| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Original Studies |
Medical Research Council Reproductive Biology Unit (H.M.F., S.F.L., W.C.D., F.E.R., P.J.I.), Center for Reproductive Biology, Edinburgh EH3 9ET, United Kingdom; and Department of Reproductive Medicine (H.K., G.F.E.), University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0674
Address correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. H. M. Fraser, Medical Research Council Reproductive Biology Unit, Centre for Reproductive Biology, 37 Chalmers Street, Edinburgh EH3 9ET, United Kingdom. E-mail: h.fraser{at}ed-rbu.mrc.ac.uk
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There is increasing evidence that insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) and their binding proteins (IGFBPs) may be important effectors of luteal function (7, 8, 9). Previous findings suggest that IGFBP-3 may be one such factor of physiological importance in the vascular system of the CL. In the rat ovary, IGFBP-3 is localized predominantly to the vascular endothelial cells but only in regressing CL (10). This suggested that the induction of IGFBP-3 gene activity in the endothelium might be involved in luteolysis in this species. Further, in support of its role as an intrinsic luteal regulator, IGFBP-3 gene expression has also been shown to be induced in the endothelial cells of the marmoset CL; however, in contrast to the rat, IGFBP-3 was expressed throughout the luteal phase and declined during luteolysis (11). Collectively, these observations, demonstrating the tissue-specific expression of IGFBP-3 in the endothelium of the CL, support the hypothesis that differential regulation of IGFBP-3 expression might mediate important luteolytic and luteotrophic changes in the vascular system of the rat and primate, respectively.
IGFBP-3 messenger RNA (mRNA) has been shown to be localized to endothelial cells in the human ovary, but temporal changes in its expression were not determined because only four corpus lutea (CL) were examined (7). To begin to address the clinical relevance of IGFBP-3 in the CL, we investigated the pattern of expression of IGFBP-3 mRNA in human corpora lutea during luteinization, luteolysis, and rescue by hCG.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Corpora lutea were enucleated at the time of hysterectomy, as described previously (1, 12, 13). All women were healthy, 3245 yr old, with regular menstrual cycles, and had not received any form of hormonal treatment for at least 3 months before taking part in the study. The date of the preovulatory luteinizing hormone (LH) surge was determined by measuring LH concentrations in serial early-morning urine samples collected before operation (13). On this basis, three CL were classified as early luteal (LH+2 to LH+4 days), five as midluteal (LH+6 to LH+9 days), and four as late luteal (LH+11 to LH+19 days). In addition, five women were given im injections of hCG (Profasi, Serono Laboratories, Inc., Welwyn Garden City, UK) from LH+7, in daily doubling doses, starting at 125 IU and continuing for 68 days until surgery (13). This regimen has been shown to rescue the CL and reproduce the hormonal changes of early pregnancy (14). Corpora lutea were enucleated from the ovary by blunt dissection, the tissue immediately divided into radial blocks, and a portion fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 h. These corpora lutea were further used in studies to determine changes in other factors associated with control of luteal cell function described elsewhere (1, 12, 13).
An endometrial biopsy was also obtained to assist luteal staging by tissue morphometry. In all cases, morphological dating of the luteal-phase endometrium (15) was used to confirm the luteal-phase classification. Plasma was taken before surgery, and progesterone concentrations were measured using a standard RIA (13). The study was approved by the Reproductive Medicine Branch of the South-East of Scotland Medical Ethics Committee, and informed consent was obtained from all patients before tissue collection.
In situ hybridization
In situ hybridization was performed using a complementary RNA probe for human IGFBP-3, as described previously (11). Paraffin sections (5 µm) were mounted onto poly-L-lysine-coated glass slides, secured in racks, and transported in boxes to San Diego for mRNA localization by in situ hybridization. Sections were deparaffinized in xylene and hydrated through descending concentrations of ethyl alcohol. Sections were digested in 0.32% proteinase K (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN) for 20 min at 37 C, acetylated, and dehydrated. Sense and antisense probes were prepared using an RNA transcription kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and labeled with 35S uridine 5'-triphosphate (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Arlington Heights, IL). The synthesized probes were purified from free bases by using Quick Spin columns (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). Hybridization was performed with the probes at 107 cpm/mL hybridization solution containing 50% (vol/vol) formamide, 0.3 mol/L NaCl, 10 mmol/L Tris, 1 mmol/L EDTA, 0.05% yeast transfer RNA, 10 mmol/L dithiothreitol, 1 x Denhardts solution, and 10% Dextran sulphate. Two sections per slide on two slides were exposed to the antisense probe, and two sections on a single slide were exposed to the sense sequence. Each slide was hybridized with 80 µL hybridization solution on a 60-C slide warmer overnight. Slides were rinsed in SSC and then treated with ribonuclease A (20 µg/mL) for 30 min at 37 C to remove all excess probe, desalted in descending concentrations of SSC, washed in 0.1 x SSC at 75 C, and dehydrated. Dry slides were exposed to Hyperfilm-Max (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) for 4 days, then dipped in NTB-2 liquid emulsion (Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY), and exposed for 24 days, at 4 C, in light-tight slide boxes. Slides were developed with D-19 developer (Eastman Kodak Co.) for 3.5 min at 4 C and subsequently fixed. The sense and one antisense slide were counterstained with hematoxylin, whereas the remaining antisense slide was stained with hematoxylin and eosin (Richard-Allan, Richland, MI).
Analysis
The slides were analyzed under both light- and darkfield conditions, assessment being made of the degree and frequency of expression in endothelial cells according to blood vessel size. Vessels with one to three visible endothelial cells were considered capillaries, whereas those in which a lumen was visible, often containing erythrocytes and surrounded by more than four endothelial cells, were classed as microvessels (and included venules and arterioles). The intensity of the hybridization signal was scored as follows: -, no expression above tissue background; +, low expression; ++, moderate expression; +++, high expression. Two further observers scored the sections blind. Comparison of the results between the three observers showed excellent agreement. Differences between groups, with respect to level of mRNA expression, were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test, significance being ascribed at a level of P < 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The classification of corpora lutea by serial urinary LH measurement agreed with the luteal phase dating of endometrial biopsies. The plasma progesterone concentrations were 22 ± 12 (mean ± SEM) nmol/L in the early luteal samples, 41.0 ± 9.9 nmol/L in the midluteal samples, and 19.2 ± 12.9 nmol/L in the late luteal samples. After luteal rescue by exogenous hCG, plasma progesterone concentrations increased to 52.6 ± 1.5 nmol/L.
Expression of IGFBP-3 mRNA
Figure 1
is of a low
magnification and depicts the distribution of IGFBP-3 mRNA in a typical
early human CL with adjacent stromal tissue. The IGFBP-3 mRNA is found
predominantly in the vascular system, being strongly expressed in the
peripheral stromal microvessels and the straight capillaries of the CL
proper. Heterogeneity in labeling is evident, both in the CL and
stroma, with some blood vessels appearing negative for IGFBP-3. Higher
magnification of another early-luteal-phase CL (Fig. 2
) shows that the expression is occurring
in the endothelial cells lining the microvessels and capillaries. Once
again, heterogeneity is evident. In this example, the distribution of
labeling suggests radiation of the capillaries from the microvessel
from which they have originated. IGFBP-3 mRNA was not detected in the
other cell types within the CL (Fig. 2
). Absence of expression in the
granulosa and theca lutein cells is also evident in the midluteal
section shown in Fig. 3
. This specimen
illustrates how expression is high in some vessels at this stage,
whereas in other luteal microvessels, expression is virtually
absent.
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The high level of expression in the early luteal phase suggests a positive role for IGFBP-3 during the formation of the CL, when endothelial cell replication is at its highest (1). This agrees with our previous report in the marmoset (11) and suggests IGFBP-3 may regulate angiogenesis and luteal function rather than endothelial cell death and luteolysis, as is apparently the case in the rat (10). The lower expression during the mid- and late luteal phases may be indicative of an attenuation of this role, as endothelial cell proliferation is declining. That a decline in IGFBP-3 expression is associated with naturally occurring luteolysis is supported by the observations in the CL of the marmoset, in which the IGFBP-3 mRNA was either absent or confined to the microvessels of the CL during the late luteal phase (11). These changes are the result of differences in IGFBP-3 expression between endothelial cells and not a reflection of reduction in numbers of endothelial cells; we have shown previously that numbers of endothelial cells in the early luteal phase were significantly lower than in the mid- and late luteal phases by studying the majority of corpora lutea used in the present study (1).
It was of particular interest that IGFBP-3 expression was elevated in corpora lutea from women who had been treated with hCG from the midluteal phase to mimic the rescue of the CL during early pregnancy. In the hCG-treated CL, endothelial cell proliferation shows no increase (1, 4), and endothelial cell numbers are similar to those in the mid- and late luteal phases (1); however, the function of both the hormone-producing cells and endothelial cells is maintained during this period, at a time when they would normally undergo apoptosis in the absence of pregnancy (17, 18, 19). It is tempting to propose that IGFBP-3 is involved as a component of a survival mechanism for the endothelial cells at this time.
Defining the precise role of IGFBP-3 in luteal endothelial cells is likely to be difficult, because it is clear from studies in other systems that IGF/IGFBP interactions can be very complex. IGF acts in a wide variety of organs and tissues to stimulate cell proliferation and amplifies the effects of the tropic hormones on the gonads (20, 21). In most situations, the action of IGFBP-3 is inhibitory, because, when bound to IGFBP-3, IGF is unable to interact with its receptor. Indeed, most of the information described previously for IGF/IGFBP-3 interactions in the ovary have indicated an inhibitory function, e.g. IGFBP-3 has been shown to inhibit the progesterone response to IGF in human granulosa cells (22). However, depending on the tissue site and on the experimental paradigm, IGFBP-3 has been reported to both facilitate or inhibit IGF action in different cells (20). Previous studies on the ovary have focused on the paracrine function of IGFBP-3, and it is possible that an autocrine role within the luteal endothelial cells may be quite different. An apparently divergent role for the same molecule in controlling angiogenesis and blood vessel stability is not without precedent. Within the angiopoietin family, for example, angiopoietin-2 has a positive role in angiogenesis in the presence of vascular endothelial growth factor; but when vascular endothelial growth factor is absent or reduced, angiopoietin-2 acts to destabilize endothelial cells (23, 24). It may also be of relevance that, in some tissues, endothelial cell IGFBP-3 has been implicated in the transport of IGFs from the bloodstream to the subendothelial cells (25), suggesting a positive role in tissue metabolism. IGF-1 receptors have been identified in the human CL (8, 26), although their precise location has yet to be established. Because IGF-1 may function to increase progesterone production, such a positive role of IGFBP-3 might serve to contribute to the increased progesterone production during early pregnancy.
Although IGFBP-3 mRNA expression was observed in the endothelial cells in the majority of microvessels and capillaries, the reason for the absence of expression in others is unclear. No morphological explanation for the failure of some cells to show hybridization was apparent. Although the reasons for the heterogeneity in expression remain to be established and will require further investigation, they may relate to differential maturity of individual endothelial cells. It is also known that endothelial cells throughout the vasculature do not constitute a homogeneous population of cells (27), and differences in function may occur within, as well as between, vascular beds. Additionally, further studies are required to determine whether expression of the IGFBP-3 mRNA is continuously associated with its translation into a functional protein or whether there are translational restrictions.
In conclusion, our data are consistent with the hypothesis that IGFBP-3 may play an autocrine/paracrine role in CL regulation in the primate ovary. The identification of the IGFBP-3 mRNA in the endothelial cells suggests a specific role of the protein product in the microvasculature of the CL. Further studies will be required to address the mechanisms controlling the cyclical regulation of IGFBP-3 expression within the human CL and to address its specific role in the development and demise of this important endocrine tissue during the menstrual cycle and pregnancy. Because maintenance of luteal function is essential for continuation of pregnancy, and inhibition of angiogenesis has been shown to have an antifertility effect in the rodent (28) and nonhuman primate (29), the possibility that IGFBP-3 may have a role in regulation of the endothelial cells should add impetus to such studies, with the further potential for development of agents that stimulate or inhibit angiogenesis in the CL.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received July 22, 1999.
Revised December 3, 1999.
Accepted December 15, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Lofqvist, J. Chen, K. M. Connor, A. C. H. Smith, C. M. Aderman, N. Liu, J. E. Pintar, T. Ludwig, A. Hellstrom, and L. E. H. Smith From the Cover: IGFBP3 suppresses retinopathy through suppression of oxygen-induced vessel loss and promotion of vascular regrowth PNAS, June 19, 2007; 104(25): 10589 - 10594. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Franklin, R. J. Ferry Jr., and P. Cohen Rapid Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF)-Independent Effects of IGF Binding Protein-3 on Endothelial Cell Survival J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2003; 88(2): 900 - 907. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Arraztoa, P. Monget, C. Bondy, and J. Zhou Expression Patterns of Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Binding Proteins 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 in the Mid-Cycle Monkey Ovary J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2002; 87(11): 5220 - 5228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Lal, H. Peters, B. St. Croix, Z. A. Haroon, M. W. Dewhirst, R. L. Strausberg, J. H. A. M. Kaanders, A. J. van der Kogel, and G. J. Riggins Transcriptional Response to Hypoxia in Human Tumors J Natl Cancer Inst, September 5, 2001; 93(17): 1337 - 1343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Wulff, H. Wilson, P. Largue, W. C. Duncan, D. G. Armstrong, and H. M. Fraser Angiogenesis in the Human Corpus Luteum: Localization and Changes in Angiopoietins, Tie-2, and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Messenger Ribonucleic Acid J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2000; 85(11): 4302 - 4309. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |