help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Piatti, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Pontiroli, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Piatti, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Pontiroli, A. E.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 84, No. 5 1658-1663
Copyright © 1999 by The Endocrine Society

Original Studies

Mediation of the Hepatic Effects of Growth Hormone by Its Lipolytic Activity

P. M. Piatti, L. D. Monti, A. Caumo, M. Conti, F. Magni, M. Galli-Kienle, E. Fochesato, A. Pizzini, L. Baldi, G. Valsecchi and A. E. Pontiroli

Istituto Scientifico H. San Raffaele, Unita’ di Malattie Metaboliche, Cattedra di Medicina Interna; Divisione di Medicina, Cattedra di Clinica Medica (L.D.M., G.V.); Laboratorio di Spettrometria di Massa (F.M.); Divisione di Statistica ed Epidemiologia (A.C.); and Dipartimento di Chimica e Biochimica Medica (M.G.-K.), University of Milan, 20132 Milan; and IRCCS H. San Raffaele, Milan, Italy

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Pier Marco Piatti, M.D., Istituto H. Scientifico San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy.


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The aim of the study was to investigate the acute effect of GH per se, independent from its lipolytic activity, on glucose and lipid oxidation and glucose turnover in seven healthy subjects. Five tests lasting 360 min were performed. Each test consisted of a 4-h equilibration period followed by a euglycemic hyperinsulinemic (25 mU/kg·h) clamp lasting 2 h. In test 1 (control experiment) saline was infused, leaving GH and FFA at basal levels. In tests 2, 3, and 4, GH was infused (80 ng/kg·min) to increase GH levels. Whereas in test 2 FFA levels were free to increase due to GH lipolytic activity, in test 3 FFA elevation was prevented by using an antilipolytic compound (Acipimox) that allowed evaluation of the effect of GH at low FFA levels. In test 4 (GH+Acipimox+heparin) GH infusion was associated with the administration of Acipimox and heparin to maintain FFA at the basal level to evaluate the effect of GH per se independent from GH lipolytic activity. In test 5 Acipimox and a variable heparin infusion were given to evaluate possible effects of Acipimox other than the inhibition of lipolysis.

During the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp in the presence of high GH and FFA levels (test 2), glucose oxidation was significantly lower and lipid oxidation was significantly higher than in tests 1, 3, 4, and 5. During the same period, hepatic glucose production was completely suppressed in the control study (test 1; 94%) and in test 5 (99.6%), whereas it was significantly less inhibited (65%, 74%, and 73%) when GH was administered in tests 2, 3, and 4.

In conclusion, these results suggest that GH directly mediates the reduction of insulin’s effect on the liver. In addition, the effect of GH on glucose and lipid oxidation is not direct, but is mediated by its lipolytic activity.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
MANY STUDIES have shown that GH can induce insulin resistance (1, 2, 3), although the mechanism by which an acute increase in its levels can decrease glucose uptake is still debated. In vitro studies have shown that GH decreases glucose uptake without affecting glucose oxidation in human erythrocytes (4, 5), fat tissue (6), or diaphragm cultures (7). In vivo, hepatic glucose seems to reduce forearm glucose uptake, glucose oxidation, and glycogen synthase activity and to impair insulin suppression of hepatic glucose production (8, 9, 10) in favor of increased lipid oxidation. Recently, Neely et al. (11) have shown that after an overnight GH infusion in normal subjects, both GH and free fatty acid (FFA) levels were positively correlated with the increase in peripheral and hepatic insulin resistance. In addition, in most of the previous studies, high levels of GH were invariably associated with high circulating levels of glycerol, FFA, and ß-hydroxybutyrate (8, 9, 10, 12, 13). Therefore, it remains unclear whether the effect of GH on glucose metabolism is direct (10) or mediated by GH-induced lipolytic action through the well known glucose-fatty acid cycle or Randle cycle, as hypothesized by Davidson et al. (14). Indeed, an increase in FFA levels can compete with glucose utilization on the oxidative pathway in muscle and induce insulin resistance (15, 16, 17, 18).

The purpose of this study was to investigate the acute effect of a systemic elevation of GH levels independent from its lipolytic action on glucose and lipid oxidation and hepatic glucose production (HGP) in normal man. Our results indicate that GH directly decreases the insulin suppressibility of HGP. By contrast, GH influences glucose and lipid oxidation only when its ability to stimulate lipolysis is maintained.


   Subjects and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The experimental protocol was approved by the local ethical committee, and informed consent was obtained from each volunteer. Seven healthy male subjects (mean age, 25 ± 3 yr; weight, 72.4 ± 4 kg; fat-free mass, 55.9 ± 2.8 kg) underwent three different tests (lasting 360 min) in random order, with at least a 15-day interval between two consecutive tests. In each test a 4-h equilibration period (0–240 min) was followed by a euglycemic hyperinsulinemic (25 mU/kg·h) clamp lasting 2 h (240–360 min), with blood glucose maintained at basal values by means of a variable glucose (20%) infusion (19).

Test 1 was the control experiment. During this test saline was infused, leaving GH and FFA at their basal levels.

Test 2 was designed to study the effect of increased GH and FFA levels. GH was infused (80 ng/kg·min) to achieve circulating GH levels similar to those seen in major surgery (20, 21) and severe trauma (22). A concomitant elevation of FFA levels was induced by the lipolytic effect of GH.

Test 3 allowed evaluation of the effect of GH in the presence of low FFA levels. GH was infused as in test 1, whereas lipolysis was inhibited using Acipimox (250 mg at 0 and 120 min). Acipimox is a nicotinic acid analog that blocks the spontaneous as well as noradrenaline-, theophyline-, and GH -induced lipolysis from the adipose tissue.

In the same subjects two additional tests (tests 4 and 5) were carried out. Test 4 was performed to evaluate the effect of GH per se independent from the effect of FFA. GH was infused as in test 2, and FFA were kept at the basal levels observed in test 1 despite the administration of Acipimox (250 mg at 0 and 120 min) by giving a variable heparin infusion.

Test 5 was performed to evaluate whether Acipimox could show metabolic effects other than inhibition of lipolysis. Also in this case, FFA were kept at the basal levels as in test 1 despite the administration of Acipimox (250 mg at 0 and 120 min) by giving a variable heparin infusion.

In tests 4 and 5 heparin infusion was modified according to the plasma measurement of FFA levels performed using COBAS FARA every 20 min. To achieve this goal, the following changes were performed in the enzymatic colorimetric method usually used for FFA assay. First, it was automated on a centrifugal analyzer (COBAS FARA II). The total time of the procedure was reduced to 8 min, allowing us to perform measurements of FFA every 20 min during both tests. The present method correlated with a standard manual procedure (r = 0.93; slope = 0.85; intercept = 0.14 mmol/L; P < 0.0001). Intra- and interassay coefficients of variation were 3.01% and 4.24%, respectively.

On the morning of each test, a 20-gauge plastic cannula (Abbocath T, Abbocath, Ireland Ltd., Sling, Ireland) was inserted in a dorsal vein of one hand in a retrograde position, and the hand was maintained at 55 C for intermittent sampling of arterialized blood (glucose, FFA, insulin, GH, and glucagon). A 20-gauge plastic cannula was inserted into a large antecubital vein of the same arm for the administration of different infusions. The total glucose disposal rate was evaluated isotopically by means of a prime (5 mg/kg) continuous (0.05 mg/kg·min) infusion of [6,6-2H2]glucose. During the clamp period, blood glucose was kept constant by means of a variable infusion of 20% dextrose. A fixed amount of dideuterated glucose was also added to the glucose bag (~1.4% cold glucose) to maintain isotopic enrichment constant (23). Both the rate of appearance (Ra) and the rate of disappearance (Rd) of unlabeled glucose were calculated with Steele’s model (24), taking into account the nonnegligible stable isotope mass as indicated previously (25). HGP was derived by subtracting the known constant glucose infusion rate from the Ra.

For 30 min immediately before and during the last 30 min of the euglycemic clamp, the rates of glucose and lipid oxidation were calculated at 1-min intervals using indirect calorimetry. Oxygen uptake and carbon dioxide production were calculated as previously described (26). Protein oxidation was calculated multiplying urinary N excretion by 6.25 (26) and was normalized by urea clearance (27). The urinary nitrogen excretion rate was calculated by collecting urine throughout the test.

Assays

Changes in glucose infusion rates were made according to measurements obtained every 5 min using a glucose analyzer (YSI, Inc., Yellow Springs, OH). All samples were assayed for insulin, GH, and glucagon in a single assay. The methods to measure hormones and isotopic enrichment of [6,6-2H2]glucose have been reported previously (28, 29).

Statistical analysis

All values are expressed as the mean ± SE at each time interval. Multiple comparisons among tests were performed by Scheffe’s F test when appropriate.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Metabolic and hormone levels

Figure 1Go shows the insulin, glucose, GH, and FFA profiles observed during the five studies. For the sake of clarity, we will discuss the preclamp and clamp periods separately.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 1. Blood glucose, serum insulin, serum GH, and plasma FFA profiles (mean ± SE) during the different tests. Test 1 was the control experiment; saline was infused, leaving GH and FFA at their basal levels. Test 2 was designed to study the effects of increased GH and FFA levels; GH was infused alone. Test 3 allowed evaluation of the effect of GH in the presence of low FFA levels; GH was infused as in test 2, and Acipimox was administered orally to inhibit lipolysis. Test 4 was carried out to evaluate the effect of GH per se independent from the effect of FFA; GH was infused as in test 2, and FFA was kept at the basal level by the administration of Acipimox and variable heparin infusion. Test 5 was performed to evaluate whether Acipimox could have metabolic effects other than inhibition of lypolysis; FFA were kept at basal levels by the administration of Acipimox and variable heparin infusion. *, P < 0.05, test 2 vs. tests 1, 3, 4, and 5; §, P < 0.05, test 3 vs. tests 1, 4, and 5.

 
Preclamp period (0–240 min). Glucose and insulin levels were similar at the baseline in the five tests (Fig. 1Go).

GH levels remained at basal levels during the control study (test 1). GH levels increased to a similar extent (range, 55–70 ng/mL) during tests 2, 3, and 4. During the infusion of GH alone (test 2), FFA increased significantly, achieving levels significantly higher than those observed in the other four tests. In contrast, during test 3, FFA levels were suppressed (P < 0.05 vs. tests 1, 2, 4, and 5). During tests 4 and 5, FFA levels were successfully clamped at the basal levels observed in the control study (Fig. 1Go).

Insulin-like growth factor I levels before the start of the study were similar in all tests (test 1, 195.3 ± 17.7; test 2, 185.8 ± 20.9; test 3, 230.3 ± 20.3; test 4, 203.5 ± 21.6; test 5, 210.8 ± 12.8 ng/mL). Glucagon levels remained unchanged in all tests (Table 1Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1. Glucagon levels (picograms per mL) at baseline and at the end of the preclamp and clamp periods

 
Clamp period (240–360 min). Glucose levels were successfully clamped in all tests, with a coefficient of variation of less than 5% (Fig. 1Go). Insulin levels reached a plateau between 210–260 pmol/L (Fig. 1Go). GH levels remained at the plateau values achieved before the clamp period in all tests (Fig. 1Go). FFA decreased in all tests, remaining higher in test 2 with respect to the other four tests. No significant differences were found for FFA among tests 1, 3, 4, and 5. Insulin-like growth factor I levels remained unchanged during the study in all tests (test 1, 202.1 ± 17.9; test 2, 189.9 ± 15.1; test 3, 215.1 ± 22.6; test 4, 193.8 ± 17.3; test 5, 200.7 ± 15.9 ng/mL).

No significant differences were found in glucagon levels at the end of the study in all tests (Table 1Go).

Glucose metabolism and indirect calorimetry results

In Table 2Go are reported the glucose (atom percent excess; APE) enrichment during the last 30 min of the preclamp and clamp periods.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 2. Glucose enrichment (APE) during the last 30 min of the preclamp and clamp periods

 
Table 3Go reports the glucose turnover results, i.e. Rd and HGP. Figure 2Go shows the glucose and lipid oxidation results. Again, for the sake of clarity we will discuss the preclamp and clamp periods separately.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 3. Glucose turnover results during preclamp and clamp periods

 


View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 2. Glucose and lipid oxidation (mean ± SE) during preclamp (upper part) and clamp (lower part) periods. Test 1 was the control experiment; saline was infused, leaving GH and FFA at their basal levels. Test 2 was designed to study the effects of increased GH and FFA levels; GH was infused alone. Test 3 allowed evaluation of the effect of GH in the presence of low FFA levels; GH was infused as in test 2, and Acipimox was administered orally to inhibit lipolysis. Test 4 was carried out to evaluate the effect of GH per se independent from the effect of FFA; GH was infused as in test 2, and FFA were kept at basal levels by the administration of Acipimox and variable heparin infusion. Test 5 was performed to evaluate whether Acipimox could have metabolic effects other than inhibition of lypolysis; FFA were kept at the basal level by the administration of Acipimox and variable heparin infusion. #, P < 0.05, test 2 vs. tests 3 and 4; *, P < 0.05, test 2 vs. tests 1, 3, 4, and 5; §, P < 0.05, test 3 vs. tests 1 and 5.

 
Preclamp period (0–240 min). Rd and HGP were not significantly different among the tests, although Rd and HGP tended to be higher during tests 2, 3, and 4 (i.e. when GH was infused) than during tests 1 and 5. When pooling the data from the five studies, a positive significant correlation between GH levels and HGP was found (r = 0.49; P < 0.01; data not shown). Glucose oxidation was significantly lower during test 2 than during the other four tests (Fig. 2Go). Lipid oxidation was significantly higher during test 2 than during tests 3 and 4 (P < 0.05; Fig. 2Go). In addition, lipid oxidation was significantly lower during test 3 than during tests 1 and 5 (P < 0.05). The protein oxidation rate was similar during all tests (data not shown).

Clamp period (240–360 min). At the end of the clamp period, the glucose infusion rate (M value) was significantly lower during test 2 than during the other four tests (Table 3Go). Rd was not significantly different among the tests, whereas HGP was significantly lower in tests 1 and 5 than in the other tests. If the HGP results are expressed in terms of percent inhibition with respect to values during the preclamp period, HGP inhibition was 94% in test 1 and 99.6% in test 5 compared to 65%, 74%, and 73% in tests 2, 3, and 4, respectively (P < 0.05, tests 1 and 5 vs. tests 2–4; Table 3Go). Once again, GH levels remained significantly correlated with HGP (r = 0.53; P < 0.01; data not shown).

Glucose oxidation increased significantly in all tests, but remained significantly lower during test 2 than during the other tests (Fig. 2Go). Lipid oxidation remained significantly higher during test 2 than during the other tests. Protein oxidation was similar during all tests (data not shown).


   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
The results of the present study demonstrate the existence of a direct effect of GH on HGP independent of a simultaneous increase in FFA levels. This result was obtained with the measurement of total body glucose metabolism using an isotope tracer methodology. The possibility of determining total body glucose disposal (Rd) and the amount of the glucose infusion rate (M value) during the clamp allowed us to correctly measure the HGP during the clamp period. During both preclamp and clamp periods, Rd was not different among tests, although it tended to be decreased during the clamp period in test 2. These data were due to the fact that during the infusion of GH alone (test 2), the M value was significantly decreased and HGP was significantly increased compared to those during the control study (test 1).

In the period before the beginning of the glucose clamp, although HGP during GH infusion (with or without Acipimox) did not significantly increase with respect to the control test with saline infusion, a significant positive correlation between GH and HGP steady state levels was found. Such an action of GH is consistent with the results of previous studies showing hepatic receptors for GH (30, 31, 32) and with the presence of a direct inhibitory effect of GH on insulin binding in the liver (30, 31, 32) but not in muscle (8). Previous studies have been shown that after receptor binding, multiple signaling events occur that are mediated by the GH, including the tyrosine phosphorylation and activation of several cellular proteins (33, 34). In cultured cells, GH determines an activation of JAK2 (Janus kinase-2) and several members of the STAT (signal transducer and activator of transcription) family of proteins, STAT1, -3, and -5 (35, 36, 37). The phosphorylated STAT proteins translocate into the nucleus, bind to DNA, and can activate the transcription of specific genes. The administration of GH in vivo to hypophysectomized rats induced a stimulation of STAT1, -3, and -5 in liver nuclear fraction (38, 39, 40), whereas this effect has been shown in nonhypophysectomized rats for JAK2 and STAT5 (41). Recently, the measurement of tyrosine phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate-1 in liver and muscle of normal rats treated with GH showed a 10% decreased of this expression in liver compared to no effect in muscle (41).

At the end of the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp, in the presence of mild hyperinsulinemia, HGP was completely suppressed only during tests 1 and 5, when GH was not administered. When GH was infused, HGP was significantly less inhibited compared to that in the control study. This effect of GH on HGP was virtually the same when FFA were suppressed by Acipimox or maintained at the basal levels by using Acipimox and heparin. These data suggest that GH is able to acutely mediate the reduction of hepatic sensitivity to insulin independent of FFA levels. They also provide a possible interpretation of previous results in IDDM patients with GH deficiency, in whom an infusion of heparin to increase FFA levels did not increase HGP when performed during the early hours of the morning (42).

Our results indicate that the decreases in the M value and glucose oxidation after GH administration are mediated by GH-increased FFA levels rather than by a direct effect of GH per se. This can be appreciated by comparing the results obtained during the preclamp period of the five tests performed in the present study. In keeping with the findings of Moller et al. (9), glucose oxidation was significantly decreased, and lipid oxidation was significantly enhanced during an acute infusion of GH (test 2). However, when lipolysis and lipid oxidation were completely blocked by Acipimox (test 3) or were maintained at the basal levels by the administration of Acipimox and heparin (test 4), the effect of GH on glucose oxidation were similar to that found during saline infusion (test 1). Of note is that a similar pattern of results was found at the end of the euglycemic clamp. These findings suggest that the effect of GH on glucose and lipid oxidation is not direct, but is mediated by its lipolytic activity. This conclusion is supported by previous in vitro studies showing that 4- to 6-h exposure to GH did not affect either glucose oxidation by adipose tissue from hypoxic rats (43) or glucose conversion to glycogen in soleus muscle in rats (44).

As in the present study Acipimox was used to inhibit lipolysis, it could be argued that the effect on glucose metabolism seen in this study not only was due to an acute decrease in FFA levels but, to some extent, was also related to the drug. Fulcher et al. (45) administered 1000 mg Acipimox (twice the amount used in the present study) and simultaneously clamped FFA levels (at 0.4 mmol/L) by intralipid infusion. They found that glucose oxidation during an euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp was unaffected by the drug, and the increase in glucose disposal was only due to the enhancement of nonoxidative glucose disposal. The results of our study are in agreement with these findings, as glucose oxidation was similar when Acipimox was administered (tests 3–5) and during saline infusion (test 1). Thus, it is most likely that in our study Acipimox did not appreciably influence glucose metabolism. These conclusions are also supported by previous studies in which Acipimox was unable to enhance either the insulin-mediated forearm glucose uptake during euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp in healthy subjects (46) or the suppression of HGP by insulin in noninsulin-dependent diabetic subjects when it was administered in association with heparin to maintain high FFA levels (47).

As chronic therapy with Acipimox seems to increase glucagon levels (48), acute changes in this hormone after administration of the drug could explain some of the differences in HGP among tests. However, in the present study the measurement of glucagon levels at the end of the preclamp and clamp periods did not show any statistical differences among tests. This suggests that Acipimox does not acutely influence glucagon levels in these particular conditions.

In conclusion, our results indicate that GH directly mediates the reduction of insulin’s effect on the liver. In addition, under acute GH administration, GH influences glucose and lipid oxidation only when its ability to stimulate lipolysis is maintained.

Received September 24, 1998.

Revised January 28, 1999.

Accepted February 1, 1999.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Bratusch-Marrain PR, Smith D, De Fronzo RA. 1982 The effect of growth hormone on glucose metabolism and insulin secretion in man. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 55:973–982.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Orskov LO, Schmitz JO, Jorgensen L, et al. 1989 Influence of growth hormone on glucose-induced glucose uptake in normal men as assessed by the hyperglycemic clamp technique. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 68:276–281.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Rizza RA, Mandarino LJ, Gerich JE. 1982 Effects of growth hormone on insulin action in man. Mechanism of insulin resistance, impaired suppression of glucose production, and impaired stimulation of glucose utilization. Diabetes. 31:663–669.[Abstract]
  4. Oski FA, Roth A, Winegrad AI. 1967 In vitro inhibition of erythrocyte glucose consumption by human growth hormone. Nature. 215:81–82.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Takeda S, Podskalny JM, Gorden P. 1984 Direct effect of human growth hormone to inhibit glucose uptake in cultured human fibroblasts. Metabolism. 33:658–661.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Nyberg G, Bostrom S, Johansson R, Smith U. 1980 Reduced glucose incorporation to triglycerides following chronic exposure of human fat cells to growth hormone. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 95:129–133.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Goodman HM. 1967 Effects of growth hormone on glucose utilization in diaphragm muscle in the absence of increased lipolysis. Endocrinology. 81:1099–1103.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Bak JF, Moller N, Schmitz O. 1991 Effects of growth hormone on fuel utilization and muscle glycogen synthase activity in normal humans. Am J Physiol. 260:E736–E742.
  9. Moller N, Jorgensen JOL, Alberti KGMM, Flyvbjerg A, Schimtz O. 1990 Short-term effects of growth hormone on fuel oxidation and regional substrate metabolism in normal man. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 70:1179–1186.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Moller N, Butler PC, Antsiferov MA, Alberti KGMM. 1989 Effects of growth hormone on insulin sensitivity and forearm metabolism in normal man. Diabetologia. 32:105–110.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Neely RDG, Rooney DP, Bell PM, et al. 1992 Influence of growth hormone on glucose-glucose-6-phosphate cycle and insulin action in normal humans. Am J Physiol. 263:E980–E987.
  12. Keller U, Schnell H, Girard J, Stauffacher W. 1984 Effect of physiological elevation of plasma growth hormone levels on ketone body kinetics and lipolysis in normal and acutely insulin-deficient man. Diabetologia. 26:103–108.[Medline]
  13. Metcalfe P, Jhonston DG, Nosadini R, Orksov H, Alberti KGMM. 1981 Metabolic effects of acute and prolonged growth hormone excess in normal and insulin-deficient man. Diabetologia. 20:123–128.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Davidson MB. 1987 Effect of growth on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. Endocr Rev. 8:115–131.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Randle PJ, Newsholme EA, Garland PB. 1964 Regulation of glucose uptake by muscle. Effect of fatty acids, ketone bodies and piruvate, and alloxan-diabetes and starvation, on the uptake and metabolic fate of glucose in rat heart and diaphram muscle. Biochem J. 93:652–687.[Medline]
  16. Ferranninni E, Barret EJ, Bevilaqua S, De Fronzo RA. 1983 Effect of fatty acid on glucose production and utilization in man. J Clin Invest. 72:1737–1747.
  17. Yki-Jarvinen H, Puhakainen I, Koivisto VA. 1991 Effect of free fatty acid on glucose uptake and non oxidative glicolysis across human forearm tissues in the based state and during insulin stimulation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 72:1268–1277.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Piatti PM, Monti LD, Baruffaldi L, et al. 1995 Effects of an acute increase in plasma triglyceride levels on glucose metabolism in man. Metabolism. 44:883–889.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. De Fronzo RA, Tobin JD, Andres R. 1979 Glucose clamp technique: a method for quantifying insulin secretion and resistance. Am J Physiol. 237:E214–E223.
  20. Charters AC, Odell WD, Thompson JC. 1969 Anterior pituitary function during surgical stress and convalescence. Radioimmunoassay of blood TSH, FSH, LH and growth hormone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 29:63–69.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Wright PD, Johnston IDA. 1975 The effect of surgical operation on growth hormone levels in plasma. Surgery. 77:479–486.[Medline]
  22. Carey CL, Cloutier T, Lowery BD. 1971 Growth hormone and adrenocortical response to shock and trauma in the human. Ann Surg. 174:451–458.[Medline]
  23. Finegood DT, Bergman RN, Vranic M. 1987 Estimation of endogenous glucose production during hyperinsulinemic euglycemic glucose clamp. Comparison of unlabeled and labeled exogenous glucose infusates. Diabetes. 36:914–924.[Abstract]
  24. Steele R. 1959 Influence of glucose loading and of injected insulin on hepatic glucose output. Ann NY Acad Sci. 82:420–430.
  25. Cobelli C, Toffolo G, Bier DM, Nosadini R. 1987 Models to interpret kinetic data in stable isotope tracer studies. Am J Physiol. 253:E551–E564.
  26. Ferranninni E. 1988 The theoretical bases of indirect calorimetry: a review. Metabolism. 37:287–301.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Thorburn AW, Gumbiner B, Flynn T, Henry RR. 1991 Substrate oxidation errors during combined indirect calorimetry-hyperinsulinemic glucose clamp studies. Metabolism. 40:391–398.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Piatti PM, Pontiroli AE, Caumo A, et al. 1994 Hyperinsulinemia decreases second-phase but not first-phase arginine-induced insulin release Diabetes. 43:1157–1163.[Abstract]
  29. Magni F, Monti LD, Brambilla P, Poma R, Pozza G, Galli-Kienle M. 1992 Determination of plasma [6,6–2H2] glucose enrichment by a simple and accurate gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric methods. J Chromatogr. 573:127–131.[Medline]
  30. Kahn C, Goldfine I, Neville D, DeMeyts P. 1978 Alterations in insulin binding induced by changes in vivo in the levels of glucocorticoids and growth hormone. Endocrinology. 103:1054–1066.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Hughes J. 1979 Identification and characterization of high and low affinity binging sites for growth hormone in rabbit liver. Endocrinology. 105:414–420.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Carr D, Friesen H. 1976 Growth hormone and insulin binding to human liver. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 42:484–488.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Roupas P, Herington AC. 1994 Postreceptor signaling mechanisms for growth hormone. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 5:154–158.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Argetsinger LS, Campbell GS, Yang X, Witthuhn BA, Silvennoinen O, Ihle JN, Carter-Su C. 1993 Identification of JAK2 as a growth receptor-associated tyrosyne kinase. Cell. 74:237–244.[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Meyer DJ, Campbell GS, Cochran BH, et al. 1994 Growth hormone induces a DNA binding factor related to the interferon-stimulated 91-kDa transcription factor. J Biol Chem. 269:4701–4701.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Campbell GS, Meyer DJ, Raz R, Levy DE, Schwartz J, Carter-Su C. 1995 Activation of acute phase response factor (APRF)/Stat3 transcription factor by growth hormone. J Biol Chem. 270:3974–3979.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Wood TJJ, Silva D, Lobie PE, et al. 1995 Mediation of growth hormone-dependent transcriptional activation by mammary gland factor/stat 5. J Biol Chem. 270:9448–9453.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Gronowski AM, Rotwein P. 1994 Rapid changes in nuclear protein tyrosine phosphorylation after growth hormone treatment in vivo. J Biol Chem. 269:7874–7878.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Gronowski AM, Zhong Z, Wen Z, Thomas MJ, Darnell Jr JE, Rotwein P. 1995 In vivo growth hormone treatment rapidly stimulates the tyrosine phosphorylation and activation of Stat3. Mol Endocrinol. 9:171–177.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Waxman DJ, Ram PA, Park S-H, Choi HK. 1995 Intermittent plasma growth hormone triggers tyrosine phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of a liver-expressed, Stat 5-related DNA binding protein. J Biol Chem. 270:13262–13270.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Chow JC, Ling PR, Qu Z, Laviola L, Ciccarone A, Bistrian BR, Smith R. 1996 Growth hormone stimulates tyrosine phosphorilation of JAK2 and STAT5, but not insulin receptor substrate-1 or SHC proteins in liver and skeletal muscle of normal rats in vivo. Endocrinology. 137:2880–2886.[Abstract]
  42. Boyle PJ, Avogaro A, Smith L, Shah SD, Cryer PE, Santiago JV. 1992 Absence of the dawn phenomenon and abnormal lipolysis in type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes patients with chronic growth hormone deficiency. Diabetologia. 35:372–379.[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Batchelor BR, Stern JS. 1973 The effects of growth hormone upon glucose metabolism and cellularity in rat adipose tissue. Horm Metab Res. 5:37–41.[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Hettiarachchi M, Watkinson A, Jenkins AB, Theos V, Ho KKY, Kraegen EW. 1996 Growth hormone-induced insulin resistance and its relationship to lipid availability in the rat. Diabetes. 45:415–421.[Abstract]
  45. Fulcher GR, Walker M, Farrer M, Johnson AS, Alberti KGMM. 1993 Acipimox increases glucose disposal in normal man independent of changes in plasma nonesterified fatty acid concentration and whole-body lipid oxidation rate. Metabolism. 42:308–314.[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. Piatti PM, Monti LD, Pacchioni M, Pontiroli AE, Pozza G. 1991 Forearm insulin and non-insulin-mediated glucose uptake and muscle metabolism in man: role of free fatty acids and blood glucose. Metabolism. 40:926–933.[CrossRef][Medline]
  47. Saloranta C, Franssila-Kallunki A, Ekstrand A, Taskinen MR, Groop L. 1991 Modulation of hepatic glucose production by non-esterified fatty acids in type 2 [non-insulin-dependent] diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 34:409–411.[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. Paolisso G, Tagliamonte MR, Rizzo MR, et al. 1998 Lowering fatty acids potentiates acute insulin response in first degree relatives of people with type II diabetes. Diabetologia. 41:1127–1132.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. Moller, H. Norrelund, N. Jessen, A. Flyvbjerg, S. B. Pedersen, B. D. Gaylinn, J. Liu, M. O. Thorner, N. Moller, and J. O. Lunde Jorgensen
Impact of Growth Hormone Receptor Blockade on Substrate Metabolism during Fasting in Healthy Subjects
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2009; 94(11): 4524 - 4532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
B. Salgin, M. L. Marcovecchio, R. M. Williams, S. J. Jackson, L. J. Bluck, S. M. Humphreys, C. L. Acerini, and D. B. Dunger
Effects of Growth Hormone and Free Fatty Acids on Insulin Sensitivity in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2009; 94(9): 3297 - 3305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Endocr. Rev.Home page
N. Moller and J. O. L. Jorgensen
Effects of Growth Hormone on Glucose, Lipid, and Protein Metabolism in Human Subjects
Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2009; 30(2): 152 - 177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. Audi, A. Carrascosa, C. Esteban, M. Fernandez-Cancio, P. Andaluz, D. Yeste, R. Espadero, M. L. Granada, H. Wollmann, L. Fryklund, et al.
The exon 3-deleted/full-length Growth Hormone Receptor Polymorphism Does Not Influence the Effect of Puberty or Growth Hormone Therapy on Glucose Homeostasis in Short Non-Growth Hormone-Deficient Small-for-Gestational-Age Children: Results from a Two-Year Controlled Prospective Study
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2008; 93(7): 2709 - 2715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. Ibanez, A. Fucci, C. Valls, K. Ong, D. Dunger, and F. de Zegher
Neutrophil Count in Small-for-Gestational Age Children: Contrasting Effects of Metformin and Growth Hormone Therapy
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2005; 90(6): 3435 - 3439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. M. Buijs, J. A. Romijn, J. Burggraaf, M. L. de Kam, M. Frolich, M. T. Ackermans, H. P. Sauerwein, A. F. Cohen, A. E. Meinders, and H. Pijl
Glucose homeostasis in abdominal obesity: hepatic hyperresponsiveness to growth hormone action
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, July 1, 2004; 287(1): E63 - E68.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
H. Norrelund, C. Djurhuus, J. O. L. Jorgensen, S. Nielsen, K. S. Nair, O. Schmitz, J. S. Christiansen, and N. Moller
Effects of GH on urea, glucose and lipid metabolism, and insulin sensitivity during fasting in GH-deficient patients
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, October 1, 2003; 285(4): E737 - E743.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Nielsen, N. Moller, S. B. Pedersen, J. S. Christiansen, and J. O. L. Jorgensen
The Effect of Long-Term Pharmacological Antilipolysis on Substrate Metabolism in Growth Hormone (GH)-Substituted GH-Deficient Adults
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2002; 87(7): 3274 - 3278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. J. Saad, B. S. Keenan, K. Danadian, V. D. Lewy, and S. A. Arslanian
Dihydrotestosterone Treatment in Adolescents with Delayed Puberty: Does it Explain Insulin Resistance of Puberty?
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2001; 86(10): 4881 - 4886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 DiabetesHome page
S. Nielsen, N. Moller, J. S. Christiansen, and J. O.L. Jorgensen
Pharmacological Antilipolysis Restores Insulin Sensitivity During Growth Hormone Exposure
Diabetes, October 1, 2001; 50(10): 2301 - 2308.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Piatti, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Pontiroli, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Piatti, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Pontiroli, A. E.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals