| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
From the Clinical Research Centers |
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Nutrition Sciences, Division of Physiology and Metabolism, and University of Alabama at Birmingham Obesity Research Center, Birmingham, Alabama 35294-3360
Address correspondence and requests for reprints to: B. A. Gower, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Nutrition Sciences, 441 Webb Building, 1675 University Boulevard, Birmingham, Alabama 35294-3360. E-mail: bgower{at}uab.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ovarian hormones may influence body composition through several potential mechanisms. It has been suggested that estradiol inhibits the action of adipose tissue lipoprotein lipase, the enzyme that hydrolyzes circulating triglycerides, allowing for the uptake of fatty acids into adipocytes (6). Furthermore, data from rodent models indicate that estrogen acts as an anorectic, decreasing voluntary food intake (7), and that estrogen increases physical activity-related energy expenditure (8) and may increase resting energy expenditure (REE) (9). Thus, both menopause and exogenous hormones could alter body composition via energy intake, energy expenditure, and biochemical mechanisms.
One means through which estrogen may affect energy balance is through influencing synthesis of the hormone leptin. Leptin is a hormone produced by adipocytes (10) that is thought to affect energy intake and expenditure (11, 12, 13). Leptin-deficient mice are obese and, when given exogenous leptin, lose body fat attributable to both an increase in REE and a decrease in food intake. Circumstantial evidence suggests that ovarian hormones affect leptin production. Leptin is reported to fluctuate with the menstrual cycle (14) [although results differ (15, 16)], and it increases with pubertal progression in girls (17). Additionally, in isolated adipocytes (18) and 3T3-L1 adipocytes (18), estradiol exposure increases leptin messenger RNA expression and leptin secretion, respectively, suggesting a direct effect of estradiol on adipose tissue.
Other factors that influence leptin production are circulating insulin and body fat distribution. Leptin production is positively associated with insulin concentration (19, 20, 21) and increases after insulin administration (20). In addition, adipose tissue seems heterogeneous, with respect to leptin production. Based on in vitro data (22, 23), visceral fat seems to produce less leptin than sc fat. Likewise, results of several in vivo studies have indicated that visceral fat is less well correlated with leptin than sc fat and, in multiple regression modeling, is not positively associated with leptin after adjusting for other indices of adiposity (24, 25, 26). Thus, at any given amount of total body fat, individuals with more visceral fat are likely to have less circulating leptin.
Studies designed to examine the influence of HRT on circulating leptin have been limited in number (27, 28, 29). Despite the provocative in vitro data, no in vivo study has uncovered a significant relationship between hormone use and circulating leptin. However, in most cases, data were adjusted for body mass index. Recent data indicate that simultaneous modeling of fat mass and lean body mass may be preferable to use of body mass index or percent fat (25, 30, 31). Additionally, potential variance caused by differences in insulin concentration or body fat distribution were not considered.
Therefore, the objectives of this study were, in a population of early postmenopausal women, to: 1) identify factors influencing serum leptin; 2) determine whether HRT influences serum leptin after adjusting for confounding factors; and, 3) identify potential independent effects of HRT or leptin on REE. This study is unique in examining the interrelationships between leptin and REE in a group of postmenopausal women using or not using hormone therapy, and in employing multiple regression modeling of both body composition (fat mass and lean mass) and fat distribution for serum leptin in a group of postmenopausal women.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subjects were 54 postmenopausal women, 4555 yr old (48 Caucasian and 6 African-American). Only women who experienced a natural menopause, with the time of menopause known to occur at least 6 months before contact, were recruited. Both women using HRT and women not using HRT were recruited. Among hormone users, only subjects using an oral estrogen/progestin combination were included (n = 35; predominantly conjugated equine estrogens, 0.625 mg/day; and medroxyprogesterone acetate, 2.5 mg/day). Only women using HRT for between 1 month and 6 yr were included in the study. In cases where usage was cyclic, testing was conducted during the combined (estrogen + progestin) portion of the cycle. The designation, No HRT use (n = 19), was defined as no current use and no use within the past 6 months. Eighteen nonusers had never used HRT. Only nonusers with FSH levels greater than 30 mIU/mL were included in the study. Data were collected over a 27-h period during an inpatient visit to the Department of Nutrition Sciences and the General Clinical Research Center (GCRC) at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board for Human Use at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, and all subjects signed an informed consent before testing.
Materials and methods
Protocol. Subjects arrived at the Department of Nutrition
Sciences at approximately 0900 h in the fasted condition (12-h
fast). Body composition was determined by dual-energy x-ray
absorptiometry (DXA). At approximately 1200 h, subjects were
escorted to the University of Alabama at Birminghams GCRC. Subjects
remained at the GCRC for approximately 24 h, departing at noon the
following day. At approximately 1900 h, subjects were escorted to
Radiology for computed tomography scanning. While at the GCRC, all food
was provided. The evening snack was consumed before 1900 h.
Subjects then remained fasted until indirect calorimetry (
0500 h)
and fasting blood draw (
0700 h) the following morning.
Body composition and fat distribution. Total and regional body composition (fat mass and lean body mass) were measured by DXA using a DPX-L densitometer (Lunar Corp., Madison, WI). Subjects were scanned in light clothing while lying flat on their backs with arms at their sides. DXA scans were performed and analyzed with adult software version 1.5g. Visceral (intraabdominal) and sc abdominal fat were analyzed by computed tomography scanning with a HiLight/Advantage Scanner (General Electric, Milwaukee, WI), as previously described (32). A scout scan was first performed to locate the L4-L5 intervertebral space. Subsequently, a 5-mm scan of this abdominal site was taken. Scans were later analyzed for cross-sectional area (cm2) of adipose tissue using the density contour program with Hounsfield units for adipose tissue set at -190 to -30. We have shown the test-retest reliability for visceral fat to be 1.7 percent (33). All scans were analyzed by the same investigator (T. R. Nagy). Scans were not available on four of the subjects (two HRT-users and two nonusers).
REE. REE was determined upon awakening, after an overnight fast, by indirect calorimetry (Deltatrac, Sensormedics, Yorba Linda, CA) in the GCRC. The instrument was calibrated before each test, against standard gases. During testing, all subjects were instructed to lie as still as possible. A canopy hood was used to collect expired air for 20 min after a 10-min equilibration period, and oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production were measured continuously during this time. Energy expenditure was calculated using the equation of de Weir (34).
Assay of glucose, insulin, leptin, and estrogens. Serum was obtained after an overnight fast. Glucose was measured in 10 µL sera using an Ektachem DT II System (Johnson & Johnson Clinical Diagnostics). In our laboratory, this analysis has a mean intraassay coefficient of variation (c.v.) of 0.61% and a mean interassay c.v. of 1.45%. Insulin was assayed in duplicate 200-µL aliquots with Coat-A-Count kits (Diagnostic Products Corporation, Los Angeles, CA). According to the supplier, cross-reactivity of this assay with proinsulin is approximately 40% at midcurve; C-peptide is not detected. In our laboratory, this assay has a sensitivity of 1.9 µIU/mL , a mean intraassay c.v. of 5%, and a mean interassay c.v. of 6%. Commercial quality control sera of low, medium, and high insulin concentration (Lyphochek, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Anaheim, CA) are included in every assay, to monitor variation over time. Serum leptin was measured in duplicate 100-µL aliquots using a double-antibody RIA (Linco Research, Inc., St. Charles, MO). In our laboratory, this assay has a sensitivity of 0.4 ng/mL , a mean intraassay c.v. of 5%, and a mean interassay c.v. of 6%. Serum estradiol was measured using a double-antibody RIA (Diagnostic Products). Sera were first extracted in diethyl ether. Assay sensitivity was determined to be 4.2 pg/mL, intraassay c.v. to be 5.3%, and interassay c.v. to be 6.0%. Serum estrone sulfate was measured in duplicate 100-µL aliquots using a double-antibody RIA (Diagnostic Systems Laboratories, Inc., Webster, TX). Assay sensitivity was determined to be 0.47 ng/mL, intraassay c.v. to be 6.2%, and interassay c.v. to be 8.0%.
Statistics. For all analyses, values for body composition variables and serum analytes were log-transformed to produce a normal distribution. Pearson correlation analysis was used to examine associations between fat distribution variables and serum leptin. Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was used to identify variables that best predicted serum leptin. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to identify independent effects of visceral fat, sc abdominal fat, and leg fat on serum leptin. Leg fat was selected to serve as an index of peripheral sc fat, which is metabolically unique from abdominal sc fat and visceral fat (35). Partial correlation analysis was used to examine the association between circulating estrogen concentrations and serum leptin, after adjusting for variables that were significant predictors of serum leptin (total fat, fasting insulin, and total lean mass). Multiple linear regression was used to determine whether HRT or leptin were independently related to REE after adjusting for fat mass, total lean mass, and ethnicity (36). Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to determine the mean values for leptin and REE for nonusers and users of HRT after adjusting for covariates (fat mass, lean mass, and insulin for serum leptin; fat mass, fat-free mass, and ethnicity for REE). All data were analyzed with SAS for Windows version 6.12 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Results indicated that, in this group of postmenopausal women, leptin could best be predicted from total fat mass, fasting serum insulin, and total lean mass. Whereas fat mass and insulin were positively related to leptin, lean mass was inversely related. This observation indicates that it was the relative proportion of fat mass to lean mass, as well as the absolute amount of body fat, that influenced circulating leptin concentration. Similar observations regarding the negative association between lean mass and leptin have been observed in children (25) and adolescents (30, 31).
Results from a number of studies have suggested that leptin production is not uniform across different adipose tissue depots. In general, sc adipose tissue seems to produce more leptin that visceral adipose tissue. Among prepubertal children (genders combined), visceral fat is not independently related to leptin after adjusting for other body composition/fat distribution indices, gender, and ethnicity (25). Likewise, in a group of children and adolescents (genders combined), the association between visceral fat and leptin was not significant after adjusting for sc fat (24). A study with Asian Indian men (mean age, 38.6 ± 10 yr) indicated a significant correlation between leptin and sc abdominal fat (0.89, P < 0.001) but not between leptin and visceral fat (r = 0.37, P > 0.05) (26). These observations agree with in vitro data suggesting that visceral fat produces less leptin than sc fat (23).
In the present study, simple correlation analysis indicated that leptin was correlated with all individual body fat regions examined (r = 0.640.67). However, multiple linear regression analysis indicated that, of these three regions, only leg fat and visceral fat were independently associated with serum leptin (sc abdominal fat was not independently related to leptin). The independent association of leptin with visceral fat is both a unique finding and a finding at odds with the studies cited above. However, all of the cited studies were conducted in relatively young subjects. If the subjects of the present study are representative of postmenopausal women in general, then the present results may suggest that leptin production by sc abdominal fat decreases, or production by visceral fat increases, after menopause. Some support for this hypothesis comes from a study of elderly subjects in whom the association between visceral fat and leptin was strong in both men (R2 = 0.57) and women (R2 = 0.38) (21). Taken together, data suggest that the relative contribution of visceral fat to circulating leptin concentration may increase with age.
The positive association between leptin and fasting insulin observed in this group of healthy postmenopausal women is consistent with observations in other populations (19, 20, 21). One limitation of the current study is the use of a single, fasting blood draw for measurements of insulin and leptin; in the fasted state, the influence of insulin on leptin may be less apparent. Nonetheless, because of the significant independent relationship between insulin and leptin, we chose to use insulin as a covariate when examining the influence on HRT on serum leptin.
Hormone use status did not influence serum leptin after adjusting for
fat mass, fasting insulin concentration, and lean mass (Fig. 2
). This
observation agrees with other data showing no relationship between
hormone use and circulating leptin (21, 27, 28, 29). Thus, if menopause is
associated with a decrease in circulating leptin [as suggested by some
(14), but not all (28, 29), studies], this decrease does not seem to
be reversed by treatment with exogenous hormones. However, an
intervention study is needed to definitively determine whether HRT
affects leptin production.
In contrast, analysis of serum estrogen concentrations indicated a
relationship between circulating estradiol and serum leptin. Among
subjects not using hormones, serum estradiol was inversely associated
with serum leptin, after adjusting for fat mass, lean body mass, and
insulin (Table 5
, Fig. 1
). The same was not true with hormone users,
among whom neither the circulating concentration of the native, active
estrogen, estradiol, nor that of the estrogen metabolite, estrone
sulfate, was significantly correlated with serum leptin. Estrone
sulfate is a major constituent of oral conjugated equine estrogens
(
45%) and is the major circulating estrogen in humans. It can be
converted to more active estrogens, such as estradiol. Previous studies
have either failed to observe a relationship between circulating
estrogen concentrations and serum leptin (15, 16) or have observed a
positive correlation between estradiol and leptin (37), and estrone and
leptin (21). However, in the latter case, adjustment for body fat
eliminated the relationship. Differences between the present study and
previous studies may be attributable to differences in aspects of the
subject population (age, menopausal status) or to the method of
statistical adjustment. In the present study, leptin was adjusted for
the major confounding variables (total body fat, lean body mass, and
insulin). This method of adjustment may have allowed for the
relationship between estradiol and leptin to be observed. The observed
inverse relationship between estradiol and leptin in nonusers implies
that, as ovarian hormone production declines, leptin production
increases. However, this observation awaits confirmation.
The third objective of the study was to determine whether HRT or
leptin were independently associated with REE. Estrogen is thought to
increase REE in animal models (38, 39, 40), although most evidence is
circumstantial. Few studies have used indirect calorimetry to measure
REE in estrogen-treated animals, and conclusions differ; results of two
studies indicate a stimulatory effect of estradiol on REE (9, 40),
whereas results of another indicate no effect (39). Although REE in
women declines over the menopause transition, this decline is
associated with a loss of lean body mass (1), leaving it unclear as to
whether mass-specific REE is altered by menopause (and the associated
decline in estrogen). In the present study, REE did not differ with
hormone use after adjusting for body composition and ethnicity (Fig. 2
). However, all subjects on HRT used a combined estrogen-progestin
regimen and were tested during the progestin phase. Progesterone can
block or antagonize metabolic effects of estrogen (38). Thus, whether
treatment with unopposed estrogen, or testing of subjects during the
estrogen-only phase, would yield different results regarding the
influence of HRT on REE remains to be determined.
Leptin did not explain any additional variance in REE. This result is
in agreement with findings from most (41, 42, 43, 44, 45), but not all (46, 47, 48),
other clinical studies examining relationships between circulating
leptin and REE. In cases where a positive association was observed
between leptin and REE (46, 48), fat mass was not included in the
regression model. In the present study, both fat mass and fat-free mass
were included in the regression model. If the present data were
analyzed as in References 46 and 48 (i.e. without fat mass
as an independent variable), then leptin would be significantly and
positively associated with REE (data not shown). Because the
correlation coefficient between fat mass and leptin was 0.79 in the
present study, the two variables cannot be considered colinear
[r
0.95 (49)], and it was appropriate to put both
in the model for REE. Thus, our data would suggest that if leptin
influences REE in humans, the effect is likely small in magnitude and
difficult to detect in cross-sectional observations.
In conclusion, fat mass, fasting insulin concentration, and lean body mass, but not HRT, were significant determinants of serum leptin in this group of postmenopausal women. Visceral fat was associated with leptin independent of sc fat (both leg fat and abdominal fat), suggesting that the contribution of visceral fat to leptin may increase with age or transition through the menopause. Serum estradiol was inversely correlated with (adjusted) leptin in non-HRT users, suggesting that ovarian senescence may lead to an increase in leptin. Neither HRT nor leptin was independently related to REE. Further research is needed to clarify the role of circulating leptin in determining energy balance in postmenopausal women.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Present address: Institute for Prevention Research, Department of
Preventive Medicine, 1540 Alcazar Street, Room 208-D, University of
Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90033. ![]()
Received September 2, 1999.
Revised January 6, 2000.
Accepted January 12, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-helical-CRF(941) prevents the anorectic effect of
17-ß-estradiol. Brain Res Bull. 32:689692.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Munoz and B. A. Gower Relationship between Serum Leptin Concentration and Low-Density Muscle in Postmenopausal Women J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2003; 88(3): 1157 - 1161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Hu, S. C. Juneja, N. J. Maihle, and M. P. Cleary Leptin--A Growth Factor in Normal and Malignant Breast Cells and for Normal Mammary Gland Development J Natl Cancer Inst, November 20, 2002; 94(22): 1704 - 1711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |