help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marcus, R.
Right arrow Articles by Quigley, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marcus, R.
Right arrow Articles by Quigley, C. A.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 85, No. 3 1032-1037
Copyright © 2000 by The Endocrine Society


Original Studies

The Contribution of Testosterone to Skeletal Development and Maintenance: Lessons from the Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome

Robert Marcus, Donna Leary, Diane L. Schneider, Elizabeth Shane, Murray Favus and Charmian A. Quigley

Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Department of Medicine, Stanford University (R.M., D.L.), Palo Alto, California 94304; Department of Medicine, University of California-San Diego School of Medicine (D.L.S.), La Jolla, California 92093; Department of Medicine Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons (E.S.), New York, New York 10032; Department of Medicine, University of Chicago School of Medicine (M.E.), Chicago, Illinois 60637; and Indiana University (C.A.Q.), Indianapolis, Indiana 46285

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Robert Marcus, M.D., GRECC 182-B, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 3801 Miranda Avenue, Palo Alto, California 94304.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Although androgen status affects bone mass in women and men, an androgen requirement for skeletal normalcy has not been established. Women with androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS) have 46,XY genotypes with androgen receptor abnormalities rendering them partially or completely refractory to androgen. Twenty-eight women with AIS (22 complete and 6 high grade partial), aged 11–65 yr, responded to questionnaires about health history, gonadal surgery, and exogenous estrogen use and underwent bone mineral density (BMD) assessment by dual energy x-ray absortiometry. BMD values at the lumbar spine and proximal femur were compared to age-specific female normative values and listed as z-scores. Average height for adults in this cohort, 174 cm (68.5 in.), was moderately increased compared with the average height of adult American women of 162.3 cm, with skewing toward higher values: 5 women exceeded 6 ft in height, and 30% of the 18 adult women with complete AIS exceeded 5 ft, 11 in. in height. The average lumbar spine and hip BMD z-scores of the 6 women with partial AIS did not differ from population norms. In contrast, the average lumbar spine BMD z-score of women with complete AIS was significantly reduced at -1.08 (P = 0.0003), whereas the average value for hip BMD did not differ from normal. When BMD was compared between women who reported good estrogen replacement therapy compliance and those who reported poor compliance, there was a significantly greater deficit at the spine for women with poor compliance (z = -2.15 ± 0.15 vs. -0.75 ± 0.28; P < .0001). Furthermore, hip BMD was also significantly reduced in the noncompliant group (z = -0.95 ± .40). Comparison of BMD values to normative male standards gave z-score reductions (z = -1.81 ± 0.36) greater than those observed with female standards. Because of the high prevalence of tall stature in this study sample, we calculated bone mineral apparent density, a variable that adjusts for differences in bone size. Even for the estrogen-compliant group, bone mineral apparent density z-scores were subnormal at both the spine (z = -1.3 ± 0.43; P < 0.01) and the hip (z = -1.38 ± 0.28; P = 0.017). Six women with complete AIS had sustained cortical bone fractures, of whom 3 reported multiple (>3) fractures. We conclude that even when compliance to exogenous estrogen use is excellent, women with complete AIS show moderate deficits in spine BMD, averaging close to 1 SD from normative means, and that with correction of BMD for bone size, skeletal deficits are magnified and include the proximal femur. The results suggest that severe osteopenia in some women with AIS probably reflects a component of inadequate estrogen replacement rather than androgen lack alone.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
SUBSTANTIAL evidence supports a critical role for estrogen in the acquisition and maintenance of bone in both men and women. Although this statement is obviously true for women, for men, whose primary gonadal steroids are androgens, it may appear to be counterintuitive. Nonetheless, men bearing mutations in the estradiol receptor or in aromatase, the enzyme that converts androgens to estrogen, fail to undergo accelerated growth during puberty and show profound deficits in adult bone mass (1, 2, 3, 4). By contrast, the skeletal roles of androgens remain less clear. Osteoporosis as a consequence of male hypogonadism is well described (5), with at least partial restitution of bone mineral density (BMD) when testosterone is replaced. In addition, circulating concentrations of androgens have been reported to be independent predictors of BMD in healthy young women (6, 7), androgen administration improves BMD in older osteoporotic women (8), and incorporation of androgenic steroids into treatment regimens for such women promotes gains in BMD beyond those seen with estrogen alone (9). The presence of specific high affinity androgen receptors in bone cells is prerequisite for direct actions of androgen on bone, and the androgen receptor is expressed by osteoblast-like cells (10, 11, 12). However, even though dihydrotestosterone, a nonaromatizable androgen, has been shown to increase the expression of some osteoblast-specific proteins in cultured cells (13, 14), the fact that androgens undergo aromatization to estrogens in vivo (15, 16, 17) leaves open the possibility that some component of androgen action might reflect a downstream effect of estrogen.

The syndrome of androgen insensitivity (AIS), previously known as testicular feminization, offers a unique opportunity to evaluate the consequences of a total or near-total lack of androgen action. AIS is caused by mutations in the androgen receptor producing impaired to complete lack of response to endogenous and exogenous androgens (18). Individuals with complete AIS possess a normal male 46,XY genotype and functioning testes (19, 20). They are phenotypic females who undergo normal breast development at puberty (if testes are in situ), but have complete absence of androgen-dependent body hair and Müllerian duct structures in most cases. Consequently, patients with complete AIS experience life-long amenorrhea. Beginning at the onset of puberty, those with gonads in situ have high serum concentrations of both testosterone and estradiol (21, 22) that persist until surgical gonadectomy, which is undertaken eventually in all patients to prevent gonadal malignancy. Individuals with partial forms of AIS show variable degrees of virilization and sexual ambiguity, but even in the face of complete lack of androgen response, some anthropometric features, such as height and the dimensions of bone and teeth, are intermediate between typical male and female patterns (20).

To date, relatively little information has been published on the skeletal consequences of complete androgen insensitivity. Affected mice with this condition showed impaired long bone growth, possibly related to low circulating concentrations of insulin-like growth factor I (23). However, cancellous bone volume and density were similar to those in normal littermates, a finding attributed by the researchers to high serum estrogen concentrations. In humans, the results of isolated case reports and small series (24, 25, 26) indicate a high prevalence of low bone mineral density at clinically relevant sites, i.e. lumbar spine and proximal femur, but it is difficult in those reports to distinguish the effects of androgen resistance from those of estrogen lack. Our research group evaluated the skeletal mineralization status of a group of women with complete and high grade partial AIS to determine the effects of androgen resistance and exogenous estrogen on bone mass.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subjects

Attendees at annual gatherings of a national AIS support group were recruited by newsletter before their 1997 (San Diego, CA) and 1998 (Chicago, IL) meetings. Arrangements were made for volunteers to complete a standardized questionnaire and undergo measurement of height, weight, and BMD at the time of these meetings. Of approximately 70 North American women who received the initial mailing, 28 agreed to participate. Those who were unable to attend the meetings completed the study protocol at a medical center near their home. Each participant gave written informed consent, and the protocol was approved by the Administrative Panel on Research with Human Subjects, Stanford University. For minor children, written consent was provided by a parent or legal guardian, with assent by the child.

Questionnaires

Adult participants self-completed a questionnaire that covered medical history, health habits, calcium and other dietary supplements, and environmental exposures. Questions concerning the diagnosis and severity of AIS included the age at which diagnosis was established, the age at gonadectomy, and the chronology and consistency of exogenous estrogen therapy following surgery. Exogenous estrogen use was summarized in consecutive 3-yr intervals after gonadectomy and addressed the preparation, dose, and frequency of administration of prescribed estrogen as well as the participant’s own assessment of her compliance with medication during that interval. Minor participants were administered the same questionnaire by a single member of the research group.

Each participant’s exposure to exogenous estrogen was rated on a four-point scale: excellent, adequate dose, promptly initiated, missed a few days only; good, occasional missed dose, less than 1 yr hiatus between surgery and initiation of treatment; fair, took more than 75% of prescribed medication but admitted long delays in onset and/or prolonged interruptions in treatment; and poor, several years of no estrogen treatment.

Classification of AIS grade

Each woman or her physician rated her degree of androgen insensitivity on a 1–7 scale using the pictorial grading system described by Quigley et al. (20), where grade 7 refers to complete AIS (Table 1Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. AIS grading system

 
Bone mineral assessment

BMDs at the lumbar spine and femoral neck were determined by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Ten women underwent DXA examination at the time of their AIS support group meeting. Six women were examined at the University of California-San Diego in September 1997 using Hologic, Inc., equipment (QDR 1000, Hologic, Inc., Bedford, MA; supervised by D.S.). Four women underwent DXA examination at the University of Chicago in September 1998 using Lunar Corp. equipment (Lunar Corp., Madison, WI; supervised by M.F.). Twelve women underwent DXA examinations at their local institutions. In each case, the accuracy and completeness of the report were verified by telephone contact with the densitometry laboratory director. Two participants each underwent the study protocol at the Columbia University (ES), Indiana University (CQ), and Palo Alto Veterans Affairs (RM) Medical Centers. Of the 28 subjects, 20 were studied with Hologic, Inc., and 8 with Lunar Corp. equipment.

Bone mineral results are reported here as BMD z-scores compared to current instrument-specific NHANES-congruent age-related normative data for females. Normative data z-scores represent the number of SDs by which a given result differs from the nominal age-related mean value. A value at the age-predicted mean would have a z-score value of 0. BMD, in grams per cm2, is calculated by dividing the estimated mineral content of a region of interest by the area of that region. Thus, BMD is an areal measurement, not a true volumetric density, and is subject to error when measurements are made in individuals who are particularly tall or short (27). Therefore, as the distribution of heights of the study subjects was skewed toward tall stature, we calculated an additional variable, bone mineral apparent density (BMAD), which largely corrects for the confounding effects of bone size. BMAD has been described and validated previously in our laboratory (27, 28). Age-specific BMAD z-scores were calculated using normative data that we have generated in-house and published in part (29).

For attendees at the San Diego, Chicago, Indianapolis, New York, and Palo Alto bone density laboratories, height and weight were measured with wall-mounted stadiometers and balance beam or electronic scales. For the women who obtained BMD measurements privately, all but two of the individual laboratory directors confirmed that measurements were made in the laboratory at the time that bone density examination was obtained.

Data handling and analysis

Data were entered into the StatView V statistical software package (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC). Group z-score results for the study cohort were compared to a value of zero using one-sample t tests. Analyses were two-tailed, and P < 0.05 was designated as the criterion for significance. The z-scores for individual subjects were obtained from the densitometer-specific normative databases published by the manufacturers. In general, we compared study results to normative female databases. However, because some gender-specific skeletal characteristics may reflect the function of genes and factors that are related to chromosomal complement rather than to sex steroid hormones, we also made some comparisons against normative male standards. Descriptive data are presented in Table 2Go as the mean ± SD or ranges, and z-scores are presented in the text as the mean ± SEM and in the figures as box plots (see Fig. 1Go for explanation).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Characteristics of subjects with AIS

 


View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Height distribution for adults with AIS.

 

    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
All 28 participants had at least grade 5 AIS. Twenty-two women rated themselves as having complete or near-complete AIS (grade 6–7), and the remaining 6 had partial AIS, grade 5. Four participants with complete AIS, aged 11, 12.75, 14, and 14 yr, were considered not to have attained adult height and were not included in the height analysis. The mean height for the 24 adult subjects, 174 cm (68.5 in.), was increased for adult women compared with the mean adult height of North American women of 163.6 cm (64.4 in.). Height did not differ between complete and partial AIS groups, but the distribution of heights was skewed toward tall stature (Fig. 1Go); 5 of the 24 adult women (20.8%) in the total cohort exceeded 6 ft in height. Of the 18 adult women with complete AIS, 7 (38.8%) exceeded approximately 5 ft, 11 in. in height (180 cm), and 2 women were more than 6 ft tall. One of 6 women with partial AIS was 5 ft, 10 in. in height, and another was 6 ft tall.

Gonadectomy and estrogen replacement status

The average age at gonadectomy was 15.4 yr for the complete AIS group and 14.0 for the partial AIS group (Table 3Go). Two participants with complete AIS (aged 12 and 14 yr) had not yet undergone gonadectomy. All subjects but 1 initiated estrogen replacement within the first several months after surgery. One individual began estrogen replacement the following year. The dominant estrogen used for replacement was conjugated equine estrogens (Premarin). In 10 instances estrogen was initiated at higher than standard replacement doses (0.9 or 1.25 mg/day), although 4 patients, including 2 14-yr-old and 1 11-yr-old girls, began at a 0.3-mg daily dose, which was later increased in 3 of them.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Estrogen use and compliance results for women with AIS

 
Bone mineral status

Women with partial AIS had average z-scores for both lumbar spine and hip BMD that did not differ significantly from zero, indicating no deficit in BMD in that group compared with age-specific normative values. For those with complete AIS, the average lumbar spine BMD z-score of -1.08 was significantly lower than zero (P = 0.0003), but values at the hip did not differ significantly from zero (Fig. 2Go). Among 18 adults with complete AIS, 2 met WHO criteria for osteoporosis at the lumbar spine (t score, less than -2.5), and 1 met this criterion for the femoral neck (30). An additional 8 women met WHO criteria for osteopenia (t score, less than -1.0) at the spine, as did 6 women at the femoral neck (Table 3Go).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Box plots of lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD z-scores for 28 adults with AIS. Values were compared to those in the nominal population means by single sample t tests. Clear boxes, Complete AIS (n = 22); hatched boxes, partial AIS (n = 6). These plots illustrate the mean value as a horizontal line. The vertical limits of the box define the 25th and 75th percentiles, and the error bars denote the 10th and 90th percentiles. For complete AIS, spine BMD z-scores were significantly lower than predicted. No BMD deficit at either spine or hip was found for partial AIS. *, P = 0.0003.

 
Relationship of bone mineral status to estrogen exposure

We considered it likely that skeletal deficits would be exaggerated in women whose adherence to estrogen replacement was poor. We therefore analyzed BMD separately for adult women who had shown excellent or good compliance (designated compliant) and for women whose compliance had been fair or poor (designated noncompliant). At the lumbar spine, both compliance groups had BMD z-scores significantly below zero; the BMD z-score of noncompliant women (mean ± SEM, -2.15 ± 0.15) was significantly lower than that of the compliant group (-0.75 ± 0.28; Fig. 3Go). At the femoral neck, only the noncompliant group showed an average BMD z-score that was significantly lower than zero (-0.95 ± 0.40). When the lumbar spine BMD of the estrogen-compliant group was compared to normative male standards, the average z-score was almost 2 SD below the mean for age-matched males (-1.81 ± 0.36; P < 0.0001).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Box plots of lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD z-scores for 18 women with complete AIS by degree of compliance with estrogen replacement therapy. Teenage subjects, 2 of whom had not yet undergone gonadectomy, were excluded from this analysis. Values were compared to nominal population means by single sample t tests. Clear boxes, Poor and fair compliance; hatched boxes, good and excellent compliance. Interpretation of box plots is described in Fig. 2Go. *, P = 0.06; **, P = 0.02; ***, P = 0.0001 (compared to normative mean z-score of 0). #, P = 0.005 (good vs. fair compliance).

 
The 11-yr-old participant, who had undergone gonadectomy at age 1.5 yr, had not yet started estrogen therapy and had a lumbar spine BMD z-score of -1.5. By contrast, one 14-yr-old and the 12-yr-old girl who had not yet undergone gonadectomy had z-scores of 0.9 and 0.0, respectively. The other 14-yr-old girl, whose z-score was -0.1, had undergone gonadectomy during infancy and reported having been compliant with estrogen replacement for several years. No significant relationship was observed between time of gonadectomy and bone mineral status.

Bone mineral apparent density

In the estrogen-compliant group in which the average uncorrected femoral neck BMD z-score did not differ from zero, the calculated BMAD z-score was significantly lower than normal (z = -1.38 ± 0.28; P = 0.017; Fig. 4Go). Similarly, the significant deficit shown in lumbar spine BMD z-score for this group was magnified for BMAD (z = -1.3 ± 0.43; P < 0.01).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Effect of size adjustment on bone density z-scores for estrogen-compliant women. Box plots on the left show age-specific BMD z-scores. Those on the right show z-scores for BMAD. Interpretation of box plots is described in Fig. 2Go. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; #, P = 0.017 (compared to nominal mean population z-scores of 0).

 
Lifestyle factors

No significant associations were observed between bone mass measurements and self-reported calcium intake, tobacco or alcohol use, or habitual physical activity. Six women with complete AIS reported having experienced a fracture in the past. Three of these women reported multiple (n = 3–6) fractures. All of these appeared to have been the consequence of some degree of trauma. No relationship of fracture history to bone mass was observed.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We conducted this study to determine whether individuals who are constitutionally unable to respond to androgens exhibit deficits in bone mass. The results indicate that as a group, women with complete AIS have values for lumbar spine BMD that remain within the normal range, but fall, on the average, about 1 SD below mean values for age. Although bone mineral deficits of this magnitude are not trivial, they are by no means as severe as has been observed for individuals lacking the capacity to synthesize or respond to estrogen (1, 2, 3). Our results are similar to those of Bertelloni et al. (24), who reported lumbar spine DXA values for 10 young patients (4.7–19.8 yr) with complete AIS, 6 of whom were studied after gonadectomy while taking exogenous estrogen. In that study, areal BMD and an estimate of volumetric BMD showed deficits of 30% and 35%, respectively, compared to those in a small group of controls and also fell below published normative values for age-matched males and females. Our results are consistent with those of other small series (24, 25) as well as with a report by Schwartz et al. (31), who evaluated BMD in a group of 12 subjects with AIS and 16 subjects with mutations in the enzyme 5{alpha}-reductase, which converts testosterone to dihydrotestosterone. In that report, average spine and femoral neck z-scores for the AIS patients were reduced at -2.8 and -1.33, respectively, whereas those for the 5{alpha}-reductase-deficient patients were -0.84 and 0. 14, respectively. In that analysis, AIS z-scores were compared to male normative data, with results very similar to those of the present study. Schwartz et al. (31) concluded that deficiency of a single androgen (dihydrotestosterone) does not substantially affect BMD, whereas loss of all direct androgen action (AIS) does.

Although our finding that even estrogen-compliant women with complete AIS have subnormal spine BMD is compatible with the idea that skeletal acquisition and maintenance requires the independent participation of androgens, other possible interpretations require consideration. The most obvious of these concerns the adequacy of estrogen exposure. If removal of the gonads is delayed until puberty or later, adolescent girls with AIS will probably be exposed to very high concentrations of endogenous estrogen (21). However, after orchidectomy, exposure to estrogen may be insufficient to maintain bone mass, because of either delayed initiation or poor compliance with estrogen therapy. It is also possible that higher doses of estrogen may be necessary to maintain BMD in younger individuals with AIS than the typical replacement regimens used to prevent bone loss in the early postmenopausal period. In this study, women rated as having been poorly compliant with estrogen therapy showed significantly lower BMD than those with good or excellent compliance ratings. However, even those women who promptly started and fastidiously maintained estrogen replacement showed a significant deficit in lumbar spine BMD and in both lumbar and femoral BMAD.

One could argue that typical replacement doses of estrogen might not fully compensate for a lack of periodic surges in circulating estradiol normally observed during midfollicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle. However, this concept may be countered by our results in women with partial AIS. In these subjects, no detectable BMD deficits were observed despite the fact that their hormone exposure postgonadectomy was similar to that of the complete AIS women, and they, too, experienced no phase-specific surges in estrogen. It is also possible that as yet undefined alterations in the overall hormonal and growth factor milieu of patients with AIS could underlie their observed skeletal deficits.

The superior BMD of subjects with partial relative to complete AIS suggests a somewhat protective effect of the limited degree of androgen responsiveness of those with partial AIS. Thus, with deference to the possibilities outlined above, we consider it likely that the lack of a direct skeletal action of androgen underlies at least part of the bone mineralization deficits observed in women with complete AIS.

These results provide yet another illustration of the importance of considering bone mass measurements in relation to skeletal size. In this study, adjustment for body size was necessitated by a skewing of heights toward tall stature, an observation that has been made previously and has been suggested to reflect some process attributable to a stature-determining function of the Y chromosome. Although deficits in BMD were relatively modest and confined to the spine in estrogen-compliant women, BMAD size adjustment revealed that low bone mass in AIS women is both more severe and more generalized than would otherwise have been evident.

The clinical significance of skeletal deficits in AIS women is not clear. Bone density deficits of 1 SD are associated with a 2- to 3-fold long-term increase in fracture risk. Six of the 22 (27%) women with complete AIS in this study had sustained at least 1 fracture in the past, and 3 women had suffered multiple fractures. None of these appeared to be a fragility fracture. It is now clear that even traumatic fractures occur with greater frequency in adolescents with lower bone mass. Of the 6 women with a previous fracture, 3 met WHO criteria for osteopenia, and 3 had apparently normal BMD. The expected annual fracture incidence in the United States is 3% for girls 6–16 yr of age (32), and 27% of girls have sustained at least one fracture before age 16 yr (33). Given such a high prevalence of fracture in the normal population, it is clear that the present small study lacks sufficient power to permit conclusions regarding an excessive fracture rate.

Some limitations to this study warrant mention. Despite the fact that this sample of women with AIS is the largest to have been reported, it remains fairly small, so that power to identify low order associations is severely constrained. The study group was a convenience sample of patients with AIS, and we cannot know whether the observed results are generalizable to the rest of the AIS population. An additional issue concerning this group of women also warrants comment. The average age at gonadectomy, close to 15 yr, reflects standard practice in the 1970s that was substantially replaced in the 1980s by a tendency to remove the gonads during infancy for girls in whom an early diagnosis was made. Girls with AIS managed during the 1980s and 1990s with early gonadectomy will probably have been exposed to considerably less estrogen before puberty than most of our study subjects, whose gonads remained in situ until completion of puberty. Although it is not possible to generalize based on the small number of pubertal girls with AIS included in this study, it is of interest that the girl who had undergone gonadectomy in infancy and had not yet received estrogen had a rather low lumbar spine z-score. In the absence of clear guidelines for the timing and dosage of pubertal hormone replacement therapy in girls with AIS, whose needs may differ from those of other hypogonadal teens (such as those with Turner syndrome), it is important to monitor these girls for skeletal milestones, such as the pubertal growth spurt, adult height, and bone mineralization.

Received July 28, 1999.

Revised November 2, 1999.

Accepted November 19, 1999.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Smith EP, Boyd J, Frank GR, et al. 1994 Estrogen resistance caused by a mutation in the estrogen receptor gene in a man [Erratum, N Engl J Med. 1995, 332:131]. N Engl J Med. 331:1056–1061
  2. Morishima A, Grumbaach MM, Simpson ER, Fisher C, Qin K. 1995 Aromatase deficiency in male and female siblings caused by a novel mutation and the physiological role of estrogens. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 80:3689–3598.[Abstract]
  3. Carani C, Qin K, Simoni M, et al. 1997 Effect of testosterone and estradiol in a man with aromatase deficiency. N Engl Med J. 337:91–95.[Free Full Text]
  4. Bilezikian JP, Morishima A, Bell J, Grumbach MM. 1998 Increased bone mass as a result of estrogen therapy in a man with aromatase deficiency. N Engl J Med. 339:599–603.[Free Full Text]
  5. Orwoll E, Klein R. 1996 Osteoporosis in men: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical characterization. In: Marcus R, Feldman D, Kelsey J, eds. Osteoporosis. San Diego: Academic Press; 745–784.
  6. Buchanan JR, Hospodar, Myers C, Leuenberger P, Demers LM. 1998 Effect of excess endogenous androgens on bone density in young women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 67:937–943.[Abstract]
  7. Steinberg KK, Freni-Titulaer LW, DePeuy EG, et al. 1989 Sex steroids and bone density in premenopausal and postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 69:533–539.[Abstract]
  8. Need GA, Horowitz M, Bridges A, et al. 1989 Effects of nandrolone decanoate and anti-resorptive therapy on vertebral density in osteoporotic women. Arch Intern Med. 149:57–60.[Abstract]
  9. Christiansen C, Riis BJ. 1990 17ß-estradiol and continuous norethisterone: a unique treatment for established osteoporosis in elderly women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 71:836–841.[Abstract]
  10. Colvard D, Eriksen E, Keeting P, et al. 1989 Evidence of steroid receptors in human osteoblast-like cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 86:854–857.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Benz DJ, Haussler MR, Thomas MA, Speelman B, Komm BS. 1991 High-affinity androgen binding, and androgenic regulation of {alpha}1(1) procollagen and transforming growth factor-ß steady state messenger ribonucleic acid levels in human osteoblast-like osteosarcoma cells. Endocrinology. 128:2723–2730.[Abstract]
  12. Abu EO, Horner A, Kusec V, Triffitt JT, Compston JE. 1997 The localization of androgen receptors in human bone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 82:3493–3497.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Kasperk C, Fitzsimmons R, Strong D, Mohan S, Jennings J, Wergedal J, Baylink DJ. 1990 Studies of the mechanism by which androgens enhance mitogenesis and differentiation in bone cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 71:1322–1329.[Abstract]
  14. Takeuchi M, Kakushi H, Tohkin M. 1994 Androgens directly stimulate mineralization and increase androgen receptors in human osteoblast-like osteosarcoma cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 204:905–911.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. West CD, Damast BL, Sarro SD, Pearson OH. 1956 Conversion of testosterone to estrogens in castrated, adrenalectomized human females. J Biol Chem. 218:409–418.[Free Full Text]
  16. Tanaka S, Haji M, Nishi Y, Yanase T, Takayanagi R, Nawata H. 1993 Aromatase activity in human osteoblast-like cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 52:107–109.
  17. Purohit A, Flanagan AM, Reed MJ. 1992 Estrogen synthesis by osteoblast cell lines. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 61:152–157.[Abstract]
  18. Brown TR, Lubahn DB, Wilson EM, Joseph DR, French FS, Migeon CJ. 1988 Deletion of the steroid-binding domain of the human androgen receptor gene in one family with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome: evidence for further genetic heterogeneity in this syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 85:8152–8155.
  19. Morris JM. 1953 The syndrome of testicular feminization in male pseudohermaphrodites. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 65:1192–1211.[Medline]
  20. Quigley CA, De Bellis A, Marschke KB, El-Awady MK, Wilson EM, French FS. 1995 Androgen receptor defects: historical, clinical, and molecular perspectives. Endocr Rev. 16:271–316.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. French FS, Baggett B, Van Wyk JJ, Talbert LM, Hubbard WR, Johnston FR, Weaver RP. 1965 Testicular feminization: clinical, morphological and biochemical studies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1965:25:661–677.
  22. MacDonald PC, Madden JD, Brenner PF, Wilson JD, Siiteri PK. 1979 Origin of estrogen in normal men and in women with testicular feminization. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 49:905–916.[Abstract]
  23. Vanderscheuren D, Van Herck E, Suiker AMH, et al. 1993 Bone, Mineral Metabolism in the androgen-resistant (testicular feminized) male rat. J Bone Miner Res. 8:801–809.[Medline]
  24. Munoz-Torres M, Jodar E, Quesada M, Escobar-Jimenez F. 1995 Bone mass in androgen-insensitivity syndrome: response to hormonal replacement therapy. Calcif Tissue Int. 57:94–96.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Soule SG, Conway G, Prelevic GM, Prentice M, Ginsburg J, Jacobs HS. 1995 Osteopenia as a feature of the androgen insensitivity syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 43:671–675.[Medline]
  26. Bertelloni S, Baroncelli GI, Federico G, Cappa M, Lala R, Saggese G. 1998 Altered bone mineral density in patients with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome. Horm Res. 50:309–314.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Katzman DK, Bachrach LK, Carter DR, Marcus R. 1991 Clinical and anthropometric correlates of bone mineral acquisition in healthy adolescent girls. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 73:1332–1339.[Abstract]
  28. Carter DR, Bouxsein ML, Marcus R. 1992 New approaches for interpreting projected bone densitometry data. J Bone Miner Res. 7:137–145.[Medline]
  29. Budhikanok GS, Wang M-C, Eckert K, Matkin C, Marcus R, Bachrach LK. 1996 Differences in bone density (BMD) in young Asian- and Caucasian-Americans reflects differences in bone size. J Bone Miner Res. 11:1545–1556.[Medline]
  30. Kanis JA, Melton III LJ, Christiansen C, Johnston Jr CC, Haltaev N. 1994 Perspective: the diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 9:1137–1142.[Medline]
  31. Schwartz BD, Zhu Y-S, Cordero J, Imperato-McGinley J. 5{alpha}-Reductase deficiency and complete androgen insensitivity: natural models to suggest a direct role for androgens on bone density in men [Abstract OR23–1]. Proc of the 81st Annual Meet of The Endocrine Society, 1999.
  32. Grazier KL, Holboook TL, Kelsey JL, Stauffer RN. 1984 The frequency of occurrence, impact, and cost of musculoskeletal conditions in the United Sates. Chicago: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 72–80.
  33. Lyons RA, Delahunty AM, Kraus D. 1999 Children’s fractures: a population based study. Injury Prevention. 5:129–132.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IBMS BoneKEyHome page
K. Venken, R. Bouillon, and D. Vanderschueren
Androgens Versus Estrogens: Different Theories About Opposing Actions on Periosteal Bone Expansion
IBMS BoneKEy, April 1, 2008; 5(4): 130 - 136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IBMS BoneKEyHome page
J.-P. Bonjour and T. Chevalley
Pubertal Timing, Peak Bone Mass and Fragility Fracture Risk
IBMS BoneKEy, February 1, 2007; 4(2): 30 - 48.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
V. Sobel, B. Schwartz, Y.-S. Zhu, J. J. Cordero, and J. Imperato-McGinley
Bone Mineral Density in the Complete Androgen Insensitivity and 5{alpha}-Reductase-2 Deficiency Syndromes
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2006; 91(8): 3017 - 3023.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
N. A. Sims, K. Brennan, J. Spaliviero, D. J. Handelsman, and M. J. Seibel
Perinatal testosterone surge is required for normal adult bone size but not for normal bone remodeling
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, March 1, 2006; 290(3): E456 - E462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
D. Vanderschueren, K. Venken, J. Ophoff, R. Bouillon, and S. Boonen
Sex Steroids and the Periosteum--Reconsidering the Roles of Androgens and Estrogens in Periosteal Expansion
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2006; 91(2): 378 - 382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IBMS BoneKEyHome page
K. Venken and D. Vanderschueren
Dual Mode of Action of Androgens on the Skeleton: Are Androgen Receptor and Estrogen Receptor Activation Equally Important at the Same Time and Place?
IBMS BoneKEy, January 1, 2006; 3(1): 15 - 17.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
A. Aminorroaya, S. Kelleher, A. J Conway, L. P Ly, and D. J Handelsman
Adequacy of androgen replacement influences bone density response to testosterone in androgen-deficient men
Eur. J. Endocrinol., June 1, 2005; 152(6): 881 - 886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
J. D. Veldhuis, J. N. Roemmich, E. J. Richmond, A. D. Rogol, J. C. Lovejoy, M. Sheffield-Moore, N. Mauras, and C. Y. Bowers
Endocrine Control of Body Composition in Infancy, Childhood, and Puberty
Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2005; 26(1): 114 - 146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. Gennari, R. Nuti, and J. P. Bilezikian
Aromatase Activity and Bone Homeostasis in Men
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2004; 89(12): 5898 - 5907.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
D. Vanderschueren, L. Vandenput, S. Boonen, M. K. Lindberg, R. Bouillon, and C. Ohlsson
Androgens and Bone
Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2004; 25(3): 389 - 425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Wickman, E. Kajantie, and L. Dunkel
Effects of Suppression of Estrogen Action by the P450 Aromatase Inhibitor Letrozole on Bone Mineral Density and Bone Turnover in Pubertal Boys
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2003; 88(8): 3785 - 3793.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. Compston
Local Biosynthesis of Sex Steroids in Bone
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2002; 87(12): 5398 - 5400.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Issa, D. Schnabel, M. Feix, L. Wolf, H.-E. Schaefer, D. W. Russell, and H.-U. Schweikert
Human Osteoblast-Like Cells Express Predominantly Steroid 5{alpha}-Reductase Type 1
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2002; 87(12): 5401 - 5407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
B. L. Riggs, S. Khosla, and L. J. Melton III
Sex Steroids and the Construction and Conservation of the Adult Skeleton
Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2002; 23(3): 279 - 302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Khosla, L. J. Melton III, and B. L. Riggs
Estrogen and the Male Skeleton
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2002; 87(4): 1443 - 1450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.Home page
A. M. Matsumoto
Andropause: Clinical Implications of the Decline in Serum Testosterone Levels With Aging in Men
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., February 1, 2002; 57(2): M76 - 99.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. A. Quigley
The Postnatal Gonadotropin and Sex Steroid Surge--Insights from the Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2002; 87(1): 24 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S. C. Manolagas and S. Kousteni
Perspective: Nonreproductive Sites of Action of Reproductive Hormones
Endocrinology, June 1, 2001; 142(6): 2200 - 2204.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JRSMHome page
G. M Prelevic
Osteoporosis in men
J R Soc Med, January 12, 2001; 94(12): 620 - 623.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
P. Szulc, F. Munoz, B. Claustrat, P. Garnero, F. Marchand, F. Duboeuf, and P. D. Delmas
Bioavailable Estradiol May Be an Important Determinant of Osteoporosis in Men: The MINOS Study
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2001; 86(1): 192 - 199.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. B. Wisniewski, C. J. Migeon, H. F. L. Meyer-Bahlburg, J. P. Gearhart, G. D. Berkovitz, T. R. Brown, and J. Money
Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome: Long-Term Medical, Surgical, and Psychosexual Outcome
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2000; 85(8): 2664 - 2669.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marcus, R.
Right arrow Articles by Quigley, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marcus, R.
Right arrow Articles by Quigley, C. A.


HOME HELP