help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mauriège, P.
Right arrow Articles by Després, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mauriège, P.
Right arrow Articles by Després, J. P.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 85, No. 7 2446-2454
Copyright © 2000 by The Endocrine Society


Original Studies

Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue Metabolism at Menopause: Importance of Body Fatness and Regional Fat Distribution1

P. Mauriège, P. Imbeault, D. Prud’homme, A. Tremblay, A. Nadeau and J. P. Després

Lipid Research Center (P.M., D.P., J.P.D.), Diabetes Research Unit (A.N.), CHUQ Medical Research Center, Physical Activity Sciences Laboratory, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Laval University (P.M., P.I., D.P., A.T.), and Québec Heart Institute, Laval Hospital (J.P.D.), Québec, Canada

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Pascale Mauriège, Ph.D., Lipid Research Center, Laval University Medical Research Center, CHUL, 2705 boulevard Laurier, Room TR-93, Ste-Foy, Québec, Canada G1V 4G2. E-mail: diabolo{at}internetclub.fr


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The aim of this study was to examine the contribution of menopause per se on sc adipose tissue (AT) metabolism in 16 women classified on the basis of their menopausal status: 8 postmenopausal (mean ± SD age, 57 ± 6 yr) vs. 8 premenopausal individuals (37 ± 5 yr). These 2 groups were matched for sc abdominal adipose cell size (within 0.02 µg lipid/cell) and visceral AT accumulation (within 15 cm2), measured by computed tomography. Fasting plasma glucose and insulin levels as well as their responses to an oral glucose load were similar regardless of the women’s hormonal status. Subcutaneous abdominal and femoral AT lipoprotein lipase activities as well as fat cell lipolysis were determined in both groups. Epinephrine induced antilipolysis at low concentrations and lipolysis at higher doses in both adipose sites and groups. The maximal lipolytic response to epinephrine or to isoproterenol (ß-adrenergic agonist) as well as the maximal antilipolytic effect of either the catecholamine or UK-14304 ({alpha}2-adrenergic agonist) assessed in sc adipocytes were similar in pre- and postmenopausal women. In addition, neither the ß- nor the {alpha}2-adrenoceptor sensitivity of sc adipose cells differed according to subjects’ age. Finally, maximal lipolysis promoted by postadrenoceptor agents and AT-lipoprotein lipase activity did not vary among adipose regions or between groups. Taken together, these results suggest that menopause per se does not influence sc AT metabolism once the variation related to adipose cell size and total body fatness is taken into account.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ABDOMINAL OBESITY and visceral adipose tissue accumulation are well known correlates of metabolic complications predictive of increased risk of coronary heart disease and type II diabetes in both genders (1, 2, 3). In this regard, the increase in abdominal, and more particularly visceral, fat accumulation that occurs at menopause (4, 5, 6) is associated with a greater risk of developing an atherogenic lipid profile and/or an insulin-resistant state (7, 8). Regional variation in the lipid storage and/or mobilizing potencies of adipose cells has already been identified as a potential mechanism that could account for the differences in body fat distribution in obesity (3, 9, 10, 11). Indeed, adipose tissue lipoprotein lipase (AT-LPL) activity has been shown to be higher in gluteal or femoral adipose tissue than in sc abdominal fat depot from both lean and obese premenopausal women (12, 13, 14, 15). Moreover, an enhanced adipose cell lipolytic response to catecholamines has commonly been reported in sc abdominal compared to gluteo-femoral regions of nonobese and obese young women (12, 13, 16, 17, 18).

Although our understanding about the clustering of alterations in metabolic risk factors that accompanies menopause made progress over the last decade (19, 20, 21, 22, 23), there has been little investigation of the role of adipose tissue metabolism, an important factor to be considered when studying obesity-related metabolic complications. Indeed, discordant results have been reported concerning either the lack (13, 24) or the presence (25) of site differences in AT-LPL activity in postmenopausal women. A lack of regional variation in lipolysis with age has also been observed by some investigators (13, 26), whereas others have reported that sc abdominal fat cells were more responsive to catecholamine stimulation than gluteal adipocytes (24, 27). One reason for these conflicting data could be that the pre- and postmenopausal women compared in these previous studies (13, 25) were not matched for total adiposity and regional fat distribution. Nicklas et al. (27) recently reported that an increased visceral adipose tissue accumulation was associated with higher rates of lipolysis in both sc abdominal and gluteal adipocytes, thus suggesting an important role for regional fat distribution in the age-related variation in adipose cell lipolytic activity.

Therefore, the aims of the present study were 1) to examine whether regional variation persists in sc adipose tissue metabolism at menopause, and 2) to verify whether differences in adipocyte metabolic activities between pre- and postmenopausal women would remain once the concomitant variation in both adipose cell size and body fat distribution is taken into account.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Study subjects

Sixteen healthy Caucasian, moderately overweight women were recruited through the media and gave their written informed consent to participate in this study, which was approved by the Laval University medical ethics committee. Eight pairs of subjects matched for both levels of sc abdominal adipose tissue (within 15 cm2) measured by computed tomography and for sc abdominal fat cell weight (within 0.02 µg lipid/cell), but displaying marked differences in age (premenopausal vs. postmenopausal), were compared for potential differences in sc adipose cell metabolism. All participants underwent a physical examination by a physician, which included medical history. Subjects with cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or other endocrine disorders or those taking medication that could have affected blood pressure or glucose or lipid metabolism were excluded. All women were sedentary (i.e. they performed <30 min of exercise/week), nonsmokers, and moderate alcohol and caffeine consumers and had stable body weights at the time of the study (i.e. no subject had been involved in a weight loss program for the last 6 months). Women who had undergone surgical menopause were excluded from the study. Subjects were considered postmenopausal if they had not menstruated for at least 2 yr and if their plasma estradiol concentrations were lower than 120 pg/mL. None of them was taking or had ever taken hormonal replacement therapy. Premenopausal women had regular menstrual cycles, and none was using oral contraceptives or was lactating at the time of the study. All measurements were performed while the subjects were in the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle.

Body fatness and regional fat distribution

Body weight was determined with a standard beam scale. Body density was determined by the underwater weighing technique, and percent body fat was derived from body density (28). Pulmonary residual volume was measured using the helium dilution method (29). Fat mass was calculated from the derived percentage of body fat and total body weight. Fat-free mass was then simply calculated as the subtraction of fat mass from total body weight. Body density, fat mass, and fat-free mass are highly reproducible variables that show reliability coefficients greater than 0.97 (30). Waist girth was measured according to the procedures recommended at the Airlie Conference (31). Lemieux et al. (32) reported that the coefficient of variation between two consecutive measurements of waist girth is very low (0.32%). Computed tomography (CT) was performed on a Siemens Somatom DRH scanner (Erlangen, Germany), according to the methodology previously described (33). Briefly, subjects were examined in the supine position with both arms stretched above the head. CT scans were performed at the abdominal (between L4 and L5 vertebrae) level, using an abdominal scout radiograph to establish the position of the scan to the nearest millimeter. Total adipose tissue (AT) areas were calculated by delineating these areas with a graph pen and then computing the AT surfaces with an attenuation range of -190 to -30 Houndsfield units (34). Abdominal visceral AT area was determined by drawing a line within the muscle wall surrounding the abdominal cavity. The abdominal sc AT area was calculated by subtracting the visceral AT area from the total abdominal AT area. A high coefficient of reliability (r = 0.99) has been reported by our group for the determination of sc and visceral fat accumulation by CT (35).

Adipose tissue biopsy procedure and LPL activity

After an overnight fast, women were subjected to biopsies of sc fat, one performed in the periumbilical region (abdominal site) and the other at the anterior midthigh level (femoral site). A small cutaneous incision (1 cm) was performed in both sites under local anesthesia (1% lidocaine, without epinephrine), and about 350 mg sc adipose tissue were surgically removed from the two fat depots. Samples of approximately 100 mg adipose tissue from each region were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80 C for later measurement of heparin-releasable LPL activity according to the method of Savard et al. (36). AT-LPL activity was expressed as micromoles of free fatty acids released per h/106 cells. As AT-LPL activity is associated with fat cell size (36), AT-LPL was also expressed per cell surface area (i.e. nanomoles of free fatty acids per h/µm2 times 108).

Adipocyte lipolysis

Samples of approximately 250 mg AT from each site were used for the measurement of fat cell lipolysis. Adipocytes were isolated according to the method of Rodbell (37) in a Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 4% BSA (KRBA) and 5 mmol/L glucose plus 1 mg/mL collagenase, as previously described (36). Digestion took place in a shaking water bath under an air-gas phase of 95% O2 and 5% CO2, for 40 min at 37 C. The suspension was then filtered, and the cellular filtrate obtained was rinsed three times with 5 mL KRBA. Isolated adipocytes were finally resuspended in KRBA to obtain a final concentration of approximately 1000 cells/100 µL.

Extracellular glycerol release was used as the indicator of adipocyte lipolysis. One hundred-microliter aliquots of the continuously stirred cell suspension were placed in 1.5-mL conical tubes. Two of these tubes were used for cell counting and sizing; two others containing 20 µL KRB were immediately placed on ice and provided an evaluation of the initial concentration of glycerol in the medium. Agents for lipolysis stimulation or inhibition were added just before the beginning of the assay in 20-µL portions to obtain the desired final concentration. After a 2-h incubation at 37 C in a shaking water bath under an air-gas phase of 95% O2 and 5% CO2, 100 µL HCl (1 N) were added to all tubes to stop the reaction, then 100 µL NaOH (1 N) were added to neutralize the medium. All tubes were stoppered and stored at -20 C until glycerol determination according to the method of Mauriège et al. (38). The NADH concentration was measured by bioluminescence with a luciferase solution, using a 2250 Dynatech Corp. luminometer (Chantilly, VA) (17, 18). For each concentration of stimulator or inhibitor agent, the amount of glycerol was taken as the average of the quantities obtained from the two incubated tubes. Glycerol measurement by bioluminescence is very sensitive and is especially well adapted when only small amounts of adipose tissue are available (17, 18, 38). The mean adipose cell diameter was assessed from the measurement of at least 500 cells/site and per subject, using a Leitz microscope equipped with a graduated ocular (Rockleigh, NJ). Because of the spherical shape and high lipid content of the adipocytes (95%), both the adipose cell volume and the surface area can be calculated from the mean adipocyte diameter, and the density of triolein (0.915 g/mL) was used to transform adipose cell volume into fat cell weight, as previously described (39).

The lipolytic activity of the isolated fat cells was tested with isoproterenol (nonselective ß-agonist), UK-14304 (selective {alpha}2-agonist), and epinephrine, which is a mixed agonist ({alpha}2/ß) with a higher affinity for {alpha}2-adrenoceptor sites (16). Ascorbic acid (0.1 mmol/L) was included in the incubation medium to prevent catecholamine degradation. Some experiments were conducted with forskolin (direct activator of adenylate cyclase), dibutyryl cAMP (stimulator of the protein kinase hormone-sensitive lipase complex and phosphodiesterase-resistant cAMP analog), and theophyline (mainly inhibitor of cGMP-inhibited phosphodiesterase) (17). When antilipolytic effects were investigated, the incubation buffer was supplemented with 5 µg/mL adenosine deaminase (ADA) to remove adenosine released into the incubation medium by the isolated fat cells; this procedure allowed better investigations of {alpha}2-adrenoceptor-mediated antilipolytic effects (16, 18, 38). Lipolysis was expressed either per cell number (i.e. in micromoles of glycerol per 106 cells/2 h) or per unit of cell surface area (i.e. in nanomoles of glycerol per µm2/108·2 h) to compensate for variations in fat cell size (18, 38). In cases where complete concentration-response curves were obtained, they were compared for both responsiveness and sensitivity. The responsiveness was expressed as the difference between basal glycerol release and the lipolytic rate at maximum effective concentration of the agents tested (10-5 mol/L isoproterenol or forskolin, 10-3 mol/L dibutyryl cAMP or theophyline). The ß-adrenergic sensitivity was considered as the concentration of isoproterenol giving half-maximal stimulation of lipolysis (EC50), whereas the {alpha}2-adrenergic sensitivity was calculated as the concentration of UK-14304 that produced half-maximal inhibition of lipolysis (IC50). Both were evaluated by logarithmic conversion of each concentration-response curve. The higher the EC50 (isoproterenol) or IC50 (UK-14304) value, the lower the ß- or the {alpha}2-adrenergic sensitivity, respectively.

Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)

A 75-g OGTT was performed in the morning after an overnight fast. Blood samples were collected in tubes containing ethylenediamine tetraacetate and Trasylol (Miles Pharmaceutics, Rexdale, Canada) through a venous catheter from an antecubital vein at -15, 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 min. Plasma glucose was measured enzymatically (40), whereas the plasma insulin concentration was determined by RIA with polyethylene glycol separation (41). The total glucose and insulin areas under the curve during OGTT were calculated with the trapezoid method.

Plasma lipids and lipoproteins

Blood samples were obtained in the morning after a 12-h fast from an antecubital vein. Cholesterol (CHOL) and triglyceride levels in plasma and lipoprotein fractions were measured enzymatically on a RA-1000 automated analyzer (Technicon Instruments Corp., Tarrytown, NY) referenced to Centers for Disease Control (Atlanta, GA). Plasma very low density lipoproteins (density, <1.006 g/mL) were isolated by ultracentrifugation (42), and the high density lipoprotein fraction was obtained after precipitation of low density lipoprotein (LDL) in the infranatant (density, >1.006 g/mL) with heparin and MnCl2 (43).

Drugs and chemicals

Collagenase, BSA, adenosine deaminase, and enzymes for glycerol assays were obtained from Roche Molecular Biochemicals (Laval, Canada). Ascorbic acid, theophyline, forskolin, dibutyryl cAMP, (-)isoproterenol bitartrate, (-)epinephrine bitartrate, and cold triolein were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). [14C]Triolein was obtained from NEN Life Science Products-DuPont (Missisauga, Canada). UK-14304 [5-bromo-6-(2-imidazolin-2-ylamino)-quinoxaline] was provided by Dr. D.A. Faulkner (Pfizer, Inc., Sandwich, England). All other chemicals and organic solvents were of the highest purity grade commercially available. The same batches of hormones, pharmacological agents, collagenase, and albumin were used in all experiments.

Statistical methods

Two subgroups of eight women displaying both similar sc abdominal AT area measured by CT and fat cell size, but differing in age, were compared. Student’s t test was used for comparison of anthropometric and metabolic variables between pre- and postmenopausal women. The effects of age (young vs. middle-aged) and of adipose site (abdominal vs. femoral) on adipose tissue lipolytic curves were tested by two-way ANOVA for repeated measures. All statistical analyses were performed using Jump software 3.2.2. from SAS Institute, Inc. (Cary, NC), adapted for Macintosh computers.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subjects’ characteristics

The physical characteristics of our sample of moderately overweight women are presented in Table 1Go. As expected from the design, a significant difference was observed in the subjects’ age (P < 0.0001). However, neither body mass index nor fat mass differed among pre- and postmenopausal women. Both groups also displayed similar visceral and sc abdominal AT areas, measured by CT, as well as comparable sc fat cell weights. No regional variation was found in adipose cell size within both groups. The metabolic characteristics of subjects are shown in Table 2Go. With the exception of plasma cholesterol and LDL-CHOL concentrations being significantly lower in pre- than postmenopausal women (P < 0.05), the lipid-lipoprotein profile did not differ between groups. In addition, no difference in fasting plasma glucose and insulin levels or in the corresponding responses to an oral glucose load was found between pre- and postmenopausal women (Fig. 1Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Physical characteristics of the women

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Metabolic profile of the women

 


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Plasma glucose and insulin responses to a 75-g OGTT in pre- and postmenopausal women. Bars represent the area under the curve. Glucose areas are expressed as 10-3 mmol/L·min, whereas insulin areas are expressed as 10-3 pmol/L·min. Values are the mean ± SE.

 
AT-LPL activity

As illustrated in Fig. 2Go, neither regional variation nor difference between groups was observed in AT-LPL activity, although it tended to be higher in pre- than in postmenopausal women (P = 0.06–0.09). Similar results were obtained when this enzyme activity was expressed per cell number (not shown).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. LPL activity in sc abdominal and femoral adipose tissues from pre- vs. postmenopausal women. Values are the mean ± SE of eight experiments performed in duplicate.

 
Adipose cell lipolytic function

Basal lipolytic rate and ADA-stimulated lipolysis. As shown in Fig. 3Go, basal lipolysis was not significantly different between groups or among adipose regions. Addition of ADA at 5 µg/mL increased the basal lipolytic rate by about 1.5–2 times in adipocytes of premenopausal women. However, the level of glycerol release achieved with this enzyme did not vary with the adipose region in postmenopausal subjects. Indeed, although ADA-stimulated adipose cell lipolysis tended to be higher in pre- than postmenopausal women, this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.06–0.09).



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Basal lipolytic rate and ADA-stimulated lipolysis in sc abdominal and femoral adipocytes from pre- vs. postmenopausal women. Values are the mean ± SE of eight experiments performed in duplicate.

 
Epinephrine responsiveness. In the presence of ADA, epinephrine, which is known for its mixed agonist ({alpha}2/ß) adrenergic properties on lipolysis, initiated a similar biphasic responsiveness in all cell types (main effects for age: F1, 21 = 1.09; P = 0.31; main effects for site: F1, 21 = 0.98; P = 0.33; Fig. 4Go). Inhibition of lipolysis was observed at the lowest concentrations (from 10-9–10-7 mol/L); this effect was completely reversed at higher doses (from 10-6–10-5 mol/L), where the hormone exerted a lipolytic action, thus suggesting differential recruitment of {alpha}2- and ß-adrenoceptors.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Effect of epinephrine (EPI) on ADA-stimulated lipolysis in sc abdominal and femoral adipocytes from pre- vs. postmenopausal women. Values are the mean ± SE of eight experiments performed in duplicate. Glycerol release was expressed as the difference between stimulated (with epinephrine) and basal (i.e. in presence of 5 µg/mL ADA) values. Negative values reflect the inhibition of lipolysis.

 
Selective {alpha}2- and ß-adrenergic effects. As epinephrine responsiveness results from both {alpha}2- and ß-adrenoceptor stimulation, selective adrenergic agonists were used to discriminate between these two antagonistic effects.

To study the influence of the {alpha}2-adrenoceptor component, the effect of the selective {alpha}2-agonist, UK-14304, was tested on ADA-stimulated lipolysis (Fig. 5Go). UK-14304 exerted a similar antilipolytic response in both groups (F1,13 = 1.09; P = 0.31) and adipose sites (F1,13 = 0.47; P = 0.50). Moreover, the {alpha}2-adrenergic sensitivity, estimated as the half-maximal antilipolysis induced by UK-14304 (which clustered at 1–3 nmol/L), was not significantly different among adipose depots or between the two matched groups.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. UK14304-induced inhibition of ADA-stimulated lipolysis in sc abdominal and femoral adipocytes from pre- vs. postmenopausal women. Values are the mean ± SE of eight experiments performed in duplicate. Antilipolysis is given as the difference between values in the presence of UK14304 and ADA values. Agonist concentrations required for half-maximal inhibition of lipolysis (IC50) were determined from these dose-response curves.

 
The effect of ß-agonist isoproterenol on basal lipolysis was also examined to characterize the ß-adrenoceptor component (Fig. 6Go). Stimulation of lipolysis induced by isoproterenol did not differ among adipose regions (F1,21 = 2.91; P = 0.10) or between the two matched groups (F1,21 = 0.47; P = 0.78). In addition, ß-adrenergic sensitivity, defined as the concentration of isoproterenol required for half-maximal lipolysis (values ranging from 20–60 nmol/L), was not significantly different regardless of the anatomical location of fat and the subject’s age. Similar results were observed for epinephrine-, isoproterenol-, and UK 14304-induced lipolysis expressed per cell number (data not shown).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Isoproterenol (ISO)-induced lipolysis in sc abdominal and femoral adipocytes from pre- vs. postmenopausal women. Fat cells were incubated without ADA (i.e. in standard conditions), and values are the mean ± SE of eight experiments performed in duplicate. Agonist concentrations required for half-maximal stimulation of lipolysis (EC50) were determined from these dose-response curves.

 
Lipolytic responses to postadrenoceptor agents. Despite the lack of a group difference in catecholamine responsiveness, the effects of agents that stimulate lipolysis at well defined postreceptor levels were also investigated (Fig. 7Go). For this purpose, adipose cells were incubated without ADA in the presence of dibutyryl cAMP (10-3 mol/L), forskolin (10-5 mol/L), or theophyline (10-3 mol/L). As expected, there was no regional variation and no difference between pre- and postmenopausal women when lipolysis was stimulated with maximal concentrations of these postadrenoceptor agents.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Lipolytic responsiveness to postadrenoceptor agents of sc abdominal and femoral adipocytes from pre- vs. postmenopausal women. Fat cells were incubated without ADA, in the presence of dibutyryl cAMP (DcAMP; 10-3 mol/L), forskolin (FK; 10-5 mol/L), or theophyline (THEO; 10-3 mol/L). Previous experiments revealed that the concentrations of the different drugs used were maximally effective doses. Values are the mean ± SE of eight experiments performed in duplicate, and basal glycerol release has already been subtracted. Lipolytic responsiveness was calculated as the difference between lipolysis at the maximum concentration of each agent minus the basal lipolytic rate.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The objective of the present study was to examine whether sc adipose tissue metabolism differed between pre- and postmenopausal women after controling for the concomitant variations in body fatness and adipose tissue distribution, an issue that has not been addressed in previous studies (13, 25). To the best of our knowledge, our study documents for the first time that the early phase of menopause is not associated with major changes in the adipose cell mobilizing and/or storage capacities compared to the premenopausal status.

Postmenopausal women in the present study were characterized by lower sc abdominal and visceral adipose tissue areas measured by CT compared to those in other studies (27, 44). Such a discrepancy could be easily explained by the age and menopausal status of the participants, as women from the two latter studies were older than our subjects. On the other hand, the finding that aging in women does not seem to be associated with changes in the adipose tissue lipid storage capacity has recently been reported in middle-aged men (45). The similar adipose tissue LPL activity found in sc abdominal and femoral depots of postmenopausal women is largely the consequence of the absence of regional variation in fat cell size that we observed in our group. This finding is consistent with most (13, 24, 26, 44), but not all (25), previous findings.

The similar biphasic epinephrine response profile in all cell types probably reflects the interaction of the hormone with both types of adrenoceptors and supports the idea of the differential recruitment of {alpha}2- and ß-sites (16, 17, 18, 38). These data suggest that hypertrophy of adipose cells, which is commonly associated with an expanded adipose tissue mass rather than age per se, is a critical correlate of the increased {alpha}2-adrenoceptor component in obesity (10, 46).

The absence of difference in basal lipolytic rate regardless of either the adipose region or the group considered is consistent with the unaltered ADA-stimulated lipolysis and agrees with previous studies conducted on middle-aged men (45) and women (13, 27). The tendency for a lower ADA-simulated lipolysis in adipose cells of post- vs. premenopausal women may reflect a greater inhibition of lipolysis by adenosine with aging, as previously suggested in old rats (47, 48). Further studies are therefore needed to address this issue. Once again, the finding that basal lipolysis did not vary among adipose regions and groups could be explained by the similar adipose cell size, as this variable was highly correlated with basal glycerol release (9). On the other hand, comparison of epinephrine- or isoproterenol-induced maximal lipolysis (at 10-5 mol/L) revealed no regional variation or any group difference. This observation was further strengthened by the similar lipolytic effects of agents acting selectively at the adenylate cyclase, the lipase-protein kinase A complex, or the phosphodiesterase level, findings concordant with an unaltered postadrenoceptor lipolytic pathway. The observation that adipose cell lipolytic capacity was not impaired in postmenopausal women seems to be in contrast with previous observations (45, 49). In these studies, however, the decreased lipid mobilization, which may be linked to a defect at the hormone-sensitive lipase level observed with aging, was probably due to the fact that middle-aged men had higher amounts of visceral adipose tissue than young individuals. In the present study, pre- vs. postmenopausal women had similar levels of total and abdominal fat. These differences among studies emphasize the importance of visceral fat accumulation as a critical correlate of sc adipose cell lipolysis (27).

The fact that postmenopausal women displayed higher plasma cholesterol levels has been observed by others, and the higher levels of LDL-CHOL accounted for most of the increased total cholesterol concentration commonly observed at menopause (19, 20, 21, 22, 23). The lack of alterations in plasma insulin and glucose levels with aging may be partly explained by the design of our study, as both groups of women had similar levels of visceral adipose tissue. Indeed, postmenopausal women with a large visceral AT deposition had higher plasma insulin levels than middle-aged women displaying a low intraabdominal fat accumulation (27). Thus, the increased visceral adiposity that is generally observed at menopause appears to be an important factor for the metabolic deteriorations that occur in women during this period. However, the increase in LDL-CHOL levels that we observed with age appears to be largely independent of the concomitant variation in adiposity, a finding that we have previously reported in both genders (50). Although visceral AT accumulation and its related metabolic dysfunctions are associated with changes in circulating sex steroid hormones, it is clear that high androgen levels are characteristic features of intraabdominal obesity in pre- and postmenopausal women, whereas the reverse situation is generally found in men (7, 8, 51). In this regard, whether 1) the similar visceral AT deposition observed in pre- and postmenopausal women may account for the lack of difference in the lipolytic capacity of sc abdominal adipocytes, or 2) a third factor related to visceral adipose tissue, such as an altered sex steroid hormone profile, which could lead to alterations in sc adipose cell metabolism, is controlled by our matching procedure is presently unknown. Based upon the fact that abdominal obese women are hyperandrogenic regardless of their menopausal status and that testosterone exerts a lipolytic action on sc adipose tissue (52), it seems reasonable to assume that our matching of pre- and postmenopausal women for regional fat distribution may have also allowed us to "control" the effect of sex steroids on adipose tissue lipolysis. Further studies are needed, however, to test this hypothesis.

Taken together, our data show that regional variation in sc adipose tissue metabolism is not observed in the early phase of menopause. In addition, once the concomitant variation in body fatness, body fat distribution, and adipose cell size is taken into account, our sample of pre- and postmenopausal women displays similar sc adipose tissue lipolysis and LPL activity. These results suggest that regional fat distribution is an important determinant that should be considered when investigating age-related effects on adipose tissue metabolism in women.


    Acknowledgments
 
We express our gratitude to France Levasseur, Henri Bessette, Germain Thériault, and Gilles Lortie for their excellent collaboration at various stages of the study. The subjects and the Physical Activity Sciences Laboratory staff are also gratefully acknowledged. We also thank Marie Tremblay and Rachelle Duchesne of the Diabetes Research Unit for their assistance with data collection, as well as Suzanne Brulotte of the Department of Radiology (Laval University Hospital, Québec, Canada) for her help with the use of the computed tomograph. The contribution of the staff of the Lipid Research Center is also gratefully acknowledged.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by the Medical Research Council of Canada. Back

Received October 13, 1999.

Revised March 25, 2000.

Accepted March 29, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Björntorp P. 1993 Visceral obesity: a "civilization syndrome." Obesity Res. 1:206–222.[Medline]
  2. Després JP. 1994 Dyslipidaemia and obesity. Bailliere Clin Endocrinol Metab. 8:629–660.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Kissebah AH, Krakower GR. 1994 Regional adiposity and morbidity. Physiol Rev. 74:761–811.[Free Full Text]
  4. Ley CJ, Lees B, Stevenson JC. 1992 Sex- and menopause-associated changes in body-fat distribution. Am J Clin Nutr. 55:950–954.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Heymsfield SB, Gallagher D, Poehlman ET, et al. 1994 Menopausal changes in body composition and energy expenditure. Exp Gerontol. 29:377–389.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Tchernof A, Poehlman ET. 1998 Effects of the menopause transition on body fatness and body fat distribution. Obesity Res. 6:246–254.[Medline]
  7. Björntorp P. 1996 The regulation of adipose tissue distribution in humans. Int J Obesity. 20:291–302.[Medline]
  8. Björntorp P. 1996 The android woman–a risky condition. J Intern Med. 239:105–110.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Arner P. 1988 Control of lipolysis and its relevance to the development of obesity in man. Diabetes Metab Rev. 4:507–515.[Medline]
  10. Bouchard C, Després JP, Mauriège P. 1993 Genetic and nongenetic determinants of regional fat distribution. Endocr Rev. 14:72–93.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Leibel RL, Edens NK, Fried SK. 1989 Physiologic basis for the control of body fat distribution in humans. Annu Rev Nutr. 9:417–443.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Rebuffé-Scrive M, Enk L, Crona N, et al. 1985 Fat cell metabolism in different regions in women. Effect of menstrual cycle, pregnancy and lactation. J Clin Invest. 75:1973–1976.
  13. Rebuffé-Scrive M, Eldh J, Hafström LO, Bjorntörp P. 1986 Metabolism of mammary, abdominal, and femoral adipocytes in women before and after menopause. Metabolism. 35:792–797.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Arner P, Lithell H, Wahrenberg H, Brönnegard M. 1991 Expression of lipoprotein lipase in different subcutaneous adipose tissue regions. J Lipid Res. 32:423–429.[Abstract]
  15. Imbeault P, Alméras N, Richard D, Després JP, Tremblay A, Mauriège P. 1999 Effect of a moderate weight loss on adipose tissue lipoprotein lipase activity and expression: existence of sexual variation and regional differences. Int J Obesity. 23:957–965.
  16. Mauriège P, Galitzky J, Berlan M, Lafontan M. 1987 Heterogeneous distribution of beta- and alpha2-adrenoceptor binding sites in human fat cells from various deposits: functional consequences. Eur J Clin Invest. 17:156–165.[Medline]
  17. Mauriège P, Prud’homme D, Lemieux S, Tremblay A, Després JP. 1995 Regional differences in adipose tissue lipolysis from lean and obese women: existence of postreceptor alterations. Am J Physiol. 269:341–350.
  18. Mauriège P, Imbeault P, Langin D, et al. 1999 Regional and gender variations in adipose tissue lipolysis in response to weight loss. J Lipid Res. 40:1559–1571.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Kuller LH, Meilahn EN, Cauley JA, Gutai JP, Matthews KA. 1994 Epidemiologic studies of menopause: changes in risk factors and disease. Exp Gerontol. 29:495–509.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Stevenson JC. 1996 Metabolic effects of the menopause and oestrogen replacement. Bailliere Clin Endocrinol Metab. 10:449–467.
  21. Barrett-Connor E. 1997 Sex differences in coronary heart disease. Why are women so superior? The 1995 Ancel Keys Lecture. Circulation. 95:252–264.[Free Full Text]
  22. Poehlman ET, Toth MJ, Ades PA, Rosen CJ. 1997 Menopause-associated changes in plasma lipids, insulin-like growth factor I and blood pressure: a longitudinal study. Eur J Clin Invest. 27:322–326.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Gower BA, Nagy TR, Goran MI, Toth MJ, Poehlman ET. 1998 Fat distribution and plasma lipid-lipoprotein concentrations in pre- and postmenopausal women. Int J Obesity. 22:605–611.
  24. Rebuffé-Scrive M, Lönnroth P, Marin P, Wesslau C, Björntorp P, Smith U. 1987 Regional adipose tissue metabolism in men and postmenopausal women. Int J Obesity. 11:347–355.[Medline]
  25. Raison J, Basdevant A, Sitt Y, Guy-Grand B. 1988 Regional differences in adipose tissue lipoprotein lipase activity in relation to body fat distribution and menopausal status in obese women. Int J Obesity. 12:465–472.[Medline]
  26. Lindberg UB, Crona N, Silfverstolpe G, Björntorp P, Rebuffé-Scrive M. 1990 Regional adipose tissue metabolism in postmenopausal women after treatment with exogenous sex steroids. Horm Metab Res. 22:345–351.[Medline]
  27. Nicklas BJ, Rogus EM, Colman EG, Goldberg AP. 1996 Visceral adiposity, increased adipocyte lipolysis, and metabolic dysfunction in obese postmenopausal women. Am J Physiol. 270:E72–E78.
  28. Siri WE. 1956 The gross composition of body fat. Adv Biol Med Physiol. 4:239–280.
  29. Meneely GR, Kaltreider NL. 1949 Volume of the lung determined by helium dilution. J Clin Invest. 28:129–139.
  30. Bouchard C. 1985 Reproducibility of body composition and adipose tissue measurements in humans. In: . Roche AF, ed. Body composition assessments in youth and adults, Report of the Sixth Ross Conference on Medical Research. Columbus: Ross Laboratories; 9–14.
  31. Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R. 1988 The Airlie (VA) consensus conference. In: Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R, eds. Anthropometric standardisation reference manual. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 39–80.
  32. Lemieux S, Prud’homme D, Bouchard C, Tremblay A, Despres JP. 1996 A single threshold value of waist girth identifies normal-weight and overweight subjects with excess visceral adipose tissue. Am J Clin Nutr. 64:685–693.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Sjöström L, Kvist H, Cederblad A, Tylen U. 1986 Determination of total adipose tissue and body fat in women by computed tomography40K and tritium. Am J Physiol. 250:E736–E786.
  34. Ferland M, Després JP, Tremblay A, et al. 1989 Assessment of adipose tissue distribution by computed axial tomography in obese women: association with body density and anthropometric measurements. Br J Nutr. 61:139–148.[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Després JP, Prud’homme D, Pouliot MC, Tremblay A, Bouchard C. 1991 Estimation of abdominal fat accumulation from simple anthropometric measurements in men. Am J Clin Nutr. 54:471–477.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Savard R, Deshaies Y, Després JP, et al. 1984 Lipogenesis and lipoprotein lipase activity in human adipose tissue: reproducibility of measurements and relationship with fat cell size. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 62:1448–1452.[Medline]
  37. Rodbell M. 1964 Metabolism of isolated fat cells. I. Effects of hormones on glucose metabolism and lipolysis. J Biol Chem. 239:375–380.[Free Full Text]
  38. Mauriège P, Després JP, Prud’homme D, et al. 1991 Regional variation in adipose tissue lipolysis in lean and obese men. J Lipid Res. 32:1625–1633.[Abstract]
  39. Després JP, Bouchard C, Bukowiecki L, Savard R, Lupien J. 1983 Morphology and metabolism of human fat cells: a reliability study. Int J Obesity. 7:231–240.[Medline]
  40. Richterich R, Dauwwalder H. 1971 Zur bestimmung der plasmaglukose-konzentration mit der hexokinase-glucose-6-phosphat-deshydrogenase-methode. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 101:615–618.[Medline]
  41. Desbuquois B, Aurbach GD. 1971 Use of polyethylene glycol to separate free and antibody-bound peptide hormones in radioimmunoassays. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 37:732–738.
  42. Havel RJ, Eder H, Bragdon HF. 1955 The distribution and chemical composition of utracentrifugally separated lipoproteins in human serum. J Clin Invest. 34:1345–1353.
  43. Moorjani S, Gagné C, Lupien PJ, Brun D. 1986 Plasma triglycerides related decrease in high density lipoprotein cholesterol and its association with myocardial infarction in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Metabolism. 35:311–316.[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Berman DM, Nicklas BJ, Rogus EM, Dennis KE, Goldberg AP. 1998 Regional differences in adrenoceptor binding and fat cell lipolysis in obese, postmenopausal women. Metabolism. 47:467–473.[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Imbeault P, Prud’homme D, Tremblay A, Després JP, Mauriège P. Adipose tissue metabolism in young and middle-aged men after control for body fatness. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. In press.
  46. Lafontan M, Berlan M. 1995 Fat cell {alpha}2-adrenoceptors: the regulation of fat cell function and lipolysis. Endocr Rev. 16:716–738.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Hoffman BB, Chang H, Farahbakhsh ZT, Reaven GM. 1984 Age-related decrement in hormone-stimulated lipolysis. Am J Physiol. 247:E772–E777.
  48. Hoffman BB, Chang H, Farahbakhsh Z, Reaven G. 1984 Inhibition of lipolysis by adenosine is potentiated with age. J Clin Invest. 74:1750–1755.
  49. Lönnqvist F, Nyberg B, Wahrenberg H, Arner P. 1990 Catecholamine-induced lipolysis in adipose tissue of the elderly. J Clin Invest. 85:1614–1621.
  50. Després JP, Tremblay A, Leblanc C, Bouchard C. 1988 Effect of the amount of body fat on the age-associated increase in serum cholesterol. Prev Med. 17:423–431.[CrossRef][Medline]
  51. Tchernof A, Labrie F, Bélanger A, Després JP. 1996 Obesity and metabolic complications: contribution of dehydroepiandrostérone and other steroid hormones. J Endocrinol. 150:S155–S164.
  52. Rebuffé-Scrive M, Marin P, Björntorp P. 1991 Effect of testosterone on abdominal adipose tissue in men. Int J Obesity. 15:791–795.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
S. Viswanadha and C. Londos
Optimized conditions for measuring lipolysis in murine primary adipocytes
J. Lipid Res., August 1, 2006; 47(8): 1859 - 1864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Tchernof, A. Desmeules, C. Richard, P. Laberge, M. Daris, J. Mailloux, C. Rheaume, and P. Dupont
Ovarian Hormone Status and Abdominal Visceral Adipose Tissue Metabolism
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2004; 89(7): 3425 - 3430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. B. Pedersen, K. Kristensen, P. A. Hermann, J. A. Katzenellenbogen, and B. Richelsen
Estrogen Controls Lipolysis by Up-Regulating {alpha}2A-Adrenergic Receptors Directly in Human Adipose Tissue through the Estrogen Receptor {alpha}. Implications for the Female Fat Distribution
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2004; 89(4): 1869 - 1878.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. C. Carr
The Emergence of the Metabolic Syndrome with Menopause
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2003; 88(6): 2404 - 2411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. Hoffstedt, E. Naslund, and P. Arner
Calpain-10 Gene Polymorphism Is Associated with Reduced {beta}3-Adrenoceptor Function in Human Fat Cells
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2002; 87(7): 3362 - 3367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
M. Ryden, G. Faulds, J. Hoffstedt, A. Wennlund, and P. Arner
Effect of the (C825T) G{beta}3 Polymorphism on Adrenoceptor-Mediated Lipolysis in Human Fat Cells
Diabetes, May 1, 2002; 51(5): 1601 - 1608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
P. Lofgren, J. Hoffstedt, M. Ryden, A. Thorne, C. Holm, H. Wahrenberg, and P. Arner
Major Gender Differences in the Lipolytic Capacity of Abdominal Subcutaneous Fat Cells in Obesity Observed before and after Long-Term Weight Reduction
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2002; 87(2): 764 - 771.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Meijssen, M. C. Cabezas, C. G. M. Ballieux, R. J. Derksen, S. Bilecen, and D. W. Erkelens
Insulin Mediated Inhibition of Hormone Sensitive Lipase Activity in Vivo in Relation to Endogenous Catecholamines in Healthy Subjects
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2001; 86(9): 4193 - 4197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mauriège, P.
Right arrow Articles by Després, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mauriège, P.
Right arrow Articles by Després, J. P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals