help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mather, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mather, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, T. J.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 85, No. 5 1851-1856
Copyright © 2000 by The Endocrine Society


Original Studies

Normal Endothelial Function Despite Insulin Resistance in Healthy Women with the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome1

Kieren J. Mather2, Subodh Verma3, Bernard Corenblum and Todd J. Anderson4

Divisions of Endocrinology (K.J.M., B.C.) and Cardiology (S.V., T.J.A.), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 2T9

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Todd J. Anderson, M.D., F.R.C.P.C., Division of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary c849, 1403 29th Street NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 2T9. E-mail: todd.anderson{at}crha-health.ab.ca


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Women with the polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) carry a number of cardiovascular risk factors, including insulin resistance, lipid abnormalities, and an altered pattern of sex steroid exposure. Noninvasive measurements of endothelial function, which can demonstrate abnormalities well in advance of clinically apparent disease, have not been previously reported in this patient group.

We undertook a cross-sectional evaluation of endothelium-dependent and -independent vascular function using brachial artery ultrasound. We studied healthy women with clinical and laboratory evidence of PCOS (n = 18) and age-matched controls (n = 19), not taking any antihypertensive, cholesterol-lowering, or hormonal therapies. Laboratory parameters of insulin resistance, glycemia, cholesterol status, and hormone levels were also measured. Despite marked differences in glucose/insulin ratio [6.1 ± 1.1 mmol/pmol (PCOS) vs. 9.9 ± 0.6 (controls)] and free androgen index [11.9 ± 2.3 (PCOS) vs. 3.7 ± 0.6 (controls); normal, <5], we did not find evidence of impaired endothelial function in our patients with PCOS. Both endothelium-dependent (8.7 ± 3.1%) and endothelium-independent (23.2 ± 3.4%) vascular responses were normal, and practically identical to the responses seen in the control group (endothelium-dependent, 9.0 ± 0.7; endothelium-independent, 23.0 ± 1.2%). The PCOS women were more obese, but baseline brachial arterial diameters were not different between groups. There was no correlation between degree of insulin resistance or hyperandrogenism and the brachial response.

This group of healthy obese young women with insulin resistance and hyperandrogenism due to PCOS had normal endothelium-dependent and -independent vascular responses compared to age-matched controls. The factors resulting in preservation of these response are unclear and warrant further investigation.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
POLYCYSTIC OVARY syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrinopathy affecting premenopausal women (1). PCOS has been recently recognized to be a multifaceted metabolic disease linked with insulin resistance (1, 2), analogous to the dysmetabolic syndrome (syndrome X). Approximately 75% of patients with PCOS are insulin resistant (2) and demonstrate an increased incidence of diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia (3, 4, 5, 6, 7). Furthermore, these women have prolonged hyperandrogenism, and their ovulatory disturbance results in preserved estrogen exposure but a deficit in progesterone production (1). Although data regarding cardiovascular disease prevalence and outcomes among women with PCOS are limited, they do suggest a higher risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes (5, 8, 9, 10).

Metabolic and hormonal alterations have long been recognized to have relevance in the genesis of cardiovascular disease. More recently, the potential role of insulin resistance in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease has come under investigation. Simple, noninvasive testing of endothelial function (11) provides the ability to demonstrate vascular abnormalities in asymptomatic patients with traditional cardiovascular risk factors (12). Abnormalities have been demonstrated in the presence of insulin resistance without traditional cardiovascular risk factors (13). This technique is sensitive to alterations in cholesterol status even in young patients (14), and changes in vascular reactivity have been demonstrated across the menstrual cycle in healthy young women (15). This measure correlates with direct coronary measures of vascular reactivity (16), although no direct link to cardiovascular outcome has been established to date with any measure of vascular reactivity.

Sex steroids also have important effects on cardiovascular disease and endothelial function (17, 18, 19). Overall, available data support the historical supposition that in women, estrogen and progesterone in physiological concentrations confer vascular protection relative to androgens, although the details of this protection remain poorly understood.

Women with PCOS present the opportunity to examine the combined effects of insulin resistance and sex steroid abnormalities on cardiovascular health. Endothelial function among these women has not been reported to date. We therefore set out to perform a cross-sectional assessment of endothelium-dependent and -independent responses using brachial artery ultrasound in healthy obese, insulin-resistant women with PCOS.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subjects

Healthy patients without known cardiovascular risk factors participated in a cross-sectional study of endothelial function, measured using brachial artery ultrasound. Patients with a clinical diagnosis of polycystic ovarian syndrome (menstrual irregularity and/or infertility plus clinical and laboratory evidence of hyperandrogenism) were recruited from our out-patient endocrinology clinic (n = 18). Age-matched control patients were recruited from our local hospital and clinic support staff and nurses (n = 19). Exclusion criteria included age over 40 yr, hypertension (blood pressure, >140/90 mm Hg), hypercholesterolemia (total cholesterol, >6.2 mmol/L), current smoking, known cardiovascular disease (not including valvular heart disease), diabetes mellitus, renal failure (creatinine, >150 µmol/L), and current treatment with antihypertensive, antiandrogenic, or estrogenic medications. This project was approved by our institution’s ethical review board, and all subjects gave full informed written consent.

Brachial ultrasound

Vascular reactivity was assessed using brachial artery ultrasound. A 7.5-MHz linear phased array ultrasound transducer was used to image the dominant arm brachial artery longitudinally just above the antecubital fossa. After an overnight fast, all patients rested for 10–15 min in a quiet room at room temperature. After a baseline image was obtained, a blood pressure cuff was inflated to 200 mm Hg on the distal portion of the arm for 5 min and then released. The increased flow in the artery after removal of the blood pressure cuff is termed reactive hyperemia and results in flow-mediated dilation (FMD) (20). Images were obtained for the first 2 min after cuff deflation. This FMD was used as a measure of endothelium-dependent vasodilation (21, 22). The brachial artery was then allowed to return to normal (5 min), and repeat baseline images were obtained. Then, 0.3 mg sublingual nitroglycerin were given, and the brachial artery was imaged for the ensuing 4 min. The response to nitroglycerin is a measure of endothelium-independent vasodilation (23). Blood pressure and heart rate were recorded during each stage of the investigation.

Analysis

Images were recorded on VHS videotape. Three sequential end-diastolic frames for each intervention (baseline, reactive hyperemia, repeat baseline, and nitroglycerin) were digitized and saved to a computer. Previous studies have shown that maximal arterial dilatation occurs 1 min after cuff deflation and 3 min after the administration of nitroglycerin (24). Arterial diameter was determined over a 1-cm straight segment by locally developed software. The average diameter from each of the three frames was used to calculate the end point of interest, which was the percent diameter change in the brachial artery in response to reactive hyperemia or nitroglycerin. In our laboratory, the intraobserver and interobserver variability for repeated measurements are 0 ± 0.02 and 0.03 ± 0.11 mm, respectively. When reactive hyperemia studies are performed on 2 separate days, the mean difference in brachial vasodilator response in absolute terms is 3.1 ± 2.9%.

Laboratory

Insulin resistance was estimated using the ratio of simultaneous steady state (fasting) insulin and glucose measurements. This ratio has been shown to correlate well with more formal dynamic and steady state measurements of insulin resistance in women with PCOS (25). Fasting bloodwork was collected after the ultrasound study, measuring insulin sensitivity, lipid levels, and sex steroid levels. All assays were performed in our local hospital’s clinical laboratory. Insulin levels were measured using a double antibody RIA (Pharmacia & Upjohn, Inc., Mississauga, Canada), with observed intraassay coefficients of variation of 2.4% at 51 pmol/L and 6.1% at 741 pmol/L. the interassay coefficient of variation is reported at 5.8% across the range of standards. Insulin measurements were performed in duplicate in a single laboratory.

Standard methodologies for glucose, cholesterol, and triglyceride measurements were used. 17ß-Estradiol levels were measured with a RIA kit (ICN, Costa Mesa, CA). Testosterone and progesterone levels were measured with a chemiluminescent immunoassay (Chiron Corp., Markham, Canada), and sex hormone-binding globulin levels were assessed with an immunoradiometric assay (Farmos Diagnostica, Sweden). The free androgen index was calculated from the total testosterone and sex hormone-binding globulin levels.

Studies were performed in the morning, after an overnight fast. Women with PCOS, who by definition had irregular or unpredictable menstrual bleeding, were studied at random with regard to their menstrual timing. Control subjects were studied between days 5 and 10 of their menstrual cycle (early to midfollicular phase), at which time the endogenous sex steroid levels are low and most comparable to those typical of women with PCOS.

Statistics

Statistical analysis was performed using StatView 5.0 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC). When data were normally distributed, unpaired t tests were used to compare parameters between groups. The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare parameters between groups when the data were skewed. Pearson’s correlations with r to z significance calculations were performed. Predictors of brachial artery vasodilator responses to reactive hyperemia were obtained by univariate regression analysis. Those with P < 0.05 were entered into a multivariate regression model. Statistical significance was defined as a two-sided P < 0.05. All data are expressed as the mean ± SE.

In our laboratory the typical SDfor flow-mediated dilation measurements is about 3%. To find a clinically relevant difference of 3% in FMD (i.e. a normal FMD of 9% in controls and <6% in PCOS subjects) with ß = 0.85 and {alpha} = 0.05, we therefore set recruitment targets of 18 patients in each group.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Baseline characteristics

Patient characteristics are presented in Table 1Go. Normal lipid and blood pressure values were as expected in light of our exclusion criteria; although within the normal range, the PCOS patients had higher blood pressure and higher low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels than the control patients. Of note, the high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels were well within the protective range for both groups. The PCOS patients were moderately obese, and the groups differed significantly with regard to body mass index (BMI) and waist/hip ratio. The women with PCOS had evidence of insulin resistance; they were hyperinsulinemic compared to the controls (Table 1Go), and the glucose/insulin ratio (GIR) was significantly lower (Table 1Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Comparison of anthropomorphic and laboratory data from the PCOS patients and controls

 
The estrogen levels were comparable between groups by design (Table 1Go). Two patients in the PCOS group had progesterone levels in the luteal phase range, resulting in different means between the groups. Excluding these two patients from all analyses resulted in comparable mean progesterone levels between groups, but did not change our results. As expected, the androgen levels were significantly higher among the women with PCOS, and these levels were strongly correlated with the calculated insulin resistance index (r = 0.671; P < 0.001; see Table 4Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Simple correlations of metabolic and hormonal parameters with the glucose/insulin ratio (GIR)

 
Vascular reactivity

There was no difference in endothelium-dependent (FMD) or endothelium-independent (NTG) vascular responses between the women with PCOS and the normal healthy controls (Table 2Go and Fig. 1Go). Despite the difference in BMI, the groups were well matched for baseline brachial arterial diameter (Table 2Go), which is the principal determinant of vascular response (11). This allows comparison of vascular responses between the groups despite the difference in BMI.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Brachial artery responses, expressed as percent dilation from baseline

 


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Brachial artery responses for the PCOS and control women. No difference was seen in the FMD response (percentage; top) or the NTG response (percentage; bottom) between the women with PCOS and the controls.

 
Tables 3Go and 4Go examine correlations of various metabolic parameters with FMD and insulin resistance. FMD (Table 3Go) was not significantly correlated with any of the measured hormonal parameters, in particular with GIR or free androgen index. Insulin resistance (Table 4Go), on the other hand, did correlate significantly with BMI, waist/hip ratio, free androgen index, LDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Simple correlations of various metabolic and hormonal parameters with brachial flow-mediated dilation (FMD) response

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Despite marked differences in insulin resistance and hyperandrogenism relative to those in control patients, we did not find evidence of impaired endothelial function in our patients with clinically defined PCOS. The endothelium-dependent and -independent vascular responses were normal in both the PCOS and control women. There are two reasons to attempt to match for body weight: to match any metabolic effects related to body size and to match the baseline brachial diameter. From the viewpoint of metabolic status, unmatched weight biases in favor of finding abnormalities in the more obese group. Although our groups were not equivalently obese, the baseline brachial arterial diameters were not different. As this is the principal determinant of dilatory response magnitude (11), this comparison between groups can be made.

The PCOS patients had higher blood pressure, total cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol than controls. These differences would be expected to bias against the PCOS patients in the measurement of vascular reactivity, but despite this we found normal conduit vessel responses. Our statistical power was conservatively established to find a clinically meaningful absolute difference in FMD of 3% between groups 85% of the time this sample size was used. From the observed results, the risk of falsely accepting the null hypothesis (committing a type 2 statistical error) is only 5.8%. In other words, we were powered to detect a minimal, but clinically relevant, difference, but found no difference between groups despite biases in favor of finding a difference. Therefore, we believe that the result is true and not an artifact of study design.

CV risk in PCOS

Women with PCOS typically carry greater cardiovascular risk than women without PCOS, including having an increased prevalence of hypertension, unfavorable lipid profiles, and insulin resistance/type 2 diabetes (3, 4, 5, 6). These components of the dysmetabolic syndrome (syndrome X) predict cardiovascular events in other populations (26, 27) and have been linked with endothelial dysfunction in the forearm and coronary vasculatures (28). Furthermore, there is now evidence that the rate and severity of cardiovascular disease may be increased among women with PCOS (7, 10), supporting the extrapolation of the available epidemiological data to this group. Our results are therefore unexpected.

Endothelial function

At present, there are no reports directly examining endothelial function in women with PCOS. One group has examined cardiac dynamics, which are in part determined by endothelial factors, among women with PCOS (29). Their patients were lean hyperinsulinemic women with PCOS and were found to have unfavorable changes in variables of cardiac flow that correlated with fasting serum insulin levels, but not with androgen levels. Paradisi et al. presented results in abstract form (30) documenting markedly diminished endothelium-dependent and insulin-mediated flow responses in the femoral artery among women with PCOS, with a dominant dependence of flow response on androgen levels. The question of the relative roles of hyperandrogenism and insulin resistance remains open.

We did not find a dependence of brachial artery endothelium-dependent responses on ambient insulin resistance. Studies showing a link between endothelial function and insulin resistance have been reported (13, 31, 32), but these studies are countered by evidence against such a relationship (33, 34), and this question is unanswered. In particular, the effects of physiological or pharmacological modifiers on this relationship, for example sex steroids, have not been systematically studied.

Two studies of the relationship between insulin resistance and vascular function have included female subjects. Serne et al. studied skin microvascular responses to topical application of acetylcholine in 18 normotensive, glucose-tolerant subjects, 12 of whom were female (35). Within the normal range of insulin resistance, this group showed a dependence of microvascular endothelial function on endogenous insulin resistance. Sung et al. compared hemodynamic responses to mental arithmetic and handgrip between premenopausal obese insulin-resistant women and lean controls (36). They found an exaggerated response to stress among the insulin-resistant women, with a good correlation of GIR with peak stress blood pressure (36). In both of these reports, insulin resistance was found to affect vascular responses despite ongoing physiological sex steroid exposure.

In contrast, our patients’ endothelial function was unaffected by the combination of excess androgen exposure and insulin resistance. It is not clear what accounts for this protection. The observed hyperandrogenemia and insulin resistance were of sufficient degree to expect effects on endothelial function. Furthermore, differences in obesity and metabolic status (in particular, LDL concentrations) should have predisposed against this negative finding. A protective effect of ongoing exposure to sex steroids (despite the shift in androgen/estrogen balance) or the relatively elevated HDL cholesterol levels might account for these observations.

We did not find a dependence of endothelium-dependent or -independent responses on sex steroid levels, including androgen levels. The lack of a negative effect of androgen levels is an important observation, as this is a principal difference among normal women, women with PCOS, and men and might have been predicted to alter endothelial responses directly. There are known effects of menstrual timing on vascular responses among young healthy women (15). Women studied in the early follicular phase have little augmentation of their responses. Our study was designed to allow direct comparison of vascular responses at comparable sex steroid levels between PCOS subjects and controls. However, this may be masking a difference between the groups, for example, in the augmentation of vascular responses afforded by cyclical estrogen exposure. Alternatively, ongoing low level exposure to estrogen may be exerting a favorable effect that helps overcome the influence of both the androgens and the insulin resistance. This is not easily reconciled, though, with the studies discussed above, which did not demonstrate a protection from the effects of insulin resistance despite normal cyclical sex steroid exposures.

A vascular protective role of elevated HDL cholesterol has been proposed previously. A strong favorable relationship of endothelium-dependent responses and HDL cholesterol levels has been reported among men with type 2 diabetes mellitus (37). Also, among 26 patients with coronary disease, including 4 women, abnormal coronary vasomotor responses to endothelium-dependent stimulation were significantly blunted in patients with HDL cholesterol in the top quartile (38). Although no dependence of FMD on any lipid parameter, including HDL, was seen in our patients, this remains a plausible effect that might account for our observations. Furthermore, the interaction of lipid and hormonal effects might result in a more favorable net effect than either factor alone. Perhaps the balance is such that vascular function is relatively preserved until the frank onset of one or more traditional cardiovascular risk factors. In this regard, the exclusion of diabetes mellitus and the young age of the patients studied may have selected for a subset of patients whose vasculature is unaffected by the metabolic alterations due to their PCOS.

Limitations

The difference in BMI between our study groups is an important potential confounding factor in the interpretation of our results. However, as discussed above, the effect of patient size on variation in vascular response is through differences in vessel size, and this parameter was well matched between the groups. The comparison of vascular responses is therefore valid.

We did not measure oxidative stress, although none of our subjects was taking any supplemental antioxidants. However, we cannot rule out a differential oxidative balance between patient groups that might account for our observations.

Although our study population was relatively small, and conclusions arising from our multivariate linear analyses are accordingly limited, the validity of the overall relationships is supported by the expected finding of a dependence of FMD on baseline brachial diameter.

The metabolic profile of our study population was more normal than expected, and therefore, the cumulative effect of the metabolic syndrome was less apparent among our patients than other groups of women with PCOS. However, this allows us to comment on the effect of obesity/insulin resistance in this context without the confounding effects of other risk factors.

Finally, the choice of studying control subjects in the early follicular phase may have masked a difference in overall biology. However, the question of vascular responses at comparable sex steroid levels, which our study was designed to address, in itself is important and relevant to our overall understanding of vascular biology.

Conclusion

Using brachial artery ultrasound, we studied a group of young, obese, insulin-resistant, hyperandrogenemic women with PCOS compared to age-matched controls. With the exception of androgen levels, sex steroid levels were comparable between patients and controls. Despite these metabolic abnormalities, we were unable to demonstrate a defect in endothelium-dependent or endothelium-independent vascular responses. Further, there was no dependence of these responses on the degree of insulin resistance, assessed using the glucose/insulin ratio, or on the free androgen index. Although we were unable to demonstrate a difference between these women with PCOS and controls, this does not rule out the existence of a defect in vascular reactivity in PCOS patients with more overt cardiovascular risks. Protective effects of estrogen exposure and/or elevated HDL cholesterol may have prevented the expected adverse effects of these metabolic factors on vascular responses.


    Acknowledgments
 
We gratefully acknowledge the technical expertise of our ultrasonographers, Deb Houston and Annette Robertson. We are grateful to Dr. Alun Edwards for assistance with patient recruitment. We thank our volunteers for their enthusiastic participation.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by the Alberta Heart and Stroke Foundation. Back

2 Research Fellow of the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research. Back

3 Supported by the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research and the Canadian Diabetes Association. Back

4 Clinical investigator with the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research. Back

Received August 2, 1999.

Revised December 1, 1999.

Accepted January 21, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Franks S. 1995 Polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 333:853–861.[Free Full Text]
  2. Dunaif A. 1997 Insulin resistance and the polycystic ovary syndrome: mechanism and implications for pathogenesis. Endocr Rev. 18:774–800.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Conway GS, Agrawal R, Betteridge DJ, Jacobs HS. 1992 Risk factors for coronary artery disease in lean and obese women with the polycystic ovary syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 37:119–125.[Medline]
  4. Talbott E, Guzick DS, Clerici A, et al. 1995 Coronary heart disease risk factors in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 15:821–826.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Dahlgren E, Janson PO, Johansson S, Lapidus L, Oden A. 1992 Polycystic ovary syndrome and risk for myocardial infarction. Evaluated from a risk factor model based on a prospective population study of women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 71:599–604.[Medline]
  6. Ehrmann DA, Barnes RB, Rosenfield RL, Cavaghan MK, Imperial J. 1999 Prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Diabetes Care. 22:141–146.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Guzick DS. 1996 Cardiovascular risk in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Semin Reprod Endocrinol. 14:45–49.[Medline]
  8. Guzick DS, Talbott EO, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Herzog HC, Kuller LH, Wolfson SK. 1996 Carotid atherosclerosis in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: Initial results from a case-control study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 174:1224–1229.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Birdsall MA, Farquhar CM, White HD. 1997 Association between polycystic ovaries and extent of coronary artery disease in women having cardiac catheterization. Ann Intern Med. 126:32–35.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Pierpoint T, McKeigue PM, Isaacs AJ, Wild SH, Jacobs HS. 1998 Mortality of women with polycystic ovary syndrome at long-term follow-up. J Clin Epidemiol. 51:581–586.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Sorensen KE, Celermajer DS, Spiegelhalter DJ, et al. 1995 Non-invasive measurement of human endothelium dependent arterial responses: accuracy and reproducibility. Br Heart J. 74:247–253.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Celermajer DS, Sorensen KE, Bull C, Robinson J, Deanfield JE. 1994 Endothelium-dependent dilation in the systemic arteries of asymptomatic subjects relates to coronary risk factors, and their interaction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 24:1468–1474.[Abstract]
  13. Steinberg HO, Chaker H, Leaming R, Johnson A, Brechtel G, Baron AD.1996 Obesity/insulin resistance is associated with endothelial dysfunction. Implications for the syndrome of insulin resistance. J Clin Invest. 97:2601–2610.
  14. Sorensen KE, Celermajer DS, Georgakopoulos D, Hatcher G, Betteridge DJ, Deanfield JE. 1994 Impairment of endothelium-dependent dilation is an early event in children with familial hypercholesterolemia and is related to the lipoprotein(a) level. J Clin Invest. 93:50–55.
  15. Hashimoto M. 1995 Modulation of endothelium-dependent flow-mediated dilatation of the brachial artery by sex and menstrual cycle. Circulation. 92:3431–3435.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Anderson TJ, Uehata A, Gerhard MD, et al. 1995 Close relationship of endothelial function in the human coronary and peripheral circulations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 26:1235–1241.[Abstract]
  17. Writing Group for the PEPI Trial. 1995 Effects of estrogen or estrogen/progestin regimens on heart disease risk factors in postmenopausal women. The Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) Trial. JAMA. 273:199–208.[Abstract]
  18. Hulley S, Grady D, Bush T, et al. 1998 Randomized trial of estrogen plus progestin for secondary prvention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women. JAMA. 280:605–613.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Lieberman EH, Gerhard MD, Uehata A, et al. 1994 Estrogen improves endothelium-dependent, flow-mediated vasodilation in post-menopausal women. Ann Intern Med. 121:936–941.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Rubanyi GM, Romero C, Vanhoutte PM. 1986 Flow-induced release of endothelium-derived relaxing factor. Am J Physiol. 250:1115–1119.
  21. Pohl U, Holtz J, Busse R, Bassenge E. 1986 Crucial role of endothelium in the vasodilator response to increased flow in vivo. Hypertension. 8:37–44.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Nabel EG, Selwyn AP, Ganz P. 1990 Large coronary arteries in humans are responsive to changing blood flow: an endothelium-dependent mechanism that fails in patients with atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 16:349–356.[Abstract]
  23. Feldman RL, Pepine CJ, Conti CR. 1981 Magnitude of dilatation of large and small coronary arteries by nitroglycerin. Circulation. 64:324–333.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Celermajer DS, Sorensen KE, Gooch VM, et al. 1992 Non-invasive detection of endothelial dysfunction in children and adults at risk of atherosclerosis. Lancet. 340:1111–1115.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Legro RS, Finegood D, Dunaif A. 1998 A fasting glucose to insulin ratio is a useful measure of insulin sensitivity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 83:2694–2698.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Wilson PW, Kannel WB, Silbershatz H, D’Agostino RB. 1999 Clustering of metabolic factors and coronary heart disease. Arch Intern Med. 159:1104–1109.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Haffner SM, Valdez RA, Hazuda HP, Mitchell BD, Morales PA, Stern MP. 1992 Prospective analysis of the insulin-resistance syndrome (syndrome X). Diabetes. 41:715–722.[Abstract]
  28. Vogel RA. 1997 Coronary risk factors, endothelial function, and atherosclerosis: a review. Clin Cardiol. 20:426–432.[Medline]
  29. Prelevic GM, Beljic T, Balint-Peric L, Ginsburg J. 1995 Cardiac flow velocity in women with the polycystic ovary syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 43:677–681.[Medline]
  30. Paradisi G, Steinberg HO, Shepard M, Baron AD. 1998 Polycystic ovary syndrome is associated with endothelial dysfunction [Absract]. Diabetes. 47(Suppl 1):A309.
  31. McVeigh GE, Brennan GM, Johnston GD, et al. 1992 Impaired endothelium-dependent and independent vasodilation in patients with type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 35:771–776.[Medline]
  32. Petrie JR, Ueda S, Webb DJ, Elliott HL, Connell JM. 1996 Endothelial nitric oxide production and insulin sensitivity. A physiologic link with implications for pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 93:1331–1333.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Utriainen T, Makimattila S, Virkamaki A, Bergholm R, Yki-Jarvinen H. 1996 Dissociation between insulin sensitivity of glucose uptake and endothelial function in normal subjects. Diabetologia. 39:1477–1482.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Egan BM, Stepniakowski K. 1994 Compensatory hyperinsulinemia and the forearm vasodilator response during an oral glucose-tolerance test in obese hypertensives. J Hypertens. 12:1061–1067.[Medline]
  35. Serne EH, Coen DA, Stehouwer CD, et al. 1999 Microvascular function relates to insulin sensitivity and blood pressure in normal subjects. Circulation. 99:896–902.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Sung BH, Wilson MF, Izzo JL, Jr, Ramirez L, Dandona P. 1997 Moderately obese, insulin-resistant women exhibit abnormal vascular reactivity to stress. Hypertension. 30:848–853.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. O’Brien SF, Watts GF, Playford DA, Burke V, O’Neal DN, Best JD. 1997 Low-density lipoprotein size, high-density lipoprotein concentration, and endothelial dysfunction in non-insulin dependent diabetes. Diabetes Med. 14:974–978.[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Zeiher AM, Schachinger V, Hohnloser SH, Saurbier B, Just H. 1994 Coronary atherosclerotic wall thickening and vascular reactivity in humans: elevated high-density lipoprotein levels ameliorate abnormal vasoconstriction in early atherosclerosis. Circulation. 89:2525–2532.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
A Dagre, J Lekakis, C Mihas, A Protogerou, L Thalassinou, D Tryfonopoulos, G Douridas, C Papamichael, and M Alevizaki
Association of dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate with endothelial function in young women with polycystic ovary syndrome.
Eur. J. Endocrinol., June 1, 2006; 154(6): 883 - 890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Topcu, M. Caliskan, E. E. Ozcimen, D. Tok, A. Uckuyu, D. Erdogan, H. Gullu, A. Yildirir, H. Zeyneloglu, and H. Muderrisoglu
Do young women with polycystic ovary syndrome show early evidence of preclinical coronary artery disease?
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 930 - 935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Lakhani, W. Yang, A. Dooley, E. El-Mahdi, M. Sundaresan, S. McLellan, R. Bruckdorfer, A. Leonard, A. Seifalian, and P. Hardiman
Aortic function is compromised in a rat model of polycystic ovary syndrome
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2006; 21(3): 651 - 656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. Meyer, B. P. McGrath, and H. J. Teede
Overweight Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Have Evidence of Subclinical Cardiovascular Disease
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2005; 90(10): 5711 - 5716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Kravariti, K. K. Naka, S. N. Kalantaridou, N. Kazakos, C. S. Katsouras, A. Makrigiannakis, E. A. Paraskevaidis, G. P. Chrousos, A. Tsatsoulis, and L. K. Michalis
Predictors of Endothelial Dysfunction in Young Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2005; 90(9): 5088 - 5095.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
E Diamanti-Kandarakis, K Alexandraki, A Protogerou, C Piperi, C Papamichael, A Aessopos, J Lekakis, and M Mavrikakis
Metformin administration improves endothelial function in women with polycystic ovary syndrome
Eur. J. Endocrinol., May 1, 2005; 152(5): 749 - 756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. A. Ehrmann
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
N. Engl. J. Med., March 24, 2005; 352(12): 1223 - 1236.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
A S T Bickerton, N Clark, D Meeking, K M Shaw, M Crook, P Lumb, C Turner, and M H Cummings
Cardiovascular risk in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS)
J. Clin. Pathol., February 1, 2005; 58(2): 151 - 154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
I. Tarkun, B. C. Arslan, Z. Canturk, E. Turemen, T. Sahin, and C. Duman
Endothelial Dysfunction in Young Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Relationship with Insulin Resistance and Low-Grade Chronic Inflammation
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2004; 89(11): 5592 - 5596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
F. Orio Jr., S. Palomba, T. Cascella, B. De Simone, S. Di Biase, T. Russo, D. Labella, F. Zullo, G. Lombardi, and A. Colao
Early Impairment of Endothelial Structure and Function in Young Normal-Weight Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2004; 89(9): 4588 - 4593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
R. S. Legro
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Cardiovascular Disease: A Premature Association?
Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2003; 24(3): 302 - 312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
E. Diamanti-Kandarakis, J.-P. Baillargeon, M. J. Iuorno, D. J. Jakubowicz, and J. E. Nestler
A Modern Medical Quandary: Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Insulin Resistance, and Oral Contraceptive Pills
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2003; 88(5): 1927 - 1932.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. A. Stadtmauer, B. C. Wong, and S. Oehninger
Should patients with polycystic ovary syndrome be treated with metformin?: Benefits of insulin sensitizing drugs in polycystic ovary syndrome--beyond ovulation induction
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2002; 17(12): 3016 - 3026.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. J. G. Kelly, H. Lyall, J. R. Petrie, G. W. Gould, J. M. C. Connell, A. Rumley, G. D. O. Lowe, and N. Sattar
A Specific Elevation in Tissue Plasminogen Activator Antigen in Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2002; 87(7): 3287 - 3290.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. R. I. Williams, R. A. Westerman, B. A. Kingwell, J. Paige, P. A. Blombery, K. Sudhir, and P. A. Komesaroff
Variations in Endothelial Function and Arterial Compliance during the Menstrual Cycle
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2001; 86(11): 5389 - 5395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
E. Diamanti-Kandarakis, G. Spina, C. Kouli, and I. Migdalis
Increased Endothelin-1 Levels in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and the Beneficial Effect of Metformin Therapy
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2001; 86(10): 4666 - 4673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. C. J. Kelly, H. Lyall, J. R. Petrie, G. W. Gould, J. M. C. Connell, and N. Sattar
Low Grade Chronic Inflammation in Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2001; 86(6): 2453 - 2455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mather, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mather, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, T. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals