| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Original Studies |
Department of Endocrinology, Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom M20 4BX
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Prof. S. M. Shalet, Department of Endocrinology, Christie Hospital, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, United Kingdom M20 4BX.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The frequency of GH pulses in acromegaly is increased (7, 8, 9, 10, 11), and this
has been interpreted by several authors as evidence that acromegaly is
due to a primary hypothalamic abnormality, with secondary development
of a pituitary neoplasm (7, 9, 11). Conversely, there is evidence that
acromegaly is due to a primary pituitary defect, as the abnormal GH
pulsatility in acromegaly may revert to a normal pattern after complete
removal of the pituitary tumor (8, 10). Furthermore, somatotroph
adenomas are of monoclonal origin (12), and up to 40% have been shown
to have an abnormality of the Gs
subunit (gsp
oncogene mutation) (13, 14).
Surgery remains the favored mode of therapy in the majority of patients and may be completely curative, particularly in the case of microadenomas (15, 16, 17). The majority of macroadenomas require further treatment in the form of radiotherapy and/or medical therapy. Radiotherapy is excellent at halting tumor growth, but the slow reduction in GH concentration (18), damage to the normal hypothalamic pituitary axis-necessitating lifelong replacement hormone therapy (19), and the recent evidence to suggest lack of normalization of IGF-1 (20) are obvious disadvantages.
Recent studies have suggested that GH levels below 2 ng/mL are associated with normalization of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) (21, 22). Similarly, patients who achieve such GH levels after treatment have improved long term survival (23), predominantly as a result of a reduction in the excess cardiovascular mortality associated with acromegaly (23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28). Thus, the current definition of "cure" in acromegaly stipulates a reduction in mean GH concentrations to less than 2 ng/mL (<5 mU/L) (23, 29). However, we hypothesized that in patients in whom such GH levels had been achieved, hypothalamic neuroregulatory control of GH secretion might be affected differently by the alternative modes of therapy used to produce a cure.
We, therefore, sought to further define the nature of the cure in those patients who achieve a mean GH concentration below 2 ng/mL by different therapeutic interventions, i.e. those cured by surgery only or by radiotherapy. We have assessed this in terms of the ability of the somatotroph to release GH in response to arginine. Arginine was chosen because it is generally accepted that arginine predominantly, although not exclusively (30), causes GH release by the inhibition of SMS (31, 32); the test can safely be used in patients of any age; and the GH response is not age dependent (33, 34). We hypothesized that the GH response to arginine in cured acromegalics could be used to reflect the underlying SMS tone and any existing hypothalamic dysregulation of GH secretion.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Each subject fasted from 2200 h and had an iv cannula inserted into the antecubital fossa. The following morning at 0900 h, each subject underwent an arginine stimulation test (20 g arginine/m2 given iv over 30 min from 0 min). Blood was sampled for GH at time zero and every 30 min for 150 min. GH was measured using a two-site immunoradiometric assay, with a limit of detection of 0.4 ng/mL. Interassay coefficients of variation were 8.8%, 5.5%, and 6% at GH concentrations of 2, 10, and 26 ng/mL, respectively. Blood was also sampled for IGF-I at 0 min.
Results are expressed as medians (with the ranges in parentheses) and were analyzed using ANOVA; comparisons were made using Dunns test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. For purposes of analysis a reported GH value of less than 0.4 ng/mL was regarded as 0.4 ng/mL. Ethical approval was granted by the South Manchester Medical research ethics committee.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The median (range) GH during a 24-h profile was similar in each
group: S, 1.3 (0.71.8) ng/mL; R, 0.6 (0.41.8) ng/mL; and C, 0.7
(0.43.2) ng/mL (P = 0.57; Fig. 1
). The median IGF-I level was
significantly elevated in the R group compared with that in C subjects,
whereas the median IGF-I level in the S patients was not significantly
different from that in either the C or the R group: S, 219 (124853)
ng/mL; R, 273 (100792) ng/mL; and C, 156 (89342) ng/mL
(P < 0.02; S vs. R, P >
0.05; S vs. C, P > 0.05; R vs.
C, P < 0.05; Fig. 2
).
|
|
Basal GH concentrations were similar: S, 0.6 (0.42.2) ng/mL;
R, 1.0 (0.44.5) ng/mL; and C, 0.6 (0.44.7) ng/mL (P
= 0.94). Median incremental GH responses were significantly lower in
the R group compared with those in the S or C group: S, 6.4 (2.116.6)
ng/mL; R, 0.1 (01.7) ng/mL; and C, 9.2 (016.1) ng/mL
(P = 0.0002; S vs. R, P <
0.01; S vs. C, P > 0.05; R vs.
C, P < 0.001; Fig. 3
).
The total area under the curve from 0150 min revealed similar
results: S, 580 (2751264) ng/mL·min; R, 154 (60390) ng/mL·min;
and C, 635 (601476) ng/mL·min (P = 0.0002; S
vs. R, P < 0.01; S vs. C,
P > 0.05; R vs. C, P <
0.001). No correlation was found between the IGF-I level and the
incremental GH response to arginine for either the patients or
controls.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The major finding of this study, is the striking difference in the GH response to arginine between the R and S acromegalic patients. All of the S acromegalic patients had an incremental GH response in excess of the incremental GH response of every patient in the R group. Indeed, most patients in the R group exhibited only a minimal GH response to arginine, and six patients had no GH response. It is known that both the normal somatotroph and GH-secreting adenomas release GH in response to arginine (35, 36), and it has been postulated that this occurs primarily through the inhibition of SMS from the hypothalamus (31, 32), although contributions via the release of GHRH (30) and possibly the putative endogenous GH-releasing peptide cannot be totally excluded (37). The lack of a GH response to arginine in the R group therefore suggests either hypothalamic dysfunction or complete destruction of both normal and abnormal somatotrophs of the pituitary by radiotherapy. Some of the patients in the radiotherapy group had mean 24-h GH concentrations below 0.4 ng/mL, and thus the lack of response to arginine stimulation may represent a complete absence of normal and abnormal somatotrophs. However, other patients in this group have clear evidence of GH secretion during 24 h, with or without an elevated IGF-I, and yet no GH response to arginine occurred. Furthermore, there was no differentiation in the arginine-induced GH response between those radiotherapy treated patients with detectable GH and a raised IGF-I level and the four patients who had an undetectable GH concentration during a 24-h profile. In view of the putative mechanism of GH release during arginine stimulation, it can be inferred from the above results that damage has occurred to the SMS-producing cells of the hypothalamus (and possibly to the GHRH neurons also). In view of the similar GH responses to arginine in the S and C groups, this suggests that radiotherapy per se has caused damage to the SMS-producing cells of the hypothalamus.
These findings are consistent with previous findings that radiotherapy causes hypopituitarism by inducing damage primarily within the hypothalamus rather than the pituitary gland (38, 39, 40); thus, the hypothalamus is more radiosensitive than the pituitary (41). Two of the patients received yttrium implantation as primary therapy (one of whom subsequently also received external beam radiotherapy). Both of these patients had mean GH levels below 0.4 ng/mL and had no response to arginine. This may represent hypothalamic damage, but is more likely to represent complete pituitary somatotroph destruction, as yttrium is conventionally thought to cause less damage to the hypothalamus (42).
Few studies have examined the GH response to arginine in patients with acromegaly who have been treated with radiotherapy. Where the individual GH results have been documented, the patients have shown varying GH responses to arginine. Such patients have not, however, been cured acromegalics, and the time after radiotherapy has not been stated in these studies (35, 36). Clearly, the time from radiotherapy may be an important factor in the development of hypothalamic damage.
Recently, using an ultrasensitive chemiluminescent GH assay, it has been shown that GH release remains pulsatile in GH-deficient patients with pituitary disease who have undergone surgery and radiotherapy (43). Similarly, it has been suggested that radiotherapy reduces, but does not completely abolish, SMS and GHRH release (44). These studies suggest that although SMS and GHRH release may be greatly reduced by radiotherapy, they continue to be secreted, albeit perhaps at low concentrations. Such findings are compatible with the results of this study. It should be noted, however, that 3 of 16 healthy control subjects also had minimal or no GH response to arginine stimulation. This is consistent with previous reports in normal subjects using this test (33, 34) and confirms that for a given individual, the lack of a GH response to arginine may not necessarily indicate hypothalamic or pituitary disease.
Somatotroph tumors are known to express SMS receptors to a variable degree, and as such, patients with acromegaly show variable GH suppression during SMS analog therapy (45). If radiotherapy induces damage or destruction of the SMS-producing cells of the hypothalamus, then this may induce an alteration of SMS receptor expression by the tumor. We hypothesize that such an alteration of SMS receptor expression might alter the sensitivity of those radiotherapy-treated tumors to exogenous SMS analog therapy compared to that of those tumors that have been treated with surgery only. Similarly, if such a change in receptor expression does follow radiotherapy, then the exact timing of this change is unknown, i.e. how long after radiotherapy does endogenous SMS production decline. Further studies are required to answer these questions, as the effectiveness and dose-response relationship of subsequent SMS analog therapy may be influenced by prior pituitary radiotherapy.
In conclusion, we have shown that in acromegalic patients deemed to be cured (GH <2 ng/mL), the mode of therapy has considerable influence on remaining hypothalamic-somatotroph function. We suggest that radiotherapy leads to a reduction or complete loss of endogenous hypothalamic SMS tone. This may have implications for the treatment of those acromegalic patients who are not cured (GH >2 ng/mL) and who require SMS analog therapy.
|
|
Revised February 3, 1998.
Accepted February 11, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Sherlock, E. Fernandez-Rodriguez, A. A. Alonso, R. C. Reulen, J. Ayuk, R. N. Clayton, G. Holder, M. C. Sheppard, A. Bates, and P. M. Stewart Medical Therapy in Patients with Acromegaly: Predictors of Response and Comparison of Efficacy of Dopamine Agonists and Somatostatin Analogues J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2009; 94(4): 1255 - 1263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Losa, L. Gioia, P. Picozzi, A. Franzin, M. Valle, M. Giovanelli, and P. Mortini The Role of Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Patients with Growth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary Adenoma J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2008; 93(7): 2546 - 2552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Parkinson, P. Burman, M. Messig, and P. J. Trainer Gender, Body Weight, Disease Activity, and Previous Radiotherapy Influence the Response to Pegvisomant J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2007; 92(1): 190 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Ayuk, R. N. Clayton, G. Holder, M. C. Sheppard, P. M. Stewart, and A. S. Bates Growth Hormone and Pituitary Radiotherapy, But Not Serum Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Concentrations, Predict Excess Mortality in Patients with Acromegaly J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2004; 89(4): 1613 - 1617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. U. Freda, A. T. Nuruzzaman, C. M. Reyes, R. E. Sundeen, and K. D. Post Significance of "Abnormal" Nadir Growth Hormone Levels after Oral Glucose in Postoperative Patients with Acromegaly in Remission with Normal Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Levels J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2004; 89(2): 495 - 500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Peacey, A. A. Toogood, J. D. Veldhuis, M. O. Thorner, and S. M. Shalet The Relationship between 24-Hour Growth Hormone Secretion and Insulin-Like Growth Factor I in Patients with Successfully Treated Acromegaly: Impact of Surgery or Radiotherapy J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2001; 86(1): 259 - 266. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Powell, S. L. Wardlaw, K. D. Post, and P. U. Freda Outcome of Radiotherapy for Acromegaly Using Normalization of Insulin-Like Growth Factor I to Define Cure J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2000; 85(5): 2068 - 2071. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H.E. Turner and J.A.H. Wass Modern approaches to treating acromegaly QJM, January 1, 2000; 93(1): 1 - 6. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. U. Freda, K. D. Post, J. S. Powell, and S. L. Wardlaw Evaluation of Disease Status with Sensitive Measures of Growth Hormone Secretion in 60 Postoperative Patients with Acromegaly J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 1998; 83(11): 3808 - 3816. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |