help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lemieux, S.
Right arrow Articles by Greenblatt, E. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lemieux, S.
Right arrow Articles by Greenblatt, E. M.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 84, No. 11 4278-4282
Copyright © 1999 by The Endocrine Society


Comments

Correction of Hyperandrogenemia by Laparoscopic Ovarian Cautery in Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome Is Not Accompanied by Improved Insulin Sensitivity or Lipid-Lipoprotein Levels1

Simone Lemieux2, Gary F. Lewis3, Avraham Ben-Chetrit, George Steiner and Ellen M. Greenblatt

Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (A.B.-C., E.M.G.) and Medicine and Physiology (S.L., G.F.L., G.S.), The Toronto Hospital (General Division), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2C4

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Ellen M. Greenblatt, The Toronto Hospital (General Division), EW 6–242, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2C4. E-mail: egreenblatt{at}torhosp.toronto.on.ca

Abstract

Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is a common disorder associated with hyperandrogenemia and infertility. Abdominal obesity, insulin resistance, and dyslipoproteinemias are other common metabolic disorders typically found in women with PCOS. The cause-effect relationship between hyperandrogenemia and insulin resistance-dyslipoproteinemia remains unclear. In this study, we have investigated the changes in androgenemia, insulin sensitivity, and plasma lipid-lipoprotein levels after laparoscopic ovarian cautery (LOC) for ovulation induction in eight infertile women with clomiphene citrate-resistant PCOS. After LOC, significant decreases in androstenedione (43%), testosterone (48%), and free testosterone (48%) concentrations were observed (P < 0.05). Glucose utilization during an euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp did not change after LOC. In addition, no significant changes after the surgical procedure were observed for cholesterol, triglycerides, and apolipoprotein concentrations measured in total plasma and in different lipoprotein fractions. In conclusion, within the short duration of observation of this study, our findings demonstrate that insulin resistance and lipoprotein abnormalities associated with PCOS are not secondary to hyperandrogenemia. The clinician, therefore, must be cognizant of the persistence of these metabolic risk factors for cardiovascular disease once successful ovulation and fertility is restored, and institute appropriate monitoring, counseling, and medical intervention as required.

POLYCYSTIC ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is an endocrine abnormality that affects 5–10% of women in the reproductive age group (1, 2). Women with PCOS often demonstrate abdominal obesity (3, 4), insulin resistance (4, 5, 6), and dyslipoproteinemias (7) and therefore present an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (5, 7, 8, 9, 10).

In women with PCOS as well as in those without PCOS, androgen levels have been shown to be correlated with insulin sensitivity and variables of the lipid-lipoprotein profile (5, 11, 12, 13). The cause-effect relationship between hyperandrogenemia and insulin resistance-dyslipoproteinemias remains unclear, however, and elucidating this relationship was the major purpose of the present study. Some studies that have induced a decrease in androgen concentrations with a GnRH analog in women with PCOS have failed to improve insulin sensitivity or the lipid profile (14, 15, 16), whereas others have demonstrated improvements in the metabolic profile after normalization of the concentrations of circulating androgens with spironolactone (17) or Lupron (a GnRH agonist) (18). Differences in strategies used to decrease androgen levels may partially explain these conflicting results, and differences observed between studies may reflect an effect of the particular pharmacological agent used.

Studies conducted in women with PCOS in which the insulin-sensitizing agent, troglitazone, was used to enhance insulin action have demonstrated that improved insulin sensitivity is accompanied by significant decreases in circulating androgens without changes in body weight or body fat distribution (19, 20). These studies support the idea that insulin resistance contributes causally to the hyperandrogenemia in women with PCOS.

Some mechanisms have been proposed to explain the effect of insulin on androgen concentrations (for a review, see Ref. 21). Briefly, studies have demonstrated that insulin has a stimulatory effect on the production of androgens by human ovarian stroma and theca. Insulin may act not only through insulin receptors, but also through insulin-like growth factor receptors. It has also been suggested that in some insulin-resistant states such as PCOS, the ovary would remain sensitive to the action of insulin, acting through either its own receptor or an insulin-like growth factor receptor, and this could explain how hyperinsulinemia associated with insulin resistance is associated with increased androgen production.

In the present study, laparoscopic ovarian cautery (LOC) was performed to treat ovulatory infertility in women with PCOS who had previously failed clomiphene citrate therapy. LOC is an endoscopic procedure that is associated with a fall in circulating androgen levels and with a restoration of ovulation in 80–85% of women with PCOS (see Ref. 22 for a review) through mechanisms that are not well resolved. Apart from the effects of LOC on androgen levels and ovulation that have already been documented (23), this study was designed to evaluate the impact of LOC on insulin sensitivity (as determined by the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp) and variables of the plasma lipid-lipoprotein profile. We hypothesized that nonphamacological reduction of serum androgen levels in patients with PCOS would have no effect on plasma lipids/lipoproteins or insulin sensitivity.

Subjects and Methods

Subjects

Seventeen women with PCOS who had failed to ovulate or failed to conceive with at least six cycles of clomiphene citrate, up to a dose of 200 mg/day for 5 consecutive days (with or without hCG), were offered LOC. In addition, five of these women had already attempted and failed to conceive after gonadotropin therapy, three had failed to conceive after complications of gonadotropin therapy, and two had previously failed in vitro fertilization. Aside from PCOS, all women were otherwise healthy and taking no medications. Diabetes was excluded in all patients by performing a 3-h oral glucose tolerance test. Baseline measurements of serum androgen concentrations, insulin sensitivity, and plasma lipid-lipoprotein profile were performed. This study was approved by The Toronto Hospital committee for research on human subjects, and all subjects gave their written informed consent before their participation in the study.

Laparoscopic ovarian cautery

Laparoscopic ovarian cautery was performed under general anesthetic, on an out-patient basis, using a standard three-puncture technique and video guidance as previously described (23). All patients were discharged the same day, and there were no intraoperative complications. All patients maintained menstrual cycle calendars and basal body temperature charts immediately after LOC. Serum progesterone concentrations were used to confirm ovulation.

Follow-up

Three of the 17 women who underwent LOC failed to ovulate for at least 3 cycles postoperatively. Fourteen of the 17 women (82%) initiated regular ovulatory cycles (25–35 days) after LOC. Six of them conceived within 3 ovulatory cycles and therefore could not undergo postoperative metabolic evaluation. Eight women who ovulated for at least 3 cycles postoperatively, but who had not yet conceived, were available for postoperative assessment. All postoperative metabolic evaluations occurred between days 2 and 7 of their fourth menstrual cycle, on the same day as the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp study (preoperatively the women were not cycling). Measurements performed at baseline and at follow-up are described in the following sections.

Euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp

The euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp was performed after a 12-h overnight fast. An antecubital arm vein was cannulated with a catheter for infusion of insulin and 20% dextrose. A hand vein from the contralateral arm was cannulated, the cannula was attached to a three-way stopcock, and the hand was placed in a thermoregulated Plexiglas box maintained at 55 C to permit sampling of arterialized blood for determination of plasma insulin and glucose levels. A primed continuous infusion of insulin (Humulin, 40 mU/m2·min) was begun and continued for 2 h (24). Blood was withdrawn every 5 min for measurements of plasma glucose, and measurement of insulin levels was performed every 15 min. The dextrose infusion rate was adjusted to maintain euglycemia. The glucose disposal rate was calculated from the mean glucose infusion rate measured during the last 30 min of the test. The validity of these measurements assumes that the endogenous glucose production has been completely suppressed during the insulin infusion. We assume that endogenous glucose production was more than 90% suppressed, as complete suppression using a similar insulin infusion rate, and [3-3H]glucose turnover methodology has been reported by others in obese subjects. (25).

Plasma glucose concentrations were measured at the bedside using an automated glucose analyzer (Glucose Analyser II, Beckman Coulter, Inc., Fullerton, CA), whereas plasma insulin levels were determined by RIA, using a double antibody separation method (Pharmacia Diagnostics, Uppsala, Sweden) (26).

Plasma lipid-lipoprotein profile

Fasting blood samples were drawn into Na2 ethylenediamine tetraacetate (1 mg/mL) and chilled to 4 C. The plasma was adjusted at a density of 1.019 g/mL and spun at 39,000 rpm in a 70.1 Ti rotor (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Palo Alto, CA) for 18 h at 4 C to obtain the Sf >12 fraction [intermediate density lipoprotein (IDL) and very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) fractions]. The Sf >12 was overlaid with a solution of density 1.006 g/mL and spun at 29,000 rpm in an SW-40 bucket rotor (Beckman Coulter, Inc.) for 2 h at 15 C to obtain the VLDL (top) and the IDL (bottom) fractions. The high density lipoprotein (HDL) fraction was separated after manganese/heparin precipitation of plasma apolipoprotein B (Apo B)-containing lipoproteins (27).

Cholesterol (Chol) and triglycerides (TG) were measured enzymatically in the plasma and in the VLDL, IDL, and HDL fractions (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Laval, Canada). LDL-chol and LDL-TG concentrations were obtained by difference. Apo B was quantified in whole plasma and in VLDL and IDL fractions by an electroimmunoassay procedure (28). The LDL-Apo B was then calculated by subtraction. Apo A1 was determined in whole plasma by a rocket electroimmunoassay using the Sebia Hydragel Apo A1B kit (Gelman Sciences, Toronto, Canada; catalog no. 4050) according to the method of Laurell (29).

Nondenaturing 2–16% polyacrylamide gel (purchased from David Rainwater, Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research, San Antonio, TX) electrophoresis was performed on whole plasma to determine LDL particle size, according to the procedure of Krauss et al. (30). A volume of 5 µL plasma was applied to the gel, and electrophoresis was performed at 125 V for 16 h. A mixture of standard molecular weight proteins of known diameter (HMW Calibration Kit, Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ) consisting of thyroglobulin, ferritin, catalase, lactate dehydrogenase, and albumin was applied to a separate lane in each gel along with Lp(a) and LDL standards for which diameters were determined by electron microscopy. Gels were stained for proteins with Coomassie brilliant blue G-250 (Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY) in perchloric acid (0.1% stain and 5% perchloric acid) for 24 h and destained for 2 days in 7% acetic acid. The diameters of the particles were assessed with a densitometer (ImageMaster DTS, Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden) and with Image Master computer software (Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden) based on the distance of migration relative to the standards.

Steroid profile

Testosterone, free testosterone, and 17{alpha}-hydroxyprogesterone were measured by RIA using kits supplied by Diagnostic Products (Los Angeles, CA). The androstenedione RIA kit was supplied by Diagnostics Systems Laboratories, Inc. (Webster, TX). Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) was measured by RIA using the Coat-A-Count DHEAS commercial kit (Diagnostic Products).

Statistical analyses

The significance of changes in variables measured before and after LOC were tested with the paired Student’s t test. Wilcoxon signed rank tests were performed when values were not normally distributed. For insulin concentrations measured during the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp, ANOVA on repeated measurements was performed to determine whether insulin levels remained in steady state during the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp. Statistical analyses were performed with SigmaStat software (SigmaStat for Windows, version 1.0, Jandel Corp., San Rafael, CA). Data are presented throughout the manuscript as the mean ± SD. P < 0.05 was assumed to be significant.

Results

Women who completed the two phases of the study had a mean age of 31 ± 2.7 (±SD) yr. They were generally obese, with a mean body mass index of 31.7 ± 4.4 kg/m2 (ranging from 23.1–39.1 kg/m2), and no change in body mass index was found after LOC. The baseline demographic and biochemical data from the nine subjects who were screened but who did not complete both phases of the study were analyzed, and there were no significant differences compared to the eight subjects reported.

Figure 1Go shows that significant decreases in serum concentrations of androstenedione (44%), testosterone (48%), free testosterone (48%), and 17{alpha}-hydroxyprogesterone (53%) were observed after LOC (P < 0.05), whereas no significant change in DHEAS (2% decrease) was seen.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Androstenedione, testosterone, free testosterone, DHEAS, and 17{alpha}-hydroxyprogesterone levels before and after LOC. *, Significantly different from the value measured before LOC, P < 0.05.

 
Figure 2Go shows that no changes in fasting plasma glucose were observed after LOC (from 5.3 ± 0.6 to 5.2 ± 0.6 mmol/L). Although the group mean of fasting plasma insulin levels after LOC (112.3 ± 76.2 pmol/L) was lower than that before (132.1 ± 156.2 pmol/L), there was a high degree of variability between individuals, and by paired analysis, there was no significant change. The glucose disposal rate after LOC was unaltered (from 3.2 ± 0.8 to 3.3 ± 1.1 mg glucose/kg·min). In Fig. 3Go, it can be seen that insulin concentrations (before and after LOC) reached a steady state after 30 min and remained constant for the following 90 min. In addition, steady state insulin concentrations during the clamp before LOC were well matched with values measured during the postoperative clamp.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Concentrations of fasting plasma glucose and insulin and glucose utilization during an euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp before and after LOC. Glucose utilization was measured during the last 30 min of the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp. Values of fasting insulin levels were not normally distributed and were therefore compared using Wilcoxon’s signed rank test. Differences were not statistically significant.

 


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Plasma insulin concentrations measured during the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp before and after LOC.

 
Table 1Go presents the plasma lipid-lipoprotein levels, before and after LOC. Cholesterol concentrations measured in total plasma or in VLDL, LDL, or HDL subfractions and the ratio of total chol/HDL-chol did not change significantly after LOC. Similarly, no change in the plasma TG concentration was observed. Apo A1 and Apo B levels as well as LDL particle size did not change significantly in response to LOC. Finally, the content of chol, TG, and Apo B of the IDL fraction was not significantly altered after LOC (results not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Plasma lipid-lipoprotein before and after LOC (n = 8)

 
Discussion

In the present study, LOC was performed in infertile women with clomiphene citrate-resistant PCOS. The LOC procedure resulted in successful restoration of the ovulatory cycles and in a marked reduction of serum androgen levels, but failed to correct insulin sensitivity or improve the plasma lipid-lipoprotein profile, therefore suggesting that androgens are not related in a causal fashion to insulin sensitivity and plasma lipid-lipoprotein levels. Our study differs from most others that have examined the relationship between serum androgen levels and insulin resistance, as we used a nonpharmacological method to reduce androgen levels in women with PCOS. To our knowledge, there is only one other study that has examined the effect of LOC on fasting insulin concentrations (31). In accordance with our results, the researchers reported that fasting insulin levels were not changed 1 month after LOC in a group of 10 women with PCOS.

At baseline, our sample of hyperandrogenic women was representative of many women with PCOS, as they were generally obese and showed insulin resistance. The glucose disposal rate, a measure of whole body insulin sensitivity, was about half the value previously reported in control women of reproductive age (5, 25). Although the women in the present study were not frankly dyslipidemic, they had TG levels close to the 90th percentile, HDL-chol concentrations between the 10th and 25th percentile, Apo B concentrations in the 75th percentile, and Apo A1 levels between the 5th and the 10th percentile according to the distribution of these variables reported in similar age groups (32, 33, 34). Our group of women also had small dense LDL, as their mean LDL diameter was below the cut-off point (25.5 nm) proposed for the identification of the small, dense LDL phenotype (35). Plasma total and LDL-chol concentrations were normal in these subjects, as is typically the case in insulin-resistant syndromes (36). Our group of women with PCOS, therefore, presented with dyslipoproteinemia typical of individuals with the insulin resistance syndrome (37). Similar findings have been described in weight-matched women with and without PCOS, demonstrating that the dyslipidemia that accompanies the hyperandrogenemia in women with PCOS is not explained by obesity alone (38).

Fourteen of the 17 women who underwent the LOC procedure initiated regular ovulatory cycles. As expected and as previously reported (23), restoration of ovulation was accompanied by a fall in androgen levels toward normal values, except for DHEAS, which did not change after LOC. This latter finding was not surprising, as DHEAS is mainly secreted by the adrenals rather than by the ovary. The mechanisms of action by which LOC alters the androgen profile and restores ovulation in women with PCOS remain uncertain, but is likely to involve destruction of theca and stroma, the main ovarian compartment contributing to androgen concentrations (39). It has been shown in most studies that after LOC a consistent decrease in peripheral androgen levels was the earliest and most reproducible hormonal change, with a more delayed decline in LH (39, 40, 41, 42). This is true regardless of whether ovarian cautery is performed unilaterally or bilaterally (43). Unilateral ovarian cautery induces comparable decreases in LH as well as bilateral ovulation, as does bilateral ovarian cautery. This suggests that the decrease in ovarian androgen production, secondary to destruction of stromal tissue, in turn leads to correction of disturbed ovarian-pituitary feedback that is most clearly manifested as hypersecretion of LH (43). This theory is supported by the work of Sumioki et al., who demonstrated a marked reduction of LH pulse amplitude (but not frequency), mean LH levels, and pituitary LH responsiveness to GnRH stimulation concomitant with the fall in circulating androgen levels after LOC (40).

In conclusion, our results clearly demonstrated that within the short duration of observation of this study, the lowering of androgen levels and restoration of ovulatory cycles in women with PCOS after LOC is not accompanied by improvements in insulin sensitivity or in the plasma lipid-lipoprotein profile. Infertility is usually a major concern for women with PCOS who are seeking medical help. Although LOC restores ovulation in women with PCOS, it does not seem to improve cardiovascular risk factors and type 2 diabetes risk. Therefore, in addition to medical therapy or surgery aimed at reestablishing ovulation, women with PCOS should be offered additional therapeutic strategies to improve insulin sensitivity and lipid-lipoprotein levels to reduce their risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Finally, although our results have shown that a normalization of circulating androgens is not associated with improvements in features of the insulin resistance syndrome in women with PCOS over short term observation, further studies will be needed to delineate the potential long term effects and the possible contribution of altered androgen levels to insulin resistance in other populations.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Kristine Uffelman and Linda Szeto for technical assistance, as well as Lynda Gotlieb and Dr. Carla Vanin for assistance during the hyperinsulinemic clamps.

Footnotes

1 This work was supported by the Urquhart Fund from the Toronto Hospital. Back

2 Research fellow from the Canadian Diabetes Association. Back

3 Recipient of a Career Investigator Award from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. Back

Received July 2, 1999.

Revised January 12, 1999.

Revised July 13, 1999.

Accepted July 28, 1999.

References

  1. Franks S. 1995 Polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 333:853–861.[Free Full Text]
  2. Legro RS. 1995 The genetics of polycystic ovary syndrome. Am J Med. 98:9S–16S.
  3. Goudas VT, Dumesic DA. 1997 Polycystic ovary syndrome. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 26:893–912.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Holte J. 1996 Disturbances in insulin secretion and sensitivity in women with the polycystic ovary syndrome. Balliere Clin Endocrinol Metab. 10:221–247.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Dunaif A, Segal KR, Futterweit W, Dobrjansky A. 1989 Profound peripheral insulin resistance, independent of obesity, in polycystic ovary syndrome. Diabetes. 38:1165–1174.[Abstract]
  6. Chang RJ, Nakamura RM, Judd HL, Kaplan SA. 1983 Insulin resistance in nonobese patients with polycystic ovarian disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 57:356–359.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Wild RA, Painter PC, Coulson PB, Carruth KB, Ranney GB. 1985 Lipoprotein lipid concentrations and cardiovascular risk in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 61:946–951.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Dahlgren E, Janson PO, Johansson S, Lapidus L, Oden A. 1992 Polycystic ovary syndrome and risk for myocardial infarction. Evaluated from a risk factor model based on a prospective population study of women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 71:599–604.[Medline]
  9. Birdsall MA, Farquhar CM, White HD. 1997 Association between polycystic ovaries and extent of coronary artery disease in women having cardiac catheterization. Ann Intern Med. 126:32–35.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Wild RA, Grubb B, Hartz A, Van Nort JJ, Bachman W, Bartholomew M. 1990 Clinical signs of androgen excess as risk factors for coronary artery disease. Fertil Steril. 54:255–259.[Medline]
  11. Burghen GA, Givens JR, Kitabchi AE. 1980 Correlation of hyperandrogenism with hyperinsulinism in polycystic ovarian disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 50:113–116.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Evans DJ, Hoffmann RG, Kalkhoff RK, Kissebah AH. 1983 Relationship of androgenic activity to body fat topography, fat cell morphology, and metabolic aberrations in premenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 57:304–310.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Peiris AN, Mueller RA, Struve MF, Smith GA, Kissebah AH. 1987 Relationship of androgenic activity to splanchnic insulin metabolism and peripheral glucose utilization in premenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 64:162–169.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Geffner ME, Kaplan SA, Bersch N, Golde DW, Landaw EM, Chang RJ. 1986 Persistence of insulin resistance in polycystic ovarian disease after inhibition of ovarian steroid secretion. Fertil Steril. 45:327–333.[Medline]
  15. Dunaif A, Green G, Futterweit W, Dobrjansky A. 1990 Suppression of hyperandrogenism does not improve peripheral or hepatic insulin resistance in the polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 70:699–704.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Poretsky L. 1991 On the paradox of insulin-induced hyperandrogenism in insulin-resistant states. Endocr Rev. 12:3–13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Shoupe D, Lobo RA. 1984 The influence of androgens on insulin resistance. Fertil Steril. 41:385–388.[Medline]
  18. Elkind-Hirsch KE, Valdes CT, Malinak LR. 1993 Insulin resistance improves in hyperandrogenic women treated with Lupron. Fertil Steril. 60:634–641.[Medline]
  19. Dunaif A, Scott D, Finegood D, Quintana B, Whitcomb R. 1996 The insulin-sensitizing agent troglitazone improves metabolic and reproductive abnormalities in the polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:3299–3306.[Abstract]
  20. Ehrmann DA, Schneider DJ, Sobel BE, Cavaghan MK, Imperial J, Rosenfield RL, Polonsky KS. 1997 Troglitazone improves defects in insulin action, insulin secretion, ovarian steroidogenesis, and fibrinolysis in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 82:2108–2116.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Poretsky L, Piper B. 1994 Insulin resistance, hypersecretion of LH, and a dual-defect hypothesis for the pathogenesis of polycystic ovary syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 84:613–621.[Medline]
  22. Donesky BW, Adashi EY. 1995 Surgically induced ovulation in the polycystic ovary syndrome: wedge resection revisited in the age of laparoscopy. Fertil Steril. 63:439–463.[Medline]
  23. Greenblatt E, Casper RF. 1987 Endocrine changes after laparoscopic ovarian cautery in polycystic ovarian syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 156:279–285.[Medline]
  24. DeFronzo RA, Tobin JD, Andres R. 1979 Glucose clamp technique: a method for quantifying insulin secretion and resistance. Am J Physiol 237:E214—E223.
  25. Zuniga-Guajardo S, Jimenez J, Angel A, Zinman B. 1986 Effects of massive obesity on insulin sensitivity and insulin clearance and the metabolic response to insulin as assessed by the euglycemic clamp technique. Metabolism. 35:278–282.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Livesey JH, Hodgkinson SC, Roud HR, Donald RA. 1980 Effect of time, temperature and freezing on the stability of immunoreactive LH, FSH, TSH, growth hormone, prolactin and insulin in plasma. Clin Biochem. 13:151–155.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Burstein M, Samaille J. 1960 Sur un dosage rapide du cholestérol lié aux {alpha}- et aux ß-lipoprotéines du sérum. Clin Chim Acta. 5:609.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Reardon MF, Poapst ME, Uffelman KD, Steiner G. 1981 Improved method for quantitation of B apoprotein in plasma lipoproteins by electroimmunoassay. Clin Chem. 27:892–895.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Laurell CB. 1972 Electroimmuno assay. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 124(Suppl):21–37.
  30. Krauss RM, Blanche PJ. 1992 Detection and quantitation of LDL subfractions. Curr Opin Lipidol. 3:377–383.[CrossRef]
  31. Tiitinen A, Tenhunen A, Seppala M. 1993 Ovarian electrocauterization causes LH-regulated but not insulin-regulated endocrine changes. Clin Endocrinol. 39:181–184.[Medline]
  32. Rifkind BM, Segal P. 1983 Lipid Research Clinics Program reference values for hyperlipidemia and hypolipidemia. JAMA. 250:1869–1872.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Contois JH, McNamara JR, Lammi-Keefe CJ, Wilson PW, Massov T, Schaefer EJ. 1996 Reference intervals for plasma apolipoprotein B determined with a standardized commercial immunoturbidimetric assay: results from the Framingham Offspring Study. Clin Chem. 42:515–523.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Contois J, McNamara JR, Lammi-Keefe C, Wilson PW, Massov T, Schaefer, EJ. 1996 Reference intervals for plasma apolipoprotein A-1 determined with a standardized commercial immunoturbidimetric assay: results from the Framingham Offspring Study. Clin Chem. 42:507–514.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Austin MA, King MC, Vranizan KM, Krauss RM. 1990 Atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype. A proposed genetic marker for coronary heart disease risk. Circulation. 82:495–506.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Després JP, Moorjani S, Lupien PJ, Tremblay A, Nadeau A, Bouchard C. 1990 Regional distribution of body fat, plasma lipoproteins, and cardiovascular disease. Arteriosclerosis. 10:497–511.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Haffner SM. 1996 The insulin resistance syndrome revisited. Diabetes Care. 19:275–277.[Medline]
  38. Wild RA, Bartholomew MJ. 1988 The influence of body weight on lipoprotein lipids in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 159:423–427.[Medline]
  39. Greenblatt E. 1993 Surgical options in polycystic ovary syndrome patients who do not respond to medical ovulation induction. Bailliere Clin Obstet Gynecol. 7:421–433.[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Sumioki H, Utsunomyiya T, Matsuoka K, Korenaga M, Kadota T. 1988 The effect of laparoscopic multiple punch resection of the ovary on hypothalamo-pituitary axis in polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 50:567–572.[Medline]
  41. Campo S, Felli A, Lamanna MA, Barini A, Garcea N. 1993 Endocrine changes and clinical outcome after laparoscopic ovarian resection in women with polycystic ovaries. Hum Reprod. 8:359–363.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Aakvaag A, Gjonnaess H. 1985 Hormonal response to electrocautery of the ovary in patients with polycystic ovarian disease. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 92:1258–1264.[Medline]
  43. Balen AH, Jacobs HS. 1994 A prospective study comparing unilateral and bilateral laparoscopic ovarian diathermy in women with the polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 62:921–925.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
M.L. Hendriks, J.C.F. Ket, P.G.A. Hompes, R. Homburg, and C.B. Lambalk
Why does ovarian surgery in PCOS help? Insight into the endocrine implications of ovarian surgery for ovulation induction in polycystic ovary syndrome
Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2007; 13(3): 249 - 264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K.-M. Seow, C.-C. Juan, Y.-P. Hsu, J.-L. Hwang, L.-W. Huang, and L.-T. Ho
Amelioration of insulin resistance in women with PCOS via reduced insulin receptor substrate-1 Ser312 phosphorylation following laparoscopic ovarian electrocautery
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2007; 22(4): 1003 - 1010.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K.-M. Seow, C.-C. Juan, L.-T. Ho, Y.-P. Hsu, Y.-H. Lin, L.-W. Huang, and J.-L. Hwang
Adipocyte resistin mRNA levels are down-regulated by laparoscopic ovarian electrocautery in both obese and lean women with polycystic ovary syndrome
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2007; 22(4): 1100 - 1106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
J. Vrbikova and D. Cibula
Combined oral contraceptives in the treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome
Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2005; 11(3): 277 - 291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. van Wely, N. Bayram, F. van der Veen, and P. M.M. Bossuyt
Predictors for treatment failure after laparoscopic electrocautery of the ovaries in women with clomiphene citrate resistant polycystic ovary syndrome
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2005; 20(4): 900 - 905.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Palomba, F. Orio Jr., L. G. Nardo, A. Falbo, T. Russo, D. Corea, P. Doldo, G. Lombardi, A. Tolino, A. Colao, et al.
Metformin Administration Versus Laparoscopic Ovarian Diathermy in Clomiphene Citrate-Resistant Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Prospective Parallel Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2004; 89(10): 4801 - 4809.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
R. S. Legro
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Cardiovascular Disease: A Premature Association?
Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2003; 24(3): 302 - 312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
F. C. W. Wu and A. von Eckardstein
Androgens and Coronary Artery Disease
Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2003; 24(2): 183 - 217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lemieux, S.
Right arrow Articles by Greenblatt, E. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lemieux, S.
Right arrow Articles by Greenblatt, E. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals