help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Cefalu, W. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Cefalu, W. T.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*CHOLESTEROL
*ESTRADIOL
*MEGESTROL
*PROSTAGLANDIN F2ALPHA
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 83, No. 3 896-901
Copyright © 1998 by The Endocrine Society


Original Studies

Insulin Sensitivity and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Ovariectomized Monkeys with Estradiol Alone or Combined with Nomegestrol Acetate1

Janice D. Wagner, Michael J. Thomas, J. Koudy Williams, Li Zhang, Kathryn A. Greaves and William T. Cefalu

Departments of Comparative Medicine (J.D.W., J.K.W., L.Z., K.A.G.), Biochemistry (M.J.T.), and Internal Medicine (J.D.W., W.T.C.), Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157-1040

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Janice D. Wagner, D.V.M., Ph.D., Department of Comparative Medicine, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157-1040. E-mail: jwagner{at}cpm.bgsm.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We have previously shown that medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), either alone or combined with conjugated equine estrogens (CEE), significantly decreased insulin sensitivity (SI), compared with both untreated controls and those treated with CEE alone. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of estradiol (E2), with and without nomegestrol acetate (NA; a potent progestin that lacks androgenic activity), on SI and arterial antioxidant activity, as determined by F2-isoprostanes. Thirty-six adult female cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) were ovariectomized and fed a moderately atherogenic diet, with one of the following three treatments added to the diet, for 12 weeks: 1) no treatment (control); 2) E2; or 3) continuous combined E2 + NA (E2+NA). SI and glucose effectiveness were assessed by the frequently sampled iv glucose tolerance test using a third-phase insulin infusion after 10 weeks of treatment. Cholesterol content and F2-isoprostanes were measured in the thoracic aorta after 12 weeks of treatment. E2 treatment resulted in a significantly greater SI, compared with control or E2+NA-treated monkeys (10.03 ± 0.91 vs. 6.35 and 6.49 x 10-4 min-1 µU-1mL; P < 0.05). In contrast to our studies of CEE and MPA, E2+NA treatment, though reducing the SI below that of the E2 group, did not reduce the SI below that of control monkeys. As expected, the short period of treatment resulted in no significant differences in aortic cholesterol content. There was no treatment effect on total F2-isoprostanes (representing F2-isoprostane formation caused primarily by autooxidation), suggesting minimal antioxidant activity. However, there was a treatment difference in the prostaglandin F2{alpha} (PGF2{alpha}) isomer (a prostaglandin (PG) isomer formed by both autooxidation of arachidonate and cyclooxygenase activity). PGF2{alpha} concentrations were 32% lower with E2 treatment, compared with controls, and 36% lower, compared with E2+NA treatment (0.48 ± 0.08 vs. 0.71 ± 0.12 and 0.75 ± 0.06; P < 0.05), suggesting differences in PG synthesis between hormone treatments. In conclusion, NA, a progestin without androgenic activity, may still affect some cardiovascular risk factors differently than estrogen-only therapy. However, it seems to be less detrimental than MPA.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ESTROGEN replacement therapy (ERT) reduces the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) by about 50% in women (1) and similarly decreases the atherosclerosis extent in nonhuman primates (2, 3). However, a progestin is typically added to the ERT regimen to reduce risk of endometrial cancer, and this may detract from estrogen’s beneficial effects. For example, we recently have described a number of studies in cynomolgus monkeys where the combined administration of conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) with medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) adversely affected coronary artery atherosclerosis extent (3), vascular reactivity (4), and both carbohydrate metabolism and insulin sensitivity (SI) (5, 6), compared with CEE alone.

One mechanism whereby ERT may decrease CHD risk is that of altering SI and carbohydrate metabolism. However, the effects of ERT on insulin and glucose metabolism are inconsistent, with results depending on the type, dose, length of treatment, route of administration, and procedure used to measure carbohydrate metabolism (for review, see Ref.7). Likewise, the addition of a progestin to the ERT regimen is also controversial, with many studies reporting that progestins adversely affect carbohydrate metabolism (5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11), whereas others have not found adverse effects (12, 13, 14).

Estrogens also may decrease CHD risk via their antioxidant activity. A number of studies have found that estrogens decrease low-density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidizability (15, 16). Although estrogen’s antioxidant effects on plasma LDL may decrease CHD risk, the oxidative potential present in the artery wall may be of more relevance. In a recent study, we found that esterified estrogens decreased the amount of thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) present in the aorta (17). However, the TBARS assay does not necessarily reflect the extent of polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) peroxidation, and TBARS are only formed from PUFA with three or more double bonds (not from linoleic acid, which is the major PUFA in lipoproteins) (18). For these reasons, in this study, we measured arterial F2-isoprostanes. F2-isoprostanes are products of the free radical oxidation of arachidonic acid with structures similar to those of prostaglandin (PG), particularly prostaglandin F2 (PGF2) (19, 20). F2-isoprostanes are now regarded as being highly sensitive and specific markers of free radical oxidation (20).

This study was designed to examine the separate and combined effects of continuous oral estradiol (E2) and nomegestrol acetate (NA) on SI and arterial antioxidant activity in ovariectomized cynomolgus monkeys. NA is a 19-norprogesterone derivative with potent progestin activity that lacks androgenic activity (21). Consistent with the lack of androgenicity, NA did not diminish the beneficial effects of estradiol on plasma lipid and lipoprotein concentrations in postmenopausal women (22) and did not affect glucose tolerance in premenopausal women with menstrual abnormalities (23). Thus, we hypothesized that NA would not detract from estrogen’s effects on SI and antioxidant activity.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals and experimental design

Thirty-six adult (8–12 yr of age) female cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) were used in this study. Monkeys were obtained from the Indonesian Primate Center (Bogor, Indonesia) and quarantined for 90 days. During the last 60 days of quarantine, the monkeys were fed a moderately atherogenic diet containing 0.28 mg cholesterol/kcal diet (2). After quarantine, the monkeys were ovariectomized, housed in groups of 4, and fed the atherogenic diet with either: 1) no hormone treatment (control, n = 12); 2) 0.1 mg E2 added to the diet/kg BW·day (equivalent to a human oral therapeutic dose of 1.5 mg E2/day) (E2, n = 12); or 3) E2 with continuous coadministration of 0.25 mg NA/kg BW·day (equivalent to 1.5 mg E2 and 3.75 mg NA per day) (E2+NA, n = 12). Monkey equivalents were calculated by comparing the average number of calories consumed by people (1800 kcal/day) vs. monkeys (120 kcal/kg·day) to account for differences in body weight and metabolism between species. The study period was 12 weeks, at which time the monkeys were necropsied and arterial samples collected. All procedures involving animals were conducted in compliance with state and federal laws, standards of the Department of Health and Human Services, and guidelines established by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Clinical chemistry analyses

Blood samples for measurement of plasma E2 concentrations were collected 4 weeks after starting the experimental diet and just before necropsy. Reported values are the mean of both samplings. NA samples were collected just before necropsy. Samples were collected 4 h after feeding, thus representing peak hormone levels. Plasma E2 concentrations were determined by RIA (5), and NA concentrations were determined by enzyme immunoassay after specific extraction (24).

Blood samples for measurement of plasma lipids and lipoproteins were obtained at baseline and at the end of the experiment. Baseline plasma total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) were determined using enzymatic methods previously described (17). Posttreatment measurement of plasma lipoprotein concentrations and LDL particle size were determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (25).

Fasting plasma glucose and insulin measures were determined at baseline (after ovariectomy, while consuming the atherogenic diet) and after 10 weeks of treatment (at time 0 of the minimal model studies). As described previously, glucose determinations were made using the glucose oxidase method on a Glucose Analyzer 2 (Beckman Instruments, Brea, CA), and insulin was assayed by RIA (Incstar, Stillwater, MN) (6). Plasma insulin and glucose measurements were determined in duplicate. Body weights are reported at baseline and at the time of minimal model analysis.

Minimal model analysis

SI and glucose effectiveness were assessed by the frequently sampled iv glucose tolerance test using a third-phase insulin infusion (modified minimal model) (26, 27) after 10 weeks of treatment. After an overnight fast, monkeys were anesthetized with ketamine hydrochloride (15 mg/kg, im) and weighed, and an indwelling catheter was placed in the saphenous vein. One-milliliter baseline blood samples were collected into tubes containing fluoride at -5 and 0 min, and glucose (0.5 g/kg) was injected over 30 sec at time 0. The catheter was thoroughly flushed and 1-mL blood samples were taken at minutes 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, and 20. After the 20-min sample, insulin (0.15 U/kg) was injected and blood collected at 22, 24, 28, 32, 40, 45, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 110, 120, 140, 160, and 180 min. Plasma glucose and insulin concentrations were determined as described above.

Arterial assessments

Arterial cholesterol and isoprostane measurements were determined in sections of thoracic aorta that were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored frozen at -70°C until analysis. Aortic lipid extracts were prepared using the method of Folch et al. (28). Total and free cholesterol content were determined enzymatically (17). Cholesteryl ester content was calculated as the difference between total and free cholesterol. Isoprostanes were measured using negative ion-selective ion-monitoring gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy as reported by Morrow et al. (19). Residual adventitia was removed after soaking the artery in 0.1 mmol/L diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid to scavenge transition metals, and 80 µm butylated hydroxytoluene to inhibit further oxidation. Tissues were ground in liquid nitrogen and then extracted using the method of Folch et al. (28), including 0.1 mmol/L diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid, 80 µm butylated hydroxytoluene, and 2 µm triphenylphosphine in the extraction to prevent further oxidation. After separating the aqueous layer, the protein was pelleted by low-speed centrifugation, digested in 1.7 N NaOH (2 days), and quantified by the method of Lowry et al. (29) using a BSA standard digested in the same fashion. The organic layer was dried down in vacuo and then taken up in methylene chloride-methanol with d4-PG F2{alpha} (Cayman Chemical Co., Ann Arbor, MI) added as an internal standard. The neutralized sample was loaded on a preconditioned C-18 cartridge, and the prostanoid fraction was eluted. After drying, the sample was taken up in ethyl acetate-hexane, applied to a silica cartridge, and the prostanoids were eluted with ethylacetate-ethanol. The eluant was dried, converted into pentafluorobenzyl esters, and then separated from less polar impurities by thin-layer chromatography using ethanol-hexane. The ester band was eluted with methanol, dried down, converted to trimethylsiloxyl ethers with bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide in pyridine, and then analyzed on a Ribermag R10–10C quadrupole mass analyzer (Nermag, SA, France) interfaced to a Hewlett-Packard model 5890 Series II gas chromatograph (Hewlett Packard, Wilmington, DE). The 30 m x 0.25 mm DB Wax (J & W Scientific, Rancho Cardova, CA) column introduced samples directly into the mass spectrometer source. The injection temperature was set at 270°C, and the transfer line was set at 250°C. The oven program-ramp temperature was set from 100°C to 235°C at 25°C/min, held for 8 min, then ramped to 250°C and held for an additional 5 min. Data acquisition and reduction used Vector II software by Teknivent.

Data analysis

Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ANOVA or covariance (when baseline measures were available) was used to determine treatment effects. SI and glucose effectiveness were covaried by baseline insulin:glucose ratio, because they were significant (P = 0.01) pretreatment predictors. If there was a significant treatment effect, pairwise comparisons were made. Pearson product-moment correlations were used to assess the relationship among variables. Differences were considered statistically significant at P <= 0.05. Two monkeys in the E2 group did not eat the diet and were removed from the study. An insufficient number of blood samples was collected for one monkey (E2 group) in the minimal model analysis, and thus, SI and glucose effectiveness could not be calculated for that animal.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
As expected, E2 concentrations were significantly increased with E2 and E2+NA treatment, and NA concentrations were significantly increased in monkeys treated with the combination, compared with controls or E2 treatment alone (Table 1Go). There were no significant differences in plasma concentrations of total cholesterol and HDL-C at baseline or during treatment. LDL particle size tended to be smaller in hormone-treated monkeys (P = 0.06). Although the E2-treated monkeys were slightly heavier at baseline, with treatment these monkeys weighed less than those in the other groups (P = 0.15).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Body weights and plasma lipids and hormone concentrations (mean ± SEM)

 
Baseline fasting glucose and insulin concentrations and insulin:glucose ratios were not significantly different among groups (Table 2Go). After treatment, however, fasting glucose concentrations were significantly higher in E2-treated monkeys, compared with the control group (P = 0.02). There were no differences in fasting insulin concentrations or insulin:glucose ratios among groups with treatment.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Fasting glucose and insulin concentrations (mean ± SEM)

 
Results from the minimal model analysis are presented in Fig. 1Go. SI was greater with E2 treatment, compared with controls (P = 0.02) or the combined treatment group (P = 0.04). However, there was no difference between controls and monkeys given combined treatment (P > 0.05). There was no effect of treatment on glucose effectiveness.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Minimal model analyses providing measures of SI and glucose effectiveness (SG) for control monkeys (open bars), those treated with E2 (hatched bars), or those treated with E2 plus NA (closed bars). Bars with unlike letters represent significant treatment differences.

 
Data for arterial cholesterol content and isoprostane levels are reported in Table 3Go. Because of the brief atherogenic stimulus, there were no significant differences among the groups in total cholesterol, free cholesterol, or cholesteryl ester content; however, cholesterol measures tended to be lower with combined hormone treatment. There also was no significant effect on total F2-isoprostane concentrations. However, we noticed that there was not a constant ratio of total F2-isoprostanes to the peak that correlated with authentic PGF2{alpha}. Thus, we calculated separately the isoprostanes identical to PGF2{alpha}, which can be formed via autooxidation and via cyclooxygenase activity. There was a significant treatment difference in concentrations of PGF2{alpha}. PGF2{alpha} concentrations were 32% lower in monkeys treated with E2 (compared with controls) and 36% lower, compared with combined treatment (0.48 ± 0.08 vs. 0.71 ± 0.12 and 0.75 ± 0.6 ng/mg protein, respectively; P < 0.05) (Fig. 2Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Arterial cholesterol and isoprostane measurements (mean ± SEM)

 


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Arterial PGF2{alpha} concentrations for control monkeys (open bars), those treated with E2 (hatched bars), or those treated with E2 plus NA (closed bars). Bars with unlike letters represent significant treatment differences.

 
Shown in Table 4Go are correlations between aortic cholesteryl ester content and other measures. As expected, there were strong correlations among plasma cholesterol, LDL size, and aortic cholesterol content. There was a negative correlation between aortic PGF2{alpha} and cholesterol content, whereas there was no correlation with SI.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Correlations between aortic cholesteryl ester content and other parameters

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In this study, we examined the effects of E2 alone, or combined with NA, on SI and arterial F2-isoprostane concentrations in ovariectomized monkeys. Monkeys treated with E2 had significantly greater SI, compared with ovariectomized controls. The combined, continuous administration of E2+NA resulted in lower SI than treatment with unopposed E2, but showed no difference vs. untreated monkeys. This is in contrast to our previous findings using combined CEE and MPA. In these studies, we found no difference in SI between control and CEE-treated monkeys; however, treatment with combined CEE and MPA or MPA alone resulted in a 50% reduction in SI (6). Thus, NA seems to have a less harmful effect on SI than MPA.

Consistent with the improvement in SI, E2-treated monkeys weighed slightly less than control or combination-treated monkeys (Table 1Go). In studies of longer duration, we have found that E2 treatment results in significantly lower body weights and less abdominal body fat content, as determined by computed tomography (27). In women, hormone treatment is also associated with lower body weight and body fat (12, 14, 30) and may explain some of the improvements in carbohydrate metabolism and CHD risk. In contrast to estrogens, progestins tend to increase body weight and body fat (5), and treatment with NA alone in women has been shown to increase body weight slightly (23). Fasting glucose concentrations were slightly (but significantly) higher with E2 treatment, and glucose effectiveness tended to be lower with E2 administration. Similarly, in the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions Trial (14), although a slight decrease in fasting glucose and insulin was found with hormone treatments (primarily CEE), an increase in the 2-h glucose levels (after an oral glucose tolerance test) was found, compared with the placebo group. Godsland et al. (10) also reported a deterioration in glucose tolerance and suggested that it was caused by the decreased plasma insulin levels with estrogen. Despite the higher fasting glucose concentrations found in the present study, insulin:glucose ratios were slightly lower with E2 treatment, consistent with the greater SI, as determined by the minimal model analyses. There were no significant differences in plasma total or HDL-C concentrations among treatment groups, but average LDL particle size was slightly lower in both hormone-treated groups, consistent with previous studies of estrogen treatment (17, 27).

Previous studies of hormonal effects on carbohydrate metabolism have yielded conflicting results. Variations caused by testing procedures used to monitor carbohydrate metabolism and the type, dose, length of time on therapy, and route of administration of hormone therapy are all important variables in insulin and glucose responses to therapy. For example, in a series of studies by Lobo’s group, using an insulin tolerance test to determine SI, the effect of oral CEE was dose dependent, i.e. a high dose (1.25 mg/day) resulted in decreased SI, and a lower dose (0.625 mg/day) resulted in increased SI (8). However, the addition of MPA (10 mg/day) to CEE (0.625 mg/day) attenuated the beneficial effects of CEE on SI (8), whereas lower doses of MPA (2.5 mg/day) did not affect SI (31). Although the high dose of oral CEE decreased SI, both a low dose (0.05 mg/day) and a high dose (1 mg/day) of transdermal E2 (9) improved SI, suggesting that the first-pass effect may explain the adverse effect of the higher oral dose. As with oral CEE, the addition of MPA (10 mg/day) to the transdermal E2 regimen resulted in reduced SI (9). Adverse effects of progestins on SI have been reported in other studies in women (10, 32) and in our previous studies in cynomolgus monkeys (5, 6). Furthermore, both SI (33) and insulin receptor concentrations (34) have been shown to decrease during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle (when progesterone levels are higher), suggesting that even endogenous progesterone in normal, cycling women detracts from E2’s beneficial effect. Although a previous study, using NA in premenopausal women, found no adverse effects on carbohydrate metabolism, these women had menstrual abnormalities, and may not have had normal follicular-phase E2 concentrations, and thus, may have already had impaired carbohydrate metabolism (23).

The adverse effects of progesterone and progestins on SI may be caused by a number of factors. Progestins have varying amounts of androgenic activity and may even have glucocorticoid activity, which could adversely affect carbohydrate metabolism (21, 35, 36). For instance, although both are synthetic progestins, MPA was reported to be androgenic (35), whereas NA was not (21). Also, in contrast to other progestins, NA does not inhibit adrenocortical function or affect sodium balance, as do progesterone and MPA (21). Other mechanisms may involve decreased insulin clearance (9) and effects on insulin receptor number (34) with progestins.

An additional mechanism, whereby estrogens may decrease CHD risk, involves antioxidant activity. Estrogens have been shown to increase the resistance of LDL to oxidation (15, 16, 37). However, the antioxidant effects within the arterial wall may more accurately reflect cardiovascular risk. Thus, we used a gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy technique to measure arterial F2-isoprostanes as an index of lipid peroxidation. Typically, there is a constant ratio between total F2-isoprostanes and the PGF2{alpha} isomer. However, in this study, the ratio of the peak correlating with PGF2{alpha} was not constant, leading us to calculate PGF2{alpha} separately from the other isomers. In doing so, we found that, despite no treatment effect on total F2-isoprostanes, E2-treated animals had 32% lower PGF2{alpha} concentrations (compared with controls) and 36% lower (compared with combined E2+NA treatment) (P < 0.05; Fig. 2Go). In a previous study (17), we found that esterified estrogens decreased the arterial content of TBARS by about 50%, compared with ovariectomized controls. Whether the greater percent reduction in products of lipid peroxidation with esterified estrogens in the previous study is caused by different methodologies, different types of estrogens, or both is unknown. However, there have been a number of reports showing varying antioxidant activity among different estrogenic steroids (15, 37).

F2-isoprostanes have structures similar to PGs that are generated enzymatically from arachidonic acid and, a small fraction of the isoprostanes are identical to the enzymatically generated prostanoids (19, 38). Therefore, for example, the measurement of PGF2{alpha} includes both PGF2{alpha} generated by autooxidation and that formed by a cyclooxygenase-dependent pathway. The isoprostane products are formed at a constant ratio under specified conditions. Measured increases in the natural PGs, in this case PGF2{alpha}, suggest that a natural, physiologic response has been activated to cause the cyclooxygenase-dependent formation of PGF2{alpha}.

Sex hormones have been found to affect a number of pathways in PG formation. For example, estrogens have been shown to increase prostacyclin formation in human umbilical vessels (39, 40), and cyclooxygenase and prostacyclin synthase activities in rat aortic smooth-muscle cells (41). In contrast, estrogens have little effect on thromboxane synthesis (40) or result in decreased thromboxane formation (42). Although fewer studies have addressed PGF2{alpha} levels in vascular cells, rats in the proestrus stage (i.e. with high E2 concentrations) had less aortic PGF2{alpha} production than ovariectomized rats and less contractile response to norepinephrine (43). Progesterone has been shown to increase PGE2-9-ketoreductase activity, which converts PGE2 to PGF2{alpha} in follicles (44). Whether this increase also occurs in cells of the artery wall is unknown. However, it is possible that with estrogen treatment, there is a shunting of arachidonic acid and PG intermediates to prostacyclin formation, resulting in vasodilation; whereas with progestins or no hormone treatment, there may be decreased prostacyclin and increased PGF2{alpha} formation, which could result in vasoconstriction. However, in parallel studies done using the same animals, the beneficial effects of E2 on coronary artery vascular reactivity remained unchanged with combined E2+NA (Williams JK et al., unpublished data).

The present study was a short-term study and was not designed to permit development of atherosclerotic lesions. Thus, the lack of treatment differences in arterial cholesterol content (Table 3Go) was not unexpected, and it was consistent with previous ERT studies (also of 12 weeks’ duration) (45). However, longer duration of ERT does result in decreased progression of atherosclerosis in monkeys (3, 27) and is consistent with decreased CHD risk in women (1). The limited variation in arterial cholesterol content in this study may have impaired our ability to determine whether treatment changes in SI or isoprostane formation resulted in differences in lesion extent. Regardless, there were the expected positive correlations between plasma cholesterol and LDL size with cholesterol content. Interestingly, there was a negative correlation between PGF2{alpha} and aortic cholesterol content, whereas there was no correlation with SI and cholesterol content.

In conclusion, oral E2 treatment in ovariectomized monkeys resulted in greater SI and less PGF2{alpha} formation, compared with control animals, which may represent additional non-lipid-mediated mechanisms, whereby ERT improves CHD risk. The beneficial effects of E2 on these parameters were attenuated by the addition of NA. However, the addition of NA did not reduce SI below that of control monkeys. Because increases in progesterone concentrations during the luteal phase also decrease SI, it is not surprising that even a progestin without androgenic activity, like NA, may reduce the SI level to that of control animals. Also, this study used a continuous combined estrogen-progestin therapy, which may be more detrimental than sequential progestin therapy.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors gratefully acknowledge Ms. Karen Klein for editorial comments, and Jamie Fox and Vickie Hardy for technical assistance.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported, in part, by a grant from Laboratoires Theramex, Monaco. Back

Received May 29, 1997.

Revised September 18, 1997.

Accepted November 24, 1997.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Barrett-Connor E, Bush TL. 1991 Estrogen and coronary heart disease in women. JAMA. 265:1861–1867.[Abstract]
  2. Adams MR, Kaplan JR, Manuck SB, et al. 1990 Inhibition of coronary artery atherosclerosis by 17-beta estradiol in ovariectomized monkeys. Lack of an effect of added progesterone. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 10:1051–1057.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Adams MR, Register TC, Golden DL, Wagner JD, Williams JK. 1997 Medroxyprogesterone acetate antagonizes inhibitory effects of conjugated equine estrogens on coronary artery atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 17:217–221.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Williams JK, HonorJ EK, Washburn SA, Clarkson TB. 1994 Effects of hormone replacement therapy on reactivity of atherosclerotic coronary arteries in cynomolgus monkeys. J Am Coll Cardiol. 24:1757–1761.[Abstract]
  5. Wagner JD, Martino MA, Jayo MJ, Anthony MS, Clarkson TB, Cefalu WT. 1996 The effects of hormone replacement therapy on carbohydrate metabolism and cardiovascular risk factors in surgically postmenopausal cynomolgus monkeys. Metabolism. 45:1254–1262.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Cefalu WT, Wagner JD, Bell-Farrow AD, et al. 1994 The effects of hormone replacement therapy on insulin sensitivity in surgically postmenopausal cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 171:440–445.[Medline]
  7. Skouby SO. 1994 Carbohydrate metabolism and cardiovascular risk. In: Lobo R, ed. Treatment of the postmenopausal woman. New York: Raven Press; 263–269.
  8. Lindheim SR, Presser SC, Ditkoff EC, Vijod MA, Stanczyk FZ, Lobo RA. 1993 A possible bimodal effect of estrogen on insulin sensitivity in postmenopausal women and the attenuating effect of added progestin. Fertil Steril. 60:664–667.[Medline]
  9. Lindheim SR, Duffy DM, Kojima TK, Vijod MA, Stanczyk FZ, Lobo RA. 1994 The route of administration influences the effect of estrogen on insulin sensitivity in postmenopausal women. Fertil Steril. 62:1176–1180.[Medline]
  10. Godsland IF, Gangar K, Walton C, et al. 1993 Insulin resistance, secretion, and elimination in postmenopausal women receiving oral or transdermal hormone replacement therapy. Metabolism. 42:846–853.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Kumagai S, Holmang A, Bjorntorp P. 1993 The effects of oestrogen and progesterone on insulin sensitivity in rats. Acta Physiol Scand. 149:91–97.[Medline]
  12. Nabulsi AA, Folsom AR, White A, et al. 1993 Association of hormone replacement therapy with various cardiovascular risk factors in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med. 328:1069–1075.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Barrett-Connor E, Laakso M. 1990 Ischemic heart disease risk in post-menopausal women. Effects of estrogen use on glucose and insulin levels. Arteriosclerosis. 10:531–534.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. The Writing Group for the PEPI Trial. 1995 Effects of estrogen or estrogen/progestin regimens on heart disease risk factors in postmenopausal women: the postmenopausal estrogen/progestin interventions (PEPI) trial. JAMA. 273:199–208.[Abstract]
  15. Subbiah MTR, Kessel B, Agrawal M, Rajan R, Abplanalp W, Rymaszewski Z. 1993 Antioxidant potential of specific estrogens on lipid peroxidation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 77:1095–1097.[Abstract]
  16. Sack MN, Rader DJ, Cannon III RO. 1994 Oestrogen and inhibition of oxidation of low-density lipoproteins in postmenopausal women. Lancet. 343:269–270.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Wagner JD, Zhang L, Williams JK, et al. 1996 Esterified estrogens with and without methyltestosterone decrease arterial LDL metabolism in cynomolgus monkeys. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 16:1473–1480.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Janero DR. 1990 Malondialdehyde and thiobarbituric acid-reactivity as diagnostic indices of lipid peroxidation and peroxidative tissue injury. Free Radic Biol Med. 9:515–540.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Morrow JD, Hill KE, Burk RF, Nammour TM, Badr KF, Roberts II LJ. 1990 A series of prostaglandin F2-like compounds are produced in vivo in humans by a non-cyclooxygenase, free radical-catalyzed mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 87:9383–9387.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Morrow JD, Roberts LJ. 1996 The isoprostanes. Current knowledge and directions for future research. Biochem Pharmacol. 51:1–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Paris J, Thevenot R, Bonnet P, Granero M. 1983 The pharmacological profile of TX 066 (17-alpha-acetoxy-6-methyl-19-nor-4, 6-pregna-diene-3, 20-dione), a new oral progestative. Arzneim-Forsch Drug Res. 33:710–715.[Medline]
  22. Conard J, Basdevant A, Thomas J-L, et al. 1995 Cardiovascular risk factors and combined estrogen-progestin replacement therapy: a placebo-controlled study with nomegestrol acetate and estradiol. Fertil Steril. 64:957–962.[Medline]
  23. Dorangeon P, Thomas JL, Choisy H, Lumbroso M, Hazard MC. 1993 Effects of nomegestrol acetate on carbohydrate metabolism. Diabete Med. 16:441–445.
  24. Ezan E, Benech H, Bucort R, et al. 1993 Enzyme immunoassay for nomegestrol acetate in human plasma. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 46:507–514.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Otvos JD, Jeyarajah EJ, Bennett DW, Krauss RM. 1992 Development of a proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopic method for determining plasma lipoprotein concentrations and subspecies distribution from a single, rapid measurement. Clin Chem. 38:1632–1638.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Finegood DT, Hramiak IM, Dupre J. 1990 A modified protocol for estimation of insulin sensitivity with the minimal model of glucose kinetics in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 70:1538–1549.[Abstract]
  27. Wagner JD, Cefalu WT, Anthony MS, Litwak KN, Zhang L, Clarkson TB. 1997 Dietary soy protein and estrogen replacement therapy improve cardiovascular risk factors and decrease aortic cholesteryl ester content in ovariectomized cynomolgus monkeys. Metabolism. 46:698–705.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Folch J, Lees M, Sloane-Stanley GH. 1957 A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. J Biol Chem. 224:497–509.
  29. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. 1951 Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 193:265–275.[Free Full Text]
  30. Haarbo J, Marslew U, Gotfredsen A, Christiansen C. 1991 Postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy prevents central distribution of body fat after menopause. Metabolism. 40:1323–1326.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Graczykowski JW, Wang C-Y, Stanczyk FZ, Lobo RA. 1996 The effect of medroxyprogesterone acetate on insulin sensitivity in post-menopausal women on estrogen replacement therapy. Endocr Fert Forum XIX:4.
  32. Elkind-Hirsh KE, Sherman LD, Malinak R. 1993 Hormone replacement therapy alters insulin sensitivity in young women with premature ovarian failure. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 76:472–485.[Abstract]
  33. Valdes CT, Elkind-Hirsh KE. 1991 Intravenous glucose tolerance test. Derived insulin sensitivity changes during the menstrual cycle. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 72:642–646.[Abstract]
  34. De Pirro RE, Forte F, Bertoli A, Greco AV, Lauro R. 1981 Changes in insulin receptors during oral contraception. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 52:29–33.[Abstract]
  35. Raynaud JP, Bouton MM, Moguilewsky M, et al. 1980 Steroid hormone receptors and pharmacology. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 12:143–157.
  36. Guthrie Jr GP, John WJ. 1980 The in vivo glucocorticoid and antiglucorticoid actions of medroxyprogesterone acetate. Endocrinology. 107:1393–1396.[Abstract]
  37. Wilcox JG, Hwang J, Hodis HN, Sevanian A, Stanczyk FZ, Lobo RA. 1997 Cardioprotective effects of individual conjugated equine estrogens through their possible modulation of insulin resistance and oxidation of low-density lipoprotein. Fertil Steril. 67:57–62.[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Gopaul NK, Nouroz-Aadeh J, Mallet AI, Anggard EE. 1994 Formation of F2-isoprostanes during aortic endothelial cell-mediated oxidation of low density lipoprotein. FEBS Lett. 348:297–300.[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Mäkilä U-M, Wahlberg L, Viinikka L, Ylikorkala O. 1982 Regulation of prostacyclin and thromboxane production by human umbilical vessels: the effect of estradiol and progesterone in a superfusion model. Prostaglandins Leukotrienes Med. 8:115–124.[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Mikkola T, Turunen P, Avela K, Orpana A, Viinikka L, Ylikorkala O. 1995 17ß-estradiol stimulates prostacyclin, but not endothelin-1, production in human vascular endothelial cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 80:1832–1836.[Abstract]
  41. Chang W-C, Nakao J, Orimo H, Murota S-I. 1980 Stimulation of prostaglandin cyclooxygenase and prostacyclin synthetase activities by estradiol in rat aortic smooth muscle cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 620:472–482.[Medline]
  42. Fogelberg M, Vesterqvist O, Diczfalusy U, Henrikkson P. 1990 Experimental atherosclerosis: effects of oestrogen and atherosclerosis on thromboxane and prostacyclin formation. Eur J Clin Invest. 20:105–110.[Medline]
  43. Zamorano B, Bruzzone ME, Martinez JL. 1995 Vascular smooth muscle reactivity to norpinephrine in ovariectomized rats: relationship to vascular PGE2/PGF2alpha ratio. Gen Pharmacol. 26:1613–1618.[Medline]
  44. Murdoch WJ, Farris ML. 1988 Prostaglandin E2–9-ketoreductase activity of preovulatory ovine follicles. J Anim Sci. 66:2924–2929.
  45. Wagner JD, Schwenke DC, Zhang L, Applebaum-Bowden D, Bagdade JD, Adams MR. 1997 Effects of short-term hormone replacement therapies on low density lipoprotein metabolism in cynomolgus monkeys. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 17:1128–1134.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
T. Simoncini, A. Caruso, S. Garibaldi, X.-D. Fu, M. S. Giretti, C. Baldacci, C. Scorticati, L. Fornari, P. Mannella, and A. R. Genazzani
Activation of nitric oxide synthesis in human endothelial cells using nomegestrol acetate.
Obstet. Gynecol., October 1, 2006; 108(4): 969 - 978.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
J. D. Wagner, D. C. Schwenke, K. A. Greaves, L. Zhang, M. S. Anthony, R. M. Blair, M. K. Shadoan, and J. K. Williams
Soy Protein With Isoflavones, but not an Isoflavone-Rich Supplement, Improves Arterial Low-Density Lipoprotein Metabolism and Atherogenesis
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., December 1, 2003; 23(12): 2241 - 2246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. E. Van Pelt, W. S. Gozansky, R. S. Schwartz, and W. M. Kohrt
Intravenous estrogens increase insulin clearance and action in postmenopausal women
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, August 1, 2003; 285(2): E311 - E317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
T. Bagis, A. Gokcel, H. B. Zeyneloglu, E. Tarim, E. B. Kilicdag, and B. Haydardedeoglu
The Effects of Short-Term Medroxyprogesterone Acetate and Micronized Progesterone on Glucose Metabolism and Lipid Profiles in Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Prospective Randomized Study
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2002; 87(10): 4536 - 4540.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Cefalu, W. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Cefalu, W. T.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*CHOLESTEROL
*ESTRADIOL
*MEGESTROL
*PROSTAGLANDIN F2ALPHA


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals