help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rotman-Pikielny, P.
Right arrow Articles by Sarlis, N. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rotman-Pikielny, P.
Right arrow Articles by Sarlis, N. J.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 85, No. 1 237-244
Copyright © 2000 by The Endocrine Society


Original Studies

Recombinant Human Thyrotropin for the Diagnosis and Treatment of a Highly Functional Metastatic Struma Ovarii*

Pnina Rotman-Pikielny, James C. Reynolds, William C. Barker, Paul M. Yen, Monica C. Skarulis and Nicholas J. Sarlis

Clinical Endocrinology Branch (P.R.-P., P.M.Y., N.J.S.) and Division of Intramural Research (M.C.S.), National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney Diseases, and the Nuclear Medicine Department (J.C.R., W.C.B.), Warren G. Magnuson Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892

Address correspondence and requests for reprints to: Nicholas J. Sarlis, M.D., Ph.D., Investigator, Clinical Endocrinology Branch, National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Room 8D12C, 10 Center Drive, MSC 1758, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1758. E-mail: njsarlis{at}helix.nih.gov


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Report
 Method of Determination of...
 References
 
The optimal treatment of metastatic thyroid cancer that produces high amounts of thyroid hormone has not been well defined. A 46-yr-old woman presented with a follicular thyroid carcinoma arising from a struma ovarii with hepatic metastases. After the removal of both the struma and the thyroid gland, the liver metastases showed evidence of a high degree of hormonogenesis. Brain, chest, abdomen, and bone imaging was negative for additional metastases. Because iodine uptake by most thyroid carcinomas is quite low in the absence of high levels of ambient TSH, we used recombinant human TSH (rhTSH) (Thyrogen) to achieve a concentration of 131I activity in the tumor high enough for a significant cytotoxic effect. After rhTSH administration (0.9 mg im daily for 2 consecutive days), a 131I diagnostic whole body scan confirmed the existence of 17 discrete hepatic foci of 131I uptake. To calculate the amount of 131I that would deliver an absorbed radiation dose that would be optimally cytotoxic to the metastases (>8000 rad/lesion) and not to the normal liver, we performed lesion dosimetry. Analysis of dosimetric data showed that 15 of 17 lesions would receive an adequate radiation dose following the administration of 65 mCi of 131I. Additionally, we performed whole body dosimetry to assure that this dose would not cause bone marrow toxicity. The patient was reevaluated 6 months after therapy; the liver metastases showed significant, but partial, response. In conclusion, we used the combination of rhTSH with lesional and whole body dosimetry for the treatment of highly functional metastases from follicular thyroid carcinoma arising within a struma ovarii. This strategy can be applied to determine a safe and effective dose of 131I for the treatment of any thyroid cancer metastases that produce enough TH to preclude stimulation of endogenous pituitary TSH secretion.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Report
 Method of Determination of...
 References
 
STRUMA OVARII is a rare ovarian teratoma consisting mainly of thyroid tissue and comprises up to 2% of all ovarian tumors (1, 2). Malignancy occurs in 5–10% of the cases (3, 4, 5, 6, 7). However, only approximately 5% of malignant strumae metastasize, mainly to the peritoneum and liver (8). Due to the rarity of this tumor, experience with therapy is limited and has not been well defined (9). Most benign strumae accumulate iodine and occasionally may even produce significant amounts of thyroid hormones (TH), as they resemble normal thyroid tissue (10, 11, 12). In contrast, malignant strumae behave more like thyroid carcinomas, demonstrating relatively poor iodine uptake, and do not usually secrete TH (7, 8). Hence, the management of malignant strumae should be similar to that of thyroid carcinoma, except that in former both the primary ovarian tumor as well as the thyroid gland should be removed, so that 131I therapy can be administered under hypothyroid conditions (13, 14, 15, 16, 17). Very rarely, however, the metastatic deposits from a malignant struma may produce sufficient amounts of TH to maintain serum TSH levels near or even below normal after removal of the primary ovarian tumor and thyroidectomy (hypersecretory tumors) [one of the cases described by Hasleton et al. (5) and case 8 reported by Kempers et al. (11)]. In such cases, the treatment of metastatic disease with 131I can be suboptimal due to low iodine uptake by the residual tumor.

The iodine uptake by metastases in most cases of thyroid carcinomas is quite low, but is increased significantly under the stimulation of TSH during a hypothyroid period before 131I treatment (18). In cases of thyroid cancer metastases producing excess TH, the optimal way to effectively achieve a cytotoxic concentration of 131I per gram of tumor has not been defined (19, 20, 21). Approaches to this problem might include stimulation with: 1). endogenous TSH after short-term administration of an antithyroidal drug (22); 2) oral TRH (23); and 3) recombinant human TSH (rhTSH) (24, 25, 26) to optimize TSH levels for 131I scanning and therapy. In the past, bovine TSH had also been used toward the latter aim (27, 28, 29), but is no longer available. Finally, it is possible that at least some hypersecretory thyroid carcinomas may show sufficient iodine uptake at baseline to permit empirical high-dose 131I therapy (dose range, 150–200 mCi) without the need of additional stimulation by high TSH levels; however, the efficacy of such a therapeutic protocol has not been formally studied.

We herewith describe the use of rhTSH in the context of both pretreatment lesion dosimetry and 131I therapy for the management of hypersecretory metastases in an uncommon case of malignant struma ovarii. We also discuss the potential general role of combining rhTSH administration with pretreatment lesion dosimetric analysis in the treatment of thyroid cancer metastases that hypersecrete TH.


    Case Report
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Report
 Method of Determination of...
 References
 
Initial presentation, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment

A 46-yr-old woman presented with constipation and vague abdominal pain. Computed tomography, performed with iodinated iv radiographic contrast, showed a multicystic left lower abdominal mass, as well as multiple hepatic masses. At laparotomy a 20 x 18 x 17-cm mass arising from the left ovary was removed; the tumor did not invade surrounding tissues. The ovarian mass was a follicular thyroid carcinoma associated with a small area of apparently normal thyroid tissue. An intraoperative biopsy of one of the liver masses showed metastatic well-differentiated follicular thyroid carcinoma. Four weeks later, a total thyroidectomy was performed. Notably, an iodine-containing preparation was used for skin cleansing prior to both operative procedures. The resected thyroid gland had normal histology, except for a 0.5-cm follicular adenoma; there was no evidence of malignancy. After thyroidectomy, despite no supplemental TH therapy, the patient remained clinically euthyroid; biochemically, there was only a slight decrease in serum T4, which, however, remained within the normal range, as well as an elevation in serum TSH, which increased slightly above the upper limit of the normal range (Table 1Go). Despite the extensive metastatic liver disease (occupying approximately 10% of the mass of the organ), 131I was not administered due to the concern that the suboptimal increase in serum TSH would preclude effective therapy, as well as concerns about radiation-induced liver toxicity. Six months later, the patient was referred to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) for 131I treatment.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Thyroid function tests and Tg levels prior to 131I treatment

 
At the time of her admission to NIH, the patient was not taking TH, but appeared clinically euthyroid. She had also been on a low-iodine diet for 2 weeks before admission. Except for obesity (body mass index, 40.0 Kg/m2), as well as pelvic and neck surgical scars, the physical examination was unremarkable. Computed tomography of the chest and brain (performed without iodinated iv radiographic contrast), as well as a 99 mTc -MDP bone scan, were negative for metastatic lesions. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the abdomen showed multiple large lesions throughout the liver (maximal diameter of 4 cm). The patient’s thyroid function tests were consistent with mild hypothyroidism (Table 1Go). Serum thyroglobulin (Tg) was highly elevated, consistent with the large mass of metastatic disease in the liver (Table 1Go). This was in the absence of serum anti-Tg antibodies, which actually remained negative at all time points during the patient’s evaluation. The patient’s thyroid function indices were measured using the following methods: T4, competitive electrochemiluminescent immunoassay; and TSH, two-site "sandwich" electrochemiluminescent immunoassay. The T4 and TSH assays were performed on an Elecys 2010 immunoassay analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN). Serum Tg was measured using the OptiQuant Thyroglobulin RIA kit (Kronus, San Clemente, CA; assay performed at Mayo Medical Labs, Rochester, MN). The baseline uptake of radioiodine (either 123I or 131I) by the metastases was not assessed at that point. Urinary free iodine daily excretion was 45 µg/day (normal range, 100–460 µg/day).


    Method of Determination of the "Minimal Effective" 131I Therapy Dose (Using rhTSH and Lesion Dosimetry)
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Report
 Method of Determination of...
 References
 
To further increase the patient’s TSH to an optimal level and maximize the iodine uptake by the metastatic tumors prior to a 131I whole body scan (WBS), two consecutive daily doses of rhTSH (Thyrogen), 0.9 mg each, were administered im. Twenty-four h after the second rhTSH dose, a tracer dose (4.759 mCi) of 131I was administered for a diagnostic WBS, which was performed 48 h later. These images showed that almost all of the tracer activity had located in the hepatic metastases. A small amount of activity was detected in the thyroid remnant. The scans showed no evidence of metastases outside of the liver. The serum TSH and Tg responses to rhTSH are shown in Fig. 1Go. Serum T3 reached a maximum level of 310 ng/mL from a baseline of 157 ng/mL 48 h after the second rhTSH dose (normal range, 75–170 ng/mL), whereas T4 increased from a baseline of 5.2 µg/dL to 6.7 µg/dL 72 h after the second rhTSH dose (normal range, 4.5–11.0 µg/dL).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Serum TSH and Tg responses to rhTSH around the time of the administration of a tracer dose of 131I. The time points indicated by the symbols over the arrows represent the following: *, administration of rhTSH, 0.9 mg im daily; **, administration of 5 mCi of 131I for diagnostic WBS; ***, performance of diagnostic WBS.

 
Because of the wide distribution of the patient’s metastases and their location within a radiosensitive organ (liver) (30, 31, 32, 33), we decided to determine the minimal 131I dose that would provide effective treatment (34). Thus, lesion dosimetry was performed to calculate the administered dose of 131I that would deliver approximately 8000 rad to the metastases with lower iodine uptake (34, 35, 36, 37). Images for these studies were acquired with a dual-headed gamma camera (BIAD; Trionix Research Laboratory, Twinsburg, OH) equipped with a high-energy collimator. Before administration of the tracer dose of 131I, a transmission scan of the patient’s hepatic area was acquired using a flood source containing 25 mCi of 99 mTc pertechnetate and a 20% energy window centered at 140 keV. To minimize scatter, the source was covered with a low-energy, high-sensitivity parallel hole collimator. A second blank scan was also obtained with the same camera settings, but without the patient. At 6–168 h after administration of a tracer dose of 131I (4.759 mCi), conjugate view gamma camera images (simultaneous anterior and posterior images) of the liver were obtained, which corresponded to the transmission scan. For each scan, the patient was positioned using a laser alignment system. Separate energy windows, a 20% window centered at 364 keV and a 10% window centered at 310 keV, were used for simultaneous photopeak and scatter image acquisition. A 100 µCi 131I standard in a Plexiglas (Elf Atochem N.A., Philadelphia, PA) phantom was also imaged. The 99 mTc images were used to calculate the attenuation factor for each point (pixel) using the formula: blank image counts/transmission image counts = eµd, where µ is the linear attenuation coefficient for 99 mTc (0.153 cm-1) and d is the thickness of the patient’s tissues at that point. The 131I attenuation factors were calculated by scaling the 99 mTc data using the linear attenuation coefficient of 131I (0.109 cm-1) (38, 39). Geometric mean images [(anterior x posterior)1/2] were derived from the conjugate view images of the patient’s liver and the 131I standard and then corrected for tissue attenuation and photon scatter using a modified dual-energy scatter correction procedure (40). Similar corrections were applied to the 131I standard, except in this instance the dimensions of the phantom were known. Using the standard data, the geometric images from the patient were scaled to microCuries (µCi). In the geometric mean images, 17 discrete metastatic lesions were identified in the liver (Fig. 2Go). Regions of interest were drawn around the perimeter of each lesion to determine the µCi of 131I that each contained. Background activity was determined by drawing regions of interest in the hepatic parenchyma outside the areas of the lesions. The turnover and half-life (t1/2) of 131I in each lesion was obtained by fitting a single exponential function to the 24–168 h data.



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Digitized conjugate view images of the liver lesions derived from counts obtained during lesion dosimetry 48 h following 5 mCi of 131I. The lesions are encircled and numbered 1–17.

 
The volumes of the hepatic lesions were determined from short-inversion-time inversion-recovery sequence MRI sections of the liver. Using an in-house image analysis program (Mirage), the areas of the lesions on each MRI section were determined. Total lesion volume was calculated by summing the areas for each lesion and multiplying by the number and thickness of the sections.

The data analysis showed that the hepatic metastases accumulated 78% of the administered 131I at 24 h posttracer administration, accounting for almost all of the whole body retention of the radionuclide. After 24 h, the biological half-life (t1/2 biol) of 131I activity in the whole body was longer than 55 days, so that there was extremely avid retention of iodine by the hepatic lesions with minimal secretion and/or release of 131I. The percent 131I uptake and volumes of the various lesions are shown in Fig. 3Go. The percent 131I uptake in the lesions varied from 1.8 to 12.2%, with an average of 4.5% per lesion. In Fig. 3Go, lesions 3, 4, and 7 were analyzed in combination and had a cumulative uptake of 23.6%. Lesion volumes ranged from 7–62 mL, with an average of 24 mL per lesion. Again, in Fig. 3Go, lesions 3, 4, and 7 were considered in combination and had a cumulative volume of 94.5 mL. The total volume of metastatic lesions was 396.7 mL, which accounted for approximately 11.8% of the mass of the liver (3373 mL). There was a strong correlation between percent 131I uptake and lesion volume (r = +0.87, P < 0.001), which implied that the various metastatic foci had similar avidity for 131I. Percent 131I uptake corrected for the mass of each lesion, assuming average tissue density of 1 g/mL, varied from 0.07%/g tissue to 0.34%/g tissue, with an average of 0.13%/g tissue per lesion (P > 0.05 for differerences among these values by Student’s t test). The biological half-life (t1/2 biol) of 131I in the various lesions ranged from 9.8 days to infinite time. The corresponding effective half-life (t1/2 eff) of 131I was subsequently calculated using the formula 1/t1/2 eff = (1/t1/2 biol) + (1/t1/2 phys), where t1/2 phys represents the physical half-life of 131I (8.04 days). The t1/2 eff ranged from 4.4–8.04 days, with an average of 6.2 days. For 6 of the 17 lesions, the t1/2 biol was extremely long and, thus, the t1/2 eff was practically identical to t1/2 phys. These values of both t1/2 eff and t1/2 biol were exceptionally high in comparison with those observed in most thyroid carcinomas (41, 42), reflecting a high retention and very lengthy time of residence of 131I within the metastases in our case. From these data, the values of: 1) rad/µCi of 131I administered, and 2i) µCi needed to deliver 8000 rad were calculated for each lesion. As shown in Fig. 4Go, if 65 mCi were administered, 15 of the 17 lesions would receive a radiation dose of at least 8000 rad. The predicted radiation doses to the lesions ranged from 6,300–27,000 rad.



View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Volumes (as assessed by MRI) and percent 131I uptake of the metastatic lesions.

 


View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Doses of 131I needed for the delivery of a radiation dose of greater than or equal to 8000 rad to each lesion. By using 65 mCi of 131I for therapy, 15 of 17 lesions would be exposed to a sufficient cytoreductive radiation dose (arrow).

 
The whole blood dosimetry was determined using the Memorial Sloan-Kettering method (43). Whole body 131I retention was determined by measuring patient activity with a gamma scintillation detector placed at 6 m away from the patient at 2, 4, 6, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h after the aministration of the 131I tracer dose. The patient did not void between the time of 131I administration and the 2 h count, so that the (physical decay-corrected) 2 h count was used as the 100% (baseline) value. Whole blood samples were obtained at the same time points and counted for 131I in a gamma well scintillation detector. The percentage of administered dose per liter of whole blood (% dose/L) was determined by comparing the blood counts to those of an 131I standard (131I-Hippuran), which was 1:5000 of the administered dose. There was a rapid clearance of activity from the blood with a t1/2 of 1.4 h. Whole body 131I retention had a t1/2 of 93.8 h; after 24 h the clearances of activity from the whole body and liver were virtually identical. The whole body and blood count data were fit with biexponential functions, which were then integrated to calculate the area under the curve for the 0 to 96 h period. The areas under the curve from 96 h to infinite time were calculated with a single exponential function taking into consideration the t1/2 phys of 131I (8.04 days). From the percentage of activity retained in the body over time (the gamma component of 131I) and the activity found in whole blood (the ß component of 131I) and using published dose constants, it was possible to calculate the absorbed radiation dose per mCi of administered 131I that would be received by whole blood (43, 44). From this it was determined that the largest activity of 131I that could be administered, so that blood absorbed radiation dose would not exceed 200 rad, would be 129 mCi. We decided to administer the lowest effective 131I dose (65 mCi) that could potentially eradicate the metastases and was also within the limits of safety.

Administration of 131I therapy and follow-up evaluation of therapeutic efficacy

Prior to the administration of the therapy dose of 131I, the patient was placed on metoprolol (150 mg/day) to avoid the development of clinically important thyrotoxic symptoms, in case posttreatment hyperthyroidism would develop due to release of preformed TH stored in the tumor. rhTSH was administered as before, and the 131I therapy dose (65 mCi) was administered 24 h after the second rhTSH dose. It is important to note that, as of yet, the United States Food and Drug Administration has not approved the use of rhTSH for the treatment of thyroid carcinoma. Hence, we obtained approval by the NIH Institutional Review Board for the administration of a therapeutic dose of 131I post-rhTSH. Our patient was included in a single-case protocol, and rhTSH was administered on a "compassionate exemption" basis. The pattern of serum TSH and Tg responses to rhTSH stimulation was similar to those observed after the first series of injections during dosimetry (data not shown). The posttherapy 131I uptake by the lesions was also calculated, and the value was similar to the one observed before therapy (72% uptake at 48 h). A posttherapy WBS identified no additional metastatic lesions. The patient received a blood radiation dose of 120.2 rad.

The patient’s course after the administration of therapy under rhTSH stimulation was uneventful. Although she experienced mild transient nausea, she did not develop radiation hepatitis (by either symptoms and signs of hepatic damage or increase in serum transaminase levels), thyrotoxicosis, or bone marrow suppression. She was maintained on a suppressive dose of TH. Four months after 131I therapy, and under TH suppression therapy, the patient’s serum Tg values were 2380 ng/mL, indicative of residual metastatic disease. Six months after the first 131I therapy, the patient was reevaluated by MRI of the liver, which showed significant reduction in the size of the metastatic lesions (Figs. 5Go and 6Go). The patient’s TH therapy was withdrawn in preparation for a follow-up tracer dose (approximately 5 mCi) 131I diagnostic WBS, whole body dosimetry, and repeat 131I high-dose therapy. At that point, there was still evidence of a minimal degree of TH secretion by the tumor, as 6 weeks after discontinuation of levothyroxine therapy the patient’s serum T4 was still detectable at 1.6 µg/dL (normal range, 4.5–11.0 µg/dL). The corresponding serum TSH was elevated, although not markedly so, at 31.3 µU/mL (normal range, 0.43–4.6 µU/mL). In fact, a more significant increase in serum TSH would be expected in the complete absence of hormonal secretion by the tumor. The serum Tg level was 26,025 ng/mL under the above conditions and was now considerably decreased compared to that seen before the first 131I treatment [70,700 ng/mL with a TSH level of 41.0 µU/mL (under rhTSH stimulation)]. A tracer dose 131I diagnostic WBS confirmed the existence of multiple hepatic metastases, without abnormalities in any other organs. Following whole body and blood dosimetry, the patient received her second 131I treatment with the maximally safe dose of 297 mCi. A posttherapy WBS was positive only for hepatic metastases. Our current treatment plan includes the repeat administration of maximally safe 131I doses following pretreatment whole body dosimetry under hypothyroid conditions to eradicate the remaining hepatic metastatic disease.



View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Representative MRI images of the response of the hepatic lesions to the first 131I therapy.

 


View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Volumes of the liver lesions by MRI 6 months after 131I therapy in comparison to their volumes before treatment. A significant decrease in volume is consistently documented for each lesion.

 
Discussion

Malignant struma ovarii is a rare disease representing approximately 5%–10% of all strumae (3, 4, 5, 6, 7) and 5% of ovarian malignant germ cell tumors (45). Due to its rarity and relatively good overall prognosis, its treatment has been debated, with some cases being treated with surgery alone (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 46). Only a small proportion of malignant strumae metastasize; hence, there are only 31 cases of metastatic struma documented in the literature (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 15, 16, 17). Metastatic disease from malignant struma ovarii has been managed with various modalities other than 131I, including ip chromic 32P phosphate (2) or radioactive colloidal gold (12), external beam radiotherapy (2, 3, 6), and extensive surgical debulking (47). However, since metastatic struma ovarii resembles metastatic thyroid carcinoma, a similar treatment protocol has been proposed for both. This includes surgical removal of the ovarian tumor and the thyroid gland, 131I ablative therapy, and suppressive TH therapy thereafter (13, 14, 15, 16, 17). Total thyroidectomy is advocated to enable effective 131I ablative treatment of the tumor and to facilitate follow-up with serial 131I diagnostic WBSs and serum Tg measurements. It also permits exclusion of a primary thyroid carcinoma.

In the case presented here, the metastatic deposits from the malignant struma ovarii were functional because they were able to produce TH. Hypersecretory thyroid cancer is uncommon, but may occasionally lead to overt thyrotoxicosis (20, 21, 22). When thyrotoxicosis is evident, distant metastases coexist in 83% of cases (20, 21). In our case, the highly functional metastases had pathological features of follicular carcinoma, in agreement with the reported pathology in most cases of thyroid carcinomas associated with production of high amounts of TH (21), but in direct contrast with most malignant strumae that present pathologically with features of papillary thyroid carcinoma (7). Hypersecretory thyroid cancer metastases are defined as the absence of hypothyroidism following thyroidectomy and/or the suppression of 131I uptake by the normal thyroid remnant in the presence of demonstrable uptake by the metastatic lesions (20). Using the above criteria, in a review of 40 cases with metastatic thyroid carcinoma and thyrotoxicosis, only 25 cases have been reported as harboring functional metastases (21). Notably, estimates of the iodine-concentrating efficiency of highly functioning thyroid cancer metastases (in percent uptake/g of tissue) have been reported at 10% of that of normal thyroid tissue. Therefore, thyrotoxicosis or euthyroidism after thyroidectomy usually result from large metastases, which could reach a cumulative weight of 2–3 kg (20), in direct similarity to our case where the total volume of metastatic disease was rather high (396.7 mL).

Interestingly, most functional thyroid cancer metastases produce predominantly T3. The potential underlying mechanisms responsible for this effect could be either preferential T3 production or accelerated peripheral conversion of T4 to T3 (21). Another possibility could also include a "defect" in the structure of intratumoral Tg with rapid removal of the molecule from the iodination site. Likewise, our patient presented with such a "T3 predominance," which was further accentuated after rhTSH stimulation.

Our case raises the challenging issue of how to optimally treat thyroid cancer metastases that are hormonally active. Although most thyroid cancer patients are currently treated with "standard" fixed amounts of 131I (19, 48, 49, 50, 51), it should be recognized that this approach has been used because it is simple and for most patients has proven to be effective and relatively safe. Patients with widespread or multiple metastases, however, present a more difficult challenge, and one approach is to administer the largest possible amount of 131I that will be safe for the patient based on estimates of blood, whole body, and lung radiation (43, 44). This "maximal safe dose" method, however, does not guarantee that the treatment will be effective. Nor does it guarantee that patients will receive an amount of 131I that is not excessive for effective treatment of their tumor. For adequately addressing these two questions, one needs to determine the radiation dose that will actually be received by the tumor, an estimate that requires lesion dosimetry (i.e. measurement of 131I uptake and retention), as well as the volume of the tumor (35, 36, 37, 41, 52). Maxon et al. (34, 37) have shown that absorbed radiation doses greater than 8000 rad to metastatic thyroid cancer lesions are likely to eradicate them. Although lesion dosimetry is currently not widely available, as few centers have expertise in its performance, 131I therapy based on lesion dosimetry has several benefits over therapy using "standard" arbitrary 131I amounts. These benefits include: 1) minimization of whole body radiation exposure (53); 2) increased probability that the lesion will be eradicated (37); and 3) help with decision-making whether to withhold theatment when the radiation dose to the lesion(s) is too low for effective therapy (i.e. <3500 rad) (34). With regard to the contribution of lesion dosimetry to therapeutic efficacy in our case, we believe that it added a significant benefit as serum Tg levels declined substantially after 131I therapy. We consider the clinical response in this case to be an "extensive partial response" by oncological criteria. In our case, the need for aggressive treatment with the administration of a maximally safe dose of 131I during the first 131I therapy is substantiated by the extent and multifocality of the metastatic disease, as well as the indeterminate prognosis at presentation [because of the rarity of the tumor features (i.e. metastatic hypersecretory thyroid cancer arising from a struma ovarii) with multiple hepatic metastases].

The additional value of whole body and blood dosimetry performed along with lesional dosimetry is to allow delivery of a dose of 131I that is within safety limits (43, 44). In our case, we wanted to minimize the probability of the following potential side effects of 131I therapy: 1) acute radiation-induced hepatitis (30, 31, 32, 33), and 2) release of pools of stored TH from the destruction of hormonally active bulky metastases, which could lead to thyroid storm. Another potential side effect of the treatment could be the unpredictable release of radioactive iodoproteins from the tumor with long half-life, which could lead to radiation toxicity to the bone marrow (41, 54). This is an idiosyncratic event, for which whole body and blood dosimetry could not be of predictive value. With regard to the possibility of radiation hepatitis, most data has been gathered by studies investigating the tolerance of the liver to external beam irradiation. The safety limit for radiation delivered to the whole organ is approx. 3700 rad (30, 31, 32, 33, 55), although other studies have shown that hepatic exposures of up to 10,000 rad could be tolerated if the dose is delivered internally rather than by external beam (56, 57). Although we did not calculate the whole organ exposure of our patient’s liver following administration of 65 mCi, it was estimated that this would be far below 10,000 rad. In fact, this assumption was proven true post hoc, as no evidence of radiation hepatitis was seen after treatment (no signs and symptoms of liver damage and absence of increase in serum transaminase levels).

In our case, no "baseline" value for uptake of 131I by the hepatic metastases was documented. In fact, because these lesions were highly functional and presented with a markedly prolonged t1/2 biol for 131I, it remains indeterminate whether the administration of rhTSH led to a significantly increased iodine uptake over baseline. An 131I treatment protocol involving whole body and lesional dosimetry, but without the use of rhTSH, may have also been effective in inducing a measurable therapeutic effect. Although rhTSH has been shown to be effective in increasing 131I uptake in diagnostic WBSs of thyroid carcinoma patients (58, 59), and, in certain instances, has also been used for treatment with 131I (24, 25, 26), it is impossible to validate our assumption that rhTSH increased 131I uptake in our case. Intuitively, however, we believe that our approach involving rhTSH administration resulted in an increased therapeutic effect.

In summary, our patient presented with bulky, hormonally active liver metastases with a high 131I uptake/g of tissue and a markedly prolonged 131I t1/2 biol (and consequently very long t1/2 eff). Hence, treating our patient with a "standard" 131I dose could have been either unsafe or suboptimal. Whole body and lesion dosimetry assured the delivery of an effective and safe dose. In addition, the inability of our patient to raise her endogenous TSH levels was overcome by using rhTSH, aiming to stimulate 131I uptake.

To our knowledge, this is the first case in which rhTSH administration was used in conjunction with lesion dosimetry to ensure efficacious treatment of hormonally active (highly functional) thyroid carcinoma metastases. The same therapeutic approach could be potentially be of general use for the treatment of patients with hypersecretory metastatic thyroid cancer.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. Jacob Robbins (National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney Diseases, NIH) for his valuable insights on the treatment plan for our patient, as well as his helpful comments and suggestions. Dr. Nicholas Patronas (Radiology Department, Clinical Center, NIH) assisted with the volumetric analysis of data obtained by MRI, while Achilles Neria and Angela Stuber offered technical assistance in performing the131I dosimetry studies. We are grateful for their contributions.


    Footnotes
 
This paper was presented in part at the 71st Annual Meeting of the American Thyroid Association, Portland, Oregon, 1998.

Received June 18, 1999.

Revised September 9, 1999.

Accepted September 16, 1999.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case Report
 Method of Determination of...
 References
 

  1. Nieminen U, von Numers C, Windholm O. 1963 Struma ovarii. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 42:399–424.
  2. Woodruff JD, Rauh JT, Markley RL. 1966 Ovarian struma. Obstet Gynecol. 27:194–201.[Medline]
  3. Gonzalez-Angulo A, Kaufman RH, Braungardt CD, Chapman FC, Hinshaw AJ. 1963 Adenocarcinoma of thyroid arising in struma ovarii (malignant struma ovarii). Report of two cases and review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol. 21:567–576.[Medline]
  4. Yannopoulos D, Yannopoulos K, Ossowski R. 1976 Malignant struma ovarii. Pathol Annu. 11:403–413.[Medline]
  5. Hasleton PHS, Kelehan P, Whittaker JS, Burslem RW, Turner L. 1978 Benign and malignant struma ovarii. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 102:180–184.[Medline]
  6. Pardo-Mindan FJ, Vazquez JJ. 1983 Malignant struma ovarii. Light and electron microscopic study. Cancer. 51:337–343.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Devaney K, Snyder R, Norris HJ, Tavassoli FA. 1993 Proliferative and histologically malignant struma ovarii: a clinicopathological study of 54 cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 12:333–343.[Medline]
  8. Beghella V, Ngadiman S, Rosenberg H, Hoda S, Zuna RE. 1997 Malignant struma ovarii. A case report and review of the literature. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 43:68–72.[Medline]
  9. O’Connell MEA, Fisher C, Harmer CL. 1990 Malignant struma ovarii: presentation and management. Br J Radiol. 63:360–363.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Yeh E-L, Meade RC, Ruetz PP. 1973 Radionuclide study of struma ovarii. J Nucl Med. 14:118–121.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Kempers RD, Dockerty MB, Hoffman DL, Bartholomew LG. 1970 Struma ovarii-ascitic, hyperthyroid, and asymptomatic syndromes. Ann Intern Med. 72:883–893.
  12. Rosenblum NG, LiVolsi VA, Edmonds PR, Mikuta JJ. 1989 Malignant struma ovarii. Gynecol Oncol. 32:224–227.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Willemse PH, Oosterhuis JW, Aalders JG, et al. 1987 Malignant struma ovarii treated by ovariectomy, thyroidectomy and 131I administration. Cancer. 60:178–182.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Vadmal MS, Smilari TF, Lovecchio JL, Klein I, Hadju SI. 1997 Diagnosis and treatment of disseminated struma ovarii with malignant transformation. Gynecol Oncol. 64:541–546:1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Tennvall J, Ljungberg O, Hsgberg T. 1997 "Malignant struma ovarii" with peritoneal dissemination. Histopathology. 31:289–290.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Thomas RD, Batty VB. 1992 Metastatic malignant struma ovarii. Two case reports. Clin Nucl Med. 17:577–578.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Brenner W, Bohuslavizki KH, Wolf H, Sippel C, Clausen M, Henze E. 1996 Radiotherapy with iodine-131 in recurrent malignant struma ovarii. Eur J Nucl Med. 23:91–94 (and related correspondence by Mango L, Filesi M, Ronga G, 1997 Eur J Nucl Med. 24:233–234).[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Beierwaltes WH. 1978 The treatment of thyroid carcinoma with radioactive iodine. Semin Nucl Med. 8:79–94.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Studer H, Veraguth P, Wyss F. 1961 Thyrotoxicosis due to solitary hepatic metastases from thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol. 21:1334–1338.
  20. Paul SJ, Sisson JC. 1990 Thyrotoxicosis caused by thyroid cancer. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 19:593–612.[Medline]
  21. Kabadi UD, Albin J. 1978 T3 euthyroidism in follicular thyroid carcinoma. Ann Intern Med. 88:359–360.
  22. Rall JE, Miller WN, Foster CG, Peacock WC, Rawson RW. 1951 Use of thiouracil in treatment of metastatic carcinoma of the thyroid with radioiodine. J Clin Endocrinol. 11:1273–1280.
  23. Gershengorn MC, Weintraub BD, Robbins J. 1976 Response to oral thyrotropin releasing hormone in athyreotic patients with thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid Res. XII:575–578.
  24. Rudavsky AZ, Freeman LM. 1997 Treatment of scan negative, thyroglobulin positive metastatic thyroid cancer using radioiodine 131I and recombinant human thyroid stimulating hormone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 82:11–14.[Free Full Text]
  25. Ringel MD, Ladenson PW. 1996 Diagnostic accuracy of 131I scanning with recombinant human thyrotropin vs. thyroid hormone withdrawal in a patient with metastatic thyroid carcinoma and hypopituitarism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:1724–1725.[Abstract]
  26. Chiu AC, Delpassand ES, Sherman SI. 1997 Prognosis and treatment of brain metastases in thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 82:3637–3642.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Sturgeon CT, Davis FE, Catz B, Petit D, Starr P. 1953 Treatment of thyroid cancer metastases with TSH and I-131 during thyroid hormone medication. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 13:1391–1407.
  28. Benua RS, Sonenberg RS, Leeper RD, Rawson RW. 1964 An 18 year study of the use of beef thyrotropin to increase I-131 uptake in metastatic thyroid cancer. J Nucl Med. 5:796–801.
  29. Hershman JM, Edwards L. 1972 Serum thyrotropin (TSH) levels after thyroid ablation compared with TSH level after exogenous bovine TSH: implications for I-131 treatment of thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 34:814–818.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Feigen M, Lavrin L, Mameghan H, Peters L. 1983 Radiation hepatitis following moving strip radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 9:397–400.[Medline]
  31. Ingold JA, Reed GB, Kaplan HS, Bagshaw MA. 1965 Radiation hepatitis. Am J Roentgenol. 93:200–208.
  32. Phillips R, Karnofsky DA, Hamilton LD, Nickson JJ. 1954 Roentgen therapy of hepatic metastases. Am J Roentgenol. 71:826–834.
  33. Wharton JT, Delclos L, Gallager S, Smith JP. 1973 Radiation hepatitis induced by abdominal irradiation with the cobalt 60 moving strip technique. Am J Roentgenol. 117:73–80.[Abstract]
  34. Maxon III HR, Thomas SR, Hertzberg VS, et al. 1983 Relation between effective radiation dose and outcome of radioiodine therapy for thyroid cancer. N Engl J Med. 309:937–941.[Abstract]
  35. Reynolds JC. 1997 Percent 131I uptake and post-therapy 131I scans: their role in the management of thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 7:281–284.[Medline]
  36. Thomas SR, Maxon HR III, Kereiakes JG. 1976 In vivo quantitation of lesion radioactivity using external counting methods. Med Phys. 3:253–255.
  37. Maxon III HR, Englaro EE, Thomas SR, et al. 1992 Radioiodine-131 therapy for well differentiated thyroid cancer–a quantitative radiation dosimetric approach: outcome and validation in 85 patients. J Nucl Med. 33:1132–1136.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Koral KF, Zasadny KR, Kessler ML, et al. 1994 CT-SPECT fusion plus conjugate views for determining dosimetry in iodine-131-monoclonal antibody therapy of lymphoma patients. J Nucl Med. 35:1714–1720.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Nickoloff EL, Perman WH, Esser PD, Bashist B, Alderson PO. 1984 Left ventricular volume: physical basis for attenuation corrections in radionuclide determinations. Radiology. 152:511–515.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Choi CW, Barker WC, Buvat I, Carrasquillo JA, Bacharach SL. 1997 Implications of dual-energy-window (DEW) scatter correction inaccuracies for In-111 quantitative geometric mean imaging. Nucl Med Commun. 18:79–86.[Medline]
  41. Gershengorn MC, Izumi M, Robbins J. 1976 Use of lithium as an adjunct to radioiodine therapy of thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 42:105–111.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Schlesinger T, Flower MA, McCready VR. 1989 Radiation dose assessments in radioiodine (131I) therapy. 1. The necessity for in vivo quantitation and dosimetry in the treatment of carcinoma of the thyroid. Radiother Oncol. 14:35–41.[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Benua RS, Cicale NR, Sonenberg M, Rawson RW. 1962 The relation of radioiodine dosimetry to results and complications in the treatment of metastatic thyroid cancer. Am J Roentgenol. 87:171–182.
  44. Rall JE, Foster CG, Robbins J, Lazerson R, Farr LE, Rawson RW. 1953 Dosimetric considerations in determining hematopoietic damage from radioactive iodine. Am J Roentgenol. 70:274–282.
  45. Piura B, Dgani R, Nemet D, Yanai-Inbar I, Cohen Y, Glezerman M. 1995 Malignant germ cell tumors of the ovary: a study of 20 cases. J Surg Oncol. 59:155–161.[Medline]
  46. Zakhem A, Aftimos G, Kreidy R, Salem P. 1990 Malignant struma ovarii: report of two cases and selected review of the literature. J Surg Oncol. 43:61–65.[Medline]
  47. Lee SL, Behrman RH, Roy MP, Haag BL. The role of debulking metastases prior to I-131 therapy of widely metastatic follicular thyroid carcinoma derived from a struma ovarii. Proc 79th Annual Meeting of The Endocrine Society, New Orleans, LA, 1998 (Abstract P2–593, p 373).
  48. McCowan KD, Adler RA, Ghaed N, Verdon T, Hofeldt FD. 1976 Low dose radioiodine ablation in postsurgical patients with thyroid cancer. Am J Med. 61:52–58.[CrossRef][Medline]
  49. Krishnamurthy GT, Blahd WH. 1977 Radioiodine I-131 therapy in the management of thyroid cancer: a prospective study. Cancer. 40:195–202.[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. Varma VM, Beierwaltes WH, Nofal MM, Nishiyama RH, Copp JE. 1970 Treatment of thyroid cancer: death rates after surgery and after surgery followed by sodium iodine I-131. JAMA. 214:1437–1442.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Beierwaltes WH, Nishiyama RH, Thompson NW, Copp JE, Kubo A. 1982 Survival time and "cure" in papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma with distant metastases: statistics following University of Michigan therapy. J Nucl Med. 23:561–568.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Reynolds JC, Robbins J. 1997 The changing role of radioiodine in the managenent of differentiated thyroid cancer. Semin Nucl Med. 27:152–164.[CrossRef][Medline]
  53. Van Nostrand D, Neutze J, Atkins F. 1986 Side effects of "rational dose" iodine therapy for metastatic well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma. J Nucl Med. 27:1519–1527.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Rawson RW, Rall JE, Peacock W. 1951 Limitations and indications in the treatment of cancer of the thyroid with radioactive iodine. J Clin Endocrinol. 11:1128–1142.
  55. Lawrence TS, Ten Haken RK, Kessler ML, et al. 1992 The use of 3-D dose volume analysis to predict radiation hepatitis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 23:781–788.[Medline]
  56. Wollner I, Knutsen C, Smith P, et al. 1988 Effects of hepatic arterial Yttrium 90 glass microspheres in dogs. Cancer. 61:1336–1344.[CrossRef][Medline]
  57. Wang S, Quadri SM, Tang XZ, et al. 1995 Liver toxicity induced by combined external-beam irradiation and radioimmunoglobulin therapy. Radiat Res. 141:294–302.[Medline]
  58. Meier CA, Braverman LE, Ebner SA, et al. 1994 Diagnostic use of recombinant human thyrotropin in patients with thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 78:188–196.[Abstract]
  59. Ladenson PW, Braverman LE, Mazzaferri EL, Brucker-Davis F, Cooper DS, Garber JR, Wondisford FE, Davies TF, DeGroot LJ, Daniels GH, Ross DS, Weintraub BD. 1997 Comparison of administration of recombinant human thyrotropin with withdrawal of thyroid hormone for radioactive iodine scanning in patients with thyroid carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 337:888–896.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
M. Luster, F. Lippi, B. Jarzab, P. Perros, M. Lassmann, C. Reiners, and F. Pacini
rhTSH-aided radioiodine ablation and treatment of differentiated thyroid carcinoma: a comprehensive review
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, March 1, 2005; 12(1): 49 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
B. de Keizer, A. Hoekstra, M. W. Konijnenberg, F. de Vos, B. Lambert, P. P. van Rijk, C. J.M. Lips, and J. M.H. de Klerk
Bone Marrow Dosimetry and Safety of High 131I Activities Given After Recombinant Human Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone to Treat Metastatic Differentiated Thyroid Cancer
J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2004; 45(9): 1549 - 1554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. J. Robbins and A. K. Robbins
Recombinant Human Thyrotropin and Thyroid Cancer Management
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2003; 88(5): 1933 - 1938.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. Als, P. Gedeon, H. Rosler, C. Minder, P. Netzer, and J. A. Laissue
Survival Analysis of 19 Patients with Toxic Thyroid Carcinoma
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2002; 87(9): 4122 - 4127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rotman-Pikielny, P.
Right arrow Articles by Sarlis, N. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rotman-Pikielny, P.
Right arrow Articles by Sarlis, N. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals