help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zarkesh-Esfahani, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, R. J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zarkesh-Esfahani, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, R. J. M.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 85, No. 9 3383-3390
Copyright © 2000 by The Endocrine Society


Original Studies

High-Dose Growth Hormone Does Not Affect Proinflammatory Cytokine (Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha}, Interleukin-6, and Interferon-{gamma}) Release from Activated Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells or after Minimal to Moderate Surgical Stress1

S. H. Zarkesh-Esfahani, O. Kolstad, R. A. Metcalfe, P. F. Watson, S. Von Laue, S. Walters, A. Revhaug, A. P. Weetman and R. J. M. Ross

Division of Clinical Sciences and SCHARR (S.W.), Sheffield University, Sheffield, United Kingdom S5 7AU; and Tromso University (O.K., A.R.), Tromso, Norway

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Richard J. M. Ross, Clinical Sciences, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom S5 7AU. E-mail: r.j.ross{at}sheffield.ac.uk


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
High-dose GH therapy, with GH doses 10–20 times the normal replacement dose for GH-deficient adults, has been used as an anti-catabolic agent in a number of different patient groups. A recent study, however, has shown an increase in mortality in critically ill patients treated with high-dose GH. The increased mortality was associated with multiorgan failure, septic shock, and uncontrolled infection, suggesting that GH may have altered the immune response. The GH receptor and GH are both expressed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs); thus, GH could act as either an endocrine or an autocrine modulator of the immune response. We have examined the hypothesis that high-dose GH therapy may induce proinflammatory cytokines, which are implicated in septic shock. To do this we measured cytokine production by PBMCs incubated in conditions that simulated high-dose GH therapy, and we measured cytokine levels in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy who were randomized to receive either high-dose GH therapy (13 IU/m2·day) or placebo.

To confirm the biological activity of GH in our cell culture system we used a Stat5 functional assay. In this assay GH induced a bell-shaped curve, with a maximal response at GH levels between 100-1000 ng/mL. PBMCs from healthy volunteers were incubated with GH in doses from 1–1000 ng/mL for 6–72 h under resting conditions and after activation with endotoxin and the mixed lymphocyte reaction. Studies were repeated with PBMCs from six individuals using a GH dose of 100 ng/mL (the level of GH found after high-dose GH therapy) and an endotoxin dose that gave a submaximal response (0.01 ng/mL). GH had no effect on cell proliferation or the production of tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} (TNF{alpha}), interleukin-6 (IL-6), or interferon-{gamma} (IFN{gamma}). In patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy there was a time-related effect of surgery on cytokine levels. There was a rise in IL-6 and a fall in TNF{alpha} at 24 h after surgery; however, high-dose GH therapy had no effect on the cytokine response. We considered the possibility that endogenous GH production by PBMCs could influence the cytokine response in activated PBMCs; however, incubation of PBMCs in the presence of the GH receptor antagonist, B2036, had no effect on TNF{alpha}, IL-6, or IFN{gamma} production by PBMCs in either the mixed lymphocyte reaction or when activated by endotoxin.

These results suggest that high-dose GH therapy does not alter the proinflammatory cytokine response to surgery or endotoxin. The results do not exclude an effect of GH on the immune response, but they suggest that the mortality seen in critically ill patients may be due to factors other than immune modulation.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
HIGH-DOSE GH has been used as an anticatabolic agent in a number of conditions, including patients who have undergone surgery or suffered severe burns (1). A recent disturbing report suggests that high-dose GH treatment of critically ill patients was directly related to an increased mortality in this patient group (2). Multiple organ failure, septic shock, and uncontrolled infections were the main causes of death, suggesting the possibility that GH modulated the immune response. In animal experiments there is evidence to support the concept that in the presence of sepsis, excess GH may be a disadvantage. In septic rodents and pigs, GH potentiates the biological activities of endotoxin and has an unfavorable effect on carbohydrate metabolism (3, 4).

The GH receptor (GHR) is a member of the type 1 cytokine receptor family and is expressed on human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) (5). In healthy individuals most circulating B cells and monocytes are GHR positive, and there is low expression in T cells (6). GH-deficient humans show no obvious immune deficit (5); however, GH is locally produced by PBMCs (7), and therefore a pituitary deficiency may not result in immune deficiency (5).

The role of GH in immune regulation of humans is as yet undefined (8), and studies of GH administration have given varying results. GH-deficient children had basal tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} (TNF{alpha}) levels similar to controls, but GH administration caused an acute rise in TNF{alpha} levels (9). In contrast, in GH-deficient adults, basal TNF{alpha} levels were high and fell after prolonged GH administration (10). In human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patients treated with GH there was no significant change in immune function (11), and in surgical patients treated with GH there was no change in cytokine levels (12); however, GH treatment of normal human PBMCs reduced the TNF{alpha} and interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß) production in response to endotoxin (13).

The use of GH as an anticatabolic agent and the observation that high-dose GH treatment is associated with an increased mortality due to sepsis in critically ill patients (2) emphasize the importance of investigating the action of GH on the immune system. In this study we asked the specific question of whether high-dose GH treatment promotes proinflammatory cytokine production from resting and activated human PBMCs either in culture or in patients undergoing surgical stress.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cell culture

Venous blood samples (50 mL) were collected from healthy male adults (aged 20–45 yr). PBMCs were isolated by Lymphoprep, washed twice in normal saline and once in medium, and suspended in medium [RPMI 1640 supplemented with L-glutamine (2 mmol/L), penicillin/streptomycin (10 mg/mL), and 2% heat-inactivated normal human AB serum] to a density of 1 x 106/mL. For the cytokine production assay 2 mL cell suspension were transferred to each well of a 24-well plate, and for the proliferation assay 200 µL were transferred to each well of a 96-well plate. The cells were treated with different concentrations of endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide from Escherichia coli stereotype 0111:B4, Sigma, St. Louis, MO), Phytohemagglutinin (PHA; Sigma), GH (Genotropin, recombinant human GH, Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden), or GH antagonist B2036 (supplied by William Bennett, Sensus Drug Development Corp., Austin, TX). Incubations were performed in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. After 72-h incubation, media were centrifuged for 10 min. Cells were discarded, and the supernatants were stored at -70 C until assay. Mixed lymphocyte reactions (MLR; allostimulation) were set up using PBMCs from a responder and the same number of allogeneic irradiated (30 Gy) PBMCs from another person as stimulator. For proliferation assays 200 µL of 1 x 106/mL PBMCs were incubated for 5 days in round bottomed microplates, either unstimulated or stimulated with endotoxin, GH, or GH antagonist. For allostimulation, 100 µL PBMC were incubated with 100 µL irradiated PBMC from another person (cell ratio, 1:1). During the last 24 h, 0.1 mCi [3H]thymidine was added, and proliferation assessed from the [3H]thymidine incorporation as counts per min. All materials were screened and were negative for endotoxin.

Assays

Cytokines were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [TNF{alpha}; R&D Systems, Oxon, UK; interferon-{gamma} (IFN{gamma}): Diaclone Research Kits, Besancon, France; IL-6: R&D Systems]; the intraassay CVs were 8.7%, 0.59%, and 4.4%, respectively. GH was measured by immunoradiometric assay (Medix Biochemica, Kauniainen, Finland).

GH treatment in vivo

Nineteen female patients [aged 19–66 yr (4 postmenopause), body mass index, 22–33 kg/m2] underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The study design was placebo controlled, randomized, and double blind. Patients received either 13 IU/m2·day rhGH (Genotropin, recombinant human growth hormone, Pharmacia) or placebo (0.9% NaCl) at 0800 h on the day of surgery (before surgery) and then daily for 3 consecutive days. Both groups of patients received standardized total parenteral nutrition containing glutamine. Venous blood samples were collected the day before surgery and on the first, second, and third postoperative days at 1200 h. The protocol was approved by the ethical board of the Clinical Research Center at Tromso University Hospital, and the patients gave informed consent.

Functional assay

Stable clones expressing the full-length human GHR were generated in 293 cells (human kidney embryonal cell line) as previously described (14).Transcription assays were performed in the stable clone 293 cells expressing the GHR and transiently transfected with a reporter construct containing a Stat5-binding element fused to a minimal TK promoter and luciferase. Luciferase activity was measured as previously reported (15).

Statistics

The paired t test was used to compare cytokine levels in media from PBMCs and proliferation of cells. For analysis of serum levels in patients undergoing surgery, repeated measures ANOVA was used.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In vitro dose response of Stat5-luciferase reporter to GH (Fig. 1aGo)

To confirm the biological activity of our GH preparation in culture and to determine whether a GH dose response was seen with physiological levels of GH, we used a previously established functional assay (15). Essentially 293 cells stably expressing the human GHR and transiently transfected with a Stat5-luciferase reporter were tested with GH doses between 1–100,000 ng/mL culture medium (Fig. 1aGo). There was a dose response to GH at GH doses between 1–100 ng/mL, with GH levels of 100-1000 ng/mL giving a maximal response, and there was a bell-shaped shaped curve, with GH doses greater than 1000 ng/mL suppressing the Stat5 response.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. a, Dose response of luciferase activity to GH stimulation in 293 cells stably expressing the GHR transiently transfected with a Stat5-luciferase reporter construct and stimulated with varying doses of GH for 24 h. Luciferase activity is expressed as fold induction of GH-stimulated cells over unstimulated cells. Luciferase activity was corrected for the ß-galactosidase level, which was used as a transfection control. b, Dose response for the production of IL-6 by PBMCs incubated with increasing doses of endotoxin for 24 h.

 
Dose response of IL-6 production from PBMCs exposed to endotoxin (Fig. 1bGo)

Before examining the effect of GH on PBMCs activated by endotoxin, we performed a dose response to endotoxin using doses of 0.0001–100 ng/mL. Endotoxin induced production of IL-6 at doses as low as 0.001 ng/mL, and a maximal response was seen with an endotoxin dose of 0.1 ng/mL. Thus, for subsequent experiments a submaximal dose of endotoxin was used (0.01 ng/mL medium).

Effect of GH on resting PBMCs (Figs. 2Go and 3Go)

Resting PBMCs were incubated with and without GH at varying doses between 1–1000 ng/mL for 3 days, and the medium was then assayed for cytokines (Fig. 2aGo). Medium from cells incubated without GH showed very low levels of TNF{alpha}, IL-6, and IFN{gamma}, and there was no induction of the cytokines with GH doses up to 1000 ng/mL. Endotoxin (0.01 ng/mL) and PHA (5 µg/mL) induced TNF{alpha} (20- and 292-fold), IL-6 (36- and 807-fold), and IFN{gamma} (1.2- and 762-fold). Medium from cells incubated with GH was also sampled at 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h after the start of the GH incubation, and no change in cytokine level was found (data not shown). Similarly, there was no change in cell proliferation in response to increasing doses of GH, although a clear effect was seen in response to endotoxin and PHA (Fig. 2bGo). PBMCs from six separate individuals were then incubated with a GH dose (100 ng/mL) that we had previously shown to have a maximal effect on GH activation of Stat5 and was similar to the GH level found in surgical patients after GH treatment (see below). Again, GH had no effect on production of TNF{alpha}, IL-6, or IFN{gamma} (Fig. 3aGo).



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. a, Mean (±SEM) levels of TNF{alpha}, IFN{gamma}, and IL-6 in medium from PBMCs from two normal subjects incubated with varying doses of GH, endotoxin (0.01 ng/mL) and PHA (5 µg/mL) for 3 days. $, IL-6 values are expressed at 10-1 to fit on the same scale as the other cytokines. *, P < 0.01 vs. unstimulated cells. b, Cell proliferation assay. Mean (±SEM) level of thymidine incorporation by PBMCs from two normal subjects incubated with varying doses of GH, endotoxin (0.01 ng/mL) and PHA (5 µg/mL) for 5 days. *, P < 0.01 vs unstimulated cells.

 


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. a, Mean (±SEM) levels of TNF{alpha}, IFN{gamma}, and IL-6 in the culture medium of PBMC from six healthy individuals incubated in the absence or presence of GH (100 ng/mL) and/or endotoxin (0.01 ng/mL). b, Mean (±SEM) levels of TNF{alpha}, IFN{gamma}, and IL-6 in cells in the absence or presence GH (100 ng/mL) in a MLR using PBMCs as responders (n = 6 subjects) and MHC-mismatched PBMCs as stimulator cells.

 
Effect of GH on PBMCs exposed to endotoxin (Fig. 3aGo)

Using a dose of endotoxin that induced a submaximal IL-6 response (0.01 ng/mL) and a dose of GH known to induce a maximal response (100 ng/mL), PBMCs from six separate individuals were incubated with and without GH and endotoxin, alone or in combination. GH had no effect on the production of TNF{alpha}, IL-6, and IFN{gamma} in either the absence or presence of endotoxin.

Effect of GH on PBMCs activated by MLR (Fig. 3bGo)

PBMCs were activated by coculture with MHC-incompatible (allogeneic) stimulator cells (MLR) and were incubated with and without GH. The effects of GH were studied in experiments lasting for 1–5 days in six separate individuals with doses of GH ranging from 1–1000 ng/mL. GH had no effect on the MLR induction of TNF{alpha}, IL-6, and IFN{gamma}. MLR augmented PBMC proliferation, but this was not altered by GH (PBMCs only, 923 ± 178; MLR only, 3867 ± 372; MLR plus GH, 3594 ± 532 cpm).

The GH antagonist, B2036 (Fig. 4Go)

In case endogenous production of GH was masking any GH action, experiments were repeated with a dose of GH antagonist (B2036, 1000 ng/mL) known to completely block receptor signaling (14). The GH antagonist had no effect on cytokine production in either resting PBMCs or cells activated by incubation with endotoxin.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Mean (±SEM) levels of TNF{alpha}, IFN{gamma}, and IL-6 in the culture medium of PBMC or MLR from four healthy individuals incubated in the absence or presence of the GH antagonist B2036 (1000 ng/mL) and/or endotoxin (0.01 ng/mL).

 
Cytokine response to surgical stress (Fig. 5Go)

Data was collected over 4 days for the 19 patients (10 GH and 9 placebo) who underwent laparascopic cholecystectomy. There was no effect of GH on any of the cytokine levels despite GH levels of 116 ± 22 ng/mL in the GH group the day after surgery and 1.7 ± 0.4 ng/mL in the placebo group. However, there was statistical evidence of a time effect after surgery for all cytokines (IL-6, P < 0.001; TNF{alpha}, P < 0.001). The IL-6 and TNF{alpha} responses followed a quadratic shape.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. IL-6 (a), and TNF{alpha} (b) levels in patients treated with GH or placebo on the day before treatment and surgery (day -1) and for 3 days after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (days 1, 2, and 3).

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We have examined in detail the effect of high-dose GH on PBMCs both in vitro and in vivo. GH had no effect on either resting or activated PBMC proliferation or their production of TNF{alpha}, IL-6, and IFN{gamma}. Similarly, high-dose GH treatment of patients undergoing surgical stress had no effect on the surgically induced changes in TNF{alpha} and IL-6. In these studies we were very careful in our choice of GH dose and controls. In simultaneous experiments we showed that GH, at the doses used, was biologically active in a functional assay of Stat5 induction, and that a GH level of 100 ng/mL had a maximal effect on Stat5 induction (the dose response was a bell-shaped curve, as it is now well recognized that high-doses of GH block receptor signaling) (16). All of the PBMC incubations had controls with endotoxin or PHA. PBMCs were very sensitive to incubation with endotoxin, and a level of 0.01 ng/mL induced a clear response of cell proliferation and cytokine production. The doses of GH used in the PBMC incubations were chosen to reflect those found in patients treated with high-dose GH. In the surgical patients a GH level of 116 ± 22 ng/mL (mean ± SEM) was found after GH treatment with 13 IU/m2·day GH. This dose of GH is 10–20 times the normal dose for GH replacement in adults and is similar to the dose of GH used in many studies of its anticatabolic therapy (17), including the recent study in critically ill patients (2). Our results, therefore, suggest that high-dose GH therapy is unlikely to induce PBMC proliferation or alter the production of TNF{alpha}, IL-6, or IFN{gamma}. We chose to study these cytokines because they are proinflammatory, they modulate the activation of macrophages, and they are implicated in inducing septic shock and multiple organ failure (18).

The changes in cytokine levels following surgery are determined by a number of factors, including the type of surgery and anesthetic. For example, different changes are seen in patients undergoing open vs. laparoscopic cholecystectomy (19). We chose to study patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy because these patients represent a relatively homogenous group with, therefore, a more reproducible physiological response in whom we would be likely to detect any influence of GH treatment. The surgery had a relatively minor effect on cytokine production, inducing a rise in IL-6 levels at 24 h and a fall in TNF{alpha} at 24 h. These results are broadly similar to previous observations in this patient group (19, 20), although in one study TNF{alpha} levels were higher at 24 h (21). The finding that GH had no effect on the cytokine response to surgery is consistent with results in another patient group. Patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair were treated with high-dose GH or placebo for 6 days before surgery, and there was no difference in their IL-6 rise after surgery (12). Body mass index and estrogen status may affect cytokine levels; however, as cytokine measurements were made within the same patient before and after surgery, these variables would be unlikely to have influenced our results.

Our results do not preclude the possibility that high-dose GH has a detrimental effect on another aspect of the immune system that we have not studied and that could be implicated in the increase in mortality seen in critically ill patients (2). In addition, critically ill patients may well have other confounding factors, such as sepsis or drugs, which may interact with GH and the immune system. Previous reports, however, have generally been consistent with GH having a beneficial effect on the immune response. In patients with moderately advanced HIV infection, high-dose GH therapy was reasonably well tolerated, and there was a modest improvement in HIV-specific immune function (11). In patients undergoing cholecystectomy, high-dose GH treatment was associated with improved cell-mediated immunity and a reduced incidence of postoperative wound infection (22), although in this study the incidence of infection was surprisingly high in the placebo-treated group. Consistent with GH not influencing the immune response was the lack of effect GH had on septic episodes in children with burns (23) or on sepsis score in patients with sepsis (24). Overall, our results and the above studies suggest that the increase in mortality seen in septic animals (3, 4) and critically ill humans (2) treated with GH is not related to an effect of GH on the inflammatory response. It seems likely that the detrimental effect of GH in the presence of sepsis may well be associated with changes in the metabolic response (4).

The effects of GH on immune function in animal models of inflammation and in vitro cultures of mononuclear cells have been varied. This probably relates to experimental conditions, as in a number of studies doses of GH and endotoxin were used that greatly exceeded those found in either normal subjects or septic patients, in whom high-dose GH treatment has been used. GH has been shown to prime macrophages (25) and enhance the production of TNF{alpha} in response to endotoxin (26), but in calves GH reduced the TNF{alpha} response to endotoxin (27). GH enhanced cytokine responses and improved the survival of septic mice (28), in contrast to the previously discussed increase in mortality seen in other animal models (4). In studies of splenic lymphocytes GH at an extremely high-dose (10,000 ng/mL) increased cell proliferation and production of IFN{gamma} in mice with burn injury (29), and GH at a very low dose (0.1 ng/mL) reduced the IFN{gamma} response to treatment with staphylococcal A toxin (30), but increased the response to a very high-dose of lipopolysaccharide (500 ng/mL) (31). In human PBMCs a very high-dose of GH (500 ng/mL) inhibited the production of TNF{alpha} in response to a very high-dose of endotoxin (10 ng/mL). In our studies we used GH concentrations (100 ng/mL) that are encountered in patients receiving high-dose GH treatment and levels of endotoxin that induced a submaximal response. Under these conditions GH had no effect on cytokine production or cell proliferation. The studies were also repeated using another condition of priming and activating PBMCs, the MLR; again, under these conditions there was no effect of GH.

In view of the observation that normal replacement doses of GH in GH-deficient children (9) increased TNF{alpha} and decreased TNF{alpha} levels in adults (10), we considered the possibility that low levels of endogenous GH produced by PBMCs (7) could alter cytokine responses. To test this hypothesis we used the recently synthesized GHR antagonist, B2036. This GH mutant blocks GH-stimulated cell proliferation (16, 32, 33, 34, 35) and GH signaling (14). At doses that completely block signaling (14), the antagonist had no effect on either basal or activated PBMC cytokine production or proliferation.

In conclusion, we examined whether high-dose GH therapy induces proinflammatory cytokines and PBMC proliferation. In cell culture, under conditions that simulate high-dose GH therapy, GH had no effect on cytokine production of resting or activated PBMC. Similarly, GH had no effect on the cytokine response to surgery. These studies do not exclude the possibility that the adverse effect of GH in critically ill patients is due to a change in the immune response, but suggest that this detrimental action of GH is not due to activation of proinflammatory cytokines.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by Serono Laboratories, Inc., the Wellcome Trust, PPP Health Care, and Trent Regional Research Schemes. Back

Received January 8, 2000.

Revised May 12, 2000.

Accepted June 7, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Wilmore DW. 1991 Catabolic illness. Strategies for enhancing recovery. N Engl J Med. 325:695–702.[Abstract]
  2. Takala J, Ruokonen E, Webster NR, et al. 1999 Increased mortality associated with growth hormone treatment in critically adults. N Engl J Med. 341:785–792.
  3. Liao W, Rudling M, Angelin B. 1996 Growth hormone potentiates the in vivo biological activities of endotoxin in the rat. Eur J Clin Invest. 26:254–258.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Balteskard L, Unneberg K, Mjaaland M, Sager G, Jenssen TG, Revhaug A. 1998 Treatment with growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-1 in septicemia: effects on carbohydrate metabolism. Eur Surg Res. 30:79–94.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Clark R. 1997 The somatogenic hormones and insulin-like growth factor-1: stimulators of lymphopoiesis and immune function. Endocr Rev. 18:157–179.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Bresson JL, Jeay S, Gagnerault MC, et al. 1999 Growth hormone (GH) and prolactin receptors in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells: relation with age and GH-binding protein. Endocrinology. 140:3203–3209.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Weigent DA, Baxter JB, Wear WE, Smith LR, Bost KL, Blalock JE. 1988 Production of immunoreactive growth hormone by mononuclear leukocytes. FASEB J. 2:2812–2818.[Abstract]
  8. Horseman ND, Yu-Lee LY. 1994 Transcriptional regulation by the helix bundle peptide hormones: growth hormone, prolactin, and hematopoietic cytokines. Endocr Rev. 15:627–649.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Bozzola M, De Amici M, Zecca M, Schimpff RM, Rapaport R. 1998 Modulating effect of human growth hormone on tumour necrosis factor-{alpha} and interleukin-1ß. Eur J Endocrinol. 138:640–643.[Abstract]
  10. Serri O, St-Jacques P, Sartippour M, Renier G. 1999 Alterations of monocyte function in patients with growth hormone (GH) deficiency: effect of substitutive GH therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 84:58–63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Nguyen BY, Clerici M, Venzon DJ, et al. 1998 Pilot study of the immunologic effects of recombinant human growth hormone and recombinant insulin-like growth factor in HIV-infected patients. AIDS. 12:895–904.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Mealy K, Barry M, O’Mahony L, et al. 1998 Effects of human recombinant growth hormone (rhGH) on inflammatory responses in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Intensive Care Med. 24:128–131.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Kappel M, Hansen MB, Diamant M, Pedersen BK. 1994 In vitro effects of human growth hormone on the proliferative responses and cytokine production of blood mononuclear cells. Horm Metab Res. 26:612–614.[Medline]
  14. Maamra M, Finidori J, Von Laue S, et al. 1999 Studies with a growth hormone antagonist and dual-fluorescent confocal microscopy demonstrate that the full-length human growth hormone receptor, but not the truncated isoform, is very rapidly internalized independent of Jak2-Stat5 signaling. J Biol Chem. 274:14791–14798.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Ross RJ, Esposito N, Shen XY, et al. 1997 A short isoform of the human growth hormone receptor functions as a dominant negative inhibitor of the full-length receptor and generates large amounts of binding protein. Mol Endocrinol. 11:265–273.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Fuh G, Cunningham BC, Fukunaga R, Nagata S, Goeddel DV, Wells JA. 1992 Rational design of potent antagonists to the human growth hormone receptor. Science. 256:1677–1680.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Jenkins RC, Ross RJ. 1996 Growth hormone therapy for protein catabolism. Q J Med. 89:813–819.[Free Full Text]
  18. Male D. 1993 Cytokines and cytokine receptors, 2nd Ed. Oxford: IRL Press.
  19. Reber PU, Andren S, Schmied B, Buchler MW. 1998 Cytokines in surgical trauma: cholecystectomy as an example. Digest Surg. 15:92–101.
  20. Bellon JM, Manzano L, Larrad A, Honduvilla GN, Bujan J, Alvarez-Mon M. 1998 Endocrine and immune response to injury after open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Int Surg. 83:24–27.[Medline]
  21. Bellon JM, Manzano L, Bernardos L, et al. 1997 Cytokine levels after open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eur Surg Res. 29:27–34.[Medline]
  22. Vara-Thorbeck R, Guerrero JA, Rosell J, Ruiz-Requena E, Capitan JM. 1993 Exogenous growth hormone: effects on the catabolic response to surgically produced acute stress and on postoperative immune function. World J Surg. 17:530–537.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Herndon DN, Barrow RE, Kunkel KR, Broemeling L, Rutan RL. 1990 Effects of recombinant human growth hormone on donor-site healing in severely burned children. Ann Surgery. 212:424–429.[Medline]
  24. Gottardis M, Benzer A, Koller W, Luger TJ, Puhringer F, Hackl J. 1991 Improvement of septic syndrome after administration of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH)? J Trauma-Injury Infect Crit Care. 31:81–86.
  25. Warwick-Davies J, Lowrie DB, Cole PJ. 1995 Growth hormone is a human macrophage activating factor. Priming of human monocytes for enhanced release of H2O2. J Immunol. 154:1909–1918.[Abstract]
  26. Edwards CK, Lorence RM, Dunham DM, et al. 1991 Hypophysectomy inhibits the synthesis of tumor necrosis factor alpha by rat macrophages: partial restoration by exogenous growth hormone or interferon gamma. Endocrinology. 128:989–986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Elsasser TH, Fayer R, Rumsey TS, Hartnell GF. 1994 Recombinant bovine somatotropin blunts plasma tumor necrosis factor-{alpha}, cortisol, and thromboxane-B2 responses to endotoxin in vivo. Endocrinology. 134:1082–1088.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Inoue T, Saito H, Fukushima R, et al. 1995 Growth hormone and insulinlike growth factor I enhance host defense in a murine sepsis model. Arch Surg. 130:1115–1122.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Takagi K, Suzuki F, Barrow RE, Wolf SE, Herndon DN. 1998 Recombinant human growth hormone modulates Th1 and Th2 cytokine response in burned mice. Ann Surg. 228:106–111.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Galdiero M, Vitiello M, Scarfogliero P, Sommese L. 1997 Growth hormone release of interleukin-1 alpha, interferon-gamma and interleukin-4 from murine splenocytes stimulated with staphylococcal protein A, toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 and streptococcal lysin S. Eur Cytokine Network. 8:83–90.[Medline]
  31. Sommese L, Donnarumma G, de l’Ero C, Marcatili A, Vitiello M, Galdiero. 1996 Growth hormone modulates IL-{alpha} and IFN-{gamma} release by murine splenocytes activated by LPS or porins of Salmonella typhimurium. J Med Microbiol. 45:40–47.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Chen WY, Wight DC, Wagner TE, Kopchick JJ. 1990 Expression of a mutated bovine growth hormone gene suppresses growth of transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 87:5061–5065.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Chen WY, Wight DC, Mehta BV, Wagner TE, Kopchick JJ. 1991 Glycine 119 of bovine growth hormone is critical for growth-promoting activity. Mol Endocrinol. 5:1845–1852.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Chen WY, White ME, Wagner TE, Kopchick JJ. 1991 Functional antagonism between endogenous mouse growth hormone (GH) and a GH analog results in dwarf transgenic mice. Endocrinology. 129:1402–1408.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Chen WY, Chen NY, Yun J, Wagner TE, Kopchick JJ. 1994 In vitro and in vivo studies of antagonistic effects of human growth hormone analogs [published erratum appears in J Biol Chem 1994 Aug 12;269(32):20806]. J Biol Chem. 269:15892–15897.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
T. K. Hansen, S. Fisker, R. Dall, T. Ledet, J. O. L. Jorgensen, and L. M. Rasmussen
Growth Hormone Increases Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule 1 Expression: in Vivo and in Vitro Evidence
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2004; 89(2): 909 - 916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
D. Mesotten, G. Van den Berghe, C. Liddle, S. Coulter, F. McDougall, R. C. Baxter, and P. J. D. Delhanty
Growth Hormone Modulation of the Rat Hepatic Bile Transporter System in Endotoxin-Induced Cholestasis
Endocrinology, September 1, 2003; 144(9): 4008 - 4017.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
H. Zarkesh-Esfahani, G. Pockley, R. A. Metcalfe, M. Bidlingmaier, Z. Wu, A. Ajami, A. P. Weetman, C. J. Strasburger, and R. J. M. Ross
High-Dose Leptin Activates Human Leukocytes Via Receptor Expression on Monocytes
J. Immunol., October 15, 2001; 167(8): 4593 - 4599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zarkesh-Esfahani, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, R. J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zarkesh-Esfahani, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, R. J. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals