help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ercan-Fang, S.
Right arrow Articles by Oppenheimer, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ercan-Fang, S.
Right arrow Articles by Oppenheimer, J. H.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 85, No. 6 2299-2303
Copyright © 2000 by The Endocrine Society


Original Studies

Quantitative Assessment of Pituitary Resistance to Thyroid Hormone from Plots of the Logarithm of Thyrotropin Versus Serum Free Thyroxine Index1

Sean Ercan-Fang, Harold L. Schwartz, Cary N. Mariash and Jack H. Oppenheimer

Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455

Address correspondence and requests for reprints to: Jack H. Oppenheimer, M.D., University of Minnesota, Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, 6-124-PWB, 516 Delaware Street SE, Box 101, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Previous studies have shown that, in patients with primary alterations in thyroid hormone secretion, the level of the natural logarithm of serum TSH (lnTSH) is negatively related to the level of free T4. Because such patients can generally be assumed to exhibit normal tissue responsivity to thyroid hormone, we were interested in determining whether the lnTSH/free T4 index (FTI) relationship in patients with established thyroid hormone resistance (THR) exhibit a lower slope than patients with normal tissue sensitivity to thyroid hormone. We have therefore analyzed the relationship between the lnTSH and the FTI in members of three families with documented THR. In these patients, a given dose of T4 was maintained for a 1- to 2-month period, to achieve hormonal equilibration. Two of the families, though not related, exhibited the same mutation, E460K. The third was identified as A317T. As anticipated, the slope of the lnTSH/FTI ratio was significantly lower in the patients with THR than in T4-treated patients who were presumed to have normal sensitivity to thyroid hormone. The slope of the lnTSH/FTI relationship seemed to be characteristic of the specific mutation involved in the three genotypes (wild-type and two mutations) examined. Further, the in vivo slope of the lnTSH/FTI relationship seemed to be linearly related to the T3 association constant of the in vitro translated receptor. These findings support the potential usefulness of measuring the slope of lnTSH, as a function of the FTI, in quantitating pituitary THR.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
IN 1967, Refetoff et al. first described the syndrome of resistance to thyroid hormone (RTH). This disorder is characterized at the pituitary level by impairment of thyroid-hormone induced suppression of pituitary TSH secretion. Most often, patients with central resistance also display thyroid hormone resistance (THR) at a peripheral level. The clinical effects of the mutation thus represent the balance of the central and peripheral effects. To date, some 600 patients have been reported in an international registry (1, 2), suggesting that the prevalence of the disorder is much larger than had been originally suspected. Most often, RTH is caused by a point mutation of the gene coding for the thyroid hormone ß receptor (TRß) in exon 9 or 10 and results in an amino acid substitution in the T3-binding segment of the receptor. The vast majority of patients with this disorder present in the heterozygous state, wherein the mutated gene exerts a dominant negative influence in suppressing the effect of the paired wild-type gene. This explains the autosomal dominant mode of transmission of the trait.

The clinical features of the THR syndrome (3) and its molecular basis have been extensively reviewed (4, 5). The mutated receptor has been implicated in delayed bone and CNS maturation in some patients. In such patients, RTH in these peripheral tissues is not adequately compensated by an appropriate increase in thyroid hormone secretion, even though there is reduced suppression of TSH secretion at the pituitary and hypothalamic level. Other patients exhibit symptoms of peripheral hyperthyroidism because THR in the central pituitary-hypothalamic area exceeds that observed at the peripheral level. Theoretically, if resistance at the central level were perfectly matched to peripheral resistance, one would not expect any clinical manifestations of the disorder, with the exception of the thyroid enlargement accompanying overproduction of TSH. These considerations may well explain the broad diversity of responses associated with thyroid hormone receptor mutations.

From a practical point of view, suspicion of RTH rests on the identification of patients with goiter or a history of goiter who exhibit an inappropriately high TSH value for a given value of the free T4 index (FTI). We here present data suggesting that the degree of THR at the central level can be assessed, at least in some patients, from the slope of the natural logarithm of serum TSH (lnTSH)/FTI ratio, as generated by incremental changes in the daily dose of L-T4 administered in the course of clinical management designed to define the optimal treatment dose of L-T4. In the three mutations studied, the degree of THR assessed in vivo correlates with the T3 affinity of the in vitro translated receptor.

The present studies were initiated independently of earlier reports by Hayashi et al. (6) and Yagi et al. (7). Hayashi calculated in vitro resistance on the basis of the relationship between the increment in free T4 induced by the injection TRH and the association constant determined in vitro. In these studies, the authors noted that, in 12 mutations studied, there was a clear correlation between the association constant determined in vitro and the in vivo measurements; but no such correlation could be established in 6 other mutations.

In the present study, we have also explored the feasibility of assessing the in vivo association constant from the slope of the lnTSH as a function of the FTI.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patient-related information

Patients were under the care of members of the Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes. Written permission for the performance of these studies and the genotyping of the suspected TRß mutation was provided by all subjects, in line with the policies adopted by the Human Research Committee of the University of Minnesota.

The T4 index used in this study is the product of the total serum T4 multiplied by a serum-binding correction factor, as determined by standard techniques (8). The product of the free T3 fraction multiplied by the total serum T4 concentration generated a value that we have shown to be proportional to the level free T4 (Sandhoffer, C. R., J. H. Oppenheimer, C. N. Mariash, and D. Brown, unpublished observations). Twenty-four-hour Holter monitoring and evaluation of cardiac parameters were obtained with the assistance of the Division of Cardiology. Achilles-tendon relaxation time was measured using a kinemometer (10).

Patient histories

Patient A1 (index patient). Patient A1, a 24-yr-old graduate student, was referred to us in 1994 for evaluation of her thyroid status. She indicated that in 1987 she developed tachycardia and thyroid enlargement and exhibited elevated levels of thyroid hormone, features which led her physicians, at the time, to the diagnosis of hyperthyroidism, presumably as a result of Graves’ disease. Treatment with radioiodine led to alleviation of her symptoms but resulted in the subsequent development of hypothyroidism. The specific issue that prompted her referral to us in 1994 was the difficulty in establishing a L-T4 replacement regime that would result in the simultaneous normalization of serum thyroid hormones and TSH. These findings raised the possibility of RTH. A normal magnetic resonance imaging of the pituitary gland and a normal level of the {alpha}-subunit of pituitary glycoprotein excluded the possibility of a pituitary TSH-producing tumor. Initially, her heart rate was noted to be mildly elevated; but after discontinuation of nortriptyline, which had been prescribed for mood disorder, her heart rate normalized, as confirmed by Holter monitoring. Achilles-tendon relaxation time, serum lipid values, sex hormone-binding globulin, urinary excretion of pyridinoline, and deoxypyridinoline were normal. These negative findings, together with persistent elevations of TSH levels for given levels of serum thyroid hormones, led to the diagnosis of THR.

Patient A2. This patient is the father of Patient A1. He was 58 yr old at the time of these studies. At age 24, Patient A2 developed symptoms and signs that were attributed to an attack of so-called thyroid storm. This was successfully treated with radioiodine. Medical records, documenting presenting symptoms and signs, are no longer available. The patient is currently maintained on 200 µg L-T4 per day. Although blood samples were provided, the patient declined further evaluation.

Patient B1. This patient was first seen at the University of Minnesota in 1986, at age 46, for an evaluation of her thyroid status. In 1971, she was treated with T3 tablets, presumably to shrink her goiter. T3 was stopped in 1981 and L-T4 substituted. In 1985, she was treated with 6 mCi 131I, to shrink her goiter. Subsequently, her TSH was noted to be more than 64 mIU/L and her serum T4 to be 9.0 µg/dL, suggesting the likelihood of THR. Her last set of thyroid function tests in 1986 revealed a serum TSH of 5.8 mIU/L and a T4 index of 21.8.

Patient B2. The daughter of Patient B1 was referred to the University of Minnesota by her mother in 1986 at age 24. She had also been treated with radioiodine for symptoms and signs presumed to be attributable to primary hyperthyroidism. Subsequently, she developed signs, symptoms, and laboratory values of hypothyroidism and was started on thyroid replacement therapy. In April 1986, on an unknown dose of L-T4, she was found to have a high FTI of 17.5 and an elevated TSH of 30 mIU/L.

Patient C1. This patient has been previously reported by Bantle et al. (11) as Case 1.

Patients presumed to exhibit normal sensitivity

Our initial objective in these studies was to compare the relationship between the TSH level and the FTI of patients diagnosed as THR, to that of patients presumed to exhibit normal thyroid hormone sensitivity. We have previously analyzed the relationship between serum TSH and the serum free T4 indices in 157 patients with the following disorders: 1) hyperthyroidism in response to treatment; 2) hypothyroidism treated with progressive increases in L-T4 dose; and 3) thyroid cancer under treatment with L-T4. Because we did not identify, in these groups, any indications of THR, we used the slope measurements in this control population as a reference for quantitating thyroid hormone sensitivity in patients at the pituitary-hypothalamic level.

Molecular biology techniques

Genomic sequencing. Genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral leukocytes using the Wizard (Promega Corp., Madison, WI) peripheral genomic DNA isolation system. Using specific synthesized oligomeric primers (12), TRß exons 9 and 10 were PCR-amplified (Expand PCR System, Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN) using 1 µg of genomic DNA from each patient (denaturation, 94.0 C for 10 sec; annealing, 55.0 C for 30 sec; elongation, 68.0 C for 2 min for 30 cycles). Controls in which polymerase or genomic DNA was omitted were included. PCR products were individually gel-isolated [4% NuSeive Agarose (FMC, Rockland, ME) in 0.5 x Tris-Acetate-EDTA], extracted using QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (QIAGEN, Chatsworth, CA) and eluted in 50 µl Tris-EDTA. One microliter of the eluted product was reamplified using the same primers and was gel-isolated as above. The exons were initially sequenced using the Sequenase 2.0 (USB, Cleveland, OH) system with separation on a 5% polyacrylamide denaturing gel and later sequenced using the ABI/Prism Dye-Terminator labeling system with separation on an 310 Genetic Analyzer (Perkin-Elmer Corp., Foster City, CA). Each exon was sequenced completely in both directions, from at least two independent PCR products.

T3 Binding affinity: of wild-type and mutant receptors. The complementary DNA (cDNA) coding for human TRß1 was subcloned from pHE-A1 (gift from Dr. William Chin) into the multiple cloning site of pcDNAI (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA). Both the E460K and A317T mutations were made using QuickChange (Promega Corp., La Jolla, CA) site-directed mutagenesis kit. The presence of the expected mutation was confirmed using the direct sequencing with the ABI/Prism system and the SP6 primer for the E460K mutation or a specific cDNA primer sequence (CCAGAGTGGTGG) for the A317T mutation. Wild-type and mutant thyroid hormone receptors were generated by in vitro transcription (13) and translation (14), and T3-binding affinity was assessed by filter-binding studies using labeled T3 (15).

Transfection studies. A 1.3-Kb rat ßTSH subunit promoter, linked to a luciferase reporter, was kindly provided by Dr. Margaret Shupnik (16). JEG-3 or Neuro-2a (ATCC catalog no. HTB36 and CCL no. 131, respectively) cells were divided to a concentration of approximately 2 million cells/100-cm2 plate, 24 h before transfection using standard medium (DMEM with penicillin/streptomycin) containing FBS that had been stripped of endogenous thyroid hormone (17). Four hours after the incubation media had been refreshed, 10 mg of reporter, 2 mg of a TK-CAT (17) transfection efficiency control, and 10 mg of either wild-type, E460K, or A317T TRß1 expression plasmid or the empty pcDNAI vector were cotransfected using the calcium-phosphate transfection technique (Life Technologies/BRL, Gaithersburg, MD). Eighteen hours later, media were changed to either media with stripped FBS (-T3) or media in which T3 was added back (+T3) to a final concentration of 100 nmol/L. After an additional 24 h of incubation, cells were harvested in lysis buffer with 1 mmol/L fresh dithiothreitol (17) and luciferase (17) and CAT activity (18) subsequently assayed.

During the course of our work, Maia et al. (19) reported a potential cryptic element within the luciferase cDNA that mediated receptor-dependent inhibition of luciferase activity in a JEG-3, COS, and CV-1 cell-line. However, in the Neuro-2a cells used in these experiments, we demonstrated that such negative regulation of luciferase expression failed to occur.

Statistics. Data were analyzed using Systat 5.2.1 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). The relationship between lnTSH and T4I in patients and controls was evaluated by regression analysis. Comparisons between patient groups and transfection groups were made by ANOVA. Significance between groups was calculated by post hoc testing using the Bonferroni adjustment.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Sequencing studies

Sequencing of exons 9 and 10 from genomic DNA, using dideoxysequencing, confirmed the presence of a single heterozygous base-pair substitution in each family. In unrelated families A and B, the mutation resulted in a substitution of lysine for glutamic acid at amino acid position 460 (E460K). This mutation has been previously reported (20). In family C, a threonine was substituted for alanine at amino acid 317 (A317T). This mutation has also been previously reported (21).

Comparison of lnTSH/T4 index relationship in patients with THR to patients presumed to exhibit normal pituitary-hypothalamic sensitivity to thyroid hormone

We have previously described the TSH/FT4I relationships in three clinical groups: 1) patients under treatment for Graves’; 2) patients with spontaneous hypothyroidism who were also under treatment with L-T4; and 3) patients with thyroid cancer who had undergone total thyroidectomy and were at various stages of incremental replacement with L-T4. Although the average daily dose of L-T4 varied between groups that were on thyroid hormone therapy, we did not detect any difference in the TSH/FT4I relationships in these groups.

To exclude the possibility that our previously published analysis of the TSH/FT4I ratio (22) was distorted by the inclusion of patients who had been sampled only at a single time point or had not been challenged by a sufficient increment in L-T4, we recalculated this data base by omitting isolated values as well as data points of individuals who had not been challenged with at least a 2-fold increase in T4 dose. Results of this recalculation are depicted in Fig. 1Go and confirm the results of previous studies of the TSH/FT4 relationship (22, 23), which had pointed to an exponential decrease in TSH with progressive increases in serum T4 in the ranges studied.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Relationship between the FTI and TSH in different subject populations. Normal subjects with an FTI >= 5.0 ({circ}), family A with the E460K mutation ({Delta}), family B with the E460K mutation ({square}), and Patient C with the A317T mutation ({blacktriangleup}). The regression line for normal subjects with an FTI >=5.0 is TSHT4I = 88.74 e-(T4I) x 0.40.

 
Our data indicate that, for the wild-type and the two mutations studied, the function describing the relationship between the serum FTI and the lnTSH were linear in the range studied. Because of the symptoms generated in patients with THR, we did not allow the level of the adjusted T4 (FTI) to fall below a value of 5.0. Therefore, we excluded all values below 5.0 in the hypothyroid control groups as well. Inspection of Fig. 1Go demonstrates that TSH values corresponding to serum T4I values >= 5.0 were well represented by the exponential function.

Thus, TSHT4I = TSH5.0 e-(T4I){lambda}, where TSHT4I is the concentration of TSH at a given level of serum T4I, and TSH5.0 is the concentration of TSH when the T4I is 5.0. The function {lambda} can be regarded as a measure of the sensitivity of pituitary TSH suppression to the ambient level of thyroid hormone. It is apparent, from this equation, that the larger the value of {lambda}, the steeper the slope of the lnTSH plotted as a function of T4I. Moreover, if a hypothetical mutation of the receptor gene completely obliterated TSH suppression by T3, there would be no fall in the TSH level in response to increasing levels of hormone. Under such conditions, the value of {lambda} would be 0.

The data depicted in Fig. 1Go allow us to assess the slope {lambda}: 1) in patients under treatment for thyroid disease; 2) in the two unrelated families (A) and (B) expressing the same mutation (E460K); and 3) in patient C1with the mutation A317T. The linear regression was significant for all three groups of patients (P < 0.023). The regression coefficient for the normal controls was 0.55; for the patients with the E460K mutation, 0.76; and for the patient with the A317T mutation, 0.78. Post hoc analysis showed that the controls differ from each of the mutations, with P < 0.000; whereas the mutations differ from each other, with P = 0.049. The slopes of the two unrelated patients with the same mutation did not differ significantly from each other. As would be expected, the slope of the curve generated by patients with RTH is less than those who are assumed to be normally sensitive to thyroid hormone. When all of the patients with E460K mutation are combined, the ratio of ({lambda}normal)/({lambda}E460K resistant) is approximately 2.5.

Receptor affinity for T3

The finding of statistically significant differences in the slopes of the TSH/T4I relationships among all three groups poses a problem as to the molecular mechanisms responsible for the observed diversity. One possibility is that differences in slope could reflect differences among these receptors in their ability to bind T3. To test this hypothesis, we compared the T3-binding affinity of the wild-type and mutant receptors generated by in vitro transcription and translation. When normalized to the wild-type T3-binding affinity (Ka), the E460K mutation results in a binding affinity 49% of wild-type and the A317T mutation has a binding affinity 10% of wild-type. Previous reports had suggested values of 25% (20) and 13–22% (21), respectively. Comparing the calculated slopes of the lnTSH/T4I relationships with the T3-binding affinity of the receptor for T3 is consistent with a linear relationship (Fig. 2Go). Given the inherent variability in the methods involved, these findings are consonant with the hypothesis that the slope of the lnTSH/T4I curve is strongly influenced by the strength of pituitary sensitivity to T3 at the level of the thyroid hormone receptor.



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Relationship between the measured Ka of wild-type and mutant receptors (mean ± SE) and the calculated regression coefficients of lnTSH/FTI relationship ({lambda}) in the respective subject cohorts (±95% confidence interval). The regression line is {lambda} = -0.124-0.0442 x Ka.

 
The E460K mutation is one amino acid proximal to the AF-2 ({tau}4) domain, which has been shown to exhibit the potential of independent transactivation (24). We therefore considered the possibility that this segment might also play a ligand-independent role in stimulating target gene expression. To test this hypothesis and to gain further insight into the mechanisms of RTH exhibited by these receptors, we cotransfected thyroid hormone receptors (wild-type, E460K, or A317T) and a rat ßTSH-luciferase reporter construct into Neuro-2a cells and measured the response of the reporter construct.

As illustrated in Fig. 3Go, transfection of wild-type thyroid hormone receptor in the absence of T3 resulted in T3-induced reporter activity above that generated by the empty vector. In the presence of T3, however, both the E460K and the A317T mutated receptors transactivate the reporter activity only to levels comparable with that of the wild-type receptor. These findings thus did not support the hypothesis that either of the two unliganded mutant receptors studied could superinduce ßTSH transcription above the level attained by the unliganded wild-type receptor.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Representative experiment comparing the ability of cotransfected thyroid hormone receptor ß1 to transactivate rat TSHß, in a T3-independent manner, in JEG-3 cells. Results (mean ± SD), normalized to wild-type receptor activity, are from a single experiment performed in quadruplicate and corrected for transfection efficiency. Neither the E460K nor the A317T mutants induce luciferase reporter activity above wild-type TRß1 levels in the absence of T3.

 
Figure 4Go also shows that, in the presence of a cotransfected thyroid hormone receptor, the transcriptional activity of the TSH reporter was significantly decreased by thyroid hormone in a dose-dependent manner. When the data at 1 and 10 nmol/L were subject to ANOVA, we found that the A317T response was significantly less than that of the wild-type receptor; and the response of the E470K, at 10 nmol/L, was also less than that of the wild-type. To characterize better the dose/response relationship, all the data were fitted to a four-parameter logistic-log regression equation to calculate the ED50 (dose that yields 50% of the maximum response) to T3 (25). We found that the ED50 correlated very well with the receptor-binding affinity. Thus, the wild-type receptor had the lowest ED50 at 0.424 nmol/L T3, the E470K mutation had an intermediate value at 0.652 nmol/L T3, and the A317T mutation required the highest dose of T3 at 3.6 nmol/L to suppress transcription by 50% of the maximum response. The relative response to each of these receptors also correlated with the in vivo dose/response data depicted in Fig. 1Go. Despite the differences in affinity for T3, all three receptors suppressed the TSH transcriptional activity to the same level, at very high concentrations of thyroid hormone.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Representative dose-response experiment demonstrating that T3 is capable of suppressing basal transcription of a rat TSHß reporter with both E460K and A317T TRß1 mutants in JEG-3 cells. Results (mean ± SD), normalized to basal reporter activity, are from a single experiment performed in quadruplicate and corrected for transfection efficiency. WT, Wild type.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The identification and management of patients with RTH presents a fundamental challenge. There are two general scenarios for their presentation: 1) patients who present, during childhood, with a combination of signs and symptoms, including attention deficit disorder, mild learning difficulties, and growth retardation, together with clinical features suggestive of hypothyroidism or mild hyperthyroidism; and 2) patients who do not exhibit the associated neurological signs or symptoms and who lack the developmental deficits but who do show clinical and laboratory features that are often mistaken for primary hyperthyroidism. Both groups will show the presence of a goiter, and both are characterized by point mutations in exons 9 and 10 of the TRß situated on chromosome 3. Both show patterns of dominant Mendelian inheritance. The patients described in this report belong to the second group above, i.e. patients without a history of developmental skeletal or neurological deficits.

One of the requirements essential in the diagnosis of RTH is the demonstration that the pituitary shares this resistance. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no reports of patients with selective peripheral resistance at the molecular level but with normal pituitary sensitivity. A higher level of free T4 is required to achieve a given level of TSH in a patient with RTH than in a subject with normal sensitivity to thyroid hormone.

A major question, first posed by Hayashi et al. (6), is whether the reduction in the affinity of T3 binding to the receptor, as determined in vitro, correlates with the pituitary resistance as assessed in vivo. The latter was measured by the response to the incremental administration of liothyronine (T3) over a period of 3 days. They concluded that, among the mutations studied, the majority of cases showed a positive correlation between in vitro and in vivo measurements. However, a subset failed to show a significant correlation.

The data generated in Fig. 1Go in the present paper suggest that the laboratory diagnosis of pituitary RTH can also be made by assessing the slope of the lnTSH as a function of the free T4 concentration or the FTI. Although only two mutations were studied by us, one of which appeared in two unrelated families, there are, to the best of our knowledge, no reports defining receptor mutations that are clinically significant but show normal pituitary suppressibility. Moreover, from a practical clinical point of view, administration of graded doses of LT4 to the patient with THR is often useful in choosing the optimal thyroid hormone dose to suit the overall metabolic needs of the patient.

Caution should be exercised to make certain that the patient is fully equilibrated on a given dose of L-T4 and that the possibility of a pituitary TSH-producing tumor is excluded by a serum measurement of the {alpha}-subunit of pituitary glycoprotein.


    Acknowledgments
 
We acknowledge the assistance of Dr. Jeanette Risdahl for her referral of Patient A1 to the Thyroid Research Unit. We thank Dr. David Homans for obtaining the echocardiographic parameters in Patient A1, and the Clinical Endocrine Laboratory personnel for their invaluable assistance in collecting and maintaining patient serum samples. We appreciate the very useful discussions with Dr. Christopher Bingham, with regard to the statistical analysis and presentation of the data. We thank Dr. Grant Anderson for his insightful criticism and assistance. We also thank Daniel Oas, Ruby Larson, and Jennifer French for their laboratory expertise, and Maria Purvey and Heather Tungren for their expert editorial support.


    Footnotes
 
1 Supported by the following grants: NRSA D-08993 (to S.E.-F.) NIH RO1-AM19812 (to J.H.O.), RO1-DK32885 (to C.N.M.), and P30-DK50456 (to C.N.M.). Back

Received April 19, 1999.

Revised July 22, 1999.

Revised October 28, 1999.

Accepted March 11, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Brucker-Davis F, Skarulis MC, Grace MB, et al. 1995 Genetic and clinical features of 42 kindred with resistance of thyroid hormone. Ann Intern Med. 123:572–583.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Refetoff S, Weiss RE. 1997 Resistance to thyroid hormones. In: Thakker RV, ed. Molecular genetics of endocrine disorders. London: Chapman & Hall; 85–122.
  3. Beck-Peccoz P, Chatterjee VK. 1994 The variable clinical phenotype in thyroid hormone resistance syndrome. Thyroid. 4:225–232.[Medline]
  4. Collingwood TN, Adams M, Tone Y, Chatterjee VK. 1994 Spectrum of transcriptional, dimerization, and dominant negative properties of twenty different mutant thyroid hormone beta-receptors in thyroid hormone resistance syndrome. Mol Endocrinol. 8:1262–1277.[Abstract]
  5. Yoh SM, Chatterjee VK, Privalsky ML. 1997 Thyroid hormone resistance syndrome manifests as an aberrant interaction between mutant T3 receptors and transcriptional corepressors. Mol Endocrinol. 11:470–480.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Hayashi Y, Weiss RE, Sarne DH, et al. 1995 Do clinical manifestations of resistance to thyroid hormone correlate with the functional alteration of the corresponding mutant thyroid hormone-beta receptors? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 80:3246–3256.[Abstract]
  7. Yagi H, Pohlenz J, Hayashi Y, Sakurai A, Refetoff S. 1997 Resistance to thyroid hormone caused by two mutant thyroid hormone receptors beta, R243Q and R243W, with marked impairment of function that cannot be explained by altered in vitro 3,5,3'-triiodothyronine binding affinity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 82:1608–1614.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Wong ET, Steffes MW. 1984 A fundamental approach to the diagnosis of diseases of the thyroid gland. Clin Lab Med. 4:655–670.[Medline]
  9. Deleted in proof.
  10. Nuttall FQ, Doe RP. 1964 The Achilles reflex in thyroid disorders: a critical evaluation. Ann Intern Med. 61:269–288.
  11. Bantle JP, Seeling S, Mariash CN, Ulstrom RA, Oppenheimer JH. 1982 Resistance of thyroid hormone: a disorder frequently confused with Graves’ disease. Arch Intern Med. 142:1867–1871.[Abstract]
  12. Takeda K, Weiss RE, Refetoff S. 1992 Rapid localization of mutations in the thyroid hormone receptor-beta gene by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis in 18 families with thyroid hormone resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 74:712–719.[Abstract]
  13. Freake HC, Santos A, Goldberg Y, Ghysdael J, Oppenheimer JH. 1988 Differences in antibody recognition of the triiodothyronine nuclear receptor and c-erbA products. Mol Endocrinol. 2:986–991.[Abstract]
  14. Schwartz HL, Strait KA, Ling NC, Oppenheimer JH. 1992 Quantitation of rat tissue thyroid hormone binding receptor isoforms by immunoprecipitation of nuclear triiodothyronine binding capacity. J Biol Chem. 267:11794–11799.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Samuels HH, Tsai JS, Casanova J, Stanley F. 1974 Thyroid hormone action: in vitro characterization of solubilized nuclear receptors from rat liver and cultured GH1 cells. J Clin Invest. 54:853–865.
  16. Shupnik MA, Greenspan SL, Ridgway EC. 1986 Transcriptional regulation of thyrotropin subunit genes by thyrotropin-releasing hormone and dopamine in pituitary cell culture. J Biol Chem. 261:12675–12679.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Strait KA, Zou L, Oppenheimer JH. 1992 B1 isoform-specific regulation of a triiodothyronine-induced gene during cerebellar development. Mol Endocrinol. 6:1874–1880.[Abstract]
  18. Hagen SG, Larson RJ, Strait KA, Oppenheimer JH. 1996 A Purkinje cell protein-2 intronic thyroid hormone response element binds developmentally regulated thyroid hormone receptor-nuclear protein complexes. J Mol Neurosci. 7:245–255.[Medline]
  19. Maia AL, Harney JW, Larsen PR. 1996 Is there a negative TRE in the luciferase reporter cDNA?. Thyroid. 6:325–328.[Medline]
  20. Adams M, Matthews C, Collingwood TN, Tone Y, Beck-Peccoz P, Chatterjee K. 1994 Genetic analysis of 29 kindreds with generalized and pituitary resistance to thyroid hormone. Identification of thirteen novel mutations in the thyroid hormone receptor beta gene. J Clin Invest. 94:506–515.
  21. Parrilla R, Mixson AJ, McPherson JA, McClaskey JH, Weintraub BD. 1991 Characterization of seven novel mutations of the c-erbA beta gene in unrelated kindreds with generalized thyroid hormone resistance. Evidence for two "hot spot" regions of the ligand binding domain. J Clin Invest. 88:2123–2130.
  22. Burmeister LA, Goumaz MO, Mariash CN, Oppenheimer JH. 1992 Levothyroxine dose requirements for thyrotropin suppression in the treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 75:344–350.[Abstract]
  23. Spencer CA, LoPresti JS, Patel A, et al. 1990 Application of a new chemiluminometric thyrotropin assay to subnormal measurement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 70:453–460.[Abstract]
  24. Baniahmad A, Thormeyer D, Renkawitz R. 1997 tau4/tau c/AF-2 of the thyroid hormone receptor relieves silencing of the retinoic acid receptor silencer core independent of both tau4 activation function and full dissociation of corepressors. Mol Cell Biol. 17:4259–4271.[Abstract]
  25. Munson PJ, Rodbard D. 1984 Computerized analysis of ligand binding data: basic principles and recent developments. In: Rodbard D, Forti G, eds. Computers in endocrinology. New York: Raven; 117–146.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
B. R. Huber, B. Sandler, B. L. West, S. T. Cunha Lima, H. T. Nguyen, J. W. Apriletti, J. D. Baxter, and R. J. Fletterick
Two Resistance to Thyroid Hormone Mutants with Impaired Hormone Binding
Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2003; 17(4): 643 - 652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ercan-Fang, S.
Right arrow Articles by Oppenheimer, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ercan-Fang, S.
Right arrow Articles by Oppenheimer, J. H.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals