization (29). The method used an anti-hGH monoclonal antibody directed against binding site 2 of hGH to capture and immobilize GH from the serum. Biotin-labeled recombinant human GH-binding protein in a second incubation step formed a complex with those hGH molecular isoforms also possessing binding site 1. The signal was detected after a short third incubation step with labeled streptavidin. Cross-reactivity with 20-kDa GH was approximately 11% (Mitsui preparation). The within-assay CVs were 8.5%, 7.3%, and 6.1%, and the between-assay CVs were 12.8%, 9.4%, and 7.9%, at 1.1, 13.8, and 49.9 mU/L, respectively. The detection limit was 0.3 mU/L.

Statistics

Effects of exercise were assessed by split-plot, repeat measures ANOVA using a general linear model (SPSS 7.5 for Windows, SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL), with within-subject factors being condition (Rest vs. Ex) and time point, and the between-subject factor being study order (whether subjects were studied under the Rest or Ex condition first). The relative proportions of GH isoforms were calculated at each time point, providing both analytes were above (not at) the assay detection limit; spurious ratios were deleted where values were statistical outliers. Differences between Rest and Ex conditions for 22-kDa GH/total GH, rhGH/Pit-GH, and 20-kDa GH/total GH ratios were analyzed using ANOVA, treating each time point as a discrete variable, as repeat measures ANOVA was not possible under these conditions of incomplete datasets due to the number of individual assays at or below the detection limit of the assay. Disappearance half-times were calculated from exponential curve fitting to the individual data after peak values were achieved. A one-way ANOVA was used to assess differences in disappearance half-times, with post-hoc t testing to ascribe individual distinctions. Simple linear regression analysis was used to assess relationships between variables. Results were reported as the mean ± SEM. Assays measured in mass units were converted to Systeme International units (1 mg = 2.6 U).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
As previously reported (25, 26), the characteristics of the 17 male subjects included: age, 26.9 ± 1.5 yr; height, 176.9 ± 1.1 cm; weight, 73.9 ± 2.2 kg; body mass index, 23.6 ± 0.6 kg/m2; percent fat mass, 17.3 ± 1.1; waist/hip ratio, 0.84 ± 0.02; and VO2max, 4.09 ± 0.09 L/min or 56.±1.2 mL/min·kg.

In response to acute exercise, the absolute concentrations of GH measured by each assay increased (Fig. 2Go and Table 1Go). Concentrations were low and stable on the Rest day. Statistically, the condition x time point interaction showed a difference from Rest for all analytes (P < 0.0001 for each assay), but no order effect. Peak concentrations occurred at the end of the 30-min exercise bout for all analytes. The 20-kDa GH showed a broader peak, which extended to 15 min after the end of exercise.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. The response of molecular isoforms of GH to acute endurance-type exercise. For Rest data, see Table 1Go. Data are the mean ± SEM.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Changes in serum concentrations of GH molecular isoforms in response to rest and exercise (Ex)

 
Changes in the relative proportion of selected isoforms in response to acute exercise are shown in Fig. 3Go and Table 2Go. Each ratio was stable during the Rest study. On cessation of exercise, the ratio of non-22-kDa GH/total GH continued to increase, peaking 15 min after exercise and declining slowly thereafter (P < 0.0001 for condition x time point interaction; difference between end of exercise and +15 min, P < 0.002). A similar postexercise increase in the ratio of 20-kDa GH/total GH was observed. The ratio of rhGH/Pit-GH increased at the end of exercise (i.e. an increase in the relative proportion of 22 kDa), followed by a progressive fall to levels below that recorded before exercise (P = 0.024, Rest vs. Ex at 120 min). No change was observed in the ratio of 22-kDa GH/total GH.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. The changes in relative proportions of GH molecular isoforms in response to rest and exercise. Ex data are shown in solid lines and closed symbols, Rest data are shown in dotted lines and open symbols. A, Non-22-kDa GH/total GH; B, 20-kDa GH/total GH; C, rhGH/Pit-GH; and D, 22-kDa GH/total GH.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Changes in relative proportions of GH molecular isoforms in response to rest and exercise (Ex)

 
Figure 4Go shows the relationship between total GH and non-22-kDa GH as a percentage of total GH for all paired samples in both Rest and Ex studies. Considerable variability in the proportion of non-22-kDa GH/total GH is seen at low total GH concentrations, changing to a more uniform pattern of approximately 8% at higher total GH concentrations.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. The relationship between total GH and non-22-kDa GH (non-22-kDa GH/total GH ratio; percentage). All time points in both Rest and Ex studies are shown.

 
There were significant differences between disappearance half-times of individual analytes (by one-way ANOVA, P = 0.017; see Table 3Go), with total GH, 22-kDa GH, rhGH, and GH-IFA having mean disappearance half-times of approximately 19–20 min, whereas Pit-GH and 20-kDa GH were significantly different from the other isoforms, averaging approximately 25 min (P < 0.0001). There were significant differences in the degree of conformity to an exponential decay between analytes (by one-way ANOVA for r2, P < 0.0001). Non-22-kDa GH did not disappear in a strictly exponential fashion, being markedly different from total GH, 22-kDa GH, Pit-GH, rhGH, and GH-IFA (P < 0.001 for each). The correlation coefficient for 20-kDa GH was good (r2 = 0.91 ± 0.03), but was inferior to the exponential curve fit for GH-IFA (P = 0.04), rhGH (P = 0.02), and Pit-GH (P = 0.03).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Disappearance half-times

 
There was no association between peak serum total GH and age, weight, fatness (percent body fat), fitness (VO2max or VO2max per kg), or serum testosterone, T4, or T3 concentrations.

Correlations between different assays are shown in Table 4Go. These relationships held when Rest and Ex data were compared separately (data not shown) or together.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Relationship between different GH assays

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The main findings in this study were 1) all molecular isoforms of GH measured increased with acute exercise; 2) 22-kDa GH was quantitatively the major isoform produced during exercise, 3) the relative proportions of GH isoforms other than 22-kDa increased after completion of exercise, and 4) the change in proportion of isoforms was due in part to slower disappearance rates of one or more isoforms.

This study demonstrated that 22-kDa GH was quantitatively the major molecular isoform to appear in serum in response to acute exercise. Twenty-two-kilodalton GH represented 73% of total GH at peak concentrations, as assessed by comparing assays with calibrated standards (Pharmacia IRMA and Delphia 22-kDa GH assay). The former assay is known to detect, in addition to 22-kDa GH, deaminated 22-kDa, dimeric 22-kDa, 20-kDa GH, and 17-kDa GH. In comparing the two new assays for total and 22-kDa GH (Pit-GH and rhGH, respectively) with these commercial assays, very close agreement was observed in terms of quantitation of peak concentrations.

Exercise-induced responses in 20-kDa GH, non-22-kDa GH (measured by the 22-kDa GH exclusion assay), and GH-IFA have also been specifically demonstrated. As 20-kDa GH is produced as a messenger ribonucleic acid splice variant of 22-kDa GH, parallel pituitary secretion of 22- and 20-kDa GH during exercise is implied. Earlier reports of the response of 20-kDa GH to exercise either used crude subtraction assays or lacked resting control studies (17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22). Non-22-kDa GH, measured by the 22-kDa GH exclusion assay, is predominantly composed of 20- and 17-kDa GH, representing approximately 5% and 3%, respectively, of total GH at the end of exercise (by subtraction). These findings conflict with prior reports that 17-kDa GH circulated in concentrations double that of 22-kDa GH (14, 30). The immunofunctional GH assay detected isoforms with the two binding sites necessary for receptor dimerization and signal transduction. The mean peak GH-IFA response was only 43% and 59% of total and 22-kDa peak concentrations, respectively, potentially relating to greater detection by the total and 22-kDa GH assays of dimerized, chemically altered, protein-bound, or smaller isoforms not immediately available for two-site receptor binding and the relative insensitivity of the GH-IFA to 20-kDa GH.

The magnitude of the GH response to exercise is, in general, proportional to the relative intensity of endurance-type exercise (16), given the parallel activation of sympatho-adrenal and other pituitary homeostatic responses (31). Nevertheless, the interindividual variability of peak GH responses, whether total GH or other isoforms, varied up to 10-fold between subjects despite completion of identical relative intensity, submaximal, nonexhaustive exercise. We concluded that the interindividual variability of GH responses was not caused by variations in isoforms of GH, as the correlations between total GH and other isoforms was high (r2 = 0.93–0.96).

A novel finding from this study was that the proportion of GH isoforms changed across acute exercise and into recovery. Although 22-kDa GH was the predominant isoform detected at peak concentrations (end of Ex), isoforms of GH other than 22-kDa increased during the postexercise period. This conclusion is derived from the peak in non-22-kDa GH/total GH occurring after the end of exercise, the progressive fall in rhGH/Pit-GH after a peak at the end of exercise (implying less 22-kDa GH), and the increase in 20-kDa GH/total GH after exercise. Taken together, these data suggest that the proportion of 20-kDa, 17-kDa, and possibly other non-22-kDa isoforms (dimers, oligomers, and GH bound to serum proteins) increased after exercise. The predicted change in the ratio of 22-kDa GH/total GH did not parallel those of the rhGH/Pit-GH ratio, possibly because the latter assay pair was optimized to distinguish between related isoforms.

The increase in the proportion of isoforms other than 22-kDa GH after exercise may be caused by 1) different pituitary isoform secretion; 2) appearance of isoforms from nonpituitary sources (3); 3) generation of fragments, dimers, and oligomers in the circulation (32); and 4) differences in clearance of different isoforms. Our data clearly show that there were differences in disappearance half-times, with slower disappearance of 20-kDa GH and Pit-GH, the latter having high affinity for dimeric forms (but limited sensitivity for 20-kDa GH). The 20-kDa GH has been shown to form both hetero- and homodimers with 20- and 22-kDa GH and to bind to large circulating binding proteins that have reduced clearance rates compared with 22-kDa GH bound to high affinity GH-binding protein (5, 33). We speculate that dimers and/or other more slowly cleared isoforms (22) contributed to the delayed disappearance of Pit-GH, because 20-kDa GH appeared unable to explain the difference quantitatively.

Our data support the contention that heterogeneity of isoforms is reduced during times of peak GH concentration (and presumed high pituitary secretory rate) and is increased at other times. Baumann also showed (34, 35) that the GH isoform mix was different between the basal and stimulated states. Using immunoadsorbent chromatography and gel electrophoresis to accurately measure GH isoforms at low concentrations, basal conditions revealed high variability of isoforms and immunoreactive fragments, with 30-, 16-, and 12-kDa isoforms being consistently identified. During states of high spontaneous secretion or pharmacological stimulation, the plasma GH pattern was predominantly composed of 22-kDa GH, 20-kDa GH, acidic GH, and dimers. The relative contributions of pituitary secretion and peripheral fragment generation to these processes remain to be determined.

The biological consequences of alterations of GH isoforms during and after exercise remain to be determined. Potentially, enhanced diabetogenic effects of smaller GH isoforms may prevent postexercise hypoglycemia (12, 15). In addition, stimulated GH concentrations are criteria for the diagnosis and treatment of GH deficiency in children and adults. The marked differences reported here between assays reinforces the need for assay standardization (36). Finally, our data may assist in the development of a test for exogenous recombinant human 22-kDa GH administration by athletes, which would rely on alterations in GH isoform ratios (23).


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank all members of the GH2000 team for their support and encouragement and Zida Wu for assay development.


    Footnotes
 
1 Presented in part at the Annual Scientific Meeting of the Endocrine Society of Australia, Melbourne, Australia, September 26–29, 1999. This work was supported in part by grants from the International Olympic Committee and the European Union (BIOMED 2 Project BMH4 CT950678). The development of the pit-GH and rhGH assays was supported by a grant from the Bundesinstitut für Sportwissenschaft, Cologne, Germany (VF 0408/08/02/98). Back

Received May 30, 2000.

Revised September 6, 2000.

Accepted September 30, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Baumann G. 1991 Growth hormone heterogeneity: genes, isohormones, variants, and binding proteins. Endocr Rev. 12:424–449.[Abstract]
  2. Lewis UJ, Sinha YN, Haro LS. 1994 Variant forms and fragments of human growth hormone in serum. Acta Paediatr. 399(Suppl):29–31.
  3. Untergasser G, Kranewitter W, Walser F, Madersbacher S, Dirnhoger S, Berger P. 1996 The testis as eutopic production site of human growth hormone, placental lactogen and prolactin: possible autocrine/paracrine effects on testicular function. Klin Wochenschr. 108:541–546.
  4. Warner MD, Sinha YN, Peabody CA. 1993 Potential abnormalities in molecular forms of growth hormone in schizophrenia: a pilot study. Biol Psychiatry. 34:487–491.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Baumann G, Stolar MW, Buchanan TA. 1986 The metabolic clearance, distribution of dimeric and monomeric growth hormone (GH): implications for the pattern of circulating GH forms. Endocrinology. 119:1497–1501.[Abstract]
  6. Leung DW, Spencer SA, Cachianes G, et al. 1987 Growth hormone receptor and serum binding protein: purification, cloning and expression. Nature. 330:537–543.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Kratzsch J, Selisko T, Birkenmeier G. 1996 Transformed {alpha}2-macroglobulin as a low-affinity growth hormone-binding protein. Acta Padiatr. 417(Suppl):108–110.
  8. Cuneo RC, Salomon F, McGauley GA, Sönksen PH. 1992 The growth hormone deficiency syndrome in adults. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 37:387–397.[Medline]
  9. McCarter J, Shaw MA, Winer LA, Baumann G. 1990 The 20,000 Da variant of human growth hormone does not bind to growth hormone receptors in human liver. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 73:11–14.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Wada M, Ikeda M, Takahashi Y, et al. 1997 The full agonistic effect of recombinant 20 kDa human growth hormone (hGH) on CHO cells stably transfected with hGH receptor cDNA. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 133:99–107.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Wada M, Uchida H, Ikeda M, et al. 1998 The 20-kilodalton (kDa) human growth hormone (hGH) differs from the 22-kDa hGH in the complex formation with cell surface hGH receptor and hGH-binding protein circulating in human plasma. Mol Endocrinol. 12:146–156.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Lewis UJ. 1984 Variants of growth hormone and prolactin and their posttranslational modifications. Annu Rev Physiol. 46:33–42.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Lewis UJ, Lewis LJ, Salem MAM, Staten NR, Galosy SS, Krivi GG. 1991 A recombinant-DNA-derived modification of human growth hormone (hGH44–191) with enhanced diabetogenic activity. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 78:45–54.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Sinha YN, Jacobsen BP. 1994 Human growth hormone (hGH)-(44–191), a reportedly diabetogenic fragment of hGH, circulates in human blood: measurement by radioimmunoassay. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 78:1411–1418.[Abstract]
  15. Rowlinson SW, Waters MJ, Lewis UJ, Barnard R. 1996 Human growth hormone fragments 1–43 and 44–191: in vitro somatogenic activity and receptor binding characteristics in human and nonprimate systems. Endocrinology. 137:90–95.[Abstract]
  16. Cuneo RC, Wallace JD. 1994 Growth hormone, insulin-like growth factors and sport. Endocrinol Metab. 1:3–13.
  17. Baumann G, Stolar MW. 1986 Molecular forms of human growth hormone secreted in vivo: nonspecificity of secretory stimuli. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 62:789–790.[Abstract]
  18. Doré S, Brisson GR, Fournier A, Montpetit R, Perrault H, Boisvert D. 1991 Contribution of hGH20k variant to blood hGH response in sauna and exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 62:130–134.[CrossRef]
  19. Doré S, Brisson GR, Fournier A, Massicotte D, Peronnet F, Gareau R. 1991 hGH20k species and variability of GH responses to long-duration exercise in male cyclists fed different food supplements. Horm Metab Res. 23:431–434.[Medline]
  20. Banfi G, Marinelli M, Roi GS, et al. 1994 Growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor l in athletes performing a marathon at 4000 m of altitude. Growth Regul. 4:82–86.[Medline]
  21. Schmidt W, Dore S, Hilgendorf A, Strauch S, Gareau R, Brisson GR. 1995 Effects of exercise during normoxia and hypoxia on the growth hormone-insulin-like growth factor I axis. Eur J Appl Physiol. 71:424–430.[CrossRef]
  22. Kraemer WJ, Nindl BC, Welsch JR, Marx JO, Deaver DR, Hymer WC. Size fractionation of hgh in plasma of young women: effects of acute heavy resistance exercise [Abstract] Proc of the 81st Annual Meet of The Endocrine Soc. 1999; 575.
  23. Wu Z, Bidlingmaier M, Dall R, Strasburger CJ. 1999 Detection of doping with human growth hormone. Lancet. 353:895.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Forbes GB. 1962 Methods for determining composition of the human body. Pediatrics. 29:477–494.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Wallace JD, Cuneo RC, Baxter R, et al. 1999 Responses of the growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor axis to exercise, GH administration, and GH withdrawal in trained adult males: a potential test for GH abuse in sport. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 84:3591–3601.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Wallace JD, Cuneo RC, Lundberg P-A, et al. 2000 Responses of markers of bone and collagen turnover to exercise, growth hormone (GH) administration, and GH withdrawal in trained adult males. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 85:124–133.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Boguszewski CL, Hynsjo L, Johannsson G, Bengtsson BA, Carlsson LMS. 1996 22-kD growth hormone exclusion assay: a new approach to measurement of non-22-kD growth hormone isoforms in human blood. Eur J Endocrinol. 135:573–582.[Abstract]
  28. Tsushima T, Katoh Y, Miyachi Y, et al. 1999 Serum concentration of 20K human growth hormone (20k hgh) measured by a specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 84:317–322.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Strasburger CJ, Wu Z, Pflaum C-D, Dressendörfer RA. 1996 Immunofunctional assay of human growth hormone (hgh) in serum: a possible consensus for quantitative hgh measurement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:2613–2620.[Abstract]
  30. Warner MD, Sinha YN, Peabody CA. 1993 Growth hormone and prolactin variants in normal subjects. Relative proportions in morning and afternoon samples. Horm Metab Res. 25:425–429.[Medline]
  31. Luger A, Watschinger B, Deuster P, Svoboda T, Clodi M, Chrousos GP. 1992 Plasma growth hormone and prolactin responses to graded levels of acute exercise and to a lactate infusion. Neuroendocrinology. 56:112–117.[Medline]
  32. Bieler EU, Pitout MJ, Stroud SW, Van-Rooyen RJ. 1977 Conversion of monomeric human growth hormone and big growth hormone into different molecular weight forms in vitro and after injection into humans. Horm Res. 8:29–36.[Medline]
  33. Baumann G, Stolar MW, Buchanan TA. 1985 Slow metabolic clearance rate of the 20,000-dalton variant of human growth hormone: implications for biological activity. Endocrinology. 117:1309–1313.[Abstract]
  34. Baumann G, Stolar MW, Amburn K. 1985 Molecular forms of circulating growth hormone during spontaneous secretory episodes and in the basal state. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 60:1216–1220.[Abstract]
  35. Galbo H, Holst JJ, Christensen NJ. 1979 The effect of different diets and on insulin on the hormonal response to prolonged exercise. Acta Physiol Scand. 107:19–32.[Medline]
  36. Growth Hormone Research Society. 1998 Invited report of a workshop: consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of adults with growth hormone deficiency: summary statement of the growth hormone research society workshop on adult growth hormone deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 83:379–381.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
J. Gibney, M.-L. Healy, and P. H. Sonksen
The Growth Hormone/Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Axis in Exercise and Sport
Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2007; 28(6): 603 - 624.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
B C Nindl and A. Fry
Exercise modulation of growth hormone isoforms: current knowledge and future directions for the exercise endocrinologist * Commentary
Br. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2007; 41(6): 346 - 348.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
W. J. Kraemer, B. C. Nindl, J. O. Marx, L. A. Gotshalk, J. A. Bush, J. R. Welsch, J. S. Volek, B. A. Spiering, C. M. Maresh, A. M. Mastro, et al.
Chronic resistance training in women potentiates growth hormone in vivo bioactivity: characterization of molecular mass variants
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, December 1, 2006; 291(6): E1177 - E1187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
M Saugy, N Robinson, C Saudan, N Baume, L Avois, and P Mangin
Human growth hormone doping in sport
Br. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2006; 40(suppl_1): i35 - i39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. Chung, D. Clifford, M. Buckley, and R. C. Baxter
Novel Biomarkers of Human Growth Hormone Action from Serum Proteomic Profiling Using Protein Chip Mass Spectrometry
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2006; 91(2): 671 - 677.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Berggren, C. Ehrnborg, T. Rosen, L. Ellegard, B.-A. Bengtsson, and K. Caidahl
Short-Term Administration of Supraphysiological Recombinant Human Growth Hormone (GH) Does Not Increase Maximum Endurance Exercise Capacity in Healthy, Active Young Men and Women with Normal GH-Insulin-Like Growth Factor I Axes
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2005; 90(6): 3268 - 3273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. Ehrnborg, K. H. W. Lange, R. Dall, J. S. Christiansen, P.-A. Lundberg, R. C. Baxter, M. A. Boroujerdi, B.-A. Bengtsson, M.-L. Healey, C. Pentecost, et al.
The Growth Hormone/Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Axis Hormones and Bone Markers in Elite Athletes in Response to a Maximum Exercise Test
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2003; 88(1): 394 - 401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
W. C. Hymer, W. J. Kraemer, B. C. Nindl, J. O. Marx, D. E. Benson, J. R. Welsch, S. A. Mazzetti, J. S. Volek, and D. R. Deaver
Characteristics of circulating growth hormone in women after acute heavy resistance exercise
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, October 1, 2001; 281(4): E878 - E887.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. D. Wallace, R. C. Cuneo, M. Bidlingmaier, P. A. Lundberg, L. Carlsson, C. L. Boguszewski, J. Hay, M. Boroujerdi, A. Cittadini, R. Dall, et al.
Changes in Non-22-Kilodalton (kDa) Isoforms of Growth Hormone (GH) after Administration of 22-kDa Recombinant Human GH in Trained Adult Males
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2001; 86(4): 1731 - 1737.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wallace, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Strasburger, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wallace, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Strasburger, C. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals