help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holterhus, P.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Hiort, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holterhus, P.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Hiort, O.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 85, No. 9 3245-3250
Copyright © 2000 by The Endocrine Society


Original Studies

Phenotypic Diversity and Testosterone-Induced Normalization of Mutant L712F Androgen Receptor Function in a Kindred with Androgen Insensitivity1

Paul-Martin Holterhus, Gernot H. G. Sinnecker and Olaf Hiort

Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of Lübeck (P.-M.H., O.H.), 23538 Lübeck; and Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Klinikum der Stadt Wolfsburg (G.H.G.S.), 38440 Wolfsburg, Germany

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Paul-Martin Holterhus, M.D., Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of Lubeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany. E-mail: holterhus{at}paedia.mu-luebeck.de


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Molecular causes of phenotypic diversity in androgen insensitivity syndrome, occurring even in the same family, have rarely been identified. We report on a family with four affected individuals, three brothers (B1–3) and their uncle, displaying strikingly different external genitalia: B1, ambiguous; B2, severe micropenis; B3, slight micropenis; and uncle, micropenis and penoscrotal hypospadias. All had been assigned a male gender. We detected the same L712F mutation of the androgen receptor (AR) gene in each subject. Methyltrienolone binding on cultured genital skin fibroblasts of B2 suggested moderate impairment of the ligand-binding domain [maximal binding capacity, 38.2 fmol/mg protein (normal); Kd, 0.21 nmol/L; normal range, 0.03–0.13 nmol/L]. In trans-activation assays, the mutant 712F-AR showed considerable deficiency at low concentrations of testosterone (0.01–0.1 nmol/L) or dihydrotestosterone (0.01 nmol/L). Remarkably, this could be fully neutralized by testosterone concentrations greater than 1.0 nmol/L. Hence, the 712F-AR could switch its function from subnormal to normal within the physiological concentration range of testosterone. This was reflected by an excellent response to testosterone therapy in B1, B2, and the uncle. Taking into account the well documented individual and time-dependent variation in testosterone concentration in early fetal development, our observations clearly illustrate the potential impact of varying ligand concentrations for distinct cases of phenotypic variability in androgen insensitivity syndrome.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
MUTATIONS OF the X-chromosomal androgen receptor (AR) gene represent the molecular basis of androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS), one of the most common causes of defective virilization in 46,XY individuals (1, 2). The clinical spectrum of virilization in this disease is particularly wide. It ranges from complete AIS, where in vivo androgen action is completely abolished, to different stages of partial AIS (PAIS), characterized by various degrees of ambiguous external genitalia. In addition, minimal forms with only slightly diminished virilization or only infertility have been described (3, 4, 5). As in many other genetic diseases, a consistent genotype-phenotype relationship does not exist in AIS. The phenotype can vary considerably between patients despite the same underlying genetic abnormality. Intriguingly, this divergence may even be observed between subjects from the same kindred (6, 7). Therefore, it has been concluded that factors independent from specific AR gene mutations may influence the individual AIS phenotype (6, 7, 8). However, although a variety of modulators of AR function in vitro have been characterized in recent years (9, 10, 11), very few causes of phenotypic variability have actually been confirmed in individual AIS patients (12, 13).

The AR is a ligand-activated transcription factor of androgen-regulated target genes (14, 15). Testosterone and dihydrotestosterone represent the two most important physiological ligands. One of the major determinants of AR function in vitro and in vivo is the concentration of the ligand. Elevation of ligand concentration is paralleled by increasing androgen binding to the receptor up to a saturation state (16). Transcriptional activation of androgen-regulated target genes due to the AR in vitro is clearly dependent on hormone concentration (17). In vivo, inadequate ligand concentration due to defects of testosterone biosynthesis or 5{alpha}-reduction leads to diminished androgen action, as evidenced by defective masculinization of genetic male individuals (18, 19). Mutations of the AR gene located within the ligand-binding receptor domain can be associated with considerable loss of function due to impaired hormone binding, thus also resulting in defective masculinization. Transcriptional activity in vitro can be severely reduced over the whole range of hormone concentrations (20, 21, 22). However, in certain mutations, increasing ligand concentration can compensate reduced activity. In some, but not all, of these cases, one may also find a good clinical response to androgen therapy (20, 21, 23, 24). Such observations have lead to speculations about whether variations in androgen concentration during male sexual differentiation could explain the phenotypic variability observed in some AIS patients (6, 7, 8). In this context, we present a PAIS family with unusually wide phenotypic diversity associated with the previously uncharacterized L712F AR mutation. The association of our clinical and experimental findings adds substantial evidence to the possible role of variations in ligand concentration in particular cases of phenotypic diversity in AIS patients.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The study was approved by the ethical committee of the Medical University of Lübeck (Lübeck, Germany).

Patients

Brother 1 (B1). B1 was 11 months old at initial presentation. The child had ambiguous external genitalia, with a scrotum bipartitum, a phallus 3 cm in length, and a well developed glans penis 0.5–0.6 cm in diameter (Fig. 1Go). A small introitus of a urogenital sinus was located at the base of the phallus. Two gonads, 1 cm3 in volume (Prader orchidometer), were palpable at the anulus inguinalis superficialis. The phenotype corresponded to AIS type IIIb according to Sinnecker et al. (4). Basal serum hormone concentrations were 0.17 nmol/L testosterone, 0.07 nmol/L dihydrotestosterone, and 0.2 IU/L LH (all values normal for prepubertal age). After im injections of 1500 IU hCG every other day over 14 days, testosterone increased to 25.3 nmol/L and dihydrotestosterone to 2.19 nmol/L, thus excluding a defect of testosterone biosynthesis or 5{alpha}-reductase type II deficiency. The basal sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) concentration in serum was 142.68 nmol/L (normal for age). After stanozolol administration according to a previously published standardized protocol (4, 25), SHBG decreased to 104.93 nmol/L (78.3% of the initial value; normal, <=63.4%), indicating PAIS. Although hCG administration alone had no effect on the external genitalia, a total of three injections of 100 mg testosterone every 4 weeks increased the length of the phallus to 4 cm and the diameter of the glans to 1.3 cm. Due to these data and to clinical observations of the uncle of B1 (see below), it was decided to raise the child in a male gender, and at the age of 15 months, surgical correction of the external genitalia with a two-stage hypospadias repair was performed.



View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Pedigree of the family of this study and respective phenotypes. From left to right, brother 1 (B1), brother 2 (B2), brother 3 (B3), and their uncle.

 
Brother 2 (B2). At the age of 3 months, B2 was presented by his mother because of his micropenis. The phallus did not protrude the body surface (Fig. 1Go). Upon pulling up the tissue of the mons pubis, penile length was 1.0 cm. The glans penis had a diameter of 0.9 cm. No hypospadias was present. Both testes (2 cm3 each in volume, by Prader orchidometer) were palpable in the scrotum. The right testis previously underwent orchiopexy because of incarcerated inguinal hernia. The basal serum testosterone concentration was 11.0 nmol/L; the LH concentration was 5.3 IU/L (both hormones were elevated for age). At the age of 7 months, the basal serum SHBG concentration was 146.96 nmol/L (normal for age). After stanozolol administration, SHBG decreased to 108.9 nmol/L (74.5% of the initial value), again indicating PAIS. Because of the good response to androgen therapy in B1 and his uncle and because of the same underlying AR gene mutation (see below), B2 received three injections of 100 mg testosterone, im, every 4 weeks at the age of 1 yr. In addition, a thin layer of 2.5% dihydrotestosterone gel had been administrated externally on the penile skin twice daily during the same 3-month period. Penile length increased from 1.5 cm before treatment to 3 cm after treatment. Because of a penile chordae, a slight curvature of the penis appeared after therapy, which was surgically corrected thereafter.

Brother 3 (B3). The external genitalia of B3 appeared completely normal at birth. He was presented at the age of 7 weeks at our department because of the previous diagnosis of AIS in his two brothers and his uncle (Fig. 1Go). Penile length was 1.6 cm [slight micropenis; normal for age, 2.7 ± 0.5 cm (26)], penile diameter was 1.0 cm, the meatus urethrae was normal. A slight dorsal curvature of the phallus due to a subtle chordae could be observed. Both testes were palpable (1 cm3 in volume each, Prader orchidometer) in a normally developed scrotum. Basal serum hormone concentrations were 14.7 nmol/L testosterone and 7.5 IU/L LH (both elevated for age). The serum SHBG concentration decreased to 85.5% of the initial value in response to stanozolol at the age of 13 months, thus indicating PAIS as in his two siblings. He was lost from follow-up, and to our knowledge, androgen therapy was not initiated until today.

Uncle. The uncle of the three brothers had a small penis with penoscrotal hypospadias and chordee at birth, which was operated upon at the age of 4 and 5 yr. Gynecomastia developed at the age of 12 yr. Pubertal development was lacking, no beard developed, and genitals remained infantile, but erections were noted. When he was 14 yr old, bilateral mastectomy was performed. Semen analysis revealed azoospermia at the age of 23 yr. At the age of 37 yr he presented in good clinical condition; height was 180.1 cm, weight was 88.5 kg, penis length was 4 cm, circumference was 7 cm, diameter of the glans was 2 cm, and diameter of the corpora cavernosa was 0.5 cm (Fig. 1Go). The orificium urethrae externum was located at the urethral ridge close to the glans. Both testes had a volume of 10 cm3 (Prader orchidometer). There were scars at the sites of mastectomy, no beard but single dark hairs on the chin, and no recessus temporales. The phenotype corresponded to AIS type IIb with otherwise normal clinical findings.

Basal values for LH (between 8.1–10.4 IU/L), serum testosterone (between 57.4–59.8 nmol/L; normal, 10.3–34.2 nmol/L), and serum estradiol (between 173–401 pmol/L) were increased. The basal SHBG level was increased to 96.6 nmol/L (normal, 20.6–62.6 nmol/L). After stanozolol administration, SHBG decreased to 64.3 nmol/L or 66.6% of the initial value (normal, < 63.4%), which is slightly less than normal, indicating considerable remaining in vivo activity of the AR.

Treatment with high dose testosterone (500 mg testosterone enanthate, im, weekly) was initiated. All hormone measurements were performed 1 week after the last injection. LH decreased to 5.5–8.0 IU/L, serum testosterone increased to 75.2–102.5 nmol/L, estradiol increased to 269–346 pmol/L, and SHBG decreased to 78 nmol/L.

After 4 weeks of treatment, testosterone dose was increased to 1000 mg testosterone enanthate once a week. The LH level dropped further into the normal range (1.5–2.4 IU/L). Serum testosterone increased to levels between 102.5–191.4 nmol/L, estradiol increased to 140–508 pmol/L, and SHBG decreased to 50 nmol/L into the normal range (20.6–62.6 nmol/L).

Four months after initiation of the therapy a slight beard on the chin developed, the penis was 5–6 cm in length and 9 cm in circumference, the diameter of the glans was 2 cm, left testis was 8 mL, right testis was 8–10 mL, and pubic hair was Tanner stage 5 with slight hair at the linea alba. The patient reported being more active and stronger, and his libido was significantly increased. He shaved his chin every 3 days compared to once every 3 weeks before therapy. He reported having erections several times a day and being more sensitive to sexual arousal. His skin was more fatty and he sweated more. The volume of the ejaculate, however, remained very small. Semen analysis was not performed.

Androgen binding analyses

Only from subject B2 could genital skin fibroblasts be obtained during surgical correction of the external genitalia. Control fibroblasts were derived from a foreskin specimen of a normal prepubertal male subject. Binding analyses were performed as previously reported (12). In brief, the cells were cultured at 37 C with 5% CO2 in MEM (Life Technologies, Inc., Grand Island, NY), supplemented with 10% FCS, 1% (vol/vol) MEM nonessential amino acids (Life Technologies, Inc.), and penicillin (200 IU/ml)/streptomycin (0.2 mg/ml). For androgen binding studies, confluent cultures of genital skin fibroblasts were incubated in duplicate with medium containing increasing concentrations of 17ß-hydroxy-17{alpha}-[3H]-methyl-4,9,11-estrotrien-3-one ([3H]R1881; 0.02–3.0 nmol/L) from DuPont-NEN Life Science Products (Boston, MA) in either the presence or the absence of a 200-fold molar excess of unlabeled hormone. Two independent binding assays were performed on the fibroblasts of the patient. For Scatchard calculations and statistics, Excel personal computer software (Microsoft Corp., Richmond, WA) was used.

Mutation detection analyses

Detection of a CTT (L)->TTT (F) point mutation at codon position 712 in subject B1 was reported in a previous overview of AR gene mutations (27). In detail, from this subject (B1) and a male control, genomic DNA had been extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes according to standard procedures. The DNA served as a template for the PCR. All eight exons of the AR gene had been amplified individually by PCR, followed by screening for mutations using nonradioactive single strand conformation analysis as described previously (2, 28). Resulting from a band shift on single strand conformation analysis, the exon 4 PCR product of subject B1 was purified using the Qiaquick extraction kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) and subsequently directly sequenced with the Sequenase sequencing kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Buchler, Braunschweig, Germany) using [{gamma}-32P]ATP end-labeled primers (2).

In the present study, exon 4 genomic DNA PCR products of the AR gene of subjects B2 and B3, who had not been born at the time of molecular diagnosis in B1, were directly sequenced. The same was performed on genomic DNA of their mother and their uncle.

Plasmids, transient transfections, and expression studies

Construction of a 712F point mutated AR expression plasmid (pSVAR712F) was based on the wild-type human AR expression plasmid pSVAR0 (29), which was a gift from Dr. A. O. Brinkmann, Erasmus University (Rotterdam, The Netherlands). In the first step, the mutation 712 TTT (F) was introduced into pSVAR0 using the QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit from Stratagene (La Jolla, CA) according to recommendations of the manufacturer. Using pSVAR0 as template, 14 PCR cycles with Pfu DNA polymerase and the mutagenic primers 5'-G-GGA-GAG-AGA-CAG-TTT-GTA-CAC-GTG-GTC-AAG-TGG-3' and 5'-CCA-CTT-GAC-CAC-GTG-TAC-AAA-CTG-TCT-CTC-TCC-C-3' were run. Subsequently, the methylated, but not mutated, pSVAR0 template DNA was removed by DpnI digestion. Remaining mutant plasmids were transformed into Escherichia coli bacteria (Epicurian coli XL1-Blue supercompetent cells, Stratagene). Accuracy of mutagenesis was verified in plasmid preparations by plasmid sequencing covering also the restriction recognition sites KpnI and BamHI located upstream and downstream of the mutation. In the second step, the mutant 1350-bp KpnI-BamHI fragment was excised from the first step product and recloned into a new pSVAR0 plasmid, leading to the final mutant plasmid pSVAR712F. The latter was verified again by plasmid sequencing for in-frame ligation and correctness of mutant DNA sequence.

Transient transfections were performed on CHO (Chinese hamster ovary) cells. They were maintained in 5% CO2 at 37 C in DMEM with the nutrient mix F-12 (DMEM/F-12, Life Technologies, Inc.), 10% (vol/vol) FCS, and antibiotics as described above for genital skin fibroblasts. For trans-activation studies 10% dextran/charcoal-treated FCS was used. The cells were transfected by the Ca2+ phosphate precipitation method (30) with only minor changes as previously described (12, 13). Activation of the androgen-responsive mouse mammary tumor virus-luciferase reporter plasmid (Organon, West Orange, NJ) due to pSVAR712F or pSVAR0 was investigated using 0.01, 0.1, 1.0, 10.0, and 100.0 nmol/L testosterone as well as 0.01, 0.1, 1.0, and 10.0 nmol/L dihydrotestosterone, respectively. All transfections were performed in triplicate. Four independent experiments were performed at different times. Mutant and wild-type AR constructs were always investigated at the same time. Transcriptional activity was expressed as fold induction of luciferase activity related to basal activity in the absence of hormone. Transfection efficiency was controlled by cotransfection of the constitutively active pRL-SV40 Renilla luciferase expression plasmid (Promega Corp., Madison, WI). Firefly and Renilla luciferase activity were determined using the dual luciferase reporter gene assay (Promega Corp.).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mutation detection analysis

Exon 4 genomic DNA PCR fragments of B2, B3, their mother, and their uncle were investigated by DNA sequencing because of the previous detection of a new CTT (L)->TTT (F) point mutation at codon 712 of the AR gene in subject B1 (27). In subjects B2 and B3 and the uncle, the same mutation as that in B1 was found, while the mother was heterozygous.

Androgen binding analyses

Only genital skin fibroblasts of patient B2 could be obtained for binding studies. Scatchard analysis of R1881 binding on these cells revealed a slightly elevated Kd (Exp 1, 0.21 nmol/L; Exp 2, 0.22 nmol/L) and a normal maximal binding capacity (Exp 1, 38.2 fmol/mg protein; Exp 2, 53.4 fmol/mg protein), indicating moderate malfunction of the ligand-binding AR domain. Expectedly, the normal control strain revealed normal binding parameters (Kd, 0.08 nmol/L; binding capacity, 26.4 fmol/mg protein; Fig. 2Go).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Scatchard analysis on androgen binding of genital skin fibroblasts of brother 2 (Exp 1; {blacksquare}) and a control strain (•).

 
Trans-activation studies

The pSVAR712F construct demonstrated partial transactivation deficiency in the presence of dihydrotestosterone compared with the wild-type AR. Maximum activity was about three fourths of wild-type activity at 0.1 nmol/L dihydrotestosterone and higher. Using testosterone as ligand, again a partial trans-activational deficit of the mutant AR was observed. This was mainly observed at 0.01 and 0.1 nmol/L testosterone, respectively. However, testosterone concentrations of 1 nmol/L and higher showed increasing compensation of the functional defect of the mutant AR (Fig. 3Go). Differences in reporter gene induction between the two constructs were not due to different AR protein expression levels, as evidenced by Western immunoblot analyses on cell lysates of transiently transfected CHO cells (data not shown).



View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Transcriptional activation of mouse mammary tumor virus-luciferase reporter gene in the presence of either testosterone (left panel) or dihydrotestosterone (right panel). Reporter gene activity is expressed as fold induction of luciferase activity in the presence of hormone related to basal activity in the absence of hormone of four independent experiments (mean ± 1 SD).

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mutation detection analyses demonstrated the same L712F point mutation of the AR gene in all affected family members and also in the heterozygous mother, indicating a germline mutation. The mutation is located within exon 4 of the AR gene encoding the 5' part of the ligand-binding domain. The surrounding region of codon 712 is of particular significance for sufficient ligand binding and subsequent transcription activation (14). Accordingly, Scatchard analysis on cultured genital skin fibroblasts of subject B2 unveiled defective androgen binding with an increased Kd. This was supported by cotransfection studies demonstrating reduced transcriptional activity of the mutant pSVAR712F complementary DNA construct. In conclusion, the L712F point mutation has to be considered the cause of the deficient virilization in this family.

Interestingly, trans-activation studies revealed a very particular pattern of functional impairment of the mutant 712F-AR. Defective transcriptional activation was restricted to low hormone concentrations, whereas increasing androgen supply was accompanied by a considerable gain of function. Testosterone at concentrations higher than 1.0 nmol/L could even completely neutralize the defect of the mutant AR. Hence, the 712F-AR is able to change its functional constitution in vitro from subnormal to (almost) normal within the physiological concentration range of testosterone (dihydrotestosterone) in vitro.

Fetal testosterone formation starts at about the 9th week of gestation (31, 32) with peak concentrations appearing at about the 16th week of gestation. They are comparable to those of the normal adult male range (33, 34). The urethral folds have usually fused completely in the midline to form the cavernous urethra and corpus spongiosum by 12th to 14th weeks (Ref. 35 and references therein). Remarkably, testosterone concentrations in these early stages of fetal development show considerable individual variation (32, 34, 36). It is interesting in this respect that there are many reports on partially active mutations within the ligand-binding domain of the AR that are characterized by substantial changes of transcriptional activity in the presence of different ligand concentrations. Androgen levels in the upper physiological concentration range or above can sometimes fully compensate a receptor defect evident at low concentrations in trans-activation assays. As in our family, such mutations have often been associated with a PAIS phenotype, and some patients have been reported with a good response to high dose androgen therapy (20, 23, 24). Based on such clinical and experimental observations, it has been proposed by different researchers that variations of ligand concentration during male sexual differentiation could be one relevant factor for the phenotypic variability in AIS (6, 7, 8). It is conceivable that variations in androgen levels in fetal target tissues within a critical concentration range that would be able to elicit either subnormal or normal trans-activation function of the 712F-AR may have had relevant consequences for the phenotype of the presented subjects. Although in certain patients, the androgen concentration could just have been high enough to induce (almost) full biological AR activity, as suggested for B2 and B3, this will not have been the case in the more severely affected patients, B1 and the uncle.

It is an important observation concerning the biological interpretation of the molecular data in this case that all three androgen-treated patients showed very good clinical response to either testosterone alone (B1 and uncle) or in combination with external dihydrotestosterone (B2). This is additionally reflected by the successive down-modulation of LH and SHBG in response to increasing serum levels of testosterone during therapy in the adult uncle. Thus, in this family, the in vivo effects of androgen therapy principally support the trans-activation data and vice versa. However, trans-activation data alone should usually be considered carefully while discussing a direct physiological relevance (37, 38). It is important to note that partial activity in reporter gene assays is not necessarily associated with sufficient androgen action in vivo (Ref. 20 and references therein; 39). Also intriguingly in this respect, the high serum testosterone levels between 57.4–59.8 nmol/L in the uncle before therapy did not lead to sufficient in vivo androgen action, although full transcriptional activity of the mutant 712F-AR was demonstrated in vitro at this concentration. This indicates that even the interpretation and comparability of distinct hormone concentrations as used in cultured transfected cells with respect to possible physiological actions during embryonic development or in later life is very difficult. In the presented family, the well documented good clinical and biochemical response to androgens observed in the uncle as well as the considerable bioactivity of the mutant receptor in vivo as deduced from the SHBG androgen sensitivity test encouraged us to assign B1 a male gender and treat him accordingly. Whether the quantitative difference between testosterone and dihydrotestosterone concerning activation of the 712F-AR in transfected CHO cells may be significant with respect to physiological target tissues exceeds the capability of the used overexpression model and has not been investigated in more detail.

It may be presumed that different molecular mechanisms independent from AR sequence alterations and ligand concentration may also influence the genotype phenotype correlation in AIS (8). In particular, it cannot be excluded that such mechanisms could also have influenced the variability of the phenotypic appearance in the presented kindred. This, however, has not been investigated in detail in the present study. Remarkably, only a few factors have actually been demonstrated in individual AIS patients (13). One such mechanism that could play a role in phenotypic diversity in AIS is an individually different AR messenger ribonucleic acid level (8). Rodien et al. investigated this hypothesis in an AIS family with striking phenotypic diversity and a M780I point mutation of the AR gene. However, the researchers did not find significant differences (6). Unfortunately, we could not examine this possibility in the present study, because only fibroblasts of one subject (B2) were available. In an earlier study, however, we did not find decreased AR messenger ribonucleic acid levels in fibroblast strains of five patients with missense mutations of the AR gene compared with four control cell lines (40). Increasing knowledge of cross-modulation of AR mediated gene transcription (9, 10, 11) and coactivators and corepressors of nuclear receptor function (41) will presumably uncover further insights into the understanding of androgen action and phenotypic diversity in AIS.

In summary, the presented clinical data in combination with the particular pattern of transcription activation due to the mutant 712F-AR clearly delineate the importance of ligand concentration in phenotypic diversity in AIS. It is very likely that in certain cases, different phenotypes could be based on variation of receptor function caused by variations of androgen availability in the critical time of genital differentiation during early embryonic development.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dagmar Struve and Nicole Homburg for excellent technical assistance.


    Footnotes
 
1 Presented in part at the 38th Annual Meeting of the European Society for Pediatric Endocrinology, Warsaw, Poland, August 29 through September 1, 1999, and at the 16th Annual Meeting of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Pädiatrische Endokrinologie, Cologne, Germany, November 5–7, 1999. This work was supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG Grants Hi 497/3–2 and 3–3 to O.H. and Si 323/2–2 to G.H.G.S.), by the Klinisch-Experimentelle Forschungseinrichtung of the Medical University of Lübeck (to P.M.H.), and by the Friedrich Bluhme und Else Jebsen Foundation (Lübeck, Germany). Back

Received February 21, 2000.

Revised May 24, 2000.

Accepted June 5, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. McPhaul MJ, Marcelli M, Zoppi S, Griffin JE, Wilson JD. 1993 Genetic basis of endocrine disease. IV. The spectrum of mutations in the androgen receptor gene that causes androgen resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 76:17–23.[Abstract]
  2. Hiort O, Huang Q, Sinnecker GHG, et al. 1993 Single strand conformation polymorphism analysis of androgen receptor gene mutations in patients with androgen insensitivity syndromes: application for diagnosis, genetic counseling, and therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 77:262–266.[Abstract]
  3. Quigley CA, De Bellis A, Marschke KB, el-Awady MK, Wilson EM, French FS. 1995 Androgen receptor defects: historical, clinical, and molecular perspectives. Endocr Rev. 16:271–321.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Sinnecker GHG, Hiort O, Nitsche EM, Holterhus PM, Kruse K, German Collaborative Intersex Study Group. 1997 Functional assessment and clinical classification of androgen insensitivity in patients with mutations of the androgen receptor gene. Eur J Pediatr. 156:7–14.[Medline]
  5. Hiort O, Horter T, Schulze W, Kremke B, Sinnecker GHG. 1999 Male infertility and increased risk of disease in future generations. Lancet. 354:1907–1908.[Medline]
  6. Rodien P, Mebarki F, Mowszowicz I, et al. 1996 Different phenotypes in a family with androgen insensitivity caused by the same M780I point mutation in the androgen receptor gene. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:2994–2998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Evans BAJ, Hughes IA, Bevan CL, Patterson MN, Gregory JW. 1997 Phenotypic diversity in siblings with partial androgen insensitivity syndrome. Arch Dis Child. 76:529–531.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. McPhaul MJ, Marcelli M, Tilley WD, Griffin JE, Wilson JD. 1991 Androgen resistance caused by mutations in the androgen receptor gene. FASEB J. 5:2910–2915.[Abstract]
  9. Culig Z, Hobisch A, Cronauer MV, et al. 1994 Androgen receptor activation in prostatic tumor cell lines by insulin-like growth factor-I, keratinocyte growth factor, and epidermal growth factor. Cancer Res. 54:5474–5478.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. De Ruiter PE, Teuwen R, Trapman J, Dijkema R, Brinkmann AO. 1995 Synergism between androgens and protein kinase-C on androgen-regulated gene expression. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 110:R1–6.
  11. Lobaccaro JM, Poujol N, Térouanne B, et al. 1999 Transcriptional interferences between normal or mutant androgen receptors and activator protein 1: dissection of the androgen receptor functional domains. Endocrinology. 140:350–357.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Holterhus PM, Brüggenwirth HT, Hiort O, et al. 1997 Mosaicism due to a somatic mutation of the androgen receptor gene determines phenotype in androgen insensitivity syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 82:3584–3589.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Holterhus PM, Wiebel J, Sinnecker GH, et al. 1999 Clinical and molecular spectrum of somatic mosaicism in androgen insensitivity syndrome. Pediatr Res. 46:684–690.[Medline]
  14. Jenster G, van der Korput HAGM, van Vroonhoven C, van der Kwast TH, Trapman J, Brinkmann AO. 1991 Domains of the human androgen receptor involved in steroid binding, transcriptional activation, and subcellular localization. Mol Endocrinol. 5:1396–1404.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Brinkmann AO, Blok LJ, de Ruiter PE. 1999 Mechanisms of androgen receptor activation and function. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 69:307–313.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Brown TR, Rothwell SW, Migeon CJ. 1981 Comparison of methyltrienolone and dihydrotestosterone binding and metabolism in human genital skin fibroblasts. J Steroid Biochem. 14:1013–1022.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Deslypere JP, Young M, Wilson JD, McPhaul MJ. 1992 Testosterone and 5{alpha}-dihydrotestosterone interact differently with the androgen receptor to enhance transcription of the MMTV-CAT reporter gene. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 88:15–22.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Boehmer AL, Brinkmann AO, Sandkuijl LA, et al. 1999 17ß-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase-3 deficiency: diagnosis, phenotypic variability, population genetics, and worldwide distribution of ancient and de novo mutations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 84:4713–4721.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Hiort O, Willenbring H, Albers N, et al. 1996 Molecular genetic analysis and human chorionic gonadotropin stimulation tests in the diagnosis of prepubertal patients with partial 5{alpha}-reductase deficiency. Eur J Pediatr. 155:445–451.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Bevan CL, Brown BB, Davies HR, Evans BAJ, Hughes IA, Patterson MN. 1996 Functional analysis of six androgen receptor mutations identified in patients with partial androgen insensitivity syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 5:265–273.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Bevan CL, Hughes IA, Patterson MN. 1997 Wide variation in androgen receptor dysfunction in complete androgen insensitivity syndrome. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 61:19–26.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. De Bellis A, Quigley CA, Cariello NF, et al. 1992 Single base mutations in the human androgen receptor gene causing complete androgen insensitivity: rapid detection by modified denaturating gradient gel electrophoresis technique. Mol Endocrinol. 6:1909–1920.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Ong YC, Wong HB, Adaikan G, Yong EL. 1999 Directed pharmalcological therapy of ambiguous genitalia due to an androgen receptor gene mutation. Lancet. 354:1444–1445.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. McPhaul M, Marcelli M, Tilley WD, Griffin JE, Isidro-Gutierrez RF, Wilson JD. 1991 Molecular basis of androgen resistance in a family with a qualitative abnormality of the androgen receptor and responsive to high-dose androgen therapy. J Clin Invest. 87:1413–1421.
  25. Sinnecker G, Köhler S. 1989 Sex hormone-binding globulin response to the anabolic steroid stanozolol: evidence for its suitability as a biological androgen sensitivity test. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 68:1195–1200.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Winter JSD, Faiman C. 1972 Pituitary-gonadal relations in male children and adolescents. Pediatr Res. 6:126–135.
  27. Hiort O, Sinnecker GH, Holterhus PM, Nitsche EM, Kruse K. 1996 The clinical and molecular spectrum of androgen insensitivity syndromes. Am J Med Genet. 63:218–222.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Hiort O, Wodtke A, Struve D, Zöllner A, Sinnecker GHG, German Collaborative Intersex Study Group. 1994 Detection of point mutations in the androgen receptor gene using non-isotopic single strand conformation polymorphism analysis. Hum Mol Genet. 3:1163–1166.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Brinkmann AO, Faber PW, van Rooij HCJ, et al. 1989 The human androgen receptor: domain structure, genomic organization and regulation of expression. J Steroid Biochem. 34:307–310.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Chen C, Okayama H. 1987 High-efficiency transformation of mammalian cells by plasmid DNA. Mol Cell Biol. 7:2745–2752.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Siiteri PK, Wilson JD. 1974 Testosterone formation and metabolism during male sexual differentiation in the human embryo. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 38:113–125.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Diez D’Aux RC, Pearson Murphy BE. 1974 Androgens in the human fetus. J Steroid Biochem. 5:207–210.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Abramovich DR, Rowe P. 1973 Foetal plasma testosterone levels at mid-pregnancy and at term: relationship to foetal sex. J Endocrinol. 56:621–622.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Reyes FI, Boroditsky RS, Winter JSD, Faiman C. 1974 Studies on human sexual development. II. Fetal and maternal serum gonadotropin and sex steroid concentrations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 38:612–617.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Grumbach MM, Conte FA. 1998 Disorders of sex differentiation. In: Wilson JD, Foster DW, Kronenberg HM, Larsen PR, eds. Williams textbook of endocrinology, 9th Ed. Philadelphia, London, Toronto, Montreal, Sydney, Tokyo: W. B. Saunders Co., 1303–1425.
  36. Takagi S, Yoshida T, Tsubata K, et al. 1977 Sex differences in fetal gonadotrophins and androgens. J Steroid Biochem. 8:609–620.[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Marcelli M, Zoppi S, Wilson CM, Griffin JE, McPhaul MJ. 1994 Amino acid substitutions in the hormone-binding domain of the human androgen receptor alter the stability of the hormone receptor complex. J Clin Invest. 94:1642–1650.
  38. McPhaul MJ. 1999 Molecular defects of the androgen receptor. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 69:315–322.[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Kazemi-Esfarjani P, Beitel LK, Trifiro M, et al. 1993 Substitution of valine-865 by methionine or leucine in the human androgen receptor causes complete of partial androgen insensitivity, respectively with distinct androgen receptor phenotypes. Mol Endocrinol. 7:37–46.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Hellwinkel OJC, Hiort O. Androgen receptor transcription in genital skin fibroblasts of patients with androgen insensitivity syndrome. Proc of the 37th Annual Meet of the European Society for Pediatric Endocrinology, 1998. Horm Res. 50:P295.
  41. Jenster G. 1998 Coactivators and corepressors a mediators of nuclear receptor function: an update. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 143:1–7.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. B. Askew, R. T. Gampe Jr., T. B. Stanley, J. L. Faggart, and E. M. Wilson
Modulation of Androgen Receptor Activation Function 2 by Testosterone and Dihydrotestosterone
J. Biol. Chem., August 31, 2007; 282(35): 25801 - 25816.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. Bouvattier, B. Mignot, H. Lefevre, Y. Morel, and P. Bougneres
Impaired Sexual Activity in Male Adults with Partial Androgen Insensitivity
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2006; 91(9): 3310 - 3315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. He, R. T. Gampe Jr., A. T. Hnat, J. L. Faggart, J. T. Minges, F. S. French, and E. M. Wilson
Probing the Functional Link between Androgen Receptor Coactivator and Ligand-binding Sites in Prostate Cancer and Androgen Insensitivity
J. Biol. Chem., March 10, 2006; 281(10): 6648 - 6663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
H. J. Dubbink, R. Hersmus, C. S. Verma, H. A. G. M. van der Korput, C. A. Berrevoets, J. van Tol, A. C. J. Ziel-van der Made, A. O. Brinkmann, A. C. W. Pike, and J. Trapman
Distinct Recognition Modes of FXXLF and LXXLL Motifs by the Androgen Receptor
Mol. Endocrinol., September 1, 2004; 18(9): 2132 - 2150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
Y. L. Giwercman, A. Nordenskjold, E. M. Ritzen, K. O. Nilsson, S.-A. Ivarsson, U. Grandell, and A. Wedell
An Androgen Receptor Gene Mutation (E653K) in a Family with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia due to Steroid 21-Hydroxylase Deficiency as well as in Partial Androgen Insensitivity
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2002; 87(6): 2623 - 2628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holterhus, P.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Hiort, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holterhus, P.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Hiort, O.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals