| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Original Studies |
Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Ralf-Michael Frieboes, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Kraepelinstrasse 10, D-80804 Munich/Germany. E-mail: frieboes{at}mpipsykl.mpg.de
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous investigationseither under baseline conditions or after
induced changes of PRL secretion levelsremain equivocal about an
interaction of PRL secretion and the sleep EEG. In 1974, a relationship
between PRL secretion and the non-REM-REM cycle in humans was reported,
with PRL nadirs during REM periods and rising PRL levels during non-REM
periods being described (11). Recently, by using EEG spectral analysis,
a temporal relationship between
waves and PRL secretion was found
in young human subjects (12). Furthermore, systemic short-term
administration of PRL stimulated REM sleep in intact animals (for
review see Ref. 13), as well as in pontine cats after hypophysectomy
(14), but antiserum to PRL decreased REM sleep in rats (15). In all
these studies non-REM sleep, including SWS, remained unchanged (14, 15). Long-term hyperprolactinemia in rats that were grafted with a
PRL-secreting tumor (SMtTW2) under the kidney capsule, resulted in an
increase in nocturnal REM sleep duration, but a progressive decrease in
REM sleep during the day; again SWS remained unchanged (16). In another
experiment in adult rats bearing juvenile rat anterior pituitary grafts
under the capsule of the kidney, a large increase in REM sleep and, in
addition, enhanced duration of non-REM sleep with a trend to increased
wave activity in spectral analysis has been described (17). In
contrast to the latter study, in genetically hypoprolactinemic rats SWS
enhancement and REM sleep suppression in sleep-waking registration has
been reported (18). Taken together, these data support the hypothesis
that there is an association between sleep parameters and PRL levels,
either as a correlation between sleep-EEG parameters and nocturnal PRL
secretion (11, 12), or as a direct promotion of sleep, particularly of
REM sleep, by administration of PRL (13, 17).
On the other hand, the positive correlation between sleep cycles and plasma PRL concentrations was not confirmed by a study by van Cauter et al. (19). Instead, Wehr et al. (20) investigated circadian influences of sleep-wake and light-dark cycles on PRL secretion, and suggested that the nocturnal rise in PRL secretion is not sleep associated, but rather that it is rest dependent. In another study, the PRL secretory rate was enhanced during the whole sleep period independent of sleep quality, and experimentally impaired sleep did not influence PRL secretion in normal humans (21). Furthermore, in the recovery night following total sleep deprivation there was a distinct increase in PRL levels in young (22) and elderly subjects (23). In the latter study, Murck et al. (23) found that PRL secretion was by trend greater in older than in younger controls, whereas SWS was stimulated less in the elderly compared with young controls. The authors suggested that there might be a common mechanism for stimulation of PRL and sleep, but no causal relationship between the two factors. Because there are no studies examining long-term effects of increased PRL levels on sleep EEG in humans, the sleep-EEG investigation in patients with prolactinoma seemed to be a suitable instrument to study the relationship between excessively enhanced PRL levels and sleep in humans.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Seven outpatients, four women and three men, aged 2448 yr
(mean 32.1 ± 9.7 SD), were investigated in the sleep
laboratory after informed consent had been obtained and after
examination in the neuroendocrinological outpatient clinic of the Max
Planck Institute of Psychiatry for evaluation of prolactinoma. At
initial evaluation, the patients met the criteria for prolactinoma in
hormone measurement and in magnetic resonance imaging of the sella
region. PRL blood plasma levels were measured in the morning hours
(between 0800 and 1000 h) and were between 146 and 5106 ng/mL
(mean ± SD: 1450 ± 1810 ng/mL, normal range
125 ng/mL). Two patients had microprolactinoma (<10 mm) and five had
macroprolactinoma (>10 mm): the demographic data are given in Table 1
. Other possible etiologies of
hyperprolactinemia beside a prolactinoma were ruled out. The patients
had not been treated with drugs for at least 3 weeks before inclusion
in the study and had never received dopamine-agonistic substances such
as bromocriptine. Female patients using hormonal contraception were
excluded from the study. All patients had a secondary hypogonadism
accompanied by decreased testosterone/oestrogen and LH/FSH plasma
levels, but they had no other endocrine abnormalities, in particular no
alterations in insulin growth factor-I, TSH, free thyroid hormones, and
cortisol. Their body mass index was within the normal range.
Psychiatric diseases and especially symptoms of affective disorders
were ruled out. The study control group consisted of sex- and
age-matched (mean 32.7 ± 19.5 yr) healthy volunteers who were
admitted to the trial after passing a rigid psychiatric, physical, and
laboratory medical examination. In patients and controls, factors that
could cause ambiguous results such as specific sleep disorders, shift
work, or transmeridian flights in the last 3 months were all
excluded.
|
The sleep examination extended over two nights: The first night
served as adaptation to the laboratory setting including fixation of
EEG electrodes. Patients and probands were allowed to sleep between
2300 and 0700 h. During the second night the sleep EEG was
recorded. In the room adjacent to the laboratory, the patients could be
observed on a television screen, and polygraphic recordings (EEG,
electrooculogram, electromyogram, and electrocardiogram) were monitored
between 2300 and 0700 h. The patients were not allowed to sleep
before lights off at 2300. Sleep-EEG recordings were scored
manually using standard guidelines as previously described (24, 25).
Beside the time spent in the different sleep stages (wakefulness,
stages 14 sleep, and REM sleep), recorded with reference to sleep
period time (lasting from sleep onset to final awakening), calculations
of sleep parameters included total sleep time, sleep onset latency
(time between lights off and the first occurrence of stage 2 sleep),
REM latency (time span between sleep onset and first epoch containing
REM sleep), and REM density (ratio of 3-sec mini-epochs per REM period,
including at least one REM, to the total number of all 3-sec
mini-epochs per REM period). For all investigated sleep variables,
group values were expressed as mean ± SD. Variables
of primary interest, differences between the controls and the
patients stage 2 sleep, SWS, and REM sleep, were tested for
significance with multivariate ANOVA (MANOVA), with
= 0.05 as a
nominal level of significance. To test the influence of aging, which
has an effect on sleep-EEG parameters per se (26),
correlations between changes in sleep variables and age were
calculated. Additionally, correlations between sleep-EEG variables and
plasma PRL levels were computed. All correlations were calculated by
Pearsons correlation coefficients. To keep the type I error less or
equal to 0.05 all posteriori tests about significance of the
correlation coefficients were performed at a reduced level of
significance (Bonferroni correction).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
wave activity enhancement in addition to the
increase of REM sleep in rats with chronic hyperprolactinemia. On the
other hand, in chronically hypoprolactinemic rats, SWS was also
increased (18). In general, sleep-EEG investigations in rats and humans have to be compared with caution, because in rats sleep is usually distributed over the day in fragmented episodes, whereas the sleep habits of patients and controls in our study only consisted of one continuous episode during the night. Nevertheless, on the assumption that there are comparable mechanisms of sleep regulation in all mammals including humans, the differences between our study results and previous research may be explained by dose-dependent influences of PRL on the sleep EEG and different durations of hyperprolactinemia.
Concerning dose dependency, PRL in human as well as in rat serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is directly correlated (28, 29), and a receptor-mediated mechanism for the transport of PRL from blood to CSF in epithelial cells of the choroid plexus has been shown (30). In rats, the CSF PRL is maintained within 2% of serum PRL levels in young female animals but within 31% in aged, constantly estrous animals (31). Therefore it can be suggested that in those investigations in rabbits and rats in which PRL was peripherally administered, central PRL concentrations were enhanced up to 2-fold according to the increase of PRL plasma levels (14, 27). For example, the mean plasma PRL concentrations in rats bearing anterior pituitary grafts were 9 ng/mL in the morning and 11 ng/mL in the evening in contrast to 2 and 6 ng/mL in the controls (17). In our study, the mean plasma PRL concentrations in the patients in the early morning were 1450 ng/mL (normal range up to 25 ng/mL), probably accompanied with a more than 20-fold CSF PRL increase. Within the limitations of the suggestion that animal and human data about sleep regulation are comparable, these differences could lead to a hypothesis of dose-dependent effects of central PRL concentrations. Sleep-promoting effects of central PRL in humans, as in animals, may be mediated by locus coeruleus (LC) neuronal activity. Rat LC neurons, in which PRL-like immunoreactivity has been found (32), and which are involved in sleep-wake cycle regulation, showed significantly different discharge rates for consecutive wake and sleep stages, in decreasing order: active waking, quiet waking, light sleep, SWS, REM sleep (33). These results lead to the hypothesis that in the LC, cellular activities during SWS and REM sleep are closely related. Therefore, we suggest that both of these sleep stages with hyperpolarized cell activity can, in general, be promoted by PRL. This suggestion supports the assumption that there is a direct association between central PRL levels and sleep-EEG parameters. In all of our patients the central PRL levels may have passed the level of SWS stimulation, and there was no additional correlation between plasma PRL levels and the amount of SWS within the group.
Beside the PRL CSF level, the duration of enhanced PRL concentrations before sleep-EEG investigation seems to play an important role. It is well known that there are differences between acute and chronic influences of hormones on the sleep EEG. Acutely administered cortisol, for example, enhances non-REM sleep and increases SWS in controls (34, 35, 36, 37), whereas patients with chronic hypercortisolism show a reduction of non-REM sleep (4, 5). Interestingly, the only investigation in rats, in which there are effects on the sleep EEG with significant increases of both REM and non-REM sleep, was that with 47 weeks of chronic hyperprolactinemia after anterior pituitary grafts implantation (17). Increased PRL concentrations may cause a rapid onset of REM sleep stimulation and a delayed onset of SWS effects. Therefore, after an increase of the PRL secretion with concomitant central PRL enhancement in humans, for example because of drug influences, a moderate PRL stimulation may lead to an increase in REM sleep, whereas under long-term excessive CSF PRL levels, SWS may be stimulated.
There are two major, opposite-regulating factors of PRL release (38) that have influences on sleep EEG themselves: vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and dopamine (DA). Although excessive PRL levels may modulate their activity, it appears unlikely that VIP or DA, or both play an important role in the sleep-EEG changes in our study. After VIP administration in rats, increases of REM and non-REM sleep were observed, which were suggested to be mediated by PRL (39, 40). In young human control subjects, however, a prolongation of REM- and non-REM periods and an advanced occurrence of the cortisol nadir were found after repetitive administration of VIP (41). These changes are compatible with a phase-advance of sleep-endocrine activity. Because the PRL levels were only slightly, though significantly (about 1.5-fold) elevated in that study, it appears more likely that these effects reflect an action of VIP at the suprachiasmatic nucleus (41). Because no changes in the duration of non-REM and REM periods were detectable in our present study, a major impact of VIP appears unlikely. Concerning DA, there is good evidence that this substance specifically promotes REM sleep. Thus, L-dopa restores REM sleep in the reserpinized cat (42). Gammahydroxybutyrate induces REM sleep in male cats even after inhibition of serotonin synthesis by parachloro-phenylalanine, and it has been suggested that this effect is mediated by DA (43). The DA analogue 3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-N-n-propylpiperidine (3-PPP) also increases REM sleep and the mean duration of REM episodes in the rat, acting probably as an antagonist at postsynaptic receptors (44). In our study REM sleep remained unchanged, and therefore DA modulation appears not to be involved in the SWS stimulation under long-term hyperprolactinemia. It also seems unlikely that the secondary hypogonadism of the patients contributed to the sleep-EEG alterations. Administration of sexual steroids has effects on sleep regulation (45, 46), but the hypogonadism in our sample should result in a deterioration of sleep continuity and not in an improvement of deep sleep.
Interestingly, the changes in sleep are expressed more in the younger than in the older patients, as a negative correlation between age and SWS exists (26, 47, 48). Obviously, hyperprolactinemia stimulates SWS more potently in the younger patients than in the older ones, and thus the physiologically high amount of SWS in the young subjects is further enhanced under the pathological conditions. This finding has some similarities to the greater ability of GHRH and cortisol to stimulate non-REM sleep in young (36, 49) compared with older controls (34, 50). We suggest that the sleep-promoting efficacy of some hormones declines during aging independent of physiological concentrations of the substance in the elderly. Whereas GHRH secretion decreases during aging, other non-REM sleep-promoting hormones, namely cortisol and PRL concentrations (47, 51) remain unchanged or even increase.
Our results are in agreement with subjective reports of good sleep quality in patients with prolactinoma (38, 52). Whereas patients with other endocrine diseases often suffer from sleep complaints, patients with prolactinoma do not. Patients with acromegalia and Cushings disease and even patients with hypothyroidism often develop sleep disturbances with a reduction of non-REM sleep (4, 5, 6, 8). Whether patients with prolactinoma sleep objectively well has not been investigated until now. Within the limitations of the small study group, and hence a statistical analysis of only three variables (non-REM stage 2, SWS, and REM sleep) this investigation was able to show that patients with prolactinoma do not suffer from sleep impairments. Further studies using spectral analysis need to amplify the results in a longitudinal comparison of hyperprolactinemic patients before and under treatment. PRL, at least when greatly elevated, seems to improve and not to disturb sleep.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received February 9, 1998.
Revised April 27, 1998.
Accepted May 5, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. A. van der Klaauw, O. M. Dekkers, A. M. Pereira, K. W. van Kralingen, and J. A. Romijn Increased Daytime Somnolence despite Normal Sleep Patterns in Patients Treated for Nonfunctioning Pituitary Macroadenoma J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2007; 92(10): 3898 - 3903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Obal Jr, F. Garcia-Garcia, B. Kacsoh, P. Taishi, S. Bohnet, N. D. Horseman, and J. M. Krueger Rapid Eye Movement Sleep Is Reduced in Prolactin-Deficient Mice J. Neurosci., November 2, 2005; 25(44): 10282 - 10289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Weikel, A. Wichniak, M. Ising, H. Brunner, E. Friess, K. Held, S. Mathias, D. A. Schmid, M. Uhr, and A. Steiger Ghrelin promotes slow-wave sleep in humans Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, February 1, 2003; 284(2): E407 - E415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |