| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Letters to the Editor |
Medical Centre Ljubljana, Endocrinology 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
We read with interest the paper by Moghetti et al. (1) where they found that spironolactone, in contrast to flutamide, could prevent bone loss in hyperandrogenic women treated with GnRH. We found it surprising as the results of this study are at variance with our findings, where treatment with spironolactone in combination with linestrenol in hirsute women caused a significant decrease in bone mineral density (2).
As the number of patients and their age were comparable in both studies, there must be other factors influencing the surprisingly different effect on bone mineral density in the two studies. At the moment, only speculations could be made about the causes. Nevertheless, these results stress the need for cautiousness when applying seemingly equal treatment regimens in different conditions.
We fully agree with the authors statement that additional studies are necessary to assess this bone-protective effect in other conditions and add before it could be recommended as a possible protective agent of bone loss.
References
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |