help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leenhardt, L.
Right arrow Articles by Aurengo, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leenhardt, L.
Right arrow Articles by Aurengo, A.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 84, No. 1 24-28
Copyright © 1999 by The Endocrine Society


Original Studies

Indications and Limits of Ultrasound-Guided Cytology in the Management of Nonpalpable Thyroid Nodules

Laurence Leenhardt, Gilles Hejblum, Brigitte Franc, Laurence Du Pasquier Fediaevsky, Thierry Delbot, Danièle Le Guillouzic, Fabrice Ménégaux, Claudine Guillausseau, Catherine Hoang, Gérard Turpin and André Aurengo

Departments of Nuclear Medicine (L.L., L.D.P.F., D.L.G., T.D., C.G., A.A.), General and Gastrointestinal Surgery (F.M.), Pathology (C.H.), and Endocrinology (G.T.) and the Quantitative Medical Imaging Research Unit, INSERM U-494 (L.L., G.H., B.F., A.A.), Pitié Hospital, 75013 Paris; the Department of Pathology (B.F.), Ambroise Paré Hospital, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. L. Leenhardt, Service Central de Médecine Nucléaire, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, 83 boulevard de l’Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Although ultrasound (US)-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is widely prescribed in nonpalpable thyroid nodules, the goal of this study was to define precisely the indications and limits of US-FNAB in a series of 450 nonpalpable nodules. Among 94 surgically controlled cases, 20 (8 infracentimetric and 12 centimetric or supracentimetric) carcinomas were diagnosed. The diagnosis of malignancy was successfully made by US-FNAB in 16 of 20 carcinomas, 3 were missed because of insufficient cytological material, and 1 was misdiagnosed. US-FNAB sensitivity and specificity were 94% and 63%, respectively. A logistic model indicated that nodule size (P < 0.6) was not associated with histological diagnosis, but that solid hypoechoic features were more likely to be malignant (P < 0.0003), with US sensitivity and specificity for malignancy of 80% and 70%, respectively. Logistic regression indicated that adequate cytological material significantly increased with nodule size (P < 0.0001). This result outlined the limits of US-FNAB in small nodules. Hence, indication of US-FNAB appears judicious in centimetric or supracentimetric nodules or in solid and hypoechoic ones. Such a management would allow the discovery of 15 of 20 carcinomas and would avoid 16% of unnecessary biopsies.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
FINE needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is considered the most reliable test for the diagnosis of malignant thyroid nodule (1, 2, 3). In nonpalpable thyroid nodules, ultrasonography has become a main tool for FNAB guidance. Moreover, ultrasonography is the most effective method to provide information about location, number, size, echo structure, and echogenecity of thyroid nodules. As a consequence of the increasing application of ultrasound (US), the prevalence of incidental nodules in the general population has increased (4, 5). Contradictory attitudes have been proposed for the management of nonpalpable thyroid nodules. Some clinicians recommend US-guided FNAB (US-FNAB) in nonpalpable thyroid nodules (6, 7, 8), whereas others consider that a simple follow-up neck palpation is sufficient when there is no history of familial thyroid cancer or history of head/neck irradiation (5). The aim of our study was to evaluate the indications and limits of US-FNAB in the management of nonpalpable thyroid nodules in a series of 450 nodules.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients

From December 1989 to November 1995, 1741 consecutive patients with thyroid nodules were referred for FNAB in our department. Among them, 450 (26%) patients presented with nonpalpable nodules and underwent US-FNAB. These nodules had been diagnosed by US performed for various reasons (Table 1Go). Preliminary clinical examination was performed by 2 experienced endocrinologists (L.L. and T.D.) before FNAB to confirm that the nodules were not palpable (387 cases; 86%) or too deeply located (63 cases; 14%) to be reliably biopsied under palpation-guided FNAB. The series included 372 females and 78 males, with a mean age of 49.5 yr (ranging from 16–83 yr).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Indications of ultrasonography in the total series

 
Methods

US of the thyroid gland was performed using a real-time ultrasonographic scanner (Advanced Technology Laboratory, Washington DC) with a 7.5-MHz linear transducer. All scans were performed in our department by an experienced echographist (T.D.). Among the 450 nodules included in the series, 136 (30%) were solitary, whereas 314 (70%) were associated with other nodules. The echo structure (solid, mixed, or cystic), echogenecity (hyperechoic, isoechoic, or hypoechoic), calcification (presence or absence), and margin (well defined or blurred) were assessed. Cystic nodules were defined as anechoic nodules. The nodule mean diameter was considered the arithmetic mean of the measured length, width, and depth. Volume was estimated through the relation: V = (length x width x depth)/2. After a logarithmic transformation, the nodule volume distribution was Gaussian (mean = -0.058; SD = 0.46). According to the nodule volume, the series was partitioned into 10 quantiles for statistical analysis.

US-FNAB were all performed by the same physician (L.L.), using a 25-gauge needle with a free hand technique. For a partially cystic nodule, the biopsy sampling was directed to the solid portion of the nodule. In patients with more than one nodule, FNAB on only the largest one was retained. During the course of the study, some patients were subjected to repetitive FNAB. In such cases, only the result of the last FNAB was considered.

Material was smeared on slides and stained by May-Grunwald-Giemsa stain. The cytological analysis was always performed by the same pathologist (B.F.). Insufficient cytological material (ICM) was defined as the presence of less than six follicular thyroid cell clusters on the slides. Conversely, cytological material was defined as adequate when six or more thyroid cell clusters were obtained. Adequate cytological material (ACM) was classified as benign, malignant, or suspicious. Benign cytological results corresponded to colloid or macrofollicular adenomas, nodular and/or cystic goiters, or thyroiditis. Malignant cytological results corresponded to diagnosis of papillary carcinoma, high grade follicular carcinoma, or medullary or anaplastic carcinoma. Suspicious cytological results corresponded to smears with a high cellularity, microacinar formation, a scanty or absent colloid, large nuclei and noticeable anisocaryosis, and/or a dominance of Hurthle cells. Suspicious cytological results were handled as malignant diagnoses for statistical analysis.

Among the 450 patients, 94 (21%) underwent surgery. Indications for surgery were FNAB diagnosis of malignant or suspicious lesions in 40 of 94 cases (43%), supracentimetric or isolated cold nodule in 24 cases (26%), simultaneous presence of a palpable nodule in a multinodular gland in 16 cases (17%), and miscellaneous reasons in 14 cases (15%; 2 hyperthyroidism, 4 cervical adenopathy, and 7 increasing size of nodule and suspicious echographic features). The final histological diagnosis (according to the WHO classification) after surgical removal was considered the gold standard (9). Seven occult histological carcinomas found outside the biopsied nodule were not taken into account and were considered incidental.

Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL) software package. All statistical analyses involving nodule volume were performed on logarithm-transformed volume data. The relationships between the proportion of ACM and various ultrasonographic features, including nodule size, were explored using logistic regression. A logistic model including such ultrasonographic features to predict histological diagnosis was also designed.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Benign, suspicious, or malignant cytological diagnosis and ICM concerned, respectively, 293 (65%), 50 (11%), 22 (5%), and 85 (19%) of the 450 nodules (Table 2Go). Table 2Go indicates that 42 of 293 (14%) patients with benign cytological results were subjected to surgery. The corresponding data for patients with suspicious, malignant, and ICM results were 24 of 50 (48%), 16 of 22 (73%), and 12 of 85 (14%), respectively. Among the 94 operated nodules, 20 (21%) carcinomas were found at final histology, representing 4% of the population biopsied.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Cytological and histological diagnoses according to the nodule sizes

 
Adequacy of US-FNAB material

Among the 450 nodules subjected to FNAB, 365 (81%) yielded ACM, and 85 (19%) yielded ICM for diagnosis. The mean diameter of the 450 nodules as measured by ultrasonography ranged from 0.43–3.67 cm (mean, 1.33 cm; median, 1.22), and the mean diameter of the 94 operated nodules ranged from 0.57–2.6 cm (mean, 1.29 cm; median, 1.23). Table 3Go shows the proportion of ACM according to nodule volume. Considering the partition of the series in ten quantiles, this proportion varied from 64–91%. The observed variation did not significantly differ from linearity (P < 0.92), and logistic regression indicated that the proportion of ACM significantly increased (P < 0.0001) with the nodule volume.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Distribution of nodule sizes and corresponding proportions of adequate cytological material (% ACM)

 
Table 4Go details the distribution of US parameters in the series. The logistic model indicates that the proportion of ACM did not significantly differ according to the echostructure (P < 0.78), the echogenecity (P < 0.68), or the presence of calcifications (P < 0.46), but was significantly associated with well defined margins (P < 0.02).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Distribution of ultrasonographic parameters in the series and corresponding data concerning adequate cytological material (ACM), centimetric and supracentimetric nodules (>=1 cm), and histological diagnosis

 
Accuracy of US and US-FNAB in the diagnosis of malignancy

The 20 carcinomas diagnosed at final histology corresponded to 16 papillary, 3 follicular, and 1 medullary carcinomas. The ultrasonographic mean diameter of the 20 carcinomas ranged from 0.63–2.27 cm (mean, 1.23 cm; median, 1.08), and 12 of them (60%) were centimetric or supracentimetric.

Diagnosis of malignancy was successfully made by US-FNAB in 16 cases, unequivocally made in 9 cases, strongly suggested in 7 cases, and missed in 4 cases, 3 because of ICM and 1 misdiagnosed as a benign cytological result (Table 2Go). The mean diameters of 2 of 3 missed malignant nodules because of ICM, were supracentimetric (1.1 and 1.6 cm). The sensitivity of US-FNAB diagnosis in the operated nodule sample was 94%, and the specificity was 63% (Table 5Go). As shown in Table 4Go, none of the 20 malignant nodules was entirely cystic; 17 (85%) were homogeneously solid, and 3 were mixed (with cystic and solid components). Eighteen (90%) carcinomas were hypoechoic, and only 1 was hyperechoic; 16 (80%) were both homogeneously solid and hypoechoic. Calcifications and blurred margins were found, respectively, in 10 and 11 of the 20 malignant nodules; 7 malignant and 11 benign nodules presented both calcifications and blurred margins.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Accuracy of US-FNAB and ultrasonography diagnoses

 
Logistic regression indicated that a solid hypoechoic feature was a useful criterion to predict malignancy (P < 0.0003). When the solid hypoechoic feature was considered the criterion of malignancy, the sensitivity and specificity of US findings for malignancy in the operated nodule sample were 80% and 70%, respectively (Table 5Go). It should be noted that 45 of the 115 infracentimetric nodules were both solid and hypoechoic (Table 6Go). Among these, 16 were operated and 7 corresponded to carcinomas at final histology. Conversely, only 1 malignant nodule was found at final histology of the 77 cystic or hyperechoic nodules. Considering other US parameters, neither nodule size (P < 0.6), the presence of calcification (P < 0.48), nor blurred margins (P < 0.25) were significantly associated with the histological diagnosis. Benign and malignant nodules had comparable size distributions.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. Detection of histological carcinomas based on suspicious and malignant cytological results according to four strategies of FNAB indication

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
FNAB is considered to be the most effective and reliable procedure for the diagnosis of malignant thyroid nodules (2). In the literature, a variability in reported ACM proportions is observed. Several explanations have been proposed: needle size (6, 10), experience in performing FNAB (11, 12), or differences in the populations biopsied (1, 11). Yokozawa et al. and Rosen et al. report 88% and 68% ACM with US guidance, respectively (13, 14). The proportion of ACM observed in our study (81%) is within the same range. To our knowledge, the role of nodule size has not been investigated. Our results indicate that the proportion of ACM increases with the size of the nodules (Table 3Go). In our series, the proportion of ACM was 85% in centimetric and supracentimetric nodules and 69% in infracentimetric nodules. US-FNAB allowed the discovery of 10 (50%) supracentimetric of 20 histological carcinomas (Table 2Go). Therefore, our results indicate that supracentimetric nonpalpable nodules benefit from US-FNAB. Large malignant nodules have been reported to be missed by palpation (15). In a series of 145 nodules, Witterick et al. studied the size of 20 malignant nodules confirmed at histology that escaped detection by palpation. The greatest size of malignant nodules was 2.1 cm (15). Rosen et al. report 11 of 15 nonpalpable carcinomas with a diameter greater than 1 cm (14). In our study, 12 nonpalpable malignant nodules were centimetric or supracentimetric (Table 2Go). The existence of these nodules, detected by US exploration, suggests that a simple follow-up neck palpation, as previously proposed (5, 16), may not be the safest management strategy.

Our results indicate that besides size, other ultrasonographic parameters should be considered. In particular, the proportion of ACM was significantly greater for nodules with well defined margins than for nodules with blurred margins (Table 4Go). The echostructure, the presence of calcifications, and the echogenecity features were not significantly associated with ACM. The useful contribution of US guidance that directs the needle toward the solid component in cystic nodules and avoids a puncture across dense calcifications may explain our results (7, 13). Thus, we conclude that in this series, centimetric and supracentimetric size and well defined margins constitute propitious conditions for the success of the US-FNAB procedure in nonpalpable nodules.

Considering the high prevalence of US thyroid nodules (4), we believe that a systematic US-FNAB would lead to an unjustified burden for health care. Indeed, there is a low chance of detecting cancers (4% of the biopsied population in the present series), and the prognosis of the papillary thyroid microcarcinoma is good (17). The evaluation of strategies for an optimal management of thyroid nonpalpable nodules is still a matter of debate, and our study, as well as others, has some limitations.

First, the techniques are only evaluated on operated patients. Such a sample does not reflect the total biopsied population. Moreover, in most of the series, only a proportion of the malignant and suspicious cytological results are compared to histological results, whereas some patients with benign cytology are subjected to surgery. In our series, the surgical and histological data of 6 patients with malignant cytological results were unknown despite repeated efforts for obtaining information. Conversely, 42 patients with benign cytological results and 12 patients with ICM had surgery for indications detailed in Subjects and Methods, and 4 of these 54 patients had carcinoma at final histology (Table 2Go). The indications for surgery in these 4 cases were as follows: hyperthyroidism, goiter, suspicious US-FNAB results of nonpalpable adenopathy detected by ultrasound, and suspicious cytological results on an associated palpable nodule.

Second, discrepancies in the reported FNAB performances depend on the various ways the suspicious cases are handled in the calculations (18). Some authors only take into consideration benign and malignant cytological results. Others consider suspicious and/or follicular initial diagnosis as a diagnosis of malignancy and classify such cases as true positive even if they correspond to benign microfollicular adenomas (1, 2). In our study, true positive results corresponded to FNAB malignant or suspicious nodules confirmed as carcinomas at final histology.

Third, the value of US-FNAB in nonpalpable nodules has to be balanced with the clinical context. Associated thyroid disease or symptoms were useful and led to an appropriate assessment by US followed by US-FNAB in 12 carcinomas whereas 8 carcinomas were found incidentally, by screening or for questionable indications of US exploration (Table 1Go).

Nevertheless, our results led us to study the impact of four US-FNAB based strategies in the management of nonpalpable thyroid nodules. The four strategies are shown in Table 6Go and are derived from surgical exploration of suspicious and malignant cytological results:

The first strategy, US-FNAB performed on all nodules, will be used as a reference (Table 6Go). US-FNAB allowed the detection of 16 histological carcinomas and corresponded to a sensitivity of 94%. In other series reported in the literature, the sensitivity and specificity of US-FNAB amounted to 79% and 85%, respectively (6). When reviewing the results of 18,183 FNAB in 7 large series, Gharib and Goellner indicate a sensitivity of the method varying from 65–98% and a specificity varying from 72–100%; the overall accuracy was 95% (1). However, the studies only concern direct FNAB on palpable nodules. Some authors did not detect any significant difference between direct and US-guided FNAB (7). Others indicate that US guidance provides a more precise and adequate sampling with a lower rate of false negatives (19, 20). However, the palpable and nonpalpable nodules are hardly comparable in these studies. Due to the high prevalence of US thyroid nodules, a systematic US-FNAB performed on all nonpalpable nodules is not advisable.

The second strategy refers to a systematic US-FNAB performed only on centimetric and supracentimetric nodules. According to this strategy, only 10 carcinomas would have been detected; 8 of the 10 missed carcinomas would have been infracentimetric. Therefore, such a strategy does not appear advisable.

The third strategy would suggest a US-FNAB on solid and hypoechoic nodules. However, the relevance of US features for predicting malignancy is still not clearly defined. Although the low specificity of US screening of thyroid nodules has been underlined by some authors (21, 22, 23), it is generally accepted that solid hypoechoic nodules are suspicious US features (24). In our series, only 31% of the patients would be subjected to FNAB; 13 carcinomas would have been detected, 7 of these being infracentimetric. Conversely, the indication of US-FNAB in cystic or hyperechoic nonpalpable nodules is questionable.

The fourth strategy is to perform US-FNAB on centimetric, supracentimetric, or solid hypoechoic nodules. The interest of such a strategy must be balanced with those of the previous one. With the fourth strategy, 84% of the patients would be subjected to FNAB, but 15 carcinomas would be detected. In our view, this strategy, allowing the detection of carcinomas with the best reliability while avoiding a systematic US-FNAB on all nodules, should be recommended.

In conclusion, US-FNAB must be favorably considered for nonpalpable thyroid nodules, especially for the exploration of centimetric, supracentimetric, or solid hypoechoic nodules. The relative failure of US-FNAB on infracentimetric nodules is outlined and must be balanced with the high proportion of cancers detected in solid and hypoechoic nodules.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Jean-Yves Mary for his valuable statistical advice, and Nathalie Hamon for her assistance with this study. We are indebted to Gérard Karsenty and Evelyne Loyer for their skillful corrections of the manuscript edition.

Received March 20, 1998.

Revised September 30, 1998.

Accepted October 14, 1998.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Gharib H, Goellner JR. 1993 Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the thyroid: an appraisal. Ann Intern Med. 118:282–289.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Gharib H. 1994 Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules: advantages, limitations, and effect. Mayo Clin Proc. 69:44–49.[Medline]
  3. Hamburger JI. 1994 Diagnosis of thyroid nodules by fine needle biopsy: use and abuse. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 79:335–339.[Abstract]
  4. Mazzafferri EL. 1993 Management of a solitary thyroid nodule. N Engl J Med. 328:553–559.[Free Full Text]
  5. Tan GH, Gharib H. 1997 Thyroid incidentalomas: management approaches to non-palpable nodules discovered incidentally on thyroid imaging. Ann Intern Med. 126:226–231.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Cochand-Priollet B, Guillausseau PJ, Chagnon S, et al. 1994 The diagnostic value of fine-needle aspiration biopsy under ultrasonography in nonfunctional thyroid nodules: a prospective study comparing cytologic and histologic findings. Am J Med. 97:152–157.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Takashima S, Fukuda H, Kobayashi T. 1994 Thyroid nodules: clinical effect of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. J Clin Ultrasound. 22:535–542.[Medline]
  8. Lin JD, Huang BY, Weng HF, Jeng LB, Hsueh C. 1997 Thyroid ultrasonography with fine-needle aspiration cytology for the diagnosis of thyroid cancer. J Clin Ultrasound. 25:111–118.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Heidinger CHR, Sobin LH. 1974 Histological typing of thyroid tumors. In: Roto-Sadag SA, ed. International histological classification of tumors. Geneva: WHO; vol 11:17–27.
  10. Hanbidge AE, Arenson AM, Shaw PA, Szalai JP, Hamilton PA, Leonhardt C. 1995 Needle size and sample adequacy in ultrasound-guided biopsy of thyroid nodules. Can Assoc Radiol J. 46:199–201.[Medline]
  11. Burch HB, Burman KD, Reed HL, Buckner L, Raber T, Ownbey JL. 1996 Fine needle aspiration of thyroid nodules. Determinants of insufficiency rate and malignancy yield at thyroidectomy. Acta Cytol. 40:1176–1183.[Medline]
  12. McIvor NP, Freeman JL, Salem S, Elden L, Noyek AM, Bedard YC. 1994 Ultrasonography and ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of head and neck lesions: a surgical perspective. Laryngoscope. 104:669–674.[Medline]
  13. Yokozawa T, Miyauchi A, Kuma K, Sugawara M. 1995 Accurate and simple method of diagnosing thyroid nodules by the modified technique of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy. Thyroid. 5:141–145.[Medline]
  14. Rosen IB, Azadian A, Walfish PG, Salem S, Lansdown E, Bedard YC. 1993 Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in the management of thyroid disease. Am J Surg. 166:346–349.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Witterick IJ, Abel SM, Hartwick W, Mullen B, Salem S. 1993 Incidence and types of non-palpable thyroid nodules in thyroids removed for palpable disease. J Otolaryngol. 22:294–300.[Medline]
  16. Khurana KK, Richards V, Chopra P, Izquierdo R, Rubens D, Mesonero C. 1998 The role of ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the management of non-palpable and palpable thyroid nodules. Thyroid. 8:511–514.[Medline]
  17. Hay I, Grant C, Van Heerden J, Goellner J, Ebersold J, Bergstralh E. 1992 Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a study of 535 cases observed in a 50-year period. Surgery. 112:1139–1147.[Medline]
  18. Franc B, Allory Y, Hejblum. 1996 La cytoponction des tumeurs de la thyroïde. Rev Prat. 46:2315–2320.[Medline]
  19. Carmeci C, Jeffrey B, McDougall IR, Nowels K, Weigel R. 1998 Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid masses. Thyroid. 8:283–289.[Medline]
  20. Danese D, Sciacchitano S, Farsetti A, Andreoli M, Pontecorvi A. 1998 Diagnostic accuracy of conventional vs. sonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules. Thyroid. 8:15–19.[Medline]
  21. Rago T, Vitti P, Chiovato L, et al. 1998 Role of conventional ultrasonography and color flow-doppler sonography in predicting malignancy in "cold" thyroid nodules. Eur J Endocrinol. 138:41–46.[Abstract]
  22. Brkljacic B, Cuk V, Tomic-Brzac H, Bence-Zigman Z, Delic-Brkljacic D, Drinkovic I. 1994 Ultrasonic evaluation of benign and malignant nodules in echographically multinodular thyroids. J Clin Ultrasound. 22:71–76.[Medline]
  23. Takashima S, Fukuda H, Nomura N, Kishimoto H, Kim T, Kobayashi T. 1995 Thyroid nodules: re-evaluation with ultrasound. J Clin Ultrasound. 23:179–184.[Medline]
  24. Solbiati L, Volterrani L, Rizzatto G, et al. 1985 The thyroid gland with low uptake lesions: evaluation by ultrasound. Radiology. 155:187–191.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
Y. Erbil, U. Barbaros, A. Salmaslioglu, O. Mete, H. Issever, S. Ozarmagan, D. Yilmazbayhan, and S. Tezelman
Effect of Thyroid Gland Volume in Preoperative Detection of Suspected Malignant Thyroid Nodules in a Multinodular Goiter
Arch Surg, June 1, 2008; 143(6): 558 - 563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
M. J. Yeung and J. W. Serpell
Management of the Solitary Thyroid Nodule
Oncologist, February 1, 2008; 13(2): 105 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
C Cappelli, I Pirola, M Castellano, E Gandossi, E De Martino, A Delbarba, B Agosti, A Tironi, and E A. Rosei
Fine needle cytology of complex thyroid nodules
Eur. J. Endocrinol., October 1, 2007; 157(4): 529 - 532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
C. S. Hollenbeak, I. Lendel, K. S. Beus, J. M. Ruda, and B. C. Stack Jr
The Cost of Screening for Synchronous Thyroid Disease in Patients Presenting With Primary Hyperparathyroidism
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, October 1, 2007; 133(10): 1013 - 1021.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
R Jones, R Spendiff, S Fareedi, and P S Richards
The role of ultrasound in the management of nodular thyroid disease
Imaging, March 1, 2007; 19(1): 28 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
QJMHome page
C. Cappelli, M. Castellano, I. Pirola, D. Cumetti, B. Agosti, E. Gandossi, and E. Agabiti Rosei
The predictive value of ultrasound findings in the management of thyroid nodules
QJM, January 1, 2007; 100(1): 29 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
C. Cappelli, M. Castellano, I. Pirola, E. Gandossi, E. De Martino, D. Cumetti, B. Agosti, and E. A. Rosei
Thyroid nodule shape suggests malignancy.
Eur. J. Endocrinol., July 1, 2006; 155(1): 27 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
M Niedziela
Pathogenesis, diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules in children.
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2006; 13(2): 427 - 453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
S. R. Steele, M. J. Martin, P. S. Mullenix, K. S. Azarow, and C. A. Andersen
The Significance of Incidental Thyroid Abnormalities Identified During Carotid Duplex Ultrasonography
Arch Surg, October 1, 2005; 140(10): 981 - 985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Lyshchik, V. Drozd, Y. Demidchik, and C. Reiners
Diagnosis of Thyroid Cancer in Children: Value of Gray-Scale and Power Doppler US
Radiology, May 1, 2005; 235(2): 604 - 613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
J. R. Wienke, W. K. Chong, J. R. Fielding, K. H. Zou, and C. A. Mittelstaedt
Sonographic Features of Benign Thyroid Nodules: Interobserver Reliability and Overlap With Malignancy
J. Ultrasound Med., October 1, 2003; 22(10): 1027 - 1031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
L. Hegedus, S. J. Bonnema, and F. N. Bennedbaek
Management of Simple Nodular Goiter: Current Status and Future Perspectives
Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2003; 24(1): 102 - 132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
E. K. Alexander, J. P. Heering, C. B. Benson, M. C. Frates, P. M. Doubilet, E. S. Cibas, and E. Marqusee
Assessment of Nondiagnostic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspirations of Thyroid Nodules
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2002; 87(11): 4924 - 4927.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
D. S. Ross
Nonpalpable Thyroid Nodules--Managing an Epidemic
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2002; 87(5): 1938 - 1940.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
E. Papini, R. Guglielmi, A. Bianchini, A. Crescenzi, S. Taccogna, F. Nardi, C. Panunzi, R. Rinaldi, V. Toscano, and C. M. Pacella
Risk of Malignancy in Nonpalpable Thyroid Nodules: Predictive Value of Ultrasound and Color-Doppler Features
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2002; 87(5): 1941 - 1946.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Corrias, S. Einaudi, E. Chiorboli, G. Weber, A. Crino, M. Andreo, G. Cesaretti, L. de Sanctis, M. F. Messina, M. Segni, et al.
Accuracy of Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy of Thyroid Nodules in Detecting Malignancy in Childhood: Comparison with Conventional Clinical, Laboratory, and Imaging Approaches
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2001; 86(10): 4644 - 4648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. H. Samuels
Editorial: Evaluation and Treatment of Sporadic Nontoxic Goiter--Some Answers and More Questions
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2001; 86(3): 994 - 997.
[Full Text]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
E. Marqusee, C. B. Benson, M. C. Frates, P. M. Doubilet, P. R. Larsen, E. S. Cibas, and S. J. Mandel
Usefulness of Ultrasonography in the Management of Nodular Thyroid Disease
Ann Intern Med, November 7, 2000; 133(9): 696 - 700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leenhardt, L.
Right arrow Articles by Aurengo, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leenhardt, L.
Right arrow Articles by Aurengo, A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals