help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Agwunobi, A. O.
Right arrow Articles by Carlson, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Agwunobi, A. O.
Right arrow Articles by Carlson, G. L.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 85, No. 10 3770-3778
Copyright © 2000 by The Endocrine Society


Original Studies

Insulin Resistance and Substrate Utilization in Human Endotoxemia

Anselm O. Agwunobi, Clare Reid, Paula Maycock, Roderick A. Little and Gordon L. Carlson

Medical Research Council Trauma Group, North West Injury Research Center, University of Manchester, Hope Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom M6 8HD

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Gordon L. Carlson, Medical Research Council Trauma Group, Clinical Sciences Building, Hope Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom M6 8HD. E-mail: gcarlson{at}fs1.ho.man.ac.uk


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Infection results in a state of insulin resistance, but the pathogenesis is poorly understood. Intravenous administration of bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) has been used to mimic the febrile and systemic inflammatory responses to infection, but it is unclear whether LPS induces insulin resistance in man. To investigate the effects of LPS on insulin sensitivity and substrate utilization, we administered, in paired cross-over studies, either 20 U/kg Escherichia coli endotoxin or saline control to healthy volunteers (n = 6) 120 min after the start of a 10-h euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp (insulin infusion rate, 80 mU/m2·min). LPS induced a fever, tachycardia, and mild arterial hypotension. Glucose utilization increased abruptly 120 min after LPS administration (+64.1 ± 12.0%; P < 0.003), but then declined progressively, and insulin resistance was evident by 420 min (+1.9 ± 3.5%; P < 0.05). The reduction in glucose utilization, like that observed in sepsis, was related to impaired nonoxidative glucose disposal and not abnormal glucose oxidation. The cortisol and GH responses to LPS were of sufficient duration and magnitude to explain the insulin resistance. LPS administration results in metabolic responses very similar to those observed in sepsis and could provide a useful model for the study of insulin resistance in human critical illness.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
SEPSIS AND INJURY are associated with an acute, reversible state of insulin resistance (1, 2). Although the underlying mechanisms are incompletely understood, the resulting defect in glucose metabolism appears to be a selective impairment of glucose storage in skeletal muscle, with preserved glucose oxidation (3).

Studies of glucose metabolism in critical illness have generally compared patients with healthy control subjects, but the resulting data are difficult to interpret because of confounding factors in patients, such as age (4), malignant disease (5), nutritional deprivation and immobility (6), and drug treatment (7), which may be impossible to control for. A human model of acute insulin resistance that could be applied to healthy volunteers would therefore be of potential interest for exploration of the underlying mechanisms.

Administration of Gram-negative bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) has been used as a model of severe infection in man and has been shown to reliably induce a febrile systemic inflammatory response with associated hormonal and cytokine changes (8, 9). Conflicting data exist, however, on the effect of LPS on insulin sensitivity. Although the administration of high dose LPS to animals results in insulin resistance (10), other animal studies have shown LPS to induce severe and progressive hypoglycemia (11), and it has been suggested that LPS might either increase insulin sensitivity or possess insulin-like effects (12). The effect of LPS on insulin sensitivity in man has not been studied. Furthermore, although LPS induces a stress hormone response, and prolonged infusion of stress hormones in pharmacological doses has been shown to induce insulin resistance in healthy volunteers (13), patients undergoing major abdominal surgery develop prolonged postoperative insulin resistance in the absence of significant or prolonged changes in plasma stress hormone concentrations (14). It is unclear whether the endogenous production of stress hormones at the physiological levels seen after LPS administration might be associated with impaired insulin sensitivity.

The aim of this study was therefore to determine the nature and time course of the effect of LPS on insulin sensitivity in man and to relate changes in insulin-mediated glucose disposal to the other features of this model of infection.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subjects

Six subjects [four men and two women; aged 33.7 ± 1.7 yr (range, 24–39 yr); body surface area, 1.84 ± 0.06 m2 (range, 1.82–2.01 m2)] were admitted to the clinical investigation facility of Hope Hospital (Salford, UK). Before the study all subjects were screened by history, physical examination, and electrocardiogram. No subject had a prior history of cardiorespiratory disease or diabetes mellitus, and none was receiving any medication. The study was approved by the local research ethics committee of Salford and Trafford Health Authority, and informed consent was obtained in writing from each subject before enrolment in the study.

Study protocol

Each subject was studied on two occasions, 14–21 days apart, in random order, with half of the subjects receiving endotoxin first and half saline. In between studies subjects consumed a weight-maintaining diet providing at least 200 g carbohydrate each day. All subjects were studied at 0830 h after an overnight fast and refrained from smoking or caffeine-containing beverages for 24 h before the study. After voiding, subjects were weighed to the nearest 0.1 kg using an Avery beam balance (Seca Ltd., Birmingham, UK) and were measured to the nearest 1 cm using a calibrated scale (Seca Ltd.). The subjects, lightly clothed, then rested quietly in a supine position for the remainder of the study. Catheters (Venflon, Helsingborg, Sweden) were inserted into an antecubital fossa vein of the right arm (for infusion) and retrogradely into a vein on the dorsum of the left hand (for sampling). The sampling hand was then placed in a hot box (air temperature, 60 C) to produce arterialization of venous blood. Hand skin temperature was maintained at 42 C and was monitored continuously with a thermistor taped to the dorsum (Vickers Medical Ltd., Hampshire, UK). All catheters were kept patent with heparinized saline (Weddel Pharma, Wrexham, UK; 50 U heparin in 150 mmol/L sodium chloride) when not in use. After a 30-min rest period, a 10-h period of euglycemic hyperinsulinemia was commenced, and 120 min later the subjects received either an iv injection of 20 U/kg National Reference Bacterial Endotoxin (lot EC-6, prepared from Escherichia coli 0113, USPC, Inc., Rockville, MD) or an equivalent volume of saline over a 5-min period. Repeated measurements of substrate utilization, hormone, substrate, and cytokine concentrations were performed over the following 8 h as outlined below. At the end of each study, subjects voided again, and urine volume was measured. A 10-mL aliquot was stored at -4 C for later analysis of urinary nitrogen content.

Indirect calorimetry

Open circuit indirect calorimetry was commenced 1 h before the clamp and was then performed for the last 30 min of each of the following 10 h. The calorimeter (Deltratrac, Datex, Helsinki, Finland) was calibrated before and after each measurement with the manufacturer’s recommended gases, having previously been validated by alcohol combustion and shown to deliver values within 98% of those predicted.

Euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp

A primed, continuous, 80 mU/m2·min insulin infusion (Humulin S, Eli Lilly & Co., Basingstoke, UK) was continued for a 10-h period, during which euglycemia (5 mmol/L) was maintained by a variable infusion of aqueous glucose (B.P. 20% glucose, Steriflex, Boots Hospital Products, Nottingham, UK). The concentration of glucose in arterialized venous plasma was monitored at 5-min intervals using an automated glucose oxidase-based glucose analyzer, (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Fullerton, CA). The rate of glucose infusion was adjusted according to the plasma glucose concentration using a computer program run on a laptop computer at the bedside.

Substrate utilization

For each subject, VO2 and VCO2 were averaged for each measurement period, and the values were used in subsequent calculations. Glucose and lipid oxidation rates were calculated from the calorimetry data, adjusting for urinary nitrogen output averaged over the entire 10-h study period (15). Negative values for net lipid oxidation were assumed to reflect net lipid synthesis. Glucose storage was assumed to equate with nonoxidative disposal and was calculated each hour by subtracting net glucose oxidation rate, after adjusting for net lipid synthesis, where appropriate (15), from the glucose infusion rate (GIR) for that hour.

Sample collection

Arterialized venous blood samples were taken hourly for measurements of hormone, substrate, and cytokine concentrations. Samples for interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} (TNF{alpha}) assays were taken into EDTA. The sample for glucagon assay was taken into aprotinin (Trasylol, Bayer Corp., Newbury, UK) in lithium heparin, and all other samples were taken into lithium heparin alone. Samples were centrifuged, and the plasma was separated and stored immediately at -20 C, except for glucagon, catecholamine, and cytokine samples, which were stored at -80 C pending analysis.

Biochemical analysis

Substrate concentrations. Plasma glucose and lactate concentrations were measured spectrophotometrically using a Cobas Bio Centrifugal analyzer (Roche, Welwyn Garden City, UK). The plasma free fatty acid (FFA) concentration was also measured spectrophotometrically with a NEFA C kit (Wako Chemicals, Alpha Laboratories, Hampshire UK). Urinary nitrogen content was analyzed using a micro-Kjeldahl technique (Foss Electric, Copenhagen, Denmark). No correction was made for unsensible losses of nitrogen.

Hormones. Commercially available RIA kits were used for the measurement of plasma insulin (Pharmacia Biotech, Milton Keynes, UK), glucagon (Linco Research, Inc., St. Charles, MO), and cortisol (Wallac Oy, Turku, Finland) concentrations. GH concentrations were measured by a two-site immunoenzymometric assay (coefficient of variation, 3.5%). Plasma concentrations of epinephrine and norepinephrine were measured by reverse phase high pressure liquid chromatography and electrochemical detection (16). The MCR for insulin was calculated by dividing the increase above basal in mean steady state plasma insulin concentration between 0–480 min by the rate of insulin infusion (1).

Cytokines. Plasma TNF{alpha} and IL-6 concentrations were both measured by immunoenzymometric assay (Medgenix Europe, Fleurus, Belgium). Detection limits for TNF and IL-6 were 3 and 2 pg/mL, respectively.

Temperature, pulse, and blood pressure measurement

Tympanic membrane temperature was measured at 30-min intervals using an infrared probe (Genius, Sherwood Medical, Crawley, UK). Pulse rate and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were measured automatically every 30 min using an electronic electrocardiographic and sphygmomanometric monitor (Marquette, Milwaukee, WI). In each case the mean of three measurements taken over a 5-min period was used.

Statistical analysis

ANOVA for repeated measures was used to assess time effects and treatment-time interactions (LPS vs. saline). When this revealed a significant treatment-time interaction, post-hoc pairwise comparison between LPS and saline groups was made using Student’s t test with correction for multiple comparisons where appropriate. All calculations were performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences computer software (SPSS, Inc., Chertsey, UK).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subject characteristics

The subjects’ weights did not significantly change between the two studies (72.7 ± 4.9 vs. 72.5 ± 5.2 kg, control vs. LPS, respectively). Mean BSA (1.84 ± 0.06 m2) was identical on the two occasions.

Pulse, blood pressure, and temperature

A single iv dose of LPS produced significant pyrexia in all volunteers (F = 7.0; P < 0.001; 15 df). This was first apparent 120 min after LPS administration (Table 1Go) and peaked with a mean increment of 1.1 ± 0.28 C at 180 min. Subjects remained significantly pyrexial for the remainder of the study period. LPS also induced significant tachycardia (F = 4.1; P < 0.001; 15 df), with a mean peak increment in heart rate of 28.1 ± 4.5 beats/min with a time course similar to that of pyrexia (Table 1Go). MAP fell 270 min after LPS treatment (F = 2.7; P < 0.001; 15 df), with a mean depression of MAP by 10.5 ± 1.1 mm Hg between 360–480 min (Table 1Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Cardiovascular and thermogenic effects of LPS (administered at 0 min) during euglycemic hyperinsulinemia

 
Insulin sensitivity and substrate utilization

The glucose infusion rate (M) varied considerably among individuals, although no significant differences were observed in the same individuals in the two arms of the study before LPS administration. As a result of the basal interindividual variability in insulin sensitivity, changes in M were therefore expressed as the percent change in M from the basal period of -30 to 0 min for each clamp before LPS or saline administration (Fig. 1Go).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Percent change in M from the basal value (-30 to 0 min) in subjects receiving 20 U/kg LPS, iv ({circ}; n = 6), and in saline controls (•; n = 6) at 0 min. All values are the mean ± SE. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01 (LPS vs. control).

 
In the control study, continuation of the clamp beyond 0 min led to a progressive increase in M, reaching a plateau with a mean 35.6 ± 3.2% increase in M from 180 min onward. In contrast, LPS significantly altered M during prolonged glucose clamping (F = 11.6; P < 0.007). An initial 64.1 ± 12.0% increase in M occurred abruptly 120 min after LPS (P < 0.003), and this coincided with the onset of symptoms. This was followed by a progressive reduction in M, indicative of developing insulin resistance. M was significantly reduced compared with that during the control study by 420 min after LPS (P < 0.04), and by 480 min was 12.0 ± 3.4% less than the basal value at 0 min (P < 0.02).

The glucose oxidation rate increased progressively throughout the period of euglycemic hyperinsulinemia (Fig. 2AGo). Although a slightly higher plateau for glucose oxidation rate was observed after LPS (129.0 ± 4.5 mg/m2·min) than in the controls (105.1 ± 5.0 mg/m2·min), the difference narrowly failed to achieve statistical significance (F = 3.5; P = 0.09).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Net glucose oxidation rate (A), glucose storage rate (B), and net lipid oxidation rate (C) in subjects receiving 20 U/kg LPS, iv ({circ}; n = 6), and in saline controls (•; n = 6) at 0 min during euglycemic hyperinsulinemia. All values are the mean ± SE. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01 (LPS vs. control).

 
The differences in M observed after LPS administration were associated with significant alterations in nonoxidative glucose disposal (Fig. 2BGo). In control studies, nonoxidative glucose disposal rose to a plateau of 257.0 ± 13.6 mg/m2·min by 300 min after the start of the euglycemic clamp. LPS administration significantly altered this pattern of glucose disposal (F = 26.2; P < 0.001). The glucose storage rate increased abruptly after LPS compared with that in the control study at 120 min, to 330.9 ± 48.1 mg/m2·min (P < 0.01). The glucose storage rate then declined progressively, until it was significantly less after LPS treatment compared with the control value at 420 min (176.2 ± 56.7 mg/m2·min; P < 0.01) and 480 min (130.5 ± 43.8 mg/m2·min; P < 0.02).

Euglycemic hyperinsulinemia was associated with a progressive reduction in the net lipid oxidation rate after both LPS and saline administration (Fig. 2CGo). By 300 min after the start of the clamp, however, net lipid synthesis had occurred in control studies, whereas after LPS administration, net lipid oxidation continued (F = 2.4; P < 0.05) despite infusion of glucose and insulin. The mean urinary nitrogen output was unaffected by LPS administration (0.6 ± 0.3 vs. 0.5 ± 0.2 g/h, LPS vs. control; P > 0.3).

Hormone, metabolite, and cytokine concentrations

In all studies stable conditions of glycemia and hyperinsulinemia were observed (Table 2Go). Mean plasma glucose concentrations during euglycemic hyperinsulinemia were not significantly affected by the administration of LPS (5.1 mmol/L for both control and LPS), and the stability of glycemia during the studies was indicated by relatively low mean coefficients of variation for both control (7.1%) and LPS studies (9.9%). Mean plasma insulin concentrations (Table 2Go; 979.2 ± 96.6 vs. 907.2 ± 76.8 pmol/L, control vs. LPS) and MCR for insulin (537.0 ± 38.8 vs. 563.8 ± 38.6 mL/min·m2, control vs. LPS) were unaffected by the administration of LPS.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Metabolic effects of LPS (administered at 0 min) during euglycemic hyperinsulinemia

 
The plasma lactate concentration (Table 2Go) did not change significantly in control studies, but a modest rise was observed after LPS (F = 3.15; P < 0.01). This was attributable to a transient, but statistically significant, increase between 300 and 360 min, and lactate concentrations had begun to return to normal by the end of the study.

In contrast, plasma FFA concentrations (Table 2Go) fell rapidly during euglycemic hyperinsulinemia in both control (F = 20.3; P < 0.001) and LPS groups (F = 13.1; P < 0.001) and were below the threshold of assay detection by 240 min. This response was not significantly affected by LPS (F = 0.4; P > 0.9).

LPS produced significant changes in counterregulatory hormone concentrations. The plasma cortisol concentration began to rise 60–120 min after LPS (Fig. 3AGo) and reached a plateau by 240 min (F = 9.42; P < 0.001). Plasma glucagon rose 120 min after LPS (Fig. 3BGo) and reached a plateau by 180 min (F = 2.3; P < 0.05), as did plasma GH (Fig. 3CGo; F = 4.5; P < 0.001). Neither plasma norepinephrine nor epinephrine changed significantly in response to LPS. Although modest increments in the plasma concentration were observed for both catecholamines from 180 min onward, the increases were highly variable and did not reach statistical significance (Table 2Go).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Plasma cortisol (A), glucagon (B), and GH (C) concentrations in subjects receiving 20 U/kg LPS, iv ({circ}; n = 6), and in saline controls (•; n = 6) at 0 min during euglycemic hyperinsulinemia. All values are the mean ± SE. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001 (LPS vs. control).

 
Plasma TNF rose abruptly within 60 min after LPS (Fig. 4AGo) and reached peak concentrations at 120 min, declining slowly thereafter (F = 20.9; P < 0.001). In contrast, the rise of plasma IL-6 was delayed (Fig. 4BGo), beginning 60–120 min after LPS and reaching a peak concentration at 180 min (F = 11.2; P < 0.001).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Plasma TNF{alpha} (A) and IL-6 (B) concentrations in subjects receiving 20 U/kg LPS, iv ({circ}; n = 6), and in saline controls (•; n = 6) at 0 min during euglycemic hyperinsulinemia. All values are the mean ± SE. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001 (LPS vs. control).

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
LPS administration resulted in fever, tachycardia, and stress hormone responses as reported previously (8). A biphasic response in glucose utilization occurred after LPS administration, which contrasted with the previously described progressive rise in GIR after prolonged glucose/insulin infusion (17). The mechanism of the increase in glucose utilization at the onset of symptoms is unclear. Previous studies of humans given LPS have indicated variable effects on plasma glucose with no change in plasma glucose concentration (8), hyperglycemia (9, 18), and hypoglycemia (19) all reported. In the most recent of these studies an abrupt decline in plasma glucose concentrations coincided with the onset of symptoms and was attributed to an increase in both the rate of glucose disappearance from plasma and a decrease in the rate of endogenous glucose production (19). It is difficult to know what the relative contributions of these two changes in glucose metabolism might be, as both would tend to result in a fall in plasma glucose concentration. The results of the present study indicate that under conditions of euglycemic hyperinsulinemia, increased glucose disposal must have been the principal factor responsible for the decline in plasma glucose concentrations, because rates of endogenous glucose production would already have been maximally suppressed by the infusion of glucose and insulin before LPS (20).

Animal studies have also shown that LPS produces an increase in glucose disposal without a significant change in endogenous glucose production, provided euglycemia is maintained by exogenous glucose infusion (21). It seems unlikely that changes in glucose utilization in the present study could be attributed entirely to the hemodynamic effect of LPS. Although the late decline in the glucose infusion rate might be explicable by a reduction in skeletal muscle blood flow associated with the decline in MAP, the minor hemodynamic alterations in the first 2 h of the period after LPS administration seem unlikely to explain the increased glucose utilization. Although more invasive cardiovascular monitoring may have clarified the relationship between hemodynamic responses and changes in glucose utilization, previous human studies using invasive monitoring have failed to demonstrate significant changes in lower extremity blood flow using the same model (9). The initial increase in the glucose infusion rate could indicate an increase in insulin sensitivity, a direct insulin-like action of LPS, the release of other factors with insulin-like effects such as insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), or activation of noninsulin-mediated glucose uptake. The failure of glucose oxidation to increase at the same time as GIR suggests that the additional glucose consumed in association with the increased GIR was not oxidized, but was, instead, stored as glycogen or processed by anaerobic glycolysis. Although it has been suggested as a result of animal (22) and in vitro studies (12) that LPS might have direct insulin-like effects, it seems unlikely that LPS would possess sufficient insulin-like activity to exceed that of the high rate of insulin infusion used in the present study. In addition, studies in which LPS has been administered without glucose and insulin infusion have only demonstrated transient and mild hypoglycemia (19). Although other molecules, such as IGF-I, also exert insulin-like effects, LPS has been shown to reduce plasma IGF-I concentrations (23), which does not support a role for IGF-I in this response.

Stimulation of noninsulin-mediated glucose uptake might provide an alternative explanation for the increase in GIR at the onset of constitutional symptoms. The increase in GIR in the present study coincided with the appearance of TNF in plasma, and TNF has been shown to directly increase noninsulin-stimulated basal glucose uptake in vivo (24, 25) and in vitro (26). The effect of LPS on basal glucose uptake was not measured in the present study, but an abrupt increase in noninsulin-mediated glucose uptake could have accounted for the early increase in GIR. Although the majority of glucose infused iv is taken up into skeletal muscle (27), it is unclear whether this is true of the increased GIR seen in the present study in which euglycemia was maintained, as animal studies have shown that hyperglycemia is required for the LPS-induced increase in basal glucose uptake in skeletal muscle (28). As the increased GIR occurred at a time of initiation of the inflammatory response, it is possible that an increase in glucose uptake, channeled into anaerobic glycolysis within the reticuloendothelial system, might account for the enhanced nonoxidative glucose disposal. Animal studies have indicated that LPS induces an increase in glucose uptake principally in macrophage-rich tissues such as spleen and gut (21). The failure of plasma lactate concentrations to increase substantially at this time point does not exclude this hypothesis, as lactate clearance might have increased simultaneously, as has been recently shown in sepsis (29).

Although the length of time that patients remain insulin resistant has been studied after infection (30) and surgery (14), no data are available concerning the onset of insulin resistance in human infection, chiefly because of the unpredictable clinical course of human sepsis. The data presented here are somewhat at variance with reported findings in animals. In the present study insulin resistance was only clearly demonstrable 7 h after LPS administration, whereas animal studies have demonstrated insulin resistance within 3–5 h (10, 31). The reasons for these differences are unclear, but it should be noted that the dose of LPS used in animal studies has been much greater than that used in the present study (10, 21, 31). In addition, we administered LPS after 120 min of euglycemic hyperinsulinemia, whereas previous studies have treated fasted animals with LPS and commenced the clamp subsequently (10, 31). As postoperative insulin resistance can be attenuated by intraoperative glucose/insulin infusion (32), it is possible that the period of euglycemic hyperinsulinemia before LPS might have attenuated or delayed the development of insulin resistance.

The mechanisms of the insulin resistance in the present study are unclear. TNF infusion induces insulin resistance in rodents by impairing insulin-mediated glucose disposal (24), and there has been recent evidence to suggest a role for TNF as a mediator of insulin resistance in obesity and diabetes (33). Although in the present study plasma concentrations of TNF and IL-6 were elevated for significantly longer than has previously been reported after LPS treatment (8, 23) and were still significantly elevated when insulin resistance developed, this does not necessarily imply a causal relationship, and peak plasma concentrations of both proinflammatory cytokines did not correlate with either absolute or percent reductions in glucose utilization (data not shown). Furthermore, anti-TNF antibodies have not been shown to prevent LPS-induced changes in glucose metabolism in rats (34), and it is unclear whether IL-6 infusion can induce insulin resistance in man (35).

LPS administration induced significant increases in plasma cortisol and GH concentrations, confirming previous reports (9, 18). Although it has previously been stated that counterregulatory hormones cannot explain the changes in basal glucose metabolism associated with sepsis because their onset of action is too slow (10), the relatively long time course of the onset of insulin resistance in the present study does not rule out a role for cortisol and/or GH. Insulin resistance developed in this study within 6 h of considerably lower endogenous plasma levels of cortisol and glucagon than those shown to induce insulin resistance after exogenous administration for 72 h (13). The plasma cortisol levels observed after LPS in the present study are broadly comparable with those observed in insulin-resistant septic patients (3) and were maintained for at least 6 h. It has been shown that similar levels of plasma cortisol can induce insulin resistance in healthy humans over this time period (36). In addition, mean plasma GH concentrations were above the levels shown to maximally induce insulin resistance (50 mU/L) after 4 h when GH is infused alone (37).

The presence of a glucagon response to LPS was unexpected, because previous studies have failed to demonstrate LPS-induced glucagon release (9, 18). In both of these earlier studies, however, the plasma glucose concentration was not controlled, and mild, but significant, hyperglycemia had occurred by 3 h, suggesting that hyperglycemia in the previous studies might have suppressed the glucagon response to LPS. This is in agreement with the results of a study in which a lethal dose of LPS was shown to induce marked hyperglucagonemia in rodents provided that euglycemia was maintained (21) and is also supported by the demonstration that sepsis-induced hyperglucagonemia can be suppressed by hyperglycemia during prolonged glucose infusion (3, 38). Although glucagon stimulates endogenous glucose production, it is unclear to what extent the glucagon response in the present study contributed to the observed insulin resistance. The level of hyperglucagonemia was modest compared with that recently reported in septic patients, in whom skeletal muscle, rather than hepatic insulin resistance, was observed (3), and LPS reduced hepatocyte responsiveness to glucagon in vitro (39).

In the present study the rates of endogenous glucose production were not measured because of the extremely long study protocol. For this reason, the insulin resistance observed cannot wholly be attributed to impaired storage in skeletal muscle as opposed to increased hepatic endogenous glucose production. It should be emphasized, however, that the levels of hyperinsulinemia achieved in this study have previously been shown to maximally suppress hepatic glucose output even in septic animals, with a 2-fold increase in basal glucose production (40). Animal studies have also indicated that LPS does not prevent insulin-mediated suppression of endogenous glucose production at plasma insulin concentrations considerably lower than those reported in the present study (41), and the rate of glucose appearance has been shown to remain low after LPS administration in man, even in the absence of insulin infusion (19). It thus appears likely that the reduction in GIR observed during the period of insulin resistance at the end of the study was attributable to skeletal muscle as opposed to hepatic insulin resistance. In addition, the failure to demonstrate any defect of glucose oxidation in association with the fall in glucose utilization confirms recent reports of selective impairment of glucose storage as the underlying cause of insulin resistance in sepsis (3, 42).

Increased fatty acid availability has been linked to insulin resistance (43), and LPS administration in man has been shown to increase lipolysis and plasma FFA concentrations (9, 19). The findings of the present study strongly suggest, however, that FFA did not contribute to the observed insulin resistance, as the suppression of lipolysis and resulting low plasma FFA concentrations were not reversed by LPS despite the development of insulin resistance.

In summary, LPS administration in man results in a biphasic response of glucose metabolism, with an initial, possibly cytokine-mediated, transient increase in glucose utilization, followed by the development of insulin resistance. The time course of insulin resistance implies that it arises secondarily to the counterregulatory hormone response. Further studies using this human model of sepsis may be able to address this issue.

Received November 11, 1999.

Revised April 21, 2000.

Accepted June 6, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Black PR, Brooks DC, Bessey PQ, Wolfe RR, Wilmore DW. 1982 Mechanisms of insulin resistance following injury. Ann Surg. 196:420–35.[Medline]
  2. White RH, Frayn KN, Little RA, Threlfall CJ, Stoner HB, Irving MH. 1987 Hormonal and metabolic responses to glucose infusion in sepsis studied by the hyperglycaemic glucose clamp technique. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 11:345–353.[Abstract]
  3. Saeed M, Carlson GL, Little RA, Irving MH. 1999 Selective impairment of glucose storage in human sepsis. Br J Surg. 86:813–821.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Fink RI, Kolterman OG, Griffin J, Olefsky JM. 1983 Mechanisms of insulin resistance in aging. J Clin Invest. 71:1523–1535.
  5. Argiles JM, Alvarez B, Lopez-Soriano FJ. 1997 The metabolic basis of cancer cachexia. Med Res Rev. 17:477–498.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Nygren J, Thorell A, Efendic S, Nair KS, Ljungqvist O. 1997 Site of insulin resistance after surgery: the contribution of hypocaloric nutrition and bed rest. Clin Sci Colch. 93:137–146.[Medline]
  7. Chan JC, Cockram CS, Critchley JA. 1996 Drug-induced disorders of glucose metabolism. Mechanisms and management. Drug Saf. 15:135–157.[Medline]
  8. Michie HR, Manogue KR, Spriggs DR, et al. 1988 Detection of circulating tumor necrosis factor after endotoxin administration. N Engl J Med. 318:1481–1486.[Abstract]
  9. Fong Y, Marano MA, Moldawer LL, et al. 1990 The acute splanchnic and peripheral tissue metabolic response to endotoxin in humans. J Clin Invest. 85:1896–1904.
  10. Virkamaki A, Yki-Jarvinen H. 1994 Mechanisms of insulin resistance during acute endotoxaemia. Endocrinology. 134:2072–2078.[Abstract]
  11. Yelich MR, Filkins JP. 1982 Insulin hypersecretion and potentiation of endotoxin shock in the rat. Circ Shock. 9:589–603.[Medline]
  12. Witek-Janusek L, Filkins JP. 1981 Insulin-like action of endotoxin: antagonism by steroidal and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents. Circ Shock. 8:573–583.[Medline]
  13. Bessey PQ, Watters JM, Aoki TT, Wilmore DW. 1984 Combined hormonal infusion simulates the metabolic response to injury. Ann Surg. 200:264–281.[Medline]
  14. Thorell A, Efendic S, Gutniak M, Haggmark T, Ljungqvist O. 1994 Insulin resistance after abdominal surgery. Br J Surg. 81:59–63.[Medline]
  15. Frayn KN. 1983 Calculation of substrate oxidation rates in vivo from gaseous exchange. J Appl Physiol. 55:628–634.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Maycock PF, Frayn KN. 1987 Use of alumina columns to prepare plasma samples for liquid chromatographic determination of catecholamines. Clin Chem. 33:286–287.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Doberne L, Greenfield MS, Schulz B, Reaven G. 1981 Enhanced glucose utilization during prolonged glucose clamp studies. Diabetes. 30:829–835.[Medline]
  18. Revhaug A, Michie HR, Manson JM, et al. 1988 Inhibition of cyclo-oxygenase attenuates the metabolic response to endotoxin in humans. Arch Surg. 123:162–170.[Abstract]
  19. Bloesch D, Keller U, Spinas GA, Kury D, Girard J, Stauffacher W. 1993 Effects of endotoxin on leucine and glucose kinetics in man: contribution of prostaglandin E2 assessed by a cyclooxygenase inhibitor. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 77:1156–1163.[Abstract]
  20. Wolfe RR, Allsop JR, Burke JF. 1979 Glucose metabolism in man: responses to intravenous glucose infusion. Metabolism. 8:210–220.
  21. Lang CH, Spolarics Z, Ottlakan A, Spitzer JJ. 1993 Effect of high-dose endotoxin on glucose production and utilization. Metabolism. 42:1351–1358.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Filkins JP. 1982 Role of the RES in the pathogenesis of endotoxic hypoglycaemia. Circ Shock. 9:269–280.[Medline]
  23. Lang CH, Pollard V, Fan J, et al. 1997 Acute alterations in growth hormone-insulin-like growth factor axis in humans injected with endotoxin. Am J Physiol. 273:R371–R378.
  24. Lang CH, Dobrescu C, Bagby GJ. 1992 Tumor necrosis factor impairs insulin action on peripheral glucose disposal and hepatic glucose output. Endocrinology. 130:43–52.[Abstract]
  25. Sakurai Y, Zhang X-J, Wolfe RR. 1996 TNF directly stimulates glucose uptake and leucine oxidation and inhibits FFA flux in conscious dogs. Am J Physiol. 270:E864–E872.
  26. Bedard S, Marcotte B, Marette A. 1997 Cytokines modulate glucose transport in skeletal muscle by inducing the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase. Biochem J. 325:487–493.
  27. DeFronzo RA, Jacot E, Jequier E, Maeder E, Wahren J, Felber JP. 1981 The effect of insulin upon the disposal of intravenous glucose. Results from indirect calorimetry and hepatic and femoral venous catheterisation. Diabetes. 30:1000–1007.[Medline]
  28. Lang CH. 1995 Neural regulation of the enhanced uptake of glucose in skeletal muscle after endotoxin. Am J Physiol. 269:R437–R444.
  29. Levraut J, Ciebiera J-P, Chave S, et al. 1998 Mild hyperlactatemia in stable septic patients is due to impaired lactate clearance rather than overproduction. Am J Resp Crit Care Med. 157:1021–1026.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Virkamaki A, Puhakainen I, Koivisto VA, Vuorinen-Markkola H, Yki-Jarvinen H. 1992 Mechanisms of hepatic and peripheral insulin resistance during acute infections in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 74:673–679.[Abstract]
  31. Virkamaki A, Yki-Jarvinen H. 1995 Role of prostaglandins in mediating alterations in glucose metabolism during acute endotoxaemia in the rat. Endocrinology. 136:1701–1706.[Abstract]
  32. Nygren JO, Thorell A, Soop M, et al. 1998 Perioperative insulin and glucose infusion maintains normal insulin sensitivity after surgery. Am J Physiol. 275:E140—E148.
  33. Uysal KT, Wiesbrock SM, Marino MW, Hotamisligil GS. 1997 Protection from obesity-induced insulin resistance in mice lacking TNF-{alpha} function. Nature. 389:610–614.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Bagby GJ, Lang CH, Skrepnik N, Golightly G, Spitzer JJ. 1993 Regulation of glucose metabolism after endotoxin and during infection is largely independent of endogenous tumor necrosis factor. Circ Shock. 39:211–219.[Medline]
  35. Stouthard JML, Romijn JA, Van der Poll T, et al. 1995 Endocrinologic and metabolic effects of interleukin-6 in humans. Am J Physiol. 268:E813–E819.
  36. Fowelin J, Attvall S, Von Schenck H, Smith U, Lager I. 1989 Combined effect of growth hormone and cortisol on late posthypoglycemic insulin resistance in humans. Diabetes. 38:1357–1364.[Abstract]
  37. Fowelin J, Attvall S, von Schenck H, Smith U, Lager I. 1991 Characterization of the insulin-antagonistic effect of growth hormone in man. Diabetologia. 34:500–506.[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Carlson GL, Gray P, Arnold J, Little RA, Irving MH. 1997 Thermogenic, hormonal and metabolic effects of intravenous glucose infusion in human sepsis. Br J Surg. 84:1454–1459.[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Knowles RG, McCabe JP, Beevers SJ, Pogson CI. 1987 The characteristics and site of inhibition of gluconeogenesis in rat liver cells by bacterial endotoxin. Stimulation of phosphofructokinase-1. Biochem J. 242:721–78.[Medline]
  40. Lang CH, Dobrescu C. 1989 In vivo insulin resistance during nonlethal hypermetabolic sepsis. Circ Shock. 28:165–178.[Medline]
  41. Ling PR, Bistrian BR, Mendez B, Istfan NW. 1994 Effects of systemic infusions of endotoxin, tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-1 on glucose metabolism in the rat: relationship to endogenous glucose production and peripheral tissue glucose uptake. Metabolism. 43:279–284.[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Green CJ, Campbell IT, O’Sullivan E, et al. 1995 Septic patients in multiple organ failure can oxidize infused glucose but non-oxidative disposal (storage) is impaired. Clinical Science. 89:601–609.[Medline]
  43. Randle PJ, Garland PB, Hales CN, Newsholme EA. 1963 The glucose fatty acid cycle, its role in insulin sensitivity and the metabolic disturbances of diabetes mellitus. Lancet. 1:787–788.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
W. A. Banks, S. Dohgu, J. L. Lynch, M. A. Fleegal-DeMotta, M. A. Erickson, R. Nakaoke, and T. Q. Vo
Nitric Oxide Isoenzymes Regulate Lipopolysaccharide-Enhanced Insulin Transport across the Blood-Brain Barrier
Endocrinology, April 1, 2008; 149(4): 1514 - 1523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. O. Badellino, M. L. Wolfe, M. P. Reilly, and D. J. Rader
Endothelial Lipase Is Increased In Vivo by Inflammation in Humans
Circulation, February 5, 2008; 117(5): 678 - 685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Innate ImmunityHome page
M. Bahador and A. S. Cross
Review: From therapy to experimental model: a hundred years of endotoxin administration to human subjects
Innate Immunity, October 1, 2007; 13(5): 251 - 279.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
G. Vila, C. Maier, M. Riedl, P. Nowotny, B. Ludvik, A. Luger, and M. Clodi
Bacterial Endotoxin Induces Biphasic Changes in Plasma Ghrelin in Healthy Humans
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2007; 92(10): 3930 - 3934.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
P. D. Anderson, N. N. Mehta, M. L. Wolfe, C. C. Hinkle, L. Pruscino, L. L. Comiskey, J. Tabita-Martinez, K. F. Sellers, M. R. Rickels, R. S. Ahima, et al.
Innate Immunity Modulates Adipokines in Humans
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2007; 92(6): 2272 - 2279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. A. Orellana, S. R. Kimball, A. Suryawan, J. Escobar, H. V. Nguyen, L. S. Jefferson, and T. A. Davis
Insulin stimulates muscle protein synthesis in neonates during endotoxemia despite repression of translation initiation
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, February 1, 2007; 292(2): E629 - E636.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. del Rey, E. Roggero, A. Randolf, C. Mahuad, S. McCann, V. Rettori, and H. O. Besedovsky
IL-1 resets glucose homeostasis at central levels
PNAS, October 24, 2006; 103(43): 16039 - 16044.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. A. Orellana, P. M. J. O'Connor, J. A. Bush, A. Suryawan, M. C. Thivierge, H. V. Nguyen, M. L. Fiorotto, and T. A. Davis
Modulation of muscle protein synthesis by insulin is maintained during neonatal endotoxemia
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, July 1, 2006; 291(1): E159 - E166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. P. Reilly, M. Lehrke, M. L. Wolfe, A. Rohatgi, M. A. Lazar, and D. J. Rader
Resistin Is an Inflammatory Marker of Atherosclerosis in Humans
Circulation, February 22, 2005; 111(7): 932 - 939.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
M. A. Lazar
How Obesity Causes Diabetes: Not a Tall Tale
Science, January 21, 2005; 307(5708): 373 - 375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. G. Jeschke, D. Klein, U. Bolder, and R. Einspanier
Insulin Attenuates the Systemic Inflammatory Response in Endotoxemic Rats
Endocrinology, September 1, 2004; 145(9): 4084 - 4093.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
P. Dandona, A. Aljada, A. Chaudhuri, and A. Bandyopadhyay
The Potential Influence of Inflammation and Insulin Resistance on the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Atherosclerosis-Related Complications in Type 2 Diabetes
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2003; 88(6): 2422 - 2429.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. A. Orellana, P. M. J. O'Connor, H. V. Nguyen, J. A. Bush, A. Suryawan, M. C. Thivierge, M. L. Fiorotto, and T. A. Davis
Endotoxemia reduces skeletal muscle protein synthesis in neonates
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, November 1, 2002; 283(5): E909 - E916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Soop, H. Duxbury, A. O Agwunobi, J. M. Gibson, S. J. Hopkins, C. Childs, R. G. Cooper, P. Maycock, R. A. Little, and G. L. Carlson
Euglycemic hyperinsulinemia augments the cytokine and endocrine responses to endotoxin in humans
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, June 1, 2002; 282(6): E1276 - E1285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Agwunobi, A. O.
Right arrow Articles by Carlson, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Agwunobi, A. O.
Right arrow Articles by Carlson, G. L.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals