help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Azizi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ménard, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Azizi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ménard, J.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 85, No. 11 4331-4337
Copyright © 2000 by The Endocrine Society


Original Studies

Influence of the M235T Polymorphism of Human Angiotensinogen (AGT) on Plasma AGT and Renin Concentrations after Ethinylestradiol Administration1

Michel Azizi, Marie-Charlotte Hallouin, Xavier Jeunemaitre, Than Tam Guyene and Joël Ménard

Centre d’Investigations Cliniques 9201 (M.A., M.-C.H., T.T.G., J.M.) and Laboratoire de Biologie Moléculaire (X.J.), Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) et INSERM, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, 75908 Paris, France

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Michel Azizi, Centre d’Investigations Cliniques 9201, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, 20–40 rue Leblanc, 75908, Paris Cedex 15, France. E-mail: michel.azizi{at}egp.ap-hop-paris.fr


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The T235 allele of the angiotensinogen (AGT) gene is associated with plasma AGT concentration and pregnancy-induced hypertension. The aim of this study was to compare changes in the circulating renin-angiotensin system after short-term (2 days) and repeated (7 days) administration of 50 µg ethinylestradiol (EE) in homozygous normotensive men (TT and MM). After repeated EE administration, renin stimulation was induced by a single oral dose of 40 mg furosemide, followed by 50 mg captopril, 12 h later. The short-term administration of EE did not induce a significant differential genotype-dependent increase in AGT concentration. In the 7-day study, TT subjects had higher peak plasma AGT concentrations than MM subjects. The more pronounced AGT increase in TT subjects resulted in similar plasma renin activity at a lower plasma active renin concentration, with a higher plasma renin activity/active renin ratio. The difference between genotypes in renin secretion resulted in readjustment of angiotensins production. In conclusion, the T235 allele of the AGT gene is associated with greater stimulation of AGT secretion in plasma after EE administration. In the short-term, complete readjustment of the circulating renin-angiotensin system occurs, through a decrease in renin release, which blunts the effects of the increase in AGT concentration.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
MECHANISMS RESPONSIBLE for estrogen-induced hypertension have been discussed for many years (1, 2). One of the major biological effects of the synthetic estrogens contained in oral contraceptive pills is a marked and dose-dependent increase in renin substrate concentration in plasma (3) caused by an increase in its hepatic synthesis (4). Plasma angiotensinogen (AGT) concentration is at about the Km of its reaction with renin; therefore, changes in AGT concentration may affect the in vitro and in vivo generation of angiotensin (Ang) I (5, 6). Estrogen-induced increases in plasma AGT concentration are thought to be a susceptibility factor for the increase in blood pressure observed in patients using oral estrogen-containing contraceptives (7). However, physiologically, changes in plasma AGT concentration are usually accompanied by inversely proportional changes in renin secretion, because the increase in plasma Ang II concentration after an increase in plasma AGT concentration, regulates renin release via a short-term negative feed-back loop (2, 8). This readjustment of renin release and secretion limits the direct effects of plasma AGT concentration changes on blood pressure, provided that the negative feedback mechanism controlling renin secretion operates normally. It has been suggested that, in women who become hypertensive while using oral contraceptives, the increase in circulating Ang II concentration resulting from higher AGT concentrations does not exert the expected inhibitory effect on renin release and secretion (9).

The discovery that the human AGT gene is involved in essential hypertension revived interest in AGT (10). One of several molecular variants, the M235T polymorphism, was associated with a 10–30% increase in plasma AGT concentration (11). Its association with plasma AGT is thought to result from almost complete linkage disequilibrium with a nucleotide substitution close to the initial transcription start site (G-6A), which affects the basal transcription rate of the AGT gene in vitro (12) and in vivo (13, 14, 15). Chronic increases in plasma AGT concentration may slightly increase blood pressure and facilitate hypertension, in conditions in which AGT synthesis is stimulated.

Whether the M235T polymorphism may influence the plasma concentration of the protein in plasma in response to estrogens has not been tested yet in humans. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the influence of the M235T polymorphism on the ethinylestradiol (EE)-induced increase in plasma AGT concentration and on the resulting generation of Ang I and Ang II in plasma. Two different protocols were used, involving short-term and sustained oral administration of EE in healthy male subjects selected on the basis of their AGT genotype. To investigate more in depth the influence of the M235T polymorphism on the physiology of renin secretion, acute renin release was induced by mild sodium depletion followed by a single oral administration of captopril.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Exp 1: short-term stimulation

This experiment was designed to observe the effect of the M235T genotype on early changes in renin-angiotensin system (RAS) activity after a small increase in plasma AGT concentration.

Twenty-four normotensive Caucasian male subjects homozygous for the M235T genotype (MM = 12 and TT = 12), 18–35 yr old, were included in this short-term stimulation study. They were given two oral doses of 50 µg EE on the first (day 1) and third (day 3) days at 0900 h. Throughout the study, volunteers were instructed to follow their usual sodium diet.

Blood samples were taken before the study and on days 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 (at 0900 h) for plasma AGT determination. Plasma active renin and plasma renin activity (PRA) were determined before EE intake (day 1) and on day 4.

Exp 2: 7 days’ oral administration of 50 µg EE

From the results of Exp 1, we calculated that seven subjects per group were necessary for Exp 2 to achieve a difference in stimulated plasma AGT concentrations of 700 ng Ang I/mL between the TT and the MM subjects with an SD of 300 ng Ang I/mL and an {alpha}-risk of 5% and a ß-risk of 20%.

Fifteen normotensive Caucasian male homozygous subjects, 18–35 yr old (MM = 8 and TT = 7), were instructed to arrive at the center at 0800 h each day, from the first (day 1) to the seventh (day 7) day of the study. They were given 50 µg EE orally with tap water every day. In addition, eight heterozygous Caucasian subjects (MT) were given a matched placebo in a single-blind fashion during 7 days.

During this first phase, volunteers were ambulatory and followed their usual sodium diet. Blood samples were taken on days 1 and 7, at 0900 h, for PRA, plasma active renin, AGT, Ang I, and Ang II determinations.

To investigate, in more detail, the consequences of the increase in AGT concentration on the reactivity of the RAS, subjects underwent sodium depletion, followed by acute inhibition of the RAS, as follows: On day 7, subjects were instructed to return to the center at 1800 h. They were given a single oral dose of 40 mg furosemide at 2100 h, followed by a sodium-restricted diet (30 mmol NaCl) to induce mild sodium depletion.

On day 8, after a light caffeine- and fat-free breakfast at 0700 h, subjects were comfortably installed in a semirecumbent position on their beds. An indwelling cannula was inserted into a brachial vein for blood sampling. At 0900 h, after a 1-h rest in the semirecumbent position (to allow equilibration of hormones), each subject was given a single oral dose of 50 mg captopril with 50 mL water and remained in the same position for 6 h. Fluid intake was unrestricted, and subjects were given a light meal, 6 h and 12 h post dose. After the first meal, subjects were allowed to move from their beds. For hormone determinations performed 10 and 24 h post dose, subjects were again placed in the semirecumbent position, 1 h before sampling.

Blood samples were taken before captopril administration and 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 h after captopril administration for PRA, plasma active renin, AGT, Ang I, and Ang II determinations.

Volunteers gave their written informed consent for participation in the protocol, which was approved by the Comité Consultatif de Protection des Personnes se prêtant à des Recherches Biomédicales (Paris-Cochin, France). The procedures followed were in accordance with guidelines proposed in The Declaration of Helsinki.

Laboratory methods

For each hormone determination, subjects were placed in a semirecumbent position, 1 h before blood sampling. Heparinized tubes were used to collect blood for plasma AGT, active renin, and PRA determinations. For plasma angiotensin RIAs, blood samples (10 mL) were collected rapidly (within 10 sec) into prechilled EDTA-K3 vacutainers; and 0.5 mL of an inhibitor mixture containing 62.5 mmol/L EDTA, 100 µM of the renin inhibitor, remikiren, and 100 µmol/L enalaprilat was immediately added to prevent the generation and degradation of angiotensins in vitro (16). Blood samples were immediately centrifuged at 3500 rpm at 4 C and were stored at -80 C until assay.

Plasma AGT was determined by measuring the generation of Ang I after addition of an excess human renin to obtain complete cleavage to Ang I. Plasma (0.25 µL) was incubated at 37 C for 1 h with 0.062 pmol/L pure human recombinant renin (0.025 Goldblatt Units; final concentration of 0.125 nmol/L; a gift from Dr. Walter Fischli, Hoffman-LaRoche Inc.) in 0.5 mL of 0.15 mol/L citrate/phosphate buffer (pH 5.7) containing 50 mmol/L EDTA[Na2], 1.4 mmol/L phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride, and 0.2% BSA. The reaction was stopped by placing the tubes in an iced-water bath at 4 C. The amount of Ang I generated was determined using a polyclonal antibody, as previously described (17). The standard Ang I used in these experiments was purchased from the National Biological Standards Board (Holly Hill, Hampstead, London, UK). For each sample, the mean of two Ang I concentrations was calculated with the Multicalc software of the CliniGamma 1272 counter (LKB, Finland). The limit for detection of Ang I was 40 pg/mL incubated. AGT concentrations were expressed as ng Ang I/mL of plasma. To check intraassay precision, 3 samples were tested 8 times in the same assay. The following coefficients of variation were obtained: 5.5% for 619 ng Ang I/mL, 2.2% for 1053 ng Ang I/mL, and 5.5% for 5600 ng Ang I/mL. For interassay precision, the same 3 samples were measured in 12 assays, giving coefficients of variation of 14%, 7%, and 7%, respectively. Plasma AGT was determined in triplicate, and a mean of the 3 values was then calculated.

Plasma active renin was determined by immunoradiometric assay (18) using a commercially available kit (ERIA, Diagnostics Pasteur, Marnes-la Coquette, France). PRA was determined at pH 7.4, as previously described (19). The anti-Ang I polyclonal antibody used was the same as that used for the AGT enzyme assay. The PRA/active renin ratio was used to estimate the amount of Ang I (pg/h) generated per picogram renin.

Plasma angiotensins were determined after extraction on a single Bondelut column, as previously described (20).

All hormone determinations were performed blind to the genotype and treatment.

M235T genotyping was performed using a mutagenetically separated amplification method, as previously described (21).

Statistical methods

Exp 1. The area under the plasma-time curves (AUC) up to the last measured time-point (0–120 h) was calculated according to the trapezoidal rule. The maximum value, at peak for plasma AGT concentration, was determined from the concentration-time curves for each subject and then averaged. The initial slope for the increase in plasma AGT concentration with time (up to 72 h) was calculated for each subject by determining the slope of the regression line best fitting the plot of plasma AGT concentration vs. time. The values were then averaged. Between-genotype differences were analyzed using unpaired t tests.

For plasma active renin, PRA, and AGT, a one-way ANOVA with one repeated factor (time) and one grouping factor (genotype) was used to test the effect of EE administration.

Exp 2. We first assessed the effects of EE vs. placebo independently of M235T genotype. Data from the stimulation phase (from day 1 to day 7) were analyzed by a one-way ANOVA with one repeated factor (time) and one grouping factor (treatment). For the captopril study on day 8, baseline values on day 8, the AUCs (between day 8 and day 9), and the values at peak were compared using unpaired t tests.

We then assessed the effect of the M235T genotype on the response to EE administration. From day 1 to day 7 (stimulation phase), data were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA with one repeated factor (time) and one grouping factor (genotype). For the second phase (captopril study), baseline values on day 8, the AUCs (between day 8 and day 9), and the values at peak were compared between genotypes using unpaired t-tests.

The homogeneity of the variance was checked for each variable, and logarithmic transformation was used where appropriate.

Calculations were done with Statview 5.1 statistical software (Abacus Concepts Inc., Berkeley, CA). Data are expressed as means ± 1 SD in the tables, means ± 1 SEM in the figures, and are otherwise specified. P < 0.05 was considered significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Exp 1

At baseline, plasma AGT, active renin, and PRA levels did not significantly differ between the TT and the MM subjects (Table 1Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Hormonal parameters in MM and TT subjects after intake of 2 doses of 50 µg ethinylestradiol on day 1 and on day 3

 
From baseline to day 4, the two 50-µg doses of EE significantly increased plasma AGT concentration (F3,66 = 16, P < 0.0001; Fig. 1Go). There was a high level of interindividual variability in plasma AGT concentration at baseline (range, 652-1651 ng Ang I/mL) and after EE stimulation (range, 950-2564 ng Ang I/mL). The difference in peak plasma AGT levels between the MM and TT subjects was not significant (1448 ± 284 vs. 1577 ± 390 ng Ang I/mL, respectively). There was also no significant difference for the slope of plasma AGT concentration vs. time and for the AUC 0–120 h of plasma AGT concentration vs. time (not shown).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Time course evolution of plasma AGT concentration in 12 normotensive male homozygous MM subjects ({circ}) and 12 TT subjects (•) after 2 oral doses of 50 µg EE given 48 h apart.

 
Plasma active renin concentration and PRA increased significantly between baseline and day 4 (F1,22 = 9, P < 0.01; and F1,22 = 16, P < 0.001, respectively). The increase in plasma AGT concentration resulted in a significant increase in the PRA/active renin ratio over time (F1,22 = 12.5, P = 0.002). The PRA/active renin ratio was significantly correlated with plasma AGT concentration (r = 0.61, n = 24, P = 0.002). Again, no significant difference was observed between the MM and TT subjects.

Exp 2

Effects of repeated administration of EE vs. placebo. At baseline (day 1), none of the hormonal variables differed significantly between the EE and placebo groups (Table 2Go and Fig. 2Go). EE administration resulted in significantly larger increases in plasma AGT levels on day 7, by a median of 77% (range, 26–293%), than for the controls [12% (range, -14% to +39%), P < 0.001]. The in vitro Ang I production rate (PRA/active renin ratio) increased significantly in the EE group, whereas it remained stable in the placebo group (F1,22 = 14, P < 0.01, Table 2Go). Plasma active renin, Ang I and Ang II concentrations, and PRA were not significantly affected by EE administration, as shown by comparison with placebo and baseline levels (Table 2Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Effects of 7 days oral administration of ethynilestradiol on plasma angiotensinogen, active renin, and PRA in normotensive male subjects

 


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Time course evolution of plasma AGT concentration and RAS parameters after intake of 50 µg of EE ({blacktriangleup}) or placebo ({triangleup}), from day 1 to day 7, followed by a stimulation of renin release by furosemide and captopril on day 8, in healthy male subjects.

 
On day 8, 12 h after furosemide intake, plasma active renin concentration was significantly lower in the EE than in the placebo group (34 ± 16 vs. 59 ± 31 pg/mL, P < 0.05, respectively), but PRA was similar (980 ± 322 vs. 1171 ± 326 pg Ang I/mL/h, respectively; Fig. 2Go). Thus, the PRA/active renin ratio was significantly higher in the EE group than in the placebo group (34 ± 16 vs. 22 ± 6 pg Ang I/h·pg, P < 0.05, respectively).

After captopril administration, the increase in plasma active renin concentration was significantly smaller for the EE group than for the placebo group (AUC of plasma active renin vs. time, 1747 ± 901 vs. 2996 ± 1923 pg·h/mL; P < 0.05, respectively; Fig. 2Go), whereas PRA concentrations at peak were similar in both groups (Fig. 2Go). The in vitro Ang I production rate (PRA/active renin ratio) was significantly higher in the EE group than in the placebo group, but similar plasma Ang I and Ang II concentrations were observed in both groups after captopril administration, because of a decrease in renin release (Fig. 2Go).

Effect of the M235T genotype on the response to repeated EE administration. At baseline (day 1), none of the hormonal variables differed significantly between genotypes (Table 3Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Effects of 7 days oral administration of ethynilestradiol on plasma angiotensinogen, active renin, and PRA in normotensive male subjects, according to the M235T genotype

 
After 7 days of EE administration, plasma AGT concentration had increased more in TT subjects than in MM subjects [median (range), 133% (35–293%) vs. 61% (26–175%), respectively; F1,13 = 4.2; P = 0.06; Table 3Go and Fig. 3Go]. The slope of the increase in plasma AGT vs. time was significantly steeper in TT subjects (261 ± 131 ng Ang I/mL·day) than in MM subjects (146 ± 75 ng Ang I/mL·day, P = 0.05). Interindividual variability in plasma AGT levels was greater in TT subjects than in MM subjects on day 1 and was even more so on day 7 (Table 3Go).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Time course evolution of plasma AGT concentration and RAS parameters after intake of 50 µg of EE, from day 1 to day 7, followed by a stimulation of renin release by furosemide and captopril on day 8, in eight normotensive male homozygous MM subjects ({circ}) and seven TT subjects (•).

 
From day 1 to day 7, no significant differences between genotypes were observed for changes in PRA and plasma active renin, Ang I, and Ang II concentrations. There was, however, a tendency for active renin levels to decrease and for PRA to increase. The PRA/active renin ratio increased significantly between day 1 and day 7, and this increase was significantly larger in TT than in MM subjects (62 ± 35 vs. 34 ± 22 pg Ang I/h·pg, P < 0.001, respectively; Table 3Go and Fig. 3Go). On day 8, 12 h after furosemide intake, plasma Ang I and Ang II concentrations did not significantly differ between genotypes. Plasma active renin concentration was lower in the TT subjects than in the MM subjects, but the difference between groups was not statistically significant (27 ± 11 vs. 40 ± 18 pg/mL, P = 0.10, respectively). In contrast, PRA was similar in the two groups. Thus, the in vitro Ang I production rate was significantly higher in TT than in MM subjects (41 ± 13 vs. 29 ± 16 pg Ang I/h·pg, P < 0.05, respectively; Fig. 3Go).

After captopril intake, plasma active renin levels remained significantly lower in the TT group than in the MM group (AUC of plasma active renin vs. time, 1237 ± 691 vs. 2194 ± 853 pg·h/mL, P < 0.05; and peak plasma active renin, 201 ± 145 vs. 350 ± 157 pg/mL, P < 0.05, respectively; Fig. 3Go). PRA did not differ significantly between the TT and MM subjects (6651 ± 3054 vs. 9587 ± 3416 pg Ang I/mL·h; P = 0.13) and PRA/active renin ratio remained significantly higher in TT than in MM subjects after captopril intake (46 ± 15 vs. 31 ± 13 pg Ang I/h·pg, P < 0.05, respectively). Plasma Ang I levels did not differ significantly between the TT and MM subjects (AUC of plasma Ang I vs. time, 844 ± 331 vs. 1512 ± 936 pg·h/mL; P = 0.13, respectively).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The aim of this study was to investigate whether the M235T genotype affected the AGT response to short-term and repeated oral administration of 50 µg EE. We used oral EE rather than natural estrogens because it is the most commonly used form of synthetic estrogen in oral contraceptive pills and because it is the most powerful known stimulator of AGT among estrogens (22). Normotensive male subjects were used rather than female subjects in both studies, to eliminate the hormonal effects of the ovarian cycle. This study provides the first evidence that, under stimulation by EE, the M235T polymorphism affects the physiology of the RAS, via the homeostatic effect of angiotensins on renin release.

We first analyzed the effects of EE independently of genotype. Both short-term and repeated oral administration of EE significantly increased plasma AGT levels. The increase in renin substrate was accompanied by a full readjustment of the circulating RAS, which was more complete after the seventh dose than after the second dose of EE. Despite a 77% (range, 26–293%) increase in plasma AGT concentration with EE treatment, the plasma Ang I and Ang II concentrations, achieved by stimulation of renin release by administration of furosemide and captopril, were similar for the EE and placebo groups (see Fig. 2Go). The similarity in plasma Ang I and Ang II concentrations, observed in both groups, was attributable to a decrease in renin release after sodium depletion and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition in the EE group, even though the in vitro Ang I production rate (PRA/active renin ratio) was significantly higher in the EE group than in the placebo group. The decrease in renin release after furosemide and ACE inhibition after EE administration was probably caused by the inhibition of renin release by high local Ang II concentrations at the level of the juxtaglomerular cells in the presence of an increase in AGT (23). Actually, EE administration reduced, although not significantly, plasma active renin concentrations from day 1 to day 7. Partial suppression of renin release and synthesis, as a consequence of high concentrations of renin substrate during the administration of synthetic estrogens, has been previously reported in rat models (8, 23) and in humans (3). It has also been reported during the oral administration of natural estrogens in postmenopausal women (24).

The physiological response to an estrogen-induced increase in plasma AGT concentration involves complete readjustment of the RAS via the effects of the Ang II negative feedback loop on renin release. This confirms that hypertension caused by estrogen-containing oral contraceptive pills cannot be solely caused by the increase in renin substrate concentration (9).

The second step of our study was to look for possible effects of the M235T polymorphism on EE-induced AGT stimulation and on the subsequent readjustment of the RAS. Before EE administration, no difference was observed between the plasma AGT concentrations of MM and TT subjects, likely explained by the slight basal effect of the genotype (10, 25) and the small size of our sample. The short-term administration of EE (50 µg, twice) did not induce a differential genotype-dependent increase in AGT concentration, although TT subjects had slightly (but not significantly) higher plasma AGT concentrations than MM subjects. In the 7-day study, TT subjects did achieve higher plasma AGT concentrations than MM subjects despite both groups having similar baseline plasma AGT levels. There was, however, considerable interindividual variability in baseline and, particularly, in stimulated plasma AGT concentrations. The observed increase in the variability of plasma AGT levels, after 7 days of EE administration, is probably attributable to the high level of variability in EE pharmacokinetics (26) and metabolism (27). In addition, the reentry of the drug into circulation via the enterohepatic cycle (28) and its secondary release from adipose tissue pools (29) may also be involved in whole-plasma AGT level variability. Even greater variability was observed in TT subjects and could be attributed to a greater genetic diversity in AGT genes carrying T235, compared with their M235 counterparts (21). A careful control salt diet may have also limited the interindividual variability and facilitate the detection of genotypic differences.

The influence of the M235T polymorphism on plasma AGT concentration and its consequences on the readjustment of the RAS after EE administration provides strong indirect support for these results. After 7 days of EE administration, the more pronounced increase in AGT concentration in TT subjects resulted in similar PRA levels, with lower plasma active renin concentration and, therefore, higher PRA/active renin ratios. This effect of the concentration of the renin substrate on Ang I generation is consistent with the kinetics of its reaction with renin (5) and is operative in vitro and in vivo (3). The difference in renin stimulation according to genotype was even more pronounced after furosemide and captopril intake. The genotype difference in renin secretion led to a readjustment of Ang I generation in vivo, with even a trend toward lower PRA and plasma Ang I levels in TT subjects. These results are consistent with those obtained by Danser et al. (30) for the German population of the MONICA survey. Analysis of 228 men and 168 women in the German cohort showed that the T235 allele was significantly associated with lower concentrations of plasma active renin and prorenin, thus indicating a decrease in both renin release and synthesis. This epidemiological study and our physiological investigation provide altogether strong evidence that the T235 allele promotes increased Ang I generation compensated at the plasma level by the negative feedback exerted by Ang II on renin release.

It is difficult to extrapolate these results to estrogen- induced hypertension or pregnancy-induced hypertension because: 1) our study was restricted to male subjects who were given EE during a short period of time; and 2) the consequences of EE administration were only assessed on the circulating RAS. Campbell et al. (23) found that the administration of synthetic estrogens to rats induces an increase in the concentration of angiotensin peptides in the kidney, whereas a decrease is observed in plasma. It is therefore possible to observe no change in the equilibrium of the circulating RAS despite an increase in angiotensin production in the kidney. Because the T235 allele has been associated with the nonmodulating phenotype in hypertensive patients, a phenotypic trait characterized by a failure to modulate renal blood flow to Ang II during high sodium intake (31), the TT genotype may therefore be one of several susceptibility factors for the development of hypertension under EE administration, especially by increasing the local formation of Ang II, independently of the circulating system. Subtle changes in renal blood flow have indeed been observed in women whose AGT levels increased because of oral administration of synthetic estrogens (32).

In conclusion, this study demonstrates that the T235 allele of the AGT gene is associated with an enhanced stimulation of AGT secretion after the administration of EE in normotensive male subjects. Over a short period of time, a full readjustment of the circulating RAS occurs, blunting the effects of the renin substrate increase. Whether these changes may favor EE-induced hypertension during oral contraception or pregnancy-induced hypertension remains a plausible hypothesis.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank the nursing staff of the Clinical Investigation Center at Broussais Hospital (D. Ménard, J. Meunier, O. Picart, and M. Godeau) who ran the protocol. The technical contribution of C. Dollin, who performed the assays, is also much appreciated. We also thank V. Boccio for genotype determination.


    Footnotes
 
1 Supported by a joint grant from Institut de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (no. 94C17011, 95078), Association Claude Bernard, and Naturalia et Biologia. Back

Received May 22, 2000.

Revised July 20, 2000.

Accepted July 25, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Laragh JH, Sealey JE, Ledingham JG, Newton MA. 1967 Oral contraceptives. Renin, aldosterone, and high blood pressure. J Am Med Assoc. 201:918–922.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Skinner SL, Lumbers ER, Symonds EM. 1969 Alteration by oral contraceptives of normal menstrual changes in plasma renin activity, concentration and substrate. Clin Sci. 36:67–76.[Medline]
  3. Derkx FH, Steunkel C, Schalekamp MP, Visser W, Huisveld IH, Schalekamp MA. 1986 Immunoreactive renin, prorenin, and enzymatically active renin in plasma during pregnancy and in women taking oral contraceptives. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 63:1008–1015.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Nasjletti A, Masson GM. 1972 Studies on angiotensinogen formation in a liver perfusion system. Circ Res. 31(Suppl 2):187–120.
  5. Gould AB, DeWolf R, Goodman S, Onesti G, Swartz C. 1980 Kinetic studies of the human renin and human substrate reaction. Biochem Med. 24:321–326.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Cumin F, Le-Nguyen D, Castro B, Menard J, Corvol P. 1987 Comparative enzymatic studies of human renin acting on pure natural or synthetic substrates. Biochim Biophys Acta. 913:10–19.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Woods JN. 1988 Oral contraceptive and hypertension. Hypertension. 11(Suppl II): II-11–II-15.
  8. Menard J, Malmejac A, Milliez P. 1970 Influence of diethylstilbestrol on the renin-angiotensin system of male rats. Endocrinology. 86:774–780.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Saruta T, Saade GA, Kaplan NM. 1970 A possible mechanism for hypertension induced by oral contraceptives. Diminished feedback suppression of renin release. Arch Intern Med. 126:621–626.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Jeunemaitre X, Soubrier F, Kotelevtsev YV, et al. 1992 Molecular basis of human hypertension: role of angiotensinogen. Cell. 71:169–180.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Corvol P, Jeunemaitre X. 1997 Molecular genetics of human hypertension: role of angiotensinogen. Endocr Rev. 18:662–677.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Inoue I, Nakajima T, Williams CS, et al. 1997 A nucleotide substitution in the promoter of human angiotensinogen is associated with essential hypertension and affects basal transcription in vitro. J Clin Invest. 99:1786–1797.[Medline]
  13. Morgan T, Craven C, Nelson L, Lalouel JM, Ward K. 1997 Angiotensinogen T235 expression is elevated in decidual spiral arteries. J Clin Invest. 100:1406–1415.[Medline]
  14. Fardella C, Zamorano P, Mosso L, et al. 1999 A(-6)G variant of angiotensinogen gene and aldosterone levels in hypertensives. Hypertension. 34:779–781.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Ishigami T, Tamura K, Fujita T, et al. 1999 Angiotensinogen gene polymorphism near transcription start site and blood pressure: role of a T-to-C transition at intron I. Hypertension. 34:430–434.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Nussberger J, Brunner DB, Waeber B, Brunner HR. 1988 In vitro renin inhibition to prevent generation of angiotensins during determination of angiotensin I and II. Life Sci. 42:1683–1688.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Menard J, Catt KJ. 1972 Measurement of renin activity, concentration and substrate in rat plasma by radioimmunoassay of angiotensin I. Endocrinology. 90:422–430.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Ménard J, Guyene TT, Corvol P, Pau B, Simon D, Roncucci R. 1985 Direct radioimmunoassay of active renin in human plasma. J Hypertens. 3:275–278.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Poulsen K, Jorgensen J. 1974 An easy radioimmunological microassay of renin activity, concentration and substrate in human and animal plasma and tissues based on angiotensin I trapping by antibody. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 39:816–825.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Azizi M, Chatellier G, Guyene TT, Murieta-Geoffroy D, Ménard J. 1995 Additive effects of combined angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and angiotensin II antagonism on blood pressure and renin release in sodium-depleted normotensives. Circulation. 92:825–834.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Jeunemaitre X, Inoue I, Williams C, et al. 1997 Haplotypes of angiotensinogen in essential hypertension. Am J Hum Genet. 60:1448–1460.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Mashchak CA, Lobo RA, Dozono-Takano R, et al. 1982 Comparison of pharmacodynamic properties of various estrogen formulations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 144:511–518.[Medline]
  23. Campbell DJ. 1997 Differential regulation of angiotensin peptides in plasma and kidney; effects of adrenalectomy and estrogen treatment. Clin Exp Hypertens. 19:687–698.
  24. Schunkert H, Danser AH, Hense HW, Derkx FH, Kürzinger S, Riegger GA. 1997 Effects of estrogen replacement therapy on the renin-angiotensin system in postmenopausal women. Circulation. 95:39–45.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Paillard F, Chansel D, Brand E, et al. 1999 Genotype-phenotype relationships for the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in a normal population. Hypertension. 34:423–429.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Goldzieher JW, Dozier TS, de la Pena A. 1980 Plasma levels and pharmacokinetics of ethynyl estrogens in various populations. I. Ethynylestradiol. Contraception. 21:1–16.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Khan FS, Fotherby K. 1983 Sulphation of contraceptive steroids. J Steroid Biochem. 19:1657–1660.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Orme ML, Back DJ. 1990 Factors affecting the enterohepatic circulation of oral contraceptive steroids. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 163:2146–2152.[Medline]
  29. Deslypere JP, Verdonck L, Vermeulen A. 1985 Fat tissue; a steroid reservoir and site of steroid metabolism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 61:564–570.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Danser AH, Derkx FH, Hense HW, Jeunemaître X, Riegger GA, Schunkert H. 1998 Angiotensinogen (M235T) and angiotensin-converting enzyme (I/D) polymorphisms in association with plasma renin and prorenin levels. J Hypertens. 16:1879–1883.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Hopkins PN, Lifton RP, Hollenberg NK, et al. 1996 Blunted renal vascular response to angiotensin II is associated with a common variant of the angiotensinogen gene and obesity. J Hypertens. 14:199–207.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Hollenberg NK, Williams GH, Burger B, Chenitz W, Hoosmand I, Adams DF. 1976 Renal blood flow and its response to angiotensin II. An interaction between oral contraceptive agents, sodium intake, and the renin- angiotensin system in healthy young women. Circ Res. 38:35–40.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
In VivoHome page
A. GLUBA, M. BANACH, D. P. MIKHAILIDIS, and J. RYSZ
Genetic Determinants of Cardiovascular Disease: The Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, Paraoxonases, Endothelin-1, Nitric Oxide Synthase and Adrenergic Receptors
In Vivo, September 1, 2009; 23(5): 797 - 812.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. Sitruk-Ware, G. Plu-Bureau, J. Menard, J. Conard, S. Kumar, J.-C. Thalabard, B. Tokay, and P. Bouchard
Effects of Oral and Transvaginal Ethinyl Estradiol on Hemostatic Factors and Hepatic Proteins in a Randomized, Crossover Study
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2007; 92(6): 2074 - 2079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
J. R. Lindsay and L. K. Nieman
The Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis in Pregnancy: Challenges in Disease Detection and Treatment
Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2005; 26(6): 775 - 799.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
A. A. Sethi, B. G. Nordestgaard, M.-L. M. Gronholdt, R. Steffensen, G. Jensen, and A. Tybjaerg-Hansen
Angiotensinogen Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms, Elevated Blood Pressure, and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease
Hypertension, June 1, 2003; 41(6): 1202 - 1211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
B. Cvetkovic, H. L. Keen, X. Zhang, D. Davis, B. Yang, and C. D. Sigmund
Physiological significance of two common haplotypes of human angiotensinogen using gene targeting in the mouse
Physiol Genomics, December 3, 2002; 11(3): 253 - 262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
J R Ortlepp, H P Vosberg, S Reith, F Ohme, N G Mahon, D Schroder, H G Klues, P Hanrath, and W J McKenna
Genetic polymorphisms in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system associated with expression of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a study of five polymorphic genes in a family with a disease causing mutation in the myosin binding protein C gene
Heart, March 1, 2002; 87(3): 270 - 275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Azizi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ménard, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Azizi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ménard, J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals