help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gadelha, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Frohman, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gadelha, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Frohman, L. A.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 84, No. 1 249-256
Copyright © 1999 by The Endocrine Society


Original Studies

Loss of Heterozygosity on Chromosome 11q13 in Two Families with Acromegaly/Gigantism Is Independent of Mutations of the Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type I Gene1

Monica R. Gadelha, Toni R. Prezant, Karina N. Une, Roberta P. Glick, Stanley F. Moskal, II, Mario Vaisman, Shlomo Melmed, Rhonda D. Kineman and Lawrence A. Frohman

Department of Medicine, University of Illinois (M.R.G., S.F.M., R.D.K., L.A.F.), Chicago, Illinois 60612; the Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Cedars-Sinai Research Institute, University of California (T.R.P., S.M.), Los Angeles, California 90048; the Department of Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (M.R.G., K.N.U., M.V.), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; and the Department of Neurosurgery, Cook County Hospital and Rush Medical College (R.P.G.), Chicago, Illinois 60612

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Lawrence A. Frohman, M.D., Department of Medicine (M/C 787), University of Illinois, 840 South Wood, Chicago, Illinois 60612. E-mail: frohman{at}uic.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Familial acromegaly/gigantism occurring in the absence of multiple endocrine neoplasia type I (MEN-1) or the Carney complex has been reported in 18 families since the biochemical diagnosis of GH excess became available, and the genetic defect is unknown. In the present study we examined 2 unrelated families with isolated acromegaly/gigantism. In family A, 3 of 4 siblings were affected, with ages at diagnosis of 19, 21, and 23 yr. In family B, 5 of 13 siblings exhibited the phenotype and were diagnosed at 13, 15, 17, 17, and 24 yr of age. All 8 affected patients had elevated basal GH levels associated with high insulin-like growth factor I levels and/or nonsuppressible serum GH levels during an oral glucose tolerance test. GHRH levels were normal in affected members of family A. An invasive macroadenoma was found in 6 subjects, and a microadenoma was found in 1 subject from family B. The sequence of the GHRH receptor complementary DNA in 1 tumor from family A was normal. There was no history of consanguinity in either family, and the past medical history and laboratory results excluded MEN-1 and the Carney complex in all affected and unaffected screened subjects. Five of 8 subjects have undergone pituitary surgery to date, and paraffin-embedded pituitary blocks were available for analysis. Loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 11q13 was studied by comparing microsatellite polymorphisms of leukocyte and tumor DNA using PYGM (centromeric) and D11S527 (telomeric), markers closely linked to the MEN-1 tumor suppressor gene. All tumors exhibited a loss of heterozygosity at both markers. Sequencing of the MEN-1 gene revealed no germline mutations in either family, nor was a somatic mutation found in tumor DNA from one subject in family A. The integrity of the MEN-1 gene in this subject was further supported by demonstration of the presence of MEN-1 messenger ribonucleic acid, as assessed by RT-PCR. These data indicate that loss of heterozygosity in these affected family members appears independent of MEN-1 gene changes and suggest that a novel (tissue-specific?) tumor suppressor gene(s) linked to the PYGM marker and expressed in the pituitary is essential for regulation of somatotrope proliferation.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE MAJORITY of pituitary somatotropic adenomas are sporadic, occurring at an annual incidence of 3 cases/million subjects and a prevalence of 40–60 cases/million (1, 2). These tumors are initiated by a somatic mutation in a single somatotrope followed by monoclonal proliferation (3). Subsequent accumulation of additional mutations causes activation of oncogenes and/or inactivation of tumor suppressor genes, leading to the progression of neoplasia (4, 5). It is also thought that hypothalamic and growth factors contribute to the progression of pituitary neoplasia (6).

Only a small number of somatotropinomas occur with a familial aggregation, either as isolated acromegaly/gigantism or as a component of a multiple endocrine neoplasia complex, including the Carney complex and the Wermer syndrome [multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1)]. The Carney complex exhibits an autosomal dominant phenotype characterized by myxomas, spotty skin pigmentation, and endocrine tumors (testicular, adrenal, and pituitary) (7, 8), in which up to 21% of patients have GH-secreting pituitary tumors (9). The Carney complex is genetically heterogeneous (10), with one of the responsible genes linked to chromosome 2p16 (11). MEN-1, in contrast, is an autosomal dominant predisposition to hyperplasia/tumor of the parathyroid glands, endocrine pancreas, and anterior pituitary. Forty-five percent of MEN-1 patients develop pituitary adenomas, of which 10% are somatotropinomas and 60% are prolactinomas (12).

In 1988, Larsson et al. (13) mapped the MEN-1 locus to chromosome 11q13, and 9 yr later, Chandrasekharappa et al. (14) cloned the MEN-1 gene, which encodes a 610-amino acid protein (menin) of unknown function. Agarwal et al. (15) reported a high prevalence of germline mutations in the coding region of the MEN-1 gene in 47 members of 50 MEN-1 families. This finding, coupled with the fact that loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in chromosome 11q13 occurs in pancreatic (13), parathyroid (16), and pituitary tumors (17) of MEN-1 patients, suggests that this syndrome is initiated by the complete inactivation of a tumor suppressor gene (MEN-1). This is in accord with Knudson’s "two-hit" theory, which states that initiation of neoplasia requires independent inactivation events in each copy of the tumor suppressor gene; the first hit is an inherited allelic germline mutation, and the second is a somatic deletion resulting in LOH (18).

Isolated somatotropinomas are an extremely rare subset of familial pituitary tumors. This disease is defined as the occurrence of at least 2 cases of acromegaly or gigantism in a family that does not exhibit a multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome (Carney complex or MEN-1). Only 42 cases of isolated familial acromegaly/gigantism occurring in 18 families have been reported in the literature since the biochemical diagnosis of GH excess became available (Table 1Go). The pattern of inheritance raises the possibility of multiple genetic defects. In 1997, Yamada et al. (19) reported specific LOH on chromosome 11q13 in pituitary adenomas of 2 brothers with gigantism, suggesting that familial acromegaly/gigantism may be a phenotypic variant of the MEN-1 syndrome. In the present study, we sought to explore this possibility by investigating LOH at 11q13, MEN-1 germline mutations, and MEN-1 gene expression in 2 unrelated kindreds with familial acromegaly/gigantism.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Previous reports of familial somatotropinomas

 

    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Family A

Family A, of Mexican origin, is composed of four siblings, three of whom are affected (Fig. 1Go, top panel). The index case, 2A, was a 23-yr-old man who sought medical help because of headaches, decreased vision, and progressively enlarging hands and feet. He appeared acromegalic, with a height of 173 cm, and the diagnosis was confirmed by elevated serum GH and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) levels (Table 2Go). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a macroadenoma with suprasellar extension. He underwent surgical resections in June 1993 (craniotomy) and July 1994 (transsphenoidal), followed by radiotherapy. In 1994, the 21-yr-old second brother (3A) was also suspected of acromegaly when he accompanied his brother (2A) to the hospital for a clinic visit. Subject 3A presented with decreased vision and had physical attributes characteristic of acromegaly (height, 165 cm). His laboratory results confirmed the diagnosis (Table 2Go). MRI revealed a macroadenoma with suprasellar extension, which was removed in January 1995 by transsphenoidal surgery, followed by pituitary irradiation. The 19-yr-old third brother (4A) was also investigated because of physical stigmata of acromegaly. He complained of headaches and gradually enlarging feet (height, 175 cm). A laboratory diagnosis of acromegaly was made (Table 2Go); however, the patient declined further evaluation or treatment. GH and IGF-I levels of the unaffected parents and sister are presented in Table 2Go for comparison. Plasma GHRH levels were normal in all subjects (data not shown). There was no history of consanguinity, and the past medical history and laboratory results excluded MEN-1 and the Carney complex in all affected and unaffected screened subjects.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Pedigree of family A (top panel) and family B (bottom panel). Generations available for study are indicated by Roman numerals, I and II. In the second generation, the subjects are represented in an age-descending order. Affected subjects are shown in shaded symbols. Arrows denote index cases. The age at diagnosis or death is shown below the symbols. The question mark denotes those individuals with a clinical history suggestive of a somatotropinoma or pituitary tumor. {circ}, Female; {square}, male; {oslash} or , deceased.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Family A: clinical and laboratory values

 
Family B

Family B, of Brazilian origin, consisted of 13 siblings, 5 of whom are affected (Fig. 1Go, lower panel). The index case (4B) presented at 24 yr of age with galactorrhea, headaches, and progressively enlarging hands and feet that had developed over the previous 4 yr. She appeared acromegalic, with a height of 165 cm and a weight of 75.5 kg, and exhibited hyperhydrosis and left temporal hemianopsia. Elevated basal GH levels and lack of GH suppression by glucose administration confirmed the diagnosis (Table 3Go). The MRI revealed a macroadenoma with infra- and suprasellar extensions. Transsphenoidal surgery was performed in June 1995, followed by radiotherapy. During the clinical history, she reported that a brother (2B) and a sister (10B) were tall in stature. Subject 2B, a 29-yr-old man (height of 224 cm), was diagnosed at 17 yr of age and had subsequently undergone two frontal craniotomies and radiotherapy. Subject 10B, a 15-yr-old female, presented with headaches and primary amenorrhea. Her height was 185 cm, and her weight was 100 kg. Serum basal GH was elevated and was not suppressed by oral glucose (Table 3Go). The computed tomography scan showed a macroadenoma with suprasellar expansion. Transsphenoidal surgery was performed in August 1995, followed by radiotherapy. Subsequent clinical and laboratory screening of the asymptomatic family members (Table 3Go) revealed that subjects 11B and 12B also had evidence of GH hypersecretion. Subject 11B, a 17-yr-old male, with a height of 172 cm and a weight of 57.5 kg, had an elevated serum basal GH value that was not suppressed during an oral glucose tolerance test (Table 3Go). The computed tomography scan revealed a microadenoma. Subject 12B, a 13-yr-old female, with a height of 164 cm and a weight of 53 kg, had elevated basal GH and IGF-I levels, and serum GH levels were not suppressed by oral glucose administration (Table 3Go). A MRI subsequently revealed a 4.0 x 2.8 x 2.4-cm pituitary macroadenoma with suprasellar extension (Fig. 2Go), confirming the diagnosis of a GH-secreting tumor. Also of interest is subject 8B, who died at the age of 16 yr with a clinical history suggestive of pituitary apoplexy. In addition, the father’s brother was reported to have "coarse" features and died at the age of 18 yr from a "brain tumor". Subject 9B died at 2 yr of age from an unrelated condition. There was no history of consanguinity, and the past medical history and laboratory results excluded MEN-1 and the Carney complex in all affected and unaffected screened subjects.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Family B: clinical and laboratory values

 


View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Preoperative, gadolinium-enhanced, T1-weighted MRI of patient 12B (13 yr old) whose leukocyte DNA allelic pattern suggested a predisposition for pituitary neoplasia. An oral glucose tolerance test confirmed the diagnosis of GH hypersecretion. A coronal view is shown in the upper panel, and a sagittal view is shown in the lower panel. A macroadenoma (4.0 x 2.8 x 2.4 cm) is present with suprasellar extension and compression of the optic chiasm.

 
Tumor histology

Paraffin tumor blocks were sectioned (5 µm) and stained with hematoxylin-eosin or subjected to immunocytochemistry for GH and PRL using the standard avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex technique. The primary antibodies used in the reaction have been previously characterized [GH, 1:5000 (20); PRL, 1:5000 (NIH)].

Analysis of LOH on chromosome 11q13

The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of the University of Illinois at Chicago with the informed consent of all subjects. Pituitary adenoma tissue was obtained from paraffin-embedded blocks (patients 2A, 3A, 2B, 4B, and 10B). Fifteen sections (5 µm) were deparaffinized and incubated with 100–300 µL digestion buffer containing 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 8.5), 1 mmol/L ethylenediamine tetraacetate, 0.5% Tween-20 (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO), and 0.1–0.2 mg/mL proteinase K (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY). Samples were incubated at 37 or 55 C for 120 h. After centrifugation, the supernatant was transferred to a fresh tube and proteinase K heat inactivated (95 C, 8 min). Organic extraction (phenol-chloroform) was necessary to obtain PCR products from tumor sample 10B.

Peripheral blood samples were collected from all eight patients, their parents, and unaffected siblings. DNA was extracted from leukocytes with DNAzol (Life Technologies). The concentration of leukocyte DNA was determined spectrophotometrically.

Tumor DNA (3 µL) or leukocyte DNA (500 ng) was amplified using primers specific for microsatellite markers, PYGM (CA GA) and D11S527 (Research Genetics, Inc., Huntsville, AL), both of which are on chromosome 11q13 and closely linked to the MEN-1 gene. The repeat CA GA is located within the muscle glycogen phosphorylase gene (PYGM), which is centromeric to the MEN-1 gene, whereas D11S527 is telomeric. The reverse primer of each oligonucleotide pair was end labeled with [{gamma}-32P]ATP using the 5' DNA Terminus Labeling System kit (Life Technologies). The PCR reaction mixture (20 µL) contained 1 x PCR buffer (Perkin Elmer, Norwalk, CT), 1.0 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.2 mmol/L deoxy (d)-NTPs (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN), 0.25 µmol/L primers, and 1.5 U AmpliTaq (Perkin Elmer). A "hot start" was performed at 95 C for 90 s, and each of the 39 subsequent cycles consisted of denaturation at 94 C for 40 s, annealing at 62 C for 40 s, and extension at 72 C for 60 s, followed by a final extension at 72 C for 5 min. Leukocyte and tumor DNA products were electrophoresed in a 6% polyacrylamide-8.3 mol/L urea gel. The PCR products were visualized by PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) or autoradiography. The predicted sizes of PYGM and D11S527 alleles were 156–190 and 142–166 bp, respectively; the markers were considered informative if leukocyte DNA showed heterozygosity. The intensity of the alleles was measured by image analysis of the PhosphorImager (ImageQuant, Molecular Dynamics, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA). A greater than 50% decrease or the absence of one of the expected PCR products in the tumor sample compared with the leukocyte sample was interpreted as LOH.

MEN-1 gene sequencing

Tumor DNA was obtained from 15–20 sections (7 µm) from paraffin-embedded tissue. Sections were deparaffinized and treated with 0.5 mg/mL proteinase K (Ambion, Inc., Austin, TX) in 200 µL 1 x Perkin Elmer PCR buffer without MgCl2 (37 C). The proteinase K was heat inactivated at 95 C for 5 min, and the DNA was further purified using the QIAamp tissue kit (Qiagen, Santa Clarita, CA) and eluted with 100 µL 0.5 x kit buffer (AE).

Leukocyte DNA of one affected and one unaffected member of each family (3A, 1A, 4B, and 1B) and tumor DNA from subjects 3A and 4B were used for sequencing. Nine coding exons and 17 splice junctions of the MEN-1 gene were amplified by PCR in 50-µL reactions containing 150 ng leukocyte DNA or 5 µL tumor DNA, 1 x PCR buffer with 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.2 mmol/L dNTPs, 10 pmol primer, and 2.5 U AmpliTaq Gold (Perkin Elmer). Dimethylsulfoxide (10%) was included for the amplification of exon 10. PCR conditions were 94 C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 94 C for 30 s, 55–60 C for 30 s, and 72 C for 1–2 min. The annealing temperature depended on primers, whereas the extension time varied with product length. PCR products are shown in Table 4Go with their associated exon coordinates.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Genomic coordinates of PCR products and sequencing primers

 
The PCR products were either used directly or gel isolated (Qiagen) for sequence analysis with the [{alpha}-33P]dideoxy-NTP ThermoSequenase kit (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL). Reactions were electrophoresed in 6% acrylamide-7 mol/L urea gels and autoradiographed. Dimethylsulfoxide (10%) was included for exon 2 (2652R) and exon 10 sequence reactions. The genomic DNA coordinates for the primers used in the sequencing reactions are provided in Table 4Go. Sequencing of the MEN-1 gene from tumor DNA required PCR amplification of shorter sequence motifs, also shown in Table 4Go.

MEN-1 gene expression

A small fragment of tumor from patient 3A was collected at surgery and stored at -70 C. Total ribonucleic acid (RNA) was extracted according to the Tri Reagent protocol (Molecular Research Center, Inc., Cincinnati, OH) with the exception that the aqueous phase was further purified by extraction with phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1; pH 5.2; Fisher Scientific International, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA). RNA was resuspended in 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.6) and 1 mmol/L ethylenediamine tetraacetate, and RNA concentration was determined spectrophotometrically.

Total RNA (1 µg) was reverse transcribed using the Superscript Preamplification System for First Strand Complementary DNA (cDNA) Synthesis Protocol (Life Technologies), primed with random hexamers (0.2 µg). One tenth (2 µL) of the RT reaction was amplified by PCR in a final volume of 50 µL that included 1 x PCR buffer (Perkin Elmer), 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.2 mmol/L dNTPs (Boehringer Mannheim), 0.2 µmol/L primers, and 2.5 U AmpliTaq (Perkin Elmer). The PCR conditions were denaturation at 95 C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles of 94 C for 1 min, 62 C for 1 min, 72 C for 2 min, and a final extension at 72 C for 15 min. A 25-µL aliquot of the PCR product was analyzed by gel electrophoresis using a 1.5% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide (0.5 µg/mL). The primers amplified a 382-bp product spanning nucleotides 252–633 of the MEN-1 cDNA (GenBank accession no. U93236).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Tumor histology

Immunocytochemistry revealed that all tumors were strongly positive for GH (>90% of tumor cells). Tumors 2A, 3A, 2B, and 4B did not exhibit immunoreactivity for PRL, whereas tumor 10B showed scattered PRL-positive cells (<3% of cells).

Analysis of LOH on chromosome 11q13

The microsatellite markers, PYGM and D11S527, were informative in both families. LOH on 11q13 was observed using PYGM in all five tumors studied (Figs. 3Go and 4Go). In addition, all adenomas showed LOH at 11q13 using the D11S527 (data not shown), demonstrating the extent of chromosomal loss. The chromosomal segment that was deleted (transmitted by the mother in both families) is presumed to contain the wild-type copy of the tumor suppressor gene. Consequently, the germline mutation that predisposed these individuals to neoplasia was transmitted paternally (allele C; Figs. 3Go and 4Go). Individual 13B, a 10-yr-old female, has inherited the putative mutant chromosome and is, therefore, at risk of developing a pituitary adenoma.



View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Analysis of LOH in chromosome 11q13 using the microsatellite marker PYGM in family A. Shown is a phosphorimage of a gel containing PCR-amplified genomic DNA from leukocytes (L) and tumors (T). The mother (M), father (F), and subjects 1A–4A correspond to the pedigree presented in Fig. 1Go (top panel). Lane 1 contains molecular size markers (base pairs). The position of each allele (A, B, and C) is designated to the right of the image. The allele presumed to be associated with the germline mutation (C) is designated by the asterisk.

 


View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Analysis of LOH in chromosome 11q13 using the microsatellite marker PYGM in family B. Shown is an autoradiogram of a gel containing PCR-amplified genomic DNA from leukocytes (L) and tumors (T). The mother (M), father (F), and subjects 1B–13B correspond to the pedigree presented in Fig. 1Go (bottom panel). The position of each allele (A, B, C, and D) is designated to the left of the image. Two other unaffected siblings (family B, subjects 5 and 7; Fig. 1Go) have alleles A/B and B/D, respectively (data not shown). The allele presumed associated with the germline mutation (C) is designated by the asterisk.

 
MEN-1 gene sequencing

Sequencing of PCR-amplified constitutional DNA from an affected individual in each family (3A and 4B) revealed no germline mutations within the nine coding exons and the exon-intron boundaries of the MEN-1 gene. However, leukocyte DNA of two unaffected subjects had a sequence change in intron 7. Subject 1A was homozygous with an A to G change at position 6276, whereas 1B was heterozygous at the same position (6276 A/G). These changes would not modify the splicing process and are presumed to be benign polymorphisms. In addition, no somatic mutation of the MEN-1 gene was detected in the pituitary adenoma of subject 3A, whereas sequencing of tumor DNA from subject 4B was not successful.

MEN-1 gene expression

RNA from tumor 3A and a normal pituitary (autopsy) was subjected to RT-PCR using primers from exons 2 and 3 of the MEN-1 gene. PCR products from both the tumor and normal RNA showed a 382-bp band (Fig. 5Go), which corresponded to that predicted from the MEN-1 cDNA sequence (GenBank accession no. U93236). These results demonstrate that the MEN-1 gene is effectively transcribed in the pituitary adenoma.



View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. RT-PCR of MEN-1 messenger RNA from a normal and a neoplastic (Tumor, 3A) pituitary. One microgram of RNA was reversed transcribed, and the cDNA was amplified by PCR using primers that spanned exons 2 and 3 of the MEN-1 gene. PCR products were separated on a 1.5% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide. The 382-bp PCR product was consistent with that predicted from the MEN-1 cDNA sequence.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The present report describes two unrelated families in which acromegaly/gigantism has been diagnosed in a total of eight members. The clinical manifestations of excessive GH secretion became apparent between the ages of 13–24 yr in each of the affected members of these two kindreds. Pituitary tumors in at least six of the eight subjects were invasive somatotrope macroadenomas, whereas a microadenoma was detected in subject 11B (aged 17 yr). Only one adenoma also exhibited PRL immunoreactivity. In both families, the disease was expressed among members of a single generation, although in one, an earlier generation may also have been affected. None of the affected subjects in the present report exhibited features of either the MEN-1 syndrome or the Carney complex. Furthermore, the majority of pituitary adenomas associated with the MEN-1 syndrome are usually diagnosed in the third to fifth decade and are most commonly prolactinomas (12). The pedigree in both families is similar to that reported by Yamada et al. (19), who observed two brothers with GH-secreting tumors, whereas the parent transmitting the gene (mother) was unaffected. Thus, the penetrance is incomplete and may reflect differences in genetic background, environmental factors, and/or the absence of LOH, which is a stochastic event.

Because of the limited size of each kindred and the number of affected subjects in the present study, it was not possible to conclusively establish the mode of transmission. We, therefore, initially considered the possibility of an activating mutation of the GHRH receptor, as hyperactivity of the GHRH signal transduction system can lead to somatotrope hyperplasia and/or adenoma formation (21). However, sequencing of leukocyte DNA and tumor cDNA from members of family A failed to reveal mutations in the GHRH receptor gene (data not shown).

The possibility of a loss of a tumor suppressor gene was considered by comparing the polymorphic markers, PYGM and D11S527, in leukocyte and tumor DNA. Both revealed LOH of 11q13 in all pituitary tumors tested, suggesting that a tumor suppressor gene important for somatotrope tumor formation is present at this locus. Despite the phenotypic dissimilarities between isolated familial acromegaly/gigantism and MEN-1 syndrome, the MEN-1 gene was considered a candidate because it has been shown to contain inactivating germline mutations in the majority of patients with pituitary tumors associated with the MEN-1 syndrome (14, 15). However, sequencing of the coding regions and the intron/exon boundaries of the MEN-1 gene showed no germline mutation in either family despite the presence of LOH at the 11q13 locus. These results are consistent with the recent report by Tanaka et al. (22) that detected no germline mutations within the coding region of the MEN-1 gene in two kindreds with familial acromegaly.

We also explored the possibility that the progression of neoplasia in each kindred could be due to a secondary somatic mutation in the MEN-1 gene. To investigate this possibility, tumor DNA (3A) was sequenced, but was found to be normal. This is in contrast to the report by Tanaka et al. (22) of a nonsense somatic mutation in the MEN-1 gene in one of two brothers with somatotropinomas that exhibited LOH on 11q13. We did not perform complete intron and promoter region sequencing of the MEN-1 gene or investigate methylation-dependent gene silencing (23). Therefore, we cannot be certain that the level of MEN-1 gene expression is normal in these families. However, the integrity of the MEN-1 gene in this subject (3A) is supported by our observation that the tumor expressed the MEN-1 gene, as assessed by RT-PCR. Taken together, these observations implicate a tumor suppressor gene located within chromosome 11q13 that is independent of MEN-1.

LOH of 11q13 in sporadic pituitary adenomas is not associated with genetic mutations (24, 25) or abnormal expression of the MEN-1 gene (25). When combining the results of three published studies (24, 25, 26), it appears that 11q13 allelic loss occurs more frequently in somatotropinomas (19%; 8 of 43) than in corticotropinomas (12%; 3 of 25), nonfunctioning or gonadotropinomas (11%; 8 of 72), prolactinomas (10%; 3 of 30), or thyrotropinomas (0 of 2). A recent report by Farrell et al. (27) suggests that the frequency of LOH within 11q13 in sporadic GH-producing tumors is as high as 38%. Mutational analysis of 13 GH-secreting tumors with allelic loss (24, 25, 27) revealed only 1 with an inactivating mutation of the MEN-1 gene (24). These findings together with the present report strongly suggest that a novel (tissue-specific?) tumor suppressor gene(s) is expressed in the pituitary that is essential for the modulation of somatotrope proliferation.

The very high penetrance occurring at an early age in our subjects along with the fact that the majority (63%) of reported cases of familial somatotropinomas are diagnosed before the age of 30 yr imply that the loss of this putative tumor suppressor gene, located within 11q13, is the initiating event in somatotrope tumorigenesis. Furthermore, genetic analysis of sporadic pituitary adenomas has revealed a higher frequency of invasive compared to noninvasive tumors associated with a single allelic loss at 11q13 (5). This observation coupled with the fact that the adenomas in this report were aggressive suggest that this tumor suppressor gene is not only the initiator of tumorigenesis, but exerts an effect on neoplastic progression. Genes already identified within the 11q13 locus code for a variety of proteins that have important roles in cell cycle regulation and intracellular signaling, including BclI, galanin, vascular endothelial growth factor, B56 ß-subunit of protein phosphatase 2A, fas-associating protein with death domain, ß-adrenergic receptor kinase, phospholipase C, and fibroblast growth factor-4 [which has been associated with invasive prolactinomas (28)]. Which, if any, of these genes are involved in neoplastic transformation of the somatotrope is still unclear.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors thank Dr. Clicerio Gonzalez-Villalpando (Mexico City), Drs. Rosane Silva and Joel Grego Filho (Daflon Laboratory), Romulo Cortes Domingues and Lilian Sznajder (Rio de Janeiro), and Fran Norris (Chicago) for technical assistance.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by USPHS Grants DK-30667 (to L.A.F.) and DK-50238 (to S.M.), the Bane Foundation (to L.A.F.), and the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico of the Ministry for Science and Technology of Brazil (to M.R.G.). Back

Received July 28, 1998.

Revised September 18, 1998.

Accepted September 30, 1998.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Alexander L, Appleton D, Hall R, Ross WM, Wilkinson R. 1980 Epidemiology of acromegaly in the Newcastle region. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 12:71–79.[Medline]
  2. Etxabe J, Gaztambide S, Latorre P, Vazquez JA. 1993 Acromegaly: an epidemiological study. J Endocrinol Invest. 16:181–187.[Medline]
  3. Herman V, Fagin J, Gonsky R, Kovacs K, Melmed S. 1990 Clonal origin of pituitary adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 71:1427–1433.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Fearon ER, Vogelstein B. 1990 A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell. 61:759–767.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Bates AS, Farrell WE, Bicknell EJ, et al. 1997 Allelic deletion in pituitary adenomas reflects aggressive biological activity and has potential value as a prognostic marker. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 82:818–824.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Shimon I, Melmed S. 1997 Pituitary tumor pathogenesis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 82:1675–1681.[Free Full Text]
  7. Carney JA, Gordon H, Carpenter PC, Shenoy BV, Go VL. 1985 The complex of myxomas, spotty pigmentation, and endocrine overactivity. Medicine. 64:270–283.[Medline]
  8. Carney JA, Hruska LS, Beauchamp GD, Gordon H. 1986 Dominant inheritance of the complex of myxomas, spotty pigmentation, and endocrine overactivity. Mayo Clin Proc. 61:165–172.[Medline]
  9. Stratakis CA, Kirschner LS, Papanicolaou DA, et al. Familial acromegaly beyond MEN-1: genetic and clinical studies in non-GHRH-dependent somatomammotroph hyperplasia in patients with Carney complex or an inherited chromosome 11 inversion [Abstract P3–552]. Proc of the 80th Annual Meet of The Endocrine Soc. 1998; 499.
  10. Basson CT, MacRae CA, Korf B, Merliss A. 1997 Genetic heterogeneity of familial atrial myxoma syndromes (Carney complex). Am J Cardiol. 79:994–995.
  11. Stratakis CA, Carney JA, Lin JP, et al. 1996 Carney complex, a familial multiple neoplasia and lentiginosis syndrome. Analysis of 11 kindreds and linkage to short arm of chromosome 2. J Clin Invest. 97:699–705.[Medline]
  12. Verges B, Boureille F, Goudet P, Cougard P, Calender A. Pituitary adenomas in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. The France-Belgium MEN1 multicenter study [Abstract P3–397]. Proc of the 80th Annual Meet of The Endocrine Soc. 1998; 468.
  13. Larsson C, Skogseid B, Oberg K, Nakamura Y, Nordenskjold M. 1988 Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 gene maps to chromosome 11 and is lost in insulinoma. Nature. 332:85–87.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Chandrasekharappa SC, Guru SC, Manickam P, et al. 1997 Positional cloning of the gene for multiple endocrine neoplasia-type 1. Science. 276:404–407.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Agarwal SK, Kester MB, Debelenko LV, et al. 1997 Germline mutations of the MEN1 gene in familial multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and related states. Hum Mol Genet. 6:1169–1175.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Thakker RV, Bouloux P, Wooding C, et al. 1989 Association of parathyroid tumors in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 with loss of alleles on chromosome 11. N Engl J Med. 321:218–224.[Abstract]
  17. Yoshimoto K, Iwahana H, Kubo K, Saito S, Itakura M. 1991 Allele loss on chromosome 11 in a pituitary tumor from a patient with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Jpn J Cancer Res. 82:886–889.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Knudson AG. 1971 Mutation and cancer: statistical study of retinoblastoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 68:820–823.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Yamada S, Yoshimoto K, Sano T, et al. 1997 Inactivation of the tumor suppressor gene on 11q13 in brothers with familial acrogigantism without multiple endocrine neoplasia type I. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 82:239–242.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Frohman LA, Horton ES, Lebovitz HE. 1967 Growth hormone releasing effects of a pseudomonas endotoxin (Piromen). Metabolism. 16:57–67.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Frohman LA, Downs TR. 1987 Ectopic GRH syndrome. In: Robbins RJ, Melmed S, eds. Acromegaly. New York: Plenum Press; 115–125.
  22. Tanaka C, Yoshimoto K, Yamada S, et al. 1998 Absence of germ-line mutations of the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1) gene in familial pituitary adenoma in contrast to MEN 1 in Japanese. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 83:960–965.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Jones P. 1996 Methylation errors and cancer. Cancer Res. 56:2463–2467.[Free Full Text]
  24. Zhuang Z, Ezzat SZ, Vortmeyer AO, et al. 1997 Mutations of the MEN 1 tumor suppressor gene in pituitary tumors. Cancer Res. 57:5446–5451.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Prezant TR, Levine J, Melmed S. 1998 Molecular characterization of the Men 1 tumor suppressor gene in sporadic pituitary tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 83:1388–1391.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Boggild MD, Jenkinson S, Pistorello M, et al. 1994 Molecular genetic studies of sporadic pituitary tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 78:387–392.[Abstract]
  27. Farrell WE, Bicknell EJ, Simpson DJ, et al. Mutation and expression analysis of the MEN1 gene in sporadic pituitary tumors with evidence of LOH on chromosome 11q13 [Abstract P3–553]. Proc of the 80th Annual Meet of The Endocrine Soc. 1998; 499.
  28. Shimon I, Hinton DR, Weiss MH, Melmed S. 1998 Prolactinomas express human heparin-binding secretory transforming gene (hst) protein product: marker of tumour invasiveness. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 48:23–29.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Levin SR, Hofeldt FD, Becker N, Wilson CB, Seymour R, Forsham PH. 1974 Hypersomatotropism and acanthosis nigricans in two brothers. Arch Intern Med. 134:365–367.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Kurisaka M, Takei Y, Tsubokawa T, Moriyasu N. 1981 Growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma in uniovular twin brothers. Neurosurgery. 8:226–230.[Medline]
  31. Prescott RWG, Spruce BA, Kendall Taylor P, Hall K, Hall R. Acromegaly and gigantism presenting in two brothers [Abstract P49]. Proc of the 1st Joint Meet of British Endocrine Soc, 1982.
  32. Jones MK, Evans PJ, Jones IR, Thomas JP. 1984 Familial acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 20:355–358.[Medline]
  33. Abbassioun K, Fatourehchi V, Amirjamshidi A, Meibodi NA. 1986 Familial acromegaly with pituitary adenoma. Report of three affected siblings. J Neurosurg. 64:510–512.[Medline]
  34. Pestell RG, Alford FP, Best JD. 1989 Familial acromegaly. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 121:286–289.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. McCarthy MI, Noonan K, Wass JAH, Monson JP. 1990 Familial acromegaly: Studies in three families. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 32:719–728.[Medline]
  36. Tamburrano G, Jaffrain-Rea M-L, Grossi A, Lise A, Bulletta C. 1992 L’acromegalie familiale. A propos d’une observation. Revue de la litterature. Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 53:201–207.[Medline]
  37. Links TP, Monkelbaan JF, Dullaart RPF, van Haeften TW. 1993 Growth hormone-, {alpha}-subunit- and thyrotrophin-cosecreting pituitary adenoma in familial setting of pituitary tumour. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 129:516–518.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Matsuno A, Teramoto A, Yamada S, et al. 1994 Gigantism in sibling unrelated to multiple endocrine neoplasia: case report. Neurosurgery. 35:952–956.[Medline]
  39. Xu L, Ren Z, Su C. 1995 Surgical treatment of familial acromegaly. Chinese J Surg. 33:435–436.
  40. Benlian P, Giraud S, Lahlou N, et al. 1995 Familial acromegaly: a specific clinical entity: further evidence from the genetic study of a three-generation family. Eur J Endocrinol. 133:451–456.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Kakiya S, Kawakubo A, Toyama K, Yamamoto M. 1997 Two cases of acromegaly in a family. Endocr J. 44:227–231.[Medline]
  42. Tiulpakov A, Chistiakov DA, Strebkova NA, Tourakoulov RI, Peterkova VA, Nosikov VV. A case of familial acromegaly clinically unrelated to multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: investigation of the possible cause [Abstract P3–62]. Proc of the 79th Annual Meet of The Endocrine Soc. 1997; 452.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. A. Leontiou, M. Gueorguiev, J. van der Spuy, R. Quinton, F. Lolli, S. Hassan, H. S. Chahal, S. C. Igreja, S. Jordan, J. Rowe, et al.
The Role of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor-Interacting Protein Gene in Familial and Sporadic Pituitary Adenomas
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2008; 93(6): 2390 - 2401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. A. Toledo, D. M. Lourenco Jr., B. Liberman, M. B. C. Cunha-Neto, M. G. Cavalcanti, C. B. Moyses, S. P. A. Toledo, and P. L. M. Dahia
Germline Mutation in the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Interacting Protein Gene in Familial Somatotropinoma
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2007; 92(5): 1934 - 1937.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. F. Daly, M.-L. Jaffrain-Rea, A. Ciccarelli, H. Valdes-Socin, V. Rohmer, G. Tamburrano, C. Borson-Chazot, B. Estour, E. Ciccarelli, T. Brue, et al.
Clinical Characterization of Familial Isolated Pituitary Adenomas
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2006; 91(9): 3316 - 3323.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
O. Vierimaa, M. Georgitsi, R. Lehtonen, P. Vahteristo, A. Kokko, A. Raitila, K. Tuppurainen, T. M. L. Ebeling, P. I. Salmela, R. Paschke, et al.
Pituitary Adenoma Predisposition Caused by Germline Mutations in the AIP Gene.
Science, May 26, 2006; 312(5777): 1228 - 1230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
B. S. Soares, K. Eguchi, and L. A. Frohman
Tumor Deletion Mapping on Chromosome 11q13 in Eight Families with Isolated Familial Somatotropinoma and in 15 Sporadic Somatotropinomas
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2005; 90(12): 6580 - 6587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
A Cebrian, S Ruiz-Llorente, A Cascon, M Pollan, J J Diez, A Pico, D Telleria, J Benitez, and M Robledo
Mutational and gross deletion study of the MEN1 gene and correlation with clinical features in Spanish patients
J. Med. Genet., May 1, 2003; 40(5): e72 - 72.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
E. J. Lee, T. J. Kotlar, I. Ciric, M. K. Lee, S. K. Lim, H. C. Lee, K. B. Huh, K. E. Mayo, and J. L. Jameson
Absence of Constitutively Activating Mutations in the GHRH Receptor in GH-Producing Pituitary Tumors
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2001; 86(8): 3989 - 3995.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
B. H. Jorge, S. K. Agarwal, V. S. Lando, R. Salvatori, R. R. Barbero, N. Abelin, M. A. Levine, S. J. Marx, and S. P. A. Toledo
Study of the Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1, Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone Receptor, Gs{{alpha}}, and Gi2{{alpha}} Genes in Isolated Familial Acromegaly
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2001; 86(2): 542 - 544.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. A. Stratakis and L. S. Kirschner
Isolated Familial Somatotropinomas: Does the Disease Map to 11q13 or to 2p16?
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2000; 85(12): 4920 - 4924.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
T. Abe, K. Yoshimoto, M. Taniyama, K. Hanakawa, H. Izumiyama, M. Itakura, and K. Matsumoto
An Unusual Kindred of the Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 (MEN1) in Japanese
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2000; 85(3): 1327 - 1330.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. R. Gadelha, K. N. Une, K. Rohde, M. Vaisman, R. D. Kineman, and L. A. Frohman
Isolated Familial Somatotropinomas: Establishment of Linkage to Chromosome 11q13.1-11q13.3 and Evidence for a Potential Second Locus at Chromosome 2p16-12
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2000; 85(2): 707 - 714.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gadelha, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Frohman, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gadelha, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Frohman, L. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals