help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gautier, J.-F.
Right arrow Articles by Cathelineau, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gautier, J.-F.
Right arrow Articles by Cathelineau, G.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 83, No. 4 1306-1311
Copyright © 1998 by The Endocrine Society


Original Articles

Evaluation of Abdominal Fat Distribution in Noninsulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus: Relationship to Insulin Resistance1

Jean-François Gautier, Agnès Mourier, Eric de Kerviler, Arnaud Tarentola, André Xavier Bigard, Jean-Marie Villette, Charles Yannick Guezennec and Gérard Cathelineau

Service de Diabétologie et d’Hormonologie et Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Saint-Louis, 75475 Paris Cedex 10, France; and IMASSA, Centre d’Essais en Vol, Département de Physiologie Systémique, 91223 Bretigny sur Orge, France

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Jean-François Gautier, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 4212 North 16th Street, Phoenix, Arizona 85016.

Abstract

Accumulation of visceral adipose tissue is associated with metabolic complications such as noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of abdominal adipose tissue on insulin sensitivity in subjects with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Areas of abdominal fat were calculated from axial magnetic resonance images obtained at the level of the umbilicus in 21 men with NIDDM [age, 45.6 ± 8.3 (±SD) yr; body mass index, 29.3 ± 4.5 kg/m-2; total body fat (skinfold thickness), 26.8 ± 5.4%; waist to hip ratio, 0.97 ± 0.07; duration of diabetes, 59 ± 47 months; hemoglobin A1c, 8.1 ± 1.5%]. Insulin sensitivity was evaluated by an insulin tolerance test. The areas of deep abdominal fat and sc abdominal fat were, respectively, 135.3 ± 55.1 and 211.8 ± 99.1 cm2. The blood glucose disappearance rate was 2.11 ± 0.87%/min and was negatively related to deep abdominal fat (r = 0.72; P = 0.0025). In contrast, areas of sc abdominal fat, total body fat, body mass index, and waist to hip ratio were not related to the blood glucose disappearance rate. Plasma triglyceride concentrations averaged 1.8 ± 0.8 mmol/L and were positively related to deep abdominal fat (r = 0.69; P = 0.0018). We conclude that insulin sensitivity is strongly related to visceral adipose tissue accumulation in NIDDM.

SEVERAL prospective studies have shown that obesity is a risk factor for noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). However, as Vague suggested in 1956 (1), recent studies based on the waist to hip ratio (WHR) indicate that the distribution of fat in the upper body area seems to be a greater risk factor for NIDDM and cardiovascular disease than obesity itself (2, 3, 4). The WHR is a simple anthropometric variable that provides an estimation of the proportion of abdominal or upper body fat. However, it does not distinguish accumulations of visceral adipose tissue (VAT), also called deep abdominal fat, from sc abdominal adipose tissue (SAT). Recently, computed tomography was used to measure the amounts of VAT and SAT. The results obtained with this technique indicated that several abnormalities of the plurimetabolic syndrome that predispose to NIDDM, such as insulin resistance, increased blood pressure, and dyslipidemia, were more pronounced in subjects with a type of fat distribution that reflected greater adiposity in the visceral abdominal regions (5, 6, 7). A prospective study conducted in Japanese-American men showed that in individuals who develop NIDDM, increased deep abdominal fat is present before the onset of NIDDM (8). More recently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used, as adipose tissue (AT) is characterized by a typical short longitudinal relaxation time (t1) compared to that in other tissues (9, 10). Moreover, this method does not involve x-ray exposure, and the duration for abdominal evaluation of fat is shorter than that using computed tomography. The reproducibility of MRI results is known to be lower than that of computed tomography, but could be greatly increased by the use of a reference tube to eliminate internal parameters (11). Measurements of abdominal fat distribution evaluated by computed tomography or MRI in Caucasians with type 2 diabetes mellitus suggest that NIDDM is associated with more accumulation of deep abdominal fat than that in nondiabetic subjects with similar body weight (12, 13). The aim of our study was to evaluate abdominal fat distribution in these patients and to investigate the relationship between the amount of VAT and insulin resistance. Whole body insulin sensitivity was assessed using the insulin tolerance test (ITT) according to the method of Bonora et al. (14).

Experimental Subjects

Inclusion criteria required that subjects be middle-aged men with NIDDM at stable body weight for at least 3–4 months. A known duration of diabetes less than 10 yr was mandatory. Twenty-one patients were selected for the study. The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of Saint-Louis Hospital. All patients gave their written informed consent. Most of them were slightly obese. Glycated hemoglobin was 8.1 ± 1.5% (mean ± SD). Patients were treated with hypoglycemic agents (n = 17) or by diet alone (n = 4). Hypoglycemic agents consisted of metformin alone for 14 patients and sulfonylurea alone for 3 patients. They did not receive hypotensive treatment, and blood pressure was recorded after 10 min in the supine position with a mercury sphygmomanometer. No patient had significant renal, hepatic, or cardiac disease, and none was using agents known to affect glucose metabolism, except hypoglycemic agents. They had no micro- or macrodiabetic angiopathy. Maximal electrocardiogram exercise testing was negative.

Food diaries were recorded daily for 1 week by the patients and were analyzed using dietetic tables (15). The level of physical activity was evaluated using Beacke’s questionnaire (16).

Materials and Methods

Exercise testing

The maximal oxygen uptake (O2max) was determined by a direct method using an open system to analyze expired gases (Sensor Medics 2900, Sensor Medics Corp., Yorba Linda, CA). Subjects exercised on a mechanically braked ergocycle (Monark Crescent, Valberg, Sweden) according to an incremental protocol used for O2max determination. The maximal exercise test began by a 2-min warm-up at 30 watts, followed by the incremental test during which power output increased by 30 watts every 2 min (17). A pedaling frequency of 60 rpm was selected. The test protocol was adjusted to ensure attainment of maximal effort within 15–20 min. Oxygen uptake, per min ventilation, respiratory exchange ratio, heart rate, and power (watts) were continuously monitored. O2max was achieved when O2 demonstrated a plateau during an increase in power output and/or the respiratory exchange ratio was higher than 1.1, the blood lactate concentration was higher than 8 mmol/L, and the subject exhibited motor deficiencies and visual tiredness (17). Because O2 did not reach a plateau in most patients, the highest VO2 value obtained during incremental exercise corresponded to a O2 peak rather than O2max.

Resting metabolic rate

Subjects went to the laboratory at 0830 h in the postabsorptive state after a 12-h fast. They sat quietly in a semisupine position. After a 30-min rest period, baseline postabsorptive metabolic rate was measured during 30 min by Sensor Medics 2900’s dilution mode indirect calorimetry testing with a mask (without a mouthpiece). Laboratory temperature was maintained at 24 C throughout the study. The gas analyzers were recalibrated before each test to correct for drift in the analyzers. During the postabsorptive metabolic rate, subjects were allowed to read throughout the measurement period. For each metabolic measurement, the respiratory quotient (CO2/O2) was calculated, and the result was converted to kilocalories using Weir’s equation (18). For repeated measurements of the resting metabolic rate, we reported that the mean difference was 3.7% (19).

Anthropometric variables

Height of the barefoot subject was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm. Body weight was measured on the same standard medical weight scale with an accuracy of ±100 g, and body mass index (BMI; kilograms per m2) was calculated. The waist circumference was measured as the narrowest circumference between the lower costal margin and the iliac crest in the standing position. The hip measurement was the maximum circumference at the level of the femoral trochanters.

Whole body fat was estimated using the skinfold thickness method developed by Durnin and Womersley (20). Briefly, skinfold measurements were taken from four sites (bicipital, tricipital, subscapular, and suprailiac) using a Harpenden skinfold calliper (Serita, East Rutherford, NJ). A minimum of two measurements were made at each skinfold site by the same highly experienced investigator. The values were averaged and used to estimate body fat percentage.

AT measurement by MRI

MRI examinations were performed on a 0.5-Tesla superconducting MR system (MRMax, General Electric, Milwaukee, WI). Subjects were positioned in the magnet in a supine feet-first position. A T1-weighted multislice spin echo sequence was obtained using a repetition time of 500 ms and an echo time of 25 ms. These parameters provide optimal contrast between AT and lean tissue. The MR sequence included three 7-mm-thick axial images with a 3-mm gap and was performed in the abdomen at the level of the umbilicus. The measurement of AT surfaces was performed on large regions of interest (ROIs) drawn manually on each slice (Fig. 1Go). One ROI included the largest cross-sectional area of SAT, and the other one included the largest cross-sectional area of VAT. Segmentation of AT within ROIs was performed as previously described (11, 19). Briefly, unlike images from computed tomography, no standard scale exists for magnetic resonance images. Consequently, pixel intensity value for a given tissue may not be consistent from slice to slice or from one individual to the next. To set a common dynamic range for all images, a 1.5-cm diameter reference tube was filled to capacity with a solution of gadolinium-DOTA (0.5 mmol/L) and placed on either side of the subjects during data acquisition. The reference tube serves as an internal marker to determine the threshold of pixels corresponding to AT. The analysis of a sample of typical images and their respective gray level histograms allowed us to determine the optimal threshold of AT as 0.7-fold that of the reference tube. Above this value, pixels were considered as bearing witness to AT. The next step involved highlighting and counting the AT pixels in response to the selected threshold, and multiplying by the pixel surface to calculate the surface of AT. This measurement was performed on the three slices and then averaged. The reproducibility of the measurements was tested on a sample of 10 patients. Intra- and interobserver variations did not exceed 2%. Because we used a reference tube, the pixel intensity threshold of AT was the same in all patients. The intra- and interobserver variations depended only on the drawing of ROIs.



View larger version (125K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Axial T1-weighted MRI obtained at the level of umbilicus. Two large ROIs have been drawn manually, encompassing the largest cross-sectional areas of SAT and VAT. The reference tube allows to determine the threshold of AT.

 
Biological variables

An iv ITT was performed after an overnight fast, at least 48 h after the withdrawal of metformin. The ITT consisted of a bolus iv injection of regular insulin (0.1 U/kg BW) (14). Blood samples were collected 1 min before and 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 min after insulin injection. The constant rate plasma glucose disappearance (Kitt) was calculated from the formula 0.693/t1/2. The plasma glucose t1/2 was calculated from the slope of least square analysis of the plasma glucose concentrations from 3–15 min after iv insulin injection, when the plasma glucose concentration declined linearly. Fasting blood glucose levels were assayed in neutralized blood samples using a glucose oxidase enzymatic method (21), whereas plasma insulin concentrations were measured by RIA using a commercial reagent (INSIK-5, Sorin Biomedica). Glycated hemoglobin levels (normal value, <6%) were determined by high performance liquid chromatography. Fasting serum lipids were measured enzymatically, and fasting plasma free fatty acids (FFA) concentrations were assayed according to the method of Ho (22).

Statistical analysis

All data are given as the mean ± SD. All statistical analyses were performed using StatView II software (Abacus Concept, Berkeley, CA). The relations between variables were analyzed by both simple and multiple regression with stepwise variable selection. P < 0.05 was selected to indicate significant values.

Results

Subjects were 45.6 ± 8.3 yr old. They had a BMI of 29.3 ± 4.5 kg/m2 and a body fat of 26.8 ± 5.4%. The WHR averaged 0.97 ± 0.07. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure values were near normal (133 ± 14 and 84 ± 8 mm Hg, respectively). The O2 peak was 22.7 ± 4.0 mL/kg·min. Resting energy expenditure averaged 1603 ± 336 Cal/day. The biological characteristics of the study subjects are summarized in Table 1Go.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Biological characteristics of patients

 
Areas of VAT and SAT were 135.3 ± 55.1 cm2 (range, 59.5–240.5) and 211.8 ± 99.1 cm2 (range, 76.5–380.1), respectively. All patients were insulin resistant as indicated the blood glucose disappearance rate Kitt, which was 2.11 ± 0.87%/min and ranged from 0.21–3.48%/min (normal, 5.6 ± 0.9%).

Correlation between insulin sensitivity and anthropometric parameters

Table 2Go shows the correlation coefficients between anthropometric measures and metabolic indexes. There was a high significant inverse correlation between Kitt and VAT, as depicted in Fig. 2Go. A negative correlation was seen between Kitt and plasma triglyceride concentrations (Fig. 2Go). Conversely, Kitt was not associated with areas of SAT, total body fat, BMI, or WHR. No relationship was seen between Kitt and fasting insulin concentrations. Figure 2Go also shows the lack of correlation between Kitt and SAT (r = 0.17). The stepwise multiple regression with Kitt as the dependent variable and anthropometric measures, MRI parameters, biochemical analyses, and VO2peak as independent variables yielded only one significant variable (VAT), which accounted for about 52% of the variance in Kitt (r = 0.72).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Correlation matrix between anthropometric measures and metabolic variables

 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Correlation between insulin sensitivity and MRI parameters and fasting triglyceride levels.

 
Correlation between abdominal fat distribution and others variables

As shown in Table 2Go, areas of VAT were correlated only with Kitt and fasting plasma triglyceride levels. The stepwise multiple regression excluded plasma triglyceride concentrations as a significant variable. WHR were weakly associated with areas of SAT, but not with areas of VAT. Areas of SAT were also related to BMI (r = 0.87; P = 0.001) and to whole body fat (r = 0.66; P = 0.0026)

Relationship of insulin sensitivity and VAT to physical fitness and cardiovascular parameters

Simple regression analysis did not show any relationship between O2peak and Kitt (r = 0.14) or areas of VAT (r = 0.13). Resting energy expenditure values were also not related to these parameters. No correlation was seen between insulin sensitivity and diastolic or systolic blood pressure (r = 0.15 and r = 0.23, respectively). Furthermore, blood pressure was not correlated with areas of VAT. No relationship was observed between insulin sensitivity and physical exercise level or diet composition.

Discussion

Accumulation of deep abdominal fat is associated with a multitude of metabolic complications, such as glucose intolerance, hyperinsulinemia, changes in plasma lipid concentrations, and increased blood pressure. Indeed, it is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular disease and other metabolic complications of obesity, such as NIDDM, than is overall fitness (7, 8). It was previously suggested in the U.S. that overweight Caucasian patients with NIDDM have more VAT accumulation than nondiabetic obese patients with similar BMI (13). Moreover, lean Japanese-America subjects have more intraabdominal adiposity than control subjects (12). Thus, the present clinical investigation was aimed at investigating abdominal fat distribution in NIDDM patients living in Europe and the relationship between insulin sensitivity and the amount of VAT. Thanks to the use of a reference tube and the reliability of MRI, the method we used to estimate abdominal fat distribution was close to computed tomography. Our MRI protocol determined abdominal fat distribution at only one level. However, Ross et al. (23) showed that the results obtained by this method correlate well with total intraabdominal fat. Insulin sensitivity was determined by the short ITT, a simple test widely used in clinical investigations. A good correlation had been demonstrated between the blood glucose disappearance rate (Kitt) and the amount of glucose uptake obtained from the euglycemic hyperinsulinic clamp (14, 24, 25). The reproducibility of this test seems to be satisfactory, as the intratest coefficient of variation varied from 6–14% (14, 24, 25, 26) (Gautier, J.-F., personal data). Contrary to the euglycemic hyperinsulinic clamp, the ITT is an indirect method that estimates the whole body insulin sensitivity without distinguishing the effect of insulin on muscle from that on liver. However, one can speculate that an iv bolus of 0.1 IU/kg leads to such supraphysiological plasma insulin concentrations that it rapidly inhibits hepatic glucose production (27).

Our finding shows clearly that insulin sensitivity is inversely associated with the amount of VAT in NIDDM patients. The higher the amount of VAT, the lower the insulin sensitivity. Several studies found such an association between glucose metabolism and VAT in nondiabetic populations or in the prediabetic state (5, 6, 7, 8, 28, 29). Our results are also consistent with the study by Banerji et al. (30) carried out in African-American NIDDM men with approximately the same range of weight as our patients, in which a strong correlation was seen between insulin-mediated glucose uptake and VAT. Moreover, they found that insulin sensitivity is inversely related to serum triglyceride levels, as has been described in other, but nondiabetic, populations. However, in the study of Abate et al. (31), no correlation was seen between insulin sensitivity and intraperitoneal AT in Caucasian subjects with NIDDM, whereas these parameters were correlated in the control group. Our patients were younger than those of Abate’s study and were approximately the same age as his control group. This age difference may partly explain the discrepancy between both studies. In addition, in Abate’s study, insulin sensitivity has been adjusted for lean body mass. We did not report our data per kg lean body mass because of the limitations of the method using skinfold thickness in overweight subjects.

Although to date no study has successfully identified the mechanisms of the link between insulin resistance and VAT, it has been suggested that the high lipolytic response of VAT to catecholamines (32, 33) exposes the liver to high FFA concentrations via the portal circulation, thereby leading to insulin resistance (34). Indeed, the link between FFA and hepatic glucose production is now well documented (35), and it has been shown that FFAs inhibit insulin-stimulated whole body glucose uptake and utilization in patients with NIDDM (36).

Another point raised by our study is that WHR was weakly associated with BMI, but was not related to areas of VAT or to insulin sensitivity. Banerji et al. (30) and Ross et al. (10) found a weak relation between WHR and VAT accumulation. One factor that may influence the relationship between VAT and WHR is the level of waist circumference used to calculate WHR. Thus, Peiris et al. (37) observed a significant correlation between WHR and areas of VAT when WHR was calculated using a waist circumference obtained at the level of minimum girth instead of the umbilicus. Another factor that may contribute to the discrepancy is that WHR is normally obtained with the subject in a standing position, whereas computed tomography or MRI are obtained in supine subject. Indeed, the effect of gravity may change the position of abdominal mass. However, Ross et al. (10) did not see an improvement in the relation between VAT and WHR when WHR was determined in supine position. Banerji et al. (30) found a better correlation between VAT and waist circumference than between VAT and WHR in black NIDDM subjects. Waist circumference has been shown to be a good predictor of cardiovascular risk factors (38, 39). Moreover, recent epidemiological studies showed that waist circumference is more strongly related to insulin sensitivity than is WHR itself in a population-based sample of young healthy Caucasian subjects (40) and in African-American and Caucasian men and women (41). The Manitoba heart study (42), a cross-sectional study including 2792 adults, indicates that BMI could be a better predictor than WHR of the metabolic effects of central obesity. Finally, according to some studies, WHR is a poor predictor of change in visceral fat after dietary restriction (43) or a physical exercise program (19).

In conclusion, insulin resistance is associated with visceral fat accumulation in NIDDM Caucasian subjects. In this population, WHR is not a predictor of VAT or insulin resistance. The close link between VAT and insulin resistance, a major characteristic of NIDDM, should encourage us to make visceral fat depot reduction a more important goal than reducing total body weight itself.



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Analysis of Fas expression in term human fetal membrane tissue by RT-PCR and Northern blotting procedures. Samples containing 1 µg total RNA from term amnion (A), chorion (C), decidua (D), and placenta (P) were reverse transcribed and then amplified using Fas- and GAPDH-specific primers (a). The positions of the amplified PCR products for Fas (266 bp) and GAPDH (788 bp) are indicated by arrows at the right of the gel. No bands were observed when RNA was not added to the RT-PCR reaction mixture (-). The positions of the {phi}x 174 DNA standards ({phi}x) are indicated at the left of the figure. Northern blotting was carried out using 2 µg polyadenylated RNA extracted from an amnion at term (b). Fas mRNA was detected at a mol wt of approximately 1.9 kb (indicated by an arrow at the left of the gel) after hybridization to a labeled cDNA to Fas. The migration of 28S and 18S ribosomal RNAs in a sample of total RNA run on the same gel is shown at the right of the figure.

 
Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Françoise Lienhard, Maryse Souillard, and Elisabeth Treillard for their skillful technical help.

Footnotes

1 This work was supported by the Caisse Nationale de Prévoyance, the Caisse Nationale d’Assurance Maladie des Professions Indépendantes, the Caisse Maladie Régionale des Professions Industrielles et Commerciales d’Ile de France, and the Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris. Back

Received May 27, 1997.

Revised October 17, 1997.

Accepted December 15, 1997.

References

  1. Vague J. 1956 The degree of masculine differentiation of obesities: a factor determining predisposition to diabetes, atherosclerosis, gout, and uriccalcuous disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 4:20–34.[Abstract]
  2. Evans DJ, Hoffmann RG, Kalkhoff RK, Kissebah AH. 1984 Relationship of body fat topography to insulin sensitivity and metabolic profiles in premenopausal women. Metabolism. 33:68–75.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Ohlson LO, Larsson B, Svärdsudd K, et al. 1984 The influence of body fat distribution on the incidence of diabetes mellitus: 13.5 years of follow-up of the participants in the study of men born in 1913. Diabetes. 34:1055–1058.[Abstract]
  4. Haffner SM, Stern MP, Hazuda HP, Pugh J, Patterson JK. 1987 Do upper-body and centralized adiposity measure different aspects of regional body-fat distribution? Relationship to non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, lipids, and lipoproteins. Diabetes. 36:43–51.[Abstract]
  5. Sparrow D, Borkan GA, Gerzof SG, Wisniewski C, Silbert CK. 1986 Relationship of fat distribution to glucose tolerance. Results of computed tomography in male participants of the normative aging study. Diabetes. 35:411–415.[Abstract]
  6. Fujioka S, Matsuzawa Y, Tokunaga K, Tarui S. 1987 Contribution of intra-abdominal fat accumulation to the impairment of glucose and lipid metabolism in human obesity. Metabolism. 36:54–59.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Després JP, Nadeau A, Tremblay A, et al. 1989 Role of deep abdominal fat in the association between regional adipose tissue distribution and glucose tolerance in obese women. Diabetes. 38:304–309.[Abstract]
  8. Bergstrom RW, Newell-Morris LL, Leonetti DL, Shuman WP, Wahl PW, Fujimoto WY. 1990 Association of elevated fasting C-peptide level and increased intra-abdominal fat distribution with development of NIDDM in Japanese-American men. Diabetes. 39:104–111.[Abstract]
  9. Dooms GC, Hricak H, Margulis AR, DE Geer G. 1986 MR imaging of fat. Radiology. 158:51–54.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Ross R, Léger L, Morris D, De Guise J, Guando R. 1992 Quantification of adipose tissue by MRI: relationship with anthropometric variables. J Appl Physiol. 72:787–795.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Mourier A, Bigard AX, de Kerviler E, Roger B, Legrand H, Guezennec CY. 1997 Combined effects of caloric restriction and branched-chain amino acid supplement on body composition and selected performance parameters in elite wrestlers. Int J Sports Med. 18:47–55.[Medline]
  12. Shuman WP, Newell-Morris LL, Leonetti DL, et al. 1986 Abnormal body fat distribution by CT in diabetic men. Invest Radiol. 21:483–487.[Medline]
  13. Gray DS, Fujioka K, Colletti PM, et al. 1991 Magnetic-resonance imaging used for determining fat distribution in obesity and diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr. 54:623–627.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Bonora E, Moghetti P, Zancanaro C, et al. 1989 Estimates of in vivo insulin action in man: comparison of insulin tolerance tests with euglycaemic and hyperglycaemic glucose clamp studies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 68:374–378.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Ciqual. 1991 Répertoire général des aliments. Fédération Française de Nutrition, INRA; Paris: Lavoisier.
  16. Baecke JAH, Burema J, Frijters JER. 1981 A short questionnaire for the measurement of habitual physical activity in epidemiological studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 36:932–942.
  17. Astrand PO, Rythning I. 1954 A nomogram for calculation of aerobic capacity (physical fitness) from pulse rate during submaximal work. J Appl Physiol. 7:218–221.[Free Full Text]
  18. Weir JB. 1949 New method for calculating metabolic rate with special reference to protein metabolism. J Physiol. 109:1–9.
  19. Mourier A, Gautier JF, de Kerviler E, et al. 1997 Mobilization of visceral adipose tissue related to the improvement in insulin sensitivity in response to physical training in NIDDM. Effects of branched-chain amino acid supplements. Diabetes Care. 20:385–391.[Abstract]
  20. Durnin JVGA, Womersley J. 1974 Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 years. Br J Nutr. 32:77–92.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Bergmeyer HU. 1974 Methods of enzymatic analysis. New York: Academic Press.
  22. Ho PJ. 1974 Radiochemical assay of long chain fatty acids using 63 N as tracer. Anal Biochem. 36:105–113.
  23. Ross R, Shaw KD, Rissanen J, Martel Y, de Guise J, Avruch L. 1994 Sex differences in lean and adipose tissue distribution by magnetic resonance imaging: anthropometric relationships. Am J Clin Nutr. 59:1277–1285.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Akinmokun A, Selby PL, Ramaiya K, Alberti KGMM. 1992 The short insulin tolerance test for determination of insulin sensitivity: a comparison with the euglycaemic clamp. Diabetic Med. 9:432–437.[Medline]
  25. Gelding SV, Robinson S, Lowe S, Nithtlyananthan R, Johnson DG. 1994 Validation of the low dose short insulin tolerance test for evaluation of insulin sensitivity. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 40:611–615.[Medline]
  26. Hirst S, Phillips DIW, Vines SK, Clark PM, Hales CN. 1993 Reproducibility of the short insulin tolerance test. Diabetic Med. 10:839–842.[Medline]
  27. Scheen AJ, Paquot N, Castillo MJ, Lefèbvre PJ. 1994 How to measure insulin action in vivo. Diabetes Metab Rev. 10:151–188.[Medline]
  28. Ross R, Fortier L, Hudson R. 1996 Separate associations between visceral and adipose tissue distribution, insulin and glucose levels in obese women. Diabetes Care. 19:1404–1411.[Abstract]
  29. Abate N, Garg A, Peshock RM, Stray-Gundersen J, Grundy SM. 1995 Relationships of generalized and regional adiposity to insulin sensitivity in men. J Clin Invest. 96:88–98.
  30. Banerji MA, Chaiken RL, Gordon D, Kral JG, Lebovitz HE. 1995 Does intra- or abdominal adipose tissue in black men determine whether NIDDM is insulin-resistant or insulin-sensitive? Diabetes. 44:141–146.[Abstract]
  31. Abate N, Garg A, Peshock RM, Stray-Gundersen J, Adams-Huet B, Grundy SM. 1996 Relationship of generalized and regional adiposity to insulin sensitivity in men with NIDDM. Diabetes. 45:1684–1693.[Abstract]
  32. Fried SK, Leidel RL, Edens NK, Kral JG. 1993 Lipolysis in intraabdominal adipose tissue of obese women and men. Obes Res. 1:443–448.[Medline]
  33. Lönnqvist F, Thorne A, Nilsell K, Hoffstedt J, Arner P. 1995 A pathogenic role of visceral fat ß3-adrenoceptors in obesity. J Clin Invest. 95:1109–1116.
  34. Després JP, Pouliot MC, Moorjani S, et al. 1991 Loss of abdominal fat and metabolic response to exercise training in obese women. Am J Physiol. 261:E159–E167.
  35. Boden G. 1996 Perspective in diabetes. Role of fatty acids in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance and NIDDM. Diabetes. 45:3–10.
  36. Boden G, Chen X. 1995 Effects of fat on glucose uptake and utilization in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes J Clin Invest. 96:1261–1268.
  37. Peiris AN, Hennes MI, Evans DJ, Wilson CR, Lee MB, Kissebah AH. 1987 Relationship of anthropometric measurements of body fat distribution to metabolic profile in premenopausa women. In: Björntorp P, Smith U, Lonnroth P, eds. Health implications of reginal obesity. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell; 179–188.
  38. Pouliot MC, Després JP, Lemieux S, et al. 1994 Waist circumference and abdominal sagittal diameter: best simple anthropometric indexes of abdominal visceral adipose tissue accumulation and related cardiovascular risk in men and women. Am J Cardiol. 73:460–468.[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Han TS, Van Leer EM, Seidell JC, Lean MEJ. 1995 Waist circumference action levels in the identification of cardiovascular risk factors: prevalence study in a random sample. Br Med J. 311:1401–1405.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Clausen JO, Borch-Johnsen K, Iben H, Bergman RN, Hougaard P, Winther K. 1996 Insulin sensitiviy index, acute insulin response and glucose effectiveness in a population-based sample of 380 young healthy caucasians. J Clin Invest. 98:1195–1209.[Medline]
  41. Karter AJ, Mayer-Davis EJ, Selby JV, et al. 1996 Insulin sensitivity and abdominal obesity in african-american, hispanic and non-hispanic white men and women. Diabetes. 45:1547–1555.[Abstract]
  42. Young TK, Gelskey E. 1995 Is noncentral obesity metabolically benign? JAMA. 274:1939–1941.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Van Der Koy K, Leenen R, Seidell JC, Deurenberg P, Droop A, Bakker CJG. 1993 Waist-to-hip ratio is a poor predictor of changes in visceral fat. Am J Clin Nutr. 57:327–333.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
K. Gross, I. Karagiannides, T. Thomou, H. W. Koon, C. Bowe, H. Kim, N. Giorgadze, T. Tchkonia, T. Pirtskhalava, J. L. Kirkland, et al.
Substance P promotes expansion of human mesenteric preadipocytes through proliferative and antiapoptotic pathways
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, May 1, 2009; 296(5): G1012 - G1019.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
E. Somm, V. M. Schwitzgebel, D. M. Vauthay, E. J. Camm, C. Y. Chen, J.-P. Giacobino, S. V. Sizonenko, M. L. Aubert, and P. S. Huppi
Prenatal Nicotine Exposure Alters Early Pancreatic Islet and Adipose Tissue Development with Consequences on the Control of Body Weight and Glucose Metabolism Later in Life
Endocrinology, December 1, 2008; 149(12): 6289 - 6299.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
J. G. Ray MD MSc, A. P. Mohllajee MPH, R. M. van Dam PhD, and K. B. Michels ScD PhD
Breast size and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus
Can. Med. Assoc. J., January 29, 2008; 178(3): 289 - 295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
K. Azuma, L. K. Heilbronn, J. B. Albu, S. R. Smith, E. Ravussin, D. E. Kelley, and and the Look AHEAD Adipose Research Group
Adipose tissue distribution in relation to insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes mellitus
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, July 1, 2007; 293(1): E435 - E442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
K. A. Virtanen, P. Iozzo, K. Hallsten, R. Huupponen, R. Parkkola, T. Janatuinen, F. Lonnqvist, T. Viljanen, T. Ronnemaa, P. Lonnroth, et al.
Increased Fat Mass Compensates for Insulin Resistance in Abdominal Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes: A Positron-Emitting Tomography Study
Diabetes, September 1, 2005; 54(9): 2720 - 2726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
I. Giannopoulou, L. L. Ploutz-Snyder, R. Carhart, R. S. Weinstock, B. Fernhall, S. Goulopoulou, and J. A. Kanaley
Exercise Is Required for Visceral Fat Loss in Postmenopausal Women with Type 2 Diabetes
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2005; 90(3): 1511 - 1518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
C. S. Fox, N. L. Heard-Costa, P. W.F. Wilson, D. Levy, R. B. D'Agostino Sr., and L. D. Atwood
Genome-Wide Linkage to Chromosome 6 for Waist Circumference in the Framingham Heart Study
Diabetes, May 1, 2004; 53(5): 1399 - 1402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
F. Mauvais-Jarvis, E. Sobngwi, R. Porcher, J.-P. Riveline, J.-P. Kevorkian, C. Vaisse, G. Charpentier, P.-J. Guillausseau, P. Vexiau, and J.-F. Gautier
Ketosis-Prone Type 2 Diabetes in Patients of Sub-Saharan African Origin: Clinical Pathophysiology and Natural History of {beta}-Cell Dysfunction and Insulin Resistance
Diabetes, March 1, 2004; 53(3): 645 - 653.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
J. Q. Purnell, R. K. Dev, M. W. Steffes, P. A. Cleary, J. P. Palmer, I. B. Hirsch, J. E. Hokanson, and J. D. Brunzell
Relationship of Family History of Type 2 Diabetes, Hypoglycemia, and Autoantibodies to Weight Gain and Lipids With Intensive and Conventional Therapy in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial
Diabetes, October 1, 2003; 52(10): 2623 - 2629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
Y. Miyazaki, L. Glass, C. Triplitt, E. Wajcberg, L. J. Mandarino, and R. A. DeFronzo
Abdominal fat distribution and peripheral and hepatic insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes mellitus
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, December 1, 2002; 283(6): E1135 - E1143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Arfai, P. D. Pitukcheewanont, M. I. Goran, C. J. Tavare, L. Heller, and V. Gilsanz
Bone, Muscle, and Fat: Sex-related Differences in Prepubertal Children
Radiology, August 1, 2002; 224(2): 338 - 344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Verma, C. M. Boney, R. Tucker, and B. R. Vohr
Insulin Resistance Syndrome in Women with Prior History of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2002; 87(7): 3227 - 3235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
C. J. de Souza, M. Eckhardt, K. Gagen, M. Dong, W. Chen, D. Laurent, and B. F. Burkey
Effects of Pioglitazone on Adipose Tissue Remodeling Within the Setting of Obesity and Insulin Resistance
Diabetes, August 1, 2001; 50(8): 1863 - 1871.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
Y. Bando, Y. Ushiogi, K. Okafuji, D. Toya, N. Tanaka, and M. Fujisawa
The Relationship of Fasting Plasma Glucose Values and Other Variables to 2-h Postload Plasma Glucose in Japanese Subjects
Diabetes Care, July 1, 2001; 24(7): 1156 - 1160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. Hadigan, C. Corcoran, T. Stanley, S. Piecuch, A. Klibanski, and S. Grinspoon
Fasting Hyperinsulinemia in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Men: Relationship to Body Composition, Gonadal Function, and Protease Inhibitor Use
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2000; 85(1): 35 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gautier, J.-F.
Right arrow Articles by Cathelineau, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gautier, J.-F.
Right arrow Articles by Cathelineau, G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals