help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhengwei, Y.
Right arrow Articles by McLachlan, R. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhengwei, Y.
Right arrow Articles by McLachlan, R. I.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 83, No. 4 1284-1291
Copyright © 1998 by The Endocrine Society


Original Articles

Stereological Evaluation of Human Spermatogenesis after Suppression by Testosterone Treatment: Heterogeneous Pattern of Spermatogenic Impairment1

Yang Zhengwei, Nigel G. Wreford, Peter Royce, David M. de Kretser and Robert I. McLachlan

Prince Henry’s Institute of Medical Research (Y.Z., R.I.M.) and the Institute of Reproduction and Development (N.G.W., D.M.d.K.), Monash Medical Center, and the Department of Anatomy, Monash University (N.G.W.), Clayton, Victoria 3168; and the Department of Surgery, Monash University, Inner and Eastern Health Care Group, Alfred Hospital (P.R.), Prahran 3181, Australia

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. R. I. McLachlan, Prince Henry’s Institute of Medical Research, P.O. Box 5152, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia. E-mail: Rob.MacLachlan{at}med.monash.edu.au

Abstract

Testosterone (T) treatment suppresses gonadotropin levels in normal men and is a promising reversible contraceptive that induces azoospermia in approximately 70% of subjects and oligospermia in the remainder; however, the basis of this variable response is unclear. This study aimed to investigate this reported variable response by examining the spermatogenic process and quantitating germ cell number in men after T-induced gonadotropin withdrawal. Ten normal fertile men (31–46 yr), already planning to undergo vasectomy, either received T enanthate (200 mg, im, weekly) for 19–24 weeks (n = 5; TE group) or proceeded directly to surgery (n = 5; controls), at which time a unilateral testicular biopsy was taken, and germ cell numbers were estimated using the optical disector stereological method. In response to TE treatment, serum T levels rose 2-fold, and FSH/LH levels became undetectable. Sperm counts fell to azoospermia in 4 men and to 21 million/mL in the fifth man. The mean number of type A spermatogonia per 100 Sertoli cells was unchanged, but type B spermatogonia fell markedly to 10% of the control values, and later germ cell types decreased to 11–18% of the control values. The pattern of germ cell suppression varied widely and showed no relationship with sperm count or the time to azoospermia. Despite the presence of elongated spermatids (1.4–20% of the control), four men remained azoospermic. Two TE subjects with similar early germ cell complements and elongated spermatid numbers had sperm counts of zero and 21 million/mL; the latter man demonstrated marked variability in germ cell numbers between adjacent tubules. We conclude that 1) the principal spermatogenic lesion in TE-treated men is the marked (90%) inhibition of type A->B spermatogonial maturation. Other sites are also affected, particularly the release and/or survival of elongated spermatids during transit; and 2) a steady state in germ cell number may not be established even after 4–5 months of TE treatment. The findings suggest that TE treatment does not adequately or consistently withdraw hormonal support for spermatogenesis, leading to variable between- and within-individual patterns of germ cell suppression.

IT HAS LONG been recognized that exogenous testosterone (T) treatment, alone or in combination with progestins, reduces sperm counts in men as a result of gonadotropin suppression (1, 2, 3, 4). After the successful use of estrogen/progestins for female contraception in the 1970s, treatment with T, alone or in combination with progestins, was considered as a potential male hormonal contraceptive strategy for the effective and reversible suppression of spermatogenesis (5, 6, 7, 8, 9).

In the presence of gonadotropin suppression, T treatment is essential to prevent the loss of libido and virilization. T enanthate (TE), administered weekly at a dose of 200 mg, im, suppressed serum gonadotropin levels and induced oligo- or azoospermia in almost all subjects (5, 8). The TE alone strategy was further investigated in studies organized through the WHO (10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15). Azoospermia was induced in 40–90% of subjects, and there was a varying degree of spermatogenic suppression seen within and between racial groups (10, 15). The basis for the different responses was unclear and not explicable on the basis of T pharmacokinetics (14) or anthropometric measures, leading to the conclusion that intrinsic differences in the spermatogenic process must underlie this heterogeneous response (12).

Although many animal studies have examined the effects of gonadotropin withdrawal on the spermatogenic process (16), this issue has not been well studied in men treated with androgens/progestins. Spermatogenesis has been reported to be suppressed to the level of spermatogonia in T-treated men based on qualitative light microscopy (3, 4, 7, 17, 18, 19). However, the pattern was not always uniform in the small number of subjects studied. Certainly no quantitative studies of germ cell populations have been performed, and as a consequence, the site(s) in the spermatogenic process inhibited by the treatment is unclear.

In the present study, we have used an unbiased and efficient stereological technique, the optical disector, to estimate the number of germ cells in testicular biopsy tissue after 19–24 weeks of TE treatment. We show that germ cell numbers are greatly reduced and that the major spermatogenic lesion is in type A->B spermatogonial development. However lesions also exists in the maturation of spermatids and in the release and/or survival during transit of elongated spermatids. Finally, the pattern of germ cell suppression varies widely both between men and within individuals. Several concepts emerge that may assist in understanding the basis of this heterogeneous pattern of response and the morphological basis of the variable clinical responses to T-based contraception.

Subjects and Methods

Subjects

Ten normal men presenting for vasectomy were recruited for a study in which they were to undergo testicular biopsy at the time of surgery for the evaluation of testicular morphology. The men were 38.2 ± 1.7 yr of age (range, 31–46 yr) and had fathered one to four children. The men had no history of significant illness or medication. General and testicular examination were normal, and testicular volume was determined using ultrasound. The men had at least two normal semen analyses using WHO criteria (20). Finally, the subjects all had normal serum T, LH, FSH, and PRL levels; fasting lipids; liver function tests; prostate-specific antigen; and full blood examination, except for one man (T2) with a modestly elevated serum FSH level. The study was approved by the human ethics committee of both the Monash Medical Center and the Alfred Healthcare Group, and informed consent was obtained from each subject.

Design

Five men received TE [Primotestin depot, Schering Australia; 200 mg (0.8 mL), im, weekly] for 19–24 weeks before surgery (TE group; subjects T1–T5). The remaining five men served as controls (subjects C1–C5) and proceeded directly to surgery. Pretreatment clinical characteristics, semen analyses, and endocrine parameters (Table 1Go) did not differ between TE and control groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Endocrine data in control and TE-treated men

 
Semen analyses were performed every 1–6 weeks during TE treatment; in addition, semen smears were made for the immunocytological determination of immature spermatids as we previously described (21). In four TE-treated subjects, sperm number was eventually reduced either to azoospermia or to a degree where only an occasional sperm was seen in a concentrated sample (<<0.1 million/mL), making quantification of sperm count impossible. For the purposes of description, all of these samples are described as being azoospermic.

Serum T and gonadotropin levels were assessed after 11–13 weeks of TE treatment. Immediately before surgery (after 19–24 weeks of TE treatment), testicular volume was again measured using ultrasound, and a blood sample was taken for T, FSH, LH, and inhibin B levels. All blood samples were taken at random times in relation to TE injections.

Testicular biopsy and tissue processing

A single testicular biopsy was obtained from one testis after incision of the tunica. Great care was taken to avoid compression of the testis so as to minimize disruption of the testicular architecture. Each biopsy (200–500 mg) was immersion fixed in Bouin’s fluid for about 3–5 h and then observed under a dissecting microscope. Under direct vision, the biopsy was divided in two along a plane lying at right angles to the dominant tubule orientation. One piece was then further processed and embedded in hydroxyethyl-methacrylate resin (Technovit 7100, Kulzer Co., Friedrichsdorf, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A 25-µm-thick section with an average area of about 22 mm2 was cut from each block using a Supercut microtome (Reichert Jung 2050, Nossloch, Germany), stained with periodic acid-Schiff’s reagent, and counterstained with hematoxylin. Thin 2- to 3-µm sections were prepared in a similar way for micrography.

Immunocytochemical determination of immature spermatids in semen

Semen samples were washed in phosphate-buffered saline (0.01 mol/L; pH 7.2), and smears were immunostained using monoclonal antibodies against the human intraacrosomal antigen SP-10 (SP-10-3 mAbs) (Virginia Biotech, VI) and the human leukocyte common antigen CD45 (T29/33, Dako, Carpenteria, CA) to allow the identification of immature (round) spermatids and leukocytes as previously described (21).

Tubule diameter and epithelial appearance

An approach was used similar to that previously described for the quantitative assessment of primate spermatogenesis (22). Tubule cross-sections, with an elliptical profile and either a clear lumen or a central cytoplasmic area, were sampled, as such features indicate that a complete tubule cross-section is represented. The short axis (tubule diameter) was measured. The presence of spermatocytes or spermatids in each tubule profile was recorded.

Estimation of germ and Sertoli cell number

Germ cells and Sertoli cells were identified based on their nuclear morphology (23, 24, 25, 26). Germ cells were grouped as follows: type A spermatogonia; type B spermatogonia; preleptotene, leptotene, and zygotene (Pl-Z) primary spermatocytes; pachytene (P) primary spermatocytes (including secondary spermatocytes); step 1–2 round spermatids and step 3–6 elongating spermatids, using the terminology of Sharpe (27), which equate to Sa and Sb+Sc classes as described by Clermont (23, 24, 25); and step 7–8 (Sd) late elongated spermatids.

Germ cell and Sertoli number were estimated using the optical disector technique (28, 29) as previously described for the monkey testis (22). In brief, germ and Sertoli cell nuclei or nucleoli were counted in thick methacrylate sections by superimposing a computer-generated unbiased counting frame on a video image of the section. The objective (Olympus Splan Apo x100, Olympus Corp., Lake Purchase, NY) used had a high numerical aperture (NA=1.4), which gives a very short depth of focus. Using this objective, a known depth within the section was optically sectioned, and nuclei or nucleoli were counted according to a three-dimensional counting rule (28) as they came into sharp focus. Displacement in the z-axis was monitored using a microcator (Heidenhain, Tranreut, Germany) with its sensor monitoring the stage movement; this instrument measures displacement with an accuracy of less 0.5 µm.

Germ cell data are primarily expressed on a per 100 Sertoli cells but also on a per mm3 tubule basis. Finally, data are also expressed on a per testis basis using the testicular volume; however, these calculations assume that no significant artifacts in testicular architecture were induced by the biopsy procedure.

Estimation of Sertoli cell nuclear volume

This was determined using a stereological approach: local vertical sections (30) according to an unbiased and efficient stereological principle, the rotator (31). Fifty Sertoli cell nuclei were sampled [by the optical disector (29)] and measured per testis (32).

Endocrine hormone assays

Serum LH and FSH were measured using enzyme-linked immunoassays [Imx LH, Abbott (North Chicago, IL), and AIA-Pack, TOSOH (Tokyo, Japan), respectively], both with sensitivities of 1 IU/L and with between- and within-assay coefficients of variation of 6.7% and 5.5%, and 5.9% and 4.0%, respectively. As serum FSH was suppressed below this level of detection during T treatment, serum taken at the time of surgery was also analyzed using the Axysym assay method (Abbott), with a detection limit of 0.1 IU/L.

Serum T was measured by RIA using a rabbit T antibody and iodinated histamine-T as tracer. The within- and between-assay coefficients of variation were 6% and 12%, and the working range was 0.3–58 nmol/L. High value samples were assayed at dilution.

Serum inhibin B levels were measured with a two-site enzyme-linked immunoassay, using plates coated with an antibody to the ßB-subunit and a second antibody against the {alpha}-subunit, conjugated to alkaline phosphatase (33). This assay had a sensitivity of 6 pg/mL, and all samples were run in the same assay.

Statistics

Data are shown as the mean ± SEM (n = 5/group). Statistical comparison of data from control and TE-treated men was performed (using Sigmastat V1.0, Jandel Scientific Software, San Rafael, CA), using t test or Mann-Whitney rank sum test, when normality or equal variance test failed.

Results

Endocrinology

Serum T, FSH, LH, and inhibin B levels in the control and TE groups are shown in Table 1Go. No differences were seen in the baseline data between groups. After TE treatment for 11–13 weeks, serum T levels increased 2-fold to 43.5 ± 7.8 nmol/L, and serum FSH and LH levels were all at or below the limits of assay detection (<1.0 IU/L).

At the time of surgery (19–24 weeks of TE), the mean serum T level was 63.2 ± 12 nmol/L. Serum FSH levels were borderline detectable in two TE-treated subjects (T3 and T4) using the second, more sensitive assay system.

Serum inhibin B levels were suppressed to 65% of control values (P < 0.05) by TE treatment and were clearly detectable in all subjects.

Semen analysis

Semen volumes were 4.4 ± 1.2 and 3.0 ± 0.5 mL in control and TE groups, respectively, and did not change during TE treatment. Baseline sperm counts were 132 ± 49 and 130 ± 50 million/mL (P = NS) in control and TE-treated groups, respectively (Fig. 1Go). In response to TE treatment, azoospermia was induced in four of the five subjects; however, one subject (T4) had a sperm density of 21 million/mL (his pretreatment sperm density was 317 million/mL) after 19 weeks of TE treatment.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Log-transformed sperm concentrations (million per mL) before (week 0) and after TE treatment in each subject in the TE group (T1–T5).

 
A few immature spermatids could be identified in the semen smears of some control and TE-treated men (0–1.5 million/mL; data not shown). In response to TE treatment, the number of immature spermatids (either absolute or relative to the number of sperm in the ejaculate) fell; they were absent in all azoospermic samples. Only occasional CD45-immunopositive leukocytes were seen, and their presence was not related to treatment (data not shown).

Testicular morphology

Baseline testicular volumes were not significantly different in the control and TE groups (20.6 ± 4.0 and 16.7 ± 2.5 cm3, respectively). After 19–24 weeks of TE treatment, testis volume decreased by a mean of 28% (range, 8–41%), and tubule diameter decreased to 67% of the control value (138 ± 8.1 compared with 205 ± 3.0 µm; P < 0.05).

Germ cell numbers

Mean data. Germ cell data for control and TE-treated men are considered on a per 100 Sertoli cells basis (Table 2Go and Fig. 2aGo); however, the data are also shown per mm3 tubule and per testis (Table 2Go). The number of type A spermatogonia did not change in response to TE treatment on a per Sertoli cell or per testis basis, whereas the apparent doubling in type A spermatogonial and Sertoli cell number per mm3 tubule reflects the reduction in tubule diameter and, hence, volume.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Germ cell numbers in control and TE-treated men

 


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Germ cell numbers. a, Mean ± SD of the TE group, expressed as a percentage of the mean control value (n = 5 each group); b–f, individual TE-treated subject values also shown as a percentage of control levels. The x-axis describes the different germ cell types: A, type A spermatogonia; B, type B spermatogonia; Pl-Z, preleptotene to zygotene spermatocytes; P, pachytene spermatocytes; rST(1–2), step 1–2 round spermatids; eST(3–6), step 3–6 elongating spermatids; eST(7–8), step 7–8 elongated spermatids. A broken line is drawn between step 7–8 spermatid numbers and the sperm density in the ejaculate; the latter is less than 0.1 million/mL in all cases except subject T4.

 
In contrast, there was a marked reduction in type B spermatogonial number (to 9.8% of the control value) when expressed per 100 Sertoli cells. Similar reductions were seen in the mean number of later germ cell types: Pl-Z spermatocytes (13.1%), pachytene spermatocytes (18.1%), step 1–2 round spermatids (14.9%), step 3–6 elongating spermatids (6.2%), and step 7–8 (17.3%) elongated spermatids, with the total number of all spermatocytes plus all spermatids reduced to 13.2% of the control value.

A ratio was made between the number of step 3–6 spermatids per 100 Sertoli cells and the number of step 1–2 forms as an index of the efficiency of transition through spermiogenesis. This ratio was significantly reduced in TE-treated men compared with controls (0.38 ± 0.13 vs. 0.95 ± 0.28; P < 0.01). On the other hand, the ratio of step 7–8 spermatids to step 3–6 forms was significantly higher in TE-treated men (2.42 ± 1.94 vs. 0.64 ± 0.23; P < 0.05).

Individual data. Although in all cases a marked reduction in type B spermatogonia and later germ cells types was apparent, there was considerable variability in the extent of suppression of type B spermatogonial and later germ cell number between individuals (Fig. 2Go, b–f). Furthermore, there was no clear relationship between 1) sperm counts and the site and degree of spermatogenic inhibition, and 2) germ cell numbers and the time required to achieve a sperm count below 0.1 million/mL. Specific features include the following.

Relationship between germ cell numbers and time to azoospermia: In subjects T1 and T2 (Fig. 2Go, b and c), similarly marked reductions in type B spermatogonia and all later germ cell numbers were seen despite their times to azoospermia differing markedly (21 vs. 8 weeks, respectively). Subject T3 (Fig. 2dGo) achieved azoospermia within 6 weeks of TE treatment, yet his total spermatocyte and spermatid populations were 2–4 times greater than those of T1, who did not achieve azoospermia until 21 weeks.

Variability in germ cell complement within azoospermic men: Subjects T2 and T3 (Fig. 2Go, c and d) were rendered azoospermic over a similar time course (6–8 weeks); however, total spermatocytes and spermatid numbers were 32- and 14-fold greater in T3, respectively.

Correlation between sperm and germ cell counts: Subject T4 showed suppression to 21 million/mL (~7% of his baseline) consistent with the persistence of about 25% control levels of spermatocytes and spermatids, yet similar precursor cells numbers (including elongated spermatids) were seen in subject T5 who was azoospermic (by 15 weeks).

Presence of elongated spermatids in the testes of azoospermic men: In the four azoospermic men (T1–T3 and T5), elongated spermatids persisted in the testis at 1.4–20% of control levels.

Presence of spermatocyte/spermatid numbers greater than type B spermatogonia: In subjects T1 and T3, there was a virtual absence of type B spermatogonia, yet greater populations of later germ cell types were seen, e.g. step 1–6 spermatids were 3.3% and 10.5% of the control value, respectively (Fig. 2Go, b and d).

Heterogeneity between tubules within men: In all TE-treated men, tubule diameter and lumen were marked reduced compared to control values (Fig. 3Go). In two azoospermic men (T1 and T2), most tubule profiles contained predominantly Sertoli cells and spermatogonia (Fig. 3BGo); however, there was marked heterogeneity, in that 76% and 14%, respectively, of tubule profiles showed at least some spermatocytes and/or spermatids (Fig. 3CGo). In the two remaining azoospermic subjects (T3 and T5), more than 97% of tubule profiles contained spermatocytes and/or spermatids (Fig. 3DGo). Even in the subject (T4) with a sperm density of 21 million/mL, a few tubules containing only Sertoli cells and spermatogonia were seen juxtaposed to tubules showing only mild hypospermatogenesis (not shown).



View larger version (132K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Light micrographs taken with a x10 objective lens on 3-µm-thick methacrylate-embedded sections. a, Control (subject C1), showing a normal tubule lumen and spermatogenesis. b, TE subject (T1), showing reduced tubule diameters with very small lumens. The two centrally placed tubules show marked regression and contain predominantly Sertoli cells and spermatogonia; c, TE subject (T1), showing heterogeneity between tubules, with the left tubule showing occasional spermatids, whereas the right tubule contains only Sertoli cells and spermatogonia. d, TE subject (T3) who was azoospermic, showing occasional tubules containing spermatocytes and elongated spermatids. Scale bar = 50 µm.

 
Sertoli cell parameters

The total Sertoli cell number per testis was not affected by TE treatment (Table 2Go). In response to TE treatment, the Sertoli cell number per mm3 tubule was significantly (P < 0.05) increased. Sertoli cell nuclear volume was significantly (P < 0.05) reduced by 22% after TE treatment (260 ± 29 compared to 332 ± 25 µm3 in controls).

Discussion

T-based contraceptive treatments induce azoospermia in approximately 70% of Caucasian men, whereas the remainder have variable degrees of oligospermia and may remain fertile (10, 11). This heterogeneous response remains unexplained as both azoo- and oligospermic men show similar T pharmacokinetics and degrees of gonadotropin suppression, leading to the speculation that intrinsic differences exist in the sensitivity of the spermatogenic process to hormonal withdrawal between men (12). The degree of spermatogenic suppression in such studies was assessed using sperm counts that, although representing a useful indicator of overall spermatogenic response and fertility potential, cannot contribute to the understanding of the process by which spermatogenesis is variably affected by T treatment.

In this study we used open testicular biopsy and modern stereological approaches to estimate germ cell number so as to identify the site(s) of inhibition of the spermatogenic process in normal men undergoing T-based contraceptive treatment as previously described (10, 11). Our study is the first for two decades to describe the effects of androgen-induced gonadotropin withdrawal on the human testis. Earlier descriptive studies used nonquantitative assessments to conclude that the seminiferous epithelium regressed to the spermatogonial stage in response to a range of steroids, including medroxyprogesterone acetate alone (34) or with T (18), or combinations of danazol and T (35).

We have shown that the most consistent lesion induced by T treatment is the reduction of type B spermatogonial number to about 10% of the control value. Even though the total number of A spermatogonia remained unchanged, it is not possible to conclude whether the reduction in B forms was due to a reduction in the final division of type A spermatogonia and/or to the loss of type B forms. Inhibition of spermatogonial division may still be occurring, but may involve only a small fraction of the Apale subclass and, therefore, may not be apparent when all type A forms are pooled during quantification. Improved methods of spermatogonial identification and categorization are required to address this issue. We observed a similarly striking reduction in type B spermatogonial number in response to GnRH antagonist-induced gonadotropin withdrawal in primates (36).

Our data make it clear that other spermatogenic sites are also affected. In TE-treated men, the relatively greater decline in step 3–6 compared to step 1–2 spermatid number suggests a reduced efficiency of midspermiogenic maturation, like that seen in rodents (37), although to a lesser degree. More striking, however, was the relative excess of step 7–8 compared to step 3–6 spermatids, suggesting that elongated spermatids accumulate in the epithelium due to their impaired release. All TE-treated men had elongated spermatids present in the epithelium, yet in only one case did they appear in the ejaculate. Oligospermia induced by medroxyprogesterone acetate (34) or combinations of danazol and T (35) has been reported to be associated with an increase in round (immature) spermatids in the semen, suggesting that spermatid sloughing may be part of the mechanism of T-induced spermatogenic failure, as clearly shown in rats (37). However, we did not observe any increase in immature spermatids in this study or in a previous one involving treatment with T plus progestins (21).

There was a highly variable pattern of response seen between men in terms of both the timing of onset of azoospermia and the degree of spermatogenic inhibition. Finally, we noted striking differences in spermatogenic status between tubules within the same individual, an observation that would remain unrecognized if only assessing the response using semen analysis. Such heterogeneity also underlines the need to use a systematic uniform random sampling scheme when undertaking quantitative studies (32).

The between-individual heterogeneity requires further discussion. In two men (T1 and T2), the germ cell patterns were consistent with a severe lesion at the B spermatogonial stage and normal subsequent progression up to the elongated spermatid stage, but then a failure of these to appear in the ejaculate. A more striking example of late spermiogenic failure was seen when comparing two other men (T4 and T5). They had a similar and more modest reduction in type B number (~25% control), and their subsequent germ cell progression was again normal up to the elongated spermatid stage, but there was a total failure of their appearance in the ejaculate in T5, whereas T4 achieved a sperm density of 21 million/mL.

Finally, the data from subject T3 suggests that a steady state of germ cell development had not been reached despite 5 months of T treatment (or ~2 spermatogenic cycles). He had very few type B spermatogonia (<1%), yet his spermatocyte and spermatid numbers remained 11–27% of the control value. The only explanation for this pattern would be that a steady state had not yet been achieved and that a late-onset severe depletion in type B would shortly flow on to reduce these later cell types. This proposition is supported by the clinical observation that a substantial proportion of men who are oligospermic after 4–6 months of T treatment alone do, in fact, become azoospermic over the next 6 months (11).

These different patterns of response did not relate to the time to azoospermia or the degree of suppression of inhibin B (as a marker of Sertoli cell function). Inhibin B levels were suppressed by about one third, similar to those reported by Anawalt et al. (33), but were clearly detectable in all subjects, underlining the gonadotropin independence of a substantial proportion of inhibin B secretion in men. Serum FSH levels were at or below the limit of assay sensitivity in the four azoospermic men, but were just detectable in subject T4, with 21 million/mL sperm count. Whether a low persistent level of FSH in any way was contributing to his continued spermatogenesis is a moot point.

The optical disector stereological approach is an unbiased method unaffected by the shape of cells or nuclei/nucleoli. In our animal studies we expressed our data on a per testis basis, as the reference volume of the testis was determined and the biopsies were taken from multiple sites after fixation. Obviously this was not possible in the current study, and we, therefore, expressed germ cell number per 100 Sertoli cells based on the assumption that Sertoli cell number was not affected by treatment. The validity of this assumption has been tested in the GnRH-deficient primate (36) and in rats (38). Nonetheless, we also cautiously expressed the data per testis and in doing so have assumed that the biopsy was not subject to significant distortion or shrinkage (particularly the tubule/interstitial relationship) during collection and processing. Our estimate of total Sertoli cell number per testis (~760 million) is about half that reported by Cortes et al. (1350 million) (39), but is in reasonable agreement with that reported by Johnson et al. (500 million) (40).

The approach to sampling the human testis was necessarily limited to the use of a single open biopsy. The human testis is comprised of 200–300 lobules, each containing 1–3 highly coiled tubules approximately 70–80 cm in length. We estimate that at most we would have sectioned through 6 individual tubules. However, it is impossible to determine the origin of any particular tubule profile or its relationship to adjacent tubules. Accordingly, one cannot conclude whether the variable degree of spermatogenic inhibition seen in adjacent profiles is due to the persistence of spermatogenesis in one entire tubule or arises from patchy maintenance within several tubules.

How can a variable spermatogenic state exist between tubules or across tubules within one man in whom the endocrine signals ought be identical? Even the proposition that the paracrine environment might vary so substantially between adjacent tubules seems difficult to sustain. Although not being able to directly address the mechanism of this heterogeneity, one can speculate that such a pattern might be produced when the withdrawal of the hormonal support for spermatogenesis achieved using the TE alone protocol is a borderline effective approach. In an analogous fashion to a chemotherapeutic action on tumor cells, the use of a borderline effective treatment will result in a range of responses within a presumably monoclonally derived cell population, i.e. cells may be killed, cease dividing (temporarily or permanently), or be unresponsive. In the case of spermatogenesis, it should not be surprising that some tubule sections or Sertoli/germ cell units can continue to function while the process ceases in adjacent areas. With the passage of time, some regions adapt to provide long term sperm production (persistent oligospermia), whereas spermatogenesis in other regions ultimately collapses.

To extend the analogy with chemotherapy further, the more effective the treatment, the more rapid and consistent the outcome, e.g. the use of combination chemotherapies. Indeed, in contraception, the use of T in combination with other agents, such as GnRH antagonists (41) and progestins (42, 43, 44), has been reported to achieve a more consistent and rapid induction of azoospermia. In the rat, the inclusion of the androgen receptor antagonist, flutamide, with a GnRH antagonist results in the accelerated depletion of elongated spermatids (45). The common feature of these approaches is the more rapid and profound suppression of gonadotropin levels and/or the inhibition of residual androgen action within the testis.

The nonhomogeneity of the human testis is also apparent from the recent demonstration that elongated spermatids can be isolated from open testicular biopsy in men with spermatogenic failure in whom thorough conventional histology reveals the pattern of the Sertoli cell only syndrome or germ cell arrest at the spermatocyte stage (46). Clearly, whatever genetic/environmental damage exists does not apply evenly throughout the testis. It has been suggested that the isolation of sperm from men with severe hypospermatogenesis in whom some elongated spermatids are seen indicates that their azoospermia results from a coexistent obstructive lesion. Our data in the T-treated man clearly shows that azoospermia can result from the failure of elongated spermatids to be released and/or to survive transit into the ejaculate. The mechanism of this failure requires further study.

In conclusion, we have shown that the principal spermatogenic lesion in TE-treated men is the inhibition of type A->B spermatogonial maturation; however, other sites are affected, particularly the release and/or survival of elongated spermatids. The wide variability in the timing and degree of germ cell depletion suggests that TE treatment does not lead to a steady state even after 5 months of TE treatment. We speculate that TE treatment fails to provide effective and consistent withdrawal of hormonal support for spermatogenesis, which, in turn, leads to the variable between- and within-individual patterns of germ cell suppression.

Acknowledgments

June Lee is thanked for her assistance in conducting many aspects of the study, Ms. J. Spaliviero and Dr. D. Handelsman for the performance of the sensitive FSH assay, Dr. J. Doery and the Biochemistry Department of the Monash Medical Center, and Mr. N. Cahir and Dr. David Robertson for the performance of the inhibin B assay and for helpful comments on the manuscript. The kind provision of Primotestin depot by Schering Australia is gratefully acknowledged.

Footnotes

1 This work was supported by the Contraception 21 Grant of the Rockefeller Foundation, Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Grants 943208 and 973218, Australian Research Council Grant 80900657, and Schering Australia. Back

Received November 13, 1997.

Revised December 31, 1997.

Accepted January 8, 1998.

References

  1. Heckel NJ. 1940 The influence of testosterone-propionate upon benign prostatic hypertrophy and spermatogenesis: a clinical and pathological study in the human. J Urol. 43:286–308.
  2. McCullagh EP, Rossmiller HR. 1941 Methyl testosterone. I. Androgenic effects and the production of gynecomastia and oligospermia. J Clin Endocrinol. 1:496–506.
  3. Heller CG, Nelson WO, Hill IB, et al. 1950 Improvement in spermatogenesis following depression of the human testis with testosterone. Fertil Steril. 1:415–422.
  4. Heller CG, Laidlaw WM, Harvey HT, Nelson WO. 1958 Effects of progestational compounds on the reproductive processes of the human male. Ann NY Acad Sci. 71:649–665.
  5. Steinberger E, and Smith KD. 1977 Effect of chronic administration of testosterone enanthate on sperm production and plasma testosterone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and luteinizing hormone levels: a preliminary evaluation of a possible male contraceptive. Fertil Steril. 28:1320–1328.[Medline]
  6. Schearer SB, Alvarez-Sanchez F, Anselmo J, et al. 1978 Hormonal contraception for men. Int J Androl. 2(Suppl):680–712.
  7. Rowley MJ, Heller CG. 1978 Summary of studies utilising androgens in the normal human male. In: Patanelli DJ, ed. Hormonal control of male fertility. DHEW, Publication (NIH) 78–1097. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office; 145–166.
  8. Swerdloff RS, Palacios A, McClure RD, Campfield LA, Brosman SA. 1978 Male contraception: clinical assessment of chronic administration of testosterone enanthate. Int J Androl. 2(Suppl):731–747.
  9. Swerdloff RS, Wang C, Bhasin S. 1989 Male contraception: 1988 and beyond. In: Burger H, de Kretser DM, eds. The testis. New York: Raven Press; 547–568.
  10. WHO Task Force on Methods for the Regulation of Male Fertility. 1990 Contraceptive efficacy of testosterone-induced azoospermia in normal men. Lancet. 336:955–959.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. WHO Task Force on Methods for the Regulation of Male Fertility. 1996 Contraceptive efficacy of testosterone-induced azoospermia and oligospermia in normal men. Fertil Steril. 65:821–829.[Medline]
  12. Handelsman DJ, Farley TM, Peregoudov A, Waites GMH, WHO Task Force on Methods for the Regulation of Male Fertility. 1995 Factors in nonuniform induction of azoospermia by testosterone enanthate in normal men. Fertil Steril. 63:125–133.[Medline]
  13. Wallace EM, Gow SM, Wu FCW. 1993 Comparison between testosterone enanthate-induced azoospermia and oligozoospermia in a male contraceptive study. I. Plasma luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, testosterone, estradiol, and inhibin concentrations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 77:290–293.[Abstract]
  14. Anderson RA, Wu FCW. 1996 Comparison between testosterone enanthate-induced azoospermia and oligozoospermia in a male contraceptive study. II. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of once weekly administration of testosterone enanthate. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:896–901.[Abstract]
  15. Anderson RA, Wallace AM, Wu FCW. 1996 Comparison between testosterone enanthate-induced azoospermia and oligozoospermia in a male contraceptive study. III. Higher 5{alpha}-reductase activity in oligozoospermic men administered supraphysiological doses of testosterone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:902:908.[Abstract]
  16. McLachlan, Wreford NG, O’Donnell L, de Kretser DM, Robertson DM. 1996 The endocrine regulation of spermatogenesis: independent roles for testosterone and FSH. J Endocrinol. 148:1–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Frick J. 1973 Control of spermatogenesis in men by combined administration of progestin and androgen. Contraception. 8:191–206.
  18. Frick J. 1975 Effects of steroids on spermatogenesis. In: Sciarra JJ, Markland C, Speidel JJ, eds. Control of male fertility. New York: Harper and Row; 230–239.
  19. Frick J, Bartsch G, Weiske WH. 1977 The effect of monthly depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and testosterone on human spermatogenesis. I. Uniform dosage levels. Contraception. 15:649–668.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. WHO. 1992 WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen, and sperm-cervical mucus interaction. Geneva: WHO; 3–27.
  21. Zhengwei Y, Wreford NG, Bremner WJ, Matsumoto AM, Anawalt BA, McLachlan RI. 1998 Immature spermatids are not prevalent in human semen during androgen-based contraceptive regimens. Fertil Steril. 69:89–95.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Zhengwei Y, Wreford NG, Bremner WJ, McLachlan RI. 1997 Stereological analysis of germ cell numbers in the adult macaque. J Androl. 18:681–687.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Clermont Y. 1963 The cycle of the seminiferous epithelium in man. Am J Anat. 112:35–51.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Clermont Y. 1966a Renewal of spermatogonia in man. Am J Anat. 118:509–524.
  25. Clermont Y. 1966b Spermatogenesis in man: a study of the spermatogonial population. Fertil Steril. 17:705–721.
  26. Clermont Y. 1970 Dynamics of human spermatogenesis. In: Rosemberg E, Paulsen CA, eds. The human testis, New York: Plenum Press; 47–61.
  27. Sharpe RM. 1994 Regulation of spermatogenesis. In: The physiology of reproduction, 2nd ed. Knobil E, Neil JD, eds. New York: Raven Press; 1363–1434.
  28. Sterio DC. 1984 The unbiased estimation of number and sizes of arbitrary particles using the disector. J Microsc. 134:127–136.[Medline]
  29. Gundersen HJG, Bagger P, Bendsten TF, et al. 1988 The new stereological tools: disector, fractionator, nucleator and point sampled intercepts and their use in pathological research and diagnosis. APMIS. 96:857–881.[Medline]
  30. Baddeley AJ, Gundersen HJG, Cruz-Orive LM. 1986 Estimation of surface area from vertical sections. J Microsc. 142:259–276.[Medline]
  31. Jensen EB, Gundersen HJG. 1993 The rotator. J Microsc. 170:35–44.
  32. Wreford NG. 1995 Theory, and practice of stereological techniques applied to the estimation of cell number and nuclear volume in the testis. Microsc Res Technique. 32:423–436.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Anawalt BD, Bebb RA, Matsumoto AM, et al. 1996 Serum inhibin B levels reflect Sertoli cell function in normal men and men with testicular dysfunction. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:3341–3345.[Abstract]
  34. MacLeod J. 1970 The significance of deviations in human sperm morphology. In: Rosemberg E, Paulsen CA, eds. The human testis. New York: Plenum Press; 481–494.
  35. Ulstein M, Netto N, Leonard J, Paulsen CA. 1975 Changes in sperm morphology in normal men treated with danazol and testosterone. Contraception. 12:437–444.[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Zhengwei Y, Wreford NG, Schlatt S, Weinbauer GF, Nieschlag E, McLachlan RI. GnRH antagonist-induced gonadotropin withdrawal acutely, and specifically impairs spermatogonial development in the adult macaque (Macaca fascicularis). J Reprod Fertil. In press.
  37. O’Donnell L, McLachlan RI, Wreford NG, de Kretser DM, Robertson DM. 1996 Testosterone withdrawal promotes stage-specific detachment of round spermatids from the rat seminiferous epithelium. Biol Reprod. 55:895–901.[Abstract]
  38. McLachlan RI, Wreford NG, Tsonis C, de Kretser DM, Robertson DM. 1994 Testosterone effects on spermatogenesis in the GnRH-immunised rat. Biol Reprod. 50:271–280.[Abstract]
  39. Cortes D, Muller J, Skakebaek NE. 1997 Proliferation of Sertoli cells during development of the human testis assessed by stereological methods. Int J Androl. 10:589–596.
  40. Johnson L, Zane RS, Petty CS, Neaves WB. 1984 Quantification of the human Sertoli cell population: its distribution, relation to germ cell numbers, and age-related decline Biol Reprod. 31:785–795.[Abstract]
  41. Tom L, Bhasin S, Salameh W, et al. 1992 Induction of azoospermia in normal men with combined Nal-Glu gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist and testosterone enanthate J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 75:476–483.[Abstract]
  42. Bebb RA, Anawalt BD, Christensen RB, Paulsen CA, Bremner WJ, Matsumoto AM. 1996 Combined administration of levonorgestrel and testosterone induces more rapid and effective suppression of spermatogenesis than testosterone alone: a promising male contraceptive approach. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:757–762.[Abstract]
  43. Handelsman DJ, Conway AJ, Howe CJ, Turner L, Mackey M-A. 1996 Establishing the minimum effective dose and additive effects of depot progestin in suppression of human spermatogenesis by a testosterone depot. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:4113–4121.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Meriggiola MC, Bremner WJ, Paulsen CA, et al. 1996 A combined regimen of cyproterone acetate and testosterone enanthate as a potentially highly effective male contraceptive. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:3018–3023.[Abstract]
  45. Kangasniemi M, Wilson G, Parchuri N, Huhtaniemi L, Meistrich ML. 1995 Rapid protection of rat spermatogenic stem cells against procarbazine by treatment with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (Nal-Glu) and an antiandrogen. Endocrinology. 136:2881–2888.[Abstract]
  46. Tournaye H, Camus M, Goossens A, et al. 1995 Recent concepts in the management of infertility because of non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod. 10:115–119.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J AndrolHome page
R. P. Amann
The Cycle of the Seminiferous Epithelium in Humans: A Need to Revisit?
J Androl, September 1, 2008; 29(5): 469 - 487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S.-K. Choi, S.-R. Yoon, P. Calabrese, and N. Arnheim
A germ-line-selective advantage rather than an increased mutation rate can explain some unexpectedly common human disease mutations
PNAS, July 22, 2008; 105(29): 10143 - 10148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. M. Ruwanpura, R. I. McLachlan, K. L. Matthiesson, and S. J. Meachem
Gonadotrophins regulate germ cell survival, not proliferation, in normal adult men
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2008; 23(2): 403 - 411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. Wang, Y.-G. Cui, X.-H. Wang, Y. Jia, A. Sinha Hikim, Y.-H. Lue, J.-S. Tong, L.-X. Qian, J.-H. Sha, Z.-M. Zhou, et al.
Transient Scrotal Hyperthermia and Levonorgestrel Enhance Testosterone-Induced Spermatogenesis Suppression in Men through Increased Germ Cell Apoptosis
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2007; 92(8): 3292 - 3304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
K. L. Matthiesson, R. I. McLachlan, L. O'Donnell, M. Frydenberg, D. M. Robertson, P. G. Stanton, and S. J. Meachem
The Relative Roles of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone and Luteinizing Hormone in Maintaining Spermatogonial Maturation and Spermiation in Normal Men
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2006; 91(10): 3962 - 3969.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
A. Beardsley, D. M Robertson, and L. O'Donnell
A complex containing {alpha}6{beta}1-integrin and phosphorylated focal adhesion kinase between Sertoli cells and elongated spermatids during spermatid release from the seminiferous epithelium.
J. Endocrinol., September 1, 2006; 190(3): 759 - 770.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
K. L. Matthiesson and R. I. McLachlan
Male hormonal contraception: concept proven, product in sight?
Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2006; 12(4): 463 - 482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
Y. Lue, C. Wang, Y.-X. Liu, A. P. S. Hikim, X.-S. Zhang, C.-M. Ng, Z.-Y. Hu, Y.-C. Li, A. Leung, and R. S. Swerdloff
Transient Testicular Warming Enhances the Suppressive Effect of Testosterone on Spermatogenesis in Adult Cynomolgus Monkeys (Macaca fascicularis)
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2006; 91(2): 539 - 545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Garrett, D.Y. Liu, R.I. McLachlan, and H.W.G. Baker
Time course of changes in sperm morphometry and semen variables during testosterone-induced suppression of human spermatogenesis
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2005; 20(11): 3091 - 3100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
K. L. Matthiesson, P. G. Stanton, L. O'Donnell, S. J. Meachem, J. K. Amory, R. Berger, W. J. Bremner, and R. I. McLachlan
Effects of Testosterone and Levonorgestrel Combined with a 5{alpha}-Reductase Inhibitor or Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist on Spermatogenesis and Intratesticular Steroid Levels in Normal Men
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2005; 90(10): 5647 - 5655.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
Y. Wang, H. Newton, J. A. Spaliviero, C. M. Allan, B. Marshan, D. J. Handelsman, and P. J. Illingworth
Gonadotropin Control of Inhibin Secretion and the Relationship to Follicle Type and Number in the hpg Mouse
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2005; 73(4): 610 - 618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
S. J. Meachem, P. G. Stanton, and S. Schlatt
Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Regulates Both Sertoli Cell and Spermatogonial Populations in the Adult Photoinhibited Djungarian Hamster Testis
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2005; 72(5): 1187 - 1193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. D. Veldhuis, A. Bae, R. S. Swerdloff, A. Iranmanesh, and C. Wang
Experimentally Induced Androgen Depletion Accentuates Ethnicity-Related Contrasts in Luteinizing Hormone Secretion in Asian and Caucasian Men
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2005; 90(3): 1632 - 1638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
B.M. Brady, M. Walton, N. Hollow, A.T. Kicman, D.T. Baird, and R.A. Anderson
Depot testosterone with etonogestrel implants result in induction of azoospermia in all men for long-term contraception
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2004; 19(11): 2658 - 2667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. Wistuba, A. Schrod, B. Greve, J. K. Hodges, H. Aslam, G. F. Weinbauer, and C. M. Luetjens
Organization of Seminiferous Epithelium in Primates: Relationship to Spermatogenic Efficiency, Phylogeny, and Mating System
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2003; 69(2): 582 - 591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. L. Matthiesson, D. M. Robertson, H. G. Burger, and R. I. McLachlan
Response of serum inhibin B and pro-{alpha}C levels to gonadotrophic stimulation in normal men before and after steroidal contraceptive treatment
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2003; 18(4): 734 - 743.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
W.M. Hair, F. C.W. Wu, and G. A. Lincoln
An investigation of the effectiveness of testosterone implants in combination with the prolactin inhibitor quinagolide in the suppression of spermatogenesis in men
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2003; 18(4): 749 - 755.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
R. A. Anderson and D. T. Baird
Male Contraception
Endocr. Rev., December 1, 2002; 23(6): 735 - 762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
C. Welt, Y. Sidis, H. Keutmann, and A. Schneyer
Activins, Inhibins, and Follistatins: From Endocrinology to Signaling. A Paradigm for the New Millennium
Experimental Biology and Medicine, October 1, 2002; 227(9): 724 - 752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. I. McLachlan, L. O'Donnell, P. G. Stanton, G. Balourdos, M. Frydenberg, D. M. de Kretser, and D. M. Robertson
Effects of Testosterone Plus Medroxyprogesterone Acetate on Semen Quality, Reproductive Hormones, and Germ Cell Populations in Normal Young Men
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2002; 87(2): 546 - 556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Recent Prog Horm ResHome page
R.I. McLachlan, L. O'Donnell, S.J. Meachem, P.G. Stanton, D.M. de Kretser, K. Pratis, and D.M. Robertson
Identification of Specific Sites of Hormonal Regulation in Spermatogenesis in Rats, Monkeys, and Man
Recent Prog. Horm. Res., January 1, 2002; 57(1): 149 - 179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
T. M. Plant and G. R. Marshall
The Functional Significance of FSH in Spermatogenesis and the Control of Its Secretion in Male Primates
Endocr. Rev., December 1, 2001; 22(6): 764 - 786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
N. G. Wreford, T. Rajendra Kumar, M. M. Matzuk, and D. M. de Kretser
Analysis of the Testicular Phenotype of the Follicle-Stimulating Hormone {beta}-Subunit Knockout and the Activin Type II Receptor Knockout Mice by Stereological Analysis
Endocrinology, July 1, 2001; 142(7): 2916 - 2920.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. O’Donnell, A. Narula, G. Balourdos, Y.-Q. Gu, N. G. Wreford, D. M. Robertson, W. J. Bremner, and R. I. McLachlan
Impairment of Spermatogonial Development and Spermiation after Testosterone-Induced Gonadotropin Suppression in Adult Monkeys (Macaca fascicularis)
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2001; 86(4): 1814 - 1822.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page