help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Micic, D.
Right arrow Articles by Casanueva, F. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Micic, D.
Right arrow Articles by Casanueva, F. F.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 83, No. 7 2569-2572
Copyright © 1998 by The Endocrine Society


Original Studies

Preserved Growth Hormone (GH) Secretion in Aged and Very Old Subjects after Testing with the Combined Stimulus GH-Releasing Hormone plus GH-Releasing Hexapeptide-61

Dragan Micic, Vera Popovic, Mirjana Doknic, Djuro Macut, Carlos Dieguez and Felipe F. Casanueva

Institute of Endocrinology, University Clinical Centre (D.M., V.P., M.D., D.M.), Belgrade Yugoslavia Y-11000; and Department of Physiology (C.D.) and Medicine (F.F.C.), School of Medicine, Santiago de Compostela University, Santiago de Compostela, Spain E-15780

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: F. F. Casanueva, P.O. Box 563, Santiago de Compostela, Spain E-15780. E-mail: meffcasa{at}uscmail.usc.es


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Either spontaneous or pharmacological stimulated GH secretion is reduced with advanced age. This observation is an added difficulty for the biochemical diagnosis of GH deficiency in adults. Furthermore, the combined administration of saturating doses of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) plus GH-releasing hexapeptide (GHRP)-6 is nowadays the most effective GH-releasing stimulus tested in a variety of settings related to altered somatotroph function. To understand whether the GH discharge elicited by the combined stimulus declines with age, 26 normal subjects of both sexes, divided into 3 age groups [adults 19–40 yr; aged 46–65 yr; and very old (75–96 yr) subjects] were studied. They were administered iv, as bolus and in combination, 90 µg GHRH plus 90 µg GHRP-6.

In the three groups, the combined administration of GHRH plus GHRP-6 elicited a GH area under the curve (µg/L per 120 min) of 3,127 ± 262, 3,409 ± 573, and 4,655 ± 737 for adults, aged, and very old subjects, respectively (nonsignificant differences). The mean GH peak was 47.5 ± 4.5 µg/L for adults, 52.9 ± 8.4 µg/L for aged subjects, and 76.0 ± 11.7 for very old subjects (nonsignificant differences). Individually examined, there were no nonresponders to the combined stimulus, and all subjects (independently of age) showed a GH peak over 25 µg/L (the lowest peak was 27.3 µg/L, and the highest peak was 119.2 µg/L).

In conclusion, the GHRH plus GHRP-6-induced GH release is well preserved in aged and very old subjects, which suggests that the GH secretory capability of the combined test is not reduced by age. This combined test may be useful for the diagnosis of GH-deficient states in adults.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE BIOCHEMICAL diagnosis of GH deficiency in the adult patient is an awkward task (1, 2, 3), and it has even been questioned whether such a diagnosis is viable (4). Because the random measure of serum concentrations is worthless, because of the pulsatile nature of GH secretion, and because 24-h spontaneous GH secretion gives conflicting results, clinicians must rely on the pharmacological stimulation of the pituitary somatotroph to establish the diagnosis of a suspected deficient secretion of GH. Nowadays, the insulin tolerance test (ITT) may be considered the gold standard test for assessing GH deficiency in adults (5, 6) being the combination of arginine-GHRH (7), an excellent alternative when hypoglycemia is contraindicated (6). However, the side effects of ITT made compulsory the search for alternative provocative stimulus of GH secretion, reproducible, without side effects and with cut-off points that do not overlap between normal and pathological subjects. Furthermore, because, in aging and in obesity, there is a progressive decline in stimulated GH secretion (8, 9, 10), and because most suspected GH-deficient adults present an advanced age and some degree of adiposity, a test that is nonaffected by age or adiposity would be very useful.

GH-releasing hexapeptide (GHRP)-6, hexarelin, and other nonclassical GH-releasing peptides (11, 12, 13, 14) seem to be a new and promising tool for exploring GH secretory mechanisms in patients with suspected GH deficiency. In fact, GHRP-6, when administered alone, is a potent stimulus of somatotroph discharge in normal subjects. Moreover, the combined administration of GHRH plus GHRP-6 elicits a powerful GH discharge of potentiating characteristics, being probably the most potent GH stimulus known to date (15). The GH secretion elicited by the combined stimulus is similar for men and women, or normal children, and it is not affected by obesity (16, 17, 18).

In the present work, the GH secretion elicited by the administration of GHRH plus GHRP-6 was assessed among a group of aged and very old normal subjects and was compared with that elicited in normal adults as internal controls. The target of this study was to evaluate whether this combined stimulus would be affected by the age of the tested subjects.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Twenty-six normal healthy volunteers (16 women and 10 men), 53.5 ± 4.5 yr old (range 19–96 yr), participated in this study after providing informed consent. All of them had normal life styles, were taking no medication, and were within 10% of their ideal body weight. The study was approved by the Hospital Bioethical Committee. Testing subjects had been previously divided, according to age, into 3 groups: 1) adults, n = 10 (6 women, 4 men), 29.0 ± 1.9 yr old (range 19–40 yr), body mass index (BMI) = 25.3 ± 1.0; 2) aged subjects, n = 8 (4 women, 4 men), 56.5 ± 2.1 yr old (range 46–65 yr), BMI = 22.2 ± 0.9; and 3) very old subjects, n = 8 (5 women, 3 men), 81.3 ± 2.9 yr old (range 75–96 yr), BMI = 21.0 ± 1.5.

Tests started at 0800 h, after an overnight fast, with the subjects recumbent. An indwelling catheter was placed in a forearm vein and kept permeable with a slow infusion of 150 mmol/L NaCl. The first blood sample was obtained at -30 min; the GH stimulus was administered at 0 min, and additional blood samples were obtained at appropriate intervals. Women were tested in the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. As GH stimulant, it was administered the combined test of an iv bolus injection of 90 µg GHRH (GRF 1–29 NH2, Geref Serono Laboratories, Madrid, Spain), immediately followed by an iv bolus injection of GHRP-6 (His-DTrp-Ala-Trp-DPhe-Lys-NH2; Peninsula Laboratories, Madrid, Spain), prepared as previously described (see Ref. 25).

Serum GH concentrations were determined by using a time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay (Delfia, Wallac Oy, Turku, Finland) with a GH sensitivity of 0.02 µg/L and coefficients of variation of 6.3% (0.4 µg/L), 5.3% (10.2 µg/L), and 4.2% (43.4 µg/L). Hormone levels are presented and analyzed as absolute values or as the mean GH peak. The areas under the secretory curve (AUC) were calculated by a trapezoidal method and were compared between groups by the Wilcoxon rank test. The statistical level of significance was set at P < 0.05.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
As expected, the combined administration of GHRH, immediately followed by GHRP-6 (both at saturating doses), induced a clear-cut GH secretion in the three studied groups of subjects (Fig. 1Go), with a quite synchronized pattern of GH discharge. No differences were observed between men and women; therefore, values were pooled. The GHRH+GHRP-6-mediated mean GH peak was 47.5 ± 4.5 µg/L for adults, 52.9 ± 8.4 µg/L for aged subjects, and 76.0 ± 11.7 for very old subjects (Fig. 2Go). Compared with the adult group, no statistically significant differences were observed in either the aged or the very old group. Analyzed as area under the curve, the values in µg/L per 120 min were: 3,127 ± 262, 3,409 ± 573, and 4,655 ± 737 for adults, aged, and very old subjects, respectively, without statistical differences among the groups. Individually examined (Fig. 2Go), there were no nonresponders to the combined stimulus; and all subjects (independently of the age) showed a GH peak over 25 µg/L (the lowest peak being 27.3 µg/L; and the highest peak, 119.2 µg/L). The four higher GH peaks, in decreasing order, were observed in subjects who were 96, 77, 79, and 53 yr old. There was a positive correlation between the GHRH-GHRP-6-mediated GH response and age (r = 0.45, P < 0.01); how-ever, the r value was too low to consider the correlation of biological relevance.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Mean ± SE of plasma GH values after the administration iv of GHRH (90 µg) plus GHRP-6 (90 µg) at 0 min in three groups of healthy subjects with different age intervals: adults (19–40 yr), aged (46–65 yr), and very old subjects (75–96 yr).

 


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. A, Mean ± SE of the AUC (in µg/L per 120 min) and mean GH peak in three different groups of healthy subjects with different age intervals, after the administration of GHRH plus GHRP-6 at saturating doses; B, individual peaks after the same combined stimulus.

 
No side effects were reported in any of the tests.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The signs and symptoms of GH deficiency in adults are similar to those of normal aging, making the diagnosis of GH deficiency a cumbersome and uncertain task in adult patients (1). The diagnosis of GH deficiency must rely on biochemical determinations, and provocative or pharmacological tests have been the only validated means for such diagnosis (6). Furthermore, because either spontaneous or stimulated GH secretion is reduced with the advancing of age, a new degree of uncertainty is shown in the diagnostic process. In fact, all provocative stimuli of GH secretion (including hypoglycemia, GHRH and GHRP-6 or hexarelin) show a lower effectiveness when aging progresses (19, 20, 21, 22, 23). So, the availability of a provocative test not affected by aging should be clinically useful.

The new GH secretagogues, among which GHRP-6 is the most widely studied, may represent a new physiological system that participates in the regulation of GH secretion in man (11, 12, 13, 14), and these nonclassical secretagogues have been widely used in the last few years in the testing of the GH reserve in man (24, 25, 26). Although the mechanism of action is not fully understood, the combined administration of GHRH plus GHRP-6 (both at saturating dose) is nowadays considered the most potent stimulus of GH secretion in man (15), being able to restore the GH secretion in states associated with chronic blockade of somatotroph activity (as in obesity) (18). In the present work, the combined stimulus of GHRH-GHRP-6 has been studied in a group of very old subjects (age higher than 75 yr) showing no decline in the amount of GH secretion, as compared with both normal adults (less than 40 yr) and aged subjects (age 46–65 yr). A similar lack of age-related decline has been reported for normal subjects in their late adulthood (21). The GHRH-GHRP-6-mediated GH discharge was similar for the three groups of age, with similar mean GH peaks, AUC, and secretory pattern, which suggests a very synchronized type of secretion. However, the most interesting information came from the analysis of individual GH peaks. In fact, as Fig. 2Go shows, all the subjects had a positive response to the stimulus, an unusual fact when facing a GH provocative test. Moreover, despite the dispersion in GH peaks in any of the age groups, no subject responded with a GH peak under 25 µg/L, a cut-off far from the highest level of GH secretion elicited in patients with GH deficiency, studied with similar tests (26).

When considering the suitability of GHRH plus GHRP-6 as a first-choice stimulus for assessing GH reserve, it is worthy to consider that it elicits a near-normal GH discharge in obesity (18) in patients with hypothyroidism (27) and in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (28). All of them are confusing situations when facing an individual diagnosis of GH deficiency in adults. Another positive fact is that it is a safe stimulus, without side effects, and that it does not require medical supervision under its realization. The lack of age-related decline in the GHRH-GHRP-6-mediated GH release is an added value to this promising test, and this opens the possibility of using it as a therapeutical tool to revert some deleterious manifestations of aging in man, as has been showed with the nonpeptidil GH secretagogues (29). It seems then that the combined test may be used for the diagnosis of GH-deficient states in adults, because it is scarcely affected by age, obesity, sex steroid levels, and so on. Because the maximal amount of GH that a given individual is able to release upon stimulation must have relationship with the pituitary reserve of the hormone, and because GHRH plus a GHS is the most powerful stimulus, it may have a relevant diagnostic role in the future.

Considerable work with larger groups of either normal or GH-deficient subjects is needed before the diagnostic advantages of this test, in confrontation with the ITT and the arginine-GHRH, may be established.

In conclusion, the GHRH plus GHRP-6-induced GH release is preserved in aged and very old subjects, suggesting that the GH secretory capability of the combined test is not reduced by age. This combined test may be useful for the diagnosis of GH-deficient states in adults.


    Acknowledgments
 
The expert technical help of Ms. Mary Lage is gratefully acknowledged.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by research grants from: Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria, Spanish Ministry of Health and Conselleria de Educacion, Xunta de Galicia. Back

Received December 3, 1997.

Revised January 27, 1998.

Accepted February 3, 1998.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Casanueva FF. 1996 Diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in adulthood. Eur J Endocrinol. 135:168–170.[Medline]
  2. Cuneo RC, Salomon F, McGauley GA, Sonksen PH. 1989 The growth hormone deficiency syndrome in adults. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 37:387–397.
  3. Jorgensen JOL, Pedersen SA, Thuesen I, et al. 1989 Beneficial effects of growth hormone treatment in GH-deficient adults. Lancet 2:1221–1224.
  4. Rosenfeld RG. 1997 Editorial: is growth hormone deficiency a viable diagnosis?. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 82:349–351.[Free Full Text]
  5. Hoffman DM, O’Sullivan AJ, Baxter RC, Ho KKY. 1994 Diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in adults. Lancet. 343:1064–1068.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Growth Hormone Research Society. 1998 Consensus guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of adults with GH deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 83:379–381.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Arvat E, Gianotti L, Grottoli S, et al. 1994 Arginine and growth hormone-releasing hormone restore the blunted growth hormone-releasing activity of hexarelin in elderly subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 79:1440–1443.[Abstract]
  8. Casanueva FF. 1992 Physiology of growth hormone secretion and action. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 21:483–517.[Medline]
  9. Dieguez C, Casanueva FF. 1995 Influence of metabolic substrates and obesity on growth hormone secretion. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 6:55–59.
  10. Vance ML. 1993 Metabolic status and growth hormone secretion in man. J Paediatr Endocrinol. 6:3–4.
  11. Bowers CY, Momany FA, Chang D, Hong A, Chang K. 1980 Structure-activity relationships of a synthetic pentapeptide that specifically releases GH in vitro. Endocrinology. 106:663–667.[Medline]
  12. Bowers CY, Sartor AO, Reynolds GA, Badger TM. 1991 On the actions of the growth hormone-releasing hexapeptide, GHRP-6. Endocrinology. 128:2027–2035.[Abstract]
  13. Ghigo E, Arvat E, Muccioli G, Camanni F. 1997 Growth hormone-releasing peptides. Eur J Endocrinol. 136:445–460.[Abstract]
  14. Smith RG, Van der Ploeg LHT, Howard AD, et al. 1997 Peptidomimetic regulation of growth hormone secretion. Endocr Rev. 18:621–645.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Bowers CY, Reynolds GA, Durham D, Barrera CM, Pezzoli SS, Thorner MO. 1990 Growth hormone (GH)-releasing peptide stimulates GH release in normal men and acts synergistically with GH-releasing hormone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 70:975–982.[Abstract]
  16. Pombo M, Barreiro J, Peñalva A, Peino R, Dieguez C, Casanueva FF. 1995 Absence of growth hormone (GH) secretion after the administration of either GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), GH-releasing peptide (GHRP-6 or GHRH plus GHRP-6, in children with neonatal pituitary stalk transection. J Clin Endocrinol Metab80 :3180–3184.
  17. Popovic V, Damjanovic S, Micic D, Djurovic M, Dieguez C, Casanueva FF. 1995 Blocked GHRP-6-induced growth hormone (GH) secretion and absence of the synergic action of GHRP-6 plus GHRH, in patients with hypothalamopituitary disconnection. Evidence that GHRP-6 main action is exerted at hypothalamic level. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 80:942–947.[Abstract]
  18. Cordido F, Peñalva A, Dieguez C, Casanueva FF. 1993 Massive growth hormone (GH) discharge in obese subjects after the combined administration of GH-releasing hormone and GHRP-6: evidence for a marked somatotroph secretory capability in obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 76:819–823.[Abstract]
  19. Peñalva A, Pombo M, Carballo A, Barreiro J, Casanueva FF, Dieguez C. 1993 Influence of sex, age and adrenergic pathways on the growth hormone response to GHRP-6. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 38:87–91.[Medline]
  20. Ghigo E, Arvat E, Rizzi G, et al. 1994 Growth hormone-releasing activity of growth hormone-releasing peptide 6 is maintained after short-term oral pretreatment with the hexapeptide in normal aging. Eur J Endocrinol. 131:1–4.
  21. Micic D, Popovic V, Kendereski A, Macut D, Casanueva FF, Dieguez C. 1995 Growth hormone secretion after the administration of GHRP-6, or GHRP-6 plus GHRH does not decline in late adulthood. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 42:191–194.[Medline]
  22. Aloi JA, Gertz BJ, Hartman ML, et al. 1994 Neuroendocrine responses to a novel growth hormone secretagogue L-692,429, in healthy older subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 79:943–949.[Abstract]
  23. Chapman IM, Hartman ML, Pezzoli SS, Thorner MO. 1996 Enhancement of pulsatile growth hormone secretion by continuous infusion of a growth hormone-releasing peptide mimetic, L-692,429, in older adults- a clinical research center study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:2874–2880.[Abstract]
  24. Pombo M, Barreiro J, Peñalva A, Mallo F, Casanueva FF, Dieguez C. 1995 Plasma growth hormone response to growth hormone-releasing hexapeptide (GHRP-6) in children with short stature. Acta Paediatr. 84:904–908.[Medline]
  25. Leal-Cerro A, Pumar A, Garcia E, Dieguez C, Casanueva FF. 1994 Blocked growth hormone discharge after the combined administration of GHRH plus GHRP-6 in patients with Cushing’s syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 41:649–654.[Medline]
  26. Leal A, Garcia E, Astorga R, Casanueva FF, Dieguez C. 1995 Growth hormone (GH) responses to the combined administration of GH-releasing hormone plus GH-releasing peptide 6 in adults with GH deficiency. Eur J Endocrinol. 132:712–715.[Abstract]
  27. Pimentel FR, Ramos JC, Ninno FBD, Fcanha CFS, Liberman B, Lengyel AMJ. 1997 Growth hormone responses to GH-releasing peptide (GHRP-6) in hypothyroidism. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 46:295–300.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Villas-Boas RF, Ramos-Diaz JC, Chipoch C, Lengyel AM. 1997 Growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing peptide-6 in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Metabolism. 46:706–710.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Chapman IM, Bach MA, Van Cauter E, et al. 1996 Stimulation of the growth hormone (GH)-insulin like growth factor I axis by daily oral administration of a GH secretagogue (MK-677) in healthy elderly subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:4249–4257.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
K. Chihara, A. Shimatsu, N. Hizuka, T. Tanaka, Y. Seino, Y. Katofor, and the KP-102 Study Group
A simple diagnostic test using GH-releasing peptide-2 in adult GH deficiency
Eur. J. Endocrinol., July 1, 2007; 157(1): 19 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Gasperi, G. Aimaretti, G. Scarcello, G. Corneli, C. Cosci, E. Arvat, E. Martino, and E. Ghigo
Low Dose Hexarelin and Growth Hormone (GH)-Releasing Hormone as a Diagnostic Tool for the Diagnosis of GH Deficiency in Adults: Comparison with Insulin-Induced Hypoglycemia Test
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 1999; 84(8): 2633 - 2637.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Micic, D.
Right arrow Articles by Casanueva, F. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Micic, D.
Right arrow Articles by Casanueva, F. F.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals