| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Original Studies |
Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida College of Medicine, Childrens Medical Services Center (A.R.), 1701 SW 16th Avenue, Gainesville, Florida 32608; Institute of Endocrinology Metabolism and Reproduction (J.G-A.), Quito, Ecuador; and Department of Genetics and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University Medical Center (M.S.B., U.F.), Stanford, California 94305-5323
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Arlan L. Rosenbloom, Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida College of Medicine, Childrens Medical Services Center (A.R.), 1701 SW 16th Avenue, Gainesville, Florida 32608. E-mail: rosenal{at}peds.ufl.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
If heterozygosity for the E180 splice mutation were to influence stature, heights of heterozygous parents of probands would be expected to correlate with those of probands and of carriers who are their offspring and not with heights of their homozygous normal children. Parental height SDS did not correlate with height SDS of affected offspring (r = 0.24). For unaffected siblings as a group or analyzed separately as normals or carriers, there was a strong correlation between parental and offspring SDS for height (P < 0.01 for all comparisons). Thus, the effect of homozygosity for the GHR mutation was so profound as to abolish parental influence on height, and there was no difference in the influence of parental stature between carrier and noncarrier offspring. These findings demonstrate no meaningful effect on stature of heterozygosity for the E180 splice mutation of the GHR, which is a functional null mutation and, in the homozygous state, results in profound short stature from severe insulin-like growth factor-I deficiency.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There has been little information about the influence on stature of heterozygosity of those GHR mutations that cause severe short stature and other clinical manifestations of GHR deficiency (GHRD) in the homozygous state. Stature was thought to be below normal in unaffected siblings and presumed heterozygous parents of Israeli patients (5, 6), but the reference standard for these observations was not the immigrant middle eastern population of which they were a part (7). To appropriately address this issue requires an adequate number of individuals proven to be homozygous normal or heterozygous for the GHR defect causing GHRD in probands. The use of parents as presumed heterozygotes is problematic, because they would have to be compared with their siblings, who may or may not be heterozygotes, as well.
The Ecuadorian population with GHRD is the only large genetically homogeneous population that has been reported with GHRD, currently numbering 70 probands, all but one homozygous for the E180 splice mutation (8). This made it possible to apply contemporary molecular genetic techniques to identify the carrier state. In 1994, we reported an insignificantly shorter mean stature among 41 individuals who were carriers, compared with 24 homozygous normal siblings (9). We have now expanded this study to a larger number of relatives, and analyses indicate that heterozygosity for the E180 splice mutation does not affect stature.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Parents or other relatives of 62 probands were measured for height and studied for carrier status. Subjects and, if minors, their parents, agreed to have height measurements with the understanding that these were for study purposes and comparisons with affected relatives. Blood spots were obtained for genetic analysis after explanation of the mechanism and inheritance of GHRD in this population and agreement by the subject or parent with our policy for reporting results. This policy, developed to avoid labeling or other social problems, is to report only to the individual tested in a counseling session with J.G.-A.; in the case of minors, results are retained at the Institute for Endocrinology Metabolism and Reproduction in Quito, Ecuador and are available when the person reaches adulthood or marries. This approach was discussed extensively within the community and universally approved.
There were 13 affected sibling pairs and one family with 3 siblings affected; in these cases the average SD score (SDS) for height of the affected siblings was used for the comparisons. Genetic and statural data were available for 41 parent pairs and 6 single parents and 95 other relatives. The latter included 74 first-degree relatives of probands (71 siblings and 3 offspring) and 21 second-degree relatives of probands (6 cousins, 8 aunts or uncles, 4 grandparents, and 3 nieces or nephews). Non-first-degree relatives were added to expand the number of normal relatives for comparison; this group provided 12 of the 37 normal relatives and 9 of the 58 heterozygous relatives. All subjects were between the ages of 5 and 50 yr.
Height measurements
Stature was measured in centimeters, either with a fixed stadiometer (Harpenden, Holtain Ltd., Crosswell, Crymych, Dyled, UK) at the Institute in Quito, or in the subjects homes with a Raven Minimetre (Raven Equipment Ltd., Unit #4, Ford Farm Industrial Complex, Raintree Road, Dunnow Essex CM6 1HU, UK) (10). Measurements were done three times, and the average recorded. These height measurements were converted to SDS using U.S. population data (11). For affected children, the last recorded height before starting replacement therapy with recombinant IGF-I was used (12).
Genetic analysis
All probands had been proven to be homozygous for the E180 splice mutation of the GHR gene responsible for GHRD in this population by restriction analysis of a PCR product from exon 6 with the enzyme MnlI (13). This method was also used to determine whether the unaffected relatives were heterozygous carriers of this mutation or homozygous normal.
Data analysis
The t test was used to compare mean SDS for height for homozygous normal and heterozygous relatives. To explore the possible influence of heterozygosity for the E180 splice mutation on stature, correlations for height SDS were calculated between parents and their unaffected offspring, separately as carriers and normals, and combined. Within each family, the mean SDS was used if more than one proband, parent, or sibling of either type was studied.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
As we noted in the early description of a segment of the Ecuadorian
population with GHRD, there was no correlation between mean parental
height SDS and proband height SDS (14) (Table 2
). Correlations between stature of
unaffected siblings and parents were strong, and not different when
parents were compared with all their unaffected offspring, or
separately to their offspring who were homozygous normal or carriers
(Table 2
).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
As we have previously noted, the effect of homozygosity for this mutation is so profound that there is not a significant influence of parental heights on proband heights, nor do the proband heights correlate with unaffected sibling heights (14). This lack of correlation for stature between the heterozygous carrier parents and affected offspring argues against an effect on stature of the carrier state. This contrasts with conditions such as Turner syndrome in which, despite substantial growth retardation, the probands heights are still strongly influenced by parental endowment and correlate with those of normal siblings (15). If heterozygosity for the GHR mutation in this population were to be phenotypically influential, one would also expect that the correlation between stature of offspring who do not have GHRD and that of their heterozygous parents would be influenced by whether the offspring are homozygous normal or carriers. In contrast to the lack of significant correlation of parental with proband height SDS, there was a highly significant correlation between parental and unaffected offspring SDS, whether the offspring were carriers or not.
The distinct mutations that have been identified in the GHR gene include a number resulting in GHRD in the homozygous or compound heterozygous state, several purported to result in partial GH insensitivity in the heterozygous state (2), and one proven to do so in a dominant-negative fashion (4). In addition, a number of polymorphisms have been described that do not appear to influence the GH/IGF-I axis (16, 17). The findings reported here indicate that there is no effect on stature of heterozygosity for the E180 splice mutation that causes GHRD in the homozygous state. This mutation creates a new splice site within exon 6 that is exclusively used and causes a predicted deletion of eight amino acids. The predicted mutant receptor molecule has the potential to act in a dominant-negative fashion by heterodimerization with the products of the normal allele. The lack of clinical evidence for this occurring supports our previous hypothesis that the eight-amino acid deletion causes protein misfolding and degradation (18). Therefore, it is likely that the E180 splice mutation is a functional null mutation. In contrast, missense mutations and structural mutations that lead to a stable mutant protein might have effects on growth in heterozygotes.
| Note Added in Proof |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Current address: Department of Internal Medicine, University of
Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa 52242. ![]()
Received January 15, 1998.
Revised February 23, 1998.
Accepted April 10, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. M. C. Pereira, M. H. Aguiar-Oliveira, A. Sagazio, C. R. P. Oliveira, F. T. Oliveira, V. C. Campos, C. T. Farias, T. A. R. Vicente, M. B. Gois Jr, J. L. M. Oliveira, et al. Heterozygosity for a Mutation in the Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone Receptor Gene Does Not Influence Adult Stature, But Affects Body Composition J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2007; 92(6): 2353 - 2357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Rowland, L. M. Kerr, M. White, P. G. Noakes, and M. J. Waters Heterozygote Effects in Mice with Partial Truncations in the Growth Hormone Receptor Cytoplasmic Domain: Assessment of Growth Parameters and Phenotype Endocrinology, December 1, 2005; 146(12): 5278 - 5286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Laron Laron Syndrome (Primary Growth Hormone Resistance or Insensitivity): The Personal Experience 1958-2003 J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2004; 89(3): 1031 - 1044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. K. Buckway, K. A. Selva, K. L. Pratt, E. Tjoeng, J. Guevara-Aguirre, and R. G. Rosenfeld Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein-3 Generation as a Measure of GH Sensitivity J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2002; 87(10): 4754 - 4765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Marzullo, C. Buckway, K. L. Pratt, A. Colao, J. Guevara-Aguirre, and R. G. Rosenfeld Leptin Concentrations in GH Deficiency: The Effect of GH Insensitivity J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2002; 87(2): 540 - 545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. K. Buckway, J. Guevara-Aguirre, K. L. Pratt, C. P. Burren, and R. G. Rosenfeld The IGF-I Generation Test Revisited: A Marker of GH Sensitivity J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2001; 86(11): 5176 - 5183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sjoberg, T. Salazar, C. Espinosa, A. Dagnino, A. Avila, M. Eggers, F. Cassorla, P. Carvallo, and M. V. Mericq Study of GH Sensitivity in Chilean Patients with Idiopathic Short Stature J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2001; 86(9): 4375 - 4381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Growth Hormone Receptor Deficiency in Ecuador J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 1999; 84(12): 4436 - 4443. [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |