The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 83, No. 3 788-790
Copyright © 1998 by The Endocrine Society
From the Clinical Research Centers |
Parathyroid Responsivity in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis During Treatment with Parathyroid Hormone1
Felicia Cosman,
Jeri Nieves,
Lillian Woelfert,
Susan Gordon,
Victor Shen and
Robert Lindsay
Clinical Research and Regional Bone Centers (F.C., J.N., L.W.,
S.G., V.S., R.L.), Helen Hayes Hospital, West Haverstraw, New York
10993; Department of Medicine (F.C., R.L.), Department of Epidemiology
(J.N.), Department of Pathology (V.S.), Columbia University, New York,
New York 10032
Address correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Felicia Cosman, Regional Bone Center, West Haverstraw, New York 10993.
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
Endocrine systems may be affected permanently by administration of
supraphysiologic doses of hormone. This is a well known complication of
glucocorticoid treatment where the pituitary/adrenal axis may never
fully recover, especially when large doses of steroids are needed
during significant physical stress. The goal of this investigation was
to determine whether responsivity of the parathyroid gland was normal
after use of (134)PTH daily as an investigational therapy for
osteoporosis. Patients were all postmenopausal osteoporotic women
treated with estrogen and enrolled in a 3-yr trial of (134)PTH by
daily subcutaneous injection (400 IU/day) in addition to their estrogen
therapy. A volunteer subgroup (n = 10) of this population was
recruited for this investigation. All patients had an EDTA-provoked
hypocalcemic challenge before beginning PTH treatment. The same
patients had repeat EDTA-challenge tests at various times during the
3-yr PTH treatment trial. Three patients had 2 infusions while on PTH
treatment (interim and at the end of 3 yr). Ionized calcium declined
identically before and during PTH treatment in response to the EDTA
stimulus. PTH(184) responses were identical before and during PTH
therapy. Furthermore, there were no differences in
1,25(OH)2D elevation or in phosphorus reduction over the
course of the EDTA infusion during daily PTH treatment. Osteocalcin
levels were higher during PTH treatment, as expected, but responsivity
to acute endogenous PTH elevations was the same after PTH treatment. We
conclude that 134PTH therapy, at 400 IU/day for up to 3 yr, does not
suppress parathyroid responsivity and should therefore (at least within
this period of treatment) have no permanent adverse effect on the
ability of the body to maintain calcium homeostasis. Additionally,
there is no difference in target organ responsivity to acute endogenous
elevations of PTH after exogenous PTH therapy.
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
DATA FROM as early as the 1970s in human
studies and even earlier from animal studies have shown that PTH is
anabolic to the skeleton (1). Our group is now in final phase of
completion of an investigation on the ability of h(134)PTH to
increase bone mass in postmenopausal osteoporotic women already treated
with a standard hormone replacement therapy (HRT) regimen (2). One
theoretical problem concerning the use of a supraphysiologic dose of a
hormone for treatment of any disorder is that it might suppress
endogenous production of the hormone. This has been demonstrated with
endocrine systems such as the pituitary/adrenal axis, where it is
thought that administration of supraphysiologic glucocorticoid dose for
even as short a period as 24 weeks might cause suppression of the
bodys ability to produce stress doses of glucocorticoid for up to 1
yr (3). For h(134)PTH to be considered as a valid therapeutic option
for osteoporosis, it should not cause significant suppression of
endogenous parathyroid function, an outcome that could adversely affect
calcium homeostasis.
To determine whether daily subcutaneous administration of h(134)PTH
for up to 3 yr might be associated with suppression of parathyroid
hormone production, we studied the parathyroid response to EDTA-induced
hypocalcemia before and during h(134)PTH treatment in postmenopausal
osteoporotic women (also treated with HRT). Because basal levels of
hormone do not provide adequate information about reserve physiologic
endocrine function (3, 4), the EDTA dynamic test was utilized to
increase the demand for maximal endogenous PTH production.
 |
Methods
|
|---|
Subjects
All subjects were osteoporotic women recruited from our ongoing
clinical trial evaluating the effects of daily subcutaneous h(134)PTH
administration in estrogenized women, in comparison with estrogen
alone, on bone mass and bone turnover (2). Details of the patient
selection process and PTH treatment protocol have been published
previously (2). Briefly, all subjects were postmenopausal, had
osteoporosis by criteria of the World Health Organization, and had been
on HRT for at least 1 yr. All patients had total calcium intakes of at
least 1000 mg/day, either through diet or diet plus calcium
supplements.
After assuring that bone mass was stable over at least 1 yr of
prospective evaluation, patients (n = 50) were randomly assigned
to stay on HRT alone or to receive h(134)PTH 400 IU/day in addition
to HRT. Ten subjects assigned to the PTH plus HRT arm of the protocol
agreed to volunteer for this study. A description of the patients is
shown in Table 1
.
Subjects completed a baseline (pre-PTH treatment) EDTA infusion study
following the protocol below. During the 3-yr course of daily
h(134)PTH therapy, patients had repeat EDTA infusions at the
following times: 6 months (n = 3), 12 months (n = 3), and
between 24 and 36 months (n = 7). Three of the patients had both
interim EDTA infusion studies (at 612 months) and EDTA assessments at
the 3-yr time point. The identical protocol was followed for the repeat
EDTA determinations as for the pre-PTH treatment infusion.
EDTA infusions
All subjects continued their mineral supplements and PTH
injections on the day before the study. On the day of the study,
however, no supplements or injections were given that morning. Patients
presented to the Clinical Research Center at 0800 hr, after an
overnight fast. The EDTA infusions were performed as previously
described (5). Two intravenous catheters were inserted in opposite
arms: one for phlebotomy and one for EDTA infusion. After two basal
blood samples were obtained over a 20-min period, sodium EDTA (50 mg/kg
body weight in 500 cc 5% dextrose solution with 7 mL 2% lidocaine)
was infused over a 2-h period at 250 mL/hour. Blood was sampled at 30,
60, 90, 120, 180, 240, and 300 min, and at 24 h after starting the
infusion. Patients ate a light breakfast and lunch during the
study.
Biochemistry:
Serum was analyzed for ionized calcium (Ca) and total phosphorus
(by standard techniques), PTH184 (by immunoradiometric assay, Allegro
Intact PTH, Nichols Institute, San Juan Capistrano, Ca),
1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (by radioreceptor assay), and osteocalcin (by
immunoradioreceptor assay, human osteocalcin, Nichols Institute, Ca).
All intraassay coefficients of variation were less than 8% and all
interassay coefficients of variation were less than 10%, as published
previously (5, 6).
Analysis
During-treatment results of EDTA infusion were pooled and an
analysis of variance was performed using duration of PTH treatment as a
covariate. As duration of treatment was not found to be a significant
influence on parathyroid response, the remainder of the analysis was
performed with the during-treatment results pooled. For the three
patients who had two during-drug infusions, only the second (3-yr)
infusion results were used for this pooled analysis. Changes in
biochemical indices over time and group differences in biochemistry
before and during treatment (0.53 yr) were evaluated by repeated
measures analysis of variance and contrast transformation for
time/group effects and time/group interactions.
 |
Results
|
|---|
This cohort of patients (Table 1
) was representative of the total
volunteer sample in our clinical trial of PTH treatment (2). All
biochemical indices were the same at baseline in patients pre-PTH
treatment and post-PTH treatment with the exception of
osteocalcin. Sustained increments in
biochemical indices of bone formation during PTH treatment have been
shown previously (2).
The expected decline in mean serum ionized calicum during EDTA infusion
was very similar before and during PTH treatment, with the nadir at the
end of the infusion and a return to baseline within 24 h. Mean levels
of (184)PTH (Fig. 1A
) increased during EDTA infusion and remained
elevated after the infusion was discontinued. There was no difference
in the parathyroid response as a result of h(134)PTH treatment.
Levels of PTH were still significantly higher than baseline 24 h
after the start of EDTA infusion, both before and during h(134)PTH
treatment (P < 0.02).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. Changes in biochemical homeostasis variables
during infusion of sodium EDTA (50 mg/kg over 2 hr) in estrogenized
postmenopausal women before PTH treatment and during daily
subcutaneous h(134)PTH treatment (400IU/day) for 636 months. *,
significant time trend, all P < 0.005.
|
|
Increments in 1,25(OH)2D were seen at 24 h in response
to EDTA infusion, with no significant differences as a result of daily
h(134)PTH treatment. Similarly, serum phosphorus levels (Fig. 1B
)
declined in response to acute elevations of endogenous PTH during the
EDTA infusion. These phosphorus decrements were not different after
daily h(134)PTH treatment. Osteocalcin levels were higher during
h(134)PTH therapy, as we have described (2). Osteocalcin levels
declined slightly but not significantly from baseline in response to
EDTA infusion without differences during h(134)PTH treatment.
Figure 2
shows a representative
individual subjects calcium and PTH responses in one of the 3
patients who had EDTA infusions before treatment, during treatment (6
or 12 months), and then after 3 yr of treatment. There were both
interindividual and intraindividual variabilities in the PTH response
to hypocalcemic challenge. There was, however, no indication of any
lessening of parathyroid response as a result of daily h(134)PTH
administration.
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
Our data show that administration of daily subcutaneous
h(134)PTH over a 3-yr period is not associated with any apparent
suppression of endogenous parathyroid hormone production, as assessed
by levels of (184)PTH. The conclusions are specific for the dose and
mode of administration of PTH in this study. We have previously shown
that levels of h(134)PTH administered in our treatment protocol
decline to near normal levels within 6 h of administration (7). It
may be that this rapid decline of circulating exogenous PTH allows
recovery of endogenous parathyroid function. In contrast, infusion of
PTH with continuous elevation of exogenous hormone might theoretically
result in greater suppression of parathyroid function. This has not
been the case, however, in patients who have had parathyroidectomy for
endogenous hyperparathyroidism. In that case, although PTH levels are
elevated continuously, after the hyperplastic tissue or adenoma is
removed, serum calcium is depressed for a brief period of time and
levels return to normal spontaneously (8). Endogenous parathyroid
function appears to be preserved therefore in these individuals also
(8).
Our study also shows that there does not appear to be any lessening of
the effect of acute endogenous elevations of PTH on target organs such
as renal 1,25(OH)2D production or renal phosphorus handling
after daily PTH treatment. Theoretically this might have been expected
based on downregulation of receptors in association with high exogenous
PTH levels. Again, this might have been mitigated by the kinetics of
the PTH response (7), with rapid return of PTH levels to baseline after
the injection.
This study indicates that the theoretical possibility of suppressed
endogenous parathyroid function after daily subcutaneous hPTH
administration for up to 3 yr does not occur. This finding provides
further important information about the safety of this compound in
relatively long-term trials and adds to the body of literature
indicating the potential usefulness of h(134)PTH in treatment of
osteoporosis.
 |
Footnotes
|
|---|
1 This work was supported in part by NIH Grants AR-39191 and DK-46381. 
Received August 7, 1997.
Revised November 5, 1997.
Revised November 21, 1997.
Accepted November 25, 1997.
 |
References
|
|---|
-
Dempster DW, Cosman F, Parisien M, Shen V, Lindsay
R. 1993 Anabolic actions of parathyroid hormone on bone. Endocr
Rev. 14:690709.[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Lindsay R, Nieves JW, Formica C, et al. 1997 Parathyroid hormone increases vertebral bone mass and may reduce
vertebral fracture incidence in estrogen treated postmenopausal women
with osteoporosis. Lancet. 350:550555.[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Axelrod L. 1995 Corticosteroid Therapy. In: Becker
KL, ed. Principals and Practice of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Second
Edition, Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Company. pp. 695706.
-
Graber AL, Ney R, Nicholson WE, et al. 1965 Natural history of pituitary-adrenal recovery following long-term
suppression with corticosteroids. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 25:11.
-
Cosman F, Nieves J, Horton J, Shen V, Lindsay R. 1994 Effects of estrogen on response to EDTA infusion in postmenopausal
osteoporotic women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 78:939943.[Abstract]
-
Cosman F, Morgan DC, Nieves JW, et al. 1997 Resistance to bone resorbing effects of PTH in black women. J Bone
Miner Res. 12:958966.[CrossRef][Medline]
-
Lindsay R, Nieves J, Henneman E, Shen V, Cosman F. 1993 Subcutaneous administration of the amino terminal fragment of
human parathyroid hormone (134hPTH): kinetics and biochemical
response in estrogenized osteoporotic patients. J Clin Endocrinol
Metab. 77:15351539.[Abstract]
-
Doherty GM, Norton JA, Wells SA. 1995 Surgery of
the Parathyroid Glands. In: Becker KL, ed. Principals and Practice of
Endocrinology and Metabolism, Second Edition. Philadelphia: J.B.
Lippincott Company. pp.554566.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. A Cappuzzo and J. C Delafuente
Teriparatide for Severe Osteoporosis
Ann. Pharmacother.,
February 1, 2004;
38(2):
294 - 302.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Crandall
Parathyroid Hormone for Treatment of Osteoporosis
Arch Intern Med,
November 11, 2002;
162(20):
2297 - 2309.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|