help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoeldtke, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lernmark, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoeldtke, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lernmark, A.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 85, No. 9 3297-3308
Copyright © 2000 by The Endocrine Society


Original Studies

Antibodies to Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase and Peripheral Nerve Function in Type 1 Diabetes1

Robert D. Hoeldtke, Kimberly D. Bryner, Gerald R. Hobbs, Gabriella G. Horvath, Jack E. Riggs, Ian Christie, Gary Ganser, Santica M. Marcovina and Ake Lernmark

Departments of Medicine (R.D.H., K.D.B., G.G.H.), Community Medicine and Statistics (G.R.H.), Neurology (J.E.R.), and Mathematics (I.C., G.G.), West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506-9159; and Department of Medicine (S.M.M., A.L.), University of Washington, Seattle Washington 98195-7710

Address correspondence and requests for reprints to: Robert D. Hoeldtke, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Medicine, West Virginia University Medical School, P.O. Box 9159, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506-9159. E-mail: rhoeldtke{at}hsc.wvu.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Autoimmune mechanisms have been implicated in the pathophysiology of diabetic neuropathy. We studied the association between glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65) and islet cell (IA-2) autoantibodies as well as autoantibodies to the autonomic nervous system and peripheral nerve function in recent onset type 1 diabetes. Thirty-seven patients (27 females and 10 males) enrolled 2–22 months after diagnosis. Humoral factors, glycemic control, and peripheral nerve function were measured annually for 3 yr.

Patients with high GAD65Ab had worse glycemic control and higher insulin requirements. Patients with high GAD65Ab had slower motor nerve conduction velocities in the median, ulnar, and peroneal nerves (P < 0.025 for each nerve). The mean motor nerve conduction velocity Z scores at the time of the third evaluation was 0.341 ± 0.25 for the low GAD65Ab patients and -0.600 ± 0.25 for the high GAD65Ab patients (P < 0.01). Similar differences between the low and high GAD65Ab groups were observed for F wave latencies, thermal threshold detection, and cardiovascular autonomic function. The composite peripheral nerve function Z scores in the low GAD65Ab patients were 0.62 ± 11, 0.71 ± 0.19, and 0.21 ± 0.14 at the first, second, and third evaluations, significantly different from those in the high GAD65Ab patients in whom they were -0.35 ± 0.15, -0.46 ± 0.18, and -0.42 ± 0.16 (P < 0.001).

In summary, GAD65Ab in patients with recent onset type 1 diabetes are associated with worse glycemic control and slightly worse peripheral nerve function. Although the latter remained within normal limits and none of the patients had clinical neuropathy, the GAD65Ab-related differences in composite peripheral nerve function were highly significant (P < 0.001) and could not be attributed to GAD65Ab-related differences in glycemic control.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
AUTOIMMUNE MECHANISMS have been implicated in the pathophysiology of diabetic neuropathy. Lymphocytic infiltrates have been observed in the sympathetic ganglia of patients with diabetic autonomic neuropathy (1), and antibodies directed against the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system and adrenal medulla have been documented (2, 3). In addition, Histocompatibility leucocyte antigen (HLA) haplotypes (DR3/4) associated with enhanced susceptibility to autoimmune-mediated islet cell destruction have similarly been linked to the presence of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (4). These observations have led to the theory that the immunological mechanisms that cause type 1 diabetes may also play a role in the pathogenesis of neuropathy. Accordingly, Kaufman et al. (5) reported that antibodies against the smaller isoform of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65Ab), a critical ß cell autoantigen, correlated with the presence of neuropathy in patients with chronic diabetes. Other investigators, however, have failed to confirm associations between GAD65Ab, or antibodies against the autonomic nervous system, and peripheral nerve dysfunction (6, 7). These were all cross-sectional studies of patients with long-standing diabetes, many of whom had overt neuropathy as well as other complications. Although GAD65Ab persists for decades in some patients with type 1 diabetes, autoimmune-mediated inflammatory processes and tissue destruction may be a transient phenomena occurring only before and during the first few years after the diagnosis of type 1 diabetes. Thus, studies of patients with long-standing diabetes may have failed to detect effects of GAD65Ab and other humoral factors on peripheral nerve function early in the disease. We tested for this by making serial measurements of GAD65Ab, IA-2Ab, antibodies to the autonomic nervous system, and peripheral nerve function during the early years of type 1 diabetes.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients

Thirty-seven patients (10 males and 27 females) with type 1 diabetes enrolled 2–22 months after diagnosis in a longitudinal study of peripheral nerve function. Patients with symptoms of autonomic or somatosensory neuropathy, other systemic illnesses, a history of alcoholism, or psychiatric disease were excluded. Patients who needed to take vasodilator or other drugs that might interfere with autonomic function testing were also excluded. All patients were taught home glucose monitoring and instructed to adjust their insulin dose as necessary to maintain optimal glycemic control. Thirty-six of the patients underwent three annual evaluations; one patient withdrew from the study after the second year. The time interval between evaluations was 1 yr for most patients. Delays in scheduling prolonged the study in four patients, but the time interval between the first and third evaluation was always less than 3 yr.

Autonomic function tests and quantitative sensory testing were also performed in 41 age- and sex-matched controls to provide a basis of comparison with the diabetic patients. Nerve conduction velocity measurements and related electrodiagnostic studies were not performed in the controls because the limits of normality were established.

The research protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of West Virginia University Hospital, and informed consent was obtained from the participants.

Annual evaluations

The diabetic patients were admitted to a bed designated for research at West Virginia University Hospital to control their dietary intake, activity, and glucose prior to and during the neurological testing. Glucose was monitored before each meal and snack and at 0300 h, and insulin adjustments were made, as needed. Patients were administered a weight-maintaining diet containing 130 meq sodium daily. Caffeine, aspirin, and cigarette smoking were not allowed on the morning of the tests because of possible effects on autonomic function. The control subjects were also admitted to the hospital, administered the same diet, and subjected to the same restrictions.

Large fiber somatosensory function

Nerve conduction studies were performed with a TD-20 TECCA electromyograph (TECCA Corp., Pleasantville, NY). Skin temperature was measured and maintained above 31 C. Motor nerve conduction velocities, compound action potentials, distal latencies, and F wave latencies were measured in the median, ulnar, and peroneal nerves. Sensory nerve amplitudes and latencies were measured in the median, ulnar, and sural nerves.

Cardiovascular autonomic function

Beat to beat variation with deep breathing. Patients were studied in the supine posture after relaxing comfortably for at least 10 min. Heart rate was monitored electrocardiographically while they breathed slowly (5 sec inspiration/5 sec expiration) as deeply as possible for 5 min. The difference between the maximum and minimum instantaneous heart rates (max-min) reflects the integrity of the parasympathetic innervation of the heart (8). In addition, vector analysis of the instantaneous heart rate was performed, and the mean circular resultant was determined. This alternative index of heart rate variability minimizes error introduced by variation in intrinsic heart rate or ectopic cardiac beats (9).

Heart rate response to the valsalva maneuver. The heart rate was monitored electrocardiographically while the patients were supine and instructed to expire into a sphygmomanometer until a pressure of 40 mm Hg was maintained for 20 sec. The Valsalva ratio was calculated by dividing the maximal instantaneous heart rate during the maneuver by the minimal heart rate observed after release. The test was performed twice, and the average result was calculated. A normal response (ratio greater than 1.15) indicates that the baroreceptor reflex and the efferent limb of the sympathetic nervous system are intact.

Power spectral analysis. Instantaneous heart rate was measured with a Hokanson electrocardiograph monitor, which allows each R-R interval to be recorded into a computer program (DE Hokanson Inc., Bellevue, WA). Rhythm strips were run simultaneously to exclude premature contractions and other rhythm disturbances. The R-R interval data file was then interpolated and averaged, and power spectral analysis was performed using the Fast Fourier Transform (10). Respiration was monitored simultaneously with a thermistor so that spurious low frequency spectra resulting from slow breathing or sighing could be eliminated. High-frequency spectra (0.15–0.40 Hz) indicate parasympathetic cardiac innervation, whereas intermediate frequency spectra (0.04–0.15 Hz) were interpreted to signify predominately sympathetic modulation.

Small fiber somatosensory function. Quantitative sensory testing was used to assess small and thinly myelinated A {delta} fibers, which convey cold sensation, and C fibers, which convey heat (11). The hot and cold stimuli were applied to the dorsal aspect of the feet and the wrist, and participants were asked to distinguish between progressively small thermal stimuli until they were no longer able to detect the change in temperature. Specific thermal thresholds were then determined by a microprocessor-controlled forced choice technique (Neurolink, East Lyme, CT). Thresholds were determined on two separate days, and the average performance was calculated for each of the four parameters of interest (heat threshold feet, cold feet, heat wrist, and cold wrist).

Biochemical measurements

Glycosylated hemoglobin. Glycosylated hemoglobin (hemoglobin A1) was measured by agar gel electrophoresis one to four times a year (12). The reference range for the nondiabetic population was 4.7–7.3%.

GAD65Ab. GAD65Ab was measured in serum samples frozen at -80 C and coded before the analysis in a radiobinding immunoassay (13, 14). Briefly, in the assay, the 35S-GAD65 was produced in an in vitro-coupled transcription and translation system with SP6 RNA polymerase and nuclease treated rabbit reticulocyte lysate (Promega, Madison, WI). In each analysis, 20,000 cpm and trichloroacetic acid precipitable 35S-GAD65, in triplicate, was diluted in 60 µL immunoprecipitation buffer [20 mM Tris, 150 mM NaC1, 0.15% (v/v) Tween 20, 0.1% (w/v) aprotinin, 10 mM benzamidine, and 0.1% (w/v) BSA (pH 7.4)] before the addition of 2.5 µL human serum (final serum dilution, 1:25). Free 35S-GAD65 was separated from the antibody-bound tracer by protein A-Sepharose and several washes in 20 mM Tris, 150 mM NaC1, 0.1% (v/v) Tween 20, and 0.1% (w/v) BSA buffer (pH 7.4) using 96-well plates, containing 0.65 µM hydrophilic PVDF filters (Millipore, Bedford, MA). The immunoprecipitated radioactivity was counted after transferring the filters to glass scintillation vials using a Multiscreen Multiple Punch System (Millipore).

The levels of GAD65Ab were expressed as a relative (GAD65 index) using one positive serum (Juvenile Diabetes Foundation World Standard for islet cell antibody) and three negative standard sera from healthy subjects, as described previously (13, 14). The upper level of normal was evaluated as mean + 3 SD sera from healthy individuals included in each assay. The interassay coefficient or variation was 14.7%, as evaluated in the positive standard serum in 53 consecutive assays. In the First and Second International GAD Autoantibody Workshops our GAD65Ab assay showed 100% and 82% sensitivity and 100% and 96% specificity, respectively.

IA-2Ab. Antibodies to the islet cell antigen IA-2 were measured under identical conditions as described for GAD65Ab (15, 16). The plasmid containing the cDNA for the cytoplasmic portion of islet antigen 512 was kindly donated by Dr. G. Eisenbart (Barbara Davis Research Center, Denver, CO). The same Juvenile Diabetes Foundation standard serum and control sera as in the GAD65Ab assay was used to correct the interassay coefficient of variation by calculating a 1A-2Ab index for each sample. The interassay coefficient of variation for the positive standard serum was 19.0% as determined in 38 consecutive assays.

Antibodies to the autonomic nervous system. Antibodies to the vagus nerve and sympathetic ganglia were assayed with a complement fixation indirect immunofluorescence technique using sections of the vagus nerve and superior cervical/ganglia of the rabbit (2). Following the incubation of the nerve tissue with human serum and subsequent washing, incubation with human complement was performed and immunofluorescence was measured using a fluoresceinated antibody to the C-fragment of human complement C3 (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA).

HLA phenotypes. HLA-DR typing was performed using a microlymphocytotoxicity assay (17). Separated B lymphocytes are incubated for 1 h at room temperature with specific antisera and then for 30 min at 37 C. Pooled DR rabbit complement was then added, and a second incubation was performed. Those cells positive for a specific DR antiserum in the presence of complement demonstrated a damaged membrane, as indicated by intracellular staining of eosin Y. Negative cells have intact membranes and no intracellular staining.

Statistical methods. Data were analyzed using ANOVA methods (18). In this study, individuals were classified as diabetic or nondiabetic and were assigned to other groups such as "high-GAD" or "low-GAD" based on whether they were above or below the median value for the measured value of GAD. Many analyses used split-plot techniques, and appropriate error terms were used for individual tests. In some cases, other factors such as age of the patients and HgbA1 were treated as continuous variables and an analysis of covariance was performed. In those cases, the group effects were sequentially assessed after controlling for the covariates. The JMP statistical program was used. (JMP is a registered trademark of the SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

Because many tests of peripheral nerve function are affected by age, we calculated age-adjusted Z scores. The effect of age on test performance was assessed in control subjects, and then the predicted age-adjusted performance was subtracted from the actual performance; Z scores were calculated by dividing the result by the root mean square error for test performance in controls.

Principle component analysis was used to calculate a composite Z score, which reflected motor conduction velocity, F wave latency, thermal threshold detection, and cardiovascular autonomic function. The composite index was then used as a response variable in a repeated measure ANOVA comparing high and low GAD65Ab and high and low HgbA1. In addition, the latter variables were treated as continuous measurements and analysis of covariance was performed to access associations with Z scores for the various categories of peripheral nerve function and composite peripheral nerve function.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Antibodies to GAD65Ab were detected in 32 of 37 patients both at the time of their initial evaluation and at the time of subsequent testing. Patients were categorized as low or high on the basis of whether their mean GAD65Ab for the whole study was above or below the median of the mean GAD65Ab index. The vast majority of the patients remained in the same category throughout the study (Fig. 1Go). There were a few exceptions. Two patients shifted from the high to the low group after yr 1, and one patient shifted from high to low after yr 2. Only one patient shifted from low to high, and this occurred after yr 2. IA-2Ab was detected at the time of the initial evaluation in 21 patients and present in 20 patients at the time of the third evaluation. Antibodies to the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems were present in 18 and 15 patients, respectively, at the time of the first evaluation (see Table 2Go). Three control subjects had antibodies to the sympathetic nervous system, and two had antibodies to the parasympathetic. Eleven patients had the HLA-DR3/4 haplotypes, 6 were DR3, 11 were DR4, and the remainder had other haplotypes.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. GAD65Ab profiles in the low and high GAD65Ab patients. Patients were categorized as low or high GAD65Ab on the basis of whether their mean GAD65Ab index for the whole study was above or below the median of the mean GAD65Ab.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Effect of GAD65Ab on glycemic control and insulin requirements

 
The patients with type 1 diabetes and control subjects were age and sex matched. The patients with high GAD65Ab were sex-matched but slightly older than those with low GAD65Ab (Table 1Go). Patients in good control had the same age and sex distribution as those in poor control. As previously reported (19), patients with high GAD65Ab had higher HgbA1 than those with low GAD65Ab (Table 2Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Clinical characteristics of patients1

 
Systolic blood pressure was slightly higher in the high GAD65Ab group at the time of the third evaluation (P < 0.05) (Table 2Go), and there was a negative correlation between blood pressure and creatinine clearance (P < 0.01).

Electrodiagnostic studies

Many electrophysiologic parameters were significantly affected by age, so all data were corrected accordingly in the assessment of differences between the low and high GAD65Ab groups. Patients with high GAD65Ab had slower motor nerve conduction velocities in the median, ulnar, and peroneal nerves (Table 3Go), and the means of the age-adjusted conduction velocity Z scores for the three nerves were different (P < 0.01), (Fig. 2Go). Motor nerve conduction velocity was slower in the median nerve in patients with poor glycemic control compared with those with good glycemic control (P < 0.05) (Table 4Go). There was a significant correlation between motor nerve conduction velocity and HgbA1 (P < 0.05) for each nerve (Table 4Go). The mean Z scores for motor nerve conduction velocities were lower in the patients with poor control (P < 0.025).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Electrodiagnostic studies

 


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Mean motor nerve conduction velocity Z scores. Patients with high GAD65Ab had lower mean Z scores than those with low GAD65Ab (P < 0.01). Patients with high HgbA1 had lower mean Z scores than those with low HgbA1 (P < 0.025).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Glycemic control and peripheral nerve function

 
To determine whether or not the effect of GAD65Ab on glycemic control could explain the GAD65Ab effect on conduction velocity, an analysis of covariance with respect to HgbA1 was performed. The difference between low and high GAD65Ab was still evident for each nerve (P < 0.025) even after correcting for glycemia (Table 3Go). The differences in mean conduction velocity Z scores for the low and high GAD65Ab patients also remained significant after correcting for the effect of glycemia.

F wave latencies were prolonged in the high GAD65Ab vs. the low GAD65Ab patients for the median (P < 0.05), ulnar (P < 0.01), and peroneal nerves (P < 0.025) (Table 3Go), and the differences in mean age adjusted F wave latency Z scores were different (P < 0.025) (Fig. 3Go). Glycemia, however, correlated with the F wave latency only for the ulnar nerve (P < 0.05) (Table 4Go). Analysis of covariance with respect to HgbA1 revealed that the differences in F wave latencies between the low and high GAD65Ab groups remained significant (P < 0.05) for the ulnar and peroneal nerves after correcting for the effect of glycemia (Table 3Go).



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Mean F wave latency Z scores. Patients with high GAD65Ab had prolonged latencies and higher age-adjusted mean F wave latency Z scores (P < 0.025). HgbA1 had no effect on the F wave latency mean Z scores.

 
Small somatosensory fibers. Thermal threshold in the diabetic patients were not different from the control subjects. The detection of heat in the feet, although apparently better in the diabetic patients, was not significantly different from controls. Although the detection of thermal thresholds tended to deteriorate in the diabetic patients during the course of the study, this effect was significant only for the detection of cold in the wrist. There was a poor correlation between age and individual thermal thresholds; the mean thermal threshold Z scores were weakly correlated with age (P = 0.075).

The thermal thresholds of the patients with high HgbA1 were not different from those with low HgbA1. Nevertheless, there was a positive correlation between the mean HgbA1 and the detection of thresholds for cold in the wrist (P < 0.001), heat in the wrist (P < 0.025), and cold in the feet (P < 0.025) (Table 4Go).

Patients with high GAD65Ab had higher thermal threshold for heat and cold in the feet than those with low GAD65Ab (P < 0.01) (Table 5Go) (Fig. 4Go). A similar trend in the wrist was not statistically significant. The mean thermal thresholds Z scores were higher for the GAD65Ab patients than with low GAD65Ab, even after the data were corrected for the effects of age and HgbA1 (P < 0.05).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Cardiovascular autonomic function and quantitative sensory testing

 


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Thermal thresholds. The mean thermal threshold Z scores were higher for the GAD65Ab patients than for those with low GAD65Ab even after correcting for effects of age and HgbA1 (P < 0.05). The mean thermal threshold Z scores of patients with high HgbA1 were not different from those with low HgbA1.

 
Cardiovascular autonomic function

Heart rate variability with deep breathing. At the time of their initial evaluation, heart rate variability with deep breathing was slightly greater in the diabetic patients than the control subjects. The maximum-minimum heart rate was 19% greater in the diabetic patients (P < 0.025), and the mean circular resultant was 20% greater (P < 0.05). The maximum-minimum results showed a significant negative correlation with age (P < 0.05), whereas the mean circular resultant did not. Glycemia did not significantly affect either parameter (Table 4Go).

The high GAD65Ab patients had decreased heart rate variability as assessed by both the maximum-minimum test (P < 0.025) and the mean circular resultant (P < 0.05) (Table 5Go).

Post-Valsalva R-R interval. The post-Valsalva R-R interval tended to be lower in the diabetic patients than the controls, significantly so at the time of the third evaluation (P < 0.05). Patients with low HgbA1 had higher post-Valsalva R-R intervals than did those with high HgbA1 (P < 0.05), and there was a significant correlation between test performance and HgbA1 (P < 0.01). Patients with high GAD65Ab had lower post-Valsalva R-R intervals than did those with low GAD65Ab (P < 0.05), although the differences were no longer significant after data were corrected for the effect of glycemia (P = 0.065) (Table 3Go).

Power spectral analysis. A dramatic effect of age was observed on all power spectra, which was corrected for statistically in all group comparisons. The power spectra of the diabetic patients as a group were no different from controls spectra. Spectra tended to be decreased in the patients with high GAD65Ab, but the results were not variable than the other tests and only the changes in total power and high-frequency power, both upright posture, were significant (P = 0.008; Table 5Go).

Mean cardiovascular autonomic Z scores. To integrate the performance on the multiple cardiovascular autonomic function tests we chose those tests that correlated the most with each other, the mean circular resultant, the post-Valsalva R-R interval, and the high-frequency supine power spectra. The mean age-adjusted Z scores were interpreted to reflect global cardiovascular autonomic function. Patients with high GAD65Ab had lower mean Z scores than those with low GAD65Ab (P = 0.04; Table 5Go and Fig. 5Go). There was no effect of glycemia on the mean Z scores. After correcting the data for the effect of glycemia, however, the Z score differences were of marginal significance (P = 0.055).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Cardiovascular autonomic Z scores. Patients with high GAD65Ab had lower mean Z scores than those with low GAD65Ab (P < 0.05), although the changes were marginally significant (P < 0.055) after data were corrected for the effect of glycemia. The Z scores were not significantly different, however, in those with high vs. low HgbA1.

 
Composite peripheral nerve function. Mean Z scores for motor conduction velocity, F wave latencies, thermal threshold detection, and global cardiovascular autonomic function were used to calculate a composite peripheral nerve function score. Those with low GAD65Ab had better peripheral nerve function than those with high GAD65Ab (P < 0.001) (Fig. 6Go). Patients with low HgbA1 did not have significantly different peripheral nerve function than those with high HgbA1. The duration of diabetes did not correlate with the individual tests of peripheral nerve function or composite peripheral nerve function (Fig. 7Go).



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Composite peripheral nerve function. Composite peripheral nerve function was better in patients with low GAD65Ab than in those with high GAD65Ab (P < 0.001). Those with high HgbA1 did not have significantly different peripheral nerve function than those with low HgbA1.

 


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Composite peripheral nerve function vs. duration of diabetes. The low GAD65Ab patients are represented by squares, the high GAD65Ab by circles. The open symbols represent the mean ± SE for each group. Composite peripheral nerve function was better in patients with low GAD65Ab than in those with high GAD65Ab (P < 0.001).

 
We also analyzed composite peripheral nerve function by log-linear analysis. This entailed categorizing patients according to their GAD65Ab and glycemia and then further subdividing them according to whether their mean composite peripheral nerve function Z score was good (a positive Z score) or poor (a negative Z score) (Table 6Go). This analysis revealed, not surprisingly, a disproportionate number of patients who had low GAD65Ab, low HgbA1, and good peripheral nerve function (group 1 in Table 6Go) or were the opposite for all three parameters (group 4a). Fourteen of the 18 patients with high GAD65Ab had poor peripheral nerve function whereas only 10 of 17 patients with high HgbA1 had poor function. Only 3 of 19 patients with low GAD65 had poor nerve function whereas 8 of 20 patients with good glycemia had poor function. The relatively large number of patients in group 2a and the presence of only one in group 3a illustrates how GAD65Ab was strongly associated with peripheral nerve function (P < 0.001), whereas HgbA1 was not (P = 0.7). When these parameters were analyzed as continuous variables, however, HgbA1 had a stronger association with nerve function (P < 0.001) than GAD65Ab (P < 0.02).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. Associations between GAD65Ab and HgbA1 and peripheral nerve function

 
ICA. There was no effect of IA-2Ab on glycemic control or peripheral nerve function.

Antibodies to the autonomic nervous system. There was no correlation between GAD65Ab and the antibodies to the sympathetic or parasympathetic nervous system. Peripheral nerve function was not different in patients with or without antibodies to the autonomic nervous system.

HLA phenotypes. Peripheral nerve function did not differ between patients with the HLA DR3/4 phenotype and those with other phenotypes.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The results of this study indicate that GAD65Ab has a number of important effects on the early natural history of type 1 diabetes. Although GAD65 is a recognized ß cell autoantigen, previous studies on the effect of GAD65Ab on ß-cell function have led to conflicting results. Petersen et al. (20) first reported that patients with high GAD65Ab have an accelerated loss of ß-cell function early in type 1 diabetes, and Tuomi et al. (21) observed that GAD65Ab led to decreased insulin secretion in nondiabetic patients with other autoimmune endocrine diseases. We (19) and others (22) have similarly observed in patients with type 1 diabetes that those with high GAD65Ab have worse glycemic control despite higher insulin requirements. Batstra et al. (23) and Yokota et al. (24), however, failed to find a relationship between GAD65Ab and ß-cell function, perhaps because their patients were young children (median age, 11 yr) in which instance ICAs have a stronger association with ß-cell destruction than do GAD65Ab. The study by Petersen et al. (20) and our own included mainly adolescent patients and young adults (mean age, 19 and 22 yr in the respective studies) age groups in which GAD65Ab appear to be critical.

The second major finding in this study is that patients with high GAD65Ab have worse peripheral nerve function than those with low GAD65Ab. Kaufman et al. (5) originally reported an association between GAD65Ab and peripheral nerve function in type 1 diabetes. This relationship was investigated because GAD65Ab had been shown to be associated with central nervous system dysfunction in the stiff man syndrome, a rare neurological syndrome linked to a central deficiency of the product of GAD enzyme, {gamma}-aminobutyric acid (25). The observations of Kaufman et al. (5) on the effect of GAD65Ab on peripheral nerve function in type 1 diabetes, however, were not confirmed in a series of subsequent reports (26, 27). Our study is different from these others, however, because we studied patients during the early natural history of the disease. We reasoned that multiple risk factors (hyperglycemia, hypertension, macrovascular disease, and smoking) have been linked to neuropathy in patients with chronic diabetes (28) and, therefore, any effect of GAD65Ab might be difficult to identify in patient with longstanding disease. Moreover, GAD65Ab may mediate autoimmune tissue destruction only transiently before and during the first few years of type 1 diabetes, processes that may not be accurately reflected by antibody titers measured years later. Thus, patients whose GAD65Ab titers decrease over time could easily be incorrectly categorized as GAD65Ab negative in cross-sectional studies of long-standing disease.

Could the poorer peripheral nerve function in the high GAD65Ab patients simply reflect their worse glycemic control? Previous studies of small numbers of patients has shown, and we have confirmed, that glycemic control impacts on peripheral nerve function even in the first few years after diagnosis (29, 30). Thus, it seems that the effect of GAD65Ab on glycemic control contributes to its effect on peripheral nerve function. Nevertheless, correcting the peripheral nerve test results for the impact of glycemia generally had only a minor effect on the statistical differences between the low and high GAD65Ab patients (Tables 3Go and 5Go). It has previously been recognized that hyperglycemia is not the only factor involved in the initiation and early progression of diabetic complications. Nathan (31) and the Diabetes Control and Complications Research Group (32) documented that hyperglycemia has a strong relationship to retinopathy, a slightly weaker relationship with nephropathy and somatosensory neuropathy, an even less robust relationship with autonomic neuropathy (32), and little or no correlation with macrovascular disease.

How might GAD65Ab affect peripheral nerve function by mechanisms independent of effects on ß-cell function and glycemic control? GAD is widely distributed throughout the peripheral and autonomic nervous systems, and it is possible that the function of the enzyme is compromised by circulating GAD65Ab. It is well established, for example, that circulating antibodies to the acetylcholine receptor disrupt the function of the neuromuscular junction in myasthenia gravis and the Eaton Lambert syndrome. GAD is an intracellular cytosolic enzyme, however, to which circulating GAD65Ab presumably has little access (33). An alternative explanation is that GAD65Ab reflects the presence of a systemic inflammatory process that has parallel effects on the ß cell and peripheral nervous system. There is recent evidence, for example, that GAD65Ab in patients with type 2 diabetes activates the secretion of acute phase proteins such as fibrinogen and C-reactive protein which, in turn, have been associated with inflammatory cytokines (34). This is an attractive hypothesis because of the mounting evidence that inflammation and endothelial cell dysfunction play a role in multiple diabetic complications, especially neuropathy (34, 35). We acknowledge, however, that the observed association between GAD65Ab and peripheral nerve function does not prove that GAD65Ab has a direct neurotoxic effect. Hyperglycemia-induced pancreatic or neurological damage, for example, might cause GAD65 to leak into the circulation, which would mean that GAD65Ab is then formed as a result (rather than the cause) of the neurological damage. We have shown, for example, that streptozotocin can cause GAD65Ab release from intact ß cells (36). Although it would seem unlikely that nerve damage would be severe enough in early diabetes for this to occur, this interpretation of our findings is difficult to disprove.

The potential clinical significance of the differences in peripheral nerve test performance between the low and high GAD65Ab patients needs to be addressed. None of the high GAD65Ab patients had signs or symptoms of diabetic neuropathy, nor was their performance outside the range of normal as established in control subjects. Thus, our patients did not exhibit evidence of even subclinical neuropathy, and in this regard our findings failed to confirm previous reports of early onset asymptomatic peripheral neuropathy in type 1 diabetes (37, 38). Our results are similar, however, to those of Ziegler et al. (39) as well as those of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial, in which peripheral nerve function in early diabetes was normal (32). Nevertheless, our results show GAD65Ab-related differences in performance on a wide variety of peripheral nerve function tests. Although the changes are small, this would be expected given the short duration of diabetes. IA2-Ab and antibodies to the autonomic nervous system, by contrast, did not correlate with glycemia or peripheral nerve function.

In summary, patients with type 1 diabetes and high GAD65Ab have worse glycemic control, higher insulin requirements, and slightly decreased somatosensory and autonomic nerve function.


    Footnotes
 
1 Supported by NIH Grants DK-32239 (to R.D.H.) and DK-26190 and DK-42654 (to A.L.), the Compton Nutrition Foundation, and Diabetes Endocrinology Research Center Grant DK-17047. Back

Received February 10, 2000.

Revised May 18, 2000.

Accepted June 6, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Duchen LW, Anjorin A, Watkins PJ, MacKay JD. 1980 Pathology of autonomic neuropathy in diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med. 92(Suppl 1):301–303.
  2. Rabinowe SL, Brown FM, Watts N, Smith AM. 1990 Complement-fixing antibodies to sympathetic and parasympathetic tissues in IDDM: autonomic brake index and heart rate variation. Diabetes Care. 13:1084–1089.[Abstract]
  3. Vinik AL, Leichter SB, Pittenger GL, et al. 1995 Phospholipid and glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibodies in diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes Care. 18:1225–1232.[Abstract]
  4. Barzilay J, Warram JH, Rand LI, Pfeifer MA, Krowlewski AS. 1992 Risk for cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy is associated with HLA-DR3/4 phenotype in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med. 116:544–549.
  5. Kaufman DL, Erlander MG, Clare-Salzler M, Atkinson MA, Maclaren NK, Tobon AJ. 1992 Autoimmunity to two forms of glutamate decarboxylase in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Clin Invest. 89:283–292.
  6. Zanone MM, Petersen JS, Peakman M, et al. 1994 High prevalence of autoantibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase in long-standing IDDM is not a marker of symptomatic autonomic neuropathy. Diabetes. 43:1146–1150.[Abstract]
  7. Roll U, Nuber A, Schroder A, Gerlach E, Janka HU, Ziegler AG. 1995 No association of antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase and diabetic complications in patients with IDDM. Diabetes Care. 18:210–215.[Abstract]
  8. Ewing DJ, Martyn CN, Young RJ, Clarke BF. 1985 The value of cardiovascular autonomic function tests: 10 years experience in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 8:491–498.[Abstract]
  9. Genovely H, Pfeifer MA. 1988 RR-Variation–The test of choice in diabetes. Diab Metab Rev. 4:255–271.[Medline]
  10. Akselrod S, Gordon D, Ubel A, Shannon DC, Barger AC, Cohen RJ. 1981 Power spectrum analysis of heart rate fluctuations: a quantitative probe of beat-to-beat cardiovascular control. Science. 213:220–222.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Jamal GA, Hanser S, Weir AL, Ballatyne JP. 1987 The neurophysiologic investigation of small fiber neuropathies. Muscle Nerve. 10:537–545.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Menard LA, Dempsey MD, Blankstein LA. 1981 Agar gel electrophoresis determination of glycosylated hemoglobin: effect of variant hemoglobins, hyperlipidemia, and temperature. Clin Chem. 27:472.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Grubin CE, Daniels T, Toivola B, Landin-Olsson M, Hagopian WA, Lernmark A. 1994 A novel radioligand binding assay to determine diagnostic accuracy of isoform-specific glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies in childhood IDDM. Diabetologia. 37:344–350.[Medline]
  14. Falorni A, Ortqvist E, Persson B, Lernmark A. 1995 Radioimmunoassays for glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65) and GAD65 autoantibodies using 35S or 3H recombinant human ligands. J Immunol Methods. 196:89–99.
  15. Rabin DU, Pleasic SM, Shapiro JA, et al. 1994 Islet cell antigen 512 is a diabetes-specific islet autoantigen related to protein tyrosine phosphatases. J Immunol. 152:3183–3187.[Abstract]
  16. Lan MS, Lu J, Goto Y, Notkins AL. 1994 Molecular cloning and identification of a receptor-type protein tyrosine phosphatase, IA-2, from human insulinoma. DNA Cell Biol. 3:505–514.
  17. Staff, Research Resources Branch, NIAID. 1987 Lymphocyte microcytotoxicity technique manual of tissue typing techniques. Bethesda, MD: NIH Handbook 76-545; p 45–58.
  18. Winer BJ. 1979 Statistical principles in experimental design, ed 2. New York: McGraw-Hill; 514–603.
  19. Hoeldtke RD, Bryner KD, Horvath, et al. 1997 Antibodies to GAD and glycemic control in recent-onset IDDM. Diabetes Care. 20:1900–1904.[Abstract]
  20. Petersen JS, Dyrberg T, Karlsen, et al. 1994 Glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65) autoantibodies in prediction of ß-cell function and remission in recent-onset IDDM after cyclosporin treatment: the Canadian-European Randomized Control Trial Group. Diabetes. 43:1291–1296.[Abstract]
  21. Tuomi T, Bjorses P, Falorni, et al. 1996 Antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase and insulin-dependent diabetes in patients with APECED (autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy). J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:1488–1494.[Abstract]
  22. Imagawa A, Itoh N, Waguri M. 1997 Immunohistological abnormalities in islets paralleled GAD antibodies and further deterioration of clinical features in recent-onset IDDM patients (Abstract). Diabetes. 46(Suppl 1):7A.
  23. Batstra MR, Pina M, Quan J, et al. 1997 Fluctuations in GAD65 antibodies after clinical diagnosis of IDDM in young children. Diabetes Care. 20:642–644.[Abstract]
  24. Yokota I, Shirakawa N, Shima K, et al. 1996 Relationship between GAD antibody and residual ß-cell function in children after overt onset of IDDM. Diabetes Care. 19:74–75.[Medline]
  25. Solimena M, Folli F, Aparis R, Pozza G, DeCamilli P. 1990 Autoantibodies to GABAergic neurons and pancreatic beta cells in stiff man syndrome. N Engl J Med. 322:1555–1560.[Abstract]
  26. Zanone MM, Petersen JS, Peakman M, et al. 1994 High prevalence of autoantibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase in long-standing IDDM is not a marker of symptomatic autonomic neuropathy. Diabetes. 43:1146–1150.
  27. Roll U, Nuber A, Schroder A, Gerlach E, Janka HU, Ziegler AG. 1995 No association of antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase and diabetic complications in patients with IDDM. Diabetes Care. 18:210–215.
  28. Maser RE, Pfeifer MA, Dorman JS, Kuller LH, Becker DJ, Orchard TJ. 1990 Diabetic autonomic neuropathy and cardiovascular risk, Pittsburgh epidemiology of diabetes complications study 111. Arch Intern Med. 150:1218–1222.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Young RJ, Macintyre CCA, Martyn CN, Prescott RJ, Ewing DJ, Smith RF. 1986 Progression of subclinical polyneuropathy in young patients with type 1 (insulin dependent) diabetes: associations with glycemic control and microangiopathy (microvascular complications). Diabetologica. 29:156–161.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Ziegler D, Mayer P, Mühlen H, Gries FA. 1991 The natural history of somatosensory and autonomic nerve dysfunction in relation to glycaemic control during the first 5 years after diagnosis of type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 34:822–829.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Nathan DM. 1996 The pathophysiology of diabetic complications: how much does the glucose hypothesis explain? Ann Intern Med. 124:186–189.
  32. The DCCT Research Group. 1995 The effect of intensive therapy on the development and progression of neuropathy. Ann Intern Med. 122:561–569.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Niranjala JKT, Medina-Kauwe L, Gibson KM. 1995 {gamma}-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) metabolism in mammalian neural and nonneural tissues. Comp Biochem Physiol. 112A:247–263.
  34. Pietropaolo M, Barinas-Mitchell E, Pietropaolo SL, Kuller LH, Trucco M. 2000 Evidence of islet cell autoimmunity in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 49:32.[Abstract]
  35. Veves A, Akbari CM, Primavera J, et al. 1998 Endothelial dysfunction and the expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthetase in diabetic neuropathy, vascular disease, and foot ulceration. Diabetes. 47:457.[Abstract]
  36. Hao W, Daniels T, Pipeleers DG, et al. 1999 Radioimmunoassay for glutamic acid decarboxylase-65. Diabetes Technol Ther. 1:13–20.[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Pfeifer MA, Weinberg CR, Cook DL, et al. 1984 Autonomic neural dysfunction in recently diagnosed diabetic subjects. Diabetes Care. 7:447–453.[Abstract]
  38. Lagi A, Cipriani M, Paggetti C, Fattorini L, Macerata A, Gensini GF. 1994 Power spectrum analysis of heart rate variations in the early detection of diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Clin Auton Res. 4:245–248.[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Ziegler D, Wolksw KDP, Mühlen H, Spuler M, Gries FA. 1992 Prevalence of cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction assessed by spectral analysis and standard tests of heart rate variation of newly diagnosed IDDM patients. Diabetes Care. 15:908–911.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
A. I. Vinik, D. Anandacoomaraswamy, and J. Ullal
Antibodies to Neuronal Structures: Innocent bystanders or neurotoxins?
Diabetes Care, August 1, 2005; 28(8): 2067 - 2072.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. D. Hoeldtke, K. D. Bryner, D. R. McNeill, S. S. Warehime, K. Van Dyke, and G. Hobbs
Oxidative Stress and Insulin Requirements in Patients with Recent-Onset Type 1 Diabetes
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2003; 88(4): 1624 - 1628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
R. D. Hoeldtke, K. D. Bryner, D. R. McNeill, G. R. Hobbs, J. E. Riggs, S. S. Warehime, I. Christie, G. Ganser, and K. Van Dyke
Nitrosative Stress, Uric Acid, and Peripheral Nerve Function in Early Type 1 Diabetes
Diabetes, September 1, 2002; 51(9): 2817 - 2825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoeldtke, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lernmark, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoeldtke, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lernmark, A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals