help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simchen, C.
Right arrow Articles by Aust, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Simchen, C.
Right arrow Articles by Aust, G.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 85, No. 12 4758-4764
Copyright © 2000 by The Endocrine Society


Original Studies

Expression and Regulation of Regulated on Activation, Normal T Cells Expressed and Secreted in Thyroid Tissue of Patients with Graves’ Disease and Thyroid Autonomy and in Thyroid-Derived Cell Populations1

C. Simchen, I. Lehmann, D. Sittig, M. Steinert and G. Aust

Institute of Anatomy (C.S., D.S., G.A.) and Department of Surgery (M.S.), University of Leipzig; and Center of Environmental Research (I.L.), Halle-Leipzig GmbH, Leipzig, Germany

Address correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Gabriela Aust, Institute of Anatomy, University of Leipzig, Liebigstr. 13, Leipzig 04103, Germany. E-mail: ausg{at}medizin.uni-leipzig.de


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Thyroid glands affected by Graves’ disease (GD) show striking lymphocytic infiltration, mainly by CD45RO+ T cells. The mechanisms by which the various lymphocytic subsets are recruited and maintained in the thyroid are unknown. RANTES (regulated on activation, normal T cells expressed and secreted) in interaction with its receptors (CCR1, CCR3, CCR4 and CCR5) may be one of the favorite chemokines involved in the cell trafficking and maintenance.

RANTES messenger RNA (mRNA) was quantified in the thyroid tissue of 16 patients with GD and 7 patients with thyroid autonomy (TA), using competitive RT-PCR. We found a clear correlation between the RANTES mRNA level and 1) the degree of T-cell infiltration (r = 0.68), and 2) the level of serum antibodies to thyroid peroxidase (r = 0.76) in GD but not in TA patients. There was no difference between the autonomous nodules and the quiescent surrounding tissue in TA patients.

To define the cellular source of RANTES mRNA and protein, we examined various thyroid-derived cells. Lymphocytes showed a markedly higher basal RANTES mRNA and protein level (mean ± SEM; pg/mL, n = 3; 140 ± 30) than thyrocytes (12 ± 5) and fibroblasts (9 ± 2). Lymphocyte stimulation with PMA enhanced RANTES secretion significantly (4490 ± 200). Fibroblasts responded to stimulation with interleukin 1 (530 ± 220) and tumor necrosis factor {alpha} (2780 ± 1790), whereas thyrocytes did not. However, some thyroid carcinoma cell lines showed very high basal and stimulated RANTES expression.

Lymphocytes expressed the mRNA of all chemokine receptors that bind RANTES. The number of CCR3+ and CCR5+ T cells was significantly higher in thyroid-derived leukocytes than in those in the peripheral blood stream.

We conclude that RANTES expression, mainly by lymphocytes, is perhaps involved in the maintenance of lymphocytic infiltration and, therefore, in the autoimmune responses in GD.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ONE OF THE hallmarks of thyroids affected by Graves’ disease (GD) is lymphocytic infiltration, principally by memory T (CD45R0+) and B cells (1, 2, 3). The trafficking and maintenance of immune cells is complex, involving the interactions of an entire superfamily of chemoattractant cytokines (chemokines) and their receptors (4, 5). The chemokine system provides the necessary flexibility for determining the migratory patterns of various types of leukocytes precisely (6). Chemokines are 8–10 kDa proteins that have been subdivided into four families on the basis of the relative position of their cysteine residues. Only the largest families (CC and CXC) have been extensively characterized. In contrast to CXC-chemokines, CC-chemokines do not act on neutrophils but attract lymphocytes, monocytes, and other leukocyte subsets with variable selectivity. So far as the thyroid is concerned, little information is available on the recruitment and maintenance of the various lymphocytic subsets by chemokines under normal and pathological conditions. The CC-chemokine RANTES (regulated on activation, normal T cells expressed and secreted) is one of those most likely to attract and maintain specific leukocyte subsets in the thyroid gland in GD because it is a chemoattractant for memory T cells and monocytes (7). Ashhab et al. (8) recently reported their demonstration of the marked expression of various types of chemokine messenger RNA (mRNA) in thyroid tissue, including RANTES. However, they did not find any significant difference in the expression of the latter in nonautoimmune multinodular goiter and GD. Analysis of the serum of their GD patients revealed no or only very low levels of autoantibodies against thyroid peroxidase (TPO), which is actually uncommon for these patients (9, 10, 11). No data are available on the cellular sources of RANTES, on RANTES regulation, or on the expression of those chemokine receptors able to bind RANTES in the thyroid gland.

The aim of our study was to investigate the expression of RANTES mRNA in the thyroid tissue of patients with GD who had low or high serum levels of antibodies against TPO and the TSH receptor [TSH-binding inhibiting immunoglobulin (TBII)]. Thyroid tissue of patients with thyroid autonomy (TA) , carefully separated in autonomous and quiescent tissue, was included in our study. The RANTES mRNA levels were related to the levels of thyroid autoantibodies and/or thyroidal T-cell infiltration. Because RANTES may be produced by a variety of cell types and induced by a variety of stimuli (12, 13), we further examined the expression and regulation of RANTES mRNA and protein in a number of thyroid-derived cells such as lymphocytes, thyrocytes, and fibroblasts. Thyroid carcinoma cell lines were used to confirm RANTES expression by thyrocytes. Expression of the CC-chemokine receptors CCR1, CCR3, CCR4, and CCR5 binding RANTES (5) was also investigated.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients

GD (2 males and 14 females; mean age ± SEM, 40.8 ± 2.8 yr) and TA (n = 7, all female; mean age ± SEM, 57.4 ± 2.8 yr) were diagnosed on the basis of its clinical, biochemical, and immunological features, as well as from scintiscans. Fourteen of 16 GD patients treated with methimazole or propylthiouracil for more than 8 months were clinically euthyroid and had normal free T4 and T3 levels at the time of operation. Two of the patients were undergoing surgery within 2 months after diagnosis without antithyroid drug treatment. From all patients with unifocal TA thyroid scans using Tc-99m, pertechnatate showed a single hot nodule with a low uptake in the rest of the thyroid.

Antibodies against the TSH receptor (TBII) and TPO were measured in serum obtained during the 2 weeks before operation with commercial RIA kits (Henning, Berlin, Germany). GD patients could be divided further into two groups of eight patients each: patients with high (>4000 U/mL) and patients with low (<200 U/mL) or zero serum anti-TPO levels. The correlation between the RANTES mRNA levels and the serum anti-TPO, TBII levels, or T lymphocytic infiltration (see below) was calculated by Spearman’s method.

Estimation of T-cell infiltration in thyroid sections

Thyroid samples from patients with GD were obtained at operation. The fat and connective tissue were removed immediately. In TA, the tissue was carefully separated in adenomous and quiescent tissue. In all cases, the presence of a capsule was checked. The samples were frozen and stored in liquid nitrogen until required. Cryostat sections (4 µm) were fixed in acetone (7 min), blocked, and stained with an anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody by the alkaline phosphatase antialkaline phosphatase method (all antibodies from Dianova, Hamburg, Germany), as described by Heuer et al. (14). After counterstaining with hematoxylin, the number of T cells was graded semiquantitatively (14, 15): 0 = no; 1 = few (<5%); 2 = moderate number of (5–25%); and 3 = many (>25%) positive cells. T-cell infiltration strongly correlates with the overall lymphocytic and leukocytic infiltration (14).

Preparation of thyroid-derived cells and cell lines

Thyroid-derived cells were prepared from five thyroids of patients with GD. Thyrocytes and lymphocytes were enriched after gradual enzymatic tissue digestion and cultured over a period of 16 h, as described (3). Thyrocytes were obtained from the adherent fraction by incubating the cell monolayer with PBS in the absence of Ca2+/Mg2+ for 45 min (16). Residual fibroblasts within the thyrocyte fraction were eliminated by incubating with the fibroblast-specific monoclonal antibody FibAS01 and goat-antimouse IgG-Dynabeads M450 (DynAl GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) (16). Thyroid-derived lymphocytes were enriched from the nonadherent fraction by Ficoll density gradient centrifugation (17). By culturing small pieces of thyroid tissue in DMEM (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) with 10% FCS, outgrowing fibroblasts were obtained, harvested, and used in the fifth to seventh passage. The purity of the isolated thyroid-derived cells was determined by using the indirect immunofluorescence technique on a FACS-Scan (Becton Dickinson and Co., Mountain View, CA) (3, 16). The human anaplastic thyroid carcinoma lines C 643, SW 1736, and HTh 74 were kindly provided by Dr. N.-E. Heldin (University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden). The original dedifferentiated papillary carcinoma line 8505 C and the follicular carcinoma line FTC-133 were purchased from the German Collection of Microorganisms and Animal Cell Cultures. All cell lines were cultured in DMEM/10% FCS.

In vitro cultures

Cells (1 x 105)/well were cultured on 24-well plates for 24 h. The medium was aspirated and replaced with 500 µL OPTI-MEM (Life Technologies) without FCS to eliminate possible stimulation by the latter. The medium contained the desired concentration of human interleukin (IL)-1{alpha} (10 U/mL; Sigma, Deisenhofen, Germany), tumor necrosis factor {alpha} (TNF-{alpha}) (5 ng/mL; Sigma), lipopolysaccharide Escherichia coli 055:B5 (LPS; 100 ng/mL; Sigma), or 10 ng/mL PMA (Sigma). For each stimulator, triplicate cultures were analyzed. The maximum or plateau of RANTES mRNA or protein expression was determined with HTh 74 cells taken as a standard. The RANTES mRNA level reached a plateau after about 12 h and was then analyzed. The highest RANTES protein levels were measured after 48 h. After this, the protein level decreased, probably because of proteolytic degradation (data not shown). In lymphocytes, the RANTES mRNA and protein levels were examined after 6 and 12 h, because without stimulation the cells died during this time and it was, therefore, impossible to measure the basal quantity any later. The supernatants were removed, frozen, and assayed for RANTES by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Freiburg, Germany). Lysis buffer (0.2 mL) from the QIAGEN total RNA isolation kit (QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany) was added to each well; the contents of three wells were then pooled for each cell type and frozen in liquid nitrogen for further mRNA analysis. The protein levels of cultures obtained from separate experiments were presented as mean ± SEM. The Mann-Whitney test was used to determine the statistically significant difference between basal and stimulated cells.

RNA isolation and complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis

Total cellular RNA was isolated from thyroid tissue and cell cultures with the QIAGEN total RNA isolation kit (QIAGEN), in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Genomic DNA was digested with 0.02 U DNase/µg RNA (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany) at 25 C for 10 min. Five micrograms of total RNA was taken to synthesize cDNA, using a first-strand cDNA synthesis kit from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech (Freiburg, Germany) in a reaction volume of 15 µL.

Semiquantitative competitive RT-PCR

Gylceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) cDNA was quantified in accordance with the published method (18). To quantify human RANTES cDNA, a rapid one-step method was introduced to synthesize an internal homologous competitor (19, 20). Amplification of thyroid tissue cDNA with the RANTES sense and RANTES hybrid primers (see Table 2) resulted in a 375-bp RANTES competitor. The competitor was purified from excess primers and dNTPs, using the QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (QIAGEN GmbH) and quantified. The competitors were stabilized at defined concentrations in the PCR tubes by the method of Köhler et al. (21).

Variations between different cDNA preparations were corrected. All the samples were first adjusted to contain equal concentrations of GAPDH cDNA in a semiquantitative RT-PCR (20). We then estimated RANTES cDNA in these adjusted samples. cDNA samples were titrated into RT-PCR amplification solutions containing known copies of the competitor. Both the sample cDNA and the competitor were coamplified, using the RANTES sense and RANTES antisense primers. Two products were generated. One was derived from the cDNA (477 bp) and the other, 102 bp smaller in size, from the RANTES competitor. The corresponding fragments for GAPDH PCR were 567 bp (sample cDNA) and 477 bp (competitor) in length. Based on the difference in length, the sample cDNA and competitor PCR products were resolved by gel electrophoresis. The sample cDNA and competitor were quantified by measuring the intensity of ethidium fluorescence with a cooled CCD 8-bit image sensor and the data analyzed by Phoretix 1 D plus software (Phoretix International, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK). The target copies equation was used to determine the ratio of sample cDNA copies/PCR to the number of competitor copies added, multiplied by the quotient of the cDNA signal and divided by the competitor signal. Each 25 µL amplification reaction contained 2.5 µL 10x concentrated PCR buffer (15 mM MgCl2), 0.3 U Taq DNA polymerase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany), 100 µM dNTPs, 0.1 µM of each primer, 1 µL sample cDNA, and the stabilized competitor in adjusted dilutions.

Intracellular RANTES staining

The method for intracellular staining was adapted from that of Sander et al. (22). Peripheral blood (2 x 106) or thyroid-derived lymphocytes from the same patient (n = 4) were incubated with 0.1 µg/mL lipopolysaccharide and 2 µmol/L monensin (Sigma) for 24 h. The cells were washed twice in PBS/1%FCS, then fixed with 0.5 mL ice-cold 4% parformaldehyde/PBS for 10 min. After washing, the cells were resuspended in PBS containing 0.3% saponin (Sigma). The cells were incubated for simultaneous surface and intracellular staining with CD8-FITC (PharMingen Deutschland GmbH, Hamburg, Germany), CD3-CyChrome, and RANTES-PE (R&D Systems GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany) for 30 min at 4 C. After washing, the cells were analyzed by flow cytometry.

Chemokine receptor analysis

CCR1, CCR3, CCR4, and CCR5 mRNA expression was analyzed for all thyroid-derived cell types and thyroid carcinoma cell lines by RT-PCR (primers see Table 1Go). mRNA from peripheral blood mononuclear cells that had been isolated by Ficoll density gradient centrifugation served as a positive control. To determine chemokine receptor protein expression, 2 x 105 cells were stained with directly fluorochrome-labeled monoclonal antibodies at the desired concentration for 20 min at 4 C (CCR5-phycoerythrin, CD3-CyChrome, PharMingen; CCR3- phycoerythrin, R&D Systems) or by means of an indirect immunofluorescence technique (CCR1, R&D Systems GmbH; CCR4, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA). The cells were analyzed by flow cytometry.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Primers and length of amplified templates for RT-PCR

 

    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
RANTES mRNA levels in thyroid tissues of patients with GD and TA

All the thyroid tissues investigated were RANTES mRNA positive (Fig. 1Go). In GD patients, the RANTES mRNA level correlated with the TPO antibodies (r = 0.76; P < 0.001) and T-cell infiltration (r = 0.68; P < 0.005). GD patients with high TPO antibodies showed a significantly higher RANTES mRNA level (10-21 mol RANTES cDNA/PCR; mean ± SEM, 349 ± 72) than patients with no or low anti-TPO antibodies (73 ± 17; P < 0.005). Among GD patients with high TPO antibodies, the two patients with the lowest RANTES mRNA levels showed the least amount of TPO antibodies and of T-cell infiltration. The RANTES mRNA level did not correlate with the TBII antibodies (r = 0.36). The RANTES mRNA levels of the two untreated GD patients, one with zero and one with high anti-TPO levels were 67.5 and 404 x 10 -21 mol RANTES cDNA/PCR, respectively.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. RANTES mRNA levels in the thyroid tissue of patients with GD showing none or low (<=200 U/mL) and high (>=4000 U/mL) levels of TPO antibodies in the serum and in autonomous nodules and the quiescent surrounding tissue of patients with TA.

 
In TA, RANTES mRNA levels did not correlate with T-cell infiltration. There was no difference in RANTES mRNA levels between 1) the autonomous nodules (108 ± 30) and the quiescent sourrounding tissue (130 ± 29) in TA patients and 2) the autonomous or quiescent tissues of TA patients and the tissues of patients with GD showing low T-cell infiltration. RANTES mRNA levels of both tissues of TA patients and tissues of GD patients with high anti-TPO levels and high T-cell infiltration differed significantly (P < 0.05).

RANTES mRNA and protein expression in thyroid-derived cells

To define the cellular source of RANTES mRNA, we investigated isolated thyroid-derived cell populations. Lymphocytes expressed a more than 300 higher basal RANTES mRNA level than fibroblasts, and secreted RANTES (mean ± SEM; n = 3; 140 ± 30 pg/ml) under basal conditions (Fig. 2Go). PMA (4490 ± 200 pg/mL) and LPS (480 ± 140 pg/mL) increased RANTES secretion significantly, whereas IL-1 or TNF-{alpha} did not. This result was confirmed by flow cytometry (data not shown). Unstimulated fibroblasts expressed RANTES mRNA near the detection limit and secreted only small amounts of protein (Fig. 3Go). Stimulation with both IL-1 and TNF-{alpha} induced RANTES secretion up to 5 ng/mL after 48 h. Thyrocytes produced small amounts of RANTES under basal conditions (Fig. 4Go), and showed a slight, insignificant increase after stimulation with IL-1 or TNF-{alpha} (n = 5; basal, 12 ± 4 pg/ml; IL-1, 18 ± 7 pg/mL; TNF-{alpha}, 22 ± 10 pg/mL).



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. RANTES mRNA (A) and protein expression (B) in stimulated cultures of thyroid-derived lymphocytes. A, Quantitative RANTES RT-PCR. Defined concentrations of the RANTES competitor were coamplified with identical GAPDH-adjusted sample cDNA aliquots in the same PCR tube. The sample cDNA and competitor PCR products were separated by gel electrophoresis. The target copies equation was used to determine the ratio of sample cDNA copies/PCR to the number of competitor copies added, multiplied by the quotient of the cDNA signal divided by the competitor signal. The original gel electrophoresis results are shown in the lower part of the figure. The concentration of the competitor is indicated above the gel electrophoresis. B, RANTES determined in cell culture supernatants by ELISA; *, P < 0.05, significant differences between basal and stimulated RANTES levels.

 


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. RANTES mRNA (A) and protein expression (B) in stimulated cultures of thyrocytes.

 


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. RANTES mRNA (A) and protein expression (B) in stimulated cultures of thyroid-derived fibroblasts.

 
The low basal levels could have been attributed to a small number of contaminating lymphocytes, but this possibility had been excluded by flow cytometry. Only treatment with PMA enhanced RANTES secretion up to 30-fold after 48 h (Fig. 2CGo), but this increase may have been related to the cytotoxic effects of PMA on thyrocytes, because the number of dead cells among the thyrocytes increased conspicuously during PMA treatment (data not shown).

RANTES mRNA and protein expression in thyroid tumor cell lines

To confirm that thyrocytes may actually express RANTES, we examined five thyroid carcinoma cell lines. All of them expressed RANTES mRNA and protein under basal conditions, although the levels varied considerably. Cell lines with high levels of basal RANTES mRNA showed higher basal RANTES protein expression than cell lines with low basal levels. Unstimulated FTC-133, 8505 C, and C643 cells secreted more than 500 pg/mL RANTES. The basal RANTES mRNA (1.2 x 10-19 RANTES cDNA/PCR) and protein expression (1400 ± 24 pg/mL) by C 643 cells may be of physiological relevance.

Although FTC-133, 8505C, and SW 1736 cells express IL-1 and TNF-{alpha} receptors (20) and respond to cytokine or PMA stimulation with an increase in granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor or matrix-metalloproteinase mRNA and protein expression (18, 20), there is no, or only a slight, up-regulation of RANTES after stimulation (data not shown). On the other hand, basal RANTES negative HTh 74 cells showed a strong induction of RANTES both in the mRNA and protein levels after PMA (1100 ± 46 pg/mL) and TNF-{alpha} (1000 ± 44 pg/mL) but not IL-1 treatment.

Intracellular staining of RANTES

Compared with peripheral blood lymphocytes, a 2- to 3-fold quantity of thyroid-derived CD3+ lymphocytes expressed RANTES in the same patient (n = 4; mean ± SEM; periphery: 12.9 ± 2.3%; thyroid: 35.0 ± 8.0%; P = 0.05). In the periphery (89.1 ± 3.0%) as well as in the thyroid (92.8 ± 1.0%), most of the RANTES+ cells were CD3+ lymphocytes. Among the RANTES+CD3+ lymphocytes, nearly half of the cells expressed the CD8 antigen (periphery, 41.6 ± 8.9%; thyroid, 54.1 ± 3.6%). Figure 5Go shows the typical staining pattern of one patient with GD. Thyrocytes as well a thyroid-derived fibroblasts did not show intracellular RANTES staining (data not shown).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Determination of RANTES+ and CD8+ peripheral blood (A) and thyroid-derived lymphocytes (B) from one typical patient with GD by means of intracellular and cell surface staining in flow cytometry with directly labeled monoclonal antibodies. The percentages of labeled cells within the CD3+ cells are shown.

 
RANTES chemokine receptor mRNA and protein expression

Mononuclear cells circulating in the peripheral blood and separated by density gradient centrifugation served as a positive control for the expression of chemokine receptors. Thyroid-derived lymphocytes and thyrocytes expressed all the chemokine receptor mRNAs investigated. The mRNA signals obtained from leukocytes were usually much stronger than those from thyrocytes. The cell lines, as well as the fibroblasts, were either negative or showed only very faint signals for CCR1, CCR5, and CCR4 mRNA. All cell types and cell lines were positive for CCR3 mRNA (Fig. 5Go).

These results correlate well with the data obtained by flow cytometry. A small number of CCR3+ cells (between 2% and 11%) were detected within each cell type analyzed. The CCR3 expression did not correlate with the degree of activation of the cells. The few CCR3+ and CCR5+ cells among the thyrocytes could not be characterized as remaining leukocytes (data not shown). RANTES chemokine receptor expression was further examined by double labeling with an anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody on lymphocytes in the peripheral blood and those derived from the thyroid of the same patient (n = 3, Fig. 7Go). The number of CCR3+ and CCR5+ T cells in the thyroid was significantly higher (CCR3+ within CD3+: 15 ± 7%; CCR5+ within CD3+: 44 ± 11%) than the number of mononuclear cells in the peripheral blood (CCR3+ within CD3+: 3 ± 1%; CCR5+ within CD3+: 19 ± 5%; P < 0.05).



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Determination of CCR3+ (A and B) and CCR5+ (C and D) T cells in peripheral blood (A and C) and thyroid-derived lymphocytes (B and D) from one typical patient with GD by means of flow cytometry with directly labeled monoclonal antibodies. The percentages of labeled cells within the CD3+ cells are shown.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Our data on patients with GD clearly demonstrate that thyroids with high lymphocytic infiltration show significantly higher RANTES mRNA levels than those with low infiltration. This finding reflects the maintenance of an immune response rather than its initiation, because most of the thyroid samples were obtained more than eight months after diagnosis. Two thyroid samples obtained immediately after diagnosis of GD showed RANTES mRNA levels in the same range as samples from antithyroid drug-treated patients. The RANTES mRNA level and the density of lymphocytic infiltration correlate with the levels of TPO, but not with those of TBII antibodies. This is in accordance with the literature. The intensity of the intrathyroidal immune process is better reflected by the levels of TPO than of the TBII antibodies (23). Our routine TBII assay did not allow us to distinguish between thyroid stimulating and blocking antibodies, which may correlate better with lymphocytic infiltration. Unlike us, Ashhab et al. (8) investigated GD patients with few or no anti-TPO antibodies. Because such patients show only a small amount of lymphocytic infiltration, these authors probably failed to recognize a significant difference between the RANTES mRNA levels in the tissues of patients with nonautoimmune multinodular goiter and those with GD. Our results from autonomous nodules and the quiescent surrounding tissue suggest that RANTES levels reflect immunological as opposed to functional differences in the thyroid. However, RANTES is not the only chemokine responsible for attracting lymphocytes into the thyroid, which is overexpressed in GD (8). There is a complex network involving the selective and coordinated production of individual chemokines and the expression of chemokine receptors capable of attracting selective leukocyte subpopulations into the thyroid. The maintenance of the lymphocytic infiltrate in GD tissue is not a static condition. Increasing variability of T-cell clones, significantly more activated T-cells (15, 24, 25) and interferon-{gamma} or TNF-{alpha} producing lymphocytes (16, 25) in the thyroid than in the peripheral blood of the same patient during the course of GD, even after long treatment, reflects long-standing active immunological processes in the thyroid.

Activated T cells are very potential for producing RANTES (12, 13). In our study, thyroid-derived lymphocytes showed the highest basal expression of RANTES mRNA. Intracellular staining of RANTES clearly demonstrates that thyroid-derived lymphocytes possessed a higher capacity to produce RANTES compared with peripheral blood lymphocytes of the same patient. It is not clear whether the high RANTES level is the reason for dense lymphocytic infiltration or whether the high RANTES level is caused by present lymphocytes that have received other specific chemokine signals inducing their migration into the thyroid. An autocrine feedback between recruited lymphocytes and RANTES production is also conceivable.

As the data have shown, RANTES expression is not limited to activated T cells (26). It is interesting that thyrocytes produce small amounts of RANTES under basal conditions, which suggests that one possible role of thyrocytes is to participate in the migration of T lymphocytes and monocytes into the thyroid from the blood stream. Although it is well known that in vitro thyrocytes produce a greater variety of cytokines than any other endocrine cells (27), only two chemokines, IL-8 and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, have been investigated (28, 29). Both have been found in untreated thyrocytes as has been shown here in the case of RANTES. Intracellular staining of RANTES could not been demonstrated, probably due to the limited sensitivity of the method compared with the ELISA system.

To confirm our observations on the expression of RANTES in thyrocytes, we examined five thyroid carcinoma cell lines. Four expressed higher basal RANTES levels than thyrocytes. The basal or inducible RANTES expression of all investigated tumor cell lines indicate that thyrocytes can acquire this capability after malignant transformation. As has already been demonstrated, cell lines from the same tissue often produce higher RANTES levels than the normal unstimulated cells (30). Physiologically relevant levels of intrinsic RANTES production have been shown in the tumor cell lines from two breast carcinomas and four of eight melanomas (30, 31). It is of particular interest that RANTES production by tumor cells seems to be a mediator for the recruitment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and macrophages as inhibitors of tumor growth (31, 32). RANTES may augment the host response to tumors. On the other hand, more malignant cells expressed higher RANTES levels than did the less malignant cells (30, 33). Transplantation experiments in nude mice suggest that effects of RANTES may also benefit tumor progression. This is why data on RANTES expression by thyroid cell lines can only be assessed in thyroid tumors. Finally, fibroblasts may be potential RANTES producers (34). In our study, IL-1 and TNF-{alpha} induced strong RANTES secretion by basal negative thyroid-derived fibroblasts.

To determine RANTES binding to thyroid-derived cells, we identified their expression of the chemokine receptors CCR1, CCR3, CCR4, and CCR5. All of these receptors can bind more chemokines than RANTES alone (6). Although the complex interactions between the different ligands and receptors in vivo cannot be detected by our current assays, the detection of RANTES binding receptors on thyroid-derived cells provides a first insight into the possible regulatory mechanisms. Thyroid-derived lymphocytes were positive for all the chemokine receptor mRNAs analyzed. CCR3 and CCR5 are both expressed to a greater extent by thyroid-derived T cells than by T cells in the peripheral blood of the same patient. The very small number of CCR3+ and CCR5+ T cells in the peripheral blood confirms the data reported by other groups (35). Because CCR3 expression identifies T cells capable of producing IL-4 (the key feature of Th2 cells), and CCR5 expression reflects the T-cell activation state, the more pronounced expression of CCR3 and CCR5 on thyroid-derived T cells may reflect the autoimmune process within the thyroid. Furthermore, flow cytometry analysis showed that a few cells among the thyrocytes also expressed CCR3 and CCR5, which could not be observed to contain lymphocytes. Chemokine receptor mRNAs have recently been identified on intestinal epithelial cells (36). These data indicate that epithelial cells may be able to serve as targets for chemokine signaling.

In summary, we found a clear correlation between the intensity of lymphocytic infiltration and the RANTES mRNA levels in the thyroid tissue of patients with GD. Lymphocytes themselves are the main source of RANTES in the thyroid. RANTES may use CCR3 and CCR5 to bring about the autocrine or paracrine stimulation of lymphocytes. The low RANTES levels in thyrocytes may be a feature of normal thyroid physiology. On the other hand, the high level of basal RANTES expression in some of the thyroid carcinoma lines analyzed here suggests that RANTES plays a part in thyroid tumors.



View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Chemokine receptor mRNA expression in thyroid-derived cell types and carcinoma cell lines determined by RT-PCR. Mononuclear cells from the peripheral blood served as a positive control.

 

    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Mrs. S. Kiessling for technical assistance and Prof. K. Spanel-Borowski for expert advice.


    Footnotes
 
1 Financially supported by the Interdisciplinary Center of Clinical Research (IZKF, project B6), University of Leipzig. Back

Received February 25, 2000.

Revised August 2, 2000.

Accepted September 7, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. McLachlan SM, Dickinson AM, Malcolm A, et al. 1983 Thyroid autoantibody synthesis by cultures of thyroid and peripheral blood lymphocytes. I. Lymphocyte markers and response to pokeweed mitogen. Clin Exp Immunol. 52:45–53.[Medline]
  2. Misaki T, Konishi J, Nakashima T, et al. 1985 Immunohistological phenotyping of thyroid infiltrating lymphocytes in Graves’ disease and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. Clin Exp Immunol. 60:104–110.[Medline]
  3. Aust G, Lehmann I, Heberling H-J. 1996 Different immunophenotype and autoantibody production by peripheral blood and thyroid-derived lymphocytes in patients with Graves’ disease. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 104:52–60.
  4. Luster AD. 1998 Chemokines—chemotactic cytokines that mediate inflammation. N Engl J Med. 338:436–445.[Free Full Text]
  5. Premack BA, Schall TJ. 1996 Chemokine receptors: gateways to inflammation and infection. Nat Med. 2:1174–1178.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Mantovani A. 1999 The chemokine system: redundancy for robust outputs. Immunol Today. 20:254–257.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Schall TJ, Bacon K, Toy KJ, Goeddel DV. 1990 Selective attraction of monocytes and T lymphocytes of the memory phenotype by cytokine RANTES. Nature. 347:669–671.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Ashhab Y, Dominguez O, Sospedra M, Roura-Mir C, Lucas-Martin A, Pujol-Borrell R. 1999 A one-tube polymerase chain reaction protocol demonstrates CC chemokine overexpression in Graves’ disease glands. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 84:2873–2882.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Schatz H, Kühn A, Zimmermann U. 1984 Thyroglobulin and microsomal antibodies in patients with and without thyroid disorders. In: Schatz H, Doniach D, eds. Autoimmunity in thyroid disorders. Stuttgart, New York: Georg Thieme Verlag; 188–210.
  10. Engler H, Riesen WF, Keller B. 1992 Diagnostic value of autoantibodies against microsomal thyroid peroxidase (anti-TPO). Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 122:1976–1980.[Medline]
  11. Hamada N, Ito K, Mimura T, et al. 1987 Retrospective reevaluation of the significance of thyroid microsomal antibody in the treatment of Graves’ disease. Acta Endocrinol Copenh. 114:328–335.[Medline]
  12. Heeger P, Wolf G, Meyers C, et al. 1992 Isolation and characterization of cDNA from renal tubular epithelium encoding murine Rantes. Kidney Int. 41:220–225.[Medline]
  13. Marfaing-Koka A, Devergne O, Gorgone G, et al. 1995 Regulation of the production of the RANTES chemokine by endothelial cells. Synergistic induction by IFN-{gamma} plus TNF-{alpha} and inhibition by IL-4 and IL-13. J Immunol. 154:1870–1878.[Abstract]
  14. Heuer M, Aust G, Ode-Hakim S, Scherbaum WA. 1996 Different cytokine mRNA profiles in Graves’ disease, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis and non-autoimmune thyroid disorders determined by quantitative reverse transcriptase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Thyroid. 6:97–106.[Medline]
  15. Cohen SB, Weetman AP. 1988 Activated interstitial and intraepithelial thyroid lymphocytes in autoimmune thyroid disease. Acta Endocrinol. 119:161–169.
  16. Aust G, Heuer M, Laue S, et al. 1996 Expression of TNF-{alpha} mRNA and protein in pathological thyroid tissue and carcinoma cell lines. Clin Exp Immunol. 105:148–154.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Davies TF. 1985 Co-cultures of human thyroid monolayer cultures of human thyroid monolayer cells and autologous T cells—impact of HLA class II antigen expression. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 61:418–423.[Abstract]
  18. Aust G, Hofmann A, Laue S, Ode-Hakim S, Scherbaum WA. 1996 Differential regulation of GM-CSF mRNA and protein expression in human thyrocytes and thyroid-derived fibroblasts by Il-1{alpha} and TNF-{alpha}. J Endocrinol. 151:277–285.[Abstract]
  19. Celi FS, Zenilman ME, Shuldiner AR. 1993 A rapid and versatile method to synthesize internal standards for competitive PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 21:1047–1047.[Free Full Text]
  20. Aust G, Hofmann A, Laue S, Rost A, Köhler T, Scherbaum WA. 1997 Human thyroid carcinoma cell lines and normal thyrocytes: expression and regulation of MMP-1 and TIMP-1 mRNA and protein. Thyroid. 7:713–724.[Medline]
  21. Köhler T, Rost AK, Remke H. 1997 Calibration and storage of DNA competitors used for contamination-protected competitive PCR. Biotechniques. 23:722–726.[Medline]
  22. Sander B, Andersson J, Andersson U. 1991 Assessment of cytokines by immunofluorescence and the paraformaldehyde-saponin procedure. Immunol Rev. 119:65–93.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Paschke R, Vogg M, Swillens S, Usadel KH. 1993 Correlation of microsomal antibodies with the intensity of the intrathyroidal autoimmune process in Graves’ disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 77:939–943.[Abstract]
  24. Margolick JB, Weetman AP, Burman KD. 1988 Immunohistochemical analysis of intrathyroidal lymphocytes in Graves’ disease: evidence of activated T cells and production of interferon-gamma. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 47:208–218.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Aust G, Lehmann I, Laue S, Scherbaum WA. 1996 Activated and IFN-{gamma} producing thyroid-derived T cells are detected in Graves’ disease, thyroid autonomy as well as in non-toxic multinodular goiter. Eur J Endocrinol. 135:60–68.[Abstract]
  26. Nelson PJ, Kim HT, Manning WC, Goralski TJ, Krensky AM. 1993 Genomic organization and transcriptional regulation of the RANTES chemokine gene. J Immunol. 151:2601–2612.[Abstract]
  27. Aust G, Scherbaum WA. 1996 Expression of cytokines in the thyroid: thyrocytes as potential cytokine producers. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 104:64–67.
  28. Weetman AP, Bennett GL, Wong WL. 1992 Thyroid follicular cells produce interleukin-8. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 75:328–330.[Abstract]
  29. Kasai K, Banba N, Motohashi S, Hattori Y, Manaka K, Shimoda SI. 1996 Expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 mRNA and protein in cultured human thyrocytes. FEBS Lett. 394:137–140.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Luboshits G, Shina S, Kaplan O, et al. 1999 Elevated expression of the CC chemokine regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES) in advanced breast carcinoma. Cancer Res. 59:4681–4687.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Mrowietz U, Schwenk U, Maune S, et al. 1999 The chemokine RANTES is secreted by human melanoma cells and is associated with enhanced tumour formation in nude mice. Br J Cancer. 79:1025–1031.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Yoong KF, Afford SC, Jones R, et al. 1999 Expression and function of CXC and CC chemokines in human malignant liver tumors: a role for human monokine induced by gamma-interferon in lymphocyte recruitment to hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 30:100–111.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. von Luettichau I, Nelson PJ, Pattison JM, et al. 1996 RANTES chemokine expression in diseased and normal human tissues. Cytokine. 8:89–98.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Teran LM, Mochizuki M, Bartels J, et al. 1999 Th1- and Th2-type cytokines regulate the expression and production of eotaxin and RANTES by human lung fibroblasts. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 20:777–786.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Sallusto F, Palermo B, Hoy A, Lanzavecchia A. 1999 The role of chemokine receptors in directing traffic of naive, type 1 and type 2 T cells. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 246:123–128.[Medline]
  36. Dwinell MB, Eckmann L, Leopard JD, Varki NM, Kagnoff MF. 1999 Chemokine receptor expression by human intestinal epithelial cells. Gastroenterology. 117:359–367.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
H. Okamoto and N. Kamatani
A CCR-5 antagonist inhibits the development of adjuvant arthritis in rats
Rheumatology, February 1, 2006; 45(2): 230 - 232.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. P. Martin, E. C. Coronel, G.-i. Sano, S.-C. Chen, G. Vassileva, C. Canasto-Chibuque, J. D. Sedgwick, P. S. Frenette, M. Lipp, G. C. Furtado, et al.
A Novel Model for Lymphocytic Infiltration of the Thyroid Gland Generated by Transgenic Expression of the CC Chemokine CCL21
J. Immunol., October 15, 2004; 173(8): 4791 - 4798.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
B. S. Prabhakar, R. S. Bahn, and T. J. Smith
Current Perspective on the Pathogenesis of Graves' Disease and Ophthalmopathy
Endocr. Rev., December 1, 2003; 24(6): 802 - 835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. Pritchard, R. Han, N. Horst, W. W. Cruikshank, and T. J. Smith
Immunoglobulin Activation of T Cell Chemoattractant Expression in Fibroblasts from Patients with Graves' Disease Is Mediated Through the Insulin-Like Growth Factor I Receptor Pathway
J. Immunol., June 15, 2003; 170(12): 6348 - 6354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
P. Romagnani, M. Rotondi, E. Lazzeri, L. Lasagni, M. Francalanci, A. Buonamano, S. Milani, P. Vitti, L. Chiovato, M. Tonacchera, et al.
Expression of IP-10/CXCL10 and MIG/CXCL9 in the Thyroid and Increased Levels of IP-10/CXCL10 in the Serum of Patients with Recent-Onset Graves' Disease
Am. J. Pathol., July 1, 2002; 161(1): 195 - 206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. Pritchard, N. Horst, W. Cruikshank, and T. J. Smith
Igs from Patients with Graves' Disease Induce the Expression of T Cell Chemoattractants in Their Fibroblasts
J. Immunol., January 15, 2002; 168(2): 942 - 950.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simchen, C.
Right arrow Articles by Aust, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Simchen, C.
Right arrow Articles by Aust, G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals