| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Original Studies |
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University (R.T.C., K.R.H.), Chicago, Illinois 60611; University of Illinois College of Nursing (P.D.H.), Chicago, Illinois 60612; University of Illinois College of Medicine J.C.A., S.M.B.), Peoria, Illinois 61656; and Loyola Medical School (M.J.Z.), Chicago, Illinois 60153
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Robert T. Chatterton, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Medical School, 333 East Superior Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611. E-mail: chat{at}nwu.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-adrenergic activity, was highly negatively correlated on each
occasion with PRL AUC (r = -0.58, -0.68, and -0.86,
respectively), but not with oxytocin. Salivary cortisol was negatively
correlated to a lesser degree. We hypothesize that deficiencies in
preterm lactation are mediated in part upon stress-induced suppression
of PRL secretion through an adrenergic mechanism. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Two major endocrine factors, PRL and oxytocin, play important roles in the initiation and control of lactation. PRL is essential for lactogenesis, the initiation of lactation, but its role in the maintenance of lactation is less clear (2, 3). The correlation between PRL levels and milk production is generally very low (4, 5, 6). Nevertheless, bromoergocriptine, which suppresses PRL secretion at the level of the pituitary, is capable of completely suppressing milk secretion even in established lactation (7, 8), and when complete emptying of the breast is assured, there is evidence for a relationship between PRL levels and milk production (9).
Unlike PRL, oxytocin release generally occurs as a conditioned response; release occurs in most women before the tactile stimulus of suckling (5, 10) and can be stimulated by various sensory inputs, such as seeing the baby or hearing it cry. Oxytocin is important for milk ejection, although whether it is essential for milk let-down in the human has been debated (11). Nevertheless, it clearly facilitates emptying of the breast and thereby the continuation of milk secretion (10, 12). Administration of oxytocin has been shown to enhance milk production in mothers delivering prematurely (13), so oxytocin responses in mothers of the present study may be an indication of the success or failure of lactation.
Most studies of PRL responses to infant suckling as well as the association between PRL and milk production have been conducted in women after normal term deliveries (6, 9, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19). Some data are available on the response to mechanical breast stimulation (6, 17), but there is little information on the evaluation of mechanical pumping devices in mothers of preterm infants. Studies of oxytocin have primarily focused upon the response to infant suckling (5, 11, 18) and low milk yield with inadequate emptying of the breast (6, 10, 12, 13). Because premature delivery is associated with a high degree of psychological distress (20, 21), we recorded self-reports of stress and assessed physiological responses to stress for comparison with measures of milk production and hormone levels.
The purpose of this study was 2- fold: 1) to determine the relationship between milk production and PRL and oxytocin levels with time during mechanical breast stimulation, and 2) to examine the relationship between milk production, PRL, and oxytocin levels and measures of stress. Both were studied in women with prematurely delivered infants.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subjects were limited to mothers able to read, speak, and write English or Spanish, with access to a telephone, who were nonsmokers, who had no thyroid or other endocrine disorders, who intended to lactate a minimum of 2 months, and who were willing to transport their milk to the hospital at least weekly. Additionally, only mothers delivering an infant(s) of 1500 g or less and 30 weeks gestation or less at birth were eligible for study inclusion. Subjects were given the telephone numbers of the research nurse and principal investigator and were encouraged to phone with questions or concerns. Subjects signed a consent form, which had been approved by the appropriate institutional review boards. A total of 39 subjects were enrolled and participated in measurements of milk production. Eighteen subjects consented to have blood drawn for oxytocin and PRL assays; 10 collected all samples as outlined in the protocol.
Among the 39 subjects, ages ranged from 1940, with a mean of 29.7 yr. Education in years ranged from 1218, with a mean of 14.6. Infant birth weight was 1058 ± 253 g (SD), and gestational age was 27.2 ± 1.5 weeks (SD). Thirty-three (84.6%) of the women were married; 29 (76.5%) were white. Thirty (76.9%) had no prior breastfeeding experience. Twenty-one (53.8%) of the mothers had a vaginal birth. The 18 subjects who enrolled in the blood-sampling protocol did not differ significantly from these averages.
Procedures
Mothers who met study criteria were approached within 48 h after delivery by a registered nurse hired for the purpose of this study. The research nurse at each tertiary care center who recruited subjects as well as other nurses who weighed milk samples and performed the venipuncture were trained by the principal investigator with respect to study objectives, protocols, and procedures. The research nurses were knowledgeable about lactation and breast pumps, and had received training from a Medela representative with respect to the Lactina model 016 breast pump (Medela, Inc., McHenry, IL). In addition to the Medela Lactina breast pump, mothers received a stopwatch, a carrying case, four cooler packs, sterile collection milk bags, and other necessary supplies for recording of data. Participants received verbal and written instructions on the study protocol for milk collection, storage, and transport of milk. Subjects viewed a videotape by Medela on breast pump assembly and then assembled the equipment in the presence of the research nurse.
Milk pumping instrumentation
The breast-pumping regimens employed either the Medela single or double collection kit attached to the Medela 016 Lactina breast pump. The single collection kit allows suction to be applied to the breasts sequentially, whereas the double collection kit allows suction to be applied to both breasts simultaneously. The pumps feature varying breast flange sizes, user-controlled vacuum, and piston action. The adjustable suction range is approximately 110240 mm Hg, and the pump is preset to apply suction about 4248 times/min.
Pumping protocol
Mothers were requested to follow the written pumping protocol which consisted of five times per day during hospitalization and eight times per day after hospital discharge through day 42 postpartum and to record in the logbook the date and start and end times of each pumping. Subjects using the single pump were instructed to pump for a minimum of 5 min, then switch to the other side; this was done twice, so that each breast was stimulated a minimum of 10 min total time. They were to switch sides when the milk stopped spraying or dripping regularly. Mothers were to begin by using warm compresses (a washcloth/towel dipped in warm water), using both hands to lift their breasts gently off the rib cage from the side under their arm and then in the cleavage from the front. Then they were to massage their breasts just before using the breast pump. In addition, all mothers were to look at a picture of their baby or inhale the babys scent from a blanket or piece of clothing the baby had worn. These instructions were designed to aid in letting down the milk. Subjects using the double pumping device were instructed to pump a minimum of 10 min and stop when the spraying or dripping of milk ceased.
Subjects brought their milk to the hospital almost daily. Each bag of mothers expressed milk was weighed on an electronic, digital scale to the nearest 0.1 g (2.8 g was subtracted for the bag and tie) and recorded in the logbook by the research nurse. On the day before the scheduled venipuncture, the principal investigator telephoned each subject to remind her to meet the designated research nurse in the neonatal intensive care unit at 0830 h on the following day.
Sample collection procedures
At 1030 h on study days 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42
postpartum, subjects collected a saliva sample for analysis of cortisol
and
-amylase at home. Saliva was collected by chewing for 60 s
on a 1-in. cube of sponge. The sponge was then removed from the mouth
by the subject and placed in a disposable plastic beaker, and the
saliva was expressed into a vial by manually squeezing the beaker. The
vials were stoppered and placed in the home freezer until brought to
the hospital in insulated carrying packs provided. At the hospital the
saliva was stored at -20 C until brought to the laboratory on dry ice.
Storage in the laboratory was at -20 C.
On weeks 2, 4, and 6 after delivery, the subjects arrived at the hospital at 0830 h for collection of multiple blood samples during breast pumping. Subjects were requested to fast after 0830 h on the scheduled day until completion of the procedure and not to use the breast pump 23 h before venipuncture. At 0900 h, the research nurse inserted a heparin lock into an antecubital vein. After a 50-min waiting period to allow for any stress-induced changes in PRL and oxytocin to recede (22), the iv line was flushed with saline and connected to an infusion/withdrawal syringe pump. At 0950 h, blood was withdrawn by use of an exfusion pump at the rate of 0.5 mL/min for a total of 70 min. The collection syringe was surrounded by an ice pack. After each 10-min withdrawal period, blood was removed and transferred to a tube, which was stoppered and placed on ice. The subjects began the pumping regimen at 1000 h and continued for 10 or 20 min depending upon which collection kit they used. At 1030 h, a sample of saliva was collected. At 1100 h, the iv catheter was removed. The blood samples were then brought to the laboratory, where they were centrifuged at 4 C; the plasma was withdrawn and stored in sealed vials at -70 C. Samples from outside Northwestern University Medical Center were shipped on dry ice to the assay laboratory. Procedures for collection of samples for oxytocin assay were designed after consultation with Dr. Laird Wilson, University of Illinois College of Medicine.
Psychological assessment
The Multiple Affect Adjective ChecklistRevised (MAACL-R) (23) was self-administered by the subjects weekly at 1030 h. The completed forms were brought to the clinic with the milk. Standard scores were calculated according to the procedures described in the manual (23).
Hormone assays
Oxytocin was assayed as described by McNeilly et al.
(5) and in the information provided by Advance ChemTech, Inc.
(Louisville, KY). After dilution of the 1.0-mL plasma sample with 3 mL
0.1% trifluoroacetic acid, the precipitated proteins were removed by
centrifugation. Oxytocin was extracted from the supernatant liquid on
Sep-Pak C18 cartridges (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA); the cartridges were washed with 0.1%
trifluoroacetic acid and eluted with 60% acetonitrile in 0.1%
trifluoroacetic acid. The solvent was evaporated from the eluted
oxytocin under a stream of air at 50 C, the residue was reconstituted
in 0.01 mol/L phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, and samples were analyzed by a
double antibody method. Antiserum, 125I-labeled
oxytocin, and the reference material were obtained from Advanced ChemTech, Inc. The antiserum used cross-reacts with arginine
vasopressin,
-atrial natriuretic peptide, CRH, GHRH, GnRH,
somatostatin, TRH, and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide less than
0.01%. The minimal detectable concentration is 0.4 pg/tube. The
intraassay coefficient of variation (CV) for these assays was 8.3%,
and the interassay CV was 10.2%.
PRL was assayed by a direct, two-site immunoradiometric assay without extraction using materials supplied by Diagnostics Systems Laboratories, Inc. (Webster, TX). The antiserum cross-reacts less than 0.1% with hCG, human GH, TSH, LH, FSH, and insulin. The minimal detectable concentration according to the provider is 0.1 ng/mL. The intraassay CV for these assays was 8.0%. The interassay CV was 11.5%.
Salivary cortisol was measured as described previously (24) without extraction. The antiserum cross-reacts 17.4% with 11-deoxycortisol, 5.4% with corticosterone, and less than 0.2% with all other steroids tested. The minimal detectable concentration is 68 pmol/L. The intraassay CV for these samples was 11.6%. The interassay CV was 14.2%.
Salivary
-amylase was measured by its ability to hydrolyze the
substrate, 4,6-ethylidene
(
-D-maltoheptaside)7-p-nitrophenyl,
as described previously (24) using reagents obtained from
Sigma (St. Louis, MO). The sensitivity of the assay was 24
U/mL. The interassay CV was 8.5%.
Data analysis
This was a longitudinal study with a repeated measures design for determining the pattern of response of oxytocin and PRL during 6 weeks of mechanical breast stimulation and for ascertaining the relationship of these hormones and two stress measures to milk production.
Data were analyzed using Pearsons correlation procedure, simple
regression, backward stepwise multiple regression, and ANOVA with
repeated measures and Students t tests. Differences were
considered significant at P
0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Correlations within subjects across time were determined for the
hormones and milk volume measures. The area under the curve (AUC) for
plasma oxytocin and PRL concentrations over 70 min of sampling was
measured on weeks 2, 4, and 6. The correlations among adjacent
measurements for each hormone are shown in Table 1
. Over 65% of the variance in both
oxytocin and PRL in week 4 could be predicted from the measurements
made in week 2, but the values in week 6 were less well predicted from
week 4 values. Milk volume and salivary cortisol and
-amylase were
measured weekly. The average amount of milk produced each week was
plotted for single and double pumping procedures (Fig. 1
). As shown in Table 2
, the correlation between adjacent weeks
in milk volume was very high. Salivary cortisol and
-amylase
concentrations, measured to assess physiological stress in the
subjects, were less predictable from time to time within women (Table 2
).
|
|
|
Milk production in the first week of breast pumping was not
related to gestational age at delivery (r = -0.03), and
production increased significantly (P < 0.001) across
the 6-week period by repeated measures ANOVA (Fig. 1
). As the
variance between subjects was 27.6 times as great as the within-subject
variance, the apparent difference between the two types of pumping
procedures (a between-subject variable) was not significant
(P = 0.17).
The distribution of women across ranges of milk produced is shown in
Fig. 2
for the fourth week of the study.
The distribution is extremely broad with no mode. In the sixth week of
the study, 8 of the 32 women remaining in the study were producing 1600
mL milk/week or less; these had a mean pumping frequency of 30.6
compared to 42.3 for those producing 1600 mL/week or more
(P = 0.02).
|
Oxytocin AUC did not change significantly with weeks of lactation
(2, 4, and 6 weeks after delivery) when analyzed by repeated measures
ANOVA. Ten subjects completed all 3 sampling periods for this analysis.
The mean values from all 18 subjects during the 7 sampling intervals at
each session are shown in Fig. 3
. Values
are plotted at the midpoint of each of the 7 continuous 10-min blood
withdrawal periods. The high levels at the initiation of breast pumping
provide evidence that oxytocin release has become a conditioned
response by day 14. There was a significant decline in plasma oxytocin
during the 70-min sessions in each of the first 2 sessions, but not in
the third (P = 0.011, 0.042, and 0.840, respectively).
The between-subject variance was 3.4-fold greater than the
within-subject variance for oxytocin, indicating a relatively large
intersubject variation.
|
The AUC of plasma oxytocin was correlated with milk volume within each of the periods studied (r = 0.37, 0.58, and 0.55 in weeks 2, 4, and 6, respectively). However, by regression analysis, oxytocin AUC was significantly related to milk volume only in week 6 (P = 0.043).
There was no significant difference in plasma oxytocin concentrations between pumping procedures in the second and fourth weeks; the differences between single and double pumping procedures averaged 0.1 ± 3.1 and 4.0 ± 4.0 pg/mL, respectively. The patterns across the 70-min blood sampling period were similar despite the fact that the single pumping procedure was twice as long as the double pumping procedure. At week 6, however, the double pumping procedure resulted in more than twice as much oxytocin across the 70-min sampling period (by t test of differences, P < 0.001). The difference was 38.0 ± 9.2 pg/mL.
Plasma PRL levels
PRL AUC declined significantly with weeks of lactation by repeated
measures ANOVA (P = 0.033). The mean AUC values for the
second, fourth, and sixth weeks were 3894, 3064, and 2454 ng·min/mL,
respectively, for the 70-min period among the 9 subjects who completed
all 3 sampling periods. The mean plasma PRL concentrations from all 18
subjects during the 7 sampling intervals at each session are shown in
Fig. 4
. Values are plotted at the
midpoint of each of the 7 continuous 10-min blood withdrawal periods.
There was a significant increase in plasma PRL during the 70-min
sessions by repeated measures ANOVA in each of the first 2 sessions,
but not in the third (P < 0.001, 0.001, and 0.100,
respectively). The between-subject variance in PRL was only 1.75-fold
greater than the within-subject variance. PRL AUC was negatively
correlated with the oxytocin AUC at 2, 4, and 6 weeks; the correlations
were -0.41, -0.70, and -0.34, respectively.
|
There were no correlations between PRL and milk volume within any of the sampling periods (r = -0.23, -0.44, and 0.05 in weeks 2, 4, and 6, respectively). Including PRL AUC in the regression analysis with oxytocin AUC increased the significance of the relationship in week 6 (P = 0.023); however, by stepwise regression the contribution of PRL AUC did not reach significance. Thus, the decrease in milk volume in one third of the subjects was not related contemporaneously to the decline in PRL.
The pattern of PRL concentrations during the 70-min sampling period was
also compared between the single and double pumping procedures. The
patterns within types of pumps were similar at 2, 4, and 6 weeks, but
between pumps there was a significant difference; the mean PRL
concentration for the single pump was 43 ng/mL, and that for the double
pump was 73 ng/mL (by t test of differences,
P = 0.002). The difference was only evident in blood
samples drawn after 20 min (Table 3
).
|
Using the values for the normal population from the manual for the
MAACL-R (Table 20 in Ref. 23), the mothers, tested weekly for the first
5 weeks, had anxiety subscores that were consistently significantly
above the norm (mean standard score of 64.2 ± 21.0 SD
compared to 52.1 for the norm; P < 0.01). The anxiety
subscores by weeks were significantly different by ANOVA with repeated
measures (P = 0.006), with a significant cubic
relationship (P = 0.001; data are shown in Fig. 5
). Depression subscores were also
significantly elevated, but only in the first 2 weeks, 66.7 ±
28.5 and 64.3 ± 26.16 SD compared to a
value of 50.4 for the norm (P < 0.01). Thereafter, the
depression subscores were not significantly different from the norm.
The depression subscores by weeks were significantly different by ANOVA
with repeated measures (P < 0.001), with a significant
linear relationship (P = 0.002; data are shown in Fig. 6
). Hostility subscores were not
different from the norm at any time (data not shown). The three
subscores of the MAACL-R were not significantly correlated at any of
the weekly periods studied with either salivary
-amylase or
cortisol, nor were any of the subscores correlated with milk volume.
However, the patterns with time in the anxiety and depression subscores
were similar to the physiological measures, in that all measures
decreased during the first 3 weeks postpartum.
|
|
-amylase and cortisol levels during the
study
Salivary
-amylase levels, a measure of sympathetic adrenergic
activity, decreased with experience with the pumping procedure (Fig. 7
). The polynomial test of order-1
(linear) was significant (P = 0.045). Between-subject
variance was not significantly greater than within-subject
variance.
|
|
-amylase and cortisol to PRL and oxytocin
levels
Salivary
-amylase concentrations were highly negatively
correlated with plasma PRL AUC; the correlations within the 2-, 4-, and
6-week intervals were -0.58, -0.68, and -0.86, respectively. Thus,
this measure of stress is associated with suppression of PRL levels.
Nevertheless, neither
-amylase nor PRL levels were associated with
milk production under conditions of this study. Statistically, salivary
-amylase concentrations were not consistently related to oxytocin
AUC across all three time intervals, but were positively correlated
within the 6-week observations (r = 0.61).
Salivary cortisol was negatively correlated with plasma PRL AUC also, but less consistently. The correlations for 2, 4, and 6 weeks were -0.04, -0.44, and -0.69, respectively. There was no correlation between salivary cortisol and oxytocin AUC.
Relation of infant prognosis to PRL and stress measures
The relative health of the infants was assessed by the length of the hospital stay. There were no statistically significant correlations between the length of hospital stay and milk production, self-assessment of stress, or physiological measures of stress in this small study.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The milk production among the women in the present study was
similar to that reported for women after term deliveries. Milk
production in this study for the first 7 days averaged between 8564
g/day for the women in the study. Bohnet and Kato (4) reported a range
of 101267 g/day for the first 7 days in 35 mothers after term
deliveries. Using mechanical pumping devices, Zinaman et al.
(17) found, assuming six feedings per day, a range of 450-1050 g/day
2842 days after term deliveries. In the present study the milk
production for the period from 2935 days postpartum had an average
range of 41358 g/day, with a mean of 473 g/day. There is no evidence
that the amount of milk was uniformly affected by the premature
delivery, and there was no correlation in this study between
gestational age and milk production during the first week of lactation.
Nevertheless, almost one third of the mothers were producing less than
250 mL milk/day by week 4. At week 6, the women with lower yields of
milk were pumping significantly less frequently than those with higher
yields (
1600 mL/week). Whether the lower frequency of breast pumping
is the cause rather than the effect of less milk production cannot be
determined at this time, but previous studies have suggested that
maintenance of lactation is dependent upon suckling frequency (6, 15).
No differences between the single and double pumping procedures were
detected. This confirms earlier reports in which a double and a single
pumping system were compared after term (17) and (25) preterm
deliveries.
Oxytocin response
In the present study plasma oxytocin levels during the first 10 min of sampling, before pumping, averaged 55.1 ± 5.6 (±SD) pg/mL. At 3040 min, the mean value was 52.5 ± 7.9 pg/mL. It is evident that the protocol employed as preparation for pumping was effective in elevating oxytocin before physical pumping began, as may have been expected based on previous work (5). The levels achieved are similar to the maximal levels reported by other investigators (5, 11). Therefore, there is no evidence that the women with preterm deliveries using the Medela pump were deficient in oxytocin. Also, there was no evidence for a decline in oxytocin levels from 26 weeks of lactation. This is consistent with the study by Johnston and Amico (18), in which the response was found to be undiminished even after 6 months of lactation. The range of concentrations was great among individuals, with some as low as 2 pg/mL. However, unlike the report by Lucas et al. (11) all of the 15 subjects studied produced a response to the pumping regimen.
Relation of oxytocin to milk volume
There was a positive correlation between oxytocin and milk volume in all three postpartum periods studied, although the regression was significant only in the sixth week. Ruis et al. (13) demonstrated a beneficial effect of oxytocin administration on milk yield in women after preterm deliveries; the volume of milk, obtained by use of a breast pump, was increased 4-fold over control values in women who received 3 U oxytocin four times a day just before pumping. Thus, at least in the mothers who delivered preterm infants, oxytocin appears to be a limiting factor in milk production.
In established lactation there is some evidence that oxytocin may not be required for breast emptying in the human (11). However, other investigations have not corroborated this finding (5, 18).
PRL levels in lactation
During pregnancy, PRL levels rise from approximately 10 to 150200 ng/mL at term (26). A significant rise continues between the 24th and 36th weeks of gestation (4). Thus, the mothers of preterm infants may have baseline PRL levels that are significantly lower than those in mothers of term babies. It could be argued that this is a reason for the lower milk production in women with premature delivery. However, PRL levels in the present study varied widely among individual women and were not correlated with the amount of milk produced. The PRL AUC (determined from the same subjects at each time point) declined significantly from the second to the sixth week. This is in contrast to studies of breastfeeding mothers of term infants in whom no significant decrease in PRL response to suckling occurred within the first 40 days (14, 15). The increase in PRL in response to the pumping stimulus, although highly significant in weeks 2 and 4, had become nonsignificant in week 6. The lack of response in week 6 is also inconsistent with responses in breastfeeding mothers of term infants (14, 15). This may represent a declining responsiveness that results in inadequate milk production in mothers of some preterm infants.
Strength of stimulus and PRL
The basal (unstimulated) levels of PRL in the present study were considerably lower at 2, 4, and 6 weeks [25.8 ± 3.2 (±SD) ng/mL] compared to those reported in studies of lactation after term delivery. The range of basal concentrations in 5 studies representing 135 subjects was 36105, with a mean of 64.2 ± 28.3 ng/mL (assuming 1.0 mg = 30 IU for studies reporting international units) (6, 9, 15, 16, 17). However, the peak levels were in the same range as in the studies of women with term deliveries (54129 ng/mL) despite the fact that in the present study the peak values were diminished by the continuous blood withdrawal procedure. The strength of the stimulus is clearly important for stimulation of PRL secretion. Zinaman et al. (17) found that the pump with the gentlest action produced significantly less PRL than the other pumps tested. In the present study the double pump gave a higher serum PRL concentration, particularly after 20 min of sampling (i.e. after the pumping has ceased), similar to the findings of Zinaman et al. (17) in the term lactation condition.
PRL and milk volume
PRL AUC was unrelated to milk volume. This has been the experience of some investigators after term deliveries as well (4, 6, 15), although Aono et al. (9) were able to distinguish a relationship between PRL and milk production when they used a breast pump to empty the breast after the mothers had suckled their babies. Even though the relationship between PRL and milk production has been difficult to demonstrate from measurements taken concurrently, there can be no doubt about the necessity of PRL for lactogenesis. Suppression of PRL secretion by bromocriptine in the puerperium leads to cessation of milk production (27).
Psychological measures of distress
The experience and consequences of premature delivery are very stressful. Women with very low birth weight (VLBW) infants were found in a recent study to have significantly (n = 123; P = 0.003) more psychological distress, as measured by standardized, normative, self-report measures, than mothers of term infants (20). At 2 yr postpartum, mothers of low risk VLBW infants did not differ from term mothers, whereas mothers of high risk infants continued to report psychological distress. By 3 yr, mothers of high risk VLBW children did not differ from mothers of term children in distress symptoms. Another study, using the same psychological instrument as that used in the present study, the Multiple Affect Adjective Checklist-Revised, also found significant differences in both anxiety (n = 47; P = 0.05) and depression (n = 47; P = 0.01), but not in hostility, in mothers of premature infants when comparing responses in the women at the time of discharge with those 9 months later (21). Data from the present study are consistent with the earlier reports.
Physiological measures of stress
The catecholamines are particularly known for responses to acute stress. However, psychological stress of the sort that these subjects have endured has been shown to result in chronically elevated plasma levels of epinephrine and norepinephrine as well (28).
The
-amylase concentration in saliva has been shown to correlate
with plasma norepinephrine and to increase in response to a variety of
stressors (24, 29). Indeed, the salivary glands have been shown to
respond to ß-adrenergic agonists with an increase in secretion of
-amylase without an increase in salivary flow (30). In the present
study salivary
-amylase negatively correlated with PRL AUC at 2, 4,
and 6 weeks. Thus, increased stress measured by this criterion is
associated with suppression of PRL. Salivary cortisol concentrations
were also negatively correlated with PRL AUC in the fourth and sixth
weeks postpartum, but not as significantly as
-amylase. This is not
surprising, as the levels of salivary cortisol in women with preterm
deliveries were not significantly higher than those in nonlactating
control women at any time during the period of observation.
Usually, one associates a stress response, including psychological stress, with an increase in PRL (31, 32). However, this process may be reversed under conditions in which PRL levels are normally elevated in both humans and rats (33, 34). Such appears to be the case under the conditions of the present study. This finding was not hypothesized at the outset of the study and should be examined further for confirmation.
Neither salivary
-amylase nor cortisol had a consistent association
with oxytocin levels in the present study. Pain or fright has been
shown to inhibit milk let-down in animal species through an adrenergic
mechanism (35), and in the human there is evidence that distractions
can decrease milk yield, apparently through suppression of oxytocin
release (10). Nevertheless, in other studies emotional stress has been
shown to increase oxytocin secretion (36). If both types of
observations are applicable, they would appear to have cancelled each
other out in our study.
Relation between psychological and physiological measures of stress
Although all of the psychological and physiological measures of
stress decreased with time after delivery, within subjects there were
no significant correlations between any of the psychological measures
and salivary
-amylase or cortisol when measured at any of the six
weekly periods of assessment. It appears that the psychological and
physiological variables are measuring different responses or the
cumulative effect of the psychological distress is not exhibited
similarly among subjects. Alternatively, it may be that the time for
the physiological expression of psychological distress is different
among the subjects. Even in the acute stress associated with skydiving,
highly significant increases in MAACL-R anxiety subscores were obtained
before any increase in plasma or salivary cortisol or salivary
-amylase was observed (24).
Conclusion
The most significant relationship found in this study was the
relationship between salivary
-amylase and PRL. Although no close
correlation exists between PRL and milk production, PRL is
unquestionably essential for the maintenance of lactation. After
inhibition of PRL secretion by administration of
bromocriptine, milk secretion ceases after 34 days (27).
Indeed, suppression of PRL secretion by any means is likely to decrease
milk production. Therefore, because of the high negative correlation
between salivary
-amylase and plasma PRL, we hypothesize that the
stress associated with preterm deliveries may result in inadequate
lactation through an adrenergic mechanism.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received February 29, 2000.
Revised May 24, 2000.
Accepted June 27, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-amylase as a measure of endogenous
adrenergic activity. Clin Physiol. 16:433448.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. H. Nyqvist and E. Kylberg Application of the Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative to Neonatal Care: Suggestions by Swedish Mothers of Very Preterm Infants J Hum Lact, August 1, 2008; 24(3): 252 - 262. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. P. Meier and J. L. Engstrom Evidence-based Practices to Promote Exclusive Feeding of Human Milk in Very Low-birthweight Infants NeoReviews, November 1, 2007; 8(11): e467 - e477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. Sanchez-Perez, M. A. Hernan, A. Rios-Gonzalez, M. Arana-Cedeno, A. Navarro, D. Ford, M. A. Micek, and P. Brentlinger Malnutrition Among Children Younger Than 5 Years-Old in Conflict Zones of Chiapas, Mexico Am J Public Health, February 1, 2007; 97(2): 229 - 232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M S Fewtrell, K L Loh, A Blake, D A Ridout, and J Hawdon Randomised, double blind trial of oxytocin nasal spray in mothers expressing breast milk for preterm infants Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., May 1, 2006; 91(3): F169 - F174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Mennella, M. Y. Pepino, and K. L. Teff Acute Alcohol Consumption Disrupts the Hormonal Milieu of Lactating Women J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2005; 90(4): 1979 - 1985. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |