| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Original Studies |
Department of Internal Medicine, Divisions of Endocrinology (S.T.A.) and Nephrology (A.B.), American University Hospital-Medical Center and Chronic Care Center for Diabetes, New York, New York 10022
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Sami T. Azar, M.D., F.A.C.P., Division of Endocrinology, American University Hospital, 850 3rd Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, New York 10022.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
IDDM and elevated blood pressure have been found to be associated in several clinical studies, and hyperinsulinemia was believed to be the cause of the hypertension (11, 12, 13, 14, 15). However, some studies have demonstrated that the apparent correlation between hyperinsulinemia and elevated blood pressure was actually nonsignificant. Peters et al. (16) have shown that type 1 diabetic patients may suffer from nocturnal elevation in blood pressure and that this elevation is not related to hyperinsulinemia but to high serum catecholamines. The Diabetes Control and Complication Trial Research Group study concluded that tight diabetes control with intensive insulin treatment (more than three injections per day) reduced the incidence of most complications of diabetes (1), and in its primary prevention cohort, it showed a slightly higher daytime systolic blood pressure in the intensively treated group (17).
We hypothesize that tight diabetes control, which may be accompanied by subclinical nocturnal hypoglycemias and a high serum catecholamine level, may result in a rise in nocturnal blood pressure in type 1 diabetics on intensive insulin therapy. We studied 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (AMBP) in nonobese normoalbuminuric IDDM patients treated with the twice a day conventional insulin therapy (CIT) and those treated with intensive insulin therapy (IIT).
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A total of 36 IDDM patients were studied. Eighteen
patients were treated with intensive insulin therapy (multiple daily
injections) for at least 6 months, and 18 patients were treated with
conventional insulin regimens (twice daily injections of regular and
intermediate acting insulin) for at least 6 months. They were eligible
for study if their disease duration was more than 1 yr, they were not
hypertensive (morning blood pressure <130 mm Hg systolic and <80 mm
Hg diastolic), they had no symptoms or physical signs of autonomic
neuropathy, they were receiving no medications other than insulin, and
they had no acute illness. The clinical characteristics of the patients
are shown in Table 1
. All subjects gave
consent to the study.
|
All patients had an AMBP recorded over a period of 24 h. AMBP was recorded at 30-min intervals from 09000900 h by means of an oscillometric AMBP recorder (SPACELABS 90202, Redmond, WA). Daytime and nighttime blood pressures were computed. Daytime included values between 06002200 h. Nighttime included values between 22000600 h.
All patients followed their usual insulin regimen. Blood glucose levels were determined four times during the 24-h AMBP (before each meal and at bedtime). None of the patients had symptoms suggestive of hypoglycemia or had a blood glucose level lower than 50 mg/dL during the 24-h AMBP.
Statistical analysis
Data are reported as the mean ± SD. Scheffes multiple comparison test was used for analysis. P < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. The sample size of our study was sufficiently large to detect a 6-mm Hg difference in blood pressure at a power of 0.8.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Hemoglobin A1c was lower in the IIT group compared
with the CIT group (8.1 ± 1.2% vs. 11.0 ±
3.2%). The amount of insulin per body weight (units per kg) was higher
in the IIT group than in the CIT group (1.0 ± 0.2 vs.
0.7 ± 0.2 U/kg). The frequency of reported weekly hypoglycemias
was significantly higher in the ITT group than in the CIT group
(3.0 ± 1.8 vs. 0.7 ± 0.8; P <
0.01; Table 2
).
|
The nocturnal diastolic blood pressure was higher in the IIT group
(66 ± 9 mm Hg) than in the CIT group (55 ± 4 mm Hg). The
nocturnal systolic blood pressure was not significantly higher in the
IIT group. The nocturnal decline in both systolic and diastolic blood
pressure was lower in IIT group (7 ± 5 and 6 ± 4 mm Hg,
respectively) than that in the CIT group (13 ± 6 and 16 ± 6
mm Hg, respectively). The nocturnal mean arterial blood pressure was
also higher in the IIT group compared with the CIT group (82 ± 11
vs. 72 ± 5). The nocturnal heart rate was higher in
IIT group compared with CIT group (81 ± 12 vs. 67
± 9/min). The daytime systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood
pressure, and heart rate were similar in both groups (Table 3
).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In normal individuals, one of the important findings of AMBP is the pronounced diurnal rhythm. Blood pressure tends to be higher in the morning, lower at night, and at its nadir during sleep, when there is more than a 10% dip in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure. A blunted nocturnal decline in arterial blood pressure has been demonstrated both in type 1 (18, 19) and type 2 diabetes (20). However, this is the first report that looks at the behavior of the diurnal changes in blood pressure in the type 1 diabetics receiving IIT compared with those in the type 1 diabetics receiving CIT. In nondiabetic subjects, the lack of nocturnal dip of blood pressure is associated with left ventricular hypertrophy (21, 22), enhanced cardiovascular complications, and retinopathy (22, 23). Hypertensive patients lacking this decline are also at increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity (24). This indicates that a diminished nocturnal fall in blood pressure in type 1 diabetics receiving intensive insulin therapy is a critical clinical finding. Previous studies established not only a blunted nocturnal blood pressure decline (18, 19), but also AMBP elevations during the day in normoalbuminuric type 1 diabetics (25). In this study we did not find any statistical difference in the daytime blood pressure between the two groups, which implies that the lack of the nocturnal dip in blood pressure may be independent of an overall tendency toward hypertension in these patients. These changes in AMBP seem to be consistent and reproducible with minimal intraindividual variability (19, 21, 22, 24). For instance, four of our patients had a repeat 24-h AMBP with essentially no change in daytime and nighttime BP readings.
Obesity is a known independent risk factor for hypertension in diabetic and nondiabetic patients of all ages (26, 27, 28, 29, 30). In our study, the two groups of patients were matched with respect to body mass index. Multivariate analysis revealed no correlation between the daytime blood pressure or nocturnal blood pressure and the body mass index.
One may speculate that in the IIT group, with or without a relative state of nocturnal hyperinsulinemia, a relative state of hypoglycemia could have occurred that resulted in alterations of sleep and consequently affected the nocturnal blood pressure. However, this possibility is unlikely because none of the patients in either group reported being awakened by hypoglycemia or by any other event during the night of AMBP. In this study, a relationship between the nocturnal drop in blood glucose and the nocturnal drop in blood pressure was not assessed, as this would have involved blood glucose monitoring during sleeping hours, which could have awakened the patients and subsequently altered the blood pressure determination.
A recent study demonstrated a higher nocturnal blood pressure in NIDDM patients with microalbuminuria (31). However, in our study, there was no significant difference in the amount of 24-h microalbuminuria in both groups of patients.
Many studies have demonstrated that the apparent correlation between hyperinsulinemia and elevated blood pressure was actually nonsignificant. Peters et al. (16) have shown that this elevation in nocturnal blood pressure is not related to hyperinsulinemia but, rather, to high serum catecholamines. Moreover, several studies emerged, challenging the hypothesis of hyperinsulinemia as an independent risk factor for hypertension. Data from a population-based study in Pima Indians do not support a major role for insulin in determining the occurrence of hypertension or the regulation of blood pressure (30). Another strong evidence against a role of insulin in hypertension is made by a population-based study in the Pacific (26). A further argument against the role of insulin comes from data of insulinoma patients (32, 33). Like insulinoma patients and unlike type 2 diabetics, type 1 diabetics have hyperinsulinemia that is not primarily caused by an underlying state of insulin resistance (34, 35). We believe that at this stage the hyperinsulinemia-hypertension hypothesis is not yet confirmed.
Finally, we speculate that with or without a relative state of nocturnal hyperinsulinemia in the IIT group, a relative state of hypoglycemia may occur that results in a relative hypercatecholaminic state. This nocturnal rise in catecholamine levels may be the cause of this alteration in nocturnal blood pressure. The fact that both a higher nocturnal blood pressure and a higher nocturnal heart rate are present in the IIT group speaks for a higher nocturnal catecholamine level in this group of patients compared with that in the CIT group of patients. Several studies have been reported on catecholamine levels in diabetics. Del Rio et al. (36, 37) found increased 24-h urinary epinephrine in patients with uncomplicated IDDM. They proposed that adrenomedullary hyperactivity may be a compensatory reaction to a blunted norepinephrine response to stimuli that normally increase sympathetic outflow. Zadic et al. (38) showed increased catecholamine concentrations in the 24-h plasma pool of IDDM patients without diabetic complications. Nevertheless, all of these findings need further metabolic studies to explain them.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received January 26, 1998.
Revised May 22, 1998.
Accepted June 1, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ichmitz A, Pedersen M, Hansen K. 1991 Blood pressure by 24h ambulatory recordings in type 2 diabetics.
Relationship to urinary albumin excretion. Diabete Metab. 17:301307.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. A. Miller, J. R. Curtis, and E. B. Sochett Relationship Between Diurnal Blood Pressure, Renal Hemodynamic Function, and the Renin-Angiotensin System in Type 1 Diabetes Diabetes, July 1, 2003; 52(7): 1806 - 1811. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Silverstein and J. I. Malone Strict Glycemic Control Is Necessary But Not Practical in Most Children with Type 1 Diabetes J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2000; 85(2): 518 - 522. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. L. Poulsen, K. W. Hansen, E. Ebbehøj, S. T. Knudsen, and C. E. Mogensen No Deleterious Effects of Tight Blood Glucose Control on 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Normoalbuminuric Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus Patients J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2000; 85(1): 155 - 158. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |