help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yang, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Akoum, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yang, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Akoum, A.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 85, No. 12 4721-4727
Copyright © 2000 by The Endocrine Society


Original Studies

Identification of Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor as a Potent Endothelial Cell Growth-Promoting Agent Released by Ectopic Human Endometrial Cells1

Yingbo Yang2, Pierre Degranpré, Abdelaziz Kharfi and Ali Akoum3

Laboratoire d’Endocrinologie de la Reproduction, Centre de Recherche, Pavillon Saint-François d’Assise, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, Canada G1L 3L5

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Ali Akoum, Laboratoire d’Endocrinologie de la Reproduction, Centre de Recherche, Hôpital Saint-François d’Assise, 10 rue de l’Espinay, Local D0–711, Québec, Canada G1L 3L5. E-mail: ali.akoum{at}crsfa.ulaval.ca


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The growth of endometrial cells in ectopic locations (endometriosis) is dependent on the establishment of an adequate blood supply. Neovascularization (angiogenesis) is therefore a vital step toward the progression of this disease. We first revealed the presence of a potent mitogenic activity for human endothelial cells in the culture medium of immortalized human endometriotic cells. The activity, measured by the level of [3H]-thymidine incorporation into the DNA of human coronary artery endothelial cells, was then purified by anion exchange high-performance liquid chromatography. Electrophoretic analysis of one of the bioactive fractions that markedly enhanced endothelial cell proliferation showed three distinct bands with apparent molecular masses of 15.8, 12.6, and 6.5 kDa. N-terminal microsequencing of an internal peptide from the 12.6-kDa protein showed 100% homology with human macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF). The protein was positively identified as MIF by Western blot analysis using a specific anti-MIF antibody. Anti-MIF antibody inhibited the bioactivity found in the evaluated fraction and the conditioned medium of primary endometriotic cell cultures, and commercial recombinant human MIF displayed a high mitogenic activity for endothelial cells. Our findings reveal that MIF is released by endometriotic cells and acts as a potent mitogenic factor for human endothelial cells in vitro. This may have a considerable interest, in view of the crucial role of angiogenesis in ectopic endometrial cell growth and activity and in numerous tissues undergoing dynamic physiological changes, such as human endometrium.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ENDOMETRIOSIS IS ONE of the most common gynecological diseases, and it affects about 10% of women of reproductive age (1). The cause(s) of endometriosis remains obscure, but it is thought to arise from the implantation and growth of exfoliated menstrual endometrium outside the uterus, mainly in the peritoneal cavity (2). According to this widely accepted hypothesis, the survival and growth of the ectopically implanted endometrial tissue requires a de novo blood supply and dynamic vascular remodeling, both essential to the development of endometriosis. Angiogenesis, the process by which new blood vessels develop, is currently the focus of mounting interest (3). Angiogenesis is critical to normal reproductive function; tightly regulated angiogenesis occurs during follicular maturation, endometrial growth, and menstruation and during placentation and embryonic development (4, 5). Angiogenesis is also implicated in neoplastic (6, 7) and nonneoplastic diseases such as arthritis (8) and arteriosclerosis (9).

In the course of the normal menstrual cycle, the endometrium undergoes profuse increases in the length, branching, and coiling of spiral arteries (10). However, more aggressive angiogenesis may occur in the peritoneal cavity of women with endometriosis (11); the establishment of the explant not only depends on the maintenance of the blood vessels within the ectopic endometrium but also on the growth of new blood vessels, through the peritoneum, to sustain the foreign endometrium (12). Active endometriotic explants have pronounced vascularization both within and around the tissue (13).

Several angiogenic factors have been identified, including acidic and basic fibroblast growth factors, platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor, and vascular endothelial cell growth factor (VEGF) (14, 15, 16). The identification of the mediators of angiogenesis involved in endometriosis and their origins will be instrumental to elucidating the pathogenesis of the disease. In the peritoneal fluid, which bathes the peritoneal and ovarian surface where most endometriotic lesions occur, an elevated angiogenic activity was found in women with endometriosis, compared with normal women (17). Higher peritoneal concentrations of VEGF were also demonstrated in women with moderate to severe endometriosis than in women without the disease (18, 19). Peritoneal and resident macrophages found in endometriotic lesions seemed to be the major sources of VEGF secretion (19). However, we also believe that endometrial cells capable of aberrant implantation and growth in ectopic locations produce angiogenic factors that ensure their survival and development. In the present study, we show that immortalized endometriotic epithelial cells produce factors that promote human endothelial cell proliferation, and reveal a similar activity in the culture medium of primary endometriotic cell cultures. Of the mitogenic fractions isolated from the conditioned medium of the endometriotic cell line, one contained macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), which displayed a potent mitogenic activity for endothelial cells and seemed to be a major mediator of the mitogenic activity released by immortalized and primary endometriotic cells.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Source and handling of tissue

Endometriotic biopsies were collected, at laparoscopy, from three women who had given an informed consent for a research protocol approved by the Saint-François d’Assise Hospital Ethics Committee on Human Research. These women were between 32 and 39 yr old, consulted for infertility and/or pelvic pain, had no endometrial hyperplasia or neoplasia, and had not received any antiinflammatory or hormonal medication during a period of at least 3 months before surgery. One woman had revised American Fertility Society stage I endometriosis, and two had stage II. Endometriotic biopsies were from brownish lesions and peritoneal red vesicles. As soon as they were collected, the biopsies were placed, at 4 C, in sterile HBSS containing 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin, and 0.25 µg/mL amphotericin and were transported to the laboratory. The biopsy specimens were examined histologically, and the diagnosis of endometriosis was confirmed, in all cases, by the identification of both glandular and stromal endometrial elements.

Culture of primary and immortalized endometriotic cells

Endometriotic tissue was immediately minced into small pieces and dissociated with collagenase, as previously described (see 35). Cells were pelleted by centrifugation (200 x g/10 min); resuspended in DMEM-F12 containing 10 µg/mL insulin, 5 µg/mL transferrin, 10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin, and 2.5 µg/mL Amphotericin B (Life Technologies, Inc., Burlington, Ontario, Canada); and plated in 100-mm-diameter culture dishes; then grown, at 37 C, in 5% carbon dioxide. Both tadpole-shaped epithelial and fibroblast-like stromal cells were present in culture, as identified morphologically by light microscopy and immunocytochemically with specific monoclonal antibodies to cytokeratins and vimentin, as previously described (see 35). No leukocytes were detected in the endometriotic cells detached from culture dishes and assessed by flow cytometry (data not shown).

Endometriotic cell line Clo03 (20) was cultured in 100-mm-diameter culture dishes and maintained at 37 C, 5% CO2 in the same culture medium described above.

Preparation of conditioned media from endometriotic cell cultures

At confluence, cells were rinsed four times with HEPES buffered saline to eliminate FBS, then incubated for 24 h with M199 medium (Life Technologies, Inc.) (6 mL/Petri dish). The conditioned medium from primary endometriotic cell cultures (PCM) or from endometriotic cell line culture (LCM) was collected afterwards on ice, centrifuged to eliminate cell debris, concentrated and diafiltrated using Amicon’s YM1 membranes (Millipore Corp., Nepean, ON, Canada), aliquoted, and stored at -70 C until biological assay or further purification. The protein content of the samples was measured by Micro BCA Protein Assay Reagent Kit (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL) and analyzed by SDS-PAGE in an electrophoresis system (Mini-Protean II, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Ltd, Mississauga, ON, Canada), according to Laemmli et al. (21). Bands were visualized by silver staining.

Purification of angiogenic factors from LCM

The chromatographic system consisted of two 2150 pumps, a gradient controller, and a 2221 integrator (Pharmacia Biotech, Baie d’Urfé, PQ, Canada). A Mono Q HR 5/5 anion exchange column (Pharmacia) was used for high-resolution separation of proteins. Two mg of LCM in 500 µL of 20-mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) were loaded using a 2154 high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) injection valve with 500-µL loop at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. Column eluates were monitored by ultraviolet absorbance, at 216 nm, using a 2158 Uvicord SD detector. Eight fractions, eluted by a sodium chloride (NaCl) step-wise gradient (0, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, and 1 M NaCl), were collected separately, concentrated with Amicon’s YM1 membranes (Millipore Corp.), aliquoted, and saved at -70 C until being analyzed by SDS-PAGE and tested for mitogenic activity.

One of the fractions exerting a significant mitogenic action on human endothelial cells (F1, obtained with 0 M NaCl) was selected for further analyses, because it exhibited the lowest number of bands by electrophoresis. F1 was fractionated, using a Microcon-10 microconcentrator (Millipore Corp.), and both the lower part (F1a) and the upper part (F1b) were collected, aliquoted, and saved at -70 C until assay.

Analysis of cell proliferation

Endothelial cells from human coronary arteries (HCAEC, Cell Systems, Kirkland, WA) were cultured according to the supplier’s specifications. Briefly, cells were seeded in 24-well culture plates (4 x 104 cells/well) precoated with attachment factor and feeded with CS-C complete serum-free medium (Cell Systems). The medium was refreshed every 24 h; at 60–70% confluence, cells were rinsed twice with HEPES buffered saline/Ca/Mg and incubated with CS-C mitogen-free medium (Cell Systems) for 24 h at 37 C, 5% CO2. Cells were then exposed, in fresh CS-C mitogen-free medium, to different concentrations of the evaluated substances, or to 10 µg/mL of endothelial cell growth supplement (ECGS) (Cell Systems), which was included as positive control in each experiment. For neutralization experiments, bioactive fractions were incubated, for 1 h at 37 C, with different concentrations of polyclonal goat anti-MIF antibody (10–1000 ng/mL) (R and D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) or with equivalent concentrations of normal goat IgGs (R and D Systems) before being added to endothelial cell cultures. Twelve hours later, 2.5 µCi [3H]-thymidine (SA, 20 Ci/mmol; NEN Life Science Products, Boston, MA) were added to each well, and incubation was continued for 12 h more. The media were then discarded; and cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS, fixed for 20 min in cold methanol, treated for 30 min at 4 C with 10% trichloroacetic acid, rinsed with cold ethanol, air dried, and dissolved in 0.5 mL of 0.6-N sodium hydroxide. After neutralization with 0.5 mL of 0.6-N chlorhydric acid (HCl), the radioactivity was measured by liquid scintillation spectrometry. Mitogenic activity was expressed as [3H]-thymidine incorporation percentage of control (medium without mitogens).

Amino acid sequence analysis

After purification by HPLC and a Microcon-10 microconcentrator, 20 µg of the bioactive fraction (F1a) were separated by SDS-PAGE as follows: Aliquots were heated to 37 C for 15 min before loading, and 100 mM sodium triglycolate (ICN Biomedicals, Inc., Aurora, OH) was added to the upper reservoir to prevent N-terminal blocking during electrophoresis (22). Proteins were visualized by Coomassie blue R-250 (0.1% solution in 50% methanol), individual bands were cut, and in-gel enzymatic digestion was carried out, for 24 h at 37 C, according to Williams et al. (23) using lysylendopeptidase (Wako Pure Chemical Industries Ltd., Richmond, VA). The resulting peptides were fractionated on a 1090 HPLC system (Hewlett-Packard Co., Palo Alto, CA) using a 1 mm x 25 cm C-18 reverse-phase column (5 µm, 300 pore size) (Vydac, Hesperia, CA) equilibrated with 98% buffer A [trifluoroacetic acid 0.1%] and 2% buffer B (80% acetonitrile, 0.08% trifluoroacetic acid). Peptides were eluted, at 50 µL/min, with a linear gradient of buffer B and were detected by ultraviolet absorbance at 216 mm. Selected peptides were then subjected to N-terminal sequencing by automatic Edman degradation performed on a model 473A pulsed liquid protein sequencer (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Analysis was performed by the Eastern Quebec Proteomics Core Facility (CHUQ, Sainte-Foy, PQ, Canada).

Western blot analysis

Proteins in the F1a fraction (1 µg) and PCM (1 and 10 µg) were separated under reducing conditions in 15% SDS-PAGE, as mentioned earlier, and transferred, during 2 h at 4 C and 250 mA, onto a 0.22-µm nitrocellulose membrane using electrophoretic transfer cell (Trans-Blot, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). The nitrocellulose membrane was then incubated, for 4 h at room temperature, in a solution containing 5% skimmed milk in 0.1 M Tris buffer, 0.9% NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20, pH 7.2 (TBST blocking solution) and 3% normal rabbit serum. The membrane was then cut into strips and incubated with an affinity-purified polyclonal goat anti-MIF antibody (2 µg/mL in TBST blocking solution) (R and D Systems) or with normal goat immunoglobulins (IgGs) (R and D Systems) at equivalent concentration, overnight at 4 C. Thereafter, the strips were incubated, for 1 h at room temperature, with peroxidase-labeled rabbit antigoat IgG antibodies (Fc specific) diluted 1:10,000 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), washed, and incubated with chemiluminescence (ECL) reagent (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Oakville, Ontario, Canada) for 1 min, air dried, wrapped in a plastic bag, and exposed to X-OMAT AR film (Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY) for 15 sec.

Statistical analysis

Values represent the mean of triplicate measurements. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. A post hoc Tukey’s test was used for multiple comparisons. Differences were considered statistically significant for P values < 0.05.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Detection and purification of mitogenic activity

The conditioned medium derived from Clo03 cell line, concentrated by Amicon’s YM1 membranes, stimulated the incorporation of [3H]-thymidine into the DNA of HCAEC in a dose-dependent manner. Figure 1Go illustrates results from three independent experiments showing that the level of [3H]-thymidine incorporation in cells incubated with 1, 10, and 100 ng/mL LCM increased by 151.1 ± 27.6% (P < 0.05), 190.6 ± 27.5% (P < 0.05), and 216.7 ± 35.4% (P < 0.05) of control, respectively. In each experiment, endothelial cell responsiveness to mitogens was evaluated by including ECGS as positive control, which (as shown in Fig. 1Go) increased the level of [3H]-thymidine incorporation by 290.0 ± 46.0% of control (P < 0.001).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Mitogenic activity of endometriotic cell line conditioned medium (LCM). HCAEC were exposed, for 12 h in serum-free medium, to different concentrations of LCM (1, 10, and 100 ng/mL) or to 10 µg/mL ECGS taken as positive control (PC), before [3H]-thymidine being added for an additional 12 h. Mitogenic activity was expressed as percentage of control (medium without mitogens) of [3H]-thymidine incorporation into the DNA of cells. Values are means ± SEM of triplicate determinations in three independent experiments. * and **, Significantly different from control (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively), by ANOVA and post hoc Tukey’s multiple-comparison test.

 
The conditioned medium was further fractionated by HPLC using ion-exchange chromatography and a step-wise 0–1-M NaCl gradient. Eight fractions eluted with 0, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, and 1 M NaCl were collected separately and evaluated for the presence of endothelial cell growth-promoting activity. The activity was mainly recovered in fractions 1, 2, and 8, which were eluted with 0, 0.3, and 1 M NaCl, respectively (data not shown).

In the present work, only F1 was considered for further investigations because electrophoretic analysis of this fraction showed it contained fewer bands than both the initial material (LCM) (Fig. 2Go) and the two other bioactive fractions F2 and F8 (data not shown).



View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. SDS-PAGE analysis of LCM (lane B), F1 (lane D), and F1a (lane E) obtained from F1 by ultrafiltration using a Microcon-10 microconcentrator. LCM (2.2 µg) was loaded in 10% acrylamide gel, whereas F1 (1 µg) and F1a (1.5 µg) were loaded in 15% acrylamide gel, and proteins were revealed by silver staining. Lanes A and B represent broad-range and low-range molecular mass markers, respectively.

 
Because our attempts to isolate the mitogenic factor(s) from F1 using chromatographic procedures were unsuccessful, we decided to separate low- and high-molecular-weight molecules of the fraction by ultrafiltration using Amicon’s ultrafiltration membranes. Using a Microcon-10 microconcentrator, three proteins [with estimated molecular masses of 15.8, 12.6, and 6.5 kDa (Fig. 2Go)] were isolated from F1 and recovered in the pass-through fraction (F1a). The biological assay of F1a revealed potent mitogenic activity toward endothelial cells. Such activity, expressed as [3H]-thymidine incorporation percentage of control, was significant at as low as 1 pg/mL (133.7 ± 5.8%; P < 0.05), increased as a function of F1a concentration in culture [reaching a maximal level at 0.1 ng/mL (177.3 ± 15.0%; P < 0.01)[, and gradually decreased afterwards at higher concentrations: 1 ng/mL (163.5 ± 10.7; P < 0.05) and 10 ng/mL (153.8 ± 9.0%; P < 0.05).

Identification and evaluation of MIF mitogenic activity

The in-gel lysylendopeptidase digestion of the 12.6-kDa band of F1a, followed by HPLC purification and N-terminal sequencing of 11 aminoacids from an internal 1.18-kDa peptide, revealed 100% identity with the human MIF (hMIF). As shown in Fig. 3AGo, the 11-aminoacids sequence perfectly matched that between amino acids 68 and 78 of hMIF, whose reported molecular mass (12.476 kDa) is very close to that of the 12.6-kDa protein. Moreover, the 12.6-kDa band was specifically recognized by an affinity-purified polyclonal goat anti-hMIF antibody, as shown by Western blot analysis of F1a fraction and PCM (Fig. 3BGo). This provides strong evidence for the identification of this protein as human MIF and demonstrates its secretion by primary ectopic endometrial cell cultures.



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. A, Sequence of the first 11 amino acid residues of an internal peptide obtained by {square}in-gel{square} lysylendopeptidase digestion of the 12.6-kDa band of F1a, revealing 100% identity with the 68th–78th amino acid sequence of hMIF; B, Western blot analysis of recombinant hMIF taken as positive control (lane 1), F1a fraction (lanes 2, 3, and 4), and PCM (lanes 5, 6, and 7). Note the positive immunoreaction of recombinant MIF and the 12.5-kDa band of F1a and PCM with polyclonal goat anti-MIF antibody (lanes 1, 2, 5, and 6) and the absence of immunoactivity with normal goat IgGs (negative control) (lanes 3, 4, and 7).

 
To determine whether MIF had any inherent mitogenic activity toward endothelial cells, the bioactive fraction F1a was incubated with different concentrations of the anti-MIF antibody (1–50 µg/mL) or with equivalent concentrations of nonspecific goat IgGs before being added to endothelial cell cultures. As shown in Fig. 4Go, the endothelial cell growth-promoting activity of F1a was significantly inhibited by the antibody (P < 0.01), whereas nonspecific goat IgGs had no significant effect. Recombinant MIF was then assessed for its ability to promote endothelial cell proliferation, and (as illustrated in Fig. 5Go) the protein displayed dose-dependent mitogenic action on HCAEC. This effect was statistically significant at 0.1 pg/mL (164 ± 15% of control, P < 0.05) and reached its highest level at 100 pg/mL (266 ± 23% of control, P < 0.01).



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Mitogenic activity of 10 µg/mL ECGS (PC) and of 100 pg/mL F1a, which was incubated or not with different concentrations of an affinity-purified polyclonal goat anti-MIF antibody (1–50 µg/mL) or with equivalent concentrations of nonspecific goat IgGs, for 1 h at room temperature, before being added to endothelial cell cultures. The mitogenic activity was determined as described under Fig. 1Go. Values are means ± SEM of triplicate determinations. **, Significant inhibition of F1a mitogenic activity (P < 0.01).

 


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Mitogenic activity of 10 µg/mL ECGS (PC) and different concentrations of MIF (10-4–10 ng/mL). The mitogenic activity was determined as described under Fig. 1Go. Values are means ± SEM of triplicate determinations in three independent experiments. * and **, Significantly different from control (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively).

 
Detection of MIF-related mitogenic activity in primary endometriotic cell culture medium

We finally assessed whether primary endometriotic cell cultures release any mitogenic activity for endothelial cells and found that PCM increased 3H-thymidine incorporation in HCAEC in a dose-dependent manner. The activity was significantly reduced (34 ± 5%, P < 0.05) after preincubation of PCM with anti-MIF antibody (Fig. 6Go).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Mitogenic activity of primary endometriotic cell culture conditioned medium (PCM). Conditioned media of cultures issued from three different biopsies were processed separately, and each medium was evaluated twice in duplicate. A, HCAEC were incubated with different concentrations of PCM, or with 10 µg/mL ECGS (PC), and the mitogenic activity was determined as described under Fig. 1Go. Results are expressed as means ± SEM. * and **, Significantly different from control (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively). B, The mitogenic activity of 100 ng/mL PCM was evaluated with and without prior incubation with polyclonal goat anti-MIF (1 µg/mL) or normal goat IgGs (1 µg/mL). Values are means ± SEM. *, Significantly different from PCM alone () (P < 0.05).

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In the present study, we have shown that immortalized human endometriotic cells liberate a potent mitogenic activity for human endothelial cells. Partial purification of the mitogenic factor(s) by anion-exchange chromatography led to the isolation of 3 main bioactive fractions. Further separation by ultrafiltration of one of these fractions resulted in the isolation of 3 proteins of low apparent molecular mass (15.8, 12.6, and 6.5 kDa), which, together, possessed potent endothelial cell growth promoting activity. N-terminal sequencing of an internal peptide obtained from one of these proteins proved it to be 100% homologous to 11 consecutive amino acids of human MIF; and Western blot analysis, using a specific antibody, confirmed the presence of MIF in the fraction.

Antibodies specific to MIF significantly reduced the mitogenic activity displayed by the F1a fraction and that detected in the culture medium of primary endometriotic cells. Recombinant hMIF (over 97% pure, according to the manufacturer) was intrinsically able to promote endothelial cell proliferation (this in a dose-dependent fashion and detectable at as low as 0.1 pg/mL). These findings reveal that MIF is released by endometriotic cells and acts as a potent mediator of the mitogenic activity for human endothelial cells in vitro. This may have a considerable interest, in view of the key role of angiogenesis in the ectopic growth of endometrial cells and the activity of the implants. Interestingly, the present findings coincide with the recent publication of data showing an important role for MIF in tumor growth-associated angiogenesis in vivo, and in vitro in autocrine regulation of microvascular endothelial cell proliferation (24). This is in keeping with our data, and it further supports the novel role of MIF.

MIF was one of the first reported cytokines. It was originally described as a lymphokine that retained macrophages and inhibited their migration from inflammatory loci (25, 26, 27), and extensive study of its biological functions has been made possible by the recent cloning of mouse and human MIF genes (28). Nonetheless, the precise pathophysiological role of MIF remains undefined, and its receptor has yet to be identified. Recently, MIF was reported as an anterior pituitary-derived hormone that can override the glucocorticoid-mediated suppression of inflammatory and immune responses (29). MIF has also been shown to be expressed abundantly by macrophages (30) and to potentiate the proinflammatory actions of these cells (28, 29, 30). High levels of MIF expression were found in a variety of inflammatory conditions such as atopic dermatitis in the epidermal layer of inflammatory skin lesions (31), immunologically induced glomerulonephritis (32, 33, 34), and rat adjuvant arthritis (35). Available data also indicate that MIF is associated not only with the immune response but also with cell proliferation and differentiation during wound repair (31) and tumor growth (36). MIF synthesis is up-regulated in human metastatic colon cancer (31) and in metastatic human prostatic adenocarcinoma (37), and the interaction between tumor cells and macrophages in the latter disease has been shown to stimulate angiogenesis and tissue proliferation (38). Moreover, MIF was detected in human vascular endothelial cells (31) and was found to be abundantly expressed in human corneal endothelial and epithelial cells (39, 40, 41) after tissue damage, suggesting a possible role in tissue repair and cell growth. These data, along with our results showing MIF as a major growth promoting factor for endothelial cells produced by endometriotic cells, support the hypothesis that MIF is a key autocrine and paracrine mediator involved in neovascularization and tissue remodeling processes.

Endometriosis, defined as the ectopic growth of endometrial tissue, is frequently associated with an immunoinflammatory process observed both eutopically in the endometrium (42, 43, 44, 45) and ectopically in the peritoneal cavity, where the disease frequently develops (46, 47). Elevated numbers of macrophages was detected in the uterine endometrium (44), within endometriotic lesions (48, 49), and in the peritoneal cavity of patients suffering from endometriosis (50, 51, 52). Furthermore, activated peritoneal macrophages were found to be a major source of VEGF, a factor also expressed by tissue macrophages present in endometriotic lesions (19). Therefore, the finding that MIF can be secreted by endometriotic cells strongly suggests that it may contribute to the angiogenic process via at least two different ways: directly, by stimulating endothelial cell proliferation; and indirectly, by accumulating macrophages. These cells, in addition to their ability to produce VEGF and probably other angiogenic factors, represent a major source of MIF itself, as previously reported (30). Further studies are required, however, to evaluate the angiogenic activity of MIF in vivo and its expression in different types of endometriotic lesions. In fact, biochemically active endometriosis lesions (53), such as red vesicles and hemorrhagic lesions, are characterized by increased vascularization both around and within the endometriotic tissue, suggesting active neovascularization or angiogenic processes; whereas pigmented hypovascularized lesions are less active, and white lesions are considered as scars (11, 13).

Other fractions displaying potent mitogenic activity toward endothelial cells were also isolated in the experiments presented in this paper. Further investigations will be required to identify the factor(s) responsible for this activity and to determine the nature of the proteins that were copurified with MIF in the bioactive fraction F1a and their contribution the mitogenic activity observed.

In conclusion, this investigation revealed that MIF is a novel and a potent growth-promoting factor for human endothelial cells. This could be of considerable interest for the understanding of numerous angiogenesis-associated pathologies or inflammatory conditions, including endometriosis and neovascularization processes occurring in tissues such as human endometrium undergoing dynamic changes.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank France Côté for technical assistance and Marie-Claude Boivin for typing the manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
1 Supported by Grant MOP-37921 (to A.A.) from the Medical Research Council of Canada. Back

2 Holds a Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Inc. Canada fellowship in endocrinology of reproduction. Back

3 A Chercheur-Boursier Senior of the Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec. Back

Received December 3, 1999.

Revised July 31, 2000.

Accepted August 18, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Strathy JH, Molgaard CA, Coulman CB. 1982 Endometriosis and infertility: a laparoscopic study of endometriosis among fertile and infertile women. Fertil Steril. 38:667–672.[Medline]
  2. Sampson JA. 1927 Peritoneal endometriosis due to the menstrual dissemination of endometrial tissue into the peritoneal cavity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 14:422–469.
  3. Risau W. 1997 Mechanisms of angiogenesis. Nature. 386:671–674.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Folkman J. 1995 Angiogenesis in cancer, vascular, rheumatoid and other disease. Nat Med. 1:27–31.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Hanahan D, Folkman J. 1996 Patterns and emerging mechanisms of the angiogenic switch during tumorigenesis. Cell. 86:353–364.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Potgens AJG, Lubsen NH, Van Altena MC, Schoenmakers JGG, Ruiter DJ, de Waal RM. 1995 Vascular permeability factor expression influences tumor angiogenesis in human melanoma lines xenografted to nude mice. Am J Pathol. 146:147–209.
  7. Kim KJ, Li B, Winer J, et al. 1993 Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor induced angiogenesis suppresses tumor growth in vivo. Nature. 362:841–844.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Koch AE, Harlow LA, Haines GK, et al. 1994 Vascular endothelial growth factor. A cytokine modulating endothelial function in rheumatoid arthritis. J Immunol. 152:4149–4156.[Abstract]
  9. Ross R. 1993 The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: a perspective for the 1990s. Nature. 362:801–809.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Noyes R, Hertig A, Rock J. 1950 Dating the endometrial biopsy. Fertil Steril. 1:3–25.
  11. Shaw RW. 1993 An atlas of endometriosis. New York: Parthenon Publishing Group; 23–25.
  12. Smith SK. 1997 Angiogenesis. Semin Reprod Endocrinol. 15:221–227.[Medline]
  13. Nisolle M, Casanas-Roux F, Anaf V, Mine JM, Donnez J. 1993 Morphometric study of the stromal vascularization in peritoneal endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 59:681–684.[Medline]
  14. Folkman J, Shing Y. 1992 Angiogenesis. J Biol Chem. 267:10931–10934.[Free Full Text]
  15. Frederick JL, Shimanuki T, di Zerega GS. 1984 Initiation of angiogenesis by human follicular fluid. Science. 224:389–390.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Gospodarowicz D, Ferrara N, Schweigerer L, Neufel G. 1987 Structural characterization and biological functions of fibroblast growth factor. Endocr Rev. 8:95–114.[Medline]
  17. Oosterlynck DJ, Meuleman C, Sobis H, Vandeputte M, Koninckx PR. 1993 Angiogenic activity of peritoneal fluid from women with endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 59:778–782.[Medline]
  18. Shifren JL, Tseng JF, Zaloudek CJ, et al. 1996 Ovarian steroid regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor in the human endometrium; implications for angiogenesis during the menstrual cycle and in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:3112–3118.[Abstract]
  19. McLaren J, Prentice A, Charnock-Jones DS, et al. 1996 Vascular endothelial growth factor is produced by peritoneal fluid macrophages in endometriosis and is regulated by ovarian steroids. J Clin Invest. 98:482–489.[Medline]
  20. Akoum A, Lavoie J, Drouin R, et al. 1999 Physiological and cytogenetic characterization of immortalized human endometriotic cells containing episomal SV40 DNA. Am J Pathol. 154:1245–1257.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Laemmli UK. 1970 Cleavage of structural proteins of the head of the bacteriophage T4. Nature. 277:680–685.
  22. Wilson KJ, Yuan PM. 1989 Protein sequencing, a practical approach. In: Finlay JBC, Geisow MJ, eds. Practical approach series. New York: Oxford University Press; 13–18.
  23. Williams KR, Stone KL. 1997 Enzymatic cleavage and HPLC peptide mapping of proteins. In: Walker J, ed. Molecular biotechnology. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 155–167.
  24. Chesney J, Metz C, Bache M, Peng T, Meinhards A, Bucala R. 1999 An essential role for macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) in angiogenesis and the growth of a murine lymphoma. Mol Med. 5:181–191.[Medline]
  25. Bloom BR, Bennet B. 1966 Mechanism of a reaction in vitro associated with delayed type hypersensitivity. Science. 153:80–82.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. David JR. 1966 Delayed hypersensitivity in vitro; its mediation by cell-free substances formed by lymphoid cell-antigen interaction. Pathology. 56:72–77.
  27. Nathan CF, Karnovsky ML, David JR. 1971 Alterations of macrophage functions by mediators from lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 133:1356–1376.[Abstract]
  28. Bernhagen J, Mitchell RA, Calandra T, Voelter W, Cerami A, Bucala R. 1994 Purification, bioactivity and secondary structure analysis of mouse and human macrophage migration inhibitory factor (NHF). Biochemistry. 33:14144–14155.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Calandra T, Bernhagen J, Metz CN, et al. 1995 MIF as a glucocorticoid-induced modulator of cytokine production. Nature. 377:68–71.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Calandra T, Bernhagen J, Mitchell RA, Bucala R. 1994 The macrophage is an important and previously unrecognized source of macrophage migration inhibitory factor. J Exp Med. 179:1895–1902.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Nishihira J. 1998 Novel pathophysiological aspects of macrophage migration inhibitory factor. Int J Mol Med. 2:17–28.[Medline]
  32. Lan HY, Bacher M, Yang N, et al. 1997 The pathogenic role of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in immunological induced kidney disease in the rat. J Exp Med. 185:1455–1465.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Miyazaki K, Isbel NM, Lan I-IY, et al. 1997 Up-regulation of macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) and migration inhibitory factor (MIF) expression and monocyte recruitment during lipid-induced glomerular injury in the exogenous hypercholesterolemic rat. Clin Exp Immunol. 108:318–323.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Tesch GH, Nikolic-Paterson DJ, Metz CN, et al. 1998 Rat mesangial cells express macrophage migration inhibitory factor in vitro and in vivo. J Am Soc Nephrol. 9:417–424.[Abstract]
  35. Leech M, Metz C, Santos L, et al. 1998 Involvement of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in the evolution of rat adjuvant arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 41:910–917.[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Takahashi N, Nishihira J, Sato Y, et al. 1998 Involvement of macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) in the mechanism of tumor cell growth. Mol Med. 4:707–714.[Medline]
  37. Meyer-Siegler K, Hudson PB. 1996 Enhanced expression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma metastases. Urology. 48:448–452.[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Meyer-Siegler K, Fattor RA, Hudson PB. 1998 Expression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in the human prostate. Diagn Mol Pathol. 7:44–50.[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Matsuda A, Tagawa Y, Matsuda H, Nishihira J. 1996 Identification and immunohistochemical localization of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in human cornea. FEBS Lett. 385:225–228.[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Matsuda A, Tagawa Y, Yoshida K, Matsuda H, Nishihira J. 1997 Expression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in rat retina and its immunohistochemical localization. J Neuroimmunol. 77:85–90.[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Matsuda A, Tagawa Y, Matsuda H, Nishihira J. 1997 Expression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in rat corneal wound healing. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 38:1555–1562.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Giudice LC, Tazuke S, Swiersz L. 1998 Status of current research on endometriosis. J Reprod Med. 43:252–262.[Medline]
  43. Jolicoeur C, Boutouil M, Drouin R, Paradis L, Lemay A, Akoum A. 1998 Increased expression of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 in the endometrium of women with endometriosis. Am J Pathol. 152:125–133.[Abstract]
  44. Ota H, Igarashi S, Hayakawa M, Matsui T, Tanaka H, Tanaka T. 1996 Effect of danazol on the immunocompetent cells in the eutopic endometrium in patients with endometriosis: a multicenter cooperative study. Fertil Steril. 65:545–551.[Medline]
  45. Tseng JF, Ryan IP, Milam TD, et al. 1996 Interleukin-6 secretion in vitro is up-regulated in ectopic and eutopic endometrial stromal cells from women with endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:1118–1122.[Abstract]
  46. Akoum A, Lemay A, McColi S, Turcot-Lemay L, Maheux R. 1996 Elevated concentration and biological activity of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 in the peritoneal fluid of patients with endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 66:17–23.[Medline]
  47. Oral E, Olive DL, Arici A. 1996 The peritoneal environment endometriosis. Hum Reprod Update. 2:385–398.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Cirkel U, Ochs H, Mues B, Zwaldo G, Sorg C, Schneider HP. 1993 Inflammatory reaction in endometriotic tissue: an immunohistochemical study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 48:43–50.[CrossRef][Medline]
  49. Klein NA, Pergola CM, Tekmal RR, Montoya IA, Dey TD, Schenken RS. 1994 Cytokine regulation of cellular proliferation in endometriosis. Ann NY Acad Sci. 734:322–332.[Abstract]
  50. Halme J, Becker S, Hammond MG, Raj MHG, Raj S. 1983 Increased activation of pelvic macrophages in infertile women with mild endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 145:333–337.[Medline]
  51. Haney AF, Muscato JJ, Weinberg JB. 1981 Peritoneal fluid cell populations in infertility patients. Fertil Steril. 35:696–698.[Medline]
  52. Zeller JM, Henig L, Radwanska E, Dmowski WP. 1987 Enhancement of human monocyte and peritoneal macrophage chemiluminescence activities in women with endometriosis. Am J Reprod Immunol Microbiol. 13:78–82.[Medline]
  53. Vernon MW, Beard JS, Graves K, Wilson EA. 1986 Classification of endometriotic implants by morphologic appearance and capacity to synthesize prostaglandins. Fertil Steril. 46:801–806.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Bio.Home page
R. L. Damico, A. Chesley, L. Johnston, E. P. Bind, E. Amaro, J. Nijmeh, B. Karakas, L. Welsh, D. B. Pearse, J. G. N. Garcia, et al.
Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor Governs Endothelial Cell Sensitivity to LPS-Induced Apoptosis
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., July 1, 2008; 39(1): 77 - 85.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
U. A. Kayisli, M. Berkkanoglu, Lufang Zhang, G. Kizilay, and A. Arici
The Broad-Spectrum Chemokine Inhibitor NR58-3.14.3 Suppresses the Implantation and Survival of Human Endometrial Implants in the Nude Mice Endometriosis Model
Reproductive Sciences, December 1, 2007; 14(8): 825 - 835.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
Z. Z. Zhao, D. R. Nyholt, L. Le, S. Thomas, C. Engwerda, L. Randall, S. A. Treloar, and G. W. Montgomery
Genetic variation in tumour necrosis factor and lymphotoxin is not associated with endometriosis in an Australian sample
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2007; 22(9): 2389 - 2397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
M. W. Laschke and M. D. Menger
In vitro and in vivo approaches to study angiogenesis in the pathophysiology and therapy of endometriosis
Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2007; 13(4): 331 - 342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
F. Ietta, Y. Wu, R. Romagnoli, N. Soleymanlou, B. Orsini, S. Zamudio, L. Paulesu, and I. Caniggia
Oxygen regulation of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in human placenta
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, January 1, 2007; 292(1): E272 - E280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
X-X He, J Yang, Y-W Ding, W Liu, Q-Y Shen, and H H-X Xia
Increased epithelial and serum expression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) in gastric cancer: potential role of MIF in gastric carcinogenesis
Gut, June 1, 2006; 55(6): 797 - 802.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
W.G. Cao, M. Morin, V. Sengers, C. Metz, T. Roger, R. Maheux, and A. Akoum
Tumour necrosis factor-{alpha} up-regulates macrophage migration inhibitory factor expression in endometrial stromal cells via the nuclear transcription factor NF-{kappa}B
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2006; 21(2): 421 - 428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R. Kats, M. Al-Akoum, S. Guay, C. Metz, and A. Akoum
Cycle-dependent expression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in the human endometrium
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2005; 20(12): 3518 - 3525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. Murdoch, M. Muthana, and C. E. Lewis
Hypoxia Regulates Macrophage Functions in Inflammation
J. Immunol., November 15, 2005; 175(10): 6257 - 6263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
W.-G. Cao, M. Morin, C. Metz, R. Maheux, and A. Akoum
Stimulation of Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor Expression in Endometrial Stromal Cells by Interleukin 1, beta Involving the Nuclear Transcription Factor NF{kappa}B
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2005; 73(3): 565 - 570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Akoum, C. N. Metz, and M. Morin
Marked Increase in Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor Synthesis and Secretion in Human Endometrial Cells in Response to Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Hormone
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2005; 90(5): 2904 - 2910.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
L. Paulesu, C. Cateni, R. Romagnoli, F. Ietta, and V. Dantzer
Variation in Macrophage-Migration-Inhibitory-Factor Immunoreactivity During Porcine Gestation
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2005; 72(4): 949 - 953.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
H. H.-X. Xia, S. T. Zhang, S. K. Lam, M. C.-M. Lin, H. F. Kung, and B. C.-Y. Wong
Expression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and effects of bile acids and NSAIDs
Carcinogenesis, January 1, 2005; 26(1): 11 - 15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Shimizu, J. Nishihira, H. Watanabe, R. Abe, A. Honda, T. Ishibashi, and H. Shimizu
Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor Is Induced by Thrombin and Factor Xa in Endothelial Cells
J. Biol. Chem., April 2, 2004; 279(14): 13729 - 13737.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. M. Isidori, G. A. Kaltsas, M. Korbonits, M. Pyle, M. Gueorguiev, A. Meinhardt, C. Metz, N. Petrovsky, V. Popovic, R. Bucala, et al.
Response of Serum Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor Levels to Stimulation or Suppression of the Hypothalamo-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis in Normal Subjects and Patients with Cushing's Disease
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2002; 87(4): 1834 - 1840.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. Kats, C. N. Metz, and A. Akoum
Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor Is Markedly Expressed in Active and Early-Stage Endometriotic Lesions
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2002; 87(2): 883 - 889.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar