| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Original Studies |
Departments of Comparative Medicine (J.D.W., J.K.W., L.Z., K.A.G.), Biochemistry (M.J.T.), and Internal Medicine (J.D.W., W.T.C.), Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157-1040
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Janice D. Wagner, D.V.M., Ph.D., Department of Comparative Medicine, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157-1040. E-mail: jwagner{at}cpm.bgsm.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(PGF2
) isomer (a prostaglandin (PG) isomer formed by
both autooxidation of arachidonate and cyclooxygenase activity).
PGF2
concentrations were 32% lower with E2
treatment, compared with controls, and 36% lower, compared with
E2+NA treatment (0.48 ± 0.08 vs.
0.71 ± 0.12 and 0.75 ± 0.06; P <
0.05), suggesting differences in PG synthesis between hormone
treatments. In conclusion, NA, a progestin without androgenic activity,
may still affect some cardiovascular risk factors differently than
estrogen-only therapy. However, it seems to be less detrimental than
MPA. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One mechanism whereby ERT may decrease CHD risk is that of altering SI and carbohydrate metabolism. However, the effects of ERT on insulin and glucose metabolism are inconsistent, with results depending on the type, dose, length of treatment, route of administration, and procedure used to measure carbohydrate metabolism (for review, see Ref.7). Likewise, the addition of a progestin to the ERT regimen is also controversial, with many studies reporting that progestins adversely affect carbohydrate metabolism (5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11), whereas others have not found adverse effects (12, 13, 14).
Estrogens also may decrease CHD risk via their antioxidant activity. A number of studies have found that estrogens decrease low-density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidizability (15, 16). Although estrogens antioxidant effects on plasma LDL may decrease CHD risk, the oxidative potential present in the artery wall may be of more relevance. In a recent study, we found that esterified estrogens decreased the amount of thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) present in the aorta (17). However, the TBARS assay does not necessarily reflect the extent of polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) peroxidation, and TBARS are only formed from PUFA with three or more double bonds (not from linoleic acid, which is the major PUFA in lipoproteins) (18). For these reasons, in this study, we measured arterial F2-isoprostanes. F2-isoprostanes are products of the free radical oxidation of arachidonic acid with structures similar to those of prostaglandin (PG), particularly prostaglandin F2 (PGF2) (19, 20). F2-isoprostanes are now regarded as being highly sensitive and specific markers of free radical oxidation (20).
This study was designed to examine the separate and combined effects of continuous oral estradiol (E2) and nomegestrol acetate (NA) on SI and arterial antioxidant activity in ovariectomized cynomolgus monkeys. NA is a 19-norprogesterone derivative with potent progestin activity that lacks androgenic activity (21). Consistent with the lack of androgenicity, NA did not diminish the beneficial effects of estradiol on plasma lipid and lipoprotein concentrations in postmenopausal women (22) and did not affect glucose tolerance in premenopausal women with menstrual abnormalities (23). Thus, we hypothesized that NA would not detract from estrogens effects on SI and antioxidant activity.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Thirty-six adult (812 yr of age) female cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) were used in this study. Monkeys were obtained from the Indonesian Primate Center (Bogor, Indonesia) and quarantined for 90 days. During the last 60 days of quarantine, the monkeys were fed a moderately atherogenic diet containing 0.28 mg cholesterol/kcal diet (2). After quarantine, the monkeys were ovariectomized, housed in groups of 4, and fed the atherogenic diet with either: 1) no hormone treatment (control, n = 12); 2) 0.1 mg E2 added to the diet/kg BW·day (equivalent to a human oral therapeutic dose of 1.5 mg E2/day) (E2, n = 12); or 3) E2 with continuous coadministration of 0.25 mg NA/kg BW·day (equivalent to 1.5 mg E2 and 3.75 mg NA per day) (E2+NA, n = 12). Monkey equivalents were calculated by comparing the average number of calories consumed by people (1800 kcal/day) vs. monkeys (120 kcal/kg·day) to account for differences in body weight and metabolism between species. The study period was 12 weeks, at which time the monkeys were necropsied and arterial samples collected. All procedures involving animals were conducted in compliance with state and federal laws, standards of the Department of Health and Human Services, and guidelines established by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Clinical chemistry analyses
Blood samples for measurement of plasma E2 concentrations were collected 4 weeks after starting the experimental diet and just before necropsy. Reported values are the mean of both samplings. NA samples were collected just before necropsy. Samples were collected 4 h after feeding, thus representing peak hormone levels. Plasma E2 concentrations were determined by RIA (5), and NA concentrations were determined by enzyme immunoassay after specific extraction (24).
Blood samples for measurement of plasma lipids and lipoproteins were obtained at baseline and at the end of the experiment. Baseline plasma total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) were determined using enzymatic methods previously described (17). Posttreatment measurement of plasma lipoprotein concentrations and LDL particle size were determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (25).
Fasting plasma glucose and insulin measures were determined at baseline (after ovariectomy, while consuming the atherogenic diet) and after 10 weeks of treatment (at time 0 of the minimal model studies). As described previously, glucose determinations were made using the glucose oxidase method on a Glucose Analyzer 2 (Beckman Instruments, Brea, CA), and insulin was assayed by RIA (Incstar, Stillwater, MN) (6). Plasma insulin and glucose measurements were determined in duplicate. Body weights are reported at baseline and at the time of minimal model analysis.
Minimal model analysis
SI and glucose effectiveness were assessed by the frequently sampled iv glucose tolerance test using a third-phase insulin infusion (modified minimal model) (26, 27) after 10 weeks of treatment. After an overnight fast, monkeys were anesthetized with ketamine hydrochloride (15 mg/kg, im) and weighed, and an indwelling catheter was placed in the saphenous vein. One-milliliter baseline blood samples were collected into tubes containing fluoride at -5 and 0 min, and glucose (0.5 g/kg) was injected over 30 sec at time 0. The catheter was thoroughly flushed and 1-mL blood samples were taken at minutes 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, and 20. After the 20-min sample, insulin (0.15 U/kg) was injected and blood collected at 22, 24, 28, 32, 40, 45, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 110, 120, 140, 160, and 180 min. Plasma glucose and insulin concentrations were determined as described above.
Arterial assessments
Arterial cholesterol and isoprostane measurements were
determined in sections of thoracic aorta that were frozen in liquid
nitrogen and stored frozen at -70°C until analysis. Aortic
lipid extracts were prepared using the method of Folch et
al. (28). Total and free cholesterol content were determined
enzymatically (17). Cholesteryl ester content was calculated as the
difference between total and free cholesterol. Isoprostanes were
measured using negative ion-selective ion-monitoring gas
chromatography-mass spectroscopy as reported by Morrow et
al. (19). Residual adventitia was removed after soaking the artery
in 0.1 mmol/L diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid to scavenge
transition metals, and 80 µm butylated hydroxytoluene to inhibit
further oxidation. Tissues were ground in liquid nitrogen and then
extracted using the method of Folch et al. (28), including
0.1 mmol/L diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid, 80 µm butylated
hydroxytoluene, and 2 µm triphenylphosphine in the extraction to
prevent further oxidation. After separating the aqueous layer, the
protein was pelleted by low-speed centrifugation, digested in 1.7 N
NaOH (2 days), and quantified by the method of Lowry et al.
(29) using a BSA standard digested in the same fashion. The organic
layer was dried down in vacuo and then taken up in methylene
chloride-methanol with d4-PG F2
(Cayman
Chemical Co., Ann Arbor, MI) added as an internal standard. The
neutralized sample was loaded on a preconditioned C-18 cartridge, and
the prostanoid fraction was eluted. After drying, the sample was taken
up in ethyl acetate-hexane, applied to a silica cartridge, and the
prostanoids were eluted with ethylacetate-ethanol. The eluant was
dried, converted into pentafluorobenzyl esters, and then separated from
less polar impurities by thin-layer chromatography using
ethanol-hexane. The ester band was eluted with methanol, dried down,
converted to trimethylsiloxyl ethers with
bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide in pyridine, and then
analyzed on a Ribermag R1010C quadrupole mass analyzer (Nermag,
SA, France) interfaced to a Hewlett-Packard model 5890 Series II gas
chromatograph (Hewlett Packard, Wilmington, DE). The 30 m x 0.25
mm DB Wax (J & W Scientific, Rancho Cardova, CA) column
introduced samples directly into the mass spectrometer source. The
injection temperature was set at 270°C, and the transfer line was set
at 250°C. The oven program-ramp temperature was set from 100°C to
235°C at 25°C/min, held for 8 min, then ramped to 250°C and held
for an additional 5 min. Data acquisition and reduction used Vector II
software by Teknivent.
Data analysis
Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ANOVA or
covariance (when baseline measures were available) was used to
determine treatment effects. SI and glucose effectiveness were covaried
by baseline insulin:glucose ratio, because they were significant
(P = 0.01) pretreatment predictors. If there was a
significant treatment effect, pairwise comparisons were made. Pearson
product-moment correlations were used to assess the relationship among
variables. Differences were considered statistically significant at
P
0.05. Two monkeys in the E2 group did
not eat the diet and were removed from the study. An insufficient
number of blood samples was collected for one monkey (E2
group) in the minimal model analysis, and thus, SI and glucose
effectiveness could not be calculated for that animal.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
. Thus, we
calculated separately the isoprostanes identical to
PGF2
, which can be formed via autooxidation and via
cyclooxygenase activity. There was a significant treatment difference
in concentrations of PGF2
. PGF2
concentrations were 32% lower in monkeys treated with E2
(compared with controls) and 36% lower, compared with combined
treatment (0.48 ± 0.08 vs. 0.71 ± 0.12 and
0.75 ± 0.6 ng/mg protein, respectively; P <
0.05) (Fig. 2
|
|
and cholesterol content, whereas there was no
correlation with SI.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Consistent with the improvement in SI, E2-treated monkeys
weighed slightly less than control or combination-treated monkeys
(Table 1
). In studies of longer duration, we have found that
E2 treatment results in significantly lower body weights
and less abdominal body fat content, as determined by computed
tomography (27). In women, hormone treatment is also associated with
lower body weight and body fat (12, 14, 30) and may explain some of the
improvements in carbohydrate metabolism and CHD risk. In contrast to
estrogens, progestins tend to increase body weight and body fat (5),
and treatment with NA alone in women has been shown to increase body
weight slightly (23). Fasting glucose concentrations were slightly (but
significantly) higher with E2 treatment, and glucose
effectiveness tended to be lower with E2 administration.
Similarly, in the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions Trial
(14), although a slight decrease in fasting glucose and insulin was
found with hormone treatments (primarily CEE), an increase in the 2-h
glucose levels (after an oral glucose tolerance test) was found,
compared with the placebo group. Godsland et al. (10) also
reported a deterioration in glucose tolerance and suggested that it was
caused by the decreased plasma insulin levels with estrogen. Despite
the higher fasting glucose concentrations found in the present study,
insulin:glucose ratios were slightly lower with E2
treatment, consistent with the greater SI, as determined by the minimal
model analyses. There were no significant differences in plasma total
or HDL-C concentrations among treatment groups, but average LDL
particle size was slightly lower in both hormone-treated groups,
consistent with previous studies of estrogen treatment (17, 27).
Previous studies of hormonal effects on carbohydrate metabolism have yielded conflicting results. Variations caused by testing procedures used to monitor carbohydrate metabolism and the type, dose, length of time on therapy, and route of administration of hormone therapy are all important variables in insulin and glucose responses to therapy. For example, in a series of studies by Lobos group, using an insulin tolerance test to determine SI, the effect of oral CEE was dose dependent, i.e. a high dose (1.25 mg/day) resulted in decreased SI, and a lower dose (0.625 mg/day) resulted in increased SI (8). However, the addition of MPA (10 mg/day) to CEE (0.625 mg/day) attenuated the beneficial effects of CEE on SI (8), whereas lower doses of MPA (2.5 mg/day) did not affect SI (31). Although the high dose of oral CEE decreased SI, both a low dose (0.05 mg/day) and a high dose (1 mg/day) of transdermal E2 (9) improved SI, suggesting that the first-pass effect may explain the adverse effect of the higher oral dose. As with oral CEE, the addition of MPA (10 mg/day) to the transdermal E2 regimen resulted in reduced SI (9). Adverse effects of progestins on SI have been reported in other studies in women (10, 32) and in our previous studies in cynomolgus monkeys (5, 6). Furthermore, both SI (33) and insulin receptor concentrations (34) have been shown to decrease during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle (when progesterone levels are higher), suggesting that even endogenous progesterone in normal, cycling women detracts from E2s beneficial effect. Although a previous study, using NA in premenopausal women, found no adverse effects on carbohydrate metabolism, these women had menstrual abnormalities, and may not have had normal follicular-phase E2 concentrations, and thus, may have already had impaired carbohydrate metabolism (23).
The adverse effects of progesterone and progestins on SI may be caused by a number of factors. Progestins have varying amounts of androgenic activity and may even have glucocorticoid activity, which could adversely affect carbohydrate metabolism (21, 35, 36). For instance, although both are synthetic progestins, MPA was reported to be androgenic (35), whereas NA was not (21). Also, in contrast to other progestins, NA does not inhibit adrenocortical function or affect sodium balance, as do progesterone and MPA (21). Other mechanisms may involve decreased insulin clearance (9) and effects on insulin receptor number (34) with progestins.
An additional mechanism, whereby estrogens may decrease CHD risk,
involves antioxidant activity. Estrogens have been shown to increase
the resistance of LDL to oxidation (15, 16, 37). However, the
antioxidant effects within the arterial wall may more accurately
reflect cardiovascular risk. Thus, we used a gas chromatography-mass
spectroscopy technique to measure arterial F2-isoprostanes
as an index of lipid peroxidation. Typically, there is a constant ratio
between total F2-isoprostanes and the PGF2
isomer. However, in this study, the ratio of the peak correlating with
PGF2
was not constant, leading us to calculate
PGF2
separately from the other isomers. In doing so, we
found that, despite no treatment effect on total
F2-isoprostanes, E2-treated animals had 32%
lower PGF2
concentrations (compared with controls) and
36% lower (compared with combined E2+NA treatment)
(P < 0.05; Fig. 2
). In a previous study (17), we found
that esterified estrogens decreased the arterial content of TBARS by
about 50%, compared with ovariectomized controls. Whether the greater
percent reduction in products of lipid peroxidation with esterified
estrogens in the previous study is caused by different methodologies,
different types of estrogens, or both is unknown. However, there have
been a number of reports showing varying antioxidant activity among
different estrogenic steroids (15, 37).
F2-isoprostanes have structures similar to PGs that are
generated enzymatically from arachidonic acid and, a small fraction of
the isoprostanes are identical to the enzymatically generated
prostanoids (19, 38). Therefore, for example, the measurement of
PGF2
includes both PGF2
generated by
autooxidation and that formed by a cyclooxygenase-dependent pathway.
The isoprostane products are formed at a constant ratio under specified
conditions. Measured increases in the natural PGs, in this case
PGF2
, suggest that a natural, physiologic response has
been activated to cause the cyclooxygenase-dependent formation of
PGF2
.
Sex hormones have been found to affect a number of pathways in PG
formation. For example, estrogens have been shown to increase
prostacyclin formation in human umbilical vessels (39, 40), and
cyclooxygenase and prostacyclin synthase activities in rat aortic
smooth-muscle cells (41). In contrast, estrogens have little effect on
thromboxane synthesis (40) or result in decreased thromboxane formation
(42). Although fewer studies have addressed PGF2
levels
in vascular cells, rats in the proestrus stage (i.e. with
high E2 concentrations) had less aortic PGF2
production than ovariectomized rats and less contractile response to
norepinephrine (43). Progesterone has been shown to increase
PGE2-9-ketoreductase activity, which converts
PGE2 to PGF2
in follicles (44). Whether this
increase also occurs in cells of the artery wall is unknown. However,
it is possible that with estrogen treatment, there is a shunting of
arachidonic acid and PG intermediates to prostacyclin formation,
resulting in vasodilation; whereas with progestins or no hormone
treatment, there may be decreased prostacyclin and increased
PGF2
formation, which could result in vasoconstriction.
However, in parallel studies done using the same animals, the
beneficial effects of E2 on coronary artery vascular
reactivity remained unchanged with combined E2+NA (Williams
JK et al., unpublished data).
The present study was a short-term study and was not designed to permit
development of atherosclerotic lesions. Thus, the lack of treatment
differences in arterial cholesterol content (Table 3
) was not
unexpected, and it was consistent with previous ERT studies (also of 12
weeks duration) (45). However, longer duration of ERT does result in
decreased progression of atherosclerosis in monkeys (3, 27) and is
consistent with decreased CHD risk in women (1). The limited variation
in arterial cholesterol content in this study may have impaired our
ability to determine whether treatment changes in SI or isoprostane
formation resulted in differences in lesion extent. Regardless, there
were the expected positive correlations between plasma cholesterol and
LDL size with cholesterol content. Interestingly, there was a negative
correlation between PGF2
and aortic cholesterol content,
whereas there was no correlation with SI and cholesterol content.
In conclusion, oral E2 treatment in ovariectomized monkeys
resulted in greater SI and less PGF2
formation, compared
with control animals, which may represent additional non-lipid-mediated
mechanisms, whereby ERT improves CHD risk. The beneficial effects of
E2 on these parameters were attenuated by the addition of
NA. However, the addition of NA did not reduce SI below that of control
monkeys. Because increases in progesterone concentrations during the
luteal phase also decrease SI, it is not surprising that even a
progestin without androgenic activity, like NA, may reduce the SI level
to that of control animals. Also, this study used a continuous combined
estrogen-progestin therapy, which may be more detrimental than
sequential progestin therapy.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received May 29, 1997.
Revised September 18, 1997.
Accepted November 24, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Simoncini, A. Caruso, S. Garibaldi, X.-D. Fu, M. S. Giretti, C. Baldacci, C. Scorticati, L. Fornari, P. Mannella, and A. R. Genazzani Activation of nitric oxide synthesis in human endothelial cells using nomegestrol acetate. Obstet. Gynecol., October 1, 2006; 108(4): 969 - 978. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Wagner, D. C. Schwenke, K. A. Greaves, L. Zhang, M. S. Anthony, R. M. Blair, M. K. Shadoan, and J. K. Williams Soy Protein With Isoflavones, but not an Isoflavone-Rich Supplement, Improves Arterial Low-Density Lipoprotein Metabolism and Atherogenesis Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., December 1, 2003; 23(12): 2241 - 2246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. E. Van Pelt, W. S. Gozansky, R. S. Schwartz, and W. M. Kohrt Intravenous estrogens increase insulin clearance and action in postmenopausal women Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, August 1, 2003; 285(2): E311 - E317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Bagis, A. Gokcel, H. B. Zeyneloglu, E. Tarim, E. B. Kilicdag, and B. Haydardedeoglu The Effects of Short-Term Medroxyprogesterone Acetate and Micronized Progesterone on Glucose Metabolism and Lipid Profiles in Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Prospective Randomized Study J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2002; 87(10): 4536 - 4540. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |