| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Original Studies |
Department of Clinical Science, Endocrine Section, University of Rome La Sapienza (R.B., G.T.), 00161 Rome, Italy; Department of Molecular and Clinical Endocrinology and Oncology, University of Naples Federico II (A.C., P.M., D.F., G.L.), Naples, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine, Endocrinology Division, University of Turin (P.R., E.C., D.G., F.C.), Turin, Italy; and Department of Experimental Medicine, University of LAquila (M.-L.J.-R., E.F.), LAquila, Italy
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Roberto Baldelli, M.D., Ph.D., Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche (Istituto Clinica Medica II), University of Rome La Sapienza, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161 Rome, Italy. E-mail: baldelli{at}katamail.com
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In conclusion, a 24-month treatment with slow release lanreotide (30 mg) is effective in reducing GH and IGF-I levels; furthermore, in de novo patients it induces disease control in 70% of patients and causes tumor shrinkage in 22% of them, with excellent compliance. These data suggest that LAN can be used in long-term treatment of acromegalic patients.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Lanreotide (Ipsen Laboratories), a slow release (SR-) formulation of the somatostatin analog BIM 23014, requiring an im injection every 714 days, has become available in the last few years in Italy. The effects of a short-term treatment with SR-lanreotide (LAN) on GH and IGF-I hypersecretion were similar to those obtained with octreotide (20, 21, 22, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37), whereas the results of chronic treatment have been poorly investigated. In one study, LAN was reported to normalize GH and IGF-I hypersecretion in 27.7% and 63.6% of 22 patients treated for 24/36 months (22).
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of a 24-month LAN treatment in a large group of acromegalic patients. The possibility that different therapeutic efficacy was shown by LAN in de novo patients compared with those previously treated with sc OCT was also investigated.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One-hundred and eighteen patients with active acromegaly, 51 males and 67 females, aged 49.4 ± 15.4 yr (mean ± SD; range, 2082 yr; median, 50 yr), were included in this open study that was performed at the Universities of Rome, Naples, and Turin (Italy). At study entry, acromegaly was clinically diagnosed on the basis of acral enlargement, patient interview, and comparison of photographs taken during a 1- to 2-decade span to date the onset of acral enlargement. Biochemical diagnosis was carried out by assessing high plasma GH levels (75.9 ± 8.1 mU/L), not suppressible below 3.0 mU/L after oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), elevated age-matched plasma IGF-I values (693.6 ± 30.2 ng/mL). The OGTT was performed by measuring blood glucose and GH every 30 min for 2 h after the oral administration of 75 g glucose. In 4 patients with overt diabetes, OGTT was not performed. Ninety-one patients presented at diagnosis with microadenoma (mA), and 27 presented with macroadenoma (MA). In particular, 23 patients were newly diagnosed (de novo patients), and 95 patients had been treated with sc OCT before starting LAN treatment. Among these 95 unselected patients, 71 had also been previously operated on by the transsphenoidal or transcranial route (operated patients), whereas 24 of them had received conventional postoperative radiotherapy at least 15 yr before entering the study (irradiated patients). The evidence of pituitary adenoma or remnant tissue was confirmed in 84 of the 95 OCT-pretreated patients by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) scan. Eleven patients had secondary empty sella after surgery and/or radiotherapy. The group of de novo patients included 15 women (age, 51.4 ± 4.9 yr; range, 2277 yr; median, 50 yr) and 8 men (age, 45.1 ± 4.5 yr; range, 2965; median, 46 yr); 8 patients had mA, and 15 had MA, with suprasellar and/or parasellar invasion in 12 patients. The most common visual field defect, represented by bitemporal hemianopsia, was present in 7 MA patients showing compression of the optic chiasm at radiological imaging; moreover, 3 of 23 de novo patients presented with growing headache. All patients gave their informed consent to the study, which was approved by all local ethical committees.
Treatment protocol
At study entry, plasma IGF-I levels were assayed in duplicate from a single sample, whereas the value of plasma GH was calculated as the mean of a 2- to 6-h blood sampling (08001000 h or 08001400 h, with 30-min sampling). Ninety-five patients were treated with OCT (Sandostatina, Novartis, Italy) at an initial dose of 0.150.30 mg/day, sc; this dose was increased to achieve normal GH and IGF-I levels up to 0.6 mg/day. Before starting LAN treatment, all patients underwent a 30- to 60-day wash-out period. A general physical examination was carried out before and every 3 months during treatment. All patients initially received LAN every 14 days over a 3-month period. Thereafter, in 54 patients showing persistently high hormone levels, LAN was administered every 10 days. During treatment, the final GH level was calculated as the average value from at least 3 blood samples collected, at 15-min intervals, just before the next im injection of LAN. The disease control after LAN treatment was considered when basal GH values were less than 7.5 mU/L together with IGF-I values within the normal range for age (27, 28). The time points of the study were defined as follows: T0, pretreatment evaluation in 118 patients; T1, after 6 months of treatment in 118 patients; T2, after 12 months of treatment in 114 patients; and T3, after 24 months of treatment in 99 patients. As radiotherapy induces hormone decrease over a prolonged time, GH and IGF-I levels were measured after 1-month LAN withdrawal in the 24 irradiated patients. All patients underwent gallbladder ultrasonography in the basal condition and after 6, 12, and 24 months of treatment.
Hormonal assays
Plasma GH levels were measured by immunoradiometric assay (HGH-CTK-IRMA Sorin, Saluggia, Italy). The sensitivity of the assay was 0.6 mU/L; 1 µg/L corresponds to 3 mU/L (28). The intra- and interassay coefficients of variation (CVs) were 4.5% and 7.9%, respectively. Plasma IGF-I was determined by RIA after acid-ethanol extraction; intra- and interassay CVs were 3.45.4% and 5.97.1%, respectively. In our laboratories, age-corrected normal ranges for IGF-I levels were less than 483 ng/mL (2030 yr), less than 397 ng/mL (3140 yr), less than 306 ng/mL (4150 yr), and less than 249 ng/mL (>50 yr).
Radiological examination
A CT scan was carried out, before and after iv infusion of
contrast medium using a third generation scanner with 3.5-s acquisition
times, 1.5-mm-thick axial and coronal sections, and scout-views. MRI
(0.51.0 Tesla) was carried out with T1-weighted SE sequences
and 3-mm slides in coronal and sagittal sections before and after
contrast enhancement with gadolinium-DTPA. CT scan or MRI was
carried out in the basal condition and after 6, 12, and 24 months of
LAN therapy. Significant tumor shrinkage was defined as a greater than
20% decrease in the pretreatment tumor volume calculated by the Di
Chiro and Nelson formula: volume = height x length x
width x
/6 (41).
Statistical analysis
Unless otherwise specified, all data are presented as the
mean ± SEM. ANOVA, t test for unpaired
data, Wilcoxon rank test, and
2 test were used
when appropriate; P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Statistical analysis was performed using StatView 5 software for
Windows (SAS Institute, Inc., Chicago, IL).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
2 = 12.54; P < 0.0005 and
2 = 11.95; P < 0.0005,
respectively). Among the 23 de novo patients, significant tumor shrinkage was documented by CT and/or MRI in 5 patients (22%) after 3 (n = 2) and 6 (n = 3) months of LAN treatment. In particular, 5 of 7 patients improved their visual field, and 3 of 3 patients improved headache. Among the 84 operated/irradiated patients with documented tumor remnant at CT and/or MRI, tumor shrinkage was observed in 5 patients (5.9%), whereas no increase in tumor remnants was observed in poorly responsive patients during LAN treatment.
Moreover, when patients were grouped into mA and MA, significantly lower GH plasma levels were found in mA patients basally and after 6 and 12 months of treatment (P < 0.05), whereas significantly lower IGF-I plasma levels were found in mA patients after 6, 12, and 24 months of treatment (P < 0.05; data not shown).
During OCT treatment, abdominal discomfort after the first injections was reported by 64 patients, and steatorrhea was reported by 17 patients. These side effects disappeared spontaneously in 26 patients and after treatment with pancreatic enzymes in some subjects. After the first injection of LAN, abdominal discomfort was reported by 45 and steatorrhea by 10 patients. Fifty of 118 patients reported moderated discomfort at the injection site, lasting less than 2448 h. During LAN treatment period only 2 patients reported serious side effects (worsening of headache, severe abdominal pain, and steatorrhea) that forced them to withdraw from treatment after 6 months. In all of the remaining 116 patients, side effects were mild and spontaneously disappeared 14 days after the first injection, and specific treatment with pancreatic enzymes was required only in 5 patients. Gallbladder ultrasonography was performed in all patients before and during the 24-month LAN treatment; gallstones were detected in 4 patients, and sludge was found in 10 patients. Gallstones and sludge disappeared spontaneously in 1 and 5 patients, respectively, and after ursodehoxicholic acid treatment in the remaining 3 and 5 patients. No patient developed signs of symptomatic colelithiasis or colecistitis.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is relevant to note that this study, in contrast with others, included patients unselected with respect to a previous positive response to OCT treatment (33, 42).
Among the 95 patients previously treated with OCT, 63 (66%) did not achieve disease control during OCT treatment. In contrast with the findings of another study (37), long-term treatment with LAN seems to improve responsiveness in patients poorly responsive to OCT. GH and IGF-I levels during the 24-month LAN treatment period were significantly lower (P < 0.005) in OCT-responsive than in OCT poorly responsive patients, confirming the persistent presence of a group of somatostatin analog-resistant patients. It is important to underline that all patients who responded to OCT also responded to LAN treatment; furthermore, an additional group of patients poorly responsive to OCT became responsive to LAN. In the first study (37) addressing a similar issue, the response to LAN treatment was evaluated during a period of only 6 months. It is, therefore, likely that a longer treatment period with the slow release formulations of somatostatin analogs can produce long-lasting suppression of GH and IGF-I levels. On the basis of previous studies (21, 33), all patients were admitted to LAN treatment at a dose of 30 mg every 14 days for the first 3 months. After this period, in 54 of 118 patients the frequency of LAN injection was increased every 10 days, resulting in disease control in 17% of patients. This indicates that the first modification of the frequency of injection is better performed after 3 months of treatment to achieve a cumulative effect of repeated injections (33, 43). In our group of 118 acromegalic patients, normal GH levels after 6, 12, and 24 months of treatment were achieved in 31%, 56%, and 77% of patients, whereas normal IGF-I levels were achieved in 30%, 47%, and 63% of patients, respectively. Such a discrepancy could be explained either by the presence of physiological fluctuations in GH levels or by other IGF-I control factors that were not GH related (22, 31, 35).
The prevalence of patients not achieving disease control was significantly lower (P < 0.005) in de novo patients (22%) than in those operated upon (36%) and irradiated (63%).
Shrinkage of GH-secreting adenomas has been reported in about 3050% of acromegalic patients treated with OCT (42, 44). In our series, tumor shrinkage could be documented in 5 of 23 de novo patients (22%). A similar percent shrinkage rate was reported in a previous study of 22 patients with acromegaly treated for 13 yr with LAN (22). Moreover, in 5 of 7 patients, visual field improved as a direct consequence of tumor shrinkage; this points out that about one quarter of de novo patients with pretreatment bitemporal hemianopsia did not achieve adequate tumor shrinkage to relieve visual compromise.
The better response observed in de novo patients compared with operated and irradiated patients could be explained by the possible presence of some modification caused by surgery and radiotherapy, such as changes in vascular bed, postsurgery fibrosis, alteration in the density of somatostatin receptors, or wider GH fluctuations during previous OCT therapy. On the other hand, we do not know whether the de novo group contained a higher percentage of patients responsive to OCT therapy, potentially leading to a higher success rate for this group.
The present study suggests that previous treatment with radiotherapy induced partial resistance to somatostatin analogs therapy, as shown by the presence of higher GH and IGF-I levels throughout the 24-month period in the group of irradiated patients; this aspect supports the better response of de novo patients to LAN therapy. This is important information, suggesting that radiotherapy may act as a negative prognostic factor regarding the LAN response. This picture strengthens the concept that previously operated or de novo patients are characterized by a better outcome, in terms of normal GH and IGF-I plasma levels, than patients previously treated with radiotherapy.
Controlled GH levels were achieved in 78% and 58% of mA and MA patients, respectively (P < 0.05).
LAN was well tolerated during the entire study period in all except two patients (1.7%) who withdrew from treatment after 6 months due to the occurrence of severe side effects. The more frequent side effects reported by patients were represented by minor digestive problems such as nausea, abdominal discomfort, and steatorrhea within the first 23 days after the injection. The presence of these side effects did not induce any change in the frequency of LAN administration. Moreover, the presence of abdominal discomfort and steatorrhea was not related to the different regimen of LAN administration. The prevalence and frequency of side effects are superimposable to those reported in previous studies (21, 31, 33, 42).
In conclusion, this 24-month follow-up study demonstrated that the somatostatin analog SR-lanreotide (30 mg) was effective in controlling GH and IGF-I hypersecretion in most acromegalic patients, especially in de novo patients. Previous radiotherapy treatment seems to induce partial resistance to LAN therapy. The higher prevalence of disease control in de novo patients suggests that LAN can be an option as first line therapy in such patients as well as a second line treatment after unsuccessful surgery, as proposed for sc OCT (44), and is accompanied by excellent patient compliance in long-term treatments.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received November 19, 1999.
Revised May 11, 2000.
Revised June 27, 2000.
Accepted July 24, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. D. Murray and S. Melmed A Critical Analysis of Clinically Available Somatostatin Analog Formulations for Therapy of Acromegaly J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2008; 93(8): 2957 - 2968. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Colao, R. Pivonello, R. S Auriemma, M. C. De Martino, M. Bidlingmaier, F. Briganti, F. Tortora, P. Burman, I. A Kourides, C. J Strasburger, et al. Efficacy of 12-month treatment with the GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant in patients with acromegaly resistant to long-term, high-dose somatostatin analog treatment: effect on IGF-I levels, tumor mass, hypertension and glucose tolerance. Eur. J. Endocrinol., March 1, 2006; 154(3): 467 - 477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. U. Freda, L. Katznelson, A. J. van der Lely, C. M. Reyes, S. Zhao, and D. Rabinowitz Long-Acting Somatostatin Analog Therapy of Acromegaly: A Meta-Analysis J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2005; 90(8): 4465 - 4473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Melmed, R. Sternberg, D. Cook, A. Klibanski, P. Chanson, V. Bonert, M. L. Vance, D. Rhew, D. Kleinberg, and A. Barkan A Critical Analysis of Pituitary Tumor Shrinkage during Primary Medical Therapy in Acromegaly J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2005; 90(7): 4405 - 4410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Vezzosi, A. Bennet, P. Rochaix, F. Courbon, J. Selves, B. Pradere, L. Buscail, C. Susini, and P. Caron Octreotide in insulinoma patients: efficacy on hypoglycemia, relationships with Octreoscan scintigraphy and immunostaining with anti-sst2A and anti-sst5 antibodies Eur. J. Endocrinol., May 1, 2005; 152(5): 757 - 767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Bevan The Antitumoral Effects of Somatostatin Analog Therapy in Acromegaly J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2005; 90(3): 1856 - 1863. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Petrossians, L. Borges-Martins, C. Espinoza, A. Daly, D. Betea, H. Valdes-Socin, A. Stevenaert, P. Chanson, and A. Beckers Gross total resection or debulking of pituitary adenomas improves hormonal control of acromegaly by somatostatin analogs Eur. J. Endocrinol., January 1, 2005; 152(1): 61 - 66. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Attanasio, R. Baldelli, R. Pivonello, S. Grottoli, L. Bocca, V. Gasco, M. Giusti, G. Tamburrano, A. Colao, and R. Cozzi Lanreotide 60 mg, a New Long-Acting Formulation: Effectiveness in the Chronic Treatment of Acromegaly J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2003; 88(11): 5258 - 5265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Clemmons, K. Chihara, P. U. Freda, K. K. Y. Ho, A. Klibanski, S. Melmed, S. M. Shalet, C. J. Strasburger, P. J. Trainer, and M. O. Thorner Optimizing Control of Acromegaly: Integrating a Growth Hormone Receptor Antagonist into the Treatment Algorithm J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2003; 88(10): 4759 - 4767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Attanasio, P. Epaminonda, E. Motti, E. Giugni, L. Ventrella, R. Cozzi, M. Farabola, P. Loli, P. Beck-Peccoz, and M. Arosio Gamma-Knife Radiosurgery in Acromegaly: A 4-Year Follow-Up Study J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2003; 88(7): 3105 - 3112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z Merza Modern treatment of acromegaly Postgrad. Med. J., April 1, 2003; 79(930): 189 - 194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ben-Shlomo and S. Melmed The Role of Pharmacotherapy in Perioperative Management of Patients with Acromegaly J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2003; 88(3): 963 - 968. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Colao, M. De Rosa, R. Pivonello, A. Balestrieri, P. Cappabianca, A. Di Sarno, V. Rochira, C. Carani, and G. Lombardi Short-Term Suppression of GH and IGF-I Levels Improves Gonadal Function and Sperm Parameters in Men with Acromegaly J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2002; 87(9): 4193 - 4197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. U. Freda Somatostatin Analogs in Acromegaly J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2002; 87(7): 3013 - 3018. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Ph. Caron, A. Beckers, D. R. Cullen, M. I. Goth, B. Gutt, P. Laurberg, A. M. Pico, M. Valimaki, and W. Zgliczynski Efficacy of the New Long-Acting Formulation of Lanreotide (Lanreotide Autogel) in the Management of Acromegaly J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2002; 87(1): 99 - 104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Colao, D. Ferone, P. Marzullo, P. Cappabianca, S. Cirillo, V. Boerlin, I. Lancranjan, and G. Lombardi Long-Term Effects of Depot Long-Acting Somatostatin Analog Octreotide on Hormone Levels and Tumor Mass in Acromegaly J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2001; 86(6): 2779 - 2786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |