help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dökmetas, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by Bayram, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dökmetas, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by Bayram, F.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 85, No. 10 3713-3719
Copyright © 2000 by The Endocrine Society


Original Studies

A Comparison between the 1-µg Adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) Test, the Short ACTH (250 µg) Test, and the Insulin Tolerance Test in the Assessment of Hypothalamo-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis Immediately after Pituitary Surgery

Hatice Sebila Dökmetas, Ramiz Çolak, Fahrettin Kelestimur, Ahmet Selçuklu, Kürsat Ünlühizarci and Fahri Bayram

Departments of Endocrinology (H.S.D., R.C., F.K., K.U., F.B.) and Neurosurgery (A.S.), Erciyes University, Medical School, 38039 Kayseri, Turkey

Address correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Fahrettin Kelestimur, Department of Endocrinology, Erciyes Üniversitesi, Tip Fakültesi, 38039 Kayseri, Turkey.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The short ACTH stimulation test is an easy, reliable, and extensively used test in the assessment of the hypothalamo-pituitary- adrenal (HPA) axis. However, its use immediately after pituitary surgery is a matter of debate. The insulin tolerance test (ITT) is the gold standard in the evaluation of the HPA axis, but it is not always without side effects and may be unpleasant early after pituitary surgery. Our aim was to investigate the value of the 1-µg ACTH test in the assessment of the HPA axis early after pituitary surgery. We also aimed to determine the value of the 1-µg and 250-µg ACTH tests and the ITT in the estimation of HPA axis status after 3 months postoperatively. Nineteen patients subjected to pituitary tumor surgery were included in the study, and the ITT and the 1-µg and 250-µg ACTH tests were performed between the 4th and 11th days of surgery. The tests were repeated at the first month in 3 patients with subnormal peak cortisol responses (454, 125, and 301 nmol/L) and in 18 patients at the third month postoperatively. ACTH stimulation tests were performed by using 1 µg and 250 µg ACTH iv as a bolus injection, and blood samples were drawn at 0, 30, and 60 min for measurement of serum cortisol levels. The ITT was performed by using iv regular insulin, and serum glucose and cortisol levels were measured. The 1-µg and 250-µg ACTH stimulation tests and the ITT were performed consecutively. At least 48 h were allowed between each test. A peak serum cortisol level of 550 nmol/L or greater was considered as a normal response for both the ITT and the ACTH tests. The serum cortisol level was measured by RIA using commercial kits. Serum glucose was determined by glucose oxidase method. There were correlations between the peak cortisol response to the ITT and the 1-µg ACTH test (r = 0.39, P < 0.05) in the early postoperative period. No correlation was found between the ITT and the 250-µg ACTH test responses. In the early postoperative period, two patients showed normal cortisol responses (>=550 nmol/L) to the 1-µg ACTH test and five patients showed normal cortisol responses to the 250-µg ACTH test among the six patients with subnormal cortisol responses to the ITT. Three patients with subnormal cortisol responses to ITT and baseline cortisol values less than 240 nmol/L showed normal HPA axis at the end of the first month. In the late postoperative period, at the third month, all the patients showed normal HPA axis.

In the early postoperative period of pituitary surgery, the 1-µg ACTH test results are more concordant than the 250-µg ACTH test in comparison with the ITT. Our results also indicate that HPA axis dysfunction shown by ACTH stimulation tests and the ITT in early postoperative period may be normalized 1–3 months after surgery. For this reason, we think that dynamic tests including the ITT may not be useful early after pituitary surgery.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
PITUITARY ADENOMAS, especially macroadenomas, may result in hypopituitarism either directly by the pressure on the adjacent pituitary gland or indirectly by the compression of the pituitary stalk or hypothalamus leading to an impaired flow of releasing factors (1). Pituitary function may be compromised by surgical trauma in patients undergoing pituitary adenomectomy (2). On the other hand, among patients who displayed hypopituitarism preoperatively, surgical decompression may provide recovery of pituitary hormone deficiencies (2, 3, 4). Establishment of the secretory reserve of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and the need for glucocorticoid replacement in the early postoperative period before discharge from the hospital may be very important. If HPA axis dysfunction due to corticotroph cell damage is not determined in these patients, acute adrenal insufficiency may not be recognized (5, 6). However, corticotrophin deficiency determined in the early postoperative period may be transient (7, 8, 9).

After pituitary adenomectomy, the most widely applied tests for evaluation of HPA axis are morning cortisol measurements, the insulin tolerance test (ITT), the short ACTH stimulation test (SAT), the metyrapone test, and CRH stimulation tests (6, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14). Among those tests, the ITT has been widely accepted as the gold standard for the assessment of HPA axis (6, 15). However, it is unpleasant and is not without risk (16). The metyrapone test evaluates negative feedback of cortisol on the pituitary gland, but it does not assess the cortisol response to stress (6, 17). Additionally, this test requires 11-deoxycortisol determinations, which are not available in most laboratories, and the drug is not available in all countries. The CRH test procedure has not been well standardized, and its value in differentiating hypothalamic from pituitary causes of ACTH failure is unclear (15). It has been suggested that the SAT, which is simple, easy, and an inexpensive method, may be used to assess the HPA axis instead of the ITT (18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24). However, it has been reported that the SAT may induce false positive cortisol responses shortly after pituitary surgery (6, 10, 14, 21, 25, 26, 27).

Recently, it has been suggested that using a supraphysiological dose of exogenous ACTH (250 µg) may cause false positive responses due to maximal stimulation of the adrenal cortex, and the test should be done by using lower doses of ACTH (26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31). Although there are some studies using low-dose ACTH in a variety of patients (26, 27, 28, 32, 33, 34), we could not find a systematic prospective study that investigated the HPA axis at early postoperative period using the 1-µg and 250-µg ACTH stimulation tests and the ITT.

Three important questions should be answered in the patients undergoing pituitary surgery: 1) is there corticotroph cell damage? 2) which of the ACTH stimulation tests, the 1 µg or the 250 µg, is reliable and can be performed to evaluate the functional capacity of the HPA axis early after surgery? 3) is the dysfunction of the HPA axis, determined in the early postoperative period, persistent or not?

In this study, our aim was to find the answers to these questions. We have carried out a prospective comparative study assessing morning serum cortisol and the serum cortisol responses to the ITT and the 1-µg and 250-µg ACTH tests within the 4th–11th days and at the third month of pituitary surgery.


    Patients and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients

Nineteen patients (11 men and 8 women; age, 24–69 yr; mean age, 51.4 ± 2.9 yr) who underwent pituitary surgery (transsphenoidal surgery in 17 patients and transcranial surgery in 2 patients) were included in the study (Table 1Go). Local Ethical Committee approval had been obtained before the commencement of the study, and informed consent was obtained from each patient. All patients had baseline pituitary hormone levels, and the ITT was performed in all the patients in the preoperative period. Patients with Cushing’s syndrome were excluded. Nine patients had hypothyroidism, five patients had hypogonadism, and all were receiving appropriate replacement therapy.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Details of patients

 
None of the patients was on glucocorticoid replacement therapy. For the prevention of secondary adrenal failure, prednisolone was given 25 mg im before anesthesia induction and 25 mg im on the second postoperative day. Morning serum cortisol measurement was determined within 4–7 days, and the 1-µg and 250-µg ACTH stimulation tests and the ITT were performed consecutively at the 4th–11th days after pituitary surgery in patients who did not receive prednisolone on the postoperative third day. At least 48 h were allowed between each test. The baseline pituitary hormone levels were detected in all patients postoperatively.

None of the patients received glucocorticoid replacement therapy after discharge and at the first, second, and third month after surgery. Serum electrolytes, blood pressure, and physical examination were monitored to ascertain HPA axis status, and basal cortisol measurement was repeated when it was clinically indicated. Additionally, the 1-µg and 250-µg ACTH stimulation tests and the ITT were performed in 3 patients characterized by subnormal cortisol responses and subnormal baseline cortisol levels at the end of the first month and in 18 patients at the end of the third month.

Study protocol

A 250 µg tetracosactrin (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24) (Synacthen; Novartis Pharma GmbH, Nürnberg, Germany) dose was diluted in sterile saline solution to a concentration of 5 µg/mL in plastic tubes and kept at 4 C maximally for 4 months. Further dilution (1 µg) was performed by taking 0.2 mL of this solution and adding 0.8 mL saline solution and immediately was used to the patient iv (31).

ACTH stimulation tests were performed by using 1 µg and 250 µg ACTH iv as a bolus injection after an overnight fast, and blood samples were drawn at 0, 30, and 60 min (16, 28). After an overnight fast, the ITT was performed by using iv regular insulin (0.1–0.2 U/kg), and serum glucose and serum cortisol levels were measured before and after 30, 60, and 90 min. All patients had serum glucose level less than 2.2 nmol/L during the ITT. No adverse effects were seen during the tests. Peak serum cortisol levels of 550 nmol/L or greater were considered as a normal response for both the ITT and the ACTH tests.

Assays

Serum cortisol levels were determined by RIA using a commercially available kit (ICN Biomedicals, Inc., Costa Mesa, CA). This procedure has an intra-assay and interassay coefficient of variation between 5–7%, and 6–7.9%, respectively. Its sensitivity was 4.13 nmol/L. Serum glucose was determined by glucose oxidase method on a Technicon RAXT otoanalyzer (Dublin, Ireland).

Statistical analysis

Kruskal Wallis ANOVA was performed for multiple comparison. This test was followed by Mann-Whitney U test to compare the two groups. Correlations were determined by linear regression analysis. The data are expressed as mean ± SEM. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The results of the patients during three tests are summarized in Table 2Go and Figs. 1Go and 2Go. Both insulin-like growth factor I levels and GH responses to oral glucose tolerance tests were normalized at the third month postoperatively in seven of the nine patients with acromegaly. Four of the five patients with prolactinoma had normal serum PRL levels postoperatively. Five patients had diabetes insipidus, 10 patients had secondary hypothyroidism, 3 patients had secondary hypogonadism, and all received appropriate replacement therapies.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Mean cortisol responses (nmol/L) to ITT and 1-µg and 250-µg ACTH tests in the preoperative, early, and late postoperative periods

 


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Mean cortisol responses to the ITT and the 1-µg and 250-µg ACTH tests in the early postoperative period.

 


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Mean cortisol responses to the ITT and the 1-µg and 250-µg ACTH tests in the late postoperative period.

 
Preoperative peak cortisol responses to the ITT were similar to the results obtained in the early and late postoperative periods (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences between the mean baseline serum cortisol levels (nmol/L) on preoperative (506.2 ± 65.9), on postoperative days 4–7 (515.9 ± 63.1), or at the third month (520.9 ± 51.3) (P > 0.05). Peak cortisol responses to three tests and mean baseline cortisol values were similar (P > 0.05) in the early postoperative periods.

In the early postoperative period there was a significant correlation between the peak cortisol values of the ITT and the 1-µg ACTH test (r = 0.39, P < 0.05), but no correlation was found between the ITT and the 250-µg ACTH test (r = 0.22, P > 0.05). There was a correlation between morning serum cortisol values and peak cortisol responses to the ITT in the preoperative (r = 0.48, P < 0.01) and postoperative periods (r = 0.39, P < 0.05).

One month after surgery, the ITT and the 1- and 250-µg ACTH tests were performed in patients (patients 1, 2, and 3) with low baseline cortisol levels (<240 nmol/L) and subnormal cortisol responses to the ITT. Peak cortisol responses to three tests were more than 550 nmol/L (Table 3Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Peak cortisol responses (nmol/L) to tests at the end of first month in patients with subnormal responses to the ITT

 
One of 19 patients showed subnormal cortisol responses to each test, 13 of 19 showed normal cortisol responses, and 6 patients showed inadequate responses to the ITT in the early postoperative period. Four of six patients with inadequate responses to the ITT had subnormal responses to 1 µg ACTH, but five of six patients showed normal responses to the 250-µg ACTH test (Table 4Go). The sensitivity and specificity of the 1- and 250-µg ACTH tests compared with the ITT were 100% and 66% for the 1-µg ACTH test and 100% and 17% for the 250-µg ACTH test, respectively. The combined discrepancy between the ITT and the 1-µg ACTH test was 10.5% (2 of 19 patients), whereas it was 26.3% (5 of 19) between the ITT and the 250-µg ACTH stimulation test. Figures 3Go and 4Go show concordant results (normal or subnormal peak cortisol responses in both tests) and discrepant results (subnormal peak cortisol response to the 1- or 250-µg ACTH test, but normal in the ITT, conversely) in the early postoperative period and late postoperative period, respectively.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Baseline cortisol values (nmol/L) and cortisol responses to the ITT and the 1-µg and 250-µg ACTH tests

 


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Peak cortisol responses to ITT compared with peak cortisol responses to the 1- and 250-µg ACTH tests early postoperatively showing concordant or discrepant results.

 


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Peak cortisol responses to ITT compared with peak cortisol responses to the 1- and 250-µg ACTH tests late postoperatively showing concordant or discrepant results.

 
If we would have used 500 nmol/L as the cut-off value for peak cortisol responses, four patients would have had abnormal cortisol responses to the ITT. Three of the four patients would have had abnormal cortisol responses to the 1-µg ACTH test, and one would have had abnormal cortisol responses to the 250-µg ACTH test. The combined discrepancy between the ITT and the 1-µg ACTH test would have been 5.2% (1 of 19 patients), and it would have been 15.2% (3 of 19) between the ITT and the 250-µg ACTH test.

If we would have used 600 nmol/L as the cut-off value for peak cortisol responses, six patients would have had abnormal cortisol responses to the ITT. Four of the six patients would have had abnormal cortisol responses to the 1-µg ACTH test, and one would have abnormal cortisol responses to the 250-µg ACTH test. The combined discrepancy between the ITT and the 1-µg ACTH test would be 10.5% (2 of 19 patients), and it would have been 26.3% (5 of 19) between the ITT and the 250-µg ACTH test.

All the patients evaluated at the third month showed peak cortisol responses of 500 nmol/L (18 µg/dL), and 17 patients showed peak cortisol responses of 550 nmol/L (20 µg/dL). The second patient had a peak cortisol response of 523 nmol/L after the 1-µg ACTH test but more than 550 nmol/L after the 250-µg ACTH test and the ITT.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
It is essential to assess reliably the functional secretory capacity of the HPA axis in patients undergoing pituitary surgery, but the mode of evaluation of the HPA axis remains controversial (8, 11, 13, 14, 26, 27, 35). Although the ITT has been widely accepted as a gold standard for the assessment of the entire HPA axis, it may cause serious complications in the elderly; patients with cardiac diseases, epilepsy, or hypothyroidism without treatment; and requires close medical supervision (6, 16). It has been suggested that the SAT may be used instead of the ITT to evaluate the HPA axis (19, 22, 23, 24). Hurel et al. (23) compared the results of the SAT and the ITT retrospectively in 166 patients with pituitary adenomas and suggested that using a 30-min cortisol response higher than 600 nmol/L (22 µg/dL) as a cut-off value the SAT provides a convenient alternative for the ITT.

Ammari et al. (36) evaluated the HPA axis by using the ITT and standard SAT in 30 patients with different hypothalamic pituitary pathology and reported that 9 of 17 patients with abnormal ITT results (<550 nmol/L) (20 µg/dL) had higher than this value in the SAT (discordant results were 53%). Similarly, Rasmuson et al. (27) determined that 4 of 16 patients with subnormal cortisol responses to the ITT had higher than 550 nmol/L (20 µg/dL) cortisol response to the 250-µg ACTH test in patients with verified or suspected hypothalamic-pituitary disorders and on long-term glucocorticoid therapy. In another study performed after 6 weeks after pituitary surgery, it has been shown that the SAT has poor diagnostic use and may be misleading if used as a screening test (35).

Recently, as partially shown in this study, 21 patients with pituitary adenomas were evaluated for functional reserve of HPA axis within 2 weeks after pituitary surgery by using the ITT or glucagon test and standard SAT, and total discrepancies were found as 24% between the tests (14).

In this study, five of six patients with subnormal cortisol responses (<550 nmol/L) (20 µg/dL) to the ITT had cortisol values higher than 550 nmol/L (20 µg/dL) in the early postoperative period after the SAT. In the early postoperative period, the total discrepancy was 26.3% (5 of 19) between the SAT and the ITT. We want to indicate that normal adrenals may still respond to a pharmacologic dose of 250 µg even when pituitary function is impaired acutely, so standard SAT is not a reliable screening test for the assessment of HPA axis just after pituitary surgery.

Some investigators suggested that those discordant results between the SAT and the ITT may be formed because of supraphysiological doses of ACTH (26, 27). The standard doses of ACTH used in the SAT is at least 1000 times higher for maximal adrenal stimulation (37) and it is unreliable until sufficient time has elapsed to allow the development of atrophy due to ACTH deficiency. Daidoh et al. (30) determined that the minimal dose of ACTH inducing peak and incremental cortisol values equivalent to those obtained with 250 µg ACTH is 0.5 µg ACTH in an iv dose-response study with normal subjects. However, 1 µg ACTH is probably the lowest physiological ACTH dose that will produce a maximal cortisol (38). Although the 1-µg test is accepted as the lowest physiologic dose in the evaluation of adrenal gland functions, this test is not standardized, and a number of problems may be emerged in nonspecialized centers without adequate training in the iv delivery of such a small quantity of the drug.

A number of different studies showed that the 1-µg ACTH test is more sensitive than the 250-µg ACTH test for assessment of the HPA axis (26, 27, 28, 32). We performed the 1-µg ACTH test in the early (on days 4–11) postoperative period and compared with the SAT and the ITT. We demonstrated that the 1-µg ACTH test is better correlated with the ITT than the 250-µg ACTH test. Only two patients with subnormal cortisol response to the ITT had normal cortisol responses to the 1-µg ACTH test. However, five of six patients had adequate cortisol response to the 250-µg ACTH test. There was no correlation between peak cortisol values of the 250-µg ACTH test and the ITT, whereas there was significant correlation between the 1-µg ACTH test and the ITT.

Tordjman et al. (26) compared the cortisol responses of 1, 5, and 250 µg doses of ACTH in 10 patients with pituitary disease and abnormal results of the ITT or metyrapone test, 9 patients with pituitary disease and normal results of the ITT or metyrapone test, and 7 normal subjects. They suggested that the 1-µg ACTH stimulation test can replace standard the 250-µg ACTH stimulation test for the evaluation of milder forms of secondary adrenal insufficiency. Similarly, Rasmuson et al. (27) reported that none of 16 patients with subnormal cortisol responses (<500 nmol/L) (18 µg/dL) to the ITT showed adequate response to the 1-µg ACTH test. In these two studies, the cut-off value for adequate cortisol responses for the ITT was lower than ours. In our study, two of seven patients with inadequate responses to the ITT showed adequate response to the 1-µg ACTH test. Abdu et al. (39) showed that the sensitivity of the 1-µg ACTH test was 100%, whereas the 250-µg ACTH test produced 3% falsely reassuring results when the pass criterion was more than 600 nmol/L (22 µg/dL).

Mayenknecht et al. (40) evaluated the 1-µg ACTH test and the 250-µg ACTH test in 44 patients with pituitary disease and 35 control subjects. They found a high correlation between 30- and 60-min cortisol levels in the 250-µg ACTH test and between cortisol responses to the 1-µg ACTH test and 30-min cortisol responses of the 250-µg ACTH test. In our study, we found that peak cortisol value was reached at 30 min in 37% and at 60 min in 63% of the patients in the 250-µg ACTH test. In the 1-µg ACTH test, 84% of patients had the peak cortisol value at 30 min and 16% at 60 min. For this reason, we have preferred to take peak cortisol values at 30 or 60 min instead of 30-min cortisol values as a criterion for interpretation of the 1- and 250-µg ACTH tests.

It has been suggested that the morning cortisol levels may be a predictor whether further evaluation of the HPA axis by dynamic testing is necessary or not (11, 13, 23, 27, 41, 42). Watts and Tindall (11) suggested that in 2–3 days after pituitary surgery the morning serum cortisol value of more than 250 nmol/L (9.0 µg/dL) indicates a normal reserve of the HPA axis and no further test or treatment is necessary, and the patients with basal cortisol values of less than 240 nmol/L (8.7 µg/dL) should be discharged receiving glucocorticoid therapy, and then at the first month after surgery they should be reevaluated for corticotrophin deficiency. In the other studies, similar suggestions have been reported (13, 41). In this study, basal cortisol levels correlated with peak cortisol responses to the ITT in the pre- and postoperative periods. The morning serum cortisol levels were found less than 250 nmol/L (9.0 µg/dL) in four of six patients with abnormal ITT results. Two of these six patients had higher cortisol values than 250 nmol/L (9.0 µg/dL), such as 349 nmol/L (12.6 µg/dL) and 366 nmol/L (13.3 µg/dL). Although the morning cortisol level is often indeterminant, values over 500–550 nmol/L (18–20 µg/dL) would certainly indicate normal adrenal function and such patients could avoid further testing. We suggest that, unless the basal cortisol value was higher than 500–550 nmol/L, physiologic dose glucocorticoid should be given until the establishment of normal HPA axis.

In ordinary clinical practice, glucocorticoid therapy is given against the acute adrenal insufficiency during surgery and the postoperative period (43). It remains customary to use glucocorticoid therapy during the course of the operation and in the immediate postoperative phase. In recent studies, it has been demonstrated that glucocorticoid administration is not necessary in patients undergoing pituitary surgery pre- or perioperatively (8, 9, 13, 44). In addition, Arafah et al. (9) demonstrated that pituitary function may be normalized in one or two days postoperatively. Hout et al. (8) showed that routine glucocorticoid therapy is not indicated in patients with normal HPA axis preoperatively. The same investigators suggested an alternative approach that glucocorticoid therapy may be given for 1–2 days. We gave prednisolone before anesthesia induction and stopped within 36 h of surgery in the patients, including a patient with abnormal ITT results preoperatively. It is difficult to decide whether glucocorticoid replacement therapy is, or is not, necessary for a patient after pituitary surgery. Although a glucocorticoid replacement can prevent adrenal insufficiency in patients with permanent corticotroph cell damage, the overreplacement may cause a suppression of ACTH secretion and frustrate postoperative evaluation of HPA integrity (6). In the presence of suspicious secondary adrenal failure, witholding the steroids may be harmful to the patients and the present study clearly demonstrates that physiologic glucocorticoid replacement should be given until the time as the HPA axis can be appropriately tested. In this way, one would avoid adrenal insufficiency while also avoiding overreplacement and subsequent suppression of the HPA axis. The ACTH deficiency demonstrated in the early postoperative period may not be permanent (7, 9, 11). We clearly demonstrated that impairment of the HPA axis in the immediate postoperative period was improved at the first or third month after pituitary surgery, and either of these tests in the late postoperative period (i.e. at 2–3 months) might suffice in testing the HPA axis. As shown in the study, it is an open question as to which of these is the best methodology to determine adrenal functions in the late postoperative period.

In conclusion, because the patients, particularly those with macroadenomas, may have secondary adrenal insufficiency, a great attention should be given to the adrenal functions in the postoperative period. Repeated morning serum cortisol levels may be an indicator of postoperative HPA function, but it has limited usefulness in the establishment of probable impaired HPA axis. The 1-µg ACTH stimulation test is more sensitive than the 250-µg ACTH test in comparison with the ITT, for the evaluation of the HPA axis, in the immediate postoperative period after pituitary surgery. However, neither the ITT nor ACTH tests (1 or 250 µg) correctly estimates HPA axis status late postoperatively. Our data indicate that the use of dynamic testing may be inappropriate in the early postoperative period, particularly the use of the 250-µg test, which may have a low sensitivity to identify secondary adrenal insufficiency with respect to the ITT. Our results also indicate that HPA axis dysfunction may be normalized at 1–3 months after pituitary surgery and dynamic testing might be better delayed until the late postoperative period, but the "safe" option is to keep patients on physiologic glucocorticoid replacement for 1–3 months postsurgery and then assess the HPA axis.

Received February 11, 2000.

Revised June 22, 2000.

Accepted June 29, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Vance ML. 1994 Hipopituitarism. N Engl J Med. 330:1651–1662.[Free Full Text]
  2. Laws Jr ER, Thapar K. 1995 Surgical management of pituitary adenomas. Bailliere’s Clin Endocrinol Metab. 9:391–405.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Ebersold MJ, Quast LM, Laws Jr ER, Scheithauer B, Randall RV. 1986 Long-term results in transsphenoidal removal of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. J Neurosurg. 64:713–719.[Medline]
  4. Camtois R, Beauregard H, Somma M, Serri O, Aris-Jilwan N, Hardy J. 1991 The clinical and endocrine outcome to transsphenoidal microsurgery of nonsecreting adenomas. Cancer. 68:860–866.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Mansell P, Scott VL, Logan RF, Recless JPD. 1993 Secondary adrenal insufficiency. Br Med J. 307:253–254.
  6. Grinspoon SK, Biller BMK. 1994 Laboratory assessment of adrenal insufficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 79:923–931.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Arafah BM. 1986 Reversible hypopituitarism in patients with large nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 62:1173–1179.[Abstract]
  8. Hout WM, Arafah BM, Salazar R, Selman W. 1988 Evaluation of the hypotalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis immediately after pituitary adenomectomy: is perioperative steroid therapy necessary? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 66:1208–1212.[Abstract]
  9. Arafah BM, Kailani SH, Nekl KE, Gold RS, Selman WR. 1994 Immediate recovery of pituitary function after transsphenoidal resection of pituitary macroadenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 79:348–354.[Abstract]
  10. Cunningham SK, Moore A, McKenna TJ. 1983 Normal cortisol response to corticotropin in patients with secondary adrenal failure. Arc Int Med. 143:2276–2279.
  11. Watts NB, Tindall GT. 1988 Rapid assessment of corticotropin reserve after pituitary surgery. J Am Med Assoc. 259:708–711.[Abstract]
  12. Vignati F, Berselli ME, Loli P. 1994 Early postoperative evaluation in patients with Cushing’s disease: usefulness of ovine corticotropin-releasing hormone test in the prediction of recurrence of disease. Eur J Endocrinol. 130:235–241.[Abstract]
  13. Auchus RJ, Shewbridge RK, Shepherd MD. 1997 Which patients benefit from provocative adrenal testing after transsphenoidal pituitary surgery? Clin Endocrinol. 46:21–27.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Mukherjee JJ, de Castro J, Kaltsas CG, et al. 1997 A comparison of the insulin tolerance/glucagon test with the short ACTH stimulation test in the assessment of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis in the early post-operative period after hypophysectomy. Clin Endocrinol. 47:51–60.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Oelkers W. 1996 Dose-response aspects in the clinical assessment of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis, and the low-dose adrenocorticotropin test. Eur J Endocrinol. 135:27–33.[Medline]
  16. Trainer PJ, Besser M. 1995 The Barts endocrine protocols, ed. 1. Edinburg: Churchill Livingstone; 4–6.
  17. Fiad TM, Kirby JM, Cunningham SK, McKenna TJ. 1994 The overnight single dose metyrapone test is a simple and reliable index of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Clin Endocrinol. 40:603–609.[Medline]
  18. Kehlet H, Blichert-Toft M, Lindholm J, Rasmussen P. 1976 Short ACTH test in assessing hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical function. Br Med J. 1:249–251.
  19. Kehlet H, Lindholm J, Bjerre P. 1984 Value of 30 min ACTH in assessing hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical function after pituitary surgery in Cushing’s disease. Clin Endocrinol. 20:349–353.[Medline]
  20. Beyer HS, Bantle JP, Mariash CN, Steffes MW, Seljeskog EL, Oppenheimer JH. 1985 Use of the dexamethasone-adrenocorticotropin test to assess the requirement for continued glucocorticoid replacement therapy after pituitary surgery. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 60:1012–1018.[Abstract]
  21. Lindholm J, Kehlet H. 1987 Re-evaluation of the clinical value of 30 min ACTH test in assessing the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical function. Clin Endocrinol. 26:53–59.[Medline]
  22. Stewaert PM, Corrie J, Seckl JR, Edwards CRW, Padfield PL. 1988 A rational approach for assessing the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Lancet. 1:1208–1210.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Hurel SJ, Thompson CJ, Watson MJ, Harris MM, Baylis PH, Kendall-Taylor P. 1996 The short Synacthen and insulin stress tests in the assessment of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Clin Endocrinol. 44:141–146.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Clayton RN. 1996 Short synacthen test versus insulin stress test for assessment of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis: controversy revisited. Clin Endocrinol. 44:147–149.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Borst GC, Michenfelder HJ, O’Brian JT. 1982 Discordant cortisol response to exogenous ACTH and insulin-induced hypoglycemia in patients with pituitary diseases. N Engl J Med. 306:1462–1464.[Medline]
  26. Tordjman K, Jaffe A, Grazas N, Apter C, Stern N. 1995 The role of the low dose (1 µg) adrenocorticotropin test in the evaluation of patients with pituitary diseases. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 80:1301–1305.[Abstract]
  27. Rasmuson S, Olsson T, Hagg E. 1996 A low-dose ACTH test to assess the function of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Clin Endocrinol. 44:151–156.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Dickstein G, Shechner C, Nicholson WE, et al. 1991 Adrenocorticotropin stimulation test: effects of basal cortisol level, time of day, and suggested new sensitive low dose test. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 72:773–778.[Abstract]
  29. Crowley S, Hindmarsh PC, Holownia P, Honou JW, Brook CGD. 1991 The use of low doses of ACTH in the investigation of adrenal function in man. J Endocrinol. 130:475–479.[Abstract]
  30. Daidoh H, Morita H, Mune T, Hanafusa H, Shibata T, Yasuda K. 1995 Responses of plasma adrenocortical steroids to low dose ACTH in normal subjects. Clin Endocrinol. 43:311–315.[Medline]
  31. Dickstein G. 1997 Low-dose ACTH test—a word of caution to the word of caution: when and how to use it (Letter). J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 82:322.[Free Full Text]
  32. Broide J, Soferman R, Kivity S, et al. 1995 Low-dose adrenocorticotropin test reveals impaired adrenal function in patients taking inhaled corticosteroids. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 80:1243–1246.[Abstract]
  33. Weintrob N, Sprecher E, Josefsberg Z, et al. 1998 Standard and low-dose short adrenocorticotropin test compared with insulin-induced hypoglycemia for assessment of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in children with idiopathic multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 83:88–92.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Scott LV, Medbak S, Dinan TG. 1998 The low-dose ACTH test in chronic fatigue syndrome and health. Clin Endocrinol. 48:733–737.[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Orme SM, Peacey SR, Barth JH, Belchetz PE. 1996 Comparison of tests of stress-released cortisol secretion in pituitary disease. Clin Endocrinol. 45:135–140.[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Ammari F, Issa E, Millward E, Scanlon MF. 1996 A comparison between short ACTH and insulin stress tests for hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal function. Clin Endocrinol. 44:473–476.[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Landon J, James VHT, Wharton MJ, Friedman M. 1967 Threshold adrenocortical sensitivity in man and its possible application to corticotrophin bioassay. Lancet. 2:697–700.[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Dickstein G, Shechner C, Nicholson WE, et al. 1991 Adrenocorticotropin stimulation test: effects of basal cortisol level, time of day, and suggested new sensitive low dose test. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 72:773–778.
  39. Abdu TA, Elhadd TA, Neary R, Clayton RN. 1999 Comparison of the low-dose short synacthen test (1 µg), the conventional dose short synacten test (250 µg), and the insulin tolerance test for assessment of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis in patients with pituitary disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 84:838–843.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Mayenknecht J, Diederich S, Bahr V, Plöckinger U, Oelkers W. 1998 Comparison of low- and high-dose corticotropin stimulation tests in patients with pituitary disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 83:1558–1562.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Hagg E, Asplund K, Lithner F. 1987 Value of basal plasma cortisol assays in the assessment of pituitary adrenal insufficiency. Clin Endocrinol. 26:221–226.[Medline]
  42. Jones SI, Trainer PJ, Perr L, Wass J, Besser GM, Groosman A. 1994 An audit of the insulin tolerance test in adult subjects in an acute investigation unit over one year. Clin Endocrinol. 41:123–128.[Medline]
  43. Wilson CB, Dempsey LC. 1978 Transsphenoidal microsurgical removal of 250 pituitary adenomas. J Neurosurg. 48:13–22.[Medline]
  44. Garcia-Luna PP, Leal-Cerro A, Rocha JL, Francisco T, Garcia-Pesquera F, Astorga R. 1990 Evaluation of pituitary-adrenal axis before, during and after pituitary adenomectomy. Is perioperative glucocorticoid therapy necessary? Acta Endocrinol Copenh. 122:83–88.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Christ-Crain, S. Jutla, I. Widmer, O. Couppis, C. Konig, H. Pargger, J. Puder, R. Edwards, B. Muller, and A. B. Grossman
Measurement of Serum Free Cortisol Shows Discordant Responsivity to Stress and Dynamic Evaluation
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2007; 92(5): 1729 - 1735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Agha, J. W. Tomlinson, P. M. Clark, G. Holder, and P. M. Stewart
The Long-Term Predictive Accuracy of the Short Synacthen (Corticotropin) Stimulation Test for Assessment of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2006; 91(1): 43 - 47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
R. Salvatori
Adrenal Insufficiency
JAMA, November 16, 2005; 294(19): 2481 - 2488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. H. Courtney, A. S. McAllister, P. M. Bell, D. R. McCance, H. Leslie, B. Sheridan, and A. B. Atkinson
Low- and Standard-Dose Corticotropin and Insulin Hypoglycemia Testing in the Assessment of Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Function after Pituitary Surgery
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2004; 89(4): 1712 - 1717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
H. K. Gleeson, B. R. Walker, J. R. Seckl, and P. L. Padfield
Ten Years on: Safety of Short Synacthen Tests in Assessing Adrenocorticotropin Deficiency in Clinical Practice
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2003; 88(5): 2106 - 2111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
D. R. Williamson, M. Albert, and M. Charneux
Corticosteroids for Patients With Septic Shock
JAMA, January 1, 2003; 289(1): 42 - 42.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dökmetas, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by Bayram, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dökmetas, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by Bayram, F.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals