help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prezelj, J.
Right arrow Articles by Kocijancic, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Prezelj, J.
Right arrow Articles by Kocijancic, A.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 84, No. 12 4747
Copyright © 1999 by The Endocrine Society


Letters to the Editor

Comment on Spironolactone, But Not Flutamide, Administration Prevents Bone Loss in Hyperandrogenic Women Treated with Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist

Janez Prezelj1 and Andreja Kocijancic

Medical Centre Ljubljana, Endocrinology 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

We read with interest the paper by Moghetti et al. (1) where they found that spironolactone, in contrast to flutamide, could prevent bone loss in hyperandrogenic women treated with GnRH. We found it surprising as the results of this study are at variance with our findings, where treatment with spironolactone in combination with linestrenol in hirsute women caused a significant decrease in bone mineral density (2).

As the number of patients and their age were comparable in both studies, there must be other factors influencing the surprisingly different effect on bone mineral density in the two studies. At the moment, only speculations could be made about the causes. Nevertheless, these results stress the need for cautiousness when applying seemingly equal treatment regimens in different conditions.

We fully agree with the author’s statement that additional studies are necessary to assess this bone-protective effect in other conditions and add before it could be recommended as a possible protective agent of bone loss.

References

  1. Moghetti P, Castello R, Zamberlan N, et al. 1999 Spironolactone, but not flutamide, administration prevents bone loss in hyperandrogenic women treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 84:1250–1254.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Prezelj J, Kocijancic A. 1994 Antiandrogen treatment with spironolactone and linestrenol decreases bone mineral density in eumenorrhoeic women with androgen excess. Horm Metab Res. 26:46–48.[Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prezelj, J.
Right arrow Articles by Kocijancic, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Prezelj, J.
Right arrow Articles by Kocijancic, A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals