help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by New, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by O’Malley, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by New, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by O’Malley, B.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 84, No. 12 4454-4464
Copyright © 1999 by The Endocrine Society


Special Articles

Resistance to Several Steroids in Two Sisters1

M. I. New, S. Nimkarn, D. D. Brandon, S. Cunningham-Rundles, R. C. Wilson, R. S. Newfield, J. Vandermeulen, N. Barron, C. Russo, D. L. Loriaux and B. O’Malley

Department of Pediatrics, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York Weill Cornell Center (M.I.N., S.N., S.C.-R., R.C.W., R.S.N.), New York, New York 10021; the Department of Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University (D.D.B., D.L.L.), Portland, Oregon 97201; the Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University (J.V.), Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; and the Department of Cell Biology, Baylor College of Medicine (N.B., B.O.), Houston, Texas 77030

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Maria I. New, M.D., Department of Pediatrics, Chief, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, 525 East 68th Street, Room M-622, New York, New York 10021. E-mail: minew{at}mail.med.cornell.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
A 14-yr-old native American girl from the Iroquois Nation was referred as a potential patient with the syndrome of apparent mineralocorticoid excess. Instead, her evaluation revealed resistance to glucocorticoids, mineralocorticoids, and androgens, but no resistance to vitamin D or thyroid hormones. She lacked Cushingoid features despite significantly high cortisol levels. Menstruation was regular, and there was no clinical evidence of masculinization despite high serum androgen levels in the male range. The patient’s sister had similar clinical features. Partial resistance to exogenous glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid administration was well demonstrated in both patients. It is proposed that these patients represent the first cases of partial resistance to multiple steroids, possibly due to a coactivator defect.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
STEROID resistance is diagnosed when circulating concentrations of serum steroids are high but there is no clinical effect. Steroid resistance syndromes have been reported for glucocorticoids (1, 2, 3, 4, 5), mineralocorticoids (6, 7), androgens (8), estrogens (9), and progesterone (10, 11). The resistance has usually been attributed to a mutation in the receptor for the specific hormone. The vitamin D and thyroid hormone receptors are in the same nuclear transcription factor family as the steroid receptors, and resistance to both of these hormones has been described (12, 13, 14).

Herein we report a 14-yr-old native American girl from the Iroquois Nation who was referred to this institution as a possible patient with the syndrome of apparent mineralocorticoid excess. Instead, her evaluation revealed resistance to glucocorticoids, mineralocorticoids, and sex steroids, but no resistance to vitamin D or thyroid hormones. She lacked Cushingoid features despite significantly high cortisol levels. Menses were regular, and she did not show signs of masculinization despite high androgen levels in the male range. Partial resistance to exogenous glucocorticoid, mineralocorticoid, and sex steroids was demonstrated. Her 11.5-yr-old sister was equally affected.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Case histories

Patient 1. A 14-yr-old girl was referred to the Children’s Clinical Research Center at the New York Weill Cornell Center for an evaluation of mild hypertension associated with low PRA, hypokalemia, and undetectable serum aldosterone concentrations.

The proband (patient 1) was the result of a normal, full-term vaginal delivery. Her birth weight was 2.5 kg. There were no perinatal complications. Growth and development were entirely normal, and she had no significant medical problems. Menarche occurred at the age of 11 yr, accompanied by normal pubertal development. Her menstrual periods have been regular.

At the age of 9 yr, the first episode of left facial palsy occurred. She was not seen by a physician until 12 yr of age when she had her third episode. Each episode lasted for about 2 weeks and spontaneously resolved. At the third episode, mild hypertension was found. The patient was followed thereafter intermittently until she was referred to the Children’s Clinical Research Center.

Physical examination revealed the patient to be an attractive girl with a normal female body habitus (Fig. 1aGo). Her height was 161 cm (50th percentile for age), and weight was 55.5 kg (75th percentile for age). Pertinent physical findings included a mildly elevated blood pressure of 140–150/83–99 mm Hg (90th percentile for age is 125/81 mm Hg), a mild residual left-sided facial weakness, small Tanner stage V breasts and Tanner stage V pubic hair, a normal vaginal introitus, and no acne, hirsutism, or clitoromegaly. There was no atrophy of the skin, buffalo hump, truncal obesity, plethoric moon face, striae, or bruising. Her Ferriman-Gallway score was 6 (which was within normal limits) (15).



View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. a, Patient 1 at 14 yr of age. b, Patient 2 at 11.5 yr of age.

 
Patient 2. The family evaluation demonstrated that the younger sister (patient 2), at 11.5 yr of age (Fig. 1bGo), was asymptomatic, but was found to have biochemical findings similar to those of her older sister (patient 1; see results below). She was the result of a full-term vaginal delivery, and her past medical history was unremarkable. Menarche occurred at 11 yr of age, and regular menstruation ensued. She was 155 cm tall (90th percentile for age) and weighed 52.3 kg (90th percentile for age). She was normotensive and had no hirsutism, acne, or Cushingoid features. Breasts were small Tanner stage V, and pubic hair was Tanner stage V. Her external genitalia were that of a normal female without clitoromegaly.

Family history (Fig. 2Go). There was no family history of hypertension. The mother was a member of the Cayuga tribe of the Iroquois nation. The paternal grandfather was a member of the Mohawk tribe of the Iroquois nation, and the paternal grandmother was a Caucasian. The Caucasian grandmother died in her thirties after giving birth to her ninth child. The patients’ elder brother is healthy and has a normal biochemical profile.



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. The family pedigree. The arrow depicts the proband (patient 1 or IIIb); IIIc represents the asymptomatic younger sister (patient 2), who is biochemically affected. The elder brother (IIIa) is neither clinically nor biochemically affected. The father (IIa) came from a Mohawk tribe, and the mother (IIb) came from a Cayuga tribe. The paternal grandmother was Caucasian. There is no known consanguinity.

 
Methods

Informed written consent was obtained before the studies for all subjects. In minors, the consent was obtained from the guardian.

Hormone assays. Steroid hormone assays were performed by standard RIA as previously described (16, 17, 18, 19).

Cell culture and cytosol preparation. A lymphoid cell line (P2) was established by Epstein-Barr virus transformation of peripheral blood lymphocytes obtained from patient 2 as previously described (20). Briefly, 2 x 106 peripheral blood mononuclear cells were added to a 12-well plate containing 1 mL filtered (0.45-µm pore size filter) culture supernatant from an Epstein-Barr virus-infected B95–8 marmoset cell line with 30 mL cyclosporin A (0.1 mg/mL; final concentration, 1 ng/mL). Cells were cultured at 37 C for 10 days. Growing colonies were transferred and expanded into T25 flasks. In addition, human Epstein-Barr virus-transformed B lymphocyte cell lines (C1 and C2) established from peripheral blood lymphocytes from normal individuals were used as controls. Cell lines were grown in RPMI 1640 culture medium [RPMI 1640 containing 25 mmol/L HEPES buffer (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 10% FBS (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic solution (Sigma Chemical Co.)] at 37 C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Cells were harvested after 4 days of growth by centrifugation (1500 x g, 10 min) and washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.3, at room temperature to remove growth medium. Cell viability was determined by trypan blue dye exclusion. Cytosol was prepared from cells by sonication in 4 vol ice-cold HEPES buffer (10 mmol/L HEPES, 0.5 mmol/L ethylenediamine tetraacetate, and 0.5 mmol/L dithiothreitol, pH 7.4), followed by centrifugation at 100,000 x g at 4 C for 1 h.

Cytosol mixing studies. Cytosol prepared from Epstein-Barr virus-transformed lymphoid cell lines established from patient 2 or human controls C1 and C2 were used to conduct mixing studies. To determine total binding, cytosol of equivalent protein concentration was mixed in a 1:1 ratio (vol/vol), and 100 µL were incubated with 100 µL [3H]dexamethasone (final concentration, 2 nmol/L) for 18 h at 4 C in duplicate. Nonspecific binding was assessed by the addition of a 200-fold excess of unlabeled dexamethasone in parallel tubes. After incubation, bound steroid was separated from free using dextran-coated charcoal, and bound radioactivity was determined in an aliquot as described above.

Western blot studies. Rabbit polyclonal IgG glucocorticoid receptor antibody P20 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA) was used for Western blot detection of glucocorticoid receptor as previously described (21). This antibody is specific for the {alpha}-isoform of the glucocorticoid receptor and is not cross-reactive with the ß-isoform. It recognizes a conserved epitope in the carboxyl-terminus of the receptor and is mouse, rat, and human reactive.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Laboratory results (Tables 1Go and 2Go)

The baseline laboratory results of patients 1 and 2, including complete blood counts, biochemistry profiles, and urinary analyses, were within normal ranges. Serum potassium in patient 1 ranged from 2.6–3.1 mmol/L (normal, 3.2–5.2 mmol/L), and serum CO2 ranged from 28–32 mmol/L (normal, 22–32). Serum electrolytes were normal in patient 2. In patients 1 and 2 there was elevation of many serum steroid concentrations, including {Delta}4-androstenedione, testosterone, deoxycorticosterone, corticosterone, and cortisol. Estradiol levels fell within the normal range for the follicular phase. The 24-h urinary free cortisol, 17-ketosteroid, and 17-hydroxycorticosteroid levels were markedly elevated in patient 1 and to a lesser extent in patient 2. The serum ACTH concentration was markedly elevated. The serum and urinary aldosterone levels were low to undetectable in patient 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. ACTH stimulation tests of patients 1 and 2

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. ACTH stimulation tests and baseline serum electrolytes of the parents and the elder brother

 
In patient 2, serum aldosterone was low normal, but did not rise with ACTH stimulation. PRA was not suppressed.

The unaffected parents and elder brother had normal serum electrolytes and unsuppressed PRA.

Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA)

ACTH stimulation test. The ACTH stimulation test (standard dose of Cortrosyn, 0.25 mg, iv) revealed a rise in the levels of all serum steroids that were elevated in the baseline state. There was minimal stimulation of all serum steroid concentrations (Table 1Go).

Each parent had a normal baseline and response to ACTH stimulation (Table 2Go). In the elder brother, baseline corticosterone was elevated, but the stimulated level was normal.

Metyrapone and corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) tests. The serum cortisol concentrations in both patients were elevated and did not demonstrate diurnal variation (Table 3Go). In patient 1, an overnight single dose metyrapone test resulted in the elevation of ACTH 6.5-fold, with simultaneous adequate suppression of serum cortisol (Table 4Go). In the CRF test (Table 5Go), serum cortisol and ACTH concentrations were high and rose to higher levels with CRF administration (ACTH rose 4.5-fold).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Circadian rhythm of cortisol in both patients

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Metyrapone challenge test in patient 1

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. CRF challenge test in patient 1

 
Dexamethasone suppression test. The suppression of the HPA axis in response to exogenous glucocorticoids was tested with graded doses of dexamethasone to determine whether the production of adrenal glucocorticoids, androgens, and mineralocorticoids other than aldosterone was ACTH-dependent and normally sensitive to dexamethasone suppression. In patients 1 and 2, the dose of 2 mg/day (0.5 mg, four times daily) for 7 days showed modest suppression of the HPA axis. Only prolonged administration of dexamethasone at a dose of 8 mg showed a significant suppression of ACTH and adrenal steroids, other than aldosterone (Table 6aGo, and Table 6bGo).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6A. Dexamethasone suppression test for patient 1

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6B. Dexamethasone suppression test for patient 2

 
Hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis

LH-releasing hormone test. The LH-releasing hormone test demonstrated normal FSH and LH responses in patient 1, but in patient 2 the responses were blunted. The steroid concentrations of androgens and estrogen were elevated in both sisters (Table 7aGo, and Table 7bGo).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 7A. LHRH stimulation test of patient 1

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 7B. LHRH stimulation test of patient 2

 
The serum concentrations of estradiol and progesterone in patient 1 demonstrated normal variation through the menstrual cycle, as shown in Fig. 3Go.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Normal variations in serum progesterone and estradiol during the menstrual cycle in patient 1.

 
9{alpha}-Fludrocortisone acetate challenge test. With continued dexamethasone administration, 9{alpha}-fludrocortisone acetate was added at high doses (0.6 mg/day) in patient 1. In patient 2, 9{alpha}-fludrocortisone acetate was administered without dexamethasone. No salt retention was demonstrated in either sister (Fig. 4aGo and Fig. 4bGo).



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4A. 9{alpha}-Fludrocortisone acetate administration (0.6 mg/day) in patient 1 (performed after prolonged dexamethasone administration).

 


View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4B. 9{alpha}-Fludrocortisone acetate administration (0.6 mg/day) in patient 2.

 
Radiological examinations

A computed tomography scan of patient 1 showed massively enlarged adrenal glands with diffused and increased nodularity. The uterus was structurally normal, as imaged by a magnetic resonance scan. The magnetic resonance scan of the head was normal. Bone mineral density was normal for age-matched controls, and the patient’s pelvic sonogram demonstrated normal ovaries. The bone age was advanced to 17 yr at the chronological age of 14 yr.

The bone age of patient 2 was 15 yr at a chronological age of 11.5 yr. She had normal adrenal glands, as observed by computed tomography scan. A pelvic sonogram also produced normal results. Her bone mineral density was normal for age-appropriate standards.

Western blot detection of molecular chaperones

Studies have indicated that steroid receptors remain inactive in a complex with heat shock protein-90 (hsp90) and other stress family proteins before binding with hormones. Hormone binding induces critical conformational changes in the steroid receptor that cause them to dissociate from the inhibitory complex, thus modulating gene transcription (39). Western blotting for chaperonin proteins indicated no alteration in the size or expression levels of hsp70, hsp90 {alpha} and ß isoforms, hsp70, protein phosphatase 5, FKBP52, or cyclophilin 40 in the P2 cell line compared to those in the C2 control cell line (data not shown). However, Western analysis does not detect alterations in the primary structure of a given protein. Therefore, involvement of chaperonin proteins cannot be completely rule out.

Cytosol mixing studies

Mixing studies using cytosol prepared from a New World primate cell line mixed with cytosol derived from human tissues showed inhibited binding of dexamethasone to the glucocorticoid receptor (22). This inhibitory activity may be involved in the steroid resistance of New World primates. When cytosol of equivalent protein concentration was prepared from the control cell line (C1) and mixed 1:1 with cytosol prepared from the patient cell line (P2), no evidence for inhibition of [3H]dexamethasone binding was found (Fig. 5Go). However, the concentration of an inhibitor may be too low for the detection limits of this assay.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Effect of cytosol from P2 cells (EBV-transformed lymphoid cells derived from patient 2) on binding of [3H]dexamethasone to glucocorticoid receptor in control cytosol. Cytosols were mixed in a 1:1 (vol/vol) ratio, and specific binding was assessed using 2 nmol/L [3H]dexamethasone. For comparison, cytosol prepared from EBV-transformed cells from patient 2 (P2) or two normal individuals (C1 and C2) were used to determine [3H]dexamethasone binding before mixing. The amount of specific binding in cytosol mixtures was similar to that expected from simple mixing. This indicates that there is no transferable factor present in the cytosol from patient 2 that leads to diminished glucocorticoid receptor-ligand interaction, which is analogous to that described in glucocorticoid-resistant New World primates (22 ).

 
Coactivator studies

To test for a coactivator deficiency, deletion analysis of several coactivators [SRC-1, SRC-2 (TIF-2/GRIP-1), SRC-3 (pCIP), E6AP, SRA (unpublished), TRIP-230, P/CAF, and TIF-1, whose function is not yet known] was performed. Southern analysis of genomic DNA was carried out, along with multiple restriction enzyme digests of genomic fragments (23). No deletions or major rearrangements were found. However, deletion analysis only detects large gene rearrangements; therefore, other defects in these coactivators cannot be ruled out.

Miscellaneous tests

The thyroid evaluation, PTH, calcium, phosphate, alkaline phosphatase, and vitamin D metabolites were normal for both patients (Table 8Go). Sex hormone-binding globulin levels in both patients 1 and 2 were within the normal range. A vaginal smear showed low estrogen effects for both sisters despite normal levels of estradiol.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 8. Thyroid evaluation, vitamin D metabolites, and PTH in patients 1 and 2

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In vivo examination of serum hormone levels revealed resistance to three classes of steroids in two sisters.

Glucocorticoids

Despite high cortisol serum concentrations and the absence of diurnal rhythm, there were no Cushingoid features. The degree of ACTH compensation in these two patients is strikingly different compared to that of their serum cortisol and urinary cortisol metabolites. The cause of this discrepancy is unknown. Further, prolonged administration of large doses of dexamethasone did not produce Cushingoid signs.

Androgens

The serum androgen concentrations were high and in the male range, yet the sisters were not masculinized. They did not manifest acne, hirsutism, or clitoromegaly. However, their bone ages were advanced, indicating only partial resistance.

Estrogens

Estrogen levels were normal, but the vaginal epithelium showed poor estrogenization. Puberty (including breast and pubic hair development), although early, was normal, and menses were regular. The sex hormone-binding globulin level was not low. The regular menses, normal secondary sex characteristics, and normal bone mineral density indicate that the resistance to estrogens and androgens is partial.

Mineralocorticoids

Although the serum concentrations of aldosterone were low to undetectable in patient 1, salt retention did not occur even with administration of 9{alpha}-fludrocortisone acetate at 6 times the usual dose. The low levels of aldosterone and suppressed renin may result from the high levels of cortisol, which can activate the mineralocorticoid receptor. This, in turn, would cause sodium retention and plasma volume expansion and suppress PRA, which would result in decreased aldosterone secretion. Nevertheless, the failure to retain sodium with very high doses of 9{alpha}-fludrocortisone acetate administration demonstrated partial resistance to mineralocorticoids.

Because there was no clinical indication of progesterone resistance, there was no histological study of uterine mucosa performed. Nevertheless, the patients could have partial resistance as reported in the case study, in which the patient had a normal menstrual cycle and normal progesterone levels, but abnormal maturation demonstrated by histology (10).

Suppression tests

Suppression of ACTH, which should cause a decrease in steroid concentrations in the serum, occurred at only very high doses of dexamethasone administration. This indicates that the HPA axis is partially resistant to glucocorticoid action.

Theories postulated for the multiple hormone resistance

The mechanism for such resistance to multiple steroid hormones in these patients could be caused by defects at various points in the cascade of the hormone-receptor-DNA interaction. Cellular sensitivity to a steroid hormone is influenced by a number of factors, including the level of receptors, their affinity for ligands, their rate of translocation to the nucleus after activation, and their ability to trans-activate a response. Disruption at each of these levels can lead to decreased sensitivity to one or more steroid hormones, most often leading to a compensatory increase in plasma hormone levels.

1) Resistance to steroid hormones found in New World primates may represent cumulative adaptive changes over a period of some 60 million yr (24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32). It is also possible that a single mutation in one of these signaling pathways leads to diminished responses to other steroid hormones. In fact, New World primates have adapted to partial resistance to high circulating levels of many steroid hormones (24). Unlike these patients, the squirrel monkey (New World primate) has increased aldosterone concentrations, which may be due to an adaptive mechanism in their mineralocorticoid target tissue (30). In addition, small New World primates have elevated estrogen levels, but large New World primates do not have elevated estrogen levels as found in our patients (28, 33). However, it remains unclear whether a primary alteration in a steroid receptor gene underlies resistance in these species. For example, these primates are profoundly resistant to glucocorticoid, but the glucocorticoid receptor has been cloned from several species of New World primates, and in each case the receptor exhibits normal binding affinity for ligand when measured outside its native cellular milieu despite markedly diminished affinity for ligand when measured in its native cell (22, 34, 35, 36). In addition, the New World primate glucocorticoid receptor can activate ligand-dependent gene transcription from a glucocorticoid response element (36) in a heterologous system similar to the human glucocorticoid receptor. The New World primate cell apparently expresses a soluble protein activity that somehow interferes with binding of ligand to the glucocorticoid receptor, but this activity has no effect on binding of progestin or estrogen to their cognate receptors (22, 36). It remains possible that one or more of the chaperonin proteins involved in steroid-receptor heterocomplex formation may be altered in the New World primate, thereby simultaneously affecting multiple steroid receptor pathways. Historically, the observation of generalized hormone resistance in the New World primates led to speculation that steroid receptors were somehow related, an observation that preceded the cloning of steroid receptors and the attendant realization that these proteins are highly related in structure and function (27). The New World primates offer an important opportunity to examine aspects of the mechanism of the action of steroid hormones.

2) Adams et al. concluded that vitamin D-resistant and gonadal steroid-resistant New World Primate cells contain proteins that may silence receptor action by interacting directly with responsive elements and interfering with receptor binding (37, 38).

3) Another proposal has arisen with the recent explosion of knowledge regarding proteins involved in the regulation of transcription, that is, coactivators and corepressors. Steroid receptors belong to a superfamily of ligand-inducible transcription factors that regulate hormone-responsive genes. Steroid receptors remain inactive in a complex with hsp-90 and other stress family proteins before binding with hormones. Hormone binding induces critical conformational changes in the steroid receptor that cause them to dissociate from the inhibitory complex, bind as homodimers to specific DNA enhancer elements associated with target genes, and therefore modulate the transcription of the target gene (39). After binding to enhancer elements, transcription factors require transcriptional coactivator proteins to mediate their stimulation of transcription initiation.

The first functional coactivator cloned and identified was SRC-1 (steroid receptor coactivator-1) (40). It was shown to interact with and stimulate nuclear receptor action in a ligand-dependent manner with both type 1 receptors (estrogen, progesterone, glucocorticoid, androgen, and mineralocorticoid) as well as type II receptors (for T3, vitamin D3, retinoic acid, fatty acids, orphans, etc.). This molecule was confirmed to have an in vivo function using SRC-1 knockout mice, in which partial hormone resistance was demonstrated (41). SRC-1 belongs to a family of three coactivators that includes TIF-2 (GRIP-I) and pCIP (ACTR, RAC-3) (40, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49). Subsequently, a number of other coactivators and corepressors have been cloned, but there is no reason to believe that all coregulators have been identified to date.

Results to date from a number of laboratories indicate that coactivators are required for full transcriptional activity of the steroid receptor superfamily. Partial resistance to estrogens, androgens, and progesterone were concomitant in the SRC-1 knockout mouse model. Further increased expression of TIF2 in the face of an inability to produce SRC-1 in these knockout mice indicates a certain degree of redundancy and overlap between different coactivators (41). The phenotypic features of the mouse with knockout of SRC-1 were similar to those of our patients.

Human examples of coactivator defects

Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome (RTS) is the first human disease to be shown to be due to a coactivator defect. Many patients with RTS have been shown to have microdeletion of chromosome 16p13.3. All of these breakpoints are restricted to a region containing the gene for human cAMP response element-binding protein (or cyclic AMP-responsive DNA-binding protein), a nuclear protein participating as a coactivator in cAMP-regulated gene expression. The role of cAMP response element-binding protein as transcriptional coactivator is suggested by a single mutated gene capable of producing a broad range of the symptoms seen in RTS (50).

It is shown that two retinoic acid receptor fusion proteins recruit the nuclear corepressor histone deacetylase complex through the receptor nuclear corepressor box. Recruitment of histone deacetylase is crucial to the transforming potential of acute promyelocytic leukemia fusion proteins, and the different effects of retinoic acid on the stability of the corepressor complexes determine the differential response of acute promyelocytic leukemias to retinoic acid (51, 52, 53).

Summary and conclusion

Genetic mutations in a specific steroid receptor gene have been demonstrated to cause hormonal resistance to the specific receptor ligand. As each individual steroid hormone receptor is encoded by a different gene on separate chromosomes (54), it is unlikely that the simultaneous genetic mutations of each of theses steroid receptors is the cause of the multiple hormone resistance. Involvement of more than one steroid receptor suggests a shared defect involving multiple steroid receptors. The findings from studies of our two patients are consistent with a unique clinical entity of multiple hormone resistance, similar to the New World Primate syndrome. We propose a coactivator defect to be the most likely mechanism underlying this partial multiple hormone resistance. Further studies are necessary to define the role of transcription factors in human disease.


    Acknowledgments
 
We express our appreciation to Laurie Vandermolen for her help in editing and preparing this manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by USPHS Grant HD-00072 and General Clinical Research Center Grant RR-06020 (to M.I.N., S.N., S.C.-R., R.C.W., and R.S.N.), NIH Grant 1P01-HD-30236 (to D.B.B. and D.L.L.), and OHS Foundation Grant 259333 (to D.B.B.). Back

Received January 15, 1999.

Revised March 5, 1999.

Accepted March 15, 1999.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Vingerhoeds AC, Thijssen JH, Schwarz F. 1976 Spontaneous hypercortisolism without Cushing’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 43:1128–1133.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Chrousos GP, Vingerhoeds A, Brandon D, et al. 1982 Primary cortisol resistance in man. A glucocorticoid receptor-mediated disease. J Clin Invest. 69:1261–1269.
  3. Malchoff CD, Javier EC, Malchoff DM, et al. 1990 Primary cortisol resistance presenting as isosexual precocity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 70:503–507.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Iida S, Gomi M, Moriwaki K, et al. 1985 Primary cortisol resistance accompanied by a reduction in glucocorticoid receptors in two members of the same family. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 60:967–971.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Bronnegard M, Werner S, Gustafsson JA. 1986 Primary cortisol resistance associated with a thermolabile glucocorticoid receptor in a patient with fatigue as the only symptom. J Clin Invest. 78:1270–1278.
  6. Corvol D, Funder J. 1994 The enigma of pseudohypoaldosteronism [Editorial; Comment]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 79:25–26.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Zennaro MC. 1996 Mineralocorticoid resistance. Steroids. 61:189–192.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. McPhaul MJ, Marcelli M, Zoppi S, Griffin JE, Wilson JD. 1993 Genetic basis of endocrine disease. IV. The spectrum of mutations in the androgen receptor gene that causes androgen resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 76:17–23.[Abstract]
  9. Smith EP, Boyd J, Frank GR, et al. 1994 Estrogen resistance caused by a mutation in the estrogen-receptor gene in a man. N Engl J Med. 331:1056–1061.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Keller DW, Wiest WG, Askin FB, Johnson LW, Strickler RC. 1979 Pseudocorpus luteum insufficiency: a local defect of progesterone action on endometrial stroma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 48:127–132.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Simpson HW, McArdle CS, Griffiths K, Turkes A, Beastall GH. 1998 Progesterone resistance in women who have had breast cancer. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 105:345–351.[Medline]
  12. Hughes MR, Malloy PJ, Kieback DG, et al. 1988 Point mutations in the human vitamin D receptor gene associated with hypocalcemic rickets. Science. 242:1702–1705.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Refetoff S, Weiss RE, Usala SJ. 1993 The syndromes of resistance to thyroid hormone. Endocr Rev. 14:348–399.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Hewison M, Rut AR, Kristjansson K, et al. 1993 Tissue resistance to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D without a mutation of the vitamin D receptor gene. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 39:663–670.[Medline]
  15. Ferriman D, Gallway JD. 1961 Clinical assessment of body hair growth in women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 21:1441–1447.
  16. Abraham G, Corrales P, TEller R. 1972 Radioimmunoassay of plasma 17-hydroxyprogesterone. Anal Lett. 5:915.
  17. Abraham GE, Manlimos FS, Solis M, Wickman AC. 1975 Combined radioimmunoassay of four steroids in one ml of plasma: II. Androgens. Clin Biochem. 8:374–378.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Korth-Schutz S, Levine LS, New MI. 1976 Serum androgens in normal prepubertal and pubertal children and in children with precocious adrenarche. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 42:117–124.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Rauh W, Levine LS, Gottesdiener K, et al. 1979 Adrenocortical function, electrolyte metabolism, and blood pressure during prolonged adrenocorticotropin infusion in juvenile hypertension. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 49:52–57.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. 1991 Current protocols in immunology. In: Coligan JE, Kruisbeek AM, Margulies DH, Shevaach EM, Strover W, eds. New York: Wiley and Sons; 7.22.1.
  21. Cidlowski JA, Bellingham DL, Powell-Oliver FE, Lubahn DB, Sar M. 1990 Novel antipeptide antibodies to the human glucocorticoid receptor: recognition of multiple receptor forms in vitro and distinct localization of cytoplasmic and nuclear receptors. Mol Endocrinol. 4:1427–1437.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Brandon DD, Kendall JW, Alman K, Tower P, Loriaux DL. 1995 Inhibition of dexamethasone binding to human glucocorticoid receptor by New World primate cell extracts. Steroids. 60:463–466.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. 1989 Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.
  24. Brandon DD, Markwick AJ, Chrousos GP, Loriaux DL. 1989 Glucocorticoid resistance in humans and nonhuman primates. Cancer Res. 49:2203s–2213s.
  25. Albertson BD, Brandon DD, Chrousos GP, Loriaux DL. 1987 Adrenal 11-hydroxylase activity in a hypercortisolemic New World primate: adaptive intra-adrenal changes. Steroids. 49:497–505.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Chrousos GP, Loriaux DL, Tomita M, et al. 1986 The new world primates as animal models of glucocorticoid resistance. Adv Exp Med Biol. 196:129–144.[Medline]
  27. Lipsett MB, Chrousos GP, Tomita M, Brandon DD, Loriaux DL. 1985 The defective glucocorticoid receptor in man and nonhuman primates. Recent Prog Horm Res. 41:199–247.
  28. Coe CL, Savage A, Bromley Lj. 1992 Plylogenetic influences on hormonal levels across the primate order. Am J Primatol. 28:81–100.[CrossRef]
  29. Chrousos GP, Renquist D, Brandon D, et al. 1982 The squirrel monkey: receptor-mediated end-organ resistance to progesterone? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 55:364–368.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Chrousos GP, Loriaux DL, Brandon D, et al. 1984 Adaptation of the mineralocorticoid target tissues to the high circulating cortisol and progesterone plasma levels in the squirrel monkey. Endocrinology. 115:25–32.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Pugeat M, Rocle B, Chrousos GP, Dunn JF, Lipsett MB, Nisula BC. 1984 Plasma testosterone transport in primates. J Steroid Biochem. 20:473–478.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Snipes CA, Forest MG, Migeon CJ. 1969 Plasma androgen concentrations in several species of Old and New World monkeys. Endocrinology. 85:941–945.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Chrousos GP, Brandon D, Renquist DM, et al. 1984 Uterine estrogen and progesterone receptors in an estrogen- and progesterone–"resistant" primate. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 58:516–520.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Reynolds PD, Pittler SJ, Scammell JG. 1997 Cloning and expression of the glucocorticoid receptor from the squirrel monkey (Saimiri boliviensis boliviensis), a glucocorticoid-resistant primate. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 82:465–472.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Scammell JG, Reynolds PD, Elkhalifa MY, Tucker JA, Moore CM. 1997 An EBV-transformed owl monkey B-lymphocyte cell line [Letter]. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 33:88–91.
  36. Brandon D, Kendall J, Loriaux D. Characterization and partial purification of an inhibitor of glucocorticoid binding from a New World primate [Abstract]. Proc of the 80th Annual Meeting of The Endocrine Society, New Orleans, LA, 1998; P2–407.
  37. Chen H, Arbelle JE, Gacad MA, Allegretto EA, Adams JS. 1997 Vitamin D and gonadal steroid-resistant New World primate cells express an intracellular protein which competes with the estrogen receptor for binding to the estrogen response element. J Clin Invest. 99:669–675.[Medline]
  38. Gacad MA, Chen H, Arbelle JE, Le Bon T, Adams JS. 1997 Functional characterization and purification of an intracellular vitamin D-binding protein in vitamin D-resistant New World primate cells. Amino acid sequence homology with proteins in the hsp-70 family. J Biol Chem. 272:8433–8440.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Tsai MJ, O’Malley BW. 1994 Molecular mechanisms of action of steroid/thyroid receptor superfamily members. Annu Rev Biochem. 63:451–486.[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Onate SA, Tsai SY, Tsai MJ, O’Malley BW. 1995 Sequence and characterization of a coactivator for the steroid hormone receptor superfamily. Science. 270:1354–1357.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Xu J, Qiu Y, De Mayo FJ, Tsai SY, Tsai MJ, O’Malley BW. 1998 Partial hormone resistance in mice with disruption of the steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1) gene. Science. 279:1922–195.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Chen H, Lin RJ, Schiltz RL, et al. 1997 Nuclear receptor coactivator ACTR is a novel histone acetyltransferase and forms a multimeric activation complex with P/CAF and CBP/p300. Cell. 90:569–580.[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Kamei Y, Xu L, Heinzel T, et al. 1996 A CBP integrator complex mediates transcriptional activation and AP-1 inhibition by nuclear receptors. Cell. 85:403–414.[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Takeshita A, Yen PM, Misiti S, Cardona GR, Liu Y, Chin WW. 1996 Molecular cloning and properties of a full-length putative thyroid hormone receptor coactivator. Endocrinology. 137:3594–3597.[Abstract]
  45. Voegel JJ, Heine MJ, Zechel C, Chambon P, Gronemeyer H. 1996 TIF2, a 160 kDa transcriptional mediator for the ligand-dependent activation function AF-2 of nuclear receptors. EMBO J. 15:3667–3675.[Medline]
  46. Hong H, Kohli K, Trivedi A, Johnson DL, Stallcup MR. 1996 GRIP1, a novel mouse protein that serves as a transcriptional coactivator in yeast for the hormone binding domains of steroid receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 93:4948–4952.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Torchia J, Rose DW, Inostroza J, et al. 1997 The transcriptional co-activator p/CIP binds CBP and mediates nuclear-receptor function. Nature. 387:677–684.[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. Li H, Gomes PJ, Chen JD. 1997 RAC3, a steroid/nuclear receptor-associated coactivator that is related to SRC-1 and TIF2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 94:8479–8484.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Anzick SL, Kononen J, Walker RL, et al. 1997 AIB1, a steroid receptor coactivator amplified in breast and ovarian cancer. Science. 277:965–968.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Petrij F, Giles RH, Dauwerse HG, et al. 1995 Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome caused by mutations in the transcriptional co-activator CBP. Nature. 376:348–351.[CrossRef][Medline]
  51. Lin BC, Hong SH, Krig S, Yoh SM, Privalsky ML. 1997 A conformational switch in nuclear hormone receptors is involved in coupling hormone binding to corepressor release. Mol Cell Biol. 17:6131–6138.[Abstract]
  52. Grignani F, Fagioli M, Alcalay M, et al. 1994 Acute promyelocytic leukemia: from genetics to treatment. Blood. 83:10–25.[Free Full Text]
  53. Grignani F, De Matteis S, Nervi C, et al. 1998 Fusion proteins of the retinoic acid receptor-{alpha} recruit histone deacetylase in promyelocytic leukaemia. Nature. 391:815–818.[CrossRef][Medline]
  54. McKusick V. 1994 Catalogs of human genes and genetic disorders. In: Mendelian inheritance in man. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  55. Scatchard G. 1949 The attraction of proteins for small molecules and ions. Ann NY Acad Sci. 51:660–672.[CrossRef]
  56. Riddick L, Chrousos GP, Jeffries S, Pang S. 1994 Comparison of adrenocorticotropin and adrenal steroid responses to corticotropin-releasing hormone vs. metyrapone testing in patients with hypopituitarism. Pediatr Res. 36:215–220.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
H. Chen, M. Hewison, B. Hu, and J. S. Adams
Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) binding to hormone response elements: A cause of vitamin D resistance
PNAS, May 13, 2003; 100(10): 6109 - 6114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Vottero, T. Kino, H. Combe, P. Lecomte, and G. P. Chrousos
A Novel, C-Terminal Dominant Negative Mutation of the GR Causes Familial Glucocorticoid Resistance through Abnormal Interactions with p160 Steroid Receptor Coactivators
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2002; 87(6): 2658 - 2667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
H. A. Molenda, A. L. Griffin, A. P. Auger, M. M. McCarthy, and M. J. Tetel
Nuclear Receptor Coactivators Modulate Hormone-Dependent Gene Expression in Brain and Female Reproductive Behavior in Rats
Endocrinology, February 1, 2002; 143(2): 436 - 444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
I. A. Hughes
Minireview: Sex Differentiation
Endocrinology, August 1, 2001; 142(8): 3281 - 3287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
I. A. Hughes
A Novel Explanation for Resistance to Androgens
N. Engl. J. Med., September 21, 2000; 343(12): 880 - 882.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
Editorial: A New "New" Syndrome in the New World: Is Multiple Postreceptor Steroid Hormone Resistance Due to a Coregulator Defect?
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 1999; 84(12): 4450 - 4453.
[Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by New, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by O’Malley, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by New, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by O’Malley, B.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals