help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tao, C.
Right arrow Articles by Cowell, C. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tao, C.
Right arrow Articles by Cowell, C. T.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 84, No. 11 4293-4294
Copyright © 1999 by The Endocrine Society


Letters to the Editor

No Association Was Found between Collagen {alpha}I Type 1 Gene and Bone Density in Prepubertal Children

Chang Tao, Sarah Garnett, Vida Petrauskas and Christopher T. Cowell

Robert Vines Growth Research Centre New Children’s Hospital, Westmead 2145, Australia

Several candidate genes have been identified that may influence bone mineral density (BMD) (1). Among these candidate genes, polymorphism of the collagen {alpha} I type 1 (CollA1) gene has been reported to cause differences in BMD in patients with osteoporosis and in normal Caucasian population (2). Subsequently, another study in 1778 Caucasian postmenopausal women showed that the ColIA1 gene was related to decreased vertebral bone mass and vertebral fractures (3). Therefore, it has been speculated that the ColIA1 gene, as an osteoporosis candidate gene, mainly affects the rate of bone loss in the aged population rather than attainment of peak bone mass. We read with interest the study by Sainz et al. (4), which reported that a polymorphism in the Sp1 binding site of the ColIA1 gene affected cancellous volumetric BMD (vBMD) in prepubertal Mexican-American girls. We report here our findings on the effect of this polymorphism in the Sp1 binding site of the ColIA1 gene in prepubertal boys and girls in a Caucasian population.

Two hundred fifty-eight healthy prepubertal Caucasian children (138 girls and 120 boys) in a narrow age range (7.0–8.9 years) participated in a study, which had been approved by the New Children’s Hospital Ethics committee. Bone density was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry using LUNAR DPX (LUNAR Radiation Corp., Madison, WI). The v-BMD (g/cm3) was calculated from BMD at the femoral neck (FN) and lumbar spine (LS), as described previously (5). The effect of the genotypes on subject characteristics and bone density was compared by analysis of variance. The distribution of genotypes of the ColIA1 gene was compared between our data and that of Sainz et al. (4) by Z-test on proportions. Significance levels were set at less than 0.05. We found no association between the Sp1 genotypes of the ColIA1 gene and vBMD at both LS and FN and (Table 1Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Age, vBMD of LS and FN and Sp1 genotypes of ColIA1 gene in girls and boys

 
However, we did find the distribution of Sp1 genotypes of the ColIa1 gene in our Caucasian female population was different to that of the female population from Mexican-American background (4) (see Table 2Go). No data were available for Mexican-American males, and so they are not compared.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Comparison of the distribution of genotypes of ColIA1 gene in different population

 
The haplotype ’S’ frequency was 0.81 in the female Caucasian population and 0.89 in the female Mexican-American population. The distribution of genotypes of ColIA1 gene in our study was similar to the Caucasian female population (SS 67.1%, Ss 29.5% and ss 3.3%) reported by Uitterlinden et al. (3).

The explanation for the difference on effect of the genotypes of ColA1 gene in these two different ethnic prepubertal populations is not clear. The higher frequency of ss genotype in the Caucasian groups should theoretically have amplified the decrease in vBMD found by Sainz et al. (4), but there was not even a trend by genotypes in either sex, except at FN in the boys in our study. The smaller sample size with ’S’ genotype in the study of Sainz et al. (4) may have led to a selection bias. Alternatively, our study in using a calculated vBMD from dual energy x-ray absorptiometry may have missed a true difference in BMD when measured by quantitative computer tomography in the study by Sainz et al. (4). It is also possible that genotypes of the ColIA1 gene in different populations may effect different outcomes on BMD. We conclude that our data do not confirm that a polymorphism in the Sp1 binding site of the ColIa1 gene affects vBMD of FN and LS in prepubertal Caucasian girls and boys. Further studies taking account of the distribution of genotypes of ColIA1 gene in different ethnic populations are required.

References

  1. Ralston SH. 1997 Genetic markers of bone metabolism and bone disease. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl. 227:114–121.[Medline]
  2. Grant SFA, Reid DM, Blacke G, Herd R, Fogelmen I, Ralston SH. 1996 Reduced bone density and osteoporosis associated with a polymorphic Sp1 binding site in the collagen type I {alpha} 1 gene. Nat. Genet. 14:203–205.[Medline]
  3. Uitterlinden AG, Burger H, Huang Q, et al. 1998 Relation of alleles of the collagen type 1 {alpha} I gene to bone density and the risk of osteopotic fractures in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med 338:1016–102.
  4. Sainz J, van Tornout JM, Sayre J, Kaufman F, Gilsanz V. 1999 Association of collagen type 1 {alpha} 1 gene polymorphism with bone density in early childhood. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 84:853–855.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Lu PW, Briody JN, Ogle GD, et al. 1994 Bone mineral density of total body, spine, and femoral neck in children and young adults: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study. J Bone Miner Res9 :1451–1458.




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tao, C.
Right arrow Articles by Cowell, C. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tao, C.
Right arrow Articles by Cowell, C. T.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals