help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Raggi, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Orlando, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Raggi, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Orlando, C.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 85, No. 10 3866-3873
Copyright © 2000 by The Endocrine Society


Original Studies

Quantitative Determination of sst2 Gene Expression in Neuroblastoma Tumor Predicts Patient Outcome1

Claudia Casini Raggi, Mario Maggi, Daniela Renzi, Antonino Calabrò, Maria Letizia Bagnoni, Paola Scaruffi, Gian Paolo Tonini, Mario Pazzagli, Bruno De Bernardi, Gabriella Bernini, Mario Serio and Claudio Orlando

Clinical Biochemistry (C.C.R., M.L.B., M.P., C.O.), Andrology (M.M.), Gastroenterology (D.R., A.C.), and Endocrinology (M.S.) Units, Department of Clinical Physiopathology, and Department of Pediatrics (G.B.), University of Florence; Laboratory of Population Genetics, National Institute for Cancer Research (P.S., G.P.T.); and Department of Hematology-Oncology, Giannina Gaslini (B.D.B.), Genoa, Italy

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Mario Maggi, M.D., Andrology Unit, Department of Clinical Physiopathology, University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini 6, 50139 Florence, Italy. E-mail m.maggi{at}dfc.unifi.it


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Neuroblastoma (NB) is the most common pediatric neuroendocrine tumor, and it is characterized by a quite variable clinical course. We previously found a great variability in the expression of somatostatin receptor type 2 (sst2) in several human NB cell lines and primary tumors. In this report we investigated whether expression of sst2 is somehow related to clinical outcome. We performed a retrospective study on 54 patients with a maximum follow-up of 100 months. The concentration of specific messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) for sst2 was measured by competitive RT-PCR and validated, in a small subset of samples, by quantitative imaging of gene (in situ hybridization) and protein (immunohistochemistry) expression. We found that sst2 mRNA was variably expressed in all NB tumors (range, 2.5 x 105 to 8 x 109 molecules/µg RNA) with a relevant reduction in the more advanced stage (P < 0.01). Analysis of Kaplan-Meier curves indicated that sst2 expression is positively related to the overall (P < 0.0001) and event-free (P < 0.0001) survival. Expression of sst2 was negatively related to tumor stage (P < 0.02) and MYCN amplification (P < 0.001), a poor prognostic factor. However, the prognostic information derived from sst2 is apparently independent from MYCN amplification, as assessed by stratifying sst2 values according to MYCN. In addition, the expression of sst2 was the only significant prognostic factor (P < 0.02) when it was included in a multivariate model containing other well known prognostic factors such as age, stage, and MYCN amplification. Hence, we propose that sst2 expression represents a new prognostic marker for NB. The main clinical value of a quantitative measure of sst2 lies in its ability to detect patients at low risk, independently from other prognostic factor, including MYCN amplification.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
NEUROBLASTOMA (NB) is a childhood neuroendocrine neoplasm that originates in cells of the neural crest. It is the most common extracranial solid cancer of early childhood (1). Because of its biological complexity, the clinical course of the disease is quite variable (2). Although NB is often lethal, a subset of patients has a favorable outcome, including the tumor evolving into a more benign form or regressing spontaneously (2). The clinical stage of the disease (3), age of child at diagnosis (4), and biochemical (5, 6, 7, 8, 9) and molecular markers (10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17) may help to identify patients with a poor prognosis. This is particularly relevant to tailored therapy according to the risk of recurrent disease. In clinical practice, among the different biochemical and molecular markers, the measurement of MYCN amplification remains the cornerstone molecular parameter routinely determined at diagnosis (2, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25). Indeed, the amplification of this oncogene predicts rapid tumor progression and poor outcome in patients of essentially any age or stage (19, 20, 26, 27). However, by using a conventional Southern blot approach, MYCN amplification is detected in only one third to one half of all highly aggressive tumors (28). Hence, this factor alone often provides insufficient information on which to base therapeutic decisions.

We previously reported that several human NB cell lines expressed a rather variable density of receptors for the neuroendocrine hormone somatostatin (SS) (29). Later, we found that there was a dramatic correlation among the quantitative evaluation of sst2 protein expression (binding studies), sst2 gene expression (competitive RT-PCR), and SS responsiveness (17, 29). We found that only cell lines with a density of sst2 expression over 7 x 107 molecules/µg ribonucleic acid (RNA) were responsive to SS in terms of DNA synthesis, inhibition of adenylate cyclase activity, and calcium mobilization (17, 29). Hence, we suggested that this concentration of transcript represents a sort of biological threshold separating SS-responsive from unresponsive NB cells (17). By using competitive RT-PCR, we analyzed sst2 expression in a limited number of primary NB tumors (17). We essentially found that the abundance of sst2 transcripts in NB tumors was quite variable, spanning over 4 log orders of magnitude. Dividing NB tumors according to the aforementioned biological threshold of sst2 expression (7 x 107 molecules/µg RNA), we found that high levels of sst2 were positively related to survival (17, 30). A further study demonstrated that the ex vivo quantitative determination of sst2 was in good agreement with the in vivo semiquantitative determination of sst2 protein, as assessed by indium-111-pentetreotide imaging (30).

In the present report we have studied retrospectively 54 children with NB in whom sst2 expression was measured by competitive RT-PCR. This parameter was correlated to initial prognostic feature and patient outcome to determine its prognostic relevance and clinical impact.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients and samples

We studied 54 tumors from children with NB that had been diagnosed from 1988 to 1997 in Italy. The only criterion for patient selection was the availability of sufficient amounts of RNA for quantitative PCR analysis. DNA was also available for all samples. Nucleic acid specimens were obtained from the Italian Neuroblastoma Tissue Bank (Genoa, Italy). Tissue samples were obtained at surgery and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Total RNA and DNA were extracted from frozen samples with a standard phenol-chloroform procedure. In addition, each RNA extract was submitted to the treatment with 4 U RQ1 ribonuclease (RNase)-free deoxyribonuclease (Promega Corp. Italia, Milan, Italy).

All patients were staged according to the International Neuroblastoma Staging System (INSS) (31) as follows: 9 patients (16.7%) stage 1; 5 patients (9.3%) stage 2A; 4 patients (7.4%) stage 2B; 10 patients (18.4%) stage 3, 21 patients (38.9%) stage 4, and 5 patients (9.3%) stage 4S.

Competitive PCR for MYCN amplification and sst2 messenger RNA (mRNA) measurement

The number of MYCN copies in extracted DNA was measured with a competitive PCR assay using a cloned multiple competitor (pONC) containing competitive sequences for different oncogenes (MYCN, c-myc, int-2, c-erbB-2, and epidermal growth factor receptor) and for the single copy reference gene ß-globin (32). The primers and assay procedure were previously reported (32). The method included two subsequent PCR reactions. In the first, the exact amount of DNA was determined by referring to the ß-globin gene. At least three dilutions of pONC DNA (from 1500–6000 molecules) were mixed with a constant amount of extracted DNA (5 ng) and subjected to PCR amplification. PCR products, corresponding to DNA target and competitor template, were then resolved on a 12% polyacrylamide gel, stained with ethidium bromide, and quantitated by image analysis (33). The densitometric ratios of the two bands were plotted vs. the concentrations of added competitor. The exact number of DNA molecules in the initial sample was extrapolated at the equivalence (i.e. the competitor concentration that gives a 1:1 competitor/target ratio).

Oncogene amplification was measured for each sample in a second PCR, in which a constant amount of DNA (1,500 genome equivalents) was mixed with three dilutions of pONC competitor (1,500, 4,500, and 13,500 molecules), corresponding to MYCN amplifications of 1-, 3-, and 9-fold. For samples exceeding 9-fold amplification, a further PCR was performed, reducing the initial sample DNA concentration accordingly. The electrophoretic resolution of PCR products and image analysis calculation was the same as that previously described for ß-globin assay. PCR amplification of ß-globin and MYCN genes was performed with a Gene Amp 2400 thermal cycler (Perkin-Elmer Corp., Norwalk, CT) with a 40-cycle program at 94 C for 30 s, 60 C for 30 s, and 72 C for 30 s.

Similarly, for the measurement of sst2 mRNA expression we developed a synthetic RNA competitor cloned in pSSR-I plasmid downstream to the T7 RNA polymerase promoter, as previously reported (17). For each sample, 1 µg total RNA was mixed with an increasing quantity of RNA competitor (generally from 1 x 105 to 1 x 109 molecules) and reverse transcribed in a 25-µL reaction volume containing 2.5 µmol/L random examiners (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany), 50 U Moloney leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Perkin-Elmer Corp.), 0.2 U RNase inhibitor (Promega Corp.), 1 mmol/L deoxy-NTPs (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), and 5 mmol/L NaCl2. PCR amplification was performed with described primers (17) with 40 cycles of 30 s at 94 C and 60 s at 62 C plus a final extension step for 7 min at 62 C. Each sample was also submitted to a conventional PCR with the same primers and cycling, but without RT, to exclude the presence of residual genomic DNA in extracted specimens. The exact amount of sst2 mRNA was calculated after densitometric analysis of 10 µL PCR products, as described for MYCN measurement, and expressed as mRNA molecules per µg total RNA. Figure 1Go shows two typical competitive RT-PCRs for sst2 measurement in a neuroblastoma tumor (A and B) and in normal human testis (C), employed as an example of a low sst2-expressing tissue. Figure 1BGo shows the linear relationship between the number of competitor molecules added and the densitometric ratios between products corresponding to competitor and transcript, as derived from Fig. 1AGo. The number of sst2 mRNA molecules was extrapolated from the point closer to the equivalence of a 1:1 competitor/target ratio. Figure 1CGo shows experimental controls, including positive controls, PCR blank, and analysis of a very low sst2-expressing tissue.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Competitive RT-PCR for sst2 mRNA measurement. For each experiment, 1-µg aliquots of total RNA were reverse transcribed and amplified together with an increasing number of competitor molecules, indicated at the top of the gel (A, lines 1–5). After competitive PCR, the bands corresponding to competitor and transcript products were resolved by gel electrophoresis. The densitometric ratios were evaluated using image analysis, and values were plotted against the number of competitor molecules added. Experimental points were fitted by a linear function, and the number of sst2 mRNA molecules was extrapolated from the point of equivalence of a 1:1 competitor/target ratio (see dotted line, B). In C we report some experimental controls: competitor- and target-positive controls (lines 6 and 7) and PCR blank control (line 12). In lines 8–11 is an example of a very low sst2 mRNA-expressing sample, i.e. human testis. M, DNA marker.

 
In situ hybridization

Frozen sections (7 µm thick) were collected onto gelatin/chrome alum-coated slides, dried briefly on a hot plate at 80 C, and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde/phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4, for 20 min. After three washes in PBS and short air drying, sections were immediately used for in situ hybridization.

For preparation of the RNA probe for sst2, the 284-bp fragment of the human sst2 complementary DNA obtained by RT-PCR with the primers described was subcloned into the appropriate restriction site of the plasmid pGEM-T Vector (Promega Corp., Madison, WI). After linearization of the plasmid with either ApaI or SalI restriction endonuclease, SP6 or T7 RNA polymerase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) was employed to obtain run-off transcripts of the antisense (complementary to mRNA) or sense (anticomplementary, negative control) strands, respectively. Transcription and labeling of RNA probes were performed as previously described (33, 34), using 60 µCi [35S]UTP (1250 Ci/mmol; NEN Life Science Products, Dreieich, Germany). RNA probes were stored at -80 C and used within 2 weeks. The specific activity routinely obtained was 1.2–1.4 x 109 cpm/µg.

Prehybridization, hybridization, removal of nonspecifically bound probe by RNase A digestion, and further washing procedures were performed for positive and negative strand RNA probes as described previously (34). After exposure for 4–6 weeks at 4 C, slides were developed using Kodak D19 developer (Kodak-Pathé, Chalon-S-Saône, France) for 3 min, rinsed in 1% acetic acid, and fixed in Kodak Unifix. After extensive washing, sections were counterstained with hematoxylin and eosin and mounted in Corbitt balsam.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

For IHC, frozen sections (7 µm) serial to those used for in situ hybridization were collected onto clean slides and air-dried overnight at room temperature. After fixation in 4% PFA/PBS, pH 7.4, for 20 min, sections were washed with PBS and incubated in normal goat serum diluted 1:10 in PBS/BSA 2% for 20 min. After two washes in PBS of 5 min each, sections were incubated in 1% H2O2/methanol to block endogenous peroxidase activity.

Immunolocalization of sst2 protein was performed using a polyclonal antiserum (SS-800, Gramsch Laboratories, Schwabhausen, Germany) diluted 1:400 in PBS/1% BSA. This antiserum was generated against the amino acid sequence 355–369 and recognizes the C-terminus of the human SS receptor type 2A. Immunohistochemical staining was then performed using the DAKO Corp. Envision+ System HRP (DAKO Corp., Carpinteria, CA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Finally, sections were weakly counterstained with Mayer’s hemalum and coverslipped using Kayser’s gelatin.

Negative controls were performed by omitting the primary antibody (to control the detection system) and employing nonimmune rabbit serum as the first layer. In addition, the specificity of the immunoreaction was verified by preabsorption of sst2 antiserum with its cognate receptor peptide.

Quantitative image analysis

Quantitative evaluation of sst2 mRNA and protein expression was performed by two independent observers who did not know the results of competitive RT-PCR, with the aid of a computerized video image analysis system (Quantimet Q500MC, Leica Corp. Cambridge Ltd., Cambridge, UK). For the quantitation of in situ hybridization results, six visual fields were chosen randomly from each section and analyzed under a darkfield microscope equipped with a x40 lens. The autoradiographic signal corresponding to the specific hybridization was acquired by a CCD video camera connected to the microscope, converted to digital, and transformed into pixel units. The threshold of specific detection was automatically calibrated on control sections hybridized with the corresponding sense probes. For quantitation of the immunohistochemical staining, six high power (x40) visual fields were chosen randomly from each section; the video image was generated again by the video camera and digitized for image analysis at 256 gray levels. An optical threshold and filter combination was set to select only the immunohistochemical signal.

The results, evaluated in terms of the percentage of the total area occupied by the sst2 autoradiographic and immunohistochemical signal, are expressed as the mean ± SD.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with software from SPSS, Inc. (Chicago, IL). The associations between clinical characteristics and molecular variables were tested with Fisher’s exact test. The probability of cumulative survival in various subgroups was tested according to Kaplan-Meier life tables (36). Survival differences between groups were tested with the log-rank method. Univariate and multivariate prognostic effects were evaluated with the Cox proportional hazards model (37). The comparison of sst2 expression levels among groups was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Competitive RT-PCR for sst2 mRNA

We found a wide range of expression of sst2 mRNA in all NB analyzed (from 2.5 x 105 to 8 x 109 molecules/µg RNA). As shown in Fig. 2Go, a significant reduction of sst2 expression was observed in patients in stage 4 compared to other stages (P = 0.0092).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Distribution of sst2 mRNA expression in 54 neuroblastomas, measured with competitive RT-PCR. Tumor stage was classified according to the INSS (31 ). The dotted line indicates the biological cut-off off (7 x 107 molecules/µg RNA) separating patients with high sst2 expression from those with low gene expression. The KruskalWallis ANOVA test indicates differences among groups (P = 0.0092). In particular, children at stage 4 have the lowest expression of sst2. Patient outcome is indicated (NED, nonevident disease; AWD, alive with disease; DOD, dead of disease); this is not considered in the present statistical analysis.

 
We classified patients as expressing high or low sst2 mRNA according to a biological cut-off (7 x 107 molecules/µg RNA). This cut-off was previously determined as the threshold that separated the SS-responsive from unresponsive NB cell lines (17). By using the 7 x 107 molecules/µg RNA cut-off, 37 patients were classified in the high range of sst2 expression, and 17 in the low range. In particular, most of the patients in favorable stages 1, 2A, and 2B expressed sst2 above the cut-off of 7 x 107 molecules/µg RNA. According to the clinical stage, the majority of children had a favorable outcome. Only 1 child in stage 2B died of disease. This child showed very low level of sst2 transcript. In the unfavorable stages 3 and 4, 64% of the children with low sst2 expression had a poor outcome, whereas 88% of children with high expression are still alive. Finally, in stage 4S all but 2 patients were in the high sst2 range and are still alive. The two 4S children with low levels of sst2 showed evidence of recurrent disease.

The main clinical characteristics of the patient population and the association of these features with sst2 mRNA levels are shown in Table 1Go. Among the variables tested, stage and MYCN amplification were significantly related to sst2 expression (P < 0.02 and P < 0.001, respectively). No relation was found between sst2 expression, patient sex, and age at diagnosis (P = 0.1635 and 0.11656, respectively).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Clinical characteristics of 54 neuroblastomas according sst2 status

 
The probability of overall survival according to sst2 expression and MYCN amplification, represented as Kaplan-Meier curves, are reported in Fig. 3Go. Children with tumors showing high sst2 expression had a significantly better survival rate than patients with low sst2 expression (P < 0.00001; Fig. 3Go, upper panel). Similarly, a significant inverse relationship was found between MYCN amplification and patient survival (P = 0.0006; Fig. 3Go, lower panel). Analysis of disease-free survival curves further strengthened the high predictivity of sst2 detection (P < 0.00001; Fig. 4Go, upper panel). Conversely, the evaluation of MYCN amplification for disease-free survival was less informative, although still retained a statistically significant predicting power (P = 0.032; Fig. 4Go, lower panel).



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Overall survival probability in 54 patients with neuroblastoma according to sst2 expression (upper panel) and MYCN amplification (lower panel). The Kaplan-Meier curves show the probability of survival in the two groups of patients. The level of sst2 mRNA expression was classified into two groups on the basis of a reported cut-off (17 30 ). Samples with more than one copy of MYCN were classified as amplified. There were significant differences in overall survival between groups divided according to sst2 expression (log rank test = 27.17; P < 0.00001) and MYCN amplification (log rank test = 11.78; P = 0.0006).

 


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Event-free survival probability in 54 patients with neuroblastoma according to sst2 expression (upper panel) and MYCN amplification (lower panel). The Kaplan-Meier curves show the probability of survival in the two groups of patients. The divisions according to sst2 mRNA and MYCN amplification were performed as described in Fig. 3Go. There were significant differences for disease-free survival among the groups divided for sst2 expression (log rank test = 21.02; P < 0.00001) and for MYCN amplification (log rank test = 4.58; P = 0.032).

 
As sst2 expression and MYCN amplification were highly related, we then investigated whether sst2 expression was independent from the influence of MYCN amplification. Stratifying the sst2 expression values according to MYCN amplification, we found that the subgroup with high sst2 expression without MYCN amplification had a 100% survival (maximal follow-up, 98 months; see Fig. 5Go). The subgroup with low sst2 expression and MYCN amplification had the lowest survival probability (22%). Overall, analysis of sst2 expression was more predictive than and was independent from MYCN amplification for mortality (P < 0.00001). Children with high sst2 expression and MYCN amplification showed a 75% survival probability. Conversely, the survival rate was only 40% in children with low sst2 expression but without MYCN amplification.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Overall survival in patients grouped according to the combined analysis of sst2 expression and MYCN amplification in neuroblastoma. The Kaplan-Meier curves show the probability of survival in the four groups of patients. Subdivision according to sst2 mRNA and MYCN amplification was performed as described in Fig. 3Go. The levels of sst2 and MYCN amplification were associated with cumulative survival (log rank test = 27.67; degree of freedom = 3; P < 0.00001). Survival was significantly better in the group with high sst2 mRNA expression and single copy MYCN than in all other groups (A vs. B: P = 0.018; A vs. C: P = 0.0021; A vs. D: P < 0.0001). In MYCN-amplified tumors, a significant difference was also between those expressing high (B) vs. low (D) sst2 mRNA (P = 0.019).

 
In univariate analyses (see Table 2Go), we tested the prognostic value of sst2 expression and other well known prognostic markers, such as tumor stage, age, and MYCN amplification. In our patient population, all four parameters had a significant prognostic value. To identify the most powerful prognostic factors, we performed multivariate analysis with the Cox proportional hazards model containing the aforementioned prognostic parameters. According to the Cox regression model, sst2 expression was the only independent prognostic factor for the prediction of patient survival (P = 0.0149; Table 2Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Univariate and multivariate analysis of sst2 prognostic value

 
Immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization for sst2

In a subset of neuroblastoma samples (n = 7), sst2 mRNA expression was also evaluated by in situ hybridization, and in five of them, receptor protein was immunolocalized in the corresponding serial sections. Quantitative image analysis of serial sections revealed an excellent correspondence between sst2 mRNA and protein expression at the tissue level (r = 0.978). We also found that results from in situ hybridization and IHC were well related to the expression of sst2 mRNA as detected by competitive RT-PCR in the corresponding cancer specimens (RT-PCR vs in situ, r = 0.756; RT-PCR vs. IHC, r = 0.814). Linear relationships are reported in Fig. 6Go. Figure 7Go shows results obtained with the three aforementioned techniques in two representative cases of neuroblastoma with different stages of disease (stages 2A and 4). Quantitative RT-PCR indicated a very high level of sst2 expression in the former (8 x 109 molecules/µg RNA) and a relatively low expression in the latter (1 x 107 molecules/µg RNA). Accordingly, the positive signal for either sst2 gene or protein was definitively more abundant in the neoplastic tissue from stage 2A than in that from stage 4.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Comparison of competitive RT-PCR, IHC, and in situ hybridization (ISH) for detecting sst2 expression in neuroblastomas. A subset of representative neuroblastomas with different tumor stages was analyzed for the expression of sst2 mRNA with competitive RT-PCR, quantitative in situ hybridization (n = 7), and IHC (n = 5; for details, see Subjects and Methods). A, In situ hybridization vs. IHC; B, RT-PCR vs. in situ hybridization; C, RT-PCR vs. IHC. Values for in situ hybridization and IHC are expressed in terms of the percentage of the total area occupied by sst2 signals (mean ± SD of six different fields). Note the log scale in B and C.

 


View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Expression of sst2 in neuroblastomas. Two representative cases of neuroblastoma at different tumor stages (left panel, stage 2A; right panel, stage 4) were analyzed for the expression of sst2 mRNA with competitive RT-PCR (a and b), in situ hybridization (c, d and g) and IHC (e–h). Intense mRNA (c) and protein (e) expression was detected by in situ hybridization and IHC in tumors with high levels of sst2 mRNA (8 x 109 molecules/µg RNA) as detected by competitive RT-PCR (a). Conversely, a limited number of silver autoradiographic grains (d) and a low immunoreaction (f) were evident in the tumor with low mRNA expression (b; 1 x 107 molecules/µg RNA). A serial control section hybridized with sst2 sense probe (g) showed only nonspecific background signal. Similarly, preabsorption of sst2 antiserum with its cognate receptor peptide (h) almost completely abolished the immunoreaction. Autoradiographic exposure, 4 weeks. Original magnification, x75.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The discovery of new molecular abnormalities in NB helps in understanding the marked biological heterogeneity and the puzzling clinical presentation and course of this tumor. Indeed, the classical clinical and pathological features of NB cannot provide a complete explanation of tumor behavior and are not very useful in predicting outcome. In this study we report, for the first time, that measuring sst2 expression by competitive RT-PCR sheds new light on the clinical outcome of children affected by NB. Indeed, we found that in our patients sst2 represents the most powerful prognostic marker for NB compared to other well known prognostic parameters, such as stage, age, or MYCN amplification.

Somatostatin is a peptide that, aside from its neuroendocrine functions, also regulates cell proliferation. Recently, a family of SS receptors, essentially characterized by different affinities for several SS analogs, has been cloned (38). Among the different SS receptor subtypes, sst2 is the most sensitive to the commercially available analogs (38) and the most represented in neuroendocrine tumors (39, 40, 41). In addition, sst2 mediate, at least in part the antiproliferative activity of SS. Using an original competitive RT-PCR assay, we demonstrated that sst2 is variably expressed in NB cell lines and that this expression is highly correlated to cellular responsiveness to SS in vitro (17).

In the present study we measured the specific transcript for this receptor subtype in 54 NB. The level of sst2 gene expression was variable, spanning more than 4 log orders of magnitude. Although a high concentration of receptors was detected in NB tumors belonging to all different clinical stages, the lowest level of sst2 was found in the most aggressive stage of the disease (stage 4). In the more favorable stages (stages 1, 2A, and 2B) children expressed elevated concentrations of sst2, with the exception of one child who showed low expression of sst2 and died of the disease. The large majority of children (88%) classified in unfavorable stage 3 or 4 but expressing an elevated density of receptors are still alive. Hence, we hypothesized that the main clinical relevance of sst2 measurement in NB lies in its ability to detect patients at low risk for poor outcome or for recurrent disease.

Analysis of overall and disease-free survival curves according to sst2 expression strongly suggested that this is the case. When the outcome was adjusted to the effect of MYCN, sst2 mRNA expression remained significant. It is important to note that high sst2 expression and a single MYCN copy number identify in our study population a subgroup of children with a totally favorable outcome (100% survival). Of greater importance are results from multivariate analysis. When several established prognostic indicators were combined with sst2 expression as variables in the Cox regression model, only sst2 retained its prognostic significance, independently from all other prognostic indicators.

In this study we also confirmed a previous result (17) indicating a good correspondence between different methods of sst2 mRNA detection in NB samples. Indeed, we previously reported similar results with Northern analysis and competitive RT-PCR (17). In the present study we found a good agreement between the latter method and quantitative analysis of in situ hybridization. More interestingly, we also found a positive relationship between in situ hybridization and IHC results for sst2 in serial sections of the same tumors. In addition, the quantitative image analysis of these preparations revealed good relationships between the measurements with morphological techniques and those obtained with competitive RT-PCR. This is in keeping with previous results showing that the levels of sst2 mRNA expression, measured with competitive RT-PCR, were significantly related to the in vivo semiquantitative determination of sst2 protein, as assessed by indium-111-pentetreotide imaging (30). Finally, we previously demonstrated that the sst2 mRNA concentration was highly correlated to the level of biologically active sst2 protein, as evaluated by binding and functional studies of human neuroblastoma cell lines (17, 29). This evidence demonstrates that in neuroblastoma quantitative determination of sst2 mRNA is highly related to expression of the relative protein.

In conclusion, we demonstrated that quantitation of sst2 expression can provide relevant prognostic information, giving further insight into the biological features of NB. The measurement of this parameter at the time of diagnosis could help to determine the appropriate choice and intensity of treatment. Again, the main clinical value of sst2 as a prognostic marker lies in its ability to detect patients at low risk, independently from the clinical stage, age of diagnosis, and MYCN amplification. Although there is some suggestion that therapy with SS or analogs might provide benefits in cancer patients, this does not seem to be the case in NB. Indeed, according to the present data, patients with high expression of sst2 (and therefore sensitive to SS therapy) have per se a quite favorable outcome. Hence, adjuvant therapy with SS is not necessary. Conversely, patients with poor outcome are essentially characterized by low expression of sst2 (and therefore insensitive to SS therapy). In this case adjuvant therapy with SS might be indicated, but would have few chances of success. In addition, a recent report (42) indicates that the more differentiated NB tumors express a high concentration of SS. It is possible that the degree of expression of SS regulates sst2 expression, because sst2 is known to undergo agonist-induced down-regulation (43). NB cells expressing an elevated density of sst2 receptors (and its natural ligand) may proliferate less (leading to tumor regression) or differentiate more (leading to benign ganglioneuroma) than cells with low expression. Therefore, we believe that induction of sst2 gene expression by medical therapy (i.e. steroids) (44) or gene therapy (45) is a more appropriate goal for the future than the conventional administration of SS and its analogs.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by a grant from the Italian Association for Cancer Research, a fellowship grant from the Italian Association for Neuroblastoma (to M.L.B.), and a fellowship grant from the Italian Foundation for Cancer Research (to P.S.). Back

Received October 11, 1999.

Revised June 1, 2000.

Accepted June 15, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Young JL, Ries LG, Silverberg E, et al. 1986 Cancer incidence, survival and mortality for children under 15 years of age. Cancer. 58:598–602.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Castleberyy RP. 1997 Neuroblastoma. Eur J Cancer. 33:1430–1438.
  3. Evans AE, D’Angio GJ, Randolph JA. 1971 A proposed staging for children with neuroblastoma. Children’s Cancer Study group A. Cancer. 27:374–378.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Brodeur GM, Castleberry RP. 1997 Neuroblastoma. In: Pizzo PA, Poplack DG, eds. Principles and practice of pediatrics oncology. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 761–797.
  5. Hahn HWL, Levy HM, Evans AE. 1980 Serum ferritin as a guide to therapy in neuroblastoma. Cancer Res. 40:1411–1413.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Zeltzer PM, Marangos PJ, Evans AE, Schneider SL. 1986 Serum neuron specific enolase in children with neuroblastoma. Relationship to stage and disease course. Cancer. 57:1230–1234.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Shuster JJ, McWilliams NB, Castleberry R, et al. 1992 Serum lactate dehydrogenase in childhood neuroblastoma. Am J Clin Oncol. 15:295–303.[Medline]
  8. Bertani-Dziedzic L, Dziedzic SW, Gitlow SE. 1990 Catecholamine metabolism in neuroblastoma. In: Pochedly, ed. Neuroblastoma: tumor biology and therapy. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 69–91.
  9. Caron H. 1995 Allelic loss of chromosome 1 and additional chromosome 17 material are both unfavorable prognostic markers in neuroblastoma. Med Pediatr Oncol. 24:215–221.[Medline]
  10. Look AT, Hayes FA, Shuster JJ, et al. 1984 Cellular DNA content as a predictor of response to chemotherapy in infants with unresectable neuroblastoma. N Engl J Med. 311:231–235.[Abstract]
  11. Nakagawara A, Arima-Nakagawara M, Scavarda NJ, et al. 1993 Association between high risk levels of expression of the TRK expression in non-advanced stages. Int J Cancer. 328:847–854.
  12. Chan HSL, Haddad G, Thorner PS. 1991 P-glycoprotein expression as a predictor of the outcome of therapy for neuroblastoma. N Engl J Med. 325:1608–1614.[Abstract]
  13. Norris MD, Bordow SB, Marshall GM, et al. 1996 Association between high levels of expression of the multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) gene and poor outcome in primary human neuroblastoma. N Engl J Med. 334:231–238.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Leone A, Seeger RC, Hong CM, et al. 1993 Evidence for nm23 RNA overexpression, DNA amplification and mutation in aggressive childhood neuroblastomas. Oncogene. 8:855–865.[Medline]
  15. Favrot MC, Combaret V, Lasset C. 1993 CD44- a new prognostic marker for neuroblastoma. N Engl J Med. 329:1965.[Free Full Text]
  16. Hiyama E, Hiyama K, Yokoyama T, et al. 1995 Correlating telomerase activity levels with human neuroblastoma outcomes. Nat Med. 1:249–255.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Sestini R, Orlando C, Peri A, et al. 1996 Quantitation of somatostatin receptor type 2 gene expression in neuroblastoma cell line and primary tumors using competitive reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Clin Cancer Res. 2:1757–1765.[Abstract]
  18. Tonini GP, Boni L, Pession A, et al. 1997 MYCN oncogene amplification in neuroblastoma is associated with worse prognosis, except in stage 4s: the italian experience with 295 children. J Clin Oncol. 15:85–93.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Brodeur GM, Seeger RC, Schwab M, et al. 1984 Amplification of MYCN in untreated human neuroblastomas correlates with advanced disease stage. Science. 224:1121–1124.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Seeger RC, Brodeur GM, Sather H, et al. 1985 Association of multiple copies of MYCN oncogene with rapid progression of neuroblastoma. N Engl J Med. 313:1111–1116.[Abstract]
  21. Tsuda T, Obara M, Hirano H, et al. 1987 Analysis of MYCN amplification in relation to disease stage and histologic types in human neuroblastomas. Cancer. 60:820–826.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Taylor SR, Lochker J. 1990 A comparative analysis of nuclear content and MYCN amplification in neuroblastoma. Cancer. 65:1360–1366.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Bourhis J, De Vathaire F, Wilson GD, et al. 1991 Combined analysis of DNA ploidy index and MYCN genomic content in neuroblastoma. Cancer Res. 51:33–36.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Sansone R, Strigini P, Badiali M, et al. 1991 Age-dependent prognostic significance of MYCN amplification in neuroblastoma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 54:253–257.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Muraji T, Okamoto E, Fujimoto J, et al. 1993 Combined determination of MYCN oncogene amplification and DNA ploidy in neuroblastoma. Cancer. 72:2763–2768.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. De Cremoux P, Thioux M, Peter M, et al. 1997 Polymerase chain reaction compared with dot blotting for the determination of MYCN amplification in neuroblastoma. Int J Cancer. 72:518–521.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Rubie H, Hartmann O, Michon J, et al. 1997 Localized neuroblastoma: MYCN amplification is the main prognostic factor–results of the NBL 90 study. J Clin Oncol. 15:1171–1182.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Tanaka T, Seeger RC, Tanabe M, et al. 1994 Prognostic prediction in neuroblastomas: clinical significance of combined analysis for Ha-ras p21 expression and N-myc gene amplification. Cancer Detect Prev. 18:283–289.[Medline]
  29. Maggi M, Baldi E, Finetti G, et al. 1994 Identification, characterization and biological activity of somatostatin receptors in human neuroblastoma cell lines. Cancer Res. 54:124–133.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Briganti V, Sestini R, Orlando C, et al. 1997 Imaging of somatostatin receptors by indium-111-pentetreotide correlates with quantitative determination of somatostatin receptor type 2 gene expression in neuroblastoma tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 3:2385–2391.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Brodeur GM, Pritchard J, Berthold F, et al. 1993 Revisions in the international criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment in patients with neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 11:1466–1477.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Sestini R, Orlando C, Zentilin L, et al. 1995 Gene amplification for c-erbB-2, c-myc, EGF receptor, int-2 and N-myc measured by quantitative PCR with a multiple competitor template. Clin Chem. 41:826–832.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Orlando C, Sestini R, Zentilin L, et al. 1994 Image analysis in quantitative PCR. An application for the measurement of c-erbB-2 amplification in DNA from human tumors. J Biolum Chemilum. 9:223–228.
  34. Milani S, Herbst H, Schuppan D, et al. 1989 In situ hybridization for procollagen types I, III, and IV mRNA in normal and fibrotic rat liver: evidence for predominant expression in non-parenchymal liver cells. Hepatology. 10:84–92.[Medline]
  35. Calabrò A, Orsini B, Renzi D, et al. 1997 Expression of epidermal growth factor, transforming growth factor-ß and their receptor in the human oesophagus. Histochem J. 29:745–758.[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Kaplan E, Meier P. 1958 Non parametric estimation for incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 58:457–481.[CrossRef]
  37. Mantel H, Haenzel W. 1959 Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 22:719–748.
  38. Patel YC, Srikant C. 1997 Somatostatin receptors. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 8:398–405.[Medline]
  39. Epelbaum J, Bertherat J, Prévost G, et al. 1995 Molecular and pharmacological characterization of somatostatin receptor subtypes in adrenal, extradrenal and malignant pheochromocytomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 80:1837–1844.[Abstract]
  40. Kubota A, Yamada Y, Kagimoto S, et al. 1994 Identification of somatostatin receptor subtypes and an implication of somatostatin analogue SMS 201–995 in treatment of human endocrine tumors. J Clin Invest. 93:13212–1325.
  41. Reubi J-C, Schaer JC, Waser B, et al. 1994 Expression and localization of somatostatin receptor SSTR1, SSTR2 and SSTR3 messenger RNA in primary human tumors using in situ hybridization. Cancer Res. 54:3455–3459.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Kogner P, Borgstrom P, Bjellerup P, et al. 1997 Somatostatin in neuroblastoma and ganglioneuroma. Eur J Cancer. 33:2084–2089.
  43. Dournaud P, Boudin H, Schonbrunn A, et al. 1998: Interrelationships between somatostatin sst2A receptors and somatostatin-containing axons in rat brain: evidence for regulation of cell surface receptors by endogenous somatostatin. J Neurosci. 18:1056–1071.
  44. Xu Y, Berelowitz M, Bruno JF. 1995 Dexamethasone regulates somatostatin receptor subtype messenger ribonucleic acid expression in rat pituitary GH4C1 cells. Endocrinology. 136:5070–5075.[Abstract]
  45. Rochaix P, Delesque N, Esteve JP, et al. 1999 Gene therapy for pancreatic carcinoma: local and distant antitumor effects after somatostatin receptor sst2 gene transfer. Hum Gene Ther. 10:995–1008.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The OncologistHome page
G. Khanna, D. Bushnell, and M. S. O'Dorisio
Utility of Radiolabeled Somatostatin Receptor Analogues for Staging/Restaging and Treatment of Somatostatin Receptor-Positive Pediatric Tumors
Oncologist, April 1, 2008; 13(4): 382 - 389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. H. Long, M. J. Berna, M. Thill, A. Pace, T. K. Pradhan, K. M. Hoffmann, J. Serrano, and R. T. Jensen
Secretin-Receptor and Secretin-Receptor-Variant Expression in Gastrinomas: Correlation with Clinical and Tumoral Features and Secretin and Calcium Provocative Test Results
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2007; 92(11): 4394 - 4402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
S. Ezziddin, T. Logvinski, C. Yong-Hing, H. Ahmadzadehfar, H.-P. Fischer, H. Palmedo, J. Bucerius, M. J. Reinhardt, and H.-J. Biersack
Factors Predicting Tracer Uptake in Somatostatin Receptor and MIBG Scintigraphy of Metastatic Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2006; 47(2): 223 - 233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
N. Ardjomand, N. Ardjomand, G. Schaffler, H. Radner, and Y. El-Shabrawi
Expression of Somatostatin Receptors in Uveal Melanomas
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2003; 44(3): 980 - 987.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
P. Romagnani, M. Rotondi, E. Lazzeri, L. Lasagni, M. Francalanci, A. Buonamano, S. Milani, P. Vitti, L. Chiovato, M. Tonacchera, et al.
Expression of IP-10/CXCL10 and MIG/CXCL9 in the Thyroid and Increased Levels of IP-10/CXCL10 in the Serum of Patients with Recent-Onset Graves' Disease
Am. J. Pathol., July 1, 2002; 161(1): 195 - 206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
C. C. Raggi, A. Calabro, D. Renzi, V. Briganti, F. Cianchi, L. Messerini, R. Valanzano, M. C. Smith, C. Cortesini, F. Tonelli, et al.
Quantitative Evaluation of Somatostatin Receptor Subtype 2 Expression in Sporadic Colorectal Tumor and in the Corresponding Normal Mucosa
Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2002; 8(2): 419 - 427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Raggi, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Orlando, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Raggi, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Orlando, C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals