help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zarkovic, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nesovic, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zarkovic, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nesovic, M.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 84, No. 9 3170-3173
Copyright © 1999 by The Endocrine Society


Original Studies

Optimizing the Diagnostic Criteria for Standard (250-µg) and low Dose (1-µg) Adrenocorticotropin Tests in the Assessment of Adrenal Function

Milo arkovic, Jasmina Ciric, Milo Stojanovic, Zorana Penezic, Boo Trbojevic, Milka Drezgic and Milica Neovic

Institute of Endocrinology, University of Belgrade School of Medicine, 11000 Belgrade, Yugoslavia

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Milo arkovic, Institute of Endocrinology, Dr. Subotica 13, 11000 Belgrade, Yugoslavia. E-mail: mzarkov{at}eunet.yu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ACTH stimulation is the standard test for assessment of adrenal function. It was suggested that the low dose (1 µg) would be more sensitive for detecting mild secondary adrenal insufficiency than the usual dose of 250 µg. The aim of this study was to find the optimal diagnostic criteria and to compare standard dose test (SDT) with the low dose test (LDT). A group of patients treated with corticosteroids for the 6 months was considered to have hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal impairment. Studies were performed in 14 corticosteroid-treated and 28 control subjects in random order on 2 consecutive days. Tests were analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic curve method. The best test was cortisol increment at 15 min of the LDT. It was significantly better than the cortisol concentration at 15 min of the SDT, the best test during the SDT (receiver operating characteristic curve area and 95% confidence interval: LDT, 0.997 and 0.956–0.999; SDT, 0.827 and 0.662–0.929; P = 0.0113). For the cortisol increment at 15 min of the LDT at 100% sensitivity, the diagnostic value was 100 mmol/L, and the specificity was 96%. Therefore, the LDT is superior to the standard dose test in the assessment of secondary adrenal insufficiency.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ACTH STIMULATION is the standard test for assessment of adrenal function (1, 2, 3, 4, 5). It was suggested that the low dose (1 µg) would be more sensitive for detecting mild secondary adrenal insufficiency than the usual dose of 250 µg (6, 7). Although the standard dose ACTH test (SDT) is extensively used, diagnostic criteria are variable (1, 2, 3, 4). The low dose ACTH test (LDT) is not widely used, and there is no consensus on the appropriate test cut-off point (6, 7, 8, 9). Therefore, the aim of this study was to find the optimal diagnostic criteria for these tests and to compare the SDT with the LDT for diagnosis of hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) impairment.

The insulin tolerance test (ITT) has been extensively used in the diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency, but both positive and negative discrepancies have been reported between the ITT and the ACTH test (10, 11, 12). Therefore, the "gold standard" does not exist. Due to the lack of a confirmatory test for adrenal insufficiency we chose a group of patients treated with corticosteroids for 6 months as a group with proven HPA axis suppression.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subjects

Studies were performed in 14 corticosteroid-treated patients and 28 control subjects. Patient data are presented in Table 1Go. Patients were treated for Graves’ ophtalmopathy. During the entire treatment period, patients were euthyroid. The corticosteroid treatment lasted for 6 months and consisted of 6 therapy cycles. Each cycle was started with 500 mg methylprednisolone, iv, daily for 2 days, followed by 40 mg prednisone, orally, daily. The prednisone dose was reduced by 10 mg every 7 days until the daily dose was 10 mg a day. Prednisone 10 mg/day was continued for a week, and then next cycle was started. In the last therapy cycle corticosteroids were tapered in the same fashion as in previous cycles.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Patient data

 
Study protocol

In all subjects the LDT and the SDT were performed in random order on 2 consecutive days. Tests were started at 0800 h with the iv injection of 1 µg or 250 µg ACTH-(1–39) (ICN Yugoslavia, Belgrade, Yugoslavia). Blood samples for cortisol determination were taken from the iv cannula at 0, 15, 30, and 60 min. In the corticosteroid-treated patients the first ACTH test was performed 3–4 days after the last 10-mg prednisone dose.

For the LDT a vial of 250 µg ACTH was diluted in normal saline solution to a concentration of 0.5 µg/mL. The solution was used immediately.

Cortisol measurement

All blood samples was immediately separated and kept frozen at -20 C until assayed. The plasma cortisol concentration was determined using a RIA [Kort RIA-CT, INEP (Zemun, Yugoslavia) and ICN Yugoslavia]. The procedure has an intraassay coefficient of variation of 5.8%, and an interassay coefficient of variation of 6.5%.

Statistical analysis

The patient data and the raw test data are presented as the mean ± SD and compared using t test. Tests were analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve method. The ROC curve area was the measure of the test quality, and the test areas were compared (13). For the ROC analysis, ROCKIT software was used (The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL) (14).

For each test, diagnostic values and specificity for 93% and 100% sensitivities were calculated. Ninety-three percent instead of 95% sensitivity was chosen due to calculation constraints imposed by the number of patients (possible choices were 86% and 93%).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The ACTH dose per kg BW or per m2 body surface area was not different between the groups (Table 1Go).

We evaluated adrenal function using the SDT and LDT according to previously published criteria. Using the SDT for diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency, the highest sensitivity was 50.0% with a specificity of 89.3% (serum cortisol, >580 mmol/L and an increment of >200 mmol/L 60 min after ACTH injection), and the highest specificity was 100% with sensitivity of 28.6% (serum cortisol, >550 mmol/L) (2, 3). The LDT sensitivity was 28.6%, and specificity 96.4% for the diagnostic value of serum cortisol greater than 500 mmol/L. With an increase in the cut-off point to 550 mmol/L, neither sensitivity nor specificity was changed (7, 9, 12).

As a possible test for the assessment of adrenal insufficiency, we evaluated the serum cortisol concentration at each sampling time, the cortisol increment at each sampling time, the maximal cortisol concentration, and the maximal cortisol increment in both the SDT and LDT (Table 2Go and Fig. 1Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Test data

 


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Cortisol concentration during the ACTH test. The upper graph represents the LDT, and the lower graph represents the SDT. Dotted lines represent 95% confidence interval for the mean.

 
In our group of patients, confidence intervals for the area under the ROC curve for the basal cortisol concentration included 0.5, implying that the test is not better than random choice (Fig. 2Go).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. ROC curves for the cortisol increment at 15 min of the LDT (upper curve) and cortisol concentration at 15 min of the SDT (lower curve).

 
During both ACTH tests the stimulated cortisol concentrations were significantly higher in the control group. The maximal cortisol concentration and increment were also higher in the control group. The cortisol increment at each sampling time was larger in the control group during both ACTH tests. The only exception was the cortisol increment at 30 min of the SDT, when no difference was found due to the large SD in the corticosteroid-treated group (Table 2Go, Fig. 1Go).

The best overall test was the cortisol increment at 15 min of the LDT. It was significantly better than the cortisol concentration at 15 min of the SDT, the best test obtained during the SDT (P = 0.0113; Fig. 3Go and Table 2Go). There was no difference in test quality among the cortisol concentration at 15 min, the maximal cortisol concentration, and the maximal cortisol increment during the SDT.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. The cortisol increment at 15 min of the LDT for the each patient. The dotted line is the diagnostic value at 100% sensitivity.

 
For the cortisol increment at 15 min of the LDT, the diagnostic value at 93% sensitivity was 90 mmol/L, and specificity was 100%. At 100% sensitivity, the diagnostic value was 100 mmol/L, and specificity was 96% (Table 2Go, Fig. 3Go).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The optimal test and the optimal testing sequence for adrenal insufficiency are still matters of debate (15, 16). The optimal test should be simple, cheap, with no side-effects, and efficient. The ACTH stimulation test fulfills the first three requirements, but its efficiency is disputed (10, 11, 12). Intuitively, insulin tolerance test could be the gold standard, as it tests the whole HPA axis, but there are some patients who pass the insulin tolerance test but fail the ACTH test (10, 11). Therefore, a gold standard does not exist. Due to these considerations we choose a group of patients treated with corticosteroids for 6 months as the group with proven HPA axis suppression.

As adrenal insufficiency can be a life-threatening condition, the sensitivity of the test for the presence of the disease should be high. We also have to sacrifice specificity for high sensitivity if we choose the ACTH test as the initial test in the battery, because only patients with no risk of adrenal insufficiency will require no further investigations. Therefore, we decided to calculate test diagnostic values for the optimum sensitivity and not for the optimum test efficiency. Because of that, the diagnostic values we have calculated are higher then those usually used, but are comparable to the cortisol response to the SDT recently reported (17). The other reason for the difference in diagnostic values could be our group of patients and controls and the cortisol assay we used. It was shown that there are significant differences in cortisol concentrations determined by different assays (17).

Another reason for the difference in diagnostic values could be the use of ACTH-(1–39) in our study instead of ACTH-(1–24), which was used in previous studies. We do not think that it is a probable cause, as the absolute values of cortisol as well as the kinetics of the cortisol response are comparable to those in previous studies (8, 17). Therefore, the use of ACTH-(1–39) instead of ACTH-(1–24) has a minimal, if any, influence on the obtained results.

We have confirmed the finding of the earlier study that the sensitivity and specificity of the SDT and LDT were the same using the previously published diagnostic values (8). The optimizing test criteria improved both the SDT and LDT in the diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency. The best overall test was cortisol increment at 15 min of the LDT. It was significantly better than the cortisol concentration at 15 min of the SDT (P = 0.0113; Fig. 2Go). The test quality of the cortisol concentration at 15 min of the SDT was not significantly different from the quality of the most used test, the maximal cortisol response and the maximal cortisol increment during the SDT. The specificity of the 15 min cortisol increment during the LDT at 100% sensitivity is 96%, whereas the specificity of the cortisol concentration at 15 min of the SDT at the same sensitivity level is 32%.

According to our data, the adrenal gland in secondary adrenal insufficiency loses the capacity for a prompt response to ACTH stimulation, but the total response capacity is preserved. Therefore, the largest differences in cortisol response occur early after ACTH injection. It may be postulated that the cause of this is the difference in blood flow through the adrenal, because the delivery of ACTH to the adrenal gland is flow dependent (18). As the standard dose, but not the low dose ACTH, increases blood flow through the adrenal glands, the early cortisol response is significantly smaller during the LDT (19). Also, the loss of the early adrenal response to ACTH stimulation could be an inherent property of adrenal insufficiency, analogous to a loss of early insulin response to glucose stimulation in noninsulin-dependent diabetes. Therefore, the loss of early cortisol response to ACTH stimulation could be an important indicator of adrenal insufficiency, because it may represent the first sign of diminishing adrenal function. Although the average response to ACTH was reduced in the corticosteroid-treated group at any time during the test, that does not mean that each individual subject had a reduced response at every time point. Therefore, to maximize the diagnostic yield of the test we assessed the early cortisol response to ACTH stimulation. Accordingly, the highest diagnostic yield was obtained by assessing the results at 15 min of the test.

The aim of our study was to optimize diagnostic usefulness for both LDT and SDT ACTH tests. Compared with the previous criteria, which had high specificity, our optimized criteria have high sensitivity, making the ACTH test an optimal screening test. Moreover, we found that cortisol increment at 15 min of the LDT has both high sensitivity and specificity, making this a good diagnostic test, thus giving an important advantage to the LDT compared to the SDT. In conclusion, the LDT is superior to the SDT in the assessment of secondary adrenal insufficiency, although only long term clinical experience and continuous auditing can truly validate any test.

Received February 12, 1999.

Revised May 4, 1999.

Accepted May 19, 1999.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Trainer PJ, Besser GM. 1995 The Bart’s endocrine protocols, 1st ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 52–52.
  2. Dons RF. 1998 Endocrine and metabolic testing manual, 3rd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1–4-1–5.
  3. Trainer PJ, Rees LH. 1994 The diagnosis of adrenal failure. In: Boloux PM, Rees LH, eds. Diagnostic test in endocrinology and diabetes, 1st ed. London: Chapman & Hall Medical; 252–260.
  4. Tsigos C, Kamilaris TC, Chrousos GP. 1998 Adrenal diseases. In: Moore TW, Eastman RC, eds. Diagnostic endocrinology, 1st ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 125–156.
  5. Oelkers W. 1996 Adrenal insufficiency. N Engl J Med. 335:1206–1212.[Free Full Text]
  6. Thaler LM, Blevins LSJ. 1998 The low dose (1-microg) adrenocorticotropin stimulation test in the evaluation of patients with suspected central adrenal insufficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 83:2726–2729.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Broide J, Soferman R, Kivity S, et al. 1995 Low-dose adrenocorticotropin test reveals impaired adrenal function in patients taking inhaled corticosteroids. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 80:1243–1246.[Abstract]
  8. Mayenknecht J, Diederich S, Bahr V, Plockinger U, Oelkers W. 1998 Comparison of low and high dose corticotropin stimulation tests in patients with pituitary disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 83:1558–1562.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Tordjman K, Jaffe A, Grazas N, Apter C, Stern N. 1995 The role of the low dose (1 microgram) adrenocorticotropin test in the evaluation of patients with pituitary diseases. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 80:1301–1305.[Abstract]
  10. Mukherjee JJ, de Castro JJ, Kaltsas G, et al. 1997 A comparison of the insulin tolerance/glucagon test with the short ACTH stimulation test in the assessment of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis in the early post-operative period after hypophysectomy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 47:51–60.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Hurel SJ, Thompson CJ, Watson MJ, Harris MM, Baylis PH, Kendall-Taylor P. 1996 The short Synacthen and insulin stress tests in the assessment of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 44:141–146.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Rasmuson S, Olsson T, Hagg E. 1996 A low dose ACTH test to assess the function of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 44:151–156.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Kraemer HC. 1992 Evaluating medical tests, 1st ed. Newbury Park: Sage.
  14. Metz CE, Herman BA, Roe CA. 1998 Statistical comparison of two ROC-curve estimates obtained from partially-paired datasets. Med Decis Making. 18:110–121.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Scanlon MF. 1998 The insulin stress test–as good as gold. J Endocrinol. 159[Suppl]:SP26.
  16. Howlett TA. 1998 The synacthen test for diagnosis of ACTH deficiency. J Endocrinol. 159[Suppl]:SP27.
  17. Clark PM, Neylon I, Raggatt PR, Sheppard MC, Stewart PM. 1998 Defining the normal cortisol response to the short synacthen test: implications for the investigation of hypothalamic-pituitary disorders. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 49:287–292.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Jones CT, Edwards AV, Bloom SR. 1990 The effect of changes in adrenal blood flow on adrenal cortical responses to adrenocorticotrophin in conscious calves. J Physiol. 429:377–386.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Edwards AV, Hardy RN, Malinowska KW. 1975 The sensitivity of adrenal responses to synthetic adrenocorticotrophin in the conscious unrestrained calf. J Physiol. 245:639–653.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
M. Zarkovic, S. Ignjatovic, M. Dajak, J. Ciric, B. Beleslin, S. Savic, M. Stojkovic, P. Bulat, and B. Trbojevic
Cortisol response to ACTH stimulation correlates with blood interleukin 6 concentration in healthy humans
Eur. J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2008; 159(5): 649 - 652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
P. W. Speiser and P. C. White
Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia
N. Engl. J. Med., August 21, 2003; 349(8): 776 - 788.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
R. I. Dorin, C. R. Qualls, and L. M. Crapo
Diagnosis of Adrenal Insufficiency
Ann Intern Med, August 5, 2003; 139(3): 194 - 204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
D. R. Williamson, M. Albert, and M. Charneux
Corticosteroids for Patients With Septic Shock
JAMA, January 1, 2003; 289(1): 42 - 42.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
QJMHome page
F.J.L. Kaplan, N.S. Levitt, and S.G. Soule
Primary hypoadrenalism assessed by the 1 {micro}g ACTH test in hospitalized patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis
QJM, September 1, 2000; 93(9): 603 - 609.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
P. C. White and P. W. Speiser
Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia due to 21-Hydroxylase Deficiency
Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2000; 21(3): 245 - 291.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zarkovic, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nesovic, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zarkovic, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nesovic, M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals