help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fraher, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hodsman, A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fraher, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hodsman, A. B.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 84, No. 8 2739-2743
Copyright © 1999 by The Endocrine Society


Original Studies

Comparison of the Biochemical Responses to Human Parathyroid Hormone-(1–31)NH2 and hPTH-(1–34) in Healthy Humans1

L. J. Fraher, R. Avram, P. H. Watson, G. N. Hendy, J. E. Henderson, K. L. Chong, D. Goltzman, P. Morley, G. E. Willick, J. F. Whitfield and A. B. Hodsman

Departments of Medicine (L.J.F., R.A., P.H.W., A.B.H.) and Biochemistry (L.J.F.), The Lawson Research Institute, St. Joseph’s Health Center, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 4V2; the Departments of Medicine and Physiology (G.N.H., J.E.H., K.L.C., D.G.), McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and the Institute for Biological Sciences, National Research Council (P.M., G.E.W., J.F.W.), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Laurence J. Fraher, Room G-442, St. Joseph’s Health Center, 268 Grosvenor Street, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 4V2. E-mail: lfraher{at}lri.stjosephs.london.on.ca


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The 1–31 fragment of human PTH [hPTH-(1–31)NH2] has been shown, like hPTH-(1–34), to have anabolic effects on the skeletons of ovariectomized rats when given intermittently, but, unlike hPTH-(1–34), it does so without affecting serum calcium concentrations and does not activate the protein kinase C second messenger pathway in some target cells. To investigate the biochemical responses to hPTH-(1–31) in humans, we have directly compared it to hPTH-(1–34) during the course of slow infusions of each. Ten healthy adults, five men and five women, aged 26 ± 5 yr (range, 22–37), each received 8-h continuous infusions of 8 pmol/kg·h hPTH-(1–34) and hPTH-(1–31) given in random order at least 2 weeks apart. During the infusions there were significant increases in both plasma and urinary cAMP (P < 0.05), but there were no differences in the responses between the two peptides (P = 0.362 for plasma; P = 0.987 for urine). There were also significant phosphaturic and natriuretic responses to the two peptides, which again were not different between peptides. During the infusion of hPTH-(1–34) serum ionized calcium (Ca2+) increased from 1.21 ± 0.033 to 1.29 ± 0.046 mmol/L (P < 0.01), and endogenous hPTH-(1–84) decreased from 29.6 ± 9 to 15.0 ± 5.7 pg/mL (P < 0.01), such that there was a negative correlation between them (r2 = 0.45). However, when hPTH-(1–31) was infused, neither serum Ca2+ (1.24 ± 0.03 vs. 1.25 ± 0.03) nor hPTH-(1–84) (26.8 ± 5 vs. 30.7 ± 12 pg/mL) was affected. Circulating concentrations of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 increased from 92 ± 42 to 131 ± 63 pmol/L (P < 0.05) during infusion of hPTH-(1–34) and from 92 ± 27 to 110 ± 42 pmol/L (P = NS) during hPTH-(1–31) infusion. There was also a significant increase in the urinary measure of type I collagen degradation of amino-terminal telopeptides from 78 ± 45 to 101 ± 51 nmol/mmol creatinine (P < 0.05) when hPTH-(1–34) was infused, but it was not affected (68 ± 30 vs. 66 ± 24 nmol/mmol creatinine) by hPTH-(1–31). Therefore, hPTH-(1–31) appears to be equivalent and equipotent to hPTH-(1–34) in the release of cAMP from target tissues and the renal handling of phosphate and sodium. However, at the doses employed, it does not increase serum calcium, is a weaker stimulator of the 25-hydroxyvitamin D-1{alpha}-hydroxylase, and does not induce rapid bone resorption.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
AMINO-TERMINAL fragments of PTH are potent anabolic agents for the treatment of osteoporosis because they can strongly stimulate the production of cortical and trabecular bone in ovariectomized rats (1, 2, 3, 4) and humans (5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15). Over the 25 yr of experience of using PTH in treating patients with osteoporosis, the majority of studies have employed the use of synthetic human (h) PTH-(1–34), although some have used the longer hPTH-(1–38) fragment (6, 7, 8). Although all of these studies have demonstrated the beneficial effects of PTH therapy, it is recognized that the limiting factor to its widespread clinical usage is hypercalcemia and mild renal impairment, as noted by Hodsman et al. (16, 17). A new PTH fragment, hPTH-(1–31), has been extensively evaluated in the ovariectomized rat model of osteoporosis and has proven to be as potent as hPTH-(1–34) while having no apparent hypercalcemic effect in these animals (18, 19, 20, 21). In vitro studies using transformed osteoblast cell lines from rats have suggested that although hPTH-(1–34) is capable of stimulating both protein kinase A and protein kinase C pathways, hPTH-(1–31) only activates protein kinase A (22, 23, 24). However, in a more recent study, in which the human PTH/PTHrP receptor was stably transfected into a porcine kidney cell line, hPTH-(1–31) appeared to be equipotent with hPTH-(1–34) in activating both the adenylate cyclase and phospholipase C systems (25). Although we did not attempt to resolve the issue of the precise intracellular pathways by which hPTH-(1–31) activates its target tissues, we were interested to evaluate its effects on a variety of biochemical parameters and compare it to hPTH-(1–34) in vivo in healthy humans. Therefore, in the current study we have examined the biological effects of hPTH-(1–31) when infused at physiological doses over an 8-h period and compared then to those of an equimolar dose of hPTH-(1–34), which has previously been extensively characterized (26, 27).


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subjects

The study protocol was approved by the review board for research involving human subjects at the University of Western Ontario. Ten healthy volunteers were recruited, five men and five women, aged 22–37 yr (mean age, 26 ± 5 yr). After informed consent was obtained, each subject received two test infusions, given in random order spaced at least 2 weeks apart, of hPTH-(1–34) at a dose of 8 pmol/kg·h (equivalent to 0.5 IU/kg·h) or hPTH-(1–31) at a dose of 8 pmol/kg·h. Each infusion was given over 8 h between 1000–1800 h via a peripheral vein, using a Pharmacia IVAC infusion pump (Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ). Venous samples were obtained from the contralateral arm into heparinized tubes 15 min before and 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 h after the start of the infusion. Plasma was separated and frozen at -70 C within 30 min. At 0, 4, and 8 h, blood samples were taken into serum separation tubes, kept on ice, separated, and analyzed for ionized calcium within 1 h. On each test day, six urine collections were made at -2 to 0, 0–1, 1–2, 2–4, 4–6, and 6–8 h and aliquoted before storage at -20 C for analysis as described below.

Methods

Synthetic hPTH-(1–34) was a gift from Rhone Poulenc Rorer Pharmaceutical (Horsham, PA), and synthetic hPTH-(1–31) was synthesized by Sheldon Biotechnology Center, McGill University (Montreal, Canada). The preparation of hPTH-(1–31) was synthesized according to good manufacturing practices and purified to a single peak by high pressure liquid chromatography, and its sequence was confirmed by amino acid analysis. The in vitro potency of each peptide was confirmed and compared by parallel assays of each in two biological assays: 1) an adenylate cyclase assay system in both UMR 106 osteoblasts and OK/E kidney cells (28), and 2) a determination of inhibition of sodium-dependent phosphate transport in OK/E cells (29). The activities of the two peptides were identical in the two assay systems.

Serum calcium (Ca), inorganic phosphate (PO4), creatinine, and alkaline phosphatase together with urinary PO4, potassium (K), sodium (Na), chloride (Cl), and creatinine were measured by standard automated techniques. Urinary calcium was measured by atomic absorption spectroscopy, and serum ionized calcium (Ca2+) was determined by ion-selective electrode (Ciba Corning Diagnostic, Medfield, MA) with a reference range of 1.15–1.30 mmol/L. Serum intact immunoassayable PTH-(1–84) was measured by a two-site immunoradiometric assay (DiaSorin, Inc.) with a reference range of 5–35 pg/mL. Plasma and urinary cAMP were measured by RIA (DiaSorin, Inc.). Plasma 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [1,25-(OH)2D3] was measured as previously described with a reference range of 48–156 pmol/L in young adults (30), and urinary amino-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen (NTx) were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Osteomark, Ostex International, Inc. Seattle, WA) with a normal range of up to 200 nmol/mmol creatinine.

Statistical analysis

In the text the data are expressed as the mean ± SD, and for the figures, error bars are SEMs. Comparisons were made between each treatment at specified time points by a repeated measures ANOVA. Within-treatment peak changes in the measured variables compared to baseline were assessed by paired Student’s t test.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
All 10 subjects completed the full study protocol with no side-effects noted. During the infusions, plasma cAMP increased from 16.1 ± 9.6 to a peak at 2 h of 35.6 ± 24 pmol/L with hPTH-(1–34) and from 19.4 ± 5.8 to 29.7 ± 8.7 pmol/L at 2 h when hPTH-(1–31) was infused (Fig. 1Go, upper panel). Although within each infusion these changes were significant (P < 0.05), there were no differences between the magnitude of change between the infusions (interaction, P = 0.362). Similarly, as shown in the lower panel of Fig. 1Go, when hPTH-(1–34) was infused, urinary cAMP increased from 3.37 ± 1.1 pmol/mmol creatinine (-2 to 0 h) to a peak of 6.92 ± 4.48 pmol/mmol creatinine during the second hour of the infusion (1–2 h; P < 0.05); with hPTH-(1–31), the increase was from 3.84 ± 2.95 to 7.36 ± 5.1 pmol/mmol creatinine (P < 0.05). Again, there were no differences between the effects of either peptide (interaction, P = 0.987). Table 1Go shows the urinary biochemistry for selected variables expressed per mmol creatinine, and in Fig. 2Go the changes in the fractional excretion of phosphate before and at the end of the 8-h infusions. There were no significant differences in the degree of the phosphaturic or natriuretic response between the two infusions, although both the absolute (Table 1Go) and the fractional excretion (Fig. 2Go) of phosphate were slightly greater during the infusion of hPTH-(1–34). Urinary calcium excretion increased steadily during the latter half (4- to 6-h and 6- to 8-h collections) of both infusions, increasing by some 55% at 8 h during the infusion of hPTH-(1–34) and by some 74% with hPTH-(1–31); however, neither reached statistical significance (Table 1Go).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Concentrations of cAMP in plasma (upper panel) and urine, corrected for creatinine content (lower panel), before and at the peak response during infusions of either hPTH-(1–34) (solid circles) or hPTH-(1–31) (open circles) in 10 healthy adults. Values are the mean ± SEM. *, P < 0.05.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Urinary biochemistry

 


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Changes in the fractional excretion of phosphate during the infusion of either hPTH-(1–34) (closed circles) or hPTH-(1–31) (open circles) in 10 healthy adults. **, P < 0.01.

 
During the 8-h infusion of hPTH-(1–34), total serum calcium increased by 0.12 ± 0.07 mmol/L from 2.38 ± 0.5 to 2.50 ± 0.1 mmol/L (P < 0.01), but by only 0.03 ± 0.05 mmol/L from 2.43 ± 0.07 to 2.46 ± 0.08 mmol/L after the infusion of an equimolar dose of hPTH-(1–31). ANOVA showed that there was a significant (P < 0.01) difference between these responses. Shown in Fig. 3Go are sequential observations of the concentrations of serum ionized calcium and endogenous plasma immunoreactive hPTH-(1–84) during the course of the two infusions and at 1000 h on each of the following days. During the infusion of hPTH-(1–34) (Fig. 3Go, upper panel) ionized calcium increased steadily from 1.21 ± 0.033 to 1.29 ± 0.046 mmol/L at 8 h (P < 0.01) and had fallen again to 1.23 ± 0.04 mmol/L by 24 h. At the same time endogenous hPTH-(1–84) fell from 29.6 ± 9.0 to 15.0 ± 5.7 pg/mL by 8 h (P < 0.01), and then returned to 28.1 ± 13.5 pg/mL by 24 h. In contrast, during the infusion of hPTH-(1–31) (Fig. 3Go, lower panel), there were no significant alterations in either ionized calcium or hPTH-(1–84) during the course of the 24 h. ANOVA suggested that there were significant differences in the responses of serum Ca2+ and immunoassayable PTH-(1–84) between the two peptides (P < 0.01). These differences are further illustrated in Fig. 4Go, in which the measured concentrations of ionized calcium are related to those of hPTH-(1–84) in the individual samples from the 10 subjects over the 2 test infusions. During the infusion of hPTH-(1–34) there was a significant negative linear regression between the 2 parameters, whereas no such relationship was found when hPTH-(1–31) was infused.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Changes in the concentrations of serum ionized calcium (open circles) and immunoreactive PTH-(1–84) (closed circles) during (hatched bar) and after infusions of either hPTH-(1–34) (upper panel) or hPTH-(1–31) (lower panel) in 10 healthy adults. Values are the mean ± SEM. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.

 


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Relationship between the measured concentrations of ionized calcium and immunoreactive PTH-(1–84) in samples obtained at 0, 4, 8, and 24 h. Left, During infusion of hPTH-(1–34) (P < 0.001); right, lack of any significant relationship during infusion of hPTH-(1–31).

 
Changes in the concentrations of serum 1,25-(OH)2D3 and urinary NTx from the beginning to the end of the infusions are shown in Fig. 5Go. 1,25-(OH)2D3 increased from 94 ± 42 to 131 ± 63 pmol/L with hPTH-(1–34) (P < 0.05), but from only 92 ± 27 to 110 ± 42 pmol/L with hPTH-(1–31) (P = NS). Similarly, urinary NTx increased from 78 ± 45 to 101 ± 51 nmol/mmol creatinine with hPTH-(1–34) (P < 0.05) and did not change during the infusion of hPTH-(1–31) (67.5 ± 30 vs. 65.6 ± 24 nmol/mmol creatinine).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Concentrations of 1,25-(OH)2D3 in plasma (upper panel) and NTx, corrected for creatinine content (lower panel), before and at the end of infusions of either hPTH-(1–34) (closed circles) or hPTH-(1–31) (open circles) in 10 healthy adults. Values given are the mean ± SEM. *, P < 0.05.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This study shows that although hPTH-(1–31) and hPTH-(1–34) are qualitatively and quantitatively similar in their abilities to generate cAMP and inhibit the renal reabsorption of inorganic phosphorus and sodium when given to healthy humans, hPTH-(1–31), compared to hPTH(1–34), is 1) a weaker stimulator of the 25-hydroxyvitamin D-1-hydroxylase, 2) does not result in the rapid resorption of bone, and 3) does not appear to induce a calcemic response.

Increases in serum calcium are an important issue in view of the potential widespread use of PTH to treat osteoporosis. Infusion of either the holohormone or synthetic hPTH-(1–34) over prolonged periods consistently increases the concentration of serum calcium. In response to total infused doses of between 400–800 U hPTH-(1–34) given over 24 h, serum calcium rises by some 0.3–0.4 mmol/L (11, 13, 31). In contrast, single sc injections of the same amounts of hPTH-(1–34) produce a slow rise in serum calcium of about 0.1 mmol/L, which peaks some 4–8 h postinjection (13, 32). With prolonged daily injections the fasting serum calcium concentration at 24 h after the injection is generally unchanged or only minimally greater than the baseline value, with the total serum calcium remaining within the normal range (17). However, this mode of peptide administration may not be free of sequelae, as Hodsman et al. (16) have noted that patients treated with 800 U hPTH-(1–34) daily for 28 days, repeating every 3 months, experience a significant 10% increase in serum creatinine over 2 yr. These rises in serum calcium are also associated with some degree of suppression of the release of endogenous PTH. Both Finkelstein et al. (8) and Hodsman et al. (16) reported an approximately 50% reduction in the plasma concentration of immunoreactive endogenous PTH 24 h after exogenous PTH injection.

In the present study it was determined that infusion of 8 pmol/kg·h hPTH-(1–34) over 8 h resulted in significant increases in both ionized and total serum calcium, with the former increasing by some 0.08 mmol/L, and the latter by 0.12 mmol/L. Associated with these increases, immunoreactive PTH-(1–84) in plasma decreased by half, from 30 to 15 pg/mL, such that there appeared to be a strong negative correlation between ionized calcium and endogenous PTH under these conditions. In contrast, when hPTH-(1–31) was infused, there were no alterations in either serum calcium or immunoreactive PTH-(1–84). However, the increases in both plasma and urinary cAMP produced during the infusion of hPTH-(1–31) were of equal magnitude to those occurring during the infusion of hPTH-(1–34). The effects of the two peptides on the renal handling of phosphate, calcium, sodium, and potassium were very similar; both induced a significant phosphaturic and natriuretic response. The finding that infusion of hPTH-(1–31) resulted in an increase in the urinary output of calcium, but had no effect on serum calcium, is taken be due to a direct effect of the peptide on the kidney, in that the calciuresis is linked to the loss of sodium, rather than to a response to a rise in serum calcium per se.

Consistent with these effects in humans it should be noted that in animal studies, hPTH-(1–31) has proven to be as effective as hPTH-(1–34) in restoring both trabecular and cortical components of the skeletons of ovariectomized rats (18, 19, 20, 21).

How is hPTH-(1–31) less effective in raising the serum calcium concentration? Two mechanisms are suggested by the present study. First, hPTH-(1–31) is apparently a weaker stimulator of the 25-hydroxyvitamin D-1{alpha}-hydroxylase system, as the increases in circulating 1,25-(OH)2D3 were not as great during the infusion of hPTH-(1–31) as they were during hPTH-(1–34) infusion. Second, hPTH-(1–31), in contrast to hPTH-(1–34), does not stimulate bone resorption, as judged by the unaltered urinary type I collagen N-terminal telopeptide NTx. This analyte reflects type I collagen catabolism and, therefore, by inference is a marker of bone resorption. During the infusion of hPTH-(1–34) the renal output of NTx increased by some 30%, whereas it was unchanged when hPTH-(1–31) was infused. Thus, unlike hPTH-(1–34), the hPTH-(1–31) fragment does not result in significant stimulation of bone resorption when infused continuously and, consequently, does not result in increased release of calcium from the skeleton. Further studies are needed to explore this issue; however, the present studies emphasize that assessment of the clinical potential of hPTH-(1–31) as a bone anabolic agent in the treatment of osteoporosis is warranted.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors thank the Departments of Pharmacy and Clinical Biochemistry for assistance with the studies, and Dr. Larry Stitt, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Western Ontario, for performing the statistical analysis.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by the Medical Research Council of Canada (Grant MT-5775). Back

Received February 24, 1999.

Revised April 5, 1999.

Accepted April 28, 1999.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Tam CS, Heersche JNM, Murray TM, Parsons JA. 1982 Parathyroid hormone stimulates the bone apposition rate independently of its resorptive action: differential effects of intermittent and continuous administration. Endocrinology. 110:505–512.
  2. Kitazawa R, Imai Y, Fukase M, Fujita T. 1991 Effects of continuous infusion of parathyroid hormone and parathyroid hormone-related peptide on rat bone in vivo: comparative study by histomorphometry. Bone Miner. 12:157–166.[Medline]
  3. Hock JM, Gera I. 1992 Effects of continuous and intermittent administration and inhibition of resorption on the anabolic response of bone to parathyroid hormone. J Bone Miner Res. 7:65–72.[Medline]
  4. Watson PH, Lazowski DA, Han VKM, Fraher LJ, Steer BM, Hodsman AB. 1995 Parathyroid hormone restores bone mass and enhances osteoblast insulin-like growth factor-I gene expression in ovariectomized rats. Bone. 16:357–365.[Medline]
  5. Reeve J, Hesp R, Williams D, et al. 1976 Anabolic effect of low doses of a fragment of human parathyroid hormone on the skeleton in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Lancet. 1:1035–1038.[Medline]
  6. Reeve J, Tregear GW, Parsons JA. 1976 Preliminary trial of low doses of human parathyroid hormone l-34 peptide in treatment of osteoporosis. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 21:469–477.
  7. Reeve J, Meunier PJ, Parsons JA, et al. 1980 Anabolic effect of human parathyroid hormone fragment on trabecular bone in involutional osteoporosis: a multi centre trial. Br Med J. 1340–1344.
  8. Finkelstein JS, Klinbanski A, Schaefer EH, Hornstein MD, Schiff I, Neer RM. 1994 Parathyroid hormone for the prevention of bone loss induced by estrogen deficiency. N Engl J Med. 331:1618–1621.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Reeve J, Arlot M, Price TR, et al. 1987 Periodic courses of human 1–34 parathyroid peptide alternating with calcitriol paradoxically reduce bone remodelling in spinal osteoporosis. Eur J Clin Invest. 17:421–428.[Medline]
  10. Hesch RD, Busch U, Prokop M, Delling G, Rittinghaus EF. 1989 Increase of vertebral density by combination therapy with pulsatile 1–38 hPTH and sequential addition of calcitonin nasal spray in osteoporotic patients. Calif Tissue Int. 44:176–180.[Medline]
  11. Hodsman AB, Fraher LJ. 1990 Biochemical responses to sequential human parathyroid hormone (l-38) and calcitonin in osteoporotic patients. Bone Miner. 9:137–152.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Hodsman AB, Steer BM, Fraher LJ, Drost DJ. 1991 Bone densitometric and histomorphometric responses to sequential human parathyroid hormone (l-38) and salmon calcitonin in osteoporotic patients. Bone Miner. 14:67–72.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Hodsman AB, Steer BM, Fraher LJ, Drost DJ. 1991 An evaluation of several biochemical markers for bone formation and resorption in a protocol utilizing cyclical parathyroid hormone and calcitonin therapy for osteoporosis. J Clin Invest. 91:1138–1148.
  14. Lindsay R, Nieves J, Formica C, et al. 1997 Randomised controlled study of effect of parathyroid hormone on vertebral-bone mass and fracture incidence among postmenopausal women on oestrogen with osteoporosis. Lancet. 350:550–555.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Finkelstein JS, Klibanski A, Arnold AL, Toth TL, Hornstein MD, Neer RM. 1998 Prevention of estrogen deficiency-related bone loss with human parathyroid hormone-(1–34): a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 280:1067–1073.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Hodsman AB, Fraher LJ, Watson PH, et al. 1997 A randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of cyclical parathyroid hormone vs. cyclical parathyroid hormone and sequential calcitonin to improve bone mass in post-menopausal women with osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 82:620–628.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Hodsman AB, Fraher LJ, Watson PH. 1998 Parathyroid hormone: the clinical experience and prospects. In: Whitfield JF, Morley P, eds. Anabolic treatments for osteoporosis. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 83–108.
  18. Rixon RH, Whitfield JF, Gagnon L, et al. 1994 Parathyroid hormone fragments may stimulate bone growth in ovariectomized rats by activating adenylyl cyclase. J Bone Miner Res. 9:1179–1189.[Medline]
  19. Whitfield JF, Morley P, Willick GE, Ross V, Barbier J-R, Isaacs R, Ohannessian-Barry L. 1996 Stimulation of the growth of femoral trabecular bone in ovariectomized rats by the novel parathyroid hormone fragment, hPTH-(1–31)NH2 (Ostabolin). Calcif Tissue Int. 58:81–87.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Whitfield JF, Morley P, Willick GE, et al. 1997 Comparison of the abilities of human parathyroid hormone (hPTH)-(1–31)NH2 and human parathyroid hormone-related protein (hPTHrP)-(1–31) NH2 to stimulate femoral trabecular bone growth in ovariectomized rats. Calcif Tissue Int. 60:26–29.[Medline]
  21. Whitfield JF, Morley P, Langilli RM, Willick GE. 1998 Adenylyl cyclase activating agents: parathyroid hormone and prostaglandins. In: Whitfield JF, Morley P, eds. Anabolic treatments for osteoporosis. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 109–169.
  22. Jouishomme H, Whitfield JF, Chakravarthy B, et al. 1992 The protein kinase-C activation domain of the parathyroid hormone. Endocrinology. 130:53–60.[Abstract]
  23. Jouishomme H, Whitfield JF, Gagnon L, et al. 1994 Further definition of the protein kinase-C activating domain of the parathyroid hormone. J Bone Miner Res. 9:943–949.[Medline]
  24. Neugebauer W, Barbier J-R, Sung WL, Whitfield JF, Willick GE. 1995 Solution structure and adenylyl cyclase stimulating activities of C-terminal truncated human parathyroid hormone analogues. Biochemistry. 34:8835–8842.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Takasu H, Bringhurst FR. 1998 Type I parathyroid (PTH)PTH-related peptide (PTHrP) receptors activate phospholipase C in response to carboxyl-truncated analogs of PTH(1–34). Endocrinology. 139:4293–4299.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Fraher L, Hodsman AB, Jonas K, et al. 1992 Comparison of the in vivo biochemical responses to exogenous parathyroid hormone (1–34) and parathyroid hormone-related peptide (1–34) in man. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 75:417–423.[Abstract]
  27. Fraher LJ, Klein K, Marier R, Freeman D, Hendy GN, Goltzman D, Hodsman AB. 1995 Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of parenteral parathyroid hormone (1–34) {PTH-(1–34)} and PTH-related peptide (1–34) in healthy young humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 80:60–64.[Abstract]
  28. Rabbani SA, Mitchell J, Roy DR, Hendy GN, Goltzman D. 1990 Influence of the amino-terminus on in vitro and in vivo biological activity of synthetic parathyroid hormone-like peptides of malignancy. Endocrinology. 123:2709–2716.[Abstract]
  29. Henderson JE, He B, Goltzman D, Karaplis AC. 1996 Constitutive expression of parathyroid hormone-related peptide (PTHrP) stimulates growth and inhibits differentiation of CFK2 chondrocytes. J Cell Physiol. 169:33–41.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Fraher LJ, Adami S, Clemens TL, Jones G, O’Riordan JLH. 1983 Radioimmunoassay of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D2. Studies on the metabolism of vitamin D2 in man. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 18:151–165.
  31. Tsai K-S, Ebeling PR, Riggs BL. 1989 Bone responsiveness to parathyroid hormone in normal and osteoporotic postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 69:1024–0000.[Abstract]
  32. Lindsay R, Nieves J, Hennerman E, Shen V, Cosman F. 1993 Subcutaneous administration of the amino-terminal fragment of human parathyroid hormone-(1–34): kinetics and biochemical responses in estrogenized osteoporotic patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 77:1535–1539.[Abstract]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fraher, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hodsman, A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fraher, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hodsman, A. B.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals