help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sawai, Y.
Right arrow Articles by DeGroot, L. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sawai, Y.
Right arrow Articles by DeGroot, L. J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
*Genetics Home Reference
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 85, No. 3 1176-1179
Copyright © 2000 by The Endocrine Society


Original Studies

Binding of Human Thyrotropin Receptor Peptides to a Graves’ Disease-Predisposing Human Leukocyte Antigen Class II Molecule

Yoshikuni Sawai and Leslie J. DeGroot

Thyroid Study Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Leslie J. DeGroot, Thyroid Study Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Abstract

There are many reports that Graves’ disease (GD) is associated with certain human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules, in particular DR3. Here we examined the characteristics of binding of human TSH receptor (TSHR) peptides to this disease-associated HLA class II molecule. DR3 molecules bind TSHR immuonodominant peptide epitopes with intermediate affinity. On the contrary, DR3 binds nonimmunogenic peptides either with poor affinity or not at all, with one exceptional peptide that has extremely high affinity. These results suggest that susceptibility to GD associated with inheritance of a specific HLA class II gene is due to the influence of the HLA molecule-TSHR peptide complex on the T cell repertoire.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
GRAVES’ DISEASE (GD) is an autoimmune disease in which autoantibodies against the TSH receptor (TSHR) stimulate the thyroid gland; consequently, hyperthyroidism occurs. As production of the TSHR autoantibodies by B cells is regulated by T cells, it is important to clarify how T cells are activated by antigen presentation. In other words, what controls the T cell receptor (TCR)-human leukocyte antigen (HLA)/peptide complex interaction? HLA genes are one of the most important genetic risk factors for susceptibility to autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, and multiple sclerosis as well as autoimmune thyroid diseases. In GD, the predisposing effects of HLA-B8 and HLA-DR3 have been reported in Caucasian populations (1, 2). More recently, we and others reported that the HLA-DQA1*0501 allele is positively associated with GD (3, 4). It seems reasonable that autoimmune disease-predisposing HLA molecules might be associated with GD because of the special role they play in presenting specific autoantigenic peptides to T cells.

We previously investigated T cell responses to a battery of synthetic peptides spanning the human TSHR extracellular domain. The results in patients with GD suggested that peptides containing amino acid residues 158–176, 207–222, 237–252/248–263, and 343–362/357–376 of TSHR are important or possibly immunodominant T cell epitopes (5, 6). These sequences most commonly stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells or T cell lines and T cell clones of patients with GD and had the least stimulatory effect on peripheral blood mononuclear cells or T cell lines from normal subjects.

In this study we use the TSHR peptides to examine their binding characteristics to a GD-predisposing HLA class II molecule. The immunogenic peptides bind to the HLA molecule, whereas nonimmunogenic peptides do not, with one exceptional peptide that has extremely high affinity.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Monoclonal antibodies and cell lines

Monclonal antibody L243 (anti-DR) was purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). An Epstein-Barr virus-transformed B lymphocyte cell line, QBL, homozygous for DR3 (DRB1*0301) was a gift from Dr. Gerald T. Nepom (Virginia Mason Research Center, Seattle, WA). QBL cells were cultured in RPMI 1640, which was supplemented with 2 mmol/L L-glutamine, 100 U/100 µg/mL penicillin/streptomycin, and 10% heat-inactivated FCS (Life Technologies, Inc., Grand Island, NY).

Purification of DR

A total of 108 cells were harvested and washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Cells were lysed in 20 mL of 10 mmol/L PBS (pH 8.0), 0.1% Triton X-100, 1 mmol/L phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride, and 1 mmol/L ethylenediamine tetraacetate. The lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 100,000 x g for 60 min at 4 C. Lysates were then passed through a protein A column followed by passage through an L243 affinity column. The L243 affinity column was washed extensively with 10 mmol/L PBS (pH 8.0) and 0.1% Triton X-100. The DR molecules were then eluted with 50 mmol/L glycine-NaOH (pH 11.5), and 0.1% Triton X-100, and the eluates were neutralized with 2 mol/L glycine-HCl (pH 2.0) and then dialyzed in 10 mmol/L PBS (pH 7.4) and 0.1% Triton X-100.

DR molecules purified from QBL consist of DR3 (DRB1*0301) and DR52b (DRB3*0202). DR52b was not removed, but a DR3-specific indicator peptide [which binds to DR3 and not DR52b, Mycobacterium tuberculosis 65-kDa heat shock protein 3–13 (hsp-(3–13); see Peptide synthesis] (7, 8) allowed us to examine DR3-specific binding.

Peptide synthesis

Peptides corresponding to the sequence of TSHR extracellular domain were synthesized by a solid phase peptide synthesis method (9). The peptides overlapped each other by five or six residues to minimize the risk of missing epitopes split between peptides. N-Terminal biotinylated Mycobacterium tuberculosis 65-kDa hsp-(3–13) (KTIAYDEEARR) was used as a DR3-specific indicator peptide. This peptide is known to bind to HLA DR3 specifically and with high affinity. In the system defined below, using nonlabeled hsp-(3–13) to compete with labeled hsp-(3–13), we found its IC50 to be between 100–500 nmol/L.

Peptide binding assays

Ten microliters of N-terminal biotinylated indicator peptide in PBS [hsp-(3–13) at final concentration of 100 nmol/L] were dispensed into 96-well polypropylene plates (binding plates). Ten microliters of serially diluted TSHR peptides in PBS-1.5% dimethylsulfoxide were added to each well of the binding plates. Thirty microliters of affinity-purified HLA class II molecules (100 ng protein) in a 5-µl volume and 25 µL binding buffer [50/100 mmol/L citrate-phosphate (pH 4.5), 0.15 mol/L NaCl, 0.2% Triton X-100, 2 mmol/L phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride, 2 mmol/L ethylenediamine tetraacetate, 0.15 µmol/L aprotinin, 2 µmol/L leupeptin, and 1.5 µmol/L pepstatin A] were added to each well of the binding plates and incubated for 21 h at 37 C.

The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) plates were prepared as follows. Fifty microliters per well of 10 µg/mL anti-DR L243 (American Type Culture Collection HB 55) monoclonal antibodies were used to coat 96-well polystyrene plates overnight at 4 C. The wells were washed 3 times with DW, blocked with 200 µL blocking buffer (PBS, 1% BSA fraction, and 0.1% Tween-20) for 30 min at 37 C, and washed 3 times with DW. Twenty-five to 450 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 3% BSA, 0.1% Triton X-100, and 0.3% Tween-20 were dispensed to each well of the ELISA plates. Subsequently, 50 µL of the mixture from each well of the binding plates was transferred to the corresponding wells of the ELISA plates and incubated for 7 h at room temperature. After washing wells 3 times with PBS-0.05% Tween-20 and 3 times with DW, 50 µL 2 µg/mL streptavidin-alkaline-phosphatase (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL) in PBS, 1% BSA fraction, and 0.1% Tween-20 were added to each well and incubated for 60 min at room temperature. The plates were then washed 5 times with PBS-0.05% Tween-20 and 5 times with DW. Then, 200 µL/well of 1 mg/mL p-nitrophenyl phosphate (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) were added and incubated for 12 h at room temperature. The amount of substrate hydrolyzed was assessed with a spectrophotometer at 405 nm.

The binding of indicator peptides without DR molecules was measured as nonspecific binding, and it was always the same as background.

The percent inhibition was calculated as follows: % inhibition = [100 - (sample binding - background binding) x 100]/(maximum binding - background binding).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Binding of TSHR peptides to GD-predisposing DR3 molecule

We previously identified immunodominant T cell epitopes in human TSHR extracellular domain in GD [TSHR-(158–176), -(207–222), -(237–252/248–263), and –(343–362/357–376)]. These peptides caused significantly greater stimulation of T cells from patients with GD than of cells from normal control subjects (5, 6).

In this study the immunogenic peptides exhibited intermediate affinity for a GD-predisposing DR3 molecules, with the exception of TSHR-(248–263), which exhibited high affinity. Most peptides had an IC50 of 10–50 µmol/L. TSHR-(248–263) had a higher IC50 of 1–5 µmol/L (Fig. 1AGo).



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Binding of TSHR peptides to GD-predisposing DR3 molecules. Binding of biotinylated DR3-specific indicator peptide hsp-(3–13) was competed by various doses of immunodominant TSHR peptides (A) or nonimmunogenic TSHR peptides (B). The percent inhibition was calculated as described in Materials and Methods. Data shown are representative of two separate experiments, with each data point repeated in triplicate. Percent inhibitions by immunodominant TSHR peptides are significantly higher than those by nonimmunogenic TSHR peptides at 50 µmol/L (P < 0.05). The statistical difference is much greater when TSHR-(109–124), which showed exceptionally high affinity to DR3, is excluded (P < 0.001).

 
On the contrary, most of the nonimmunogenic TSHR peptides tested were poor binders to DR3. TSHR-(109–124) was exceptional and exhibited extremely high affinity (Fig. 1BGo). TSHR-(183–198) seemed to be a nonbinder to DR3. However to determine whether TSHR-(183–198) is a nonbinder or a very poor binder, a higher concentration of TSHR-(183–198) needs to be tested for inhibition.

The percent inhibitions by immunodominant TSHR peptides are significantly higher than those by nonimmunogenic TSHR peptides at 50 µmol/L (P < 0.05). Among nonimmunogenic TSHR peptides, TSHR-(109–124) is exceptional and appears to have a different way of affecting susceptibility to GD, as discussed below. Statistical difference is much greater when TSHR-(109–124) is excluded (P < 0.001).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
HLA molecules bind and present peptide fragments of protein antigens to T cells. Therefore, HLA molecules play a pivotal role in the development of autoimmune diseases through presentation of specific autoantigenic peptides to autoreactive T cells. Whether this role is in initial negative selection, in immune reactivity, or otherwise is unknown.

We found that a GD-predisposing DR3 molecule binds multiple immunoreactive TSHR peptides with intermediate affinity, whereas DR3 binds nonimmunogenic TSHR peptides with low affinity or does not bind the peptides at all (one exceptional peptide showed extremely high affinity; Fig. 1Go and Table 1Go). Our result is consistent with several studies indicating that most autoantigenic peptides show intermediate or low binding affinity to the disease-predisposing major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecules (10, 11, 12). These findings suggest that the relatively low affinity of autoantigenic peptides for MHC molecules may allow autoreactive T cells to escape from thymic deletion.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Comparison of affinity of binding of TSHR peptides to GD-predisposing DR3 molecules

 
A differential avidity model for T cell selection in the thymus has been proposed. In this model, avidity is determined by interaction of 1) TCR affinity for peptide/MHC, 2) density of TCR, and 3) density of peptide/MHC complexes, and is the signal for selection; low avidity results in positive selection, and high avidity results in negative selection (13). Liu et al. supported the model by constructing transgenic mice expressing an encephalitogenic TCR. Administration of the native immunodominant epitope of myelin basic protein did not affect developing thymocytes in the mice. In contrast, peptide analogs with higher affinity for I-Au caused T cell deletion (14). Muraro et al. reported that an immunodominant myelin basic protein-(111–129) peptide that binds weakly to DRB1*0401 is recognized by a restricted TCR repertoire, suggesting that only high affinity TCRs might be able to efficiently engage such unstable peptide/HLA complexes (15), also supporting the differential avidity model. These data suggest that either high affinity peptides or extremely low affinity or nonbinding peptides lead to loss of responding T cells due to negative thymic selection or failure of positive selection, respectively. The remaining intermediate to poor affinity peptides could be autoantigenic peptides.

What factors choose immunodominant peptides from among all intermediate to poor affinity peptides One possible idea relates to their higher affinity. For example, Kozhich et al. reported that enhanced affinity of an autoimmune peptide for MHC molecules increases both immunogenicity and immunopathogenicity (16). Other than the binding affinity of peptides for MHC molecules, several other factors may contribute to the immunodominance of peptides. These include the variations in antigen proteolysis in antigen-presenting cells, composition of the T cell repertoire, and molecular mimicry.

Geluk et al. (17) proposed a DR3-specific peptide binding motif composed of two different submotifs: n = I, L,V, M, Y, F; n + 3 = D (submotif 1); or n = I, L,V, M,Y, F, A; n + 3 = D, N,Q, E, S, T; n + 5 = K, R, H (submotif 2). Mycobacterium tuberculosis 65-kDa hsp-(3–13) (KTIAYDEEARR), which was used as an indicator peptide in this study, includes the submotif 1. It is noteworthy that TSHR-(109–124), which has the submotif 1, showed extremely high affinity almost equal to that of the hsp-(3–13) peptide.

However, there is no clear relation between the motifs and immunogenicity of the TSHR peptides and binding affinity of the TSHR peptides for DR3 molecule (Tables 1Go and 2Go), suggesting that surrounding amino acids or other factors may alter binding. If peptides with high affinity cannot be immunodominant, as we described above, the lack of relation may be logical.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. DR3-specific peptide binding motif in TSHR peptides

 
The mechanism of predisposition to GD associated with certain HLA class II molecule will be made clearer by examining the characteristics of binding of TSHR peptides to HLA class II molecules not associated with TSHR autoimmunity, particularly a GD-protective HLA class II molecule. Although we did not examine any other HLA class II molecules except DR3 in this study, Schmidt et al. showed that part of the mechanism for MHC-linked resistance to autoimmunity is negative selection of pathogenic autoreactive T cells (18), implying high affinity of at least some immunodominant peptides for disease-protective MHC molecules. Some reports suggest that the DRB1*0701,DQA1*0201 haplotype has a protective effect against GD (3, 19). It will be of interest to examine the characteristics of binding of TSHR peptides to these HLA class II molecules.

Our finding that immunogenic TSHR peptides bind to a GD-predisposing DR3 molecule with intermediate affinity provides additional information on the mechanism of HLA-associated susceptibility to autoimmune diseases and suggests that these interactions may shape the T cell repertoire. These observations may be applied to therapy by use of competing peptides with altered affinity for HLA molecule.

Received April 2, 1999.

Revised September 17, 1999.

Accepted October 20, 1999.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Grumet FC, Payne RO, Konishi J, Kriss JP. 1974 HLA antigens as markers for disease susceptibility and autoimmunity in Graves’ disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 39:1115–1119.[Medline]
  2. Allanic H, Faucher R, Lorcy Y, Heim J, Gueguen M, Leguerrier A, Genetet B. 1980 HLA and Graves’ disease: an association with HLA-DRw3. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 51:863–867.[Abstract]
  3. Yanagawa T, Mangklabruks A, Chang YB, Okamoto Y, Fisfalen ME, Curran PG, DeGroot LJ. 1993 Human histocompatibility leukocyte antigen-DQA1*0501 allele associated with genetic susceptibility to Graves’ disease in a caucasian population. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 76:1569–1574.[Abstract]
  4. Barlow ABT, Wheatcroft N, Watson P, Weetman AP. 1996 Association of HLA-DQA1*0501 with Graves’ disease in English caucasian men and women. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 44:73–77.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Soliman M, Kaplan E, Yanagawa T, Hidaka Y, Fisfalen ME, DeGroot LJ. 1995 T-cells recognize multiple epitopes in the human thyrotropin receptor extra- cellular domain. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 80:905–914.[Abstract]
  6. Fisfalen ME, Palmer EM, Seventer GAV, et al. 1997 Thyrotropin-receptor and thyroid peroxidase-specific T cell clones and their cytokine profile in autoimmune thyroid disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 82:3655–3663.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Geluk A, Bloemhoff W, De Vries RRP, Ottenhoff THM. 1992 Binding of a major T cell epitope of mycobacteria to a specific pocket within HLA-DRw17 (DR3) molecules. Eur J Immunol. 22:107–113.[Medline]
  8. Sidney J, Oseroff C, Southwood S, Wall M, Ishioka G, Koning F, Sette A. 1992 DRB1*0301 molecules recognize a structural motif distinct from the one recognized by most DR1 alleles. J Immunol. 149:2634–2640.[Abstract]
  9. Houghten RA. 1985 General method for the rapid solid phase synthesis of large numbers of peptides: specificity of antigen-antibody interaction at the level of individual amino acids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 82:5131–5135.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Joosten I, Wauben MHM, Holewijn MC, et al. 1994 Direct binding of autoimmune disease related T cell epitopes to purified Lewis rat MHC class II molecules. Int Immunol. 6:751–759.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Mason K, Denney Jr DW, McConnell HM. 1995 Myelin basic protein peptide complexes with the class molecules I-Au and I-Ak form and dissociate rapidly at neutral pH. J Immunol. 154:5216–5227.[Abstract]
  12. Carrasco-Marin E, Shimizu J, Kanagawa O, Unanue ER. 1996 The class II MHC I-Ag7 molecules from non-obese diabetic mice are poor peptide binders. J Immunol. 156:450–458.[Abstract]
  13. Ashton-Rickardt, PG, Tonegawa S. 1994 A differential-avidity model for T-cell selection. Immunol Today. 15:362–366.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Liu GY, Fairchild PJ, Smith RM, Prowle JR, Kioussis D, Wraith DC. 1995 Low avidity recognition of self-antigen by T cells permits escape from central tolerance. Immunity. 3:407–415.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Muraro PA, Vergelli M, Kalbus M, et al. 1997 Immunodominance of a low-affinity major histocompatibility complex-binding myelin basic protein epitope (residues 111–129) in HLA-DR4 (B1*0401) subjects is associated with a restricted T cell receptor repertoire. J Clin Invest. 100:339–349.[Medline]
  16. Kozhich AT, Caspi RR, Berzofsky JA, Gery I. 1997 Immunogenicity and immunopathogenicity of an autoimmune epitope are potentiated by increasing MHC binding through residue substitution. J Immunol. 158:4145–4151.[Abstract]
  17. Geluk, A, Van Meijgaarden KE, Southwood S, et al. 1994 HLA-DR3 molecules can bind peptides carrying two alternative specific submotifs. J Immunol. 152:5742–5748.[Abstract]
  18. Schmidt D, Verdaguer J, Averill N, Santamaria P. 1997 A mechanism for the major histocompatibility complex-linked resistance to autoimmunity. J Exp Med. 186:1059–1075.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Lavard L, Madsen HO, Perrild H, Jacobsen BB, Svejgaard A. 1997 HLA class II associations in juvenile Graves’ disease: indication of a strong protective role of the DRB1*0701,DQA1*0201 haplotype. Tissue Antigens. 50:639–641.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
A. Huber, F. Menconi, S. Corathers, E. M. Jacobson, and Y. Tomer
Joint Genetic Susceptibility to Type 1 Diabetes and Autoimmune Thyroiditis: from Epidemiology to Mechanisms
Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2008; 29(6): 697 - 725.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
H. Inaba, W. Martin, A. S. De Groot, S. Qin, and L. J. De Groot
Thyrotropin Receptor Epitopes and Their Relation to Histocompatibility Leukocyte Antigen-DR Molecules in Graves' Disease
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2006; 91(6): 2286 - 2294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
Y. Tomer and T. F. Davies
Searching for the Autoimmune Thyroid Disease Susceptibility Genes: From Gene Mapping to Gene Function
Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2003; 24(5): 694 - 717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sawai, Y.
Right arrow Articles by DeGroot, L. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sawai, Y.
Right arrow Articles by DeGroot, L. J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
*Genetics Home Reference


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals