| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
From the Clinical Research Centers |
Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, State University of New York Health Science Center, Syracuse, New York 13210
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: David H. P. Streeten, Department of Medicine, SUNY Health Science Center, 750 East Adams Street, Syracuse, New York 13210.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
10 pg/mL (
2.2 pmol/L) after 120 min
of the infusion or at 90 min after oral hydrocortisone in 16 fasting
normal subjects given oral hydrocortisone between 0800 and 0830 h.
Plasma ACTH exceeded 10 pg/mL (2.2 pmol/L) at the same times in 14/14
patients with active Cushings disease, including 3 patients whose
cortisol suppressibility by dexamethasone had been misleadingly normal
and in 4/7 patients with intermittent hypercortisolism. Occasional
variations in plasma cortisol elevations after the oral dose require
that plasma cortisol concentration be monitored at 60 min after the
oral hydrocortisone dose, because the present evidence supports the
validity of the conclusion that a plasma ACTH concentration below 10
pg/mL excludes Cushings disease only when plasma cortisol
concentration at 60 min lies between 16 and 38 µg/dL. Further
evaluation of ACTH suppressibility by cortisol would be worthwhile, to
confirm its potential value in facilitating positive diagnosis of
Cushings disease when dexamethasone suppressibility seems misleading. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Plasma ACTH suppression by hydrocortisone administration
By iv infusion. Starting at 0800 h, 1530 min after inserting plastic cannulae into a forearm vein on each upper limb, blood was drawn for baseline plasma cortisol and ACTH measurements. Hydrocortisone was then administered in an initial bolus of 7 mg, followed by a continuous infusion of 3 mg/h for 10 h, into one of the veins. Blood was drawn from the contralateral vein at 1 h and every 2 h, for a total of 10 h in recumbency, for plasma cortisol and ACTH measurements.
By oral intake. After an overnight fast, blood was drawn into a vacutainer, containing EDTA solution and fitted with a siliconized stopper, through an indwelling iv cannula, for plasma cortisol and ACTH assays at 08000830 h. Patients and normal subjects were given hydrocortisone tablets by mouth, in amounts of 0.25 mg/kg BW, immediately after the initial blood sample had been obtained. Blood was then drawn every 30 min, for 120 min, for plasma cortisol and ACTH measurements.
The importance of performing this procedure in the fasting state has
been indicated by evidence of delayed absorption of hydrocortisone
administered after breakfast (see Table 5
).
|
Laboratory measurements
Plasma cortisol concentration. Plasma cortisol concentration has been measured by RIA using kits from Amersham (Arlington Heights, IL) and Diagnostic Systems Laboratory (Webster, TX).
Urinary free cortisol output. Urinary free cortisol output was measured by RIA, using the same kits as for plasma concentrations, usually on at least two 24-h urines, since these measurements became available.
Urinary 17-OHCS output. All urines were tested for glucose. If glycosuria was present, sodium bisulfite was added in the amount of 250 mg to each tube, to prevent otherwise excessive color development, during the 16-h incubation with ß-glucuronidase, which preceded spectrophotometric measurement at 410 Å (8).
Plasma ACTH concentrations. Plasma ACTH concentrations were determined by immunoradiometric assay using kits supplied by Nichols Institute Diagnostics (San Juan Capistrano, CA). The lower limit of ACTH measurements with this procedure was 3 pg/mL.
The EDTA tubes in which blood for plasma ACTH determinations was collected were immediately placed in cups containing ice and centrifuged within 1530 min at 4 C. Plasma was separated, immediately frozen at -70 C before thawing for cortisol and ACTH assays, both on the same day, within 8 weeks. Previous study revealed no significant changes in plasma ACTH concentration after storage at -70 C for 8 weeks.
Statistical methods
Statistical data have been expressed as mean, SEM, and 95% confidence intervals (11).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
It is evident from Table 3
that the
infused hydrocortisone raised plasma cortisol concentrations to levels
that were not statistically significantly different at 120 min after
the onset of hydrocortisone infusion in the normal subjects (
:
16.2; 95% CI, 12.919.5) and the Cushings patients (
: 21.1;
95% CI, 15.227.0 µg/dL) and that this lack of significant
difference was still present after 8 h.
|
Plasma ACTH concentrations, shown in Table 4
, reveal reductions to:
: <4.5;
95% CI, <3.06.2 pg/mL at 2 h, and
: <3.1; 95% CI,
<3.03.4 pg/mL at 8 h, after the onset of hydrocortisone
infusion in the normal subjects. The plasma ACTH concentrations in the
Cushings patients were higher in every measurement in all 8 patients
and were significantly above the normal ranges at 2 h (
:
59.4; 95% CI, 13.2105.6 pg/mL) and at 8 h (
: 63.1; 95%
CI, 17.8108.4 pg/mL), equivalent to a P value <
0.05.
|
Table 5
shows that hydrocortisone,
in an oral dose of 0.25 mg/kg BW, raised plasma cortisol concentrations
at 60 min to comparable levels in the normal subjects (
: 24.5;
95% CI, 19.329.7 µg/dL) and in the groups of patients with active
hypercortisolism (
: 31.7; 95% CI, 18.944.9 µg/dL), and
those with intermittent hypercortisolism (
: 26.1; 95% CI,
15.636.6 µg/dL).
Plasma ACTH concentrations after oral administration of hydrocortisone
are shown in Table 6
. A gradual reduction
in plasma ACTH concentration is evident in all of the normal subjects,
except in study no. 17 in a subject who had mistakenly eaten breakfast
before the test. When this subject was retested in the fasting state
(study no. 16), his plasma ACTH fell at 90 min, as in all of the other
studies, to 10 pg/mL or less. The results in the normal subjects at 90
min (
: 5.6; 95% CI, 3.37.9 µg/dL) showed a significantly
greater decline in plasma ACTH concentration than in the patients with
active hypercortisolism (
: 34.5; 95% CI, 18.851.2 pg/mL), but
there was some overlap of the 95% CIs between the plasma ACTH results
in the normal subjects and those in the patients with intermittent
hypercortisolism as a group (
: 11.6; 95% CI, 4.219.0 pg/mL).
In four of the patients with intermittent hypercortisolism (patients
no. 59, 63, 64, and 65), plasma ACTH remained above 10 pg/mL at 90 min
after the oral hydrocortisone. After completion of these studies, we
tested three other patients, who were unusually obese (>90 kg), and in
whom the large dose of hydrocortisone administered raised plasma
cortisol concentration to between 50.9 µg/dL (1.4 fmol/L) and 62.6
µg/dL (1.72 fmol/L) at 60 min, i.e. approximately twice
the concentrations observed in some of our previous patients. By
repeating the oral suppression study in two of these patients, with
hydrocortisone in a lower dose (0.170.20 mg/kg), we reduced the level
of plasma cortisol at 60 min to 24 and 34 µg/dL (660 and 940 nmol/L);
and we observed normal suppression of plasma ACTH in one, but a clearly
abnormal response in the other (plasma ACTH falling only to 20.8 pg/mL
at 90 min). These observations may provide a caveat for the future
study of ACTH suppressibility by cortisol, which is clearly a
dose-dependent phenomenon.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The basis of Liddles introduction of the low- and high-dose
dexamethasone suppression tests was his recognition of the fact that
excessive secretion of ACTH, in the overwhelming majority of patients
with Cushings disease, was partially suppressible by glucocorticoid
administration in a dose-dependent manner. The present studies have
shown that plasma ACTH concentrations fall, to some extent, in several
patients with Cushings disease but consistently fall less and more
slowly in the patients than in healthy subjects. Thus, the
experimentally raised plasma cortisol levels present at 60 min after
oral hydrocortisone, in a dose of 0.25 mg/kg, were not significantly
different in the two groups of individuals, but there was complete
separation between the levels to which plasma ACTH had fallen 90 min
after the same inhibitory stimulus in the healthy individuals, in the
patients with consistently evident hypercortisolism, and even in 4 of
the 7 patients whose inconsistently excessive cortisol excretion
indicated intermittent hypercortisolism (9, 10). If ACTH
suppressibility by oral hydrocortisone administration is used as a
procedure to confirm the presence of Cushings disease, therefore, it
is essential that the usual absorption of the administered
hydrocortisone be confirmed by finding a plasma cortisol concentration
above the normal level, preferably between 16 and 38 µg/dL, at
09000930 h, 60 min after administration of the steroid, and in the
absence of known stress. Studies no. 17 and 19 in the normal subjects,
as shown in Table 5
, indicate that after breakfast, plasma cortisol
sometimes failed to show the usual rise 60 min after oral
hydrocortisone administration, changing only from 10 to 9 and from 5 to
6 µg/dL, respectively, with no consequent fall in plasma ACTH at 90
min in these studies (Table 6
). These data have confirmed the
reasonable expectation that the absorption of hydrocortisone given by
mouth might be delayed by a meal and, since breakfast and lunch are
usually associated with a spontaneous rise in plasma cortisol
concentration (13, 14), it is wise to perform this procedure after an
overnight fast. Thus, in one of our normal subjects, plasma ACTH was
elevated (25 pg/mL) 90 min after oral hydrocortisone, when he had
mistakenly eaten breakfast before the test, but fell to 10 pg/mL (2.2
pmol/L) on a second occasion, when he had not eaten before the test.
This individual is clinically normal, and his urinary free cortisol has
been normal on 2 occasions (66 and 71 µg/day or 182 and 195
nmol/day).
The misleadingly normal suppressibility of cortisol by dexamethasone probably results from an even longer half-life of dexamethasone (indicated by higher plasma dexamethasone levels, when measured simultaneously with cortisol at 0800 h) in these patients than in others with Cushings disease. Whether other factors might be involved (such as different sites of action of the steroid on the HPA axis, or their different affinities for the glucocorticoid receptors in the pituitary adenomas) is not known.
In an attempt to improve the sensitivity and specificity of the
overnight low-dose dexamethasone suppression test, Montwill et
al. (15) have recently reported that lowering the cut-off point of
plasma cortisol to 3.62 µg/dL resulted in an unsatisfactory false
positive rate of 12.5%, whereas raising the cut-off point to 7.24
µg/dL was associated with a false positive rate of 7.3%. It is
clear, from the data presented in Table 2
, that the use of such a
cut-off point would have resulted in interpreting the dexamethasone
test result as normal in patients no. 22, 32, 37, 38, 39, 45, 53, and
58 (or 14% of our patients), which we cannot consider acceptable.
The present studies have shown abnormal resistance to ACTH suppression
in three patients with unequivocal collateral steroid evidence of
hypercortisolism but with normal cortisol suppressibility by
dexamethasone. These findings indicate that suppressibility of ACTH by
cortisol may be more consistently abnormal than the low-dose
dexamethasone test, in patients with Cushings disease. This
possibility is strongly supported by the fact that the three patients,
whose surgery had been postponed because of normal responses to
dexamethasone, were apparently cured by pituitary surgery shortly after
their abnormal responses to ACTH suppression by oral hydrocortisone
were found. These findings suggest that the procedures here described
are worthy of further study and perhaps more general use, especially in
patients who have clinical features and urinary or plasma measurements
that indicate hypercortisolism but are being denied appropriate therapy
because of what now seems to be misplaced reliance on normal cortisol
suppression by dexamethasone. The iv procedure seems to have been more
reliable than the oral test and clearly need not be continued for
longer than 120 min (when plasma ACTH was consistently below 10 pg/mL).
However, where facilities for hydrocortisone infusion and blood
sampling for cortisol measurements from the contralateral arm are
either unavailable or prohibitively expensive, it may be useful to know
that the oral procedure usually is also reliable. It could probably be
performed in a clinic setting or in some doctors offices, limiting
plasma cortisol measurements to those made at 0 and 60 min (normal at
60 min: 1638 µg/dL) and the ACTH measurements to 0 and 90 min
(normal at 90 min:
10 pg/mL).
Because the suppressibility of plasma ACTH by administered hydrocortisone is likely to be dose-dependent, as the cortisol response to dexamethasone is known to be, it is clearly important to measure plasma cortisol at 60 min, after oral hydrocortisone has been administered. When this is above 38 µg/dL (1045 nmol/L) at 60 min and ACTH is suppressed below 10 pg/mL (2.2 pmol/L), as may happen in extremely obese individuals, our recent observations suggest that repetition of the study with a lower dose of hydrocortisone may sometimes provide what seems to be an appropriately abnormal result. On the other hand, in patients whose baseline plasma cortisol exceeds 38 µg/dL while simultaneously measured plasma ACTH concentration exceeds 10 pg/mL in the unstressed state after 90 min in recumbency, determination of the response to cortisol administration would seem to be unnecessary.
In general, therefore, the present evidence seems to indicate that in individuals of our population at 09301000 h, after they have been awake for at least 2 h and recumbent in a quiet environment for 90 min, and in the absence of recognizable stress, elevation of the plasma cortisol concentration above 1638 µg/dL (the range observed after hydrocortisone administration to normal subjects) should suppress plasma ACTH concentration to 10 pg/mL or less, unless Cushings syndrome of central or ectopic origin or an unrecognizable stress is present. Whether these findings will apply to other populations and to measurements of plasma cortisol and ACTH concentrations by different methods, will clearly require confirmation in far larger normal and abnormal groups of subjects.
Orth et al. (16) have emphasized the need to measure steroid
excretion for the diagnosis of Cushings syndrome in at least 2
accurately collected 24-h urines. The importance of this recommendation
has been confirmed by our findings that, in 58 patients with Cushings
disease, 1 of 2 urinary steroid determinations was normal in 9.6%,
when urinary free cortisol was measured, and 1 of 2 was normal in 6.5%
of determinations, when urinary 17-OHCS excretion was measured.
However, the misleading normality of the cortisol suppressibility by
dexamethasone did not result from intermittently excessive cortisol
secretion in at least 2 of our patients, whose urinary excretion and
mean plasma cortisol concentrations were consistently abnormal, whereas
the dexamethasone suppression test was misleadingly normal on almost
every occasion (Table 1
).
Incidentally, it might be added that the data in Table 2
indicate that
urinary 17-OHCS excretion, when measured appropriately (8) and
expressed in mg/g creatinine, may be more reliable in the diagnosis of
Cushings disease than urinary cortisol measurements. Thus, abnormal
17-OHCS measurements were found in 89.7% of measurements, both in the
basal state and during low-dose dexamethasone administration, whereas
urinary free cortisol excretion was abnormal in only 7677% of our
patients under the same conditions.
There is evidence that an erroneously normal plasma cortisol response to the overnight dexamethasone test may be recognized and corrected if the plasma dexamethasone concentration is measured simultaneously and found to be unusually elevated.
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Current address: Slocum-Dickson Medical Group, New Hartford, New
York. ![]()
Received June 9, 1997.
Revised October 8, 1997.
Revised December 18, 1997.
Accepted December 24, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |