| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Original Studies |
Departments of Medicine (E.S.K, J.P.B.) and Pharmacology (J.P.B.), College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032; Queen Elizabeth Hospital (F.K.W.C.), Hong Kong; and St. Joseph Hospital (C.J.R.), Bangor, Maine 04401
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: John P. Bilezikian, Department of Medicine, College of Physicians and Sur-geons, 630 West 168th Street, New York, New York 10032.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To stimulate GH secretion, we chose two agonists that act by different mechanisms (11). Arginine infusion inhibits somatostatin, leading to GH release (12). L-Dopa directly stimulates GHRH release (13). These two agents administered sequentially constitute a potent challenge of GH responsiveness.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Fourteen men between the ages of 31 and 68 yr (mean age, 52.1 ± 3.2 yr) were studied, a subset of a larger, previously described, and well-characterized group of 24 patients with idiopathic osteoporosis (4). Although all patients were asked to undergo GH testing, only 14 chose to do so; no patients were intentionally excluded. There were no clinical, biochemical, or densitometric differences between those who underwent GH testing and those who did not. No patient had a history of thyroid dysfunction, glucocorticoid or anticonvulsant use, diabetes mellitus, gastrointestinal disease, gastrointestinal surgery, malignancy, or any other known metabolic bone disease. No patient had a history of alcoholism. Mean lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) was 0.723 g/cm2, T score -3.5; femoral neck BMD was 0.642 g/cm2, T score -3.07; and distal 1/3 radius BMD was 0.708 g/cm2, T score -2.05. Nine patients had a history of fracture. There was no history of childhood GH deficiency or growth disturbance, no history of delayed puberty, and no history of pituitary disease or deficiency. Eleven of the 14 men had reductions in serum IGF-I of greater than 0.5 SD below expected values for their age, though 3 of the 14 patients had normal serum IGF-I values for age.
This study was conducted with the approval of the Institutional Review Board of Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center. All subjects gave written informed consent.
GH provocative testing
GH was stimulated with iv arginine (30 g) infused via metered pump over 30 min, followed 1 h later by oral L-dopa (500 mg). One patient was tested only with arginine at the request of his physician. Studies were performed in the morning after an overnight fast. GH was sampled at time (t) -15, 0, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 min. IGF-I and IGF binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) were measured at baseline and at the conclusion of the study (t = 180 min).
Assays
Routine serum and urine biochemical measurements were made using standard techniques. GH was measured by RIA (14) and expressed in nanograms per milliliter. Samples for IGF-I were prepared first by acid-ethanol cryoprecipitation according to the method of Breier et al. (15) and then analyzed by RIA using a polyclonal antibody supplied by Nichols Institute (San Juan Capistrano, CA). Reference values for serum IGF-I levels over the four decades of ages included in our cohort were generated as previously described (4). All samples were batched and assayed at the same time. The intraassay coefficient of variation was 1.34%. The lower detection limit of the assay was 10 ng/mL. Serum IGFBP-3 concentration was measured using an immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) (Diagnostic Systems Labs., Webster, TX) in a single assay, with an intraassay coefficient of variation of 1.0%. The lower level of detection in this assay is 250 ng/mL. Total testosterone was measured by RIA (16). TSH was measured by a highly sensitive microparticle enzyme immunoassay (17). PRL was measured by RIA (18). Urinary free cortisol was measured by an initial extraction step followed by RIA (19). GH binding protein (GHBP) was measured by ligand-mediated immunofunctional assay (20) performed by Nichols Institute.
IGF-I Z score
Z scores for IGF-I were developed from laboratory reference ranges by decade of age. Reference values for serum IGF-I levels over the four decades of ages included in our cohort were generated by serum measurements performed on 200 normal men who participated in previous investigations. Serum IGF-I levels for this reference group were measured using the same extraction technique and the same polyclonal IGF-I antibody (21). Those reference values were nearly identical to concentrations of serum IGF-I by decade reported by the manufacturer for this RIA.
BMD
BMD of the lumbar spine, right femoral neck, and nondominant forearm was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry using a QDR-1000 bone densitometer (Hologic, Waltham, MA).
Statistical analysis
Results are reported as the mean ± SEM, with
the exception of serum IGF-I, which is presented ± SD
(Table 1
). Simple linear regression
analysis was used to determine the contribution of age, body mass index
(BMI), serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3, and the age-adjusted IGF-I Z score to
GHBP and GH. GH quantification, expressed as an area under the curve,
was calculated by the method of rectangles for the 3-h testing period.
Statistical analyses were performed with the Statview, (Abacus
Concepts, Inc., Berkeley, CA) package.
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Peak GH responsiveness was defined as the highest level achieved by an
individual on either provocative test. Twelve of the 14 patients
responded maximally to arginine, with a mean peak value of 14.0 ±
2.8 ng/mL. The mean increase above baseline was 17.7 ± 2.8-fold
(Fig. 1
). Peak responses ranged from
4.637 ng/mL. Seven subjects achieved this peak at 60 min; 5 subjects
responded as early as 45 min after the onset of arginine infusion (Fig. 2
). Two patients responded with less than
a 3-fold increase to arginine, one with a mean baseline of 0.5 ng/mL
achieving a peak value of 1.4 ng/mL at 45 min, the other with a mean
baseline of 0.7 ng/mL achieving a peak GH of 1.6 ng/mL at 60 min. Both
patients clearly achieved satisfactory peak responses to
L-dopa, 13.3 ng/mL and 3.1 ng/mL, respectively.
|
|
For the entire 3 h of testing, the group of men produced an average of 5.6 ± 1.0 ng/mL per min of GH compared with the baseline of 0.8 ± 0.1 ng/mL per min. Total secretory output amounted to 1005.2 ± 173.4 ng/mL. To evaluate whether GH secretory capacity varied systematically with the IGF-I axis, IGF-I, IGFBP3 (pre- and posttest), and the age-adjusted IGF-I Z score (see Methods) were evaluated as predictors of the total 3-h GH secretory amount. No IGF-I index was related significantly to GH secretory capacity, and there was no difference in response between the 3 men with normal serum IGF-I levels and the 11 men with reduced serum values. Total testosterone concentration was also not related to GH secretory capacity. However there was a significant inverse relationship between BMI and GH output, r = -0.64, P < 0.04, as has been shown previously (23).
The mean serum IGF-I level at baseline was 159 ± 50 ng/mL. There was no significant change in serum IGF-I concentration when measured at the end of the study with a mean value at t = 180 of 148.1 ± 42.8 ng/mL. Similarly, there was no significant change in IGFBP-3 concentration after GH testing, with a mean value at t = 180 of 2553 ± 143 µg/L (baseline = 2752 ± 146 µg/L).
Mean GHBP was 214.7 ± 38.0 pmol/L (range 59513 pmol/L), similar to the reported normal value, 222.6 ± 30.8 pmol/L (range 89.8534.0 pmol/L) (22). No correlation was found between age, serum IGF-I, IGFBP-3 values, or serum testosterone levels. In addition, there was no correlation between GHBP and BMI.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Peak responses of GH to arginine infusion were comparable with the results of Baum et al. (22) in a similarly sized group of 17 healthy men whose mean age and BMI, 51 ± 3 yr and 25.1 ± 0.7, respectively, were virtually identical to our patients. Baum et al. reported a peak GH response to arginine of 6.1 ± 1.2 ng/mL, whereas our subjects showed an increase to 14 ± 2.8 ng/mL. The magnitude of our patients responseabout twice that of Baums groupis likely to be because of their use of an IRMA (Hybritech, San Diego, CA) to measure GH, whereas we used an RIA. Values for GH obtained by RIA are approximately twice those obtained by IRMA (29, 30), an observation that places the data of Baum et al. in line with the data reported here. The number of patients responding to arginine in our study is similar to the expected response to this agent (13, 31).
Two issues must be considered when testing GH secretory response in the adult. The first is that GH responsiveness declines with age so that the diagnostic criteria used to define GH deficiency differ between adults and children. The published studies, in the aggregate, favor 10 mU/L (5 ng/mL) as a reasonable value for a stimulated criterion in men less than 50 yr old. This is half the value of 20 mU/L (10 ng/mL) established for children (11). These criteria are best established for the insulin tolerance test (ITT). The second consideration is the provocative test utilized. Although the ITT to induce hypoglycemia is preferred for provocative testing in the adult (27, 32, 33), arginine and L-dopa, alternative choices for GH stimulation that we used in our study, do not carry with them the risks of insulin-induced hypoglycemia in a middle-aged male population. Rahim et al. (31) have compared the peak GH response to insulin with the responses to other pharmacological agents including arginine, glucagon, and clonidine in healthy young adult males. The results of their study demonstrate that peak GH responses achieved to these other agents are significantly lower than peak response to insulin. Our patients comfortably met the expected target for GH responsiveness using arginine and L-dopa. It seems reasonable to conclude, therefore, that the provocative tests of GH reserve in our study adequately demonstrate that these subjects are normal in this regard.
GH can also be studied under physiological conditions using 10- to 20-min sampling protocols to determine circadian dynamics, pulsatility, and integrated GH quantification. Two recently published studies of severely affected GH-deficient adults compared measures of 24-h GH secretion between patients and normal controls (22, 34). There was overlap in nearly all parameters evaluated, although spontaneous peak GH levels discriminated between the groups (34). It is of interest that there was a very strong correlation between spontaneous peak GH levels and peak levels achieved by provocation (ITT). Toogood et al. (35) demonstrated a similar strong correlation between mean GH output in a 24-h period and peak GH response to arginine. These findings indicate that GH provocative testing can effectively assess the GH axis, and in many ways does reflect endogenous GH production.
Our observations illustrate an important point about relationships between GH and IGF-I in adults. Whereas in children, measurements of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 are useful in assessment of GH deficiency (33, 36), these measurements are of lesser value in the adult (35). In fact, Hoffman et al. (32) have shown great overlap in IGF-I levels when normal and GH-deficient adults are compared with each other. Thus, when IGF-I levels in the adult are reduced below age- and sex-matched controls, it is possible, as shown here, that etiologies other than GH deficiency are responsible.
Our data would seem to suggest that abnormalities other than those related to GH are more likely to account for the reduced IGF-I levels we observed in our patients. The challenge presented by the results of this investigation is to elucidate the identity of those other factors that could be responsible for reduced IGF-I levels in men with idiopathic osteoporosis. Agents that help to regulate IGF-I levels in the skeleton are attractive to consider because after the liver, the skeleton is the second major reservoir for circulating IGF-I (24). Reduced local concentrations of IGF-I in the skeleton could be responsible for the reduced circulating levels of IGF-I and for the characteristically low rates of bone turnover that have been observed in men with idiopathic osteoporosis. In this regard, PTH is a local regulator of IGF-I production, and could become recognized as an important factor in the pathogenesis of this syndrome. Alternatively, abnormalities in other regulators that control local IGF-I production such as gonadal steroids, dehydroepiandrosterone, interleukin-I, or platelet-derived growth factor could become attractive to consider as an explanation for IGF-I deficiency in these men.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received December 10, 1997.
Revised March 18, 1998.
Accepted April 8, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Khosla, S. Amin, and E. Orwoll Osteoporosis in Men Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2008; 29(4): 441 - 464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Giovannucci, C. A. Haiman, E. A. Platz, S. E. Hankinson, M. N. Pollak, and D. J. Hunter Dinucleotide Repeat in the Insulin-like Growth Factor-I Gene Is Not Related to Risk of Colorectal Adenoma Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2002; 11(11): 1509 - 1510. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. S. Kurland, F. Cosman, D. J. McMahon, C. J. Rosen, R. Lindsay, and J. P. Bilezikian Parathyroid Hormone as a Therapy for Idiopathic Osteoporosis in Men: Effects on Bone Mineral Density and Bone Markers J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2000; 85(9): 3069 - 3076. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. Mora, P. Pitukcheewanont, J. C. Nelson, and V. Gilsanz Serum Levels of Insulin-Like Growth Factor I and the Density, Volume, and Cross-Sectional Area of Cortical Bone in Children J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 1999; 84(8): 2780 - 2783. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Rosen, E. S. Kurland, D. Vereault, R. A. Adler, P. J. Rackoff, W. Y. Craig, S. Witte, J. Rogers, and J. P. Bilezikian Association Between Serum Insulin Growth Factor-I (IGF-I) and a Simple Sequence Repeat in IGF-I Gene: Implications for Genetic Studies of Bone Mineral Density J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 1998; 83(7): 2286 - 2290. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |