help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Newfield, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by New, M. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Newfield, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by New, M. I.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 85, No. 1 14-21
Copyright © 2000 by The Endocrine Society


From The Clinical Research Centers

Normocortisolemic Cushing’s Syndrome Initially Presenting with Increased Glucocorticoid Receptor Numbers1

Ron S. Newfield, George Kalaitzoglou2, Teresa Licholai, David Chilton, Javed Ashraf, E. Brad Thompson and Maria I. New

Department of Pediatrics, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York Weill Cornell Center (R.S.N., G.K., T.L., M.I.N.), New York, New York 10021; and Department of Human Biological Chemistry and Genetics (D.C., J.A., E.B.T.), University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB), Galveston, Texas

Address correspondence and requests for reprints to: Maria I. New, M.D., Professor and Chairman, Department of Pediatrics, Chief, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Harold and Percy Uris Professor of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, 525 East 68th Street, Room M-622, New York, New York 10021. E-mail: minew{at}mail.med.cornell.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Case History
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
A girl who developed Cushingoid features in peripuberty, but was eucortisolemic, was previously reported to have markedly elevated lymphocyte glucocorticoid receptor sites per cell with normal binding affinity as a potential cause of her phenotype. Her circadian rhythm of cortisol and pituitary-adrenal axis were initially intact, but later proved to be dysregulated. The patient presented at age 10.8 yr with centripetal obesity, moon facies, buffalo hump, and purple striae, but no statural stunting, which is a cardinal sign of Cushing’s syndrome. At 11.5 yr she suffered a compression fracture of the L1 vertebra. That prompted treatment with the antiprogestin drug mifepristone (RU486), which was administered at high dose to achieve an antiglucocorticoid effect. From ages 13.75 yr through 15.5 yr, RU486 was administered in various intervals to suppress her Cushingoid features. Once RU486 was introduced, however, a consistent correlation over time between the Cushingoid features and glucocorticoid receptor sites per cell was no longer observed. However, the number of glucocorticoid receptor sites per cell tended to decrease in response to administering RU486. Ultimately, her Cushingoid phenotype proved to be transient.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Case History
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
CUSHING’S syndrome is a disorder resulting from increased adrenocortical secretion of cortisol (or from exogenous excess of glucocorticoids) and is characterized by truncal obesity, moon face, abdominal striae, protein catabolism, decreased carbohydrate tolerance, osteoporosis, and often also acne, hypertension, psychiatric disturbances, and, in females, amenorrhea and hirsutism.

In this study, we describe a girl who developed Cushingoid features in peripuberty and was eucortisolemic. There was no history of exogenous administration of topical, inhaled, or systemic glucocorticoids. She was previously shown to have markedly elevated lymphocyte glucocorticoid receptors (GR) with normal binding affinity to dexamethasone (1), which was speculated to be a potential cause of her phenotype. However, serum cortisol levels were not decreased, and her hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis was intermittently dysregulated. This is unlike the intact HPA axis observed in the condition of differential response to thyroid hormones at peripheral vs. hypothalamic-pituitary tissue. Therefore, normal GR numbers at the pituitary, vs. elevated numbers peripherally, may not explain her condition entirely. Nonetheless, she had variable tissue responsivity to glucocorticoids and presented at age 10.8 yr with centripetal obesity, moon facies, buffalo hump, and purple striae, but without easy bruising or statural stunting, which are two cardinal signs of Cushing’s disease in childhood. At 11.5 yr she suffered a compression fracture of the L1 vertebra. The antiglucocorticoid drug mifepristone (RU486) was subsequently administered in doses of 400 mg/day. Striae gradually resolved, and her buffalo hump, weight gain, and distribution improved in response to RU486, despite the up-regulation of the HPA axis and raised cortisol levels. Bone mineral density (BMD) did not improve. Once RU486 was introduced, however, a consistent correlation over time between the Cushingoid features and GR sites per cell was no longer observed. There was a correlation, however, between the number of GR sites and the administration of RU486. Ultimately, her Cushingoid phenotype proved to be transient. Although the precise etiology remains unknown, it is likely to involve the postreceptor transcription apparatus critical to glucocorticoid action.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Case History
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
Serum steroid hormone levels including cortisol, androgens, estradiol, and progesterone were measured at the New York-Presbyterian Hospital Steroid Core Laboratory, as previously described (2, 3, 4).

ACTH plasma levels were determined commercially by the Nichols Institute, initially as immunoradiometric assay, and most recently using a highly sensitive immuno-chemiluminescence assay. Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) test was performed by administering ovine CRF iv over 1 min (5); baseline and subsequent ACTH and/or cortisol levels were determined at 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 180 min after CRF injection.

The GR assays were performed on freshly collected, anticoagulated peripheral blood lymphocytes. Blood was put on ice and shipped overnight to UTMB (Galveston, TX). Within 24 h, the peripheral lymphocytes were separated on Ficoll-Hypaque gradients and assayed for GR binding sites by competitive binding assay, as described previously (6), with minor modifications. This whole cell-binding assay has been performed in our laboratory for 2 decades, producing consistent results with the CEM cell line. During this study, periodic assays on CEM cells validated the performance of the assay. Data for specific compatible binding was obtained at up to nine different concentrations of [3H]dexamethasone (2.5 nM to 175 nM) in each assay. GR affinity, expressed as apparent dissociation constant (Kd), and the number of specific dexamethasone binding sites per cell were derived via Scatchard plot analysis.

GR gene and promotor usage analysis

Using nine primers spanning the entire GR coding region as described (7), GR complementary DNA of the human GR was obtained after an initial reverse transcriptase reaction from total RNA derived from the patient’s lymphocytes and amplification by the PCR method. The resultant GR gene was sequenced in the UTMB analytical laboratory and found to be identical to that of the published normal GR gene (8). Quantitative PCR (using increasing amounts of competitor transcript of a deliberately mutated human GR) (9), was used to evaluate the level of GR messenger RNA (mRNA) isolated from the same lymphocytes used for the binding assays from our patient, and they were compared with a normal, age-matched female. The method was validated by observing that GR mRNA levels increase 3.4-fold after exposing the CEM-C7 human leukemic cell line to 1 mM dexamethasone. GR mRNA levels are known to be induced by glucocorticoids in this cell line (10, 11). Promoter usage was checked via PCR [sequence kindly provided by Dr. Jeff Harmon (Department of Pharmacology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD)], using a common 3' primer (between nucleotides 394 and 414 in exon 2) and four different 5' primers from noncoding exons (1A, 1B, 1C, and 1D). Both strands were sequenced. All sequencing was carried out in the UTMB DNA sequencing laboratory using an PE Applied Biosystems Sequencer (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).

BMD (g/cm2) was assessed via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (Lunar Corp., Madison, WI) at the spine and hip. Normal age-appropriate values were taken from published data on a large Australian cohort, which is of a similar ethnic background as our patient (12).


    Case History
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Case History
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
The patient, who is of Irish descent, first came to our attention at the age of 10 yr, 9 months when she presented with a history of progressive weight gain that had started at age 7, accompanied by development of moon facies, buffalo hump, and violaceous striae, but no easy bruising (see Fig. 1Go) or stunting of statural growth (Fig. 2Go). She had a mild learning disability. Physical examination revealed a normal blood pressure. The patient was in early puberty with breasts at Tanner stage III (B-III) and pubic hair at stage II (PH-II). Initial hormonal findings demonstrated that the patient was eucortisolemic, with an intact circadian rhythm of cortisol, normal 24-h urinary free cortisol, and an intact pituitary-adrenal axis as assessed by metyrapone test and low-dose dexamethasone suppression. Head magnetic resonance imaging and abdominal imaging were normal. An oral glucose tolerance test revealed marked insulin resistance (peak insulin >400 µU/mL). Bone age was 11 yr, and there was mild osteoporosis noted. As a child, the patient had bilateral wrist fractures at separate times and a finger fracture, all secondary to trauma.



View larger version (129K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Patient at presentation with Cushing’s phenotype, before RU486 treatment.

 


View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Growth curve of the patient before, during, and after RU486 treatment. Of note, there was no stunting of stature at presentation.

 
At age 11.5 yr her bone age was slightly advanced (12.5 yr). She suffered an acute vertebral compression fracture of the first lumbar vertebra (L1), and imaging revealed previous fractures at the thoracic spine (T8 and T9). BMD at the level of L2-L4 before any intervention was plotted on Australian norms based on the actual age (Fig. 3Go), revealing mild vertebral osteopenia. BMD at the femurs showed mild to moderate osteopenia. There was no statural stunting or detectable abnormality in bone formation, breakdown, or bone metabolism. Tests for metabolic or genetic bone diseases were normal, including serum PTH, alkaline phosphatase, calcium, phosphorus, and responses to calcium challenge, urinary excretion of calcium, phosphorus, and hydroxyproline. Osteogenesis imperfecta was ruled out specifically by studies on skin fibroblasts. Height velocity (6.34 cm/yr) and pubertal advancement were normal (B-III/IV, PH-III), whereas the patient gained an additional 6.2 kg (8.7 kg/yr), as shown in the growth curve (Fig. 2Go). Urinary free cortisol levels were not elevated (<70 µg/m2·24 h).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. The BMD of the patient at the lumbar spine level (L2-L4) before, during, and after RU486 treatment. The patient’s values are indicated by circled dots. In comparison, the normal values for Australian females by age are indicated by solid dots (mean ± 2 SD represented by the solid lines).

 
Markedly elevated GR sites per cell (peripheral lymphocytes) were found, with normal affinity for dexamethasone (Kd) per binding assay, and with a normal sequence of the GR complementary DNA. Owing to the osteopenia and vertebral fractures, a therapeutic trial of high-dose RU486 (400 mg/day) was initiated at the age of 13 yr, 9 months (approved by the Food and Drug Administration, IND#40,006). After receiving RU486 for 2 months, the violaceous striae improved, having faded in intensity (Table 1Go). A 3-week hiatus in therapy caused noticeable worsening in the striae and a 1.4-kg weight gain. Resuming RU486 caused total disappearance of violaceous striae and a mild weight reduction. At age 14 yr, 3 months (Table 1Go), therapy was withheld owing to persistent vaginal bleeding. Within 2 weeks the striae worsened as she gained 2.1 kg, and after 5–6 weeks the striae returned to their initial state. Oral contraceptive therapy (OCP) was instituted after an episode of heavy vaginal bleeding. Two menstrual cycles later, OCP therapy was discontinued by the parents following improvement; the vaginal bleeding then resumed. A new vertebral compression fracture occurred that prompted another course of RU486. At age 15 yr, 6 months, after 6 months of RU486 (400 mg/day), striae improved markedly, weight remained stable, and the buffalo hump became softer and smaller in size. Again, the patient experienced persistent vaginal bleeding and had one episode of dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Because the patient could not tolerate pelvic sonography, magnetic resonance imaging was carried out, showing a distended uterus filled with amorphous material that extended through the cervix into the proximal vagina (R. S. Newfield et al., submitted for publication). As anticipated, while still receiving RU486 (400 mg/day), no withdrawal bleeding occurred in response to a 10-day course of Provera (medroxyprogestrone acetate, 10 mg/day). Partial dilatation and curettage initiated shedding and contraction, and a biopsy revealed the uterine content to be benign endometrial hyperplasia. This was attributed to unopposed estrogen in the face of follicular phase levels of progesterone while on RU486 (Table 2Go) (R. S. Newfield et al., submitted for publication).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. BMD at the lumbar spine and right hip

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Summary of clinical parameters and GR studies

 
After discontinuing RU486 at age 15.5 yr, uterine size soon normalized, but vaginal bleeding persisted for 1 year. During that year without RU486 treatment, the Cushingoid state gradually resolved; striae disappeared, the buffalo hump became smaller, and weight loss occurred. For the first time, the patient’s face thinned and was less rounded. OCP therapy for irregular menstrual cycles was then initiated, which normalized the menses. Since then, further weight loss has taken place and Cushingoid features are no longer present (Fig. 3Go). After receiving OCP therapy for 15 months, it was discontinued. Because her menstruation was irregular for over a year after the discontinuation of OCP, they were readministered.

While receiving RU486, the patient experienced two other adverse effects that have been reported previously (13, 14, 15). The first was a transient erythematous rash that occurred 1 week after initiating therapy, which resolved while treatment continued. The second was mild Hashimoto’s thyroiditis occurring after months of therapy, with elevated antimicrosomal thyroid antibodies (1:1600 titer) and negative antithyroglobulin antibodies; T4 levels were low-normal (nadir of 4.5 ng/dL, normal range 4.5–11.0), with mildly elevated TSH levels (peak-7.3 mIU/mL, normal 0.4–4.0). Thyroid function tests returned to normal after withdrawal of RU486 therapy, but antimicrosomal thyroid antibodies remained elevated (as high as 1:6400 titer).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Case History
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
On presentation at age 10 yr, 9 months, the patient’s diurnal rhythm of cortisol and her pituitary-adrenal axis appeared normal. However, as detailed over a longer observation period (Table 3Go), these ultimately proved to be intermittently dysregulated. At age 11.7 yr, she exhibited a lack of response to CRF, which is probably not owed to a basal cortisol level of 19 µg/dL or to poor quality of the ovine CRF preparation, especially in view of the abnormal diurnal rhythm of cortisol at that time. At age 16.5 yr the response to the CRF test returned to normal. Nonetheless, even when the hormonal responses were abnormal, levels of free cortisol in multiple 24-hr urine collections were normal.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Hormonal values before RU486, between RU486 courses while off OCP, or during RU486 therapy

 
In response to RU486, ACTH levels rose markedly, with a more modest rise of cortisol and testosterone (Table 2Go). Progesterone levels, however, rose only slightly with RU486 treatment, but they remained in follicular phase levels. Estradiol levels were unaltered. Despite improvement of the patient’s striae, buffalo hump, and obesity in response to RU486, BMD did not increase (Fig. 3Go).

GR sites for dexamethasone per cell and their fluctuations throughout the course are presented in Table 1Go. In our studies, the normal number of GR sites per cell for nonobese (n = 12) and obese (n = 7) adolescent and young females was 5540 ± 878 and 11,078 ± 8057, with affinities (Kd) of 15.5 ± 6.7 nM and 33 ± 19.6 nM, respectively. Over 2 yr, five determinations of the patient’s GR sites per cell, before starting oral therapy with RU486 at the age of 13.8 yr, averaged 40,717 ± 16,191 (up to 63,241 sites/cell), with a mean Kd of 24.8 ± 7.5 nM. Analysis of these data by Scatchard plot showed evidence for a single, high-affinity site. A therapeutic trial with RU486 was initiated at high dose (400 mg/day) as an antiglucocorticoid agent. Results from three different GR assays done before and after RU486 was introduced, and the specific Scatchard plots from these assays, are shown in Fig. 4Go. In response to RU486, the purple striae gradually resolved and cortisol levels rose, while GR sites per cell dropped sharply to 5435 with a Kd of 36.2 nM. Treatment was then discontinued for 9 months owing to persistent vaginal bleeding. Without RU486 treatment, GR numbers remained normal, but striae soon reappeared. A few months later, GR numbers gradually rose to 17,032. Following her second vertebral fracture, RU486 was resumed and the striae again improved; however, BMD (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry) did not increase. Although RU486 was discontinued 5 months later, owing to massive endometrial hyperplasia (benign), the Cushingoid signs did not recur, even though her GR rose from 10,787 while receiving RU486 to 33,979 1 week after RU486 was discontinued and to 23,893 8 weeks after that. The lack of relapse within the first 1–2 weeks after withdrawal may be due to a residual blockade by RU486, owing to its long half-life of 30–48 h (16). Indeed, 2 weeks after the first extended withdrawal (period E), morning serum cortisol levels (33 µg/dL) were still elevated. Only at 3 weeks did they normalize. In period G, 1 week after the withdrawal of RU486, the morning cortisol level was still high (59.6 µg/dL) and, thus, precluded clinical relapse despite elevated GR (33, 979 sites/cell). However, by 8 weeks after RU486 had been withdrawn serum cortisol was normalized (9.8 µg/dL). Cushingoid signs did nor recur although GR were elevated (23, 893 sites/cell).



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. GR binding site analysis. Scatchard plots of binding data from three phases of the patient’s course. Top, Specific binding when the number of binding sites was high (during the initial workup). This assay revealed 63,000 sites/cell, Kd = 3.5 x 10-8 M, r = 0.9. Middle, Assay done 2 months after cessation of treatment with RU486; 15,000 sites/cell, Kd = 2.9 x 10-8 M, r = 0.98. Bottom, 3 months after cessation of RU486; 9,000 sites/cell, Kd = 1.1 x 10-8 M, r = 0.98.

 
After permanently discontinuing RU486 at age 15.56 yr, uterine size and endometrial stripe normalized. Over the next 2 yr, the patient gradually lost weight and BMD improved. The GR numbers gradually normalized and ranged between 6,593 and 17,293.

The GR promoter usage, established while the patient was off RU486, showed it to be the noncoding exon 1A, as in normal controls and in CEM-C7 cells. Even when our patient had normal GR site numbers/cell (period E), GR mRNA levels (145 pg/µg total RNA) were higher than in a control subject (90 pg/µg total RNA). In addition, there was not a linear correlation between GR site numbers and GR mRNA because a 2.4-fold rise in GR sites per cell (from 6,264 to 14,871) was only accompanied by a 1.2-fold rise in GR mRNA levels (from 145–175 pg/µg total RNA), suggesting a disordered posttranscriptional regulation of GR site numbers per cell.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Case History
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
This study describes an atypical case of Cushing’s syndrome in a Caucasian female who presented peripubertally with most of the classical signs of Cushing’s syndrome (e.g. centripetal obesity, buffalo hump, purple striae, osteoporosis, and spinal fractures) (Fig. 1Go). She did not manifest easy bruising or stunted growth, two cardinal signs of Cushing’s syndrome in children. Evidence for the latter is her growth pattern (Fig. 2Go), since commensurate with a rapid weight gain starting at age 7 that preceded puberty, her height velocity also increased. Her height predictions on presentation ranged between 160 and 161 cm (according to the Bayley-Pinneau and Roche-Wainer-Thissen methods) and are based on her bone age readings of 11 and 12.5 yr at chronological ages of 10.75 and 11.5 yr, respectively. Her final height of 161 cm is below her midparental target height of 167.5 cm, but it is only 2 cm below her father’s corrected height. Furthermore, unlike the average 8.9 cm height deficit (midparental–final height) in the group of 10 patients with Cushing’s syndrome reported by Magiakou et al. (17), where vertebral fractures were not described, a considerable part of the height deficit in this patient must be attributed to the multiple vertebral fractures she experienced. Therefore, we do not believe that her condition affected her stature in precisely the same way as described by Magiakou et al. (17).

She was normocortisolemic, yet on multiple occasions she demonstrated no diurnal rhythm typical of cortisol (Table 3Go). Nonetheless, she had normal urinary free cortisol levels. How can we explain this paradox?

In the initial years of clinical investigation of this patient, before the initiation of RU486 treatment, there was correlation of the Cushingoid phenotype with a markedly increased number of GR sites per cell in peripheral lymphocytes (up to 63,241), but with normal binding affinity for dexamethasone. The affinity we determined is very close to that reported by several other groups for normal peripheral blood lymphocytes (reviewed in Ref. 18) and to what we have observed in normal and leukemic lymphoid cells using the whole cell assay. Peripheral Cushingoid signs in the presence of nondepressed cortisol levels might have been explained by differential GC sensitivity at the peripheral vs. the hypothalamic-pituitary level either by tissue-specific differences in GR numbers or by hypothalamic desensitization. In vitro evidence demonstrated that for cells with no inherent blocks in their response pathways, elevating the quantity of GR causes enhanced responses to glucocorticoids (20, 21). Such a scenario of differential GC sensitivity would resemble the rare cases of differential resistance to thyroid hormones. However, the transient nature of this condition and an HPA axis that was intermittently dysregulated do not support the interpretation that the sole cause of the clinical picture was elevated GR levels. Of note, RU486 does not alter the diurnal rhythm of cortisol (13) and, thus, did not contribute to HPA axis dysregulation. Furthermore, after RU486 treatment was initiated, the first extended withdrawal of therapy (period E) resulted in a prompt clinical relapse (e.g. striae) without an abrupt rise in GR numbers in the peripheral lymphocytes. In contrast, on final discontinuation of RU486 (period G), Cushingoid signs did not reappear despite a rise in GR that persisted for 2 months. Thus, GR numbers and phenotype no longer correlated. Could this inconsistency over time between GR and phenotype simply reflect the fact that RU486 altered the basic characteristics and natural history of this condition? This explanation is unlikely in view of the reappearance of Cushingoid signs as early as 3 weeks after RU486 withdrawal (period E). There was a correlation, however, between the number of GR sites per cell and the administration of RU486. Although RU486 generally resulted in a decrease in GR numbers, the clinical improvement (e.g. diminished and eventual resolution of striae) must be attributed to the antiglucocorticoid action of the drug. Although the HPA axis was disturbed in our patient, we did observe the expected HPA axis up-regulation after GR blockade with RU486; such an up-regulation does not occur in Cushing’s of nonpituitary origin (13, 14, 15, 21). The rise in cortisol might have been insufficient to counteract RU486 blockade in certain tissues, such that clinical improvement occurred (e.g. striae). However, the lack of improvement in BMD may again indicate variable tissue sensitivity, such that it is heightened at the level of the bone.

There was only one other case in the literature describing increased sensitivity to cortisol (22), which also remained a puzzle. It is similar in that the affected patient, a 54-year-old male with short stature (156.8 cm) had variable tissue sensitivity, presenting only with central obesity, moon face, and buffalo hump, yet no striae or reportable osteoporosis. He was also described having noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus since age 50. In addition, he had various abnormalities in either GR numbers (normal or elevated) or affinity (normal or decreased) that varied according to the ligand (cortisol vs. dexamethasone binding assays) and the cell type studied. The authors concluded that such abnormalities were not significant enough to unequivocally account for his condition. The cases are quite dissimilar in that the adult patient had an intact HPA axis and suppressed serum cortisol and urinary free cortisol levels and that his condition did not appear to be transient.

The transient nature of the Cushingoid features, and the fact that GR sequencing demonstrated that the primary GR amino acid sequence is normal, argues against a genetic defect at the receptor level. Indeed, although elevated GR numbers are clearly abnormal, they may not necessarily have caused the Cushingoid features in this patient. The explanation for the elevated GR noted initially remains unknown. In addition, our analysis showed normal promoter usage, thus appearing to rule out a switch to one of the other known promoter regions (which could contain unusual controlling sites).

One way to explain the puzzling characteristics of this case may be to view it as a maturational disorder that parallels the hormonal changes occurring during puberty, much like idiopathic juvenile osteoporosis, also a transient condition occurring between the ages of 8–14 yr (23). However, a postreceptor defect may be more plausible because it is now known that GR act in concert with other transcription factors, such as coactivators and corepressors. Although the 54-yr-old male with increased sensitivity to cortisol and an intact HPA axis discussed above had some abnormalities at the GR level, they were not judged to be primary. Rather, the authors speculated that a postreceptor defect might exist with the transcription machinery (22). Some transcription factors are also common to the GR as well as other steroid hormone receptors (24, 25). Therefore, it is possible that an abnormality in one of the proteins that constitute the transcription factor complex may explain our patient’s condition. For instance, the fluxes in sex steroids during puberty may temporarily alter the availability of transcription factors crucial for glucocorticoid action, and this derangement resolves once pubertal development is complete. A patient with a mild, preexisting imbalance between the various transcription factors may, thus, become transiently symptomatic only during a period of drastic hormonal changes, such as puberty.


    Conclusion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Case History
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
We report a patient with normocortisolemic Cushing’s syndrome who variably manifested high GR sites per cell on peripheral lymphocytes. The mechanism responsible for the Cushingoid phenotype and its transient nature remains unknown.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Diurnal rhythm of cortisol and response to CRF

 

    Acknowledgments
 
We give special thanks to the nursing and medical staff of the Clinical Research Center at the New York-Presbyterian Hospital/New York Weill Cornell Center.


    Footnotes
 
1 Significant sections of the work on which the data are reported herein were supported by USPHS Grant HD-00072 and CCRC Grant RR-06020, and by the collaboration of the Walls Foundation. Back

2 In remembrance of the excellent and most compassionate physician, Dr. George Kalaitzoglou, who passed away in his prime years. Back

Received February 11, 1999.

Revised September 13, 1999.

Accepted September 28, 1999.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Case History
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 

  1. New MI, Gertner J, Chilton D, Thompson E. A new endocrinopathy: Cushingoid features owing to increased number of glucocorticoid receptors rather than increased cortisol secretion. Proc 74th Meeting of The Endocrine Society, San Antonio, TX, June 24–27, 1992.
  2. Abraham GE, Manlimos FS, Solis M, Wickman AC. 1975 Combined radioimmunoassay of four steroids in one ml of plasma. II. Androgens. Clin Biochem. 8:374–378.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Korth-Schotz S, Levine LS, New MI. 1976 Serum androgens in normal prepubertal and pubertal children and in children with precocious adrenarche. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 42:117–124.[Abstract]
  4. Sonino N, Chow D, Levine LS, New MI. 1981 Clinical response to metyrapone as indicated by measurement of mineralocorticoids and glucocorticoids in normal children. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 14:31–39.[Medline]
  5. Loriaux DL. 1995 Tests of adrenocortical function. In: Becker KL, ed. Principles and practice of endocrinology and metabolism. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Company; 662–667.
  6. Chilton DG, Johnson BH, Danel-Moore L, Kawa S, Thompson EB. 1990 Increased glucocorticoid responsiveness of CD4+ T-cell clonal lines grown in serum-free media. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol. 26:561–570.[Medline]
  7. Ashraf J, Thompson EB. 1993 Identification of the activation-labile gene: a single point mutation in the human glucocorticoid receptor presents as two distinct receptor phenotypes. Mol Endocrinol. 7:631–642.[Abstract]
  8. Hollenberg SM, Weinberger C, Ong ES, et al. 1985 Primary structure and expression of a functional human glucocorticoid receptor cDNA. Nature. 318:635–641.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Siebert PD, Larrick JW. 1992 Competitive PCR. Nature. 359:557–558.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Ashraf J, Kunapuli S, Chilton D, Thompson EB. 1991 Cortivazol-mediated induction of glucocorticoid receptor messenger ribonucleic acid in wild-type and dexamethasone-resistant human leukemic (CEM) cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 38:561–568.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Eisen LP, Elsasser MS, Harmon JM. 1988 Positive regulation of the glucocorticoid receptor in human T-cells sensitive to the cytolytic effects of glucocorticoids. J Biol Chem. 263:12044–12048.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Lu PW, Briody JN, Ogle GD, et al. 1994 Bone mineral density of total body, spine, and femoral neck in children and young adults: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study. J Bone Miner Res. 9:1451–1458.[Medline]
  13. Spitz IM, Bardin CW. 1993 Mifepristone (RU486): a modulator of progestin and glucocorticoid action. N Engl J Med. 329:404–412.[Free Full Text]
  14. Chrousos GP, Laue L, Nieman LK, et al. 1988 Glucocorticoids and glucocorticoid antagonists; lessons from RU 486. Kidney Int. 34(Suppl 26):S18–S23.
  15. Laue L, Lotz MT, Chrousos GP, et al. 1990 Effect of chronic treatment with the glucocorticoid antagonist RU 486 in man: toxicity, immunological, and hormonal aspects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 71:1474–1480.[Abstract]
  16. Deraedt RC, Bonnat M, Busigny P, et al. 1985 Pharmakokinetics of RU486. In: Baulieu EE, Segal S, eds. The antiprogestin steroid RU486 and human fertility control. New York: Plenum Press; 103–122.
  17. Magiakou MA, Mastorakos G, Chrousos GP. 1994 Final stature in patients with endogenous Cushing’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 79:1082–1085.[Abstract]
  18. Homo-Delarche F, Duval D. 1986 Glucocorticoid receptors in lymphoid tissue. In: Berczi I, Kovacs K, eds. Hormones and immunity. Lancaster: MTP Press Limited; 1–19.
  19. Bourgeois S, Newby RF. 1977 Diploid and haploid states of the glucocorticoid receptor gene of mouse lymphoid cell lines. Cell. 11:423–30.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Pfahl M, Kelleher RJ Jr, Bourgeois S. General features of steroid resistance of lymphoid cell lines. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 10:192–207.
  21. Nieman LK, Chrousos GP, Kellner C, et al. 1985 Successful treatment of Cushing’s syndrome with the glucocorticoid antagonist RU486. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 61:536–540.[Abstract]
  22. Iida S, Nakamura Y, Fujii H, et al. 1990 A patient with hypocortisolism and Cushing’s syndrome-like manifestations: cortisol hyperreactive syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 70:729–737.[Abstract]
  23. Castells S. Metabolic bone disease. 1996 In: Lifshitz F, ed. Pediatric endocrinology: a clinical guide, 3rd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker; 525.
  24. Wolffe AP. 1997 Chromatin remodeling regulated by steroid and nuclear receptors. Cell Res. 7:127–142.[Medline]
  25. Spencer TE, Jenster GE, Burcin MM, et al. 1997 Steroid receptor coactivator-1 is a histone acetyltransferase. Nature. 389:194–198.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
S. Johanssen and B. Allolio
Mifepristone (RU 486) in Cushing's syndrome
Eur. J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2007; 157(5): 561 - 569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Recent Prog Horm ResHome page
E. F.C. van Rossum and S. W.J. Lamberts
Polymorphisms in the Glucocorticoid Receptor Gene and Their Associations with Metabolic Parameters and Body Composition
Recent Prog. Horm. Res., January 1, 2004; 59(1): 333 - 357.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
O. Heikinheimo, T. Raivio, H. Honkanen, S. Ranta, and O. A. Janne
Termination of Pregnancy with Mifepristone and Prostaglandin Suppresses Transiently Circulating Glucocorticoid Bioactivity
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2003; 88(1): 323 - 326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
T. Raivio, J. J. Palvimo, S. Kannisto, R. Voutilainen, and O. A. Janne
Transactivation Assay for Determination of Glucocorticoid Bioactivity in Human Serum
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2002; 87(8): 3740 - 3744.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. W. Tomlinson, N. Draper, J. Mackie, A. P. Johnson, G. Holder, P. Wood, and P. M. Stewart
Absence of Cushingoid Phenotype in a Patient with Cushing's Disease due to Defective Cortisone to Cortisol Conversion
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2002; 87(1): 57 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
A. Lacroix, N. N'Diaye, J. Tremblay, and P. Hamet
Ectopic and Abnormal Hormone Receptors in Adrenal Cushing's Syndrome
Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2001; 22(1): 75 - 110.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
M. Boscaro, L. Barzon, and N. Sonino
The Diagnosis of Cushing's Syndrome: Atypical Presentations and Laboratory Shortcomings
Arch Intern Med, November 13, 2000; 160(20): 3045 - 3053.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Newfield, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by New, M. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Newfield, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by New, M. I.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals