help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Szulc, P.
Right arrow Articles by Delmas, P. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Szulc, P.
Right arrow Articles by Delmas, P. D.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 86, No. 1 192-199
Copyright © 2001 by The Endocrine Society


Original Studies

Bioavailable Estradiol May Be an Important Determinant of Osteoporosis in Men: The MINOS Study1

P. Szulc, F. Munoz, B. Claustrat, P. Garnero, F. Marchand, F. Duboeuf and P. D. Delmas

INSERM, U-403; and Hôpital Neuro-Cardiologique (B.C.), 69437 Lyon, France; and Société de Secours Minière de Bourgogne (F.M.), 71300 Montceau les Mines, France

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Prof. Pierre D. Delmas, INSERM, U- 403, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, place d’Arsonval, 69437 Lyon, France. E-mail: delmas{at}lyon151.inserm.fr


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
During recent years, experimental data, case reports, and epidemiological studies have suggested an important role for estradiol in bone metabolism in men. In a cohort of 596 men, aged 51–85 yr, we measured bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine, hip, total body, and forearm; serum levels of sex steroid hormones [total and free testosterone, total estradiol (17ßE2), bioavailable estradiol (bio-17ßE2), androstenedione, and sex hormone-binding globulin]; and markers of bone turnover [serum osteocalcin, bone alkaline phosphatase, N-terminal extension propeptide of type I collagen, and ß-isomerized C-terminal telopeptide of collagen type I (ßCTX)], as well as urinary excretion of ßCTX and deoxypyridinoline (DPyr). An age-related decrease was found for bio-17ßE2 (r = -0.16; P < 0.001), free testosterone (r = -0.25; P < 0.001), free testosterone index (r = -0.32; P < 0.001), and androstenedione (r = -0.22; P < 0.001), but not for total 17ßE2 or total testosterone. 17ßE2 and bio-17ßE2, but not other hormones, were correlated with BMD after adjustment for age and body weight. In men with a bio-17ßE2 level in the lowest quartile, the average BMD was lower than in men having a bio-17ßE2 level in the highest quartile by 6.6–8.7% according to the site of measurement, which corresponded to 0.45–0.65 SD. In age- and body weight-adjusted models, bio-17ßE2, but not other hormones, was negatively correlated with bone markers (e.g., osteocalcin: r = -0.14; P < 0.001; urinary ßCTX: r = -0.20; P = 0.0001; DPyr: r = -0.14; P < 0.001). In men with the lowest concentration of bio-17ßE2 (first quartile), the concentrations of markers of bone turnover were higher by 11–35% (or 0.4–0.7 SD) than in men having the highest bio-17ßE2 level (upper quartile). In men in the lowest quartile for bio-17ßE2 and in the highest quartile for urinary DPyr or ßCTX, the BMD of total hip and that of distal forearm were 8% and 10% lower than in men in the highest quartile for bio-17ßE2 and in the lowest quartile for DPyr or ßCTX. In the age- and body weight-adjusted multiple regression models, bio-17ßE2 contributed significantly to the explanation for the variability in all markers.

In summary, we found in a cross-sectional analysis of a cohort of men that low levels of bio-17ßE2 are associated with high bone turnover and low BMD. These data suggest that the age-related decrease in bio-17ßE2 contributes to bone loss in elderly men by increasing bone turnover. Low 17ßE2 levels may be an important risk factor for osteoporosis in men.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
IN RECENT YEARS, an important role of 17ß-estradiol (17ßE2) in bone metabolism of men was suggested in case reports and epidemiological studies (1, 2, 3). These data were strengthened by experimental studies in which orchidectomy and treatment with an aromatase inhibitor had a similar effect on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover in aged male rats (4).

In young men, 17ßE2 seems to be necessary for growth, acquisition of peak bone mass, and consolidation of growth cartilage (2). In elderly men, a correlation between BMD and serum 17ßE2 was positive and significant, in contrast to the correlations of BMD with total testosterone (T), free T, androstenedione, and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) (5, 6, 7). Elderly men with low levels of 17ßE2 had a higher prevalence of vertebral deformities (8). Although age- and body weight-adjusted partial correlations were significant, they were relatively weak, suggesting that 17ßE2 levels explain only a small percentage of the variability in BMD in elderly men. The biological impact of 17ßE2 concentration, i.e. difference in BMD between the men with the highest and those with the lowest levels, is not well known (7). Finally, data concerning correlations of 17ßE2 with biochemical markers of bone turnover in elderly men are scarce (6).

The aim of the study was to verify whether 17ßE2 and its bioavailable fraction (bio-17ßE2) are correlated with the levels of bone biochemical markers and to evaluate the impact of 17ßE2 on BMD and biochemical bone marker levels in a large cohort of elderly men.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Description of the cohort

The MINOS study is a prospective study of osteoporosis and its determinants in men that was initiated in 1995. It is a collaboration between INSERM (National Institute of Health and Medical Research) and Société de Secours Minière de Bourgogne (SSMB) in Montceau les Mines, France. Montceau les Mines is a town of about 35000 inhabitants situated 130 km northwest of Lyon in the Department (District) of Saône et Loire. SSMB is one of the largest health insurance companies in this district. A detailed description of the cohort was published recently (9). Invitations to our study with explanations of the aim of the study were sent to a random sample of men, aged 51–85 yr, who were insured by SSMB. All men responded to an epidemiological questionnaire covering demographic and behavioral information as well as detailed medical history (diseases, accidents, and medications) of conditions that could influence bone mass and metabolism. Informed written consent was obtained from all participants. From this analysis we excluded 106 men with diseases or receiving treatment known to affect bone metabolism (Paget’s disease, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondyloarthritis, primary hyperparathyroidism, Cushing’s disease, hemochromatosis, liver cirrhosis, gastrectomy, and Klinefelter’s syndrome; treatment with fluoride, bisphosphonate, T4, or oral corticosteroids). This analysis was performed in a group of 596 men, aged 51–85 yr, who had all the diagnostic tests and all the hormonal measurements performed. The 79 men who had to be excluded because of a in insufficient volume of serum did not differ from the main cohort based on the comparisons of age, body weight, body height, bone mineral density, levels of hormones, and levels of biochemical markers of bone turnover.

Bone mass measurement

BMD was measured at the lumbar spine, right hip, and whole body using pencil-beam dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (QDR-1500, Hologic, Inc., Waltham, MA) and at the distal and ultradistal nondominant forearm using single energy x-ray absorptiometry (DTX 100, Osteo-meter, Rodovre, Denmark). Antero-posterior spine BMD was measured at lumbar vertebrae 2–4. At the hip, five regions of interest were evaluated: femoral neck, trochanter, intertrochanter region, Ward’s triangle, and total hip. At the forearm, two regions of interest were evaluated. The distal site includes 24 mm of ulna and radius situated proximally to the site where the spacing between the two bones is 8 mm. The ultradistal region comprises only the most distal part of the radius. Details concerning quality assurance have been recently described (9).

Biochemical measurements

Fasting serum as well as 24-h urine were collected and stored at -80 C until assayed. Serum total osteocalcin (OC) was measured with a human-specific two-site immunoradiometric assay (ELSA-OSTEO, CIS BioInternational, Bagnols/Ceze, France), which recognizes a large N-terminal midfragment in addition to the intact molecule (10). Intra- and interassay coefficients of variation are less than 4% and 6%, respectively, and the sensitivity is 0.08 nmol/L. Serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) was measured with an immunoassay using a monoclonal antibody directed against BAP purified from human SAOS-2 osteosarcoma cells as a standard followed by a conventional colorimetric detection using paranitrophenyl phosphate (Alkphase-B, Metra Biosystems, Inc., Mountain View, CA) (11). This assay has a low cross-reactivity with circulating liver, placental, and intestinal isoenzymes (<15%). The sensitivity of the assay is 0.7 U/L. Intra- and interassay coefficients of variation are less than 6% and 8%, respectively. Serum N-terminal extension propeptide of type I collagen (PINP) was measured by a RIA that recognizes the intact circulating form of PINP (intact PINP; Farmos Diagnostica, Uppsala, Sweden) (12). Intra- and interassay coefficients of variation are below 5% and 8%, respectively, and the detection limit is 1 ng/mL.

Urinary ß-isomerized C-terminal telopeptide of collagen type I (ßCTX) was measured with a enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA; CrossLaps ELISA, Osteometer) as described previously (13, 14). The antigen Glu-Lys-Ala-His-ß-Asp-Gly-Gly-Arg is a fragment of C- telopeptide of the {alpha}1-chain of type I collagen. The sensitivity of the assay is 0.5 µg/L. Intra- and interassay coefficients of variation are less than 10% and 15%, respectively. This assay does not react with free cross-links, and its cross-reactivity with {alpha}CTX is less than 1%. Serum ß-isomerized C-terminal telopeptide of collagen type I (ßCTX) was measured by ELISA (CrossLaps One Step ELISA, Osteometer) as described previously (15, 16). The sensitivity of the assay is 0.092 nmol/L. Intra- and interassay coefficients of variation are less than 8%. Urinary total deoxypyridinoline (DPyr) was measured by ELISA (Pyrilin ks-D, Metra Biosystems Inc., Mountain View, CA) after acid hydrolysis. This assay uses a monoclonal antibody with less than 1% cross-reactivity with free pyridinoline and 10% cross-reactivity with cross-linked polypeptides (17). The sensitivity of the assay is 3 nmol/L. Intra- and interassay coefficients of variation are less than 10%.

Hormones

Serum total 17ßE2 and total T were measured by tritiated RIA after diethylether extraction (18). For T, the limit of detection is 0.06 nmol/L, and the interassay coefficient of variation is 10% for a concentration of 1 nmol/L and 7.8% for 6 nmol/L. For total 17ßE2, the limit of detection is 11 pmol/L, and the interassay coefficient of variation is 9.4% for a concentration of 169 pmol/L and 6.2% for 510 pmol/L. SHBG was measured by immunoradiometric assay (125I SBP Coatria, Bio-Mérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) with an interassay coefficient of variation of 4.1% for a concentration of 16 nmol/L and 5.3% for 100 nmol/L. The limit of detection is 0.5 nmol/L. Serum free T was measured by RIA (Coat-A-Count, Behring, Deerfield, IL). The interassay coefficient of variation is 5.5% for a concentration of 0.16 pmol/L and 3.4% for 14.7 pmol/L. The limit of detection is 0.05 pmol/L. As the concentration of free T may be influenced by the serum protein concentration, we calculated the bioavailable T level (bio-T) using the formula: bio-T = free T x (3.6 x 104 L/mol x albumin concentration + 1) (18). The free T index (FTI) was calculated using the formula: total T/SHBG. Serum androstenedione was measured by tritiated RIA after diethylether extraction (19). The interassay coefficient of variation is 6% for a concentration of 1.96 nmol/L and 8.3% for 3.98 nmol/L. Serum bio-17ßE2 was measured using the method described by Tremblay and Dube (20). Briefly, SHBG and the hormones bound to it were precipitated using 50% ammonium sulfate. In the supernatant, bio-17ßE2 was measured using the same RIA as that used for total 17ßE2. The interassay coefficient of variation is 13% for a concentration of 56 pmol/L.

Evaluation of spinal arthritis

Arthritis of the lumbar spine was evaluated on the antero-posterior and lateral radiographs of the lumbar spine performed according to a standardized protocol described recently (9). They were analyzed by a single observer blinded to BMD results. The arthritis score was based on previously published scores (21, 22, 23). As osteophytes more that 3 mm in length were found to significantly influence spine BMD, we used the following grades: no osteophyte, grade 0; osteophyte less than 3 mm, grade 1; osteophyte 3–6 mm, grade 2; osteophyte more than 6 mm,grade 3; no or mild endplate sclerosis, grade 0; marked end-plate sclerosis, grade 1 (osteophytes and endplate sclerosis were evaluated independently on superior and inferior plate of vertebral bodies); no posterior arthritis, grade 0; and marked posterior arthritis, grade 1. The total arthritis score (i.e. 1–27) was evaluated by summing up for lumbar vertebrae from L2 to L4. As aortic calcifications were not found to influence lumbar spine BMD, they were not analyzed (21, 22, 23).

Statistical methods

All calculations were performed using SAS software (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC). Correlations between the variables were evaluated using Pearson’s simple and partial correlation coefficients as well as multiple linear regression. BMDs of different sites of measurement and levels of bone biochemical markers were compared in four groups corresponding to quartiles of the bio-17ßE2 level using the age- and body weight-adjusted analysis of covariance.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Correlation of sex hormones with age and body weight

Densitometric, biochemical, and hormonal data of the cohort are presented in Table 1Go. Total T and total 17ßE2 did not decrease significantly with age and remained stable even in very old men (Table 2Go). Free T, bio-T, and FTI as well as bio-17ßE2 concentrations decreased with age. Androstenedione decreased with age, whereas the serum concentration of SHBG increased with age. Total, free, and bio-T decreased with increasing body weight. SHBG decreased, whereas bio-17ßE2 increased slightly with increasing body weight. Total 17ßE2, androstenedione, and FTI were not correlated with body weight.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Description of the 596 men, aged 51–85 yr, belonging to the cohort MINOS

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Simple correlation coefficients between sex steroid hormones or sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) levels and age or body weight in a cohort of 596 men, aged 51–85 yr

 
Correlation of sex hormones with BMD

The BMD of all sites of measurement was correlated significantly with the concentrations of total 17ßE2 and bio-17ßE2. FTI was correlated positively with the BMD of the forearm, and there was a weak negative correlation between SHBG and BMD of hip, forearm, and whole body bone mineral content (BMC; Table 3Go). Other simple correlations were nonsignificant. However, at all sites, BMD decreased with age [for lumbar spine, in the men without osteoarthritis (OA): r = -0.15–0.32; P = 0.0001] and increased with body weight (r = 0.22–0.65; P = 0.0001). Thus, all correlations between the hormones and BMD were adjusted for age and body weight. The BMD of the hip was correlated positively with 17ßE2 and bio-17ßE2, but not with total, bio-, or free T; FTI; androstenedione; or SHBG (Table 4Go). Whole body BMC and BMD were correlated significantly with 17ßE2 and bio-17ßE2 and, more weakly, with free and bio-T. The BMDs of the distal forearm and ultradistal radius were correlated positively with 17ßE2 and bio-17ßE2, but not with total, bio-, and free T; FTI; androstenedione; or SHBG. In men without severe OA, lumbar spine BMD was positively correlated with 17ßE2 and bio-17ßE2, but not with other biochemical parameters. After adjustment for age and body weight, total hip and distal forearm BMD as well as whole body BMC were lower in men with the lowest bio-17ßE2 level (first quartile) than in men in the three upper quartiles (Q2–Q4; Fig. 1Go). The quartile values of bio-17ßE2 were as follows: Q1, 53 pmol/L; Q2, 63 pmol/L; and Q3, 75 pmol/L.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Simple correlations of sexual steroid concentrations with bone biochemical markers levels (log-transformed) and bone mineral density

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Age- and body weight-adjusted partial correlation coefficients between BMD and sexual steroid hormones in a cohort of men, aged 51–85 yr

 


View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. BMD in 596 men, aged 51–85 yr, according to the quartiles of serum bio-17ßE2 concentration after adjustment for age and body weight. A, Total hip BMD (F = 5.14; P < 0.002); B, distal forearm BMD (F = 4.99; P = 0.002); C, whole body BMC (F = 3.15; P < 0.03).

 
Correlation of sex steroids with biochemical markers of bone turnover

Among the biochemical markers of bone turnover, only DPyr increased with age (r = 0.21; P = 0.0001). OC as well as urinary and serum ßCTX were correlated negatively with body weight (r = -0.11 and P < 0.01, r = -0.16 and P = 0.0001, and r = -0.12 and P < 0.01, respectively). The steroid hormones disclosed variable correlations with age and body weight (Table 2Go). Thus, all statistical models were adjusted for age and body weight. The levels of biochemical markers (except BAP) were correlated negatively (r = -0.11–0.17; P < 0.01–0.0001) with the bio-17ßE2 level after adjustment for age and body weight (Table 5Go). Some bone markers disclosed a weak, but significant, inverse correlation with 17ßE2 or FTI and a positive correlation with SHBG, but not with androstenedione and total, free, or bio-T. In the multiple regression, bio-17ßE2 contributed slightly, but significantly, to the explanation for the variability in biochemical bone marker levels (Table 6Go). For example, age and body weight explained 2.8% of the variability in urinary ßCTX, and addition of bio-17ßE2 to the model increased the percentage of the explained variability to 5.7%.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Age- and body weight-adjusted partial correlations between bone biochemical markers levels (log-transformed) and sexual steroid concentrations

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. Contribution of bio-17ßE2 level to the explanation of the variability of the biochemical bone marker levels in 596 men, aged 51–85 yr

 
Average levels of markers of bone turnover were evaluated according to the increasing quartiles for bio-17ßE2 after adjustment for age and body weight. For the markers of bone formation (Fig. 2Go) and for the markers of bone resorption (Fig. 3Go), the average levels were the highest in the men with the lowest concentration of bio-17ßE2 (Q1). Differences between the average levels of markers of bone turnover were smaller or nonsignificant in men in the three upper quartiles (Q2–Q4) for bio-17ßE2 concentration.



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Levels of biochemical markers of bone formation in 596 men, aged 51–85 yr, according to the quartiles of serum bio-17ßE2 concentration after adjustment for age and body weight. A, OC (partial F = 5.72; P < 0.001); B, BAP (partial F = 3.29; P = 0.02); C, PINP (partial F = 3.41; P < 0.02).

 


View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Levels of biochemical markers of bone resorption in 596 men, aged 51–85 yr, according to the quartiles of serum bio-17ßE2 concentration after adjustment for age and body weight. A, Total DPyr (partial F = 4.12; P < 0.01); B, 24-h urinary ßCTX (partial F = 6.15; P < 0.001); C, serum ßCTX (partial F = 3.68; P < 0.02).

 
Association between the concentration of bio-17ßE2 and BMD or bone markers

To evaluate the association among bio-17ßE2 level, bone turnover, and BMD, we compared average BMD and levels of bone markers in men with the lowest concentration of bio-17ßE2 (first quartile) to values in men with the highest concentrations of bio-17ßE2 (fourth quartile). In those in the lowest bio-17ßE2 quartile, the average BMDs of total hip, lumbar spine (without OA), distal forearm, and ultradistal radius were lower than those in men in the highest quartile by 7.7%, 7.5%, 6.6%, and 8.7%, respectively. This difference corresponds to 0.65, 0.45, 0.60, and 0.64 SD.

Men in the lowest quartile for bio-17ßE2 had 11–18% higher average concentrations of markers of bone formation than men with the highest bio-17ßE2 level, which corresponded to 0.4–0.6 SD. The average serum and urinary ßCTX levels were higher by 25–35% (0.6–0.7 SD) in men with the lowest bio-17ßE2 levels compared with those in the highest quartile. Urinary levels of total DPyr were also higher in men in the lowest quartile for bio-17ßE2 compared with those of men in the highest quartile (16% or 0.5 SD).

In men in both the lowest quartile of bio-17ßE2 and the highest quartile of urinary DPyr or ßCTX, the average BMDs of total hip and distal forearm were 8% and 10% lower, respectively, than those in men in both the highest quartile of bio-17ßE2 and the lowest quartile of bone resorption marker. In men in both the lowest quartile of FTI and the highest quartile of urinary DPyr or ßCTX, the average BMDs of total hip and forearm were 6% and 7% lower, respectively, compared with those in men in the highest quartile of FTI and the lowest quartile of the marker of bone resorption (Fig. 4Go).



View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Age- and body weight-adjusted average total hip BMD according to quartiles of urinary excretion of DPyr and serum bio-17ßE2 concentration (left) or according to quartiles of FTI (right) in 596 men, aged 51–85 yr.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The major finding of our study is that the level of bio-17ßE2, but not that of total 17ßE2, is negatively correlated with bone turnover, as assessed by sensitive and specific biochemical markers in men over the age of 50 yr. We also confirm that 17ßE2 and bio-17ßE2 are correlated positively with BMD of the hip, forearm, lumbar spine, and whole body. In men with a bio-17ßE2 level in the lowest quartile, the average BMD is lower by 6.6–8.7% (i.e. 0.45–0.65 SD), and the average levels of bone metabolic markers are higher by 11–35% (i.e. 0.4–0.7 SD) compared with those in the men in the highest quartile. Correlations of total, free, and bio-T, androstenedione, SHBG, as well as FTI with BMD and bone markers are weak or nonsignificant.

During recent years, the role of 17ßE2 in bone metabolism in men has been suggested in several studies. In early pubertal boys, an increase in 17ßE2 coincides with the peak growth velocity during the pubertal growth spurt (24). Case reports of young osteopenic and still growing men presenting mutations of estrogen receptor or aromatase genes showed that 17ßE2 is necessary for the acquisition of peak BMD and the consolidation of growth cartilage (25, 26, 27). Treatment with 17ßE2, but not with T, in two men with the aromatase gene mutation resulted in an increase in BMD, consolidation of growth cartilage, and cessation of growth (27, 28), whereas treatment with 17ßE2 or T was ineffective in a man who had no functional estrogen receptor due to a premature stop codon in the estrogen receptor gene (25). Two young men with Noonan’s syndrome described recently had undetectable 17ßE2 levels and severe osteoporosis, although their T, free T, and dihydrotestosterone levels were normal (29). Preliminary results presented by Braidman et al. suggest a very low cellular level of estrogen receptor {alpha} in young men with idiopathic osteoporosis (30). Similarly, in osteoporotic men, the concentration of 17ßE2, but not that of T or dihydroepiandrosterone, was lower than that in age-matched healthy men (31). In T-treated osteoporotic men, the increase in BMD was correlated with the increase in 17ßE2, but not with that in T (32). Treatment with 17ßE2 decreased the levels of bone turnover markers in healthy elderly men and in patients who had been orchidectomized due to prostatic cancer (33, 34). Treatment with 17ßE2 prevented bone loss in elderly men who had been orchidectomized due to prostatic cancer and in male-female transsexuals and increased BMD in patients with the androgen insensitivity syndrome (35, 36, 37).

In our cohort, FTI as well as concentrations of free and of bio-T and bio-17ßE2 decreased with age, whereas those of total T and 17ßE2 remained stable, which confirms previous data (38, 39, 40). The decrease in the biologically active fraction of 17ßE2 may result from an increase in SHBG and a decrease in circulating free T, which is a substrate for peripheral aromatization.

In previous studies performed in elderly men, 17ßE2 and bio-17ßE2 concentrations were correlated with BMD independently of age, body weight, or other variables, in contrast to T, free T, bio-T, dehydroepiandrosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, androstenedione, or SHBG, which were weakly or nonsignificantly correlated with BMD (5, 6, 7, 41). Our results also suggest that 17ßE2 is the most potent determinant of BMD among sexual steroids in men. However, its correlations with BMD are weak, and the difference between the average BMD in men with concentrations of bio-17ßE2 in the lowest quartile and those with concentrations in the highest quartile is about 0.5–0.6 SD. This difference is mainly due to a lower BMD in men with the lowest levels (first quartile) of bio-17ßE2. Greendale et al. (5) used a linear model of relation between bio-17ßE2 level and BMD. They showed that an increase in bio-17ßE2 by 1 SD resulted in a average increase in BMD by 0.13–0.18 SD in men, which was comparable to that observed in postmenopausal women (0.1–0.2 SD). By extrapolation of data from other studies, the risk of fracture in the men with the lowest 17ßE2 level is 50–100% higher than that in the men with the highest concentration of 17ßE2 (42). Age- and body weight-adjusted correlations of BMD with 17ßE2 and bio-17ßE2 were similar, in contrast to the study by Khosla, who found stronger simple correlations of BMD with bio-17ßE2 compared with 17ßE2 (6). Body weight is correlated positively with BMD and negatively with SHBG. Thus, an increase in body weight could have resulted in an increase in the bio-17ßE2, as suggested by our study, and could have falsely augmented the simple correlations between BMD and bio-17ßE2.

Our study is concentrated on the correlation between the bio-17ßE2 level and biochemical markers of bone turnover. Levels of biochemical bone markers were negatively correlated with bio-17ßE2, but not with 17ßE2, after adjustment for age and body weight. This seems logical, because the bone biochemical markers reflect the present metabolic status of the skeleton, which depends on the present concentration of the biologically active fraction of the hormone. In the men in the lowest quartile for bio-17ßE2, the levels of ßCTX are 25–35% higher, whereas the bone formation markers are only 15% higher compared with those in men in the upper quartile for bio-17ßE2. This pattern suggests that low bio-17ßE2 levels are associated with increased bone resorption, which is only partly matched by increased bone formation. This uncoupling may result in bone loss. These results are in agreement with data showing an age-related increase in bone marker levels and their negative correlation with BMD in elderly men, suggesting that the age-related bone loss in men may be associated with an increased bone turnover (6, 43). BMD is lower and bone turnover is increased mainly in men in the lowest quartile for bio-17ßE2, suggesting a threshold for bio-17ßE2 under which bone turnover increases, leading to bone loss.

The weak correlations between bio-17ßE2 and 17ßE2 levels, on the one hand, and BMD or bone biochemical markers, on the other, may be due to several reasons. 17ßE2 may have a small impact on bone metabolism and BMD. Correlation coefficients may be falsely diminished due to measurement errors. Serum 17ßE2 levels may not reflect hormonal level in peripheral tissues. Bone cells contain not only estrogen receptors (44, 45), but also enzymes of sex steroid pathways, such as aromatase and 17ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (46, 47, 48, 49, 50). Aromatase activity and messenger ribonucleic acid were found in human osteosarcoma cell lines and in primary human osteoblasts. Expression of messenger ribonucleic acid of three types of 17ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (I, II, and IV) was also identified in human osteosarcoma cell lines. These findings suggest that human osteoblastic cells may synthesize estrogens from androgens and interconvert 17-keto- and 17ß-hydroxy forms of sexual steroids. The physiological importance of the local metabolism of sex steroids in bone remains to be established. It will be also useful for a better understanding of our data. For example, FTI disclosed a significant positive correlation with some biochemical bone markers but not with BMD, in contrast to the recent data presented by Scopacasa et al. (51). However, FTI is strongly correlated with bio-17ßE2, because 17ßE2 decreases the level of SHBG. Moreover, FTI corresponds to the biologically available fraction of T that may enter the cell. As T may undergo aromatization in the bone cells, the positive correlation of FTI with biochemical bone markers does not necessarily mean that T is the active hormone at the level of bone.

Using a panel of sensitive bone markers in a cohort of elderly men, we showed that the low level of bio-17ßE2 is associated with accelerated bone turnover. We confirm the positive correlation of 17ßE2 level with BMD and suggest that the age-related decrease in bio-17ßE2 contributes to bone loss in elderly men by increasing bone turnover.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by INSERM/Merck, Sharp, & Dohme (Chibret, France). Presented in abstract form at the World Congress on Osteoporosis 2000, Chicago, Illinois. Back

Received July 11, 2000.

Revised September 26, 2000.

Accepted October 2, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Anderson FH, Francis RM, Selby PL, Cooper C. 1998 Sex hormones and osteoporosis in men. Calcif Tissue Int. 62:185–188.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Grumbach MM, Auchus RJ. 1999 Estrogen: consequences and implications of human mutations in synthesis and action. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 84:4677–4694.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Riggs BL, Khosla S, Melton III LJ. 1998 A unitary model for involutional osteoporosis: estrogen deficiency causes both type I and type II osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and contributes to bone loss in aging men. J Bone Miner Res. 13:763–773.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Vanderschueren D, van Herck E, de Coster R, Bouillon R. 1996 Aromatization of androgens is important for skeletal maintenance of aged male rats. Calcif Tissue Int. 59:179–183.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Greendale GA, Edelstein S, Barrett-Connor E. 1997 Endogenous sex steroids and bone mineral density in older women and men: the Rancho Bernardo study. J Bone Miner Res. 12:1833–1843.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Khosla S, Melton III LJ, Atkinson EJ, O’Fallon WM, Klee GG, Riggs BL. 1998 Relationship of serum sex steroid levels and bone turnover markers with bone mineral density in men and women: a key role for bioavailable estrogen. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 83:2266–2274.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Slemenda CW, Longcope C, Zhou L, Hui SL, Peacock M, Johnston CC. 1997 Sex stroids and bone mass in older men. J Clin Invest. 100:1755–1759.[Medline]
  8. Barrett-Connor E, Mueller JE, von Mühlen DG, Laughlin GA, Schneider L, Sartoris DJ. 2000 Low levels of estradiol are associated with vertebral fractures in older men, but not women: the Rancho Bernardo study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 85:219–223.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Szulc P, Marchand F, Duboeuf F, Delmas PD. 2000 Cross-sectional assessment of age-related bone loss in men: the MINOS study. Bone. 26:123–129.[Medline]
  10. Garnero P, Grimaux M, Demiaux B, Preaudat C, Seguin P, Delmas PD. 1992 Measurement of serum osteocalcin with human-specific two-site immunoradiometric assay. J Bone Miner Res. 7:1389–1398.[Medline]
  11. Gomez B, Ardakani S, Ju J, et al. 1995 Monoclonal antibody assay for measuring bone-specific alkaline phosphatase activity in serum. Clin Chem. 41:1560–1566.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Melkko J, Kauppila S, Niemi S, et al. 1996 Immunoassay for intact amino-terminal propeptide of human type I procollagen. Clin Chem. 42:947–954.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Garnero P, Gineyts E, Riou JP, Delmas PD. 1994 Assessment of bone resorption with a new marker of collagen degradation in patients with metabolic bone disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 79:780–785.[Abstract]
  14. Pedersen BJ, Ravn P, Bonde M. 1998 Type I collagen C-telopeptide degradation products as bone resorption markers. J Clin Ligand Assay. 21:118–127.
  15. Christgau S, Rosenquist C, Alexandersen P, et al. 1998 Clinical evaluation of the serum CrossLaps one step ELISA, a new assay measuring the serum concentration of bone-derived degradation products of type I collagen C-telopeptides. Clin Chem. 44:2290–2300.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Rosenquist C, Fledelius C, Christgau S, et al. 1998 Serum CrossLaps one step ELISA. First application of monoclonal antobodies for measurement in serum of bone-related degradation products from C-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen. Clin Chem. 44:2281–2289.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Robins SP, Woitge H, Hesley R, Ju J, Seyedin S, Seibel MJ. 1994 Direct, enzyme-linked immunoassay for urinary deoxypyridinoline as a specific marker for measuring bone resorption. J Bone Miner Res. 9:1643–1649.[Medline]
  18. Vermeulen A, Verdonck L, Kaufman JM. 1999 A critical evaluation of simple methods for the estimation of free testosterone in serum. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 84:3666–3672.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Bremond AG, Claustrat B, Rudigoz RC, Seffert P, Corniau J. 1982 Estradiol, androstenedione, and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate in the ovarian and peripheral blood of postmenopausal patients with and without endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 14:119–124.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Tremblay RR, Dube JY. 1974 Plasma concentrations of free and non-TeBG bound testosterone in women on oral contraceptives. Contraception. 10:599–605.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Liu G, Peacock M, Eilam O, Dorulla G, Braunstein E, Johnston CC. 1997 Effect of osteoarthritis in the lumbar spine and hip on bone mineral density and diagnosis of osteoporosis in elderly men and women. Osteop Int. 7:564–569.[Medline]
  22. Orwoll ES, Oviatt SK, Mann T. 1990 The impact of osteophytic and vascular calcifications on vertebral mineral density measurements in men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 70:1202–1207.[Abstract]
  23. von der Recke P, Hansen MA, Overgaard K, Christiansen C. 1996 The impact of degenerative conditions in the spine on bone mineral density and fracture risk prediction. Osteop Int. 6:43–49.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Klein KO, Martha PM, Blizzard RM, Herbst T, Rogol AD. 1996 A longitudinal assessment of hormonal and physical alterations during normal puberty in boys estrogen levels as determined by ultrasensitive assay. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:3203–3207.[Abstract]
  25. Smith EP, Boyd J, Frank GR, et al. 1994 Estrogen resistance caused by a mutation in the estrogen-receptor gene in a man. N Engl J Med. 331:1056–1061.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Morishima A, Grumbach MM, Simpson ER, Fisher C, Qin K. 1995 Aromatase deficiency in male and female siblings caused by a novel mutation and the physiological role of estrogens. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 80:3689–3698.[Abstract]
  27. Carani C, Qin K, Simoni M, et al. 1997 Effect of testosterone and estradiol in a man with aromatase deficiency. N Engl J Med. 337:91–95.[Free Full Text]
  28. Bilezikian JP, Morishima A, Bell J, Grumbach MM. 1998 Increased bone mass as a result of estrogen therapy in a man with aromatase deficiency. N Engl J Med. 339:599–603.[Free Full Text]
  29. Takagi M, Miyashita Y, Koga M, Ebara S, Arita N, Kasayama S. 2000 Estrogen deficiency is a potential cause for osteopenia in adult male patients with Noonan’s syndrome. Calcif Tissue Int. 66:200–203.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Braidman I, Baris C, Wood L, et al. 2000 Preliminary evidence for impaired estrogen receptor-{alpha} protein expression in osteoblasts and osteocytes from men with idiopathic osteoporosis. Bone. 26:423–427.[Medline]
  31. Gillberg P, Johansson AG, Ljunghall S. 1999 Decreased estradiol levels and free androgen index and elevated sex hormone-binding globulin levels in male idiopathic osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int. 64:209–213.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Anderson FH, Francis RM, Peaston RT, Wastell HJ. 1997 Androgen supplementation in eugonadal men with osteoporosis: effects of six months’ treatment on markers of bone formation and resorption. J Bone Miner Res. 12:472–478.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Taxel P, Raisz LG. 1997 The effect of estrogen therapy on older men with low bone mass [Abstract F510]. J Bone Miner Res. 12(Suppl 1):S353.
  34. Carlström K, Stege R, Henriksson P, Grande M, Gunnarsson PO, Poussette A. 1977 Possible bone-preserving capacity of high-dose intramuscular depot estrogen as compared to orchidectomy in the treatment of patients with prostatic carcinoma. Prostate. 31:193–197.
  35. Eriksson S, Eriksson A, Stege R, Carlström K. 1995 Bone mineral density in patients with prostatic cancer treated with orchidectomy and with estrogens. Calcif Tissue Int. 57:97–99.[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. van Kesteren P, Lips P, Gooren LJG, Asscheman H, Megens J. 1998 Long-term follow-up of bone mineral density and bone metabolism in transsexuals treated with cross-sex hormones. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 48:347–354.[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Marcus R, Leary D, Schneider DL, Shane E, Favus M, Quigley CA. 2000 The contribution of testosterone to skeletal development and maintenance: lessons from the androgen insensitivity syndrome. J Clin Endocirnol Metab. 85:1032–1035.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Ferrini RL, Barrett-Connor E. 1998 Sex hormones and age: a cross-sectional study of testosterone and estradiol and their bioavailable fractions in community-dwelling men. Am J Epidemiol. 147:750–754.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Ongphiphadhanakul B, Rajatanavin R, Chanprasertyothin S, Piaseu N, Chailurkit L. 1998 Serum oestradiol and oestrogen-receptor gene polymorphism are associated with bone mineral density independently of serum testosterone in normal males. Clin Endocrinol. 49:803–809.[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Wishart JM, Need AG, Horowitz M, Morris HA, Nordin BEC. 1995 Effect of age on bone density and bone turnover in men. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 42:141–145.[Medline]
  41. Center JR, Nguyen TV, Sambrook PN, Eisman JA. 1999 Hormonal and biochemical parameters in the determination of osteoporosis in elderly men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 84:3626–3635.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Laet CEDH de, van Hout BA, Burger H, Weel AEAM, Hofman A, Pols HAP. 1998 Hip fracture prediction in elderly men and women: validation in the Rotterdam study. J Bone Miner Res. 13:1587–1593.[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Szulc P, Garnero P, Munoz F, Marchand F, Delmas PD. 1999 Cross-sectional analysis of age-related changes of bone turnover in men: the MINOS study [Abstract F485]. J Bone Miner Res. 14(Suppl 1):S307.
  44. Kusec V, Virdi AS, Prince R, Triffitt JT. 1998 Localization of estrogen receptor-{alpha} in human and rabbit skeletal tissues. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 83:2421–2428.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Nilsson LO, Boman A, Sävendahl L, et al. 1999 Demonstration of estrogen receptor-ß immunoreactivity in human growth plate cartilage. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 84:370–373.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Dong Y, Qiu QQ, Debear J, Lathrop WF, Bertolini DR, Tamburini PP. 1998 17ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases in human bone cells. J Bone Miner Res. 13:1539–1546.[CrossRef][Medline]
  47. Nawata H, Tanaka S, Tanaka S, et al. 1995 Aromatase in bone cell: association with osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 53:165–174.[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. Sasano H, Uzuki M, Sawai T, et al. 1997 Aromatase in human bone tissue. J Bone Miner Res. 12:1416–1423.[CrossRef][Medline]
  49. Schweikert HU, Wolf L, Romalo G. 1995 Oestrogen formation from androstenedione in human bone. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 43:37–42.[Medline]
  50. Tanaka S, Haji M, Nishi Y, Yanase T, Takayanagi R, Nawata H. 1993 Aromatase activity in human osteoblast-like osteosarcoma cell. Calcif Tissue Int. 52:107–109.[CrossRef][Medline]
  51. Scopacasa F, Horowitz M, Wishart JM, Morris HA, Chatterton BE, Need AG. 2000 The relation between bone density, free androgen index, and estradiol in men 60 to 70 years old. Bone. 27:145–149.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
C. Meier, T. V. Nguyen, D. J. Handelsman, C. Schindler, M. M. Kushnir, A. L. Rockwood, A. W. Meikle, J. R. Center, J. A. Eisman, and M. J. Seibel
Endogenous Sex Hormones and Incident Fracture Risk in Older Men: The Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study
Arch Intern Med, January 14, 2008; 168(1): 47 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
A. Bjornerem, L. A. Ahmed, R. M. Joakimsen, G. K R. Berntsen, V. Fonnebo, L. Jorgensen, P. Oian, E. Seeman, and B. Straume
A prospective study of sex steroids, sex hormone-binding globulin, and non-vertebral fractures in women and men: the Tromso Study
Eur. J. Endocrinol., July 1, 2007; 157(1): 119 - 125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
H. A. Fink, S. K. Ewing, K. E. Ensrud, E. Barrett-Connor, B. C. Taylor, J. A. Cauley, E. S. Orwoll, and for the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study Group
Association of Testosterone and Estradiol Deficiency with Osteoporosis and Rapid Bone Loss in Older Men
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2006; 91(10): 3908 - 3915.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
V. J. Wright
Osteoporosis in Men
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., June 1, 2006; 14(6): 347 - 353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
W. A. Bauman, A. M. Spungen, J. Wang, R. N. Pierson Jr., and E. Schwartz
Relationship of fat mass and serum estradiol with lower extremity bone in persons with chronic spinal cord injury
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, June 1, 2006; 290(6): E1098 - E1103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. P. Bilezikian
What's Good for the Goose's Skeleton is Good for the Gander's Skeleton.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2006; 91(4): 1223 - 1225.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Khosla, L. J. Melton III, S. J. Achenbach, A. L. Oberg, and B. L. Riggs
Hormonal and Biochemical Determinants of Trabecular Microstructure at the Ultradistal Radius in Women and Men
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2006; 91(3): 885 - 891.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
V Rochira, A Balestrieri, B Madeo, L Zirilli, A R M Granata, and C Carani
Osteoporosis and male age-related hypogonadism: role of sex steroids on bone (patho)physiology
Eur. J. Endocrinol., February 1, 2006; 154(2): 175 - 185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
J. M. Kaufman and A. Vermeulen
The Decline of Androgen Levels in Elderly Men and Its Clinical and Therapeutic Implications
Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2005; 26(6): 833 - 876.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
J. D. Veldhuis, J. N. Roemmich, E. J. Richmond, A. D. Rogol, J. C. Lovejoy, M. Sheffield-Moore, N. Mauras, and C. Y. Bowers
Endocrine Control of Body Composition in Infancy, Childhood, and Puberty
Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2005; 26(1): 114 - 146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
W. de Ronde, Y. T. van der Schouw, M. Muller, D. E. Grobbee, L. J. G. Gooren, H. A. P. Pols, and F. H. de Jong
Associations of Sex-Hormone-Binding Globulin (SHBG) with Non-SHBG-Bound Levels of Testosterone and Estradiol in Independently Living Men
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2005; 90(1): 157 - 162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. Gennari, R. Nuti, and J. P. Bilezikian
Aromatase Activity and Bone Homeostasis in Men
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2004; 89(12): 5898 - 5907.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
V.-V. Valimaki, H. Alfthan, K. K. Ivaska, E. Loyttyniemi, K. Pettersson, U.-H. Stenman, and M. J. Valimaki
Serum Estradiol, Testosterone, and Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin as Regulators of Peak Bone Mass and Bone Turnover Rate in Young Finnish Men
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2004; 89(8): 3785 - 3789.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
H. W. Goderie-Plomp, M. van der Klift, W. de Ronde, A. Hofman, F. H. de Jong, and H. A. P. Pols
Endogenous Sex Hormones, Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin, and the Risk of Incident Vertebral Fractures in Elderly Men and Women: The Rotterdam Study
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2004; 89(7): 3261 - 3269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. Wang, G. Cunningham, A. Dobs, A. Iranmanesh, A. M. Matsumoto, P. J. Snyder, T. Weber, N. Berman, L. Hull, and R. S. Swerdloff
Long-Term Testosterone Gel (AndroGel) Treatment Maintains Beneficial Effects on Sexual Function and Mood, Lean and Fat Mass, and Bone Mineral Density in Hypogonadal Men
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2004; 89(5): 2085 - 2098.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Khosla, B. L. Riggs, E. J. Atkinson, A. L. Oberg, C. Mavilia, F. Del Monte, L. J. Melton III, and M. L. Brandi
Relationship of Estrogen Receptor Genotypes to Bone Mineral Density and to Rates of Bone Loss in Men
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2004; 89(4): 1808 - 1816.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
A.A. Ionescu and E. Schoon
Osteoporosis in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Eur. Respir. J., November 2, 2003; 22(46_suppl): 64S - 75s.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
E. Seeman
Invited Review: Pathogenesis of osteoporosis
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2003; 95(5): 2142 - 2151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] <