help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bone, H. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bone, H. G.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 84, No. 7 2278-2282
Copyright © 1999 by The Endocrine Society


Special Articles

Who Needs Parathyroid Surgery? The Case for Parathyroidectomy in Nonclassical Primary Hyperparathyroidismb

Henry G. Bone

Michigan Bone and Mineral Clinic at St. John Medical Center Detroit, Michigan 48236 Gary B. Talpos Henry Ford Hospital Detroit, Michigan 48236


    Introduction
 Top
 Introduction
 Classical PHPT
 The Changing Spectrum of...
 Is There Progression of...
 PHPT with Adverse Metabolic...
 PHPT with non-classical symptoms
 Association of Excess Mortality...
 Over-Diagnosis and Misdiagnosis
 Surgical Results and Challenges
 Medical Treatment of PHPT
 Risks vs. Benefits
 Deferral of Surgery
 Summary and Conclusions
 References
 
THE clinical spectrum of primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) includes not only patients with the classical clinical presentation, but also many with nonclassical symptoms, or adverse metabolic effects without overt symptoms, as well as those with minimal clinical manifestations. Apart from the direct effects of PHPT on health, even mildly affected patients may be at increased risk of mortality associated with cardiovascular disease and malignancies. Parathyroidectomy is the only effective treatment for this condition and is generally recommended when clinical sequelae are apparent. Taking into account the subtle adverse effects of PHPT, the excellent surgical results in experienced hands, and the difficulty of maintaining follow-up, the weight of evidence generally favors parathyroidectomy by a skilled surgeon even in nonclassical cases. If surgery is deferred, vigilant follow-up is mandatory.


    Classical PHPT
 Top
 Introduction
 Classical PHPT
 The Changing Spectrum of...
 Is There Progression of...
 PHPT with Adverse Metabolic...
 PHPT with non-classical symptoms
 Association of Excess Mortality...
 Over-Diagnosis and Misdiagnosis
 Surgical Results and Challenges
 Medical Treatment of PHPT
 Risks vs. Benefits
 Deferral of Surgery
 Summary and Conclusions
 References
 
Primary hyperparathyroidism is a classical endocrine disorder resulting from adenomatous or hyperplastic glands, which secrete excess hormone, producing clinical signs and symptoms. For many years, the diagnosis of primary hyperparathyroidism typically resulted from the investigation of a symptomatic patient. Classical PHPT is characterized by frank hypercalcemia and hypercalciuria, often with phosphate depletion, as well as clinical features such as urolithiasis, renal injury, and skeletal effects ranging from osteoporosis to osteitis fibrosa. Gastric hypersecretion with peptic ulcer disease, pancreatitis, and severe constipation are described, as are psychiatric disturbances. Surgical cure generally produces gratifying results, leading to the general recommendation of parathyroidectomy in such cases of "kidney stones, aching bones, abdominal groans, and psychic moans."


    The Changing Spectrum of PHPT: Earlier Detection vs. Milder Disease
 Top
 Introduction
 Classical PHPT
 The Changing Spectrum of...
 Is There Progression of...
 PHPT with Adverse Metabolic...
 PHPT with non-classical symptoms
 Association of Excess Mortality...
 Over-Diagnosis and Misdiagnosis
 Surgical Results and Challenges
 Medical Treatment of PHPT
 Risks vs. Benefits
 Deferral of Surgery
 Summary and Conclusions
 References
 
Our perception of PHPT has been radically altered by the development of automated chemistry panels, including serum Ca measurements and modern serum PTH assays. What amounts to an unintentional national screening program has detected many cases of hypercalcemia. Most are due to primary hyperparathyroidism, confirmed by elevated or nonsuppressed serum PTH levels. The prevalence of PHPT in the general population is now estimated to be 1 or more per thousand (1, 2, 3, 4), and among older women it appears to exceed 1% (3, 4, 5, 6). However, the number of patients presenting with classical symptoms has not increased in proportion to the total. Instead, the spectrum of PHPT has greatly expanded, encompassing patients with classical features who are detected by screening rather than clinical presentation, patients with nonclassical symptoms, or physiological sequelae detectable only by biochemical measurements and bone densitometry, and patients in whom clinical consequences are minimal or not demonstrable. As this phenomenon began, it was unclear how many patients would progress to classical features and how many had intrinsically less aggressive disease. It was also unclear whether nonclassical or "asymptomatic" PHPT would impose additional health risks with less apparent relationship to known PTH effects. Interestingly, a recent study suggests that the apparent incidence of PHPT, having risen sharply, has subsequently declined. This may be the result of "sweeping" the population of prevalent but previously unrecognized cases, but the authors raise the possibility of a decline in the true incidence (7). Looking forward, it may be that efforts to reduce the use of automated chemistry panels will tend to decrease ascertainment of cases in which overt symptoms are not prominent.


    Is There Progression of Nonclassical PHPT? The Challenge of Follow-Up
 Top
 Introduction
 Classical PHPT
 The Changing Spectrum of...
 Is There Progression of...
 PHPT with Adverse Metabolic...
 PHPT with non-classical symptoms
 Association of Excess Mortality...
 Over-Diagnosis and Misdiagnosis
 Surgical Results and Challenges
 Medical Treatment of PHPT
 Risks vs. Benefits
 Deferral of Surgery
 Summary and Conclusions
 References
 
Can we assess the risk of progression of unoperated mild asymptomatic PHPT to more classical disease, or perhaps to a decision point for surgery, without development of overt complications? Although patients had somewhat reduced initial bone mass (8, 9, 10, 11), and up to 20% of subjects in some studies had urolithiasis (8, 11), a number of authors have reported a relatively benign course for most unoperated nonclassical patients over observation periods of several years (9, 10). In view of the expected lifelong exposure of unoperated patients, an extremely long observation period would be required to detect low rates of progression to a more classical clinical profile or gradual effects on organ function. In some reports of adverse outcomes it is difficult to isolate the results for those patients with relatively benign initial presentations (12). Some authors have reported substantial rates of subtle symptoms and/or incident complications (13, 14). Although overt complications occasionally occur (13), renal failure and progressively increasing hypercalcemia are infrequent. Controlled studies describe progressive decreases in bone mineral density, although results of uncontrolled studies have varied (see Bone Metabolism below).

An important prospective study of patients with well-defined mild PHPT conducted at the Mayo Clinic (14) illustrates many of the challenges of nonoperative management of this condition. Of 147 patients entered into the study, 5 actually exceeded the severity criteria at entry, 16 had undergone unsuccessful prior surgery, including 1 who had familial benign hypercalcemia, and in 12 the diagnosis of PHPT was doubtful, as their abnormal findings resolved without intervention. Thirty-two died, and 19 were lost or refused follow-up. Of the 63 previously unoperated subjects with definite PHPT and known outcomes after 10 yr, 33 had undergone surgery, and 3 more had reached criteria for referral. Of the remaining 27 patients, 6 had not completed all the testing specified by the protocol. Another study followed 174 patients who met the authors’ criteria for asymptomatic disease (10). The authors did not find evidence of progressive disease, but stated that only 80 patients had adequate follow-up. Both studies exemplify the difficulties of long-term monitoring, and the Mayo study demonstrated a relatively high rate of eventual surgery in those patients whose follow-up was complete.


    PHPT with Adverse Metabolic Effects in Asymptomatic Patients
 Top
 Introduction
 Classical PHPT
 The Changing Spectrum of...
 Is There Progression of...
 PHPT with Adverse Metabolic...
 PHPT with non-classical symptoms
 Association of Excess Mortality...
 Over-Diagnosis and Misdiagnosis
 Surgical Results and Challenges
 Medical Treatment of PHPT
 Risks vs. Benefits
 Deferral of Surgery
 Summary and Conclusions
 References
 
Bone metabolism. Patients without classical symptoms may well have adverse metabolic effects of PHPT. Among the best characterized of these is loss of bone mass. Osteopenia is well-described in studies of "asymptomatic" PHPT (8, 9, 10, 11). Typically, patients with definite osteoporosis (defined by clinical fractures or very low bone mineral density) are excluded from such studies, but most of the included patients’ bone density measurements nevertheless fall into the lower half of the pertinent reference ranges. In controlled studies, patients with PHPT lost bone mass more rapidly than normal subjects (15, 16), whereas the results of uncontrolled studies have varied (10, 17, 18). Several groups (9, 19, 20, 21, 22) have found that bone mineral density increases substantially after parathyroidectomy, although the entire deficit is generally not repaired. In a small but meticulous investigation of patients who met strict criteria for asymptomatic PHPT, Kaplan et al. (21) found subtle but potentially deleterious abnormalities, correctable by surgery, in all patients studied. On the whole, the available data indicate unfavorable effects of expectant management and beneficial effects of surgery on bone mass.

Renal Effects. Hypercalciuria in PHPT results from the increased renal filtered load and is corrected by successful surgery, reducing the risk of urolithiasis and renal injury. The magnitude of this risk is related to the severity of the hypercalcemia and hypercalciuria, and would be minimized by the application of strict criteria for the deferral of surgery. While classical PHPT is clearly associated with risk of renal failure, impairment of both creatinine clearance and renal concentrating ability have been well described, even in patients with relatively mild PHPT and normal serum creatinine levels (8).

Other Effects. The association of PHPT with hypertension has been well documented but poorly understood (23, 24, 25). Parathyroidectomy does not reliably improve hypertension in these patients. It is not clear whether surgery alters the long-term course of their hypertension. Must we identify them at an even earlier stage? There is evidence of impairment of glucose tolerance by PTH. While there is no well-established link between PHPT and clinical diabetes mellitus (26), there is evidence of an interaction between serum glucose and calcium levels and mortality (27). Effects on cardiac function associated with PHPT have improved after surgery (28, 29, 30, 31), although it may be difficult to preoperatively estimate the role of PHPT in a particular individual. Adverse effects on hematopoiesis have been reversed by surgery (32).

Taken together, the pathophysiologic effects of PHPT generally favor parathyroidectomy in patients with nonclassical disease, although the impact in an individual case may be difficult to predict.


    PHPT with non-classical symptoms
 Top
 Introduction
 Classical PHPT
 The Changing Spectrum of...
 Is There Progression of...
 PHPT with Adverse Metabolic...
 PHPT with non-classical symptoms
 Association of Excess Mortality...
 Over-Diagnosis and Misdiagnosis
 Surgical Results and Challenges
 Medical Treatment of PHPT
 Risks vs. Benefits
 Deferral of Surgery
 Summary and Conclusions
 References
 
There is considerable evidence that many patients with nonclassical PHPT have less specific but nonetheless real symptoms. Such reversible symptoms as lassitude, difficulty with mental concentration, and mild weakness are well described in classical PHPT. Similar though more subtle symptoms were detected with symptom questionnaires in over 90% of patients in a group with predominately mild to moderate hypercalcemia studied before and after surgery (33). Most of these patients demonstrated symptomatic improvement after parathyroidectomy, in contrast to control patients who underwent thyroidectomy for benign nontoxic disease. These results are similar to those seen using the SF 36 Health Status Questionnaire pre- and postoperatively in PHPT patients with mild as well as more severe hypercalcemia (34). Similarly, psychological symptom distress can be detected by formal testing and is reduced by surgery (36, 37). In a small study, post-parathyroidectomy improvement of neuromuscular function was objectively demonstrated in patients with mild preoperative hypercalcemia (35). By their very nature it is quite difficult to predict which less specific symptoms will improve and to what extent. This makes individual risk-benefit assessments difficult, but there does appear to be an advantage for surgery for patients as a group.


    Association of Excess Mortality with PHPT
 Top
 Introduction
 Classical PHPT
 The Changing Spectrum of...
 Is There Progression of...
 PHPT with Adverse Metabolic...
 PHPT with non-classical symptoms
 Association of Excess Mortality...
 Over-Diagnosis and Misdiagnosis
 Surgical Results and Challenges
 Medical Treatment of PHPT
 Risks vs. Benefits
 Deferral of Surgery
 Summary and Conclusions
 References
 
An increased risk of death is described in patients with PHPT, mainly due to cardiovascular disease and cancer. Most studies have suggested that even after parathyroidectomy, there is a residual excess risk of mortality (12, 38, 39). Failure to observe this effect in one large series was attributed by the authors to early surgical intervention (40). Two population-based Swedish studies have demonstrated excess long-term mortality in relatively mildly affected unoperated patients (27, 37, 41). In a large cohort of individuals identified by population screening for hypercalcemia in Gävle, Sweden (27, 37), the risk of death for those under 70 yr of age was about 1.5 times that of matched controls from the same screening group. Nearly half the survivors failed to remain consistently hypercalcemic over the 15-yr follow-up period, suggesting that many of the milder cases may have been over-diagnosed. If so, the relative mortality risk may actually have been underestimated. This study of unoperated patients could not evaluate the effect of surgery on mortality. Another study, following a large group of operated patients (42) with nearly 100% follow-up over an average of 12 yr, found that an excess mortality rate gradually declined after parathyroidectomy, to about that of the general population, indicating that successful surgery eventually ameliorated the excess risk of death in PHPT patients. Strikingly, this study found a statistically significant mortality advantage only for the mildly hypercalcemic patients, suggesting that the greatest benefit might be in those patients for whom surgery is most likely to be deferred. Based on these studies, it appears that the magnitude of the potential reduction of long-term mortality by surgery probably substantially exceeds the extremely low mortality of parathyroidectomy.

Although American observational/natural history studies have generally not reported excess mortality, they have not included concurrent control groups of normal subjects or operated patients. A study of the Rochester, Minnesota population (43) compared outcomes in patients with incidentally discovered hypercalcemia with statistics for white Minnesota residents, adjusted for age and gender. The authors found an increase in mortality only in the top quartile of patients ranked by serum calcium. In this quartile 75% of individuals had serum calcium levels between 11.2 and 11.8 mg/dL, while only 25% were over 11.8 mg/dL. The authors could not demonstrate a clear separation between higher and lower calcium values as predictors of mortality. Many clinicians would regard an uncomplaining patient whose serum calcium level was between 11.2 and 11.8 mg/dL as "asymptomatic" or "mildly affected". How such patients are classified and treated may have important implications for outcome.


    Over-Diagnosis and Misdiagnosis
 Top
 Introduction
 Classical PHPT
 The Changing Spectrum of...
 Is There Progression of...
 PHPT with Adverse Metabolic...
 PHPT with non-classical symptoms
 Association of Excess Mortality...
 Over-Diagnosis and Misdiagnosis
 Surgical Results and Challenges
 Medical Treatment of PHPT
 Risks vs. Benefits
 Deferral of Surgery
 Summary and Conclusions
 References
 
In clinical practice, over-diagnosis and misdiagnosis of PHPT are especially problematic in mildly hypercalcemic patients. Even in the expertly conducted Mayo Clinic prospective study (14), 13 patients’ diagnoses were ultimately regarded as doubtful or incorrect, leading to the authors’ sensible suggestion that very mildly affected patients should be followed for at least a year before surgery. It is increasingly common for patients to be referred for parathyroid surgery without an endocrinologist’s consultation, often on the basis of a marginally abnormal serum Ca concentration with an elevated or nonsuppressed PTH level. If these patients are systematically evaluated, they are sometimes found to have secondary rather than primary hyperparathyroidism, and correction of the underlying condition may result in correction of the calcium and PTH. As described in the Mayo and Gävle studies, some patients’ laboratory abnormalities appear to resolve spontaneously. Thus, in patients without demonstrable symptoms or adverse metabolic effects, it is essential that confounding diagnoses be excluded, and it may be prudent for surgery to be recommended only after an adequate observation period.

Of course, any long-term prospective study of PHPT should be restricted to patients with unambiguous diagnoses, based on persistent hypercalcemia with normal or nonsuppressed PTH levels, despite correction of all discernible contributory conditions.


    Surgical Results and Challenges
 Top
 Introduction
 Classical PHPT
 The Changing Spectrum of...
 Is There Progression of...
 PHPT with Adverse Metabolic...
 PHPT with non-classical symptoms
 Association of Excess Mortality...
 Over-Diagnosis and Misdiagnosis
 Surgical Results and Challenges
 Medical Treatment of PHPT
 Risks vs. Benefits
 Deferral of Surgery
 Summary and Conclusions
 References
 
Because the surgical trauma is minimal, parathyroidectomy is generally well tolerated, even by frail elderly patients, and the operative mortality is extremely low (5, 44, 45, 46, 47). However, the operation is one of considerable delicacy. Injury to the recurrent laryngeal nerve may result in transient or even permanent vocal fold paralysis, but is rare in experienced hands. The variable location of the parathyroid glands, their small size and inconspicuous appearance all contribute to the difficulty that may be experienced locating an adenoma or hyperplastic gland, or especially an ectopic normal gland, and contribute to the occasional problem of missing glands or (rarely) inadvertent surgical hypoparathyroidism. The challenge of locating all abnormal parathyroid glands may be greater in the more subtle cases.

Preoperative localization procedures using isotopic scanning, ultrasound, and CT, as well as selective venous sampling, have been evaluated as aids to the surgeon. Although it is not yet clear that they have actually improved primary surgical results, the use of these techniques is increasing, particularly Tc-sestamibi scans (48). Although results have been impressive in some series, even this technique has yet to consistently demonstrate reliability equal to the best surgeons. Unfortunately, such localizing procedures are most likely to miss exactly those adenomas that are difficult for the surgeon to find. Their value is most apparent before reoperation for persistent or recurrent PHPT, when their use is nearly universal (48), whereas for first operations, the essential localization procedure is still the identification of an expert surgeon (49).

The probability of surgical success and the risk of surgical morbidity depend heavily on the surgeon. There are numerous reports of results from endocrine surgical specialists, but information is more limited from surgeons who perform parathyroidectomies less frequently. Expert surgeons generally have performed 100 or more parathyroidectomies, often performing 25–50 per year. They should have extremely low operative mortality rates in spite of operating on a fair proportion of frail patients. They consistently identify and remove adenomatous or hyperplastic tissue in perhaps 98% of cases and achieve normal postoperative parathyroid function in about 95% or more. Persistent disease may be related to fifth glands, inadequate resection for hyperplasia, or an ectopic adenoma that is not found. Permanent hypoparathyroidism should occur in no more than 1–2% of patients, and serious complications such as permanent vocal-fold paralysis are rare. For less experienced surgeons, the likelihood of persistent disease or complications would be expected to increase in an inverse relationship to training and experience. Generally, parathyroidectomies should be referred to surgeons who perform the procedure with sufficient frequency to maintain a high level of competence.


    Medical Treatment of PHPT
 Top
 Introduction
 Classical PHPT
 The Changing Spectrum of...
 Is There Progression of...
 PHPT with Adverse Metabolic...
 PHPT with non-classical symptoms
 Association of Excess Mortality...
 Over-Diagnosis and Misdiagnosis
 Surgical Results and Challenges
 Medical Treatment of PHPT
 Risks vs. Benefits
 Deferral of Surgery
 Summary and Conclusions
 References
 
We have shown that a medication acting on the calcium receptor can experimentally depress PTH levels in patients with PHPT (50). However, such therapy has no immediate prospect of clinical availability. No other medical treatment controls the underlying condition. Estrogen can reduce the rate of bone resorption, with a favorable effect on bone mass, in postmenopausal women with PHPT (51, 52, 53, 54). However, the available studies have not demonstrated a long-term overall benefit for estrogen as an alternative to parathyroidectomy or expectant management. The long-term use of other potent antiresorptive agents to protect the skeleton in PHPT has not been adequately evaluated.


    Risks vs. Benefits
 Top
 Introduction
 Classical PHPT
 The Changing Spectrum of...
 Is There Progression of...
 PHPT with Adverse Metabolic...
 PHPT with non-classical symptoms
 Association of Excess Mortality...
 Over-Diagnosis and Misdiagnosis
 Surgical Results and Challenges
 Medical Treatment of PHPT
 Risks vs. Benefits
 Deferral of Surgery
 Summary and Conclusions
 References
 
Parathyroidectomy remains the only cure for PHPT. When performed by an expert surgeon, the risks are minimal and the probability of success is excellent. The anticipated benefits may be either improvement of the present condition, prevention of future complications or both. Surgery is favored without controversy when the patient is symptomatic or has clinical adverse effects. For patients who would otherwise develop complications of PHPT, the benefits of earlier detection and surgical cure surely outweigh operative risks and morbidity. When the patient is young or has another condition that may have additive adverse effects, the advantages of surgery have long been apparent. In nonclassical cases, there is now good evidence for progressive bone loss without surgery and for improved bone mass after parathyroidectomy. The evidence indicates that subtle symptoms are very common in nonclassical patients and are improved by surgery, as are the adverse physiological effects, which are also common in such patients. These considerations, together with the evidence for excess long-term mortality risk even in rather mildly affected unoperated patients, produce a persuasive argument that the benefits of surgery in expert hands generally outweigh the risks, even in nonclassical cases. The risk-benefit balance is harder to estimate when access to surgery at a high level of skill is not immediate. Obviously, individual considerations must always be taken into account, but the remoteness of the benefits and the immediacy of the risks may result in deferral of surgery in practice to a greater extent than objective analysis would justify.


    Deferral of Surgery
 Top
 Introduction
 Classical PHPT
 The Changing Spectrum of...
 Is There Progression of...
 PHPT with Adverse Metabolic...
 PHPT with non-classical symptoms
 Association of Excess Mortality...
 Over-Diagnosis and Misdiagnosis
 Surgical Results and Challenges
 Medical Treatment of PHPT
 Risks vs. Benefits
 Deferral of Surgery
 Summary and Conclusions
 References
 
It should be understood that deferral of surgery is not a one-time decision, but rather one that is reviewed and reconsidered regularly in conjunction with meticulous monitoring. It is only acceptable in patients without complications, who are carefully followed to assure that any progression of end-organ effects or development of a complicating condition is promptly detected. The difficulties of nonoperation are illustrated by the high rate of patients lost to follow-up or incompletely evaluated even by conscientious investigators. These difficulties are further compounded by patients’ mobility, both geographical and between insurance plans and health care systems. Depending on the age of the patient, the cost in time and money for nonoperative follow-up may eventually equal or exceed that required for surgery. Furthermore, deferral may result in surgery being performed when a patient is older and in less favorable general health, after suffering a complication of PHPT, or a complicating intercurrent condition. These considerations must be regarded as costs and risks of deferral.


    Summary and Conclusions
 Top
 Introduction
 Classical PHPT
 The Changing Spectrum of...
 Is There Progression of...
 PHPT with Adverse Metabolic...
 PHPT with non-classical symptoms
 Association of Excess Mortality...
 Over-Diagnosis and Misdiagnosis
 Surgical Results and Challenges
 Medical Treatment of PHPT
 Risks vs. Benefits
 Deferral of Surgery
 Summary and Conclusions
 References
 
There is little debate about the primacy of surgery in the management of classical PHPT. Rather, the question has been what to do about the many patients with nonclassical disease. A 1990 NIH consensus conference (55) clearly recommended surgery for patients with significant adverse effects of PHPT, for patients with complicating coexistent illnesses, for younger patients, and for those in whom consistent long-term follow-up could not be assured. It allowed that conscientious surveillance may be justified in patients with minimal hypercalcemia and no adverse effects, but it recognized that for many patients, the time and expense involved in rigorous follow-up would outweigh the burden of surgery. Nine years later, the demonstrated prevalence of nonclassical symptoms and their reversibility, the evidence of "asymptomatic" but harmful effects reversible by surgery, and the accumulating evidence for surgical reduction of increased long-term mortality risk substantially strengthen the argument for surgery in such patients. For these reasons, parathyroidectomy should generally be recommended for patients with a secure diagnosis of PHPT, even in the absence of classical symptoms.


    Footnotes
 
The authors are grateful to Ms. Cathy Borawski and Ms. Jennifer Endicott for assistance in manuscript preparation.


    References
 Top
 Introduction
 Classical PHPT
 The Changing Spectrum of...
 Is There Progression of...
 PHPT with Adverse Metabolic...
 PHPT with non-classical symptoms
 Association of Excess Mortality...
 Over-Diagnosis and Misdiagnosis
 Surgical Results and Challenges
 Medical Treatment of PHPT
 Risks vs. Benefits
 Deferral of Surgery
 Summary and Conclusions
 References
 

  1. Boonstra CE, Jackson CE. 1971 Serum calcium survey for hyperparathyroidism: results in 50,000 clinic patients. Am J Clin Pathol. 55:523–526.[Medline]
  2. Melton 3rd LJ. 1991 Epidemiology of primary hyperparathyroidism. J Bone Miner Res. 6 [Suppl 2]:S25–30; Discussion: S31–32.
  3. Christensson T, Hellström K, Wengle B, Alveryd A, Wikland B. 1976 Prevalence of hypercalcaemia in a health screening in Stockholm. Acta Med Scand. 200:131–137.[Medline]
  4. Palmer M, Jakobsson S, Akerstrom G, Ljunghall S. 1988 Prevalence of hypercalcemia in a health survey: a 14-year follow-up study of serum calcium values. Eur J Clin Invest. 18:39–46.[Medline]
  5. Tibblin S, Palsson N, Rydberg J. 1983 Hyperparathyroidism in the elderly. Ann Surg. 197(2):135–138.
  6. Lundgren E, Rastad J, Thrufjell E, Akerstrom G, Ljunghall S. 1997 Population-based screening for primary hyperparathyroidism with serum calcium and parathyroid hormone values in menopausal women. Surgery. 121(3):287–294.
  7. Wermers RA, Khosla S, Atkinson EJ, Hodgson SF, O’Fallon WM, Melton 3rd LJ. 1997 The rise and fall of primary hyperparathyroidism: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1965–1992. Ann Intern Med. 126:433–440.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Mitlak BH, Daly M, Potts Jr JT, Schoenfeld D, Neer RM. 1991 Asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism. J Bone Miner Res. 6[Suppl 2]:S103–110; discussion S121–124.
  9. Elvius M, Lagrelius A, Nygren A, Alveryd A, Christensson TA, Nordenstrom J. 1995 Seventeen-year follow-up study of bone mass in patients with mild asymptomatic hyperparathyroidism some of whom were operated on. Eur J Surg. 161:863–869.[Medline]
  10. Rao DS, Wilson RJ, Kleerekoper M, Parfitt AM. 1988 Lack of biochemical progression or continuation of accelerated bone loss in mild asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism: evidence for biphasic disease course. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 67:1294–1298.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Bilezikian JP, Silverberg SJ, Shane E, Parisien M, Dempster DW. 1991 Characterization and evaluation of asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism. J Bone Miner Res. 6[Suppl 2]:S85–89; discussion S121–124.
  12. Ronni-Sivula H. 1985 Causes of death in patients previously operated on for primary hyperparathyroidism. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 74:13–18.[Medline]
  13. Corlew DS, Bryda SL, Bradley 3d ED, DeGirolamo M. 1985 Observations on the course of untreated primary hyperparathyroidism. Surgery. 98:1064–1071.[Medline]
  14. Scholz DA, Purnell DC. 1981 Asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism. 10-year prospective study. Mayo Clin Proc. 56:473–478.[Medline]
  15. Grey AB, Stapleton JP, Evans MC, Reid IR. 1996 Accelerated bone loss in post-menopausal women with mild primary hyperparathyroidism. Clin Endocrinol. 44:697–702.[Medline]
  16. Guo CY, Thomas WEG, Al-Dehaimi AW, Assiri AMA, Eastell R. 1996 Longitudinal changes in bone mineral density and bone turnover in postmenopausal women with primary hyperparathyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:3487–3491.[Abstract]
  17. Mole PA, Walkinshaw MH, Gunn A, Paterson CR. 1992 Bone mineral content in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism: a comparison of conservative management with surgical treatment. Br J Surg. 79:263–265.[Medline]
  18. Silverberg SJ, Gartenberg F, Jacobs TP, Shane E, Siris E, Staron RB. 1995 Longitudinal measurements of bone density and biochemical indices in untreated primary hyperparathyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 80:723–728.[Abstract]
  19. Garton M, Martin J, Stewart A, et al. 1995 Changes in bone mass and metabolism after surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism. Clin.
  20. Silverberg SJ, Gartenberg F, Jacobs TP, et al. 1995 Increased bone mineral density after parathyroidectomy in primary hyperparathyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 80:729–734.[Abstract]
  21. Kaplan RA, Snyder WH, Stewart A, Pak CY. 1976 Metabolic effects of parathyroidectomy in asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 42:415–426.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Minisola S, Rosso R, Romagnoli E, et al. 1993 Trabecular bone mineral density in primary hyperparathyroidism: relationship to clinical presentation and biomarkers of skeletal turnover. Bone Miner. 20:113–123.[Medline]
  23. Lind L, Hvarfner A, Palmer M, Grimelius L, Akerstrom G, Ljunghall S. 1991 Hypertension in primary hyperparathyroidism in relation to histopathology. Eur J Surg. 157:457–459.[Medline]
  24. Lind L, Jacobsson S, Palmer M, Lithell H, Wengle B, Ljunghall S. 1991 Cardiovascular risk factors in primary hyperparathyroidism: a 15-year follow-up of operated and unoperated cases. J Intern Med. 230:29–35.[Medline]
  25. Lind L, Lhunghall S. 1995 Pre-operative evaluation of risk factors for complications in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Eur J Clin Invest. 25:955–958.[Medline]
  26. Prager R, Schernthaner G, Niederle B, Roka R. 1990 Evaluation of glucose tolerance, insulin secretion, and insulin action in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism before and after surgery. Calcif Tiss Intern. 46:1–4.
  27. Palmer M, Bergstrom R, Akerstrom G, Adami H, Jakobsson S, Ljunghall S. 1987 Survival and renal function in untreated hypercalcemia. Population-based cohort study with 14 years of follow-up. Lancet. 1:59–62.[Medline]
  28. Stefenelli T, Abela C, Frank H, et al. 1997 Cardiac abnormalities in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism: implications for follow-up. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 82:106–112.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Stefenelli T, Abela C, Frank H, Koller-Strametz J, Niederle B. 1997 Time course of regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after successful parathyroidectomy. Surgery. 121:157–161.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Dalberg K, Brodin LA, Juhlin-Dannfelt A, Farnebo LO. 1996 Cardiac function in primary hyperparathyroidism before and after operation. An echocardiographic study. Eur J Surg. 162:171–176.[Medline]
  31. Georgiannos SN, Jenkins BJ, Goode AW. 1996 Cardiac output in asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism: a stigma of early cardiovascular dysfunction? Intern Surg. 81:171–173.
  32. Kotzmann H, Abela C, Heindl J, et al. 1997 Effect of successful parathyroidectomy on hematopoietic progenitor cells and parameters of red blood cells in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Horm Metab Res. 29:387–392.[Medline]
  33. Chan AK, Duh QY, Katz MH, Siperstein AE, Clark OH. 1995 Clinical manifestations of primary hyperparathyroidism before and after parathyroidectomy. A case-control study. Ann Surg. 222:402–412; discussion 412–414.[Medline]
  34. Burney RE, Jones KR, Christy B, Thompson NW. 1999 Health status improvement after surgical correction of primary hyperparathyroidism in patients with high and low pre-operative calcium levels. Surgery. 125(6):608–614
  35. Chou FF, Sheen-Chen SM, Leong CP. 1995 Neuromuscular recovery after parathyroidectomy in primary hyperparathyroidism. Surgery. 117:18–25.[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Solomon BL, Schaaf M, Smallridge RC. 1994 Psychologic symptoms before and after parathyroid surgery. Am J Med. 96:101–106.[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Ljunghall S, Jakobsson S, Joborn C, Palmer M, Rastad J, Akerstrom G. 1991 Longitudinal studies of mild primary hyperparathyroidism. J Bone Miner Res. 6 [Suppl 2]:S111–116.
  38. Hedback, G, Tisell, LE, Bengtsson BA, Hedman I, Oden A. 1990 Premature death in patients operated on for primary hyperparathyroidism. World J Surg. 14:829–836.[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Palmer M, Adami HO, Bergstrom R, Akerstrom G, Ljunghall S. 1987 Mortality after surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism. A follow-up of 441 patients operated on from 1956 to 1979. Surgery. 102:1.[Medline]
  40. Soreide JA, van Heerden JA, Grant CS, Lo CY, Schleck C, Ilstrup DM. 1997 Survival after surgical treatment for primary hyperparathyroidism. Surgery. 122:1117–1123.[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Leifsson BG, Ahren B. 1996 Serum calcium and survival in a large health screening program. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:2149–2153.[Abstract]
  42. Hedback G, Oden A, Tisell LE. 1991 The influence of surgery on the risk of death in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. World J Surg. 15:399–405; discussion 406–407.[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Wermers RA, Khosla S, Atkinson EJ, et al. 1998 Survival after the diagnosis of hyperparathyroidism: a population-based study. Am J Med. 104:115–122.[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Ohrvall U, Akerstrom G, Ljunghall S, Lundgren E, Juhlin C, Rastad J. 1994 Surgery for sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism in the elderly. World J Surg. 18:612–618.[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Smit PC, van Dalen A, van Vroonhoven TJ. 1998 Strategy in asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism, new arguments for the surgical option. Netherlands J Med. 52:95–99.[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. Ruijs CD, Ottow RT, van Vroonhoven TJ. 1994 Old age is not a contra-indication for surgery in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Netherlands J Med. 45:101–103.[Medline]
  47. Chen H, Parkerson S, Udelsman R. 1998 Parathyroidectomy in the elderly: do the benefits outweigh the risks? World J Surg. 22:531–535; discussion 535–536.[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. Sosa JA. 1998 Cost implications of different surgical management strategies for primary hyperparathyroidism. Surgery. 124:1028–1036.[CrossRef][Medline]
  49. Doppman J. 1997 Efficacy and Utility of Localization Techniques. Presented at 79th Annual Meeting of The Endocrine Society, Minneapolis, MN.
  50. Silverberg SJ, Bone 3rd HG, Marriott TB, et al. 1997 Short-term inhibition of parathyroid hormone secretion by a calcium-receptor agonist in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. N Engl J Med. 337:1506–1510.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Marcus R, Madvig P, Crim M, Pont A, Kosek J. 1984 Conjugated estrogens in the treatment of postmenopausal women with hyperparathyroidism. Ann Intern Med. 100:633–640.
  52. Selby PL, Peacock M. 1986 Ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone in the treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med. 314:1481–1485.[Abstract]
  53. Diamond T, Ng AT, Levy S, Magarey C, Smart R. 1996 Estrogen replacement may be an alternative to parathyroid surgery for the treatment of hyperparathyroidism: a preliminary report. Osteo Int. 6:329–333.
  54. Grey AB, Stapleton JP, Evans MC, Tatnell MA, Reid IR. 1996 Effect of hormone replacement therapy on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with mild primary hyperparathyroidism. A randomized, controlled trial. 125:360–368.
  55. Consensus Development Conference Statement. 1991 J Bone Miner Res. 6S9–13, Supplement 2.




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bone, H. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bone, H. G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals